DOCSLIB.ORG

Annuaire Des Statistiques Environnementales Sous Le

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annuaire Des Statistiques Environnementales Sous Le Madagasikara ‘ MA N I DAG A A IK S L IK B A O R P E A R T FITIAVANA A AN A N FA IN DRAZ A N DROS OAN REPOBLIKAN’I MADAGASIKARA Fitiavana Tanidrazana Fandrosoana FITIAVANA − TANINDRAZANA − FANDROSOANA ANNUAIRE DES STATISTIQUES ENVIRONNEMENTALES Décembre 2016 SOUS LE CADRE POUR LE DÉVELOPPEMENT DES Étude Nationale STATISTIQUES DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT (CDSE) – 2016 Annuaire MADAGASIKARA Etude faite par : Devika Balgobin et Andriamarozaka Iharimamy 2 2016 MADAGASIKARA SOMMAIRE Contexte .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 11 Objectif de l’étude et méthodologie .............................................................................................................................................................. 11 Organisation de la collecte et traitement de l’information .....................................................................................................................12 Difficultés et limites de l’étude .........................................................................................................................................................................12 R.1 Recommandations transversales ............................................................................................................................................................13 R.2 Recommandations spécifiques .................................................................................................................................................................13 R.3 Formation et renforcement de capacités...............................................................................................................................................13 COMPOSANTE 1: CONDITIONS ET QUALITÉ DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT ....................................................... 15 Sous-composante 1.1 : Conditions physiques ............................................................................................................................................ 17 Sujet 1.1.1 : Atmosphère, climat et conditions météorologiques....................................................................................................................................... 17 Sujet 1.1.2 : Caractéristiques hydrographiques .......................................................................................................................................................................20 Sujet 1.1.3 Informations géographiques et géomorphologiques ...................................................................................................................................... 22 Sous-composante 1.2 : Couverture du sol, écosystèmes et biodiversité ........................................................................................... 31 Sujet 1.2.1 : Couverture du sol ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 31 Sujet 1.2.2 : Écosystèmes et biodiversité...................................................................................................................................................................................33 Sujet 1.2.3 : Forêts .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 51 COMPOSANTE 2: RESSOURCES ENVIRONNEMENTALES ET LEUR UTILISATION ................................... 53 Sous-composante 2.1 : Ressources minérales ............................................................................................................................................55 Sujet 2.1.1 : Stocks et variations des ressources minérales ................................................................................................................................................ 55 Sujet 2.1.2 : Production et commerce des minéraux ........................................................................................................................................................... 55 Sous-composante 2.2 : Ressources énergétiques......................................................................................................................................56 Sujet 2.2.1 : Stocks et variations des ressources énergétiques ........................................................................................................................................ 56 Sujet 2.2.2 :Production, commerce et consommation d’énergie ................................................................................................................................... 56 Sous-composante 2.3 : Terres .......................................................................................................................................................................... 57 Sujet 2.3.1 : Utilisation des terres .................................................................................................................................................................................................57 Sujet 2.3.2 : Utilisation des terres forestières ........................................................................................................................................................................59 Sous-composante 2.4 : Ressources en sol ...................................................................................................................................................62 Sujet 2.4.1 : Ressources en sol ...................................................................................................................................................................................................62 Sous-composante 2.5 : Ressources biologiques ........................................................................................................................................63 Sujet 2.5.1 : Ressources en bois ..................................................................................................................................................................................................63 Sujet 2.5.2 : Ressources aquatiques ..........................................................................................................................................................................................71 Sujet 2.5.3 : Cultures agricoles .....................................................................................................................................................................................................78 Sujet 2.5.4 : Bétail .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................82 Sous-composante 2.6 : Ressources en eau .................................................................................................................................................86 Sujet 2.6.1 : Ressources en eau ..................................................................................................................................................................................................86 2016 – 3 MADAGASIKARA COMPOSANTE 3: RESIDUS .......................................................................................................................................... 87 Sous-composante 3.1 : Émissions dans l’air ................................................................................................................................................89 Sujet 3.1.1 : Émissions de gaz à effet de serre ........................................................................................................................................................................89 Sujet 3.1.2 : Consommation de substances appauvrissant la couche d’ozone ..........................................................................................................90 Sujet 3.1.3 : Émissions d’autres substances .............................................................................................................................................................................91 Sous-composante 3.3 : Production et gestion de déchets......................................................................................................................92 Sujet 3.3.1 : Quantités total des déchets municipaux .........................................................................................................................................................92 COMPSANTE 4: PHÉNOMENES EXTRÊMES ET CATASTROPHES .................................................................. 95 SOUS-COMPOSANTE 4.1 : Phénomènes naturels extrêmes et catastrophes naturelles ............................................................... 97 Sujet 4.1.1 Survenance des phénomènes naturels extrêmes et des catastrophes naturelles...............................................................................97 COMPOSANTE 5: ÉTABLISSEMENTS HUMAINS ET SANTÉ ENVIRONNEMENTALE ............................ 103 Sous-composante 5.1 : Établissements humains...................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Compte Rendu Final D'execution De Projet
    COMPTE RENDU FINAL D’EXECUTION DE PROJET I. INFORMATIONS DE BASE Nom de l’organisation : Centre Ecologique de Libanona Titre du projet : Community Forest Management of the Tandroy Forests of Southern Madagascar Dates de projet (comme indiqué dans l'accord) : le 1 novembre 2002 – le 30 avril 2004 Date du rapport (mois/annéé): Août 10, 2005 II. REMARQUES PRÉLIMINAIRES Fournir toute remarque préliminaire susceptible d’aider à l’examen de ce compte rendu. I- Remarques Initially the concept of the project had been to work across 4 of the sub-prefectures of Androy (Amboasary, Ambovombe, Tsiombe, Beloha), however at the outset of the implementation phase of this project several factors dictated that the work be limited to the subprefecture nearest to Fort Dauphin, namely Amboasary where the project team worked in 4 communes. (These mitigating factors included a prolonged drought in the Central and Western parts of Androy, lack of capacity in the forest service personnel in the central and western part of Androy and diminished logistical support from the major project partner WWF (due to the scaling down of their Ala Maiky Programme)). Additionally to this change the project over-ran its initial proposed implementation period due to startup and fieldwork taking longer than expected and due to various delays imposed by the forest service. II- Objectif du projet Indicateur Situation actuelle Objectif : L’objectif du projet est que le plan d’action pour la A series of workshops were held in Ambovombe (July conservation participative régionale est adopte par 2003) and Amboasary (Janvier 2004) with all the major les acteurs de conservation dans la région Androy conservation stakeholders in Androy (ANGAP, AFAFI, et qu’un méthode efficace sur le transfert de gestion ASOS, CIREEF, WWF, CGDIS, ALT ENERGIE, CNRE, des ressources naturelles utilisant une CI, TCT, CRD, PACT, KIOMBA, Local district authorities).
    [Show full text]
  • Madagascar Food Security Project
    Final Evaluation report: Madagascar Food Security Project September 2017 Author: Antilahy Herimpitia Estelle Rolande (Consultant) Acknowledgements The Malagasy Red Cross and the International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) would like to express their gratitude to all those who participated in the evaluation mission of the FIHAVOTSE Project in Antananarivo, Amboasary Atsimo and Taolagnaro, from 9 to 27 July 2017. The evaluation team comprised of Ms. Herimpitia Estelle Rolande Antilahy (the National Consultant), Messrs. Sammy Fwanga and Geofrey Odera working for IFRC Nairobi, Kenya as the Monitoring & Evaluation Officer and the Emergency Planning and Reporting Officer respectively, and Mr. Emmanuel Ntakirutimana, the Monitoring & Evaluation Officer at the Rwandan Red Cross Society (RRCS). Special thanks to the project team who provided valuation information, and to the communities supported by the project with who the evaluation team spent time talking through the project interventions. Cover photo: Description of photo © XXX XXX 2 Acronyms AINA Action Intégrée en Nutrition et Sécurité Alimentaire (Integrated Action in Nutrition and Food Security - Programme funded by the European Union in South and South-East Madagascar) ASARA Amélioration de la Sécurité Alimentaire et du Revenu Agricole (Improved Food Security and Agricultural Revenue- Programme funded by the European Union in South and South-East Madagascar) AtC Accountability to Communities AUE Association des usagers de l’eau (Water Users’ Association)
    [Show full text]
  • Office of the Resident Coordinator Madagascar • Dahalo1 Attack Displaces People in the South Situation Update
    United Nations Nations Unies Office of the Resident Coordinator Madagascar • Dahalo 1 Attack Displaces People in the South Situation Update - 15 June 2012 This update is produced by the Resident Coordinator’s Office in collaboration with humanitarian partners. I. HIGHLIGHTS/KEY PRIOR ITIES • On 09 June 2012, heavily armed and well organized groups of dahalo (operating mostly in rural areas of Madagascar) carried out violent attacks on Ilambohazo village in the extreme southeast region of Anosy. • The attack left 6 people dead, all members of security forces (5 military personnel and 1 gendarme ). Another 7 agents were wounded and 4 are still missing. • After the attack, the dahalo threatened to attack six villages of Anosy Region in the following days which led to a population’s displacement towards Taolagnaro town. • Various local sources put the number of displaced people from the communes at risk at around 1,800 persons. Local authorities talked about some hundreds of people have temporarily settled in a piece of land in the town centre of Taolagnaro. • On 13 June , local authorities met to discuss the support they would provide to the IDPs and any other vulnerable families. • On 14 June, the Prime Minister, with the Minister of Defence, the Minister Internal Security and the Secretary of State for Gendarmerie and parliamentarians from the areas concerned, left the country’s capital city, Antananarivo, for Taolagnaro, to assess the security and humanitarian situation. • UN joint mission, chaired by the UNRC a.i. and composed of OCHA/RCO, WFP and UNICEF, also joined the Government mission to assess the humanitarian situation and prepare rapid needs assessment if necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Rep 2 out Public 2010 S Tlet Sur of Ma Urvey Rvey Adagas Repor Scar Rt
    Evidence for Malaria Medicines Policy Outlet Survey Republic of Madagascar 2010 Survey Report MINSTERE DE LA SANTE PUBLIQUE www. ACTwatch.info Copyright © 2010 Population Services International (PSI). All rights reserved. Acknowledgements ACTwatch is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. This study was implemented by Population Services International (PSI). ACTwatch’s Advisory Committee: Mr. Suprotik Basu Advisor to the UN Secretary General's Special Envoy for Malaria Mr. Rik Bosman Supply Chain Expert, Former Senior Vice President, Unilever Ms. Renia Coghlan Global Access Associate Director, Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV) Dr. Thom Eisele Assistant Professor, Tulane University Mr. Louis Da Gama Malaria Advocacy & Communications Director, Global Health Advocates Dr. Paul Lavani Executive Director, RaPID Pharmacovigilance Program Dr. Ramanan Senior Fellow, Resources for the Future Dr. Matthew Lynch Project Director, VOICES, Johns Hopkins University Centre for Dr. Bernard Nahlen Deputy Coordinator, President's Malaria Initiative (PMI) Dr. Jayesh M. Pandit Head, Pharmacovigilance Department, Pharmacy and Poisons Board‐Kenya Dr. Melanie Renshaw Advisor to the UN Secretary General's Special Envoy for Malaria Mr. Oliver Sabot Vice‐President, Vaccines Clinton Foundation Ms. Rima Shretta Senior Program Associate, Strengthening Pharmaceutical Systems Dr. Rick Steketee Science Director, Malaria Control and Evaluation Partnership in Africa Dr. Warren Stevens Health Economist Dr. Gladys Tetteh CDC Resident Advisor, President’s Malaria
    [Show full text]
  • Small Hydro Resource Mapping in Madagascar
    Public Disclosure Authorized Small Hydro Resource Mapping in Madagascar INCEPTION REPORT [ENGLISH VERSION] August 2014 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized This report was prepared by SHER Ingénieurs-Conseils s.a. in association with Mhylab, under contract to The World Bank. It is one of several outputs from the small hydro Renewable Energy Resource Mapping and Geospatial Planning [Project ID: P145350]. This activity is funded and supported by the Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP), a multi-donor trust fund administered by The World Bank, under a global initiative on Renewable Energy Resource Mapping. Further details on the initiative can be obtained from the ESMAP website. This document is an interim output from the above-mentioned project. Users are strongly advised to exercise caution when utilizing the information and data contained, as this has not been subject to full peer review. The final, validated, peer reviewed output from this project will be a Madagascar Small Hydro Atlas, which will be published once the project is completed. Copyright © 2014 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / THE WORLD BANK Washington DC 20433 Telephone: +1-202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org This work is a product of the consultants listed, and not of World Bank staff. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work and accept no responsibility for any consequence of their use.
    [Show full text]
  • Résultats Détaillés Toliary
    RESULTATS SENATORIALES DU 29/12/2015 FARITANY: 6 TOLIARY BV reçus: 304 sur 304 HVM IND OBAMA FITIBA AVOTS AREMA MAPAR IND IND TIM IND IND MONIM AJFO E OMBILA MIARA- MASOA TSIMAN A TANIND HY DIA NDRO AVAKE N°BV Emplacement AP AT Inscrits Votants B N S E RAZA MAHER Y REGION 61 ANDROY BV reçus 58 sur 58 DISTRICT: 6101 AMBOVOMBE ANDROY BV reçus21 sur 21 01 AMBANISARIKA 0 0 8 8 0 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 02 AMBAZOA 0 0 8 7 1 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 03 AMBOHIMALAZA 0 0 8 8 0 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 04 AMBONAIVO 0 0 8 8 0 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 05 AMBONDRO 0 0 8 7 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 AMBOVOMBE ANDRO 1 0 12 12 2 10 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 07 AMPAMATA 1 0 8 8 1 7 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 08 ANALAMARY 0 0 6 6 1 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 09 ANDALATANOSY 0 0 8 7 0 7 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 ANDOHARANO 1 0 6 5 2 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 ANDRAGNANIVO 0 0 6 6 0 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 12 ANJEKY ANKILIKIRA 1 0 8 8 1 7 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13 ANTANIMORA SUD 0 0 8 8 0 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 14 ERADA 0 0 8 8 1 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 15 IMANOMBO 0 0 8 8 0 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 16 JAFARO 0 0 8 8 0 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 17 MAROALOMAINTE 1 0 8 8 2 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 18 MAROALOPOTY 0 7 8 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 MAROVATO BEFENO 0 0 8 7 0 7 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 20 SIHANAMARO 0 0 8 8 0 8 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 21 TSIMANANADA 0 0 8 8 0 8 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 TOTAL DISTRICT 5 7 166 160 18 142 91 1 0 0 2 1 3 7 9 0 0 0 28 DISTRICT: 6102 BEKILY BV reçus20 sur
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Plan of Action (Epoa) Madagascar: Food Insecurity
    P a g e | 1 Emergency Plan of Action (EPoA) Madagascar: Food Insecurity DREF Operation / n° MDRMG017 Glide n°: DR-2020-000231-MDG Date of issue: 01 December 2020 Expected timeframe: 3 months Expected end date 28 February 2021 Category allocated to the of the disaster or crisis: Yellow DREF allocated: CHF 249,900 Total number of 725 620 persons in 3 Number of people to 10,000 from Ambatoabo people affected: affected Provinces be assisted: commune Region: Regions of Anosy, Androy, Commune targeted: Ambatoabo (Anosy Region) Atsimo, Andrefana. Host National Society presence (n° of volunteers, staff, branches): 50 volunteers mobilized, 08 staff Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners actively involved in the operation: IFRC, German RC, Luxembourg RC, PIROI Other partner organizations actively involved in the operation: UNICEF, WPF, ACF, CRS, SOS, National Office for Disaster Risk (BNGRC) and the Government of Madagascar. <Please click here for the contacts and click here for the budget> A. Situation analysis Description of the disaster On 14 November 2020, the President of the Republic, following an alarming increase of IPC 3 and 4 areas in Madagascar, called for an international appeal to all humanitarian actors to join the Government efforts in assisting the affected population in the Great South1 of Madagascar, comprised of Androy, Anosy and Atsimo Andrefana with a population of 3,535,783 million people to prevent the situation from deteriorating. Indeed, FewsNet, in its October 2020 to January 2021 Food Security Outlook (see map on right), anticipates an atypically severe upcoming lean season in the Great South. Please refer to the adjacent FEWS NET map IPC 3 (Yellow) and 4 areas (Orange).
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution De La Couverture De Forets Naturelles a Madagascar
    EVOLUTION DE LA COUVERTURE DE FORETS NATURELLES A MADAGASCAR 1990-2000-2005 mars 2009 La publication de ce document a été rendue possible grâce à un support financier du Peuple Americain à travers l’USAID (United States Agency for International Development). L’analyse de la déforestation pour les années 1990 et 2000 a été fournie par Conservation International. MINISTERE DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT, DES FORETS ET DU TOURISME Le présent document est un rapport du Ministère de l’Environnement, des Forêts et du Tourisme (MEFT) sur l’état de de l’évolution de la couverture forestière naturelle à Madagascar entre 1990, 2000, et 2005. Ce rapport a été préparé par Conservation International. Par ailleurs, les personnes suivantes (par ordre alphabétique) ont apporté leur aimable contribution pour sa rédaction: Andrew Keck, James MacKinnon, Norotiana Mananjean, Sahondra Rajoelina, Pierrot Rakotoniaina, Solofo Ralaimihoatra, Bruno Ramamonjisoa, Balisama Ramaroson, Andoniaina Rambeloson, Rija Ranaivosoa, Pierre Randriamantsoa, Andriambolantsoa Rasolohery, Minoniaina L. Razafindramanga et Marc Steininger. Le traitement des imageries satellitaires a été réalisé par Balisama Ramaroson, Minoniaina L. Razafindramanga, Pierre Randriamantsoa et Rija Ranaivosoa et les cartes ont été réalisées par Andriambolantsoa Rasolohery. La réalisation de ce travail a été rendu possible grâce a une aide financière de l’United States Agency for International Development (USAID) et mobilisé à travers le projet JariAla. En effet, ce projet géré par International Resources Group (IRG) fournit des appuis stratégiques et techniques au MEFT dans la gestion du secteur forestier. Ce rapport devra être cité comme : MEFT, USAID et CI, 2009. Evolution de la couverture de forêts naturelles à Madagascar, 1990- 2000-2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Ecosystem Valuation to Move Towards Net Positive Impact on Biodiversity in the Mining Sector
    Exploring ecosystem valuation to move towards net positive impact on biodiversity in the mining sector Nathalie Olsen, Joshua Bishop and Stuart Anstee IUCN and Rio Tinto Technical Series No.1 Exploring ecosystem valuation to move towards net positive impact on biodiversity in the mining sector Nathalie Olsen, Joshua Bishop and Stuart Anstee IUCN and Rio Tinto Technical Series No.1 ISBN: 978-2-8317-1379-3 Cover photo: © Ravoahangy Andriamandranto Layout by: The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the millerdesign.co.uk material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or Rio Tinto concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or Printed by: of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. SRO-Kundig SA The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN Available from: or Rio Tinto. IUCN (International Union for Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Rio Tinto, London, UK Conservation of Nature) Copyright: © 2011 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Publications Services Resources Rue Mauverney 28 1196 Gland Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial Switzerland purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Tel +41 22 999 0000 Fax +41 22 999 0020 Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is [email protected] prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. www.iucn.org/publications Citation: Olsen, Nathalie, Bishop, Joshua and Anstee, Stuart (2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Profil Environnemental : Région Anosy
    ONE/MO/DOC/31/ANO - ANALYSE DIAGNOSTIC ENVIRONNEMENTALE - ENJEUX ENVIRONNEMENTAUX ET INDICATEURS 2006 ONE/MO/DOC/31/ANO 1 Région Anosy Décembre 2005 ONE/MO/DOC/31/ANO 3 S O M M A I R E S O M M A I R E .................................................................................................................................................... 3 LISTE DES TABLEAUX....................................................................................................................................... 5 LISTE DES CARTES............................................................................................................................................. 5 LISTE DES ABREVIATIONS............................................................................................................................... 6 I- INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................ 8 I.1- CONTEXTE DU DOCUMENT .................................................................................................................... 8 I.2- RAPPELS DES TERMES DE REFERENCE................................................................................................ 8 I.3- LES OBJECTIFS......................................................................................................................................... 8 I.4- LA METHODOLOGIE PRECONISEE......................................................................................................... 8 I.5-
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin D'information Du Cluster Nutrition Resultats De La Surveillance
    © UNICEF/UNI209764/Ralaivita BULLETIN D’INFORMATION DU CLUSTER NUTRITION RESULTATS DE LA SURVEILLANCE NUTRITIONNELLE DANS DIX DISTRICTS DU SUD DE MADAGASCAR TROISIEME TRIMESTRE 2020 © UNICEF/UN0280943/Rakotobe BULLETIN D’INFORMATION DU CLUSTER NUTRITION RESULTATS DE LA SURVEILLANCE NUTRITIONNELLE DANS HUIT DISTRICTTS DU SUD DE MADAGASCAR | PAGE 2 I. APERÇU DE LA SITUATION NUTRITIONNELLE Au cours du troisième trimestre 2020, dix districts du sud de Madagascar ont bénéficié des dépistages exhaustifs de la malnutrition aiguë. Cette activité a été mise en œuvre par les services déconcentrés du Gouvernement de Madagascar (Office National de Nutrition et Ministère de la Santé Publique) avec l’appui technique et financier de l’UNICEF. Sur l’ensemble des dix districts, 436.388 enfants ont été dépistés sur un total de 447.178 enfants âgés de 6 à 59 mois attendus (soit 98%). L’analyse des résultats révèle une : • Urgence nutritionnelle dans 13% des communes (26 communes sur 202) • Alerte nutritionnelle dans 14% des communes (29 communes sur 202) • Situation nutritionnelle « sous contrôle » dans 73% des communes (147 communes sur 202) © UNICEF/UNI209771/Ralaivita En 2018 et 2019, les districts de Tuléar 2 et Betroka ne faisaient pas partie des zones couvertes par le Système de Surveillance Nutritionnelle (SSN). Ainsi, en excluant ces deux districts (afin de rendre la comparaison avec ces périodes possible), les résultats du dépistage du T3 2020 montrent que la situation nutritionnelle dans les communes des huit districts n’a pas vraiment changé par rapport à T3-2019 (14% en Urgence, 15% en Alerte et 71% « sous contrôle » dans 154 communes). Il en est de même par rapport à la situation du T3 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Insecurity
    P a g e | 1 Emergency Plan of Action (EPoA) Madagascar: Food Insecurity DREF Operation / n° MDRGM017 Glide n°: DR-2020-000231-MDG Date of issue: 01 December 2020 Expected timeframe: 3 months Expected end date 28 February 2021 Category allocated to the of the disaster or crisis: Yellow DREF allocated: CHF 249,900 Total number of 725 620 persons in 3 Number of people to 10,000 from Ambatoabo people affected: affected Provinces be assisted: commune Region: Regions of Anosy, Androy, Commune targeted: Ambatoabo (Anosy Region) Atsimo, Andrefana. Host National Society presence (n° of volunteers, staff, branches): 50 volunteers mobilized, 08 staff Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners actively involved in the operation: IFRC, German RC, Luxembourg RC, PIROI Other partner organizations actively involved in the operation: UNICEF, WPF, ACF, CRS, SOS, National Office for Disaster Risk (BNGRC) and the Government of Madagascar. <Please click here for the contacts and click here for the budget> A. Situation analysis Description of the disaster On 14 November 2020, the President of the Republic, following an alarming increase of IPC 3 and 4 areas in Madagascar, called for an international appeal to all humanitarian actors to join the Government efforts in assisting the affected population in the Great South1 of Madagascar, comprised of Androy, Anosy and Atsimo Andrefana with a population of 3,535,783 million people to prevent the situation from deteriorating. Indeed, FewsNet, in its October 2020 to January 2021 Food Security Outlook (see map on right), anticipates an atypically severe upcoming lean season in the Great South. Please refer to the adjacent FEWS NET map IPC 3 (Yellow) and 4 areas (Orange).
    [Show full text]