DOCSLIB.ORG

Recommendations of Simon Commission the Simon Commission Report Consisted of Two Volumes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Recommendations of Simon Commission the Simon Commission Report Consisted of Two Volumes Useful Links Simon Commission - Modern History NCERT Notes for UPSC 1 Useful Links The Simon Commission also known as the Indian Statutory Commission, was an all-white Commis- sion under the chairmanship of Sir John Simon. In 1919, the British government declared that the Simon Commission would be sent to India to question the workings of the Indian Constitution. After ten years, the British government appointed the Commission in 1927. This was seen by Indi- ans as a deliberate attempt to insult them owing to non-inclusion of Indian leaders in the Commis- sion. Leaders like Gandhi, Nehru, Jinnah, Lala Lajpat Rai and more were against the onset of the Commission and stood for boycott of the Simon Commission. The Simon Commission UPSC is an important topic in terms of both prelims and mains perspective. Background of Simon Commission • In the Government of India Act of 1919, the Dyarchy system was introduced and it was also mentioned that a Commission would be appointed in India after ten year in order to study the constitutional reforms. • The Government of India Act of 1919 introduced the Dyarchy system and also mentioned a provision that a Commission would be appointed in India after ten year in order to study the constitutional reforms. • On November 8, 1927 the Simon Commission was set up by the British government, which was under the priministership of Stanley Baldwin at the time. • The Simon Commission was a seven-member Commission, which was also known as the Indian Statutory Commission. • The Simon Commission was an all-white Commission. The members of this Commission were British. It was criticised because there was not a single Indian representative in the Commission. • The purpose of this Commission was to recommend to the British government questions raised about constitutional reforms in British India. • The conservative British government, in power at the time, feared electoral defeat by the La- bour party of Britain. To protect their foothold in India, the British government appointed the Simon Commission in 1927; although the Commission was due only in 1929. • Lord Birkenhead, the Secretary of State for India, iterated that the Indians were not capable of formulating a scheme of constitutional reform that could be accepted by different sections of the Indian politics. • Thus, he was responsible for setting up the Simon Commission in the year 1927. Indian Response to Simon Commission Opposition Against Simon Commission • The Simon Commission 1927, provoked a large outrage among the Indian masses. • On February 3, 1928 (the day of the landing of Simon Commission) its members were at- tacked by a mob of protestors. • Country wide hartals and mass rallies were employed to show the outrage. • Wherever the Simon Commission went, people demonstrated black flags and chanted the slogan “Simon go back “ • In 1927, the Indian National Congress session under M.A. Ansari decided to boycott the Commission at every stage and in every form. • Jawaharlal Nehru passed a snap resolution stating complete independence as the goal of Congress. • Mahatma Gandhi did not participate in any movement though he was against the Simon Commission • Dr. Ambedkar demanded for the political protection of the depressed class. • Demonstrators were repressed by the police. Leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru, G.B.Pant were beaten up by the Police. 2 Useful Links • In October 1928, Lala Lajpat Rai received severe lathi charges on his chest and as a result he died on November 17, 1928 Support Towards Simon Commission • The liberals of Hindu Mahasabha supported the congress decision. • A section of Muslim league led by Muhammad Shafi at Lahore supported the government. • The Justice party in the South and Unionists in Punjab supported the Simon Commission. Recommendations of Simon Commission The Simon Commission report consisted of two volumes. Its major recommendations are as follows. • Abolition of Dyarchy • Establish representative government at the provinces • Governor should have discretionary power in administrative power and internal securities. • Provincial legislative council members should be increased. • Government of India to have complete control over the High court. • Retained separate communal electorates and extended to other communities • The Governor general to have complete power to appoint cabinet members. • No universal franchise • North west frontier provinces and Baluchistan should get local legislatures and rights to be represented at the center. • Sindh to be separated from Bombay and Burma to be separated from India. • Indian army should be Indianised. • Consultative council of greater India to be established. Impact of Simon Commission • New generation of youth made their first footprint in political actions. They were the most ac- tive participants of the protest. • The radical forces began to demand not only complete independence but also major socio economic reforms. • Lord Birkenhead’s challenge to produce an agreed constitution was accepted by several po- litical parties and paved the way for unity. Testbook is one of the top e-learning platforms for UPSC preparation. NCERT summaries, gist of important topics are curated by our experts targeting UPSC aspirants. Aspirants can also avail test series, mocks, quizzes and so on from our Testbook app. Download the Testbook app now ! Simon Commission FAQs Q1. What was the main aim of Simon Commission 1927? A1. The Simon Commission was appointed by the British government to make questions about the constitutional reforms in India and suggest ideas to the British government regarding the same. Q2. Why did Indians boycott the Simon Commission? A2. The Simon Commission was an all-white, seven membered Commission which had no Indians in it. The fact that no Indians were appointed to discuss upon Indias’ fitness for self government was seen as a deliberate insult to the Indians. Thus they boycotted the Simon Commission. 3 Useful Links Q3. Which party did not boycott the Simon Commission? A3. The Muslim league under Muhammad Shafi at Lahore, the Unionists in Punjab and the Justice party in the South did not boycott the Simon Commission. They supported the government. Q4. How was the Simon Commission treated? A4. When the Commission first landed in Bombay, there were country wide hartals and mass strikes. People demonstrated black flags and recited the slogan “Simon Go Back”. It was boycotted by the Congress, Muslim Lague under Jinnah and many other people. Q5.What were the recommendations of Simon Commission? A5.The recommendations of the Simon Commission were published in two volumes. The Important recommendations were abolition of dyarchy, establishing representative government at the prov- inces, Governor to have discretionary power in administrative power and internal securities, Govern- ment of India to have complete control over the High court. Q6. What was the slogan against the Simon Commission? A6. “Simon Go Back” was the slogan that was recited against the Simon Commission by the Masses. 4 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • School of Oriental and African Studies)
    BRITISH ATTITUDES T 0 INDIAN NATIONALISM 1922-1935 by Pillarisetti Sudhir (School of Oriental and African Studies) A thesis submitted to the University of London for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1984 ProQuest Number: 11010472 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 11010472 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 2 ABSTRACT This thesis is essentially an analysis of British attitudes towards Indian nationalism between 1922 and 1935. It rests upon the argument that attitudes created paradigms of perception which condi­ tioned responses to events and situations and thus helped to shape the contours of British policy in India. Although resistant to change, attitudes could be and were altered and the consequent para­ digm shift facilitated political change. Books, pamphlets, periodicals, newspapers, private papers of individuals, official records, and the records of some interest groups have been examined to re-create, as far as possible, the structure of beliefs and opinions that existed in Britain with re­ gard to Indian nationalism and its more concrete manifestations, and to discover the social, political, economic and intellectual roots of the beliefs and opinions.
    [Show full text]
  • Nehru and the New Commonwealth Eighth Lecture - by Sir Harold Wilson 2 November 1978
    Nehru and the New Commonwealth Eighth Lecture - by Sir Harold Wilson 2 November 1978 In accepting the honour of being invited to give the annual Nehru Memorial Lecture I do not have the advantage of most of those who have gone before me. Unlike Lord Butler and Krishna Menon, I was not born in India. Unlike some who have delivered the lecture, I did not know Nehru in the long years of struggle towards Independence. I did come to know him quite well through his visits to Commonwealth Conferences when I was a member of Clement Attlee's Cabinet. I remember those conferences to which you referred, 1948 and 1949, following which the Constituent Assembly in New Delhi ratified the declaration of the Prime Minister announcing India's adherence to the Commonwealth of Nations. In those days the Commonwealth Conference did not meet in the spacious surroundings of Marlborough House or Lancaster House, but round the cabinet table in Downing Street, with plenty of room not only for Prime Ministers but Foreign Ministers and officials as well. I remember the one I attended when first Nehru was there. There were nine nations represented there, including Southern Rhodesia which, while not technically and juridically independent, had a great measure of autonomy except in foreign affairs. Impressions of Nehru and Krishna Menon The Commonwealth Conferences I chaired as Prime Minister in the 1960s rose in number from 21 attenders to 36. The last one I attended in Jamaica in 1975 was attended by 33 countries, Nehru being absent, and since then two new hitherto dependent territories qualified for membership of the Commonwealth.
    [Show full text]
  • Class Notes Class: VIII Topic: the MAKING of NATIONAL MOVEMENT Subject: REVISION SHEETS
    Class Notes Class: VIII Topic: THE MAKING OF NATIONAL MOVEMENT Subject: REVISION SHEETS *1-20 Questions-to be solved in the notes copy *Map work -To be done in notes copy 1. Define Nationalism? A)Feeling of unity among nation B)Feeling of leadership C)Feeling of traitorship among nation D)None of these 2.Marathi newspaper ‘Kesari’ was edited by (a) Lala Lajpat Rai (b) Balgangadhar Tilak (c) Chitta Ranjan Das (d) Sarojini Naidu 3._____ was the founder of Congress. A) A O Hume B) Robert Clive C) Esther Hill D) Chris Paul 4._______ was the first movement successfully led by Gandhiji in India. A) Champaran Movement B) Natal Movement C) Quit India movement D) Punjab Movement 5.______ was one of the Congress leaders from Bengal with radical objectives. A) Bipin Chandra Pal B) Ravindranath Tagore C) Raja Rammohan Roy Absolutely prepared at home D) R C Mukherjee 6.”Freedom is our Birthright” slogan was given by ________. A) Lala Lajpat Rai B) Bal Gangadhar Tilak C) Laxmi Sehgal D) Mahatma Gandhi 7. _____ was one of the leaders of the Khilafat movement. A) Mohammad Ali B) Indira Gandhi C) Badshah Khan D) Jawaharlal Nehru 8.Forest Satyagrah was staged by peasants and tribals of Andhra’s _____ district. A) Guntur B) Hyderabad C) Kakatiya D) Saleh 9. Simon Commission was headed by _____. A) Lord Kingsford B) Lord Simon C) Lord Hastings D) Lord Curzon 10. ______ was reorganised by Jinnah after 1934. A) Muslim League B) Swatantra Party C) Communist Party D) Forward Block 11.
    [Show full text]
  • An Illustrious Life 1 2 Lala Lajpat Rai
    An Illustrious Life 1 2 Lala Lajpat Rai 1 An Illustrious Life reat leader, Lala Lajpat Rai (1865-1928) was an eminent author and politician, who is chiefly remembered as Ga leader in the national fight for freedom from the British Raj. He was popularly known as Punjab Kesari (The Caesar of Punjab). He was also the founder of Punjab National Bank and Lakshmi Insurance Company. Born in Dhudhika in Moga, on 28 January, in 1865 in a Hindu Vysya Family, Lajpat Rai created a career of reforming Indian policy through politics and writing. (When studying law in Lahore, he continued to practice Hinduism. He became a large believer in the idea that Hinduism, above nationality, was the pivotal point upon which an Indian lifestyle must be based). Hinduism, he believed, led to practices of peace to humanity, and the idea that when nationalist ideas were added to this peaceful belief system, a non-secular nation could be formed. His involvement with Hindu Mahasabhaite leaders gathered criticism from the Bharat Sabha as the Mahasabhas were anti-secularism, which did not conform with the system laid out by the Indian National Congress. This focus on Hindu practices in the subcontinent would ultimately lead him to the continuation of peaceful movements to create successful demonstrations for Indian independence. An Illustrious Life 3 As the need for partition and independence took an important turn for the possible, Lala Lajpat Rai's involvement became imperative to the Indian Independence Movement. His actions in anti-imperialist movements led to numerous arrests. He became an important member of the Arya Samaj.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian National Movement
    INDIAN NATIONAL MOVEMENT SKILLS Activity L.No Title of Lesson 8 Indian National Self Awareness, Critical thinking, Learn and Read more on Movement Problem Solving, Empathy the Freedom Fighters and enlist their contributions in Freedom Movements Meaning Anti-Colonial Movement gave rise to a feeling of Nationalism. In 1885 Indian National Congress was founded by A.O. Hume. There were phases of Naram Dal and Garam Dal. The Partition of Bengal in 1905 gave rise to a strong national movement. The Non Cooperation Movement, Civil Disobedience and finally Quit India Movement resulted in Independence of India and of course its partition. The Rise of Radical Nationalists Partition of Bengal In 1905, Curzon announced the partition of Bengal, z The Swadeshi movement was spearheaded by the trio – Lala Lajpat Rai, Bal Gangadhar an attempt to disrupt the growing national Tilak and Bipin Chandra Pal (Lal-Bal-Pal). movement in Bengal and divide the Hindus and The marked the beginning of a new face in Muslims of the region. This led rise to the Swadeshi India’s struggle for freedom. They represented Movement the Garam Dal. In 1907, the garam Dal led by Gopal Krishna Gokhale and Naram Dal Emergence of Gandhi separated. z Mohan Das Karamchand Gandhi’s first experiment in Satyagraha began at Champaran z In 1916 both Garam Dal and Naram Dal united with the efforts of Mrs. Annie Besant. in Bihar in 1917 when he inspired the peasants to struggle against the oppressive plantation system. z In 1916, Muslim League and Congress signed z He launched a nationwide Satyagraha against the Lucknow Pact.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronological Table
    Chronological Table Indian mutiny and widespread re­ bellion in Northern India. East India Company's rule in India replaced by the British Crown. Dayanand (1824-83) founds the Arya Samaj at Bombay. Syed Ahmad Khan (1817-98) founds MuhammadanAnglo-Oriental Col­ lege at Aligarh. Queen Victoria proclaimed Empress of India. Indian National Congress inaugur­ ated in Bombay. Hindu rmsslOnary Vivekananda (1862-1902) addresses the First World Parliament of Religions at Chicago. M. K. Gandhi (I 86g-1948) starts his career in South Afiica. The Viceroyalty of Lord Curzon. Partition of Bengal. The rise of anti­ partition movement in Bengal. The rise of Extremist Party in Congress under B. G. Tilak (1856-1920). 1906 1 October Muslim deputation led by Aga Khan (1875-1958) presents address to Viceroy Minto (1905-10). 30 December Inauguration of the All-India Muslim League at Dacca. Split in Congress at Surat. Beginning of terrorist movement in India. The Extremists excluded from Con­ gress. 218 OHRONOLOGIOAL TABLE 1909 May Morley-Minto Reforms (The Indian Council Act) grant Muslim demand for separate electorate. 1910 Birth of Hindu Mahasabha. 1911 Visit of King George V and Queen Mary and the Delhi Durbar. Partition of Bengal annulled. Transfer of Indian Capital from Calcutta to Delhi announced. Italy and Turkey at war in Tripoli. Growth of anti-British feeling among Indian Muslims. 1912 Turkey gets involved in the first Balkan war. 1913 Rabindranath Tagore (1861-1941) awarded Nobel Prize for his Gitanjali. 1913 Balkan War concluded by the Treaty of London. 1914 4 August The First World War breaks out.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit Iii the Government of India Act, 1935
    UNIT III THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ACT, 1935. Background: As the growing demands of populace led by Indian leader for constitutional reforms in India intensified with progression in the British Rule, the evolving administrative arrangements put in place by the British paved the way for a more responsible government in India premised on the fact of maximum representation of Indians. India’s support to Britain in the First World War also aided in British acknowledgement of the need for the inclusion of more Indians in the administration of their own country. This formed the basis of the passing of the Government of India Act, 1935 by the British Parliament. This legislation was the longest Act passed by the British Parliament after its domination and overtaking of administrative control in India. The Act originally passed, being very lengthy, was divided into two separate acts namely, the Government of India Act, 1935 and the Government of Burma Act, 1935. The Act was based on the facts and considerations of several experiences and outcomes which, inter alia, include the Simon Commission Report, the recommendations of the Round Table Conferences, the White Paper published by the British government in 1933 (based on the Third Round Table Conference) and the Report of the Joint Select Committees. The introduction of the Diarchy system, introduced by the Government of India Act, 1919, also did not prove to be a satisfactory experiment by the British Parliament. I. Brief Highlights of the events and causes leading to the enactment of the Government of India Act, 1935: a. Simon Commission Report: The Simon Commission was a group of seven members of the British Parliament who were sent to India in 1928 to study constitutional reforms and to make recommendations to the government.
    [Show full text]
  • Simon Commission Notes
    Simon Commission UPSC Exams are conducted to recruit efficient administrators and civil servants in the country. It is considered one of the toughest exams in India which are taken by candidates willing to serve the nation. Modern History is one of the major topics covered in these exams. One of the quintessential concepts in History is the Simon Commission which can help you answer most of the history questions for UPSC & SSC Exams. Through this blog, we are going to list NCERT notes and important points related to the Simon Commission. About Simon Commission The Indian Statutory Commission, also known as Simon Commission, was a group of 7 Members of Parliament under the chairmanship of Sir John Simon (later, 1st Viscount Simon). The commission arrived in British India in 1928 to study constitutional reform in Britain’s largest and most important possession. After its Chairman’s name Sir John Simon, Simon Commission was named. It was under the leadership of Sir John Simon, an English-based group was visiting India. These Simon Commission delegates created ripple effects on the ground, strong reactions were witnessed from noted politicians like Jawaharlal Nehru, Gandhi, Jinnah, the Muslim League, and Indian National Congress. They were not taken into confidence while formulating the report. John Simon Courtesy: National Portrait Gallery Key Highlights of the Simon Commission (Background) Now that you have a clear understanding of the Simon Commission, let’s take a look at the main highlights which are basically its expansion: ● It was under the Government of India act 1919, Diarchy was introduced. The Diarchy was made to appoint a working commission after 10 years who could review the overall progress and work from the measures the act prescribed.
    [Show full text]
  • B.A DEGREE HISTORY SEMESTER -V Core-X HY1545 MAKING of INDIAN NATION
    B.A DEGREE HISTORY SEMESTER -V Core-X HY1545 MAKING OF INDIAN NATION Causative factors for the rise of Indian nationalism • The Influence of Political Unity Brought about by the British Rule • The Impact of Western Education and Western Literature • Effect of the Socio-religious Movements • Influence of Historical Researches • British Imperialism and Economic Distress • Role of Indian Press and Literature • Racial Arrogance and Oppression • Reactionary Policies of the British • External factors like the unification movements in Germany and Italy and American civil war. Theories on the foundation of Indian National Congress Safety Valve theory says that INC was founded by A.O Hume. with the official direction of Lord Dufferin as a safety valve for the rising discontent of Indian people. W.C Banerjee argued that the Congress was really the work of Dufferin, the Viceroy of India. According to Lajpat Rai” Indian national Congress was the product of Dufferin and it was started for saving the British empire. Sundararaman says that the idea of Hume was to found the organization in England but Dufferin suggested to found in India. Nand Lal Chaterjee opined that it was the product of Russo- Phobia of the British who feared a Russian attack in India. Reghunath Rao and N.N Sen says it as the successor of theosophical society. Moderate phase of Indian National Congress • The history of the Congress in the first 20 years from 1885 to 1905 was the history of the moderates. They had faith in the British sense of justice and fairplay. Loyalty to the British crown was the keynote of their policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Iasbaba's 60 DAY PLAN 2021 HISTORY
    IASbaba’s 60 DAY PLAN 2021 UPSC HISTORY [DAY 15] 2021 Q.1) Consider the following events that happened during the reign of Viceroy Lord Curzon 1. Capital shifted from Calcutta to Delhi 2. Establishment of Archaeological survey of India. 3. Established Agriculture Research Institute at Pusa. 4. Appointment of Raleigh Commission. Which of the above statements are correct? a) 1 and 2 only b) 1, 2 and 4 only c) 2, 3 and 4 only d) 1, 2, 3 and 4 Q.1) Solution (c) Explanation: Lord Curzon, India’s Viceroy between 1899 and 1905, was one of the most controversial and consequential holders of that post. The partition of the undivided Bengal Presidency in 1905 was one of Curzon’s most criticised moves. Following events occurred during his reign. Administration 1. Announced Partition of Bengal Province, the nerve centre of Indian Nationalism into two parts - Bengal and East Bengal (1905) 2. Established Archaeological Survey of India to restore India's cultural heritage, Department of Commerce and Industry, Agricultural banks 3. Passed the Cooperative Credit Societies Act 1904. 4. Ancient Monuments Act, 1904 which made it obligatory on the part of the government and local authorities to preserve the monuments. Police 1. Appointment of Police Commission (1902) under Sir Andrew Frazer to review Police Administration, recommended the establishment of CID. 2. In 1904, the Indian Official Secrets Act passed restricting the freedom of the Press. Education 1. Emphasis on Technical Education, established Agriculture Research Institute at Pusa. www.iasbaba.com Contact: 91691 91888 Page 1 IASbaba’s 60 DAY PLAN 2021 UPSC HISTORY [DAY 15] 2021 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Report of the Simon Commission
    R,p,inted from a, AsrATIC Ravt&W, Octobl'f, 19JO. THE REPORT OF THE SIMON COMMISSION BY THE RIGHT HoN. V. S. SRINIVASA SASTRI- C.H. ' . THE REPORT OF THE' SIMON COMMISSION BY T~E RIGHT HoN. V. S. SRINIVA~A SASTRI, c~H. · A HEATED debate has arisen over the place. to· be given to the Report and recommendations. of the Simon Commission at the forthcoming Round Table Conference. One side would give it no particular importance. The other would assign to it the leading position among .the materials to be laid before the Conference and demands that its recom­ mendations should form the basis· of discussi~n ..· Certairi far-reaching consequences of these re~oiilmendations must be set forth fully and. their relation examined to the declaration made by the Viceroy i~ November.last with the. sanction of His Majesty's Government and since:reaffirmed by him on the gth of this month before the Ce~tral Legisla~ ture of India. · · · · . · · · · Let us first look at the declaration : But in view of the doubts which have been expres~d both in Great Britain and India regarding the interpretation to be placed on the inten: tions of the British Govemment in enacting the statute of 1919·, I ·am authorized on behalf of His Majesty's Government to state clearly that in their judgment it is implicit in the declaration of 1917 that the natural issue of India's constitutional progre~s, as .there contemplated, is the attainment of Dominion Status. · · To show how deeply ~e present Government stand com­ mitted to this declaration, a passage from the speech of the Secretary of State for India and one from that of the Prime Minister may be quoted, both made on the occasion when Parliament debated the subject.
    [Show full text]
  • The Indian Struggle 1920-34
    The Indian Struggle 1920-34 Subhas Chandra Bose www.subhaschandrabose.org January 2012 This book, first published in London in 1935, could be published in India only in 1948 since it was banned by the British Government. Mission Netaji is publishing this electronic version to facilitate a wider reach. The Indian Struggle Villeneuve (Vaud),Villa Olga, February 22,1935. Dear Mr. Subhas C. Bose, I duly received your volume “The Indian Struggle 1920-34”, which you were good enough to send me. I thank you for it and congratulate on it heartily. So interesting seemed the book to us that I ordered another copy so that my wife and sister should have one each. It is an indispensable work for the history of the Indian Movement. In it you show the best qualities of the historian: lucidity and high equity of mind. Rarely it happens that a man of action as you are is apt to judge without party spirit. …We, the men of thought, must each of us fight against the temptation, that befalls us in moments of fatigue and unsettledness, of repairing to a world beyond the battle called either God, or Art, or independence of Spirit, or those distant regions of the mystic soul. But fight we must, our duty lies on this side of the ocean, on the battle-ground of men… I sincerely wish that your health will speedily recover for the good of India that is in need of you and I beg you to believe in my cordial sympathy. Romain Rolland ii www.subhaschandrabose.org The Indian Struggle PREFACE Many are the defects that will be found in this book.
    [Show full text]