DOCSLIB.ORG

NOAA Technical Memorandum GLERL 169B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NOAA Technical Memorandum GLERL 169B NOAA Technical Memorandum GLERL-169b https://doi.org/10.25923/ev88-7488 ____________________________________________________________________________ 2018 UPDATE TO “A RISK ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL GREAT LAKES AQUATIC INVADERS” El Lower1, Nicholas Boucher2, Peter Alsip2, Alisha Davidson3, Rochelle Sturtevant1 1 Michigan Sea Grant 2 Cooperative Institute for Great Lake Lakes Research, University of Michigan 3 Wayne State University NOAA Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory 4840 S. State Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan Tuesday, September 10, 2019 ____________________________________________________________________________ UNITED STATES NATIONAL OCEANIC AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION Wilbur L. Ross, Jr. Dr. Neil Jacobs, Acting Secretary Administrator NOTICE Mention of a commercial company or product does not constitute an endorsement by NOAA. Use of information from this publication concerning proprietary products or the tests of such products for publicity or advertising purposes is not authorized. This is GLERL Contribution No. 1929. Funding was awarded to Cooperative Institute for Great Lakes Research (CIGLR) through the NOAA Cooperative Agreement with the University of Michigan (NA17OAR4320152). This CIGLR contribution number is 1149. This publication is available as a PDF file and can be downloaded from GLERL’s web site: www.glerl.noaa.gov or by emailing GLERL Information Services at [email protected]. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Addenda .................................................................................................................................................. 5 3.0 Risk Assessments .................................................................................................................................... 7 Scientific Name: Apocorophium lacustre ................................................................................................. 7 Section C: Potential for Impact ............................................................................................................. 7 Scientific Name: Arundo donax .............................................................................................................. 10 Section A: Potential for Introduction .................................................................................................. 10 Section B: Potential for Establishment ............................................................................................... 14 Section C: Potential for Impact ........................................................................................................... 25 Scientific Name: Babka gymnotrachelus ................................................................................................ 31 Section C: Potential for Impact ........................................................................................................... 31 Scientific Name: Calanipeda aquaedulcis .............................................................................................. 35 Section C: Potential for Impact ........................................................................................................... 35 Scientific Name: Carassius carassius ..................................................................................................... 38 Section B: Potential for Establishement .............................................................................................. 38 Section C: Potential for Impact ........................................................................................................... 45 Scientific Name: Channa argus .............................................................................................................. 49 Section C: Potential for Impact ........................................................................................................... 49 Scientific Name: Chelicorophium curvispinum ...................................................................................... 52 Section B: Potential for Establishment ............................................................................................... 52 Scientific Name: Clupeonella cultriventris ............................................................................................. 61 Section C: Potential for Impact ........................................................................................................... 61 Scientific Name: Cornigerius maeoticus maeoticus ............................................................................... 64 Section C: Potential for Impact ........................................................................................................... 64 Scientific Name: Cottus gobio ................................................................................................................ 67 Section C: Potential for Impact ........................................................................................................... 67 Scientific Name: Crassula helmsii .......................................................................................................... 70 Section A: Potential for Introduction .................................................................................................. 70 Scientific Name: Cyclops kolensis .......................................................................................................... 75 Section C: Potential for Impact ........................................................................................................... 75 Scientific Name: Daphnia cristata ......................................................................................................... 78 Section C: Potential for Impact ........................................................................................................... 78 Scientific Name: Ectinosoma abrau ....................................................................................................... 80 Section C: Potential for Impact ........................................................................................................... 80 Scientific Name: Eichhornia crassipes ................................................................................................... 83 i Section A: Potential for Introduction .................................................................................................. 83 Section B: Potential for Establishment ............................................................................................... 84 Scientific Name: Hypania invalida ......................................................................................................... 88 Section B: Potential for Establishment ............................................................................................... 88 Scientific Name: Hyhpophthalmichthys molitrix .................................................................................... 96 Section A: Potential for Introduction .................................................................................................. 96 Section B: Potential for Establishment ............................................................................................. 101 Section C: Potential for Impact ......................................................................................................... 108 Scientific Name: Hypophthalmichthys nobilis ...................................................................................... 115 Section A: Potential for Introduction ................................................................................................ 115 Section B: Potential for Establishment ............................................................................................. 121 Section C: Potential for Impact ......................................................................................................... 130 Scientific Name: Knipowitschia caucasica ........................................................................................... 137 Section A: Potential for Introduction ................................................................................................ 137 Scientific Name: Lepomis auritus ......................................................................................................... 143 Section A: Potential for Introduction ................................................................................................ 143 Section B: Potential for Establishment ............................................................................................. 147 Section C: Potential for Impact ............................................................................................................. 155 Scientific Name: Paraleptastacus spinicaudus triseta ......................................................................... 160 Section B: Potential for Establishment ............................................................................................. 160 Scientific Name: Paraleptastacus wilsonii ........................................................................................... 168 Section A: Potential for Introduction ................................................................................................ 168 Section B: Potential for Establishment ............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Labidesthes Sicculus
    Version 2, 2015 United States Fish and Wildlife Service Lower Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office 1 Atherinidae Atherinidae Sand Smelt Distinguishing Features: — (Atherina boyeri) — Sand Smelt (Non-native) Old World Silversides Old World Silversides Old World (Atherina boyeri) Two widely separated dorsal fins Eye wider than Silver color snout length 39-49 lateral line scales 2 anal spines, 13-15.5 rays Rainbow Smelt (Non -Native) (Osmerus mordax) No dorsal spines Pale green dorsally Single dorsal with adipose fin Coloring: Silver Elongated, pointed snout No anal spines Size: Length: up to 145mm SL Pink/purple/blue iridescence on sides Distinguishing Features: Dorsal spines (total): 7-10 Brook Silverside (Native) 1 spine, 10-11 rays Dorsal soft rays (total): 8-16 (Labidesthes sicculus) 4 spines Anal spines: 2 Anal soft rays: 13-15.5 Eye diameter wider than snout length Habitat: Pelagic in lakes, slow or still waters Similar Species: Rainbow Smelt (Osmerus mordax), 75-80 lateral line scales Brook Silverside (Labidesthes sicculus) Elongated anal fin Images are not to scale 2 3 Centrarchidae Centrarchidae Redear Sunfish Distinguishing Features: (Lepomis microlophus) Redear Sunfish (Non-native) — — Sunfishes (Lepomis microlophus) Sunfishes Red on opercular flap No iridescent lines on cheek Long, pointed pectoral fins Bluegill (Native) Dark blotch at base (Lepomis macrochirus) of dorsal fin No red on opercular flap Coloring: Brownish-green to gray Blue-purple iridescence on cheek Bright red outer margin on opercular flap
    [Show full text]
  • A Dissertation Entitled Evolution, Systematics
    A Dissertation Entitled Evolution, systematics, and phylogeography of Ponto-Caspian gobies (Benthophilinae: Gobiidae: Teleostei) By Matthew E. Neilson Submitted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for The Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Biology (Ecology) ____________________________________ Adviser: Dr. Carol A. Stepien ____________________________________ Committee Member: Dr. Christine M. Mayer ____________________________________ Committee Member: Dr. Elliot J. Tramer ____________________________________ Committee Member: Dr. David J. Jude ____________________________________ Committee Member: Dr. Juan L. Bouzat ____________________________________ College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo December 2009 Copyright © 2009 This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no parts of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. _______________________________________________________________________ An Abstract of Evolution, systematics, and phylogeography of Ponto-Caspian gobies (Benthophilinae: Gobiidae: Teleostei) Matthew E. Neilson Submitted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for The Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Biology (Ecology) The University of Toledo December 2009 The study of biodiversity, at multiple hierarchical levels, provides insight into the evolutionary history of taxa and provides a framework for understanding patterns in ecology. This is especially poignant in invasion biology, where the prevalence of invasiveness in certain taxonomic groups could
    [Show full text]
  • Ecologia Balkanica
    ECOLOGIA BALKANICA International Scientific Research Journal of Ecology Volume 5, Issue 2 December 2013 UNION OF SCIENTISTS IN BULGARIA – PLOVDIV UNIVERSITY OF PLOVDIV PUBLISHING HOUSE ii International Standard Serial Number Print ISSN 1314-0213; Online ISSN 1313-9940 Aim & Scope „Ecologia Balkanica” is an international scientific journal, in which original research articles in various fields of Ecology are published, including ecology and conservation of microorganisms, plants, aquatic and terrestrial animals, physiological ecology, behavioural ecology, population ecology, population genetics, community ecology, plant-animal interactions, ecosystem ecology, parasitology, animal evolution, ecological monitoring and bioindication, landscape and urban ecology, conservation ecology, as well as new methodical contributions in ecology. Studies conducted on the Balkans are a priority, but studies conducted in Europe or anywhere else in the World is accepted as well. Published by the Union of Scientists in Bulgaria – Plovdiv and the University of Plovdiv Publishing house – twice a year. Language: English. Peer review process All articles included in “Ecologia Balkanica” are peer reviewed. Submitted manuscripts are sent to two or three independent peer reviewers, unless they are either out of scope or below threshold for the journal. These manuscripts will generally be reviewed by experts with the aim of reaching a first decision as soon as possible. The journal uses the double anonymity standard for the peer-review process. Reviewers do not have to sign their reports and they do not know who the author(s) of the submitted manuscript are. We ask all authors to provide the contact details (including e-mail addresses) of at least four potential reviewers of their manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Evolution in Gobies (Teleostei: Gobiidae): a Multi-Scale Phylogenetic Investigation
    PATTERNS OF EVOLUTION IN GOBIES (TELEOSTEI: GOBIIDAE): A MULTI-SCALE PHYLOGENETIC INVESTIGATION A Dissertation by LUKE MICHAEL TORNABENE BS, Hofstra University, 2007 MS, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, 2010 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in MARINE BIOLOGY Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Corpus Christi, Texas December 2014 © Luke Michael Tornabene All Rights Reserved December 2014 PATTERNS OF EVOLUTION IN GOBIES (TELEOSTEI: GOBIIDAE): A MULTI-SCALE PHYLOGENETIC INVESTIGATION A Dissertation by LUKE MICHAEL TORNABENE This dissertation meets the standards for scope and quality of Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi and is hereby approved. Frank L. Pezold, PhD Chris Bird, PhD Chair Committee Member Kevin W. Conway, PhD James D. Hogan, PhD Committee Member Committee Member Lea-Der Chen, PhD Graduate Faculty Representative December 2014 ABSTRACT The family of fishes commonly known as gobies (Teleostei: Gobiidae) is one of the most diverse lineages of vertebrates in the world. With more than 1700 species of gobies spread among more than 200 genera, gobies are the most species-rich family of marine fishes. Gobies can be found in nearly every aquatic habitat on earth, and are often the most diverse and numerically abundant fishes in tropical and subtropical habitats, especially coral reefs. Their remarkable taxonomic, morphological and ecological diversity make them an ideal model group for studying the processes driving taxonomic and phenotypic diversification in aquatic vertebrates. Unfortunately the phylogenetic relationships of many groups of gobies are poorly resolved, obscuring our understanding of the evolution of their ecological diversity. This dissertation is a multi-scale phylogenetic study that aims to clarify phylogenetic relationships across the Gobiidae and demonstrate the utility of this family for studies of macroevolution and speciation at multiple evolutionary timescales.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetics and Biogeography of the Balkan Sand Gobies (Teleostei
    LINNEAN fcÄfa/ BIOLOGICAL s o c 1 e T y Journal __________________________________ iiw Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 105, 73-91. With 4 figures Phylogenetics and biogeography of the Balkan ‘sand gobies’ (Teleostei: Gobiidae): vulnerable species in need of taxonomic revision MAARTEN P. M. VANHOVE1*, ALCIBIADES N. ECONOMOU2, STAMATIS ZOGARIS2, MAARTEN H. D. LARMUSEAU13 4, SOFIA GIAKOUMI2, ELENI KALOGIANNI2, FILIP A. M. VOLCKAERT1 and TINE HUYSE 1 laboratory of Animal Diversity and Systematics, Department of Biology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Ch. Deberiotstraat 32, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium 2Institute of Inland Waters, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, PO Box 712, 190 13, Anavyssos, Greece 3Laboratory of Forensic Genetics and Molecular Archaeology, UZ Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium 4Department of Human Genetics, Campus Gasthuisberg, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium Received 30 June 2011; revised 27 July 2011; accepted for publication 27 July 2011 Within the Atlantic-Mediterranean region, the ‘sand gobies’ are abundant and widespread, and play an important role in marine, brackish, and freshwater ecosystems. They include the smallest European freshwater fish, Economidichthys trichonis, which is threatened by habitat loss and pollution, as are several other sand gobies. Key to good conservation management is an accurate account of the number of evolutionary significant units. Nevertheless, many taxonomic and evolutionary questions remain unresolved within the clade, and molecular studies are lacking, especially in the Balkans. Using partial 12S and 16S mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequences of 96 specimens of at least eight nominal species (both freshwater and marine populations), we assess species relationships and compare molecular and morphological data.
    [Show full text]
  • Universal Set of Primers for DNA Identification of Alien Fish Species in Central Russia (Volga-Kama Region)
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 6 July 2021 doi:10.20944/preprints202107.0151.v1 Article Universal Set of Primers for DNA Identification of Alien Fish Species in Central Russia (Volga-Kama region) Dmitry P. Karabanov 1,*, Eugenia I. Bekker 2, Dmitry D. Pavlov 1, Elena A. Borovikova 1, Yulia V. Kodukhova 1, and Alexey A. Kotov 2,* 1 I. D. Papanin Institute for Biology of Inland Waters of Russian Academy of Sciences, Borok Yaroslavl Area, 152742, Russia; [email protected] 2 A. N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Prospect 33, Moscow 119071, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (DPK), [email protected] (AAK) Abstract: Reliable species identification is critical for detection and monitoring of biological inva- sions. In this study, we propose four sets of primers for efficient amplification of several loci, in- cluding the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase-c (COI) subunit I gene which is a basis for DNA barcoding. This set of primers gives a shorter product which can be used in high-throughput se- quencing systems for metabarcoding purposes. Another mitochondrial locus encoding the large ribosomal subunit (16S) may be useful to study the population structure and as an additional source of information in the metabarcoding of communities. We propose to use a set of primers for the nuclear locus of the small ribosomal subunit (18S) as a positive control and to verify the results of the barcoding. Our proposed sets of primers demonstrate a high amplification efficiency and a high specificity both for freshwater alien and indigenous fishes.
    [Show full text]
  • Sinelobus Stanfordi (Richardson, 1901): a New Crustacean Invader in Europe
    Aquatic Invasions (2009) Volume 4, Issue 4: 703-711 DOI 10.3391/ai.2009.4.4.20 © 2009 The Author(s) Journal compilation © 2009 REABIC (http://www.reabic.net) This is an Open Access article Short communication Sinelobus stanfordi (Richardson, 1901): A new crustacean invader in Europe Ton van Haaren1* and Jan Soors2 1Grontmij|AquaSense, Sciencepark 116, 1090 HC Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Kliniekstraat 25, 1070 Brussel, Belgium Email: [email protected], [email protected] *Corresponding author Received 29 May 2009; accepted in revised form 14 September 2009; published online 29 September 2009 Abstract This short note reports on the first European records of Sinelobus stanfordi (Crustacea: Tanaidacea: Tanaidae). The species has been recorded from five different water bodies in the Dutch coastal area and in the docks of the Belgian harbour of Antwerp. S. stanfordi was until now not known to inhabit (North-) European coasts and estuaries. It is thus very likely that its origin is non-indigenous. Key words: Sinelobus stanfordi, The Netherlands, Belgium, estuaries, littoral From the Dutch and Belgian North Sea coast substrate in the Antwerp harbour, situated in the only a few species of Tanaidacea have been mesohaline part of the Schelde-estuary. All of recorded. For Apseudes talpa (Montagu, 1808) these observations were in estuarine conditions (Apseudidae) and both Heterotanais oerstedi with more or less marine influence. (Krøyer, 1842) and Leptochelia dubia (Krøyer, Many factors make it highly likely that this 1842) (Leptocheliidae) there are no known small tanaid is a very recent newcomer in recent records since Holthuis (1956) recorded European waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Neogobius Pallasi (Caspian Monkey Goby) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Caspian Monkey Goby (Neogobius pallasi) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, June 2019 Revised, July 2019 Web Version, 11/19/2019 Photo: K. Abbasi. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0. Available: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Neogobius_pallasi.jpg. (June 2019). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2019): “Europe and Asia: Caspian basin; common in Volga drainage, upriver to Moscow.” According to Froese and Pauly (2019), N. pallasi is native to the countries of Russia and Kazakhstan. Neilson and Stepien (2011) report N. pallasi as native to the Caspian Sea basin in Azerbaijan. Esmaeili et al. (2014) report N. pallasi as native to the Caspian Sea basin in Iran. Status in the United States This species has not been reported as introduced or established in the United States. There is no indication that this species is in trade in the United States. Means of Introductions in the United States This species has not been reported as introduced or established in the United States. 1 Remarks A previous version of this ERSS was published in 2014. From Neilson and Stepien (2011): “Both genetic and morphological data strongly supported two species of monkey gobies that were formerly identified as subspecies: N. fluviatilis in the Black Sea basin, Don and Volga Rivers, and the Kumo-Manych Depression, and Neogobius pallasi in the Caspian Sea and Volga River delta. Genetic origins of introduced N. fluviatilis populations indicated a common invasion pathway shared with other introduced Ponto-Caspian fishes and invertebrates.” From Grabowska (2014): “The monkey goby [Neogobius fluviatilis] is considered to be one of the most successful fish invaders in European inland waters in recent decades (Copp et al., 2005).” Neogobius pallasi has only recently been declared as a species separate from Neogobius fluviatilis (Neilson and Stepien 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Exotic Species in the Aegean, Marmara, Black, Azov and Caspian Seas
    EXOTIC SPECIES IN THE AEGEAN, MARMARA, BLACK, AZOV AND CASPIAN SEAS Edited by Yuvenaly ZAITSEV and Bayram ÖZTÜRK EXOTIC SPECIES IN THE AEGEAN, MARMARA, BLACK, AZOV AND CASPIAN SEAS All rights are reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior permission from the Turkish Marine Research Foundation (TÜDAV) Copyright :Türk Deniz Araştırmaları Vakfı (Turkish Marine Research Foundation) ISBN :975-97132-2-5 This publication should be cited as follows: Zaitsev Yu. and Öztürk B.(Eds) Exotic Species in the Aegean, Marmara, Black, Azov and Caspian Seas. Published by Turkish Marine Research Foundation, Istanbul, TURKEY, 2001, 267 pp. Türk Deniz Araştırmaları Vakfı (TÜDAV) P.K 10 Beykoz-İSTANBUL-TURKEY Tel:0216 424 07 72 Fax:0216 424 07 71 E-mail :[email protected] http://www.tudav.org Printed by Ofis Grafik Matbaa A.Ş. / İstanbul -Tel: 0212 266 54 56 Contributors Prof. Abdul Guseinali Kasymov, Caspian Biological Station, Institute of Zoology, Azerbaijan Academy of Sciences. Baku, Azerbaijan Dr. Ahmet Kıdeys, Middle East Technical University, Erdemli.İçel, Turkey Dr. Ahmet . N. Tarkan, University of Istanbul, Faculty of Fisheries. Istanbul, Turkey. Prof. Bayram Ozturk, University of Istanbul, Faculty of Fisheries and Turkish Marine Research Foundation, Istanbul, Turkey. Dr. Boris Alexandrov, Odessa Branch, Institute of Biology of Southern Seas, National Academy of Ukraine. Odessa, Ukraine. Dr. Firdauz Shakirova, National Institute of Deserts, Flora and Fauna, Ministry of Nature Use and Environmental Protection of Turkmenistan. Ashgabat, Turkmenistan. Dr. Galina Minicheva, Odessa Branch, Institute of Biology of Southern Seas, National Academy of Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Dynamics and Feeding Ecology of the Invasive Caucasian Dwarf Goby, Knipowitschia Caucasica, in a Freshwater Habitat in Ukraine
    Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst. 2020, 421, 26 Knowledge & © A. Didenko et al., Published by EDP Sciences 2020 Management of Aquatic https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2020018 Ecosystems Journal fully supported by Office www.kmae-journal.org français de la biodiversité RESEARCH PAPER Population dynamics and feeding ecology of the invasive Caucasian dwarf goby, Knipowitschia caucasica, in a freshwater habitat in Ukraine Alexander Didenko1,*, Igor Buzevych1, Yuriy Volikov2, Svitlana Kruzhylina1 and Alexander Gurbyk1 1 Institute of Fisheries of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Obukhivska St. 135, 03164 Kyiv, Ukraine 2 Institute of Hydrobiology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Prospekt Geroiv Stalingradu, 12, 04210 Kyiv, Ukraine Received: 25 March 2020 / Accepted: 9 May 2020 Abstract – Population dynamics and feeding patterns of invasive Knipowitschia caucasica were studied in the littoral zone of the lower Stugna River. The abundances of this goby showed significant inter-annual and seasonal fluctuations. The studied population of K. caucasica was represented by two age groups (0 and I). Fish die after their first breeding season. In total, 58 prey items were identified in the diet of K. caucasica at the sampling site. The most abundant prey were copepods and cladocerans, while the most frequently encountered prey were copepods and chironomid larvae. Copepods were represented mainly by Cyclopoidae. Cladocerans included 21 taxa, among which the most abundant were Diaphanosoma sp., Acroperus harpae, and Disparalona rostrata; chironomids included 22 taxa, among which the most abundant was Cricotopus sylvestris. The diet composition showed seasonal dynamics, where copepods predominated in January to April and in August-September, chironomid larvae were especially important in May to July, while cladocerans were most important in November-December.
    [Show full text]
  • The Zoocenosis of the Aral Sea: Six Decades of Fast-Paced Change
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3807-z REVIEW ARTICLE The zoocenosis of the Aral Sea: six decades of fast-paced change Nikolay Vasilevich Aladin1 & Valentina Ivanovna Gontar1 & Ljubov Vasilevna Zhakova1 & Igor Svetozarovich Plotnikov1 & Alexey Olegovich Smurov1 & Piotr Rzymski2 & Piotr Klimaszyk3 Received: 29 June 2018 /Accepted: 19 November 2018 # The Author(s) 2018 Abstract During the last six decades, the water level of the Aral Sea, once one of the largest lakes in the world, has experienced a major human-driven regression followed by significant changes in salinity. These fast-paced alterations were initiated by the diversion of two rivers—the Amu Darya and Syr Darya—key players in the regulation of the water balance of the Aral Sea. Consequently, biological modifications took place leading to severe changes of the zoocenosis. This paper reviews the changes that have affected communities of fish and aquatic invertebrates in the Aral Sea since the 1950s. The reported alterations in biodiversity not only represent a natural response to a decrease in water level and a subsequent increase in salinity but also effects of non- native species introduction. The future prospects for invertebrates and fish in the Aral Sea, assuming that initiated restoration work is continued, are also discussed in this paper. Keywords Aral Sea . Ecological disaster . Ichthyofauna . Aquatic macroinvertebrates . Aquatic restoration Introduction largelyexceededbyevaporation,bothrivers,theonlysur- face water inflows
    [Show full text]
  • Current and Potential Aquatic Invasive Species in Ontario and the Great Lakes Region: a Compilation of Ecological Information
    Science and Research Information Report IR-16 Current and potential aquatic invasive species in Ontario and the Great Lakes region: A compilation of ecological information Science and Research Information Report IR-16 Current and potential aquatic invasive species in Ontario and the Great Lakes region: A compilation of ecological information Elizabeth C. Hatton1, Jeffrey D. Buckley1, Shannon A. Fera1,2, Samantha Henry1, Len M. Hunt3, D. Andrew R. Drake4 and Timothy B. Johnson1 1 Aquatic Research and Development Section, Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF), 41 Hatchery Lane, Picton, ON K0K 2T0 2 Current address: Fisheries Section, Species Conservation Policy Branch, MNRF, 300 Water Street, Peterborough, ON K9J 8M5 3 Centre for Northern Forest Ecosystem Research, MNRF, 103-421 James St S, Thunder Bay, ON P7E 2V6 4 Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 867 Lakeshore Road, Burlington, ON L7S 1A1 2019 Science and Research Branch Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry © 2019, Queen’s Printer for Ontario Copies of this publication are available from [email protected]. Cette publication hautement spécialisée, Current and Potential Aquatic Invasive Species in Ontario and the Great Lakes Region: A Compilation of Ecological Information, n’est disponible qu’en anglais conformément au Règlement 671/92, selon lequel il n’est pas obligatoire de la traduire en vertu de la Loi sur les services en français. Pour obtenir des renseignements en français, veuillez communiquer avec le ministère des Richesses naturelles et des Forêts au [email protected]. Some of the information in this document may not be compatible with assistive technologies.
    [Show full text]