DOCSLIB.ORG

Analecta Romana Instituti Danici Xxxvii

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Analecta Romana Instituti Danici Xxxvii ANALECTA ROMANA INSTITUTI DANICI XXXVII ANALECTA ROMANA INSTITUTI DANICI XXXVII 2012 ROMAE MMXII ANALECTA ROMANA INSTITUTI DANICI XXXIV © 2012 Accademia di Danimarca ISSN 2035-2506 Published with the support of a grant from: Det Frie Forskningsråd / Kultur og Kommunikation SCIENTIFIC BOARD Ove Hornby (Bestyrelsesformand, Det Danske Institut i Rom) Maria Fabricius Hansen (Ny Carlsbergfondet) Thomas Harder (Forfatter/writer/scrittore) Michael Herslund (Copenhagen Business School) Hanne Jansen (Københavns Universitet) Hannemarie Ragn Jensen (Københavns Universitet) Kurt Villads Jensen (Syddansk Universitet) Mogens Nykjær (Aarhus Universitet) Vinnie Nørskov (Aarhus Universitet) Birger Riis-Jørgensen (Den Danske Ambassade i Rom) Niels Rosing-Schow (Det Kgl. Danske Musikkonservatorium) Poul Schülein (Arkitema, København) Lene Schøsler (Københavns Universitet) EDITORIAL BOARD Marianne Pade (Chair of Editorial Board, Det Danske Institut i Rom) Patrick Kragelund (Danmarks Kunstbibliotek) Carsten Hjort Lange (Det Danske Institut i Rom) Gitte Lønstrup Dal Santo (Det Danske Institut i Rom) Gert Sørensen (Københavns Universitet) Maria Adelaide Zocchi (Det Danske Institut i Rom) Analecta Romana Instituti Danici. — Vol. I (1960) — . Copenhagen: Munksgaard. From 1985: Rome, «L’ERMA» di Bretschneider. From 2007 (online): Accademia di Danimarca ANALECTA ROMANA INSTITUTI DANICI encourages scholarly contributions within the Academy’s research fields. All contributions will be peer reviewed. Manuscripts to be considered for publication should be sent to: accademia@acdan.it Authors are requested to consult the journal’s guidelines at www.acdan.it Contents THOMAS GRANE: Pliny and the wandering mountain. A new interpretation of Pliny’s account of the northern Barbaricum with an archaeological comment 7 CARSTEN HJORT LANGE: Constantine’s Civil War Triumph of AD 312 and the Adaptability of Triumphal Tradition 29 LUIGI SILVANO: Saltationes: A Notebook on Ancient Dance by Angelo Poliziano 55 KNUD ARNE JüRGENSEN: “Con placido sembiante….” L’opera Il Valdemaro di Domenico Sarro (Roma, 1726) 79 KAREN ASCANI: Il carteggio di Georg Zoëga (1755-1809) mediatore fra Roma e la Danimarca 151 EMMA SALLING: Relations between the Danish Academy of Fine Arts and the Accademia di S. Luca in Rome during the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries 159 Constantine’s Civil War Triumph of AD 312 and the Adaptability of Triumphal Tradition BY CARSTEN HJORT LANGE Abstract. There existed an ancient consensus on the awarding of triumphs, clearly apparent during the Late Republic and Early Empire: a general could expect to triumph after a civil war victory if it could also be represented as being over a foreign enemy. A triumph after a victory in an exclusively civil war was understood as being in clear breach of traditional practices. This consensus continued during the Later Roman Empire. Nevertheless, as this paper will argue, Constantine may have taken to Caesar’s final triumph, which, celebrating his victory over Pompeius’ sons at Munda in 45 BC, was only over civil opponents, as a precedent. It is clear that Constantine did not conceal the civil war aspect of his victory, which is still visible today on the arch of Constantine, in particular on its inscription. By examining dealings in the immediate aftermath of civil conflicts, with a focus on Constantine, this paper will also consider the differences and similarities between two central Roman celebrations, the triumph and the adventus. The key distinguishing feature may have been that a triumph usually involved the display of spoils, while an adventus did not; and the assumption that the distinction between the two celebrations became virtually elided is wrong. Furthermore, the sacrifice on the Capitol is not a conclusive diagnostic, as it was often a feature of the non-triumphal adventus. The triumph was part of the rhetoric of political legitimation for the victor: the rules of triumph were flexible to some extent, but significantly, the ritual itself often varied. While there has been a surge of interest in is hardly visible today, but Augustus’ arch the Roman triumph in recent years,1 those clearly belonged to this group, as Actium was of the post-Augustan period have received both a foreign and a civil war.4 The arches surprisingly little attention.2 During the Late were built to legitimise new rulers and their Republic a convention arose that a triumph dynasties by proclaiming their honorands’ could not be awarded for victories in a civil war. virtues, commemorating their achievements, Elsewhere I have examined this convention at and presenting a visual reminder of their some length, concluding that a commander success. Flaig suggests that the Principate itself usually could not expect to triumph after possessed legitimacy, whereas the individual an exclusively civil war, but only a civil war emperors received only an acceptance, and that could also be represented as foreign; it victory in war was central in the establishment was by nature of their external character of an emperor’s pre-eminence.5 This was that these conflicts qualified for a triumph.3 perhaps never more crucial than in the Significantly, the civil war aspect (victoria civilis) aftermath of a civil war, when it functioned as of the triumphs was rarely denied. a means of justification within post-civil-war The three triumphal arches still standing arrangements. in the centre of Rome all commemorate the This paper will examine these tensions victors of lengthy civil wars (Titus, Septimius within post-civil-war dealings, focusing on Severus and Constantine). The arch of Constantine in particular, and in doing so will Actium (from 19 BC: Actium-Parthian-arch) also consider the differences and similarities 30 CARSTEN HJORT LANGE between two central Roman celebrations, Further evidence includes Cicero’s Philippics the triumph and the adventus.6 Constantine’s (14.22-24; 22: “numquam enim in civili triumph can only be properly understood, bello supplicatio decreta est” [“for no public it will be claimed, if we accept that the thanksgiving has ever been voted in a civil triumph was a ritual with a history, defined by war”]; Lucan, who at the start of his poem conventions, dating to the Republican period.7 laments that the civil wars which were to The disputed triumph of Constantine in 312, be his theme were wars in which no general I suggest, must be judged in the light of the could win a triumph (1.12); and Florus Late Republican convention on civil war and (2.10.1, 9), referring to Pompeius’ Spanish triumph. triumph. Plutarch (Caes. 56.7-9) and Dio Cassius (42.18.1, 43.42.1) mention the matter in relation to Caesar’s triumphs, Dio Cassius Civil war and Triumphs during the Later Roman (51.19.5) does so also in respect to Octavian’s, Empire while Tacitus (Hist. 4.4.2) reports the grant The chief ancient source which provides an of ornamenta triumphalia to Vespasian’s overview of the rules and customary practice commanders as in breach of the rule. relating to triumphs and the question of civil There was, or so it would seem, an ancient war is the chapter which Valerius Maximus (2.8) consensus on the matter of the triumph. devotes to the topic as part of his treatment of The consensus was however flexible enough disciplina militaris.8 There can be no doubt that only to deny a commander a triumph after he used earlier sources contemporary with the an exclusively civil war: it remained possible civil wars of the Late Republic. His primary to triumph after a civil war that could also evidence is probably Varro.9 The last section of be represented as foreign. This consensus Valerius Maximus’ chapter (2.8.7) asserts that continued during the Later Roman Empire, no supplicationes, ovations or triumphs had ever and scruples regarding the celebration of been held for a civil war: triumphs after civil wars were always present. Such attitudes appear in the panegyric of 321 Verum quamvis quis praeclaras res (Nazarius), presented in Rome in Constantine’s maximeque utiles rei publicae civili absence, reflecting on the celebrations of 312 bello gessisset, imperator tamen eo (Pan. Lat. 4(10).31.1-3):10 nomine appellatus non est, neque ullae supplicationes decretae sunt, neque aut Non agebantur quidem ante currum ovans aut curru triumphavit, quia, ut vincti duces sed incedebat tandem soluta necessariae istae, ita lugubres semper nobilitas. Non coniecti in carcerem existimatae sunt victoriae, utpote non barbari sed educti e carcere consulares. externo sed domestico partae cruore. Non captiui alienigenae introitum illum honestauerunt sed Roma iam libera. No man, however, though he might Nil ex hostico accepit sed se ipsam have accomplished great things recuperavit, nec praeda auctior facta eminently useful to the commonwealth est sed esse praeda desivit et, quo nil in a civil war, was given the title of adici ad gloriae magnitudinem [maius] imperator on that account, nor were any potest, imperium recepit quae seruitium thanksgivings decreed, nor did such a sustinebat. Duci sane omnibus one triumph either in ovation or with videbantur subacta uitiorum agmina chariot, for such victories have ever quae Vrbem grauiter obsederant:… been accounted as grievous, as they were necessary, because they were won Leaders in chains were not driven by domestic not foreign blood. before the chariot, but the nobility CONSTANTINE’S CIVIL WAR TRIUMPH 31 marched along, freed at last. Barbarians were not cast into prison but ex-consuls Haec dum per eoas partes et Gallias were let out of it. Captive foreigners pro captu temporum disponuntur, did not adorn that entrance but Rome Constantius quasi cluso Iani templo now free. She received nothing of an stratisque hostibus cunctis, Romam enemy’s but recovered her own self, she visere gestiebat, post Magnenti exitium was not enriched by spoils but ceased to absque nomine ex sanguine Romano be despoiled and – nothing greater can triumphaturus. Nec enim gentem ullam be added to the magnitude of her glory bella cientem per se superavit, aut victam – she who had endured slavery got back fortitudine suorum comperit ducum, vel her command.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen
    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/197438 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2019-09-09 and may be subject to change. Studies ANCIENT HISTORY “THE USURPING PRINCEPS”: MAXENTIUS’ IMAGE AND ITS CONSTANTINIAN LEGACY Abstract: This article deals with self-representation of Maxentius, who ruled over Italy and North Africa between 306 and 312. It focuses on the imagery and language that was distributed through coins and portraits during Maxentius’ reign, as well as their reception under Constantine immediately after the Battle of the Milvian Bridge (312). It argues that Maxentius revitalized the tradition of a princeps at Rome in order to play upon sentiments of neglect felt at Rome and the time. In coinage, this was most explicitly done through the unprecedented use of the princeps title on the obverse, which initially may Sven Betjes have caused a misunderstanding in the more distant parts of the Maxentian Institute for Historical, Literary and Cultural Studies, realm. The idea of the princeps was captivated in portraiture through visual Radboud University similarities with revered emperors, especially with Trajan, and through s.betjes@let.ru.nl insertion of Maxentius’ portraits in traditional togate capite velato. When Constantine defeated Maxentius in 312, he took over some of the imagery Sam Heijnen and language that had been employed by his deceased adversary. Constantine, Institute for Historical, Literary and Cultural Studies, too, presented himself as a princeps.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Roman Events
    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
    [Show full text]
  • Accommodating Political Change Under the Tetrarchy (293–306)
    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/213252 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2021-10-05 and may be subject to change. Klio 2019; 101(2): 610–639 Olivier Hekster – Sven Betjes – Sam Heijnen – Ketty Iannantuono – Dennis Jussen – Erika Manders – Daniel Syrbe* Accommodating Political Change under the Tetrarchy (293–306) https://doi.org/10.1515/klio-2019-0042 Summary: This article seeks to address the question how the Tetrarchic system of four rulers could be presented as legitimate in a society that had never seen this political constellation before. What were the different modes of presenting Tetrar- chic rule and how did they help in making the new system acceptable? The article argues that new power structures needed to be formulated in familiar terms, not only for the rulers to legitimate their position, but also for the ruled to understand such new systems. As a result, imperial messages during the Tetrarchic period were strongly influenced by traditional modes of representation from earlier pe- riods. Traditions which were inherent in specific media and locations were deter- mining factors for the way in which a new political system could be presented. The result was a much less coherent ideological Tetrarchic message than is often assumed. The image of group identity was regularly lost in a more complex and messy mode of formulating power. The new and innovative aspects of a collegiate rule by four emperors was less important than linking the power of those rulers to what was traditionally expected of the portrayal of Roman emperorship.
    [Show full text]
  • SPOLIA. DAMNATIO and RENOVATIO MEMORIAE Dale
    "SPOLIA. DAMNATIO" AND "RENOVATIO MEMORIAE" Author(s): Dale Kinney Source: Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome, Vol. 42 (1997), pp. 117-148 Published by: University of Michigan Press for the American Academy in Rome Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4238749 Accessed: 26/07/2010 09:43 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=aarome. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. American Academy in Rome and University of Michigan Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome. http://www.jstor.org SPOLIA.DAMNATIO AND RENOVATIOMEMORIAE Dale Kinney L ike most aspects of Roman artistic practice, the introductionof spolia occurred in si- lence.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Tetrarchic Relief from Nicomedia: Embracing Emperors Tuna Şare Ağtürk Open Access on AJA Online
    article A New Tetrarchic Relief from Nicomedia: Embracing Emperors tuna Şare ağtürk Open Access on AJA Online Ancient Nicomedia, the most important capital of the eastern Roman empire during the Tetrarchy, now lies below the modern industrial city of İzmit. The first systematic archaeological research on Diocletian’s capital, supported with a grant from The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK), examines a series of monu- mental reliefs and statues from a terraced imperial cult complex, found in the Çukurbağ district at the heart of modern İzmit. Excavations have brought to light more than 30 re- lief panels (average ht. 1.0 m x wdth. 1.5 m), the only surviving examples of Late Roman state reliefs that have extensive paint preserved on them. The panels illuminate multiple aspects of the art of the period, including the brightly colored costumes and the new and distinctive self-representation of the tetrarchic emperors and their administration. In this article, one of these relief panels, with a representation of two emperors embracing, is discussed as the precursor to the well-known porphyry Tetrarchs from Venice and the Vatican. It is argued that the relief panel is part of a larger adventus scene that shows the meeting of the two diarchs, Diocletian and Maximian, and thus dates from slightly before the onset of Tetrarchy in 293 C.E.1 introduction Scenes of nearly identical coemperors and their Caesars embracing—perhaps the most emblematic motif in tetrarchic art—are well known from the por- phyry examples in Venice and the Vatican (figs. 1, 2).2 This motif is often seen as an early example of the rejection of the classical tradition in favor of the increasingly abstracted, symbolic, and rigid representations that would 1 This article stems from the Çukurbağ Archaeological Project, a large ongoing proj- ect conducted with the permission of the Kocaeli Museum and the Turkish Ministry of Culture and supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) (Project 115K242).
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Imperial Triumphal Arches
    Roman Imperial Triumphal Arches SARAH MIDFORD which you could have seen were the cattle of the Volcinians, the flocks of the Sabines, the wagons of the Gauls, the broken arms of the Samnites’ riumphal arches were permanent monuments (Florus, 1.13.26). After the victory over Pyrrhus, constructed to commemorate an ephemeral triumphal processions are said to have contained TRoman triumphal procession. Arches were ‘Molossians, Thessalonians, Macedonians, erected in Rome during the republican period, Bruttians, Apulians and Lucanians… statues of although because they were predominately gold and charming Tarentine painted panels’ made from wood, none have survived. During (Florus, 1.13.27). As time went on and Rome the imperial period arches were constructed conquered more lands, spoils of war including from more durable materials including concrete arms, money, precious metals and jewels, and marble. The Roman triumphal arches still statuary and paintings, trees, people, and kings standing today were constructed between the were brought to Rome. Triumphal processions first and fourth centuries CE. Each one conveys were expressions of Roman military prowess an imperialistic sentiment, although, the reason and glory, and the more glorious the spoils the for their construction was not consistently more powerful and glorious Rome appeared military victory, as one might presume. to be. This projection of power and glory was extended to the triumphing general (the The location, sculptural program and triumphator) architectural execution of each
    [Show full text]
  • Masons, Materials, and Machinery: Logistical Challenges in Roman
    Masons, Materials, and Machinery: Logistical Challenges in Roman Building Brian Sahotsky The Augustan-era poet Tibullus records an episode in the life of a Republican merchant, “His fancy turns to foreign marbles, and through the trembling city his column is carried by one thousand sturdy pairs of oxen.”1 By sheathing Rome in marble during the early 1st c. A.D. Augustus essentially prefigured three centuries of colossal stone construction in the capital.2 Subsequent emperors favored massive monolithic columns, metaphorically equating their size and distinctiveness with the might and reach of the empire. These exotic marbles, pried from quarries in peripheral locales like Egypt and Anatolia, demonstrated that Rome could bring wealth from any of its territories to showcase in the capital. Although these marble monoliths were a symbol for the supremacy of Rome, the real power was displayed in their erection.3 Key imperial construction projects developed into major spectacles, and the convoy of marble columns and cartloads of building materials to the building site shook the ground and commanded attention. One such case study from the Tetrarchic period is the building of the great Basilica of Maxentius at the southern end of the Roman Forum.4 In addition to its vast quantity of brick and concrete, the plans for the basilica specified eight Proconnesian marble columns that weighed in excess of 90 tons. These columns contained the perfect means to put on a dramatic show of Roman engineering and organizational expertise. The resulting parade of stone and brick to the Forum glorified the ambitious building program of the Emperor, and gave the people of Rome a spectacle that had been absent in the capital for nearly a hundred years.5 1 Tibullus, Elegiae, 2.3.43-44.
    [Show full text]
  • Space, Ritual, Event: Constantine's Jubilee of 326 and Its Implications on Urban Space
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2013 Space, Ritual, Event: Constantine's Jubilee of 326 and its Implications On Urban Space Brian Christopher Doherty bdoherty@utk.edu Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Architectural History and Criticism Commons, and the Urban, Community and Regional Planning Commons Recommended Citation Doherty, Brian Christopher, "Space, Ritual, Event: Constantine's Jubilee of 326 and its Implications On Urban Space. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2013. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/2409 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact trace@utk.edu. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Brian Christopher Doherty entitled "Space, Ritual, Event: Constantine's Jubilee of 326 and its Implications On Urban Space." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Architecture, with a major in Architecture. Gregor A. Kalas, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Avigail Sachs, Thomas K. Davis Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) Space, Ritual, Event: Constantine's Jubilee of 326 and its Implications On Urban Space A Thesis presented for the the Master of Architecture Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Brian Christopher Doherty August 2013 ABSTRACT Architecture has been characterized as the study of space.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cult of Vesta in the Roman World Thesis
    Open Research Online The Open University’s repository of research publications and other research outputs The cult of Vesta in the Roman world Thesis How to cite: Cobb, Jennifer Mary (1984). The cult of Vesta in the Roman world. MPhil thesis The Open University. For guidance on citations see FAQs. c 1983 The Author https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Version: Version of Record Link(s) to article on publisher’s website: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21954/ou.ro.0000f956 Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. oro.open.ac.uk UNRESTS !CTED MISS JENNIFER MARY COBB B.A.(LONDON) THE CULT OF VESTA IN THE ROMAN WORLD SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF M.PHIL FACULTY OF ARTS : CLASSICAL STUDIES DATE OF SUBMISSION : 27 D4AY 19 83 i ) a - C L crf^ ; / 4 - M<3>cA/ J P ro Q u e st N um ber: 27777207 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent on the quality of the copy submitted. in the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 27777207 Published by ProQuest LLC (2020). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. Ail Rights Reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • TOWARDS a NEW HONORIFIC COLUMN: the COLUMN of CONSTANTINE in EARLY BYZANTINE URBAN LANDSCAPE (1) Pelin YONCACI ARSLAN*
    TOWARDSMETU JFA 2016/1A NEW HONORIFIC COLUMN DOI:METU 10.4305/METU.JFA.2016.1.5 JFA 2016/1 121 (33:1) 121-145 TOWARDS A NEW HONORIFIC COLUMN: THE COLUMN OF CONSTANTINE IN EARLY BYZANTINE URBAN LANDSCAPE (1) Pelin YONCACI ARSLAN* Received: 19.10.2015; Final Text: 09.03.2016 INTRODUCTION Keywords: Column of Constantine; Early Byzantine Constantinople; Byzantine urban In the summer of 324, Constantine besieged the city of Roman Byzantion to history; the urban skyline; imageability; capture Licinius after the Battle of Adrianople 2( ). During the two-month visibility long siege, the emperor stayed in a military camp built on the second 1. This paper is partially based on the hill of the promontory, outside the main land gate built by Septimus PhD dissertation titled “Christianizing the Skyline: Appropriation of the Pagan Severus in the second century AD. At the time when the city was falling, Honorary Column in Early Constantinople” Licinius escaped to the opposite shores of the Bosporus to Chrysopolis submitted in 2015 to UCLA, Architecture and Urban Design. (Üsküdar). In the battle of Chrysopolis on September 18, 324, Licinius was defeated and lost his imperial titles as well as the East of the Empire 2. Zos., Hist. nov., II.22.3-7. (3). Hence, with the elimination of his rival, Constantine became the 3. Zos., Hist. nov., II. 33-36. sole ruler of the Roman Empire. To perpetuate the memory of his naval 4. B. Ward-Perkins 2012, 53. In the early victory, or what Krautheimer (1983, 42) suggested, to commemorate the years of its foundation, Constantinople was designated altera Roma (the other Rome) unification of the Roman Empire under one ruler, Constantine refounded by the Latin poet Porphyrius in one of his the city of Byzantion as his own capital.
    [Show full text]
  • Maternal Megalomania Langford, Julie
    Maternal Megalomania Langford, Julie Published by Johns Hopkins University Press Langford, Julie. Maternal Megalomania: Julia Domna and the Imperial Politics of Motherhood. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013. Project MUSE. doi:10.1353/book.22479. https://muse.jhu.edu/. For additional information about this book https://muse.jhu.edu/book/22479 [ Access provided at 26 Sep 2021 19:07 GMT with no institutional affiliation ] This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. MATERNAL MEGALOMANIA This page intentionally left blank MATERNAL MEGALOMANIA Julia Domna and the Imperial Politics of Motherhood JULIE LANGFORD The Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore © 2013 The Johns Hopkins University Press All rights reserved. Published 2013 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper 2 4 6 8 9 7 5 3 1 The Johns Hopkins University Press 2715 North Charles Street Baltimore, Maryland 21218-4363 www.press.jhu.edu Library of Congress Cataloging–in–Publication Data Langford, Julie, 1967– Maternal megalomania : Julia Domna and the imperial politics of motherhood / Julie Langford. pages cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 978-1-4214-0847-7 (hardcover : acid-free paper) — isbn 1-4214-0847-3 (hardcover : acid-free paper) – isbn 978-1-4214-0848-4 (electronic) — isbn 1-4214-0848-1 (electronic) 1. Julia Domna, Empress, consort of Severus, Lucius Septimius, Emperor of Rome, d. 217. 2. Julia Domna, Empress, consort of Severus, Lucius Septimius, Emperor of Rome, d. 217—Public opinion. 3. Rome—History—Severans, 193–235. 4. Rome—Politics and government—30 b.c.–284 a.d. 5. Motherhood—Political aspects—Rome.
    [Show full text]
  • Renovatio Urbis
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Lincoln Institutional Repository renovatio urbis Architecture, Urbanism and Ceremony in the Rome of Julius II Nicholas Temple 1 Agli amici di Antognano, Roma (Accademia Britannica) e Lincoln 2 Contents Illustration Credits Acknowledgements Introduction Chapter 1 - SIGN-POSTING PETER AND PAUL The Tiber’s Sacred Banks Peripheral Centres “inter duas metas” Papal Rivalries Chigi Chapel Chapter 2 - VIA GIULIA & PAPAL CORPORATISM The Politics of Order The Julian ‘Lapide’ Via Giulia The Legacy of Sixtus IV Quartière dei Banchi Via del Pellegrino, via Papale and via Recta Solenne Possesso and via Triumphalis Papal Corporatism Pons Neronianus and Porta Triumphalis Early Christian Precedents 3 Meta-Romuli and Serlio’s Scena Tragica Crossing Thresholds: Peter and Caesar The Papal ‘Hieroglyph’ and the Festa di Agone Chapter 3 - PALAZZO DEI TRIBUNALI and the Meaning of Justice sedes Iustitiae The Four Tribunals The Capitol and Communal/Cardinal’s Palace St Blaise and Justice Iustitia Cosmica Caesar and Iustitia pax Romana Chapter 4 – CORTILE DEL BELVEDERE, VIA DELLA LUNGARA and vita contemplativa “The Beautiful View” via suburbana/via sanctus Passage and Salvation Chapter 5 - ST. PETER’S BASILICA Orientation and Succession Transformations from Old to New Territorium Triumphale Sixtus IV and the Cappella del Coro Julius II and Caesar’s Ashes Janus and Peter 4 Janus Quadrifrons The Tegurium Chapter 6 - THE STANZA DELLA SEGNATURA A Testimony to a Golden Age Topographical and Geographical Connections in facultatibus Triune Symbolism Conversio St Bonaventure and the Itinerarium Mentis in Deum Justice and Poetry Mapping the Golden Age Conclusion - pons/facio: POPES AND BRIDGES The Julian ‘Project’ Pontifex Maximus Corpus Mysticum Raphael’s Portrait Notes Bibliography Index 5 Illustration Credits The author and publishers gratefully acknowledge the following for permission to reproduce images in the book.
    [Show full text]