DOCSLIB.ORG

The Selected Synchronistic Kings of Assyria and Babylonia in the Lacunae of A.117

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Selected Synchronistic Kings of Assyria and Babylonia in the Lacunae of A.117 Appendix III The Selected Synchronistic Kings of Assyria and Babylonia in the Lacunae of A.117 1 Shamshi-Adad I / Ishme-Dagan I vs. Hammurabi The synchronization of Hammurabi and the ruling family of Shamshi-Adad I’s kingdom can be proven by the correspondence between them, including the letters of Yasmah-Addu, the ruler of Mari and younger son of Shamshi-Adad I, to Hammurabi as well as an official named Hulalum in Babylon1 and those of Ishme-Dagan I to Hammurabi.2 Landsberger proposed that Shamshi-Adad I might still have been alive during the first ten years of Hammurabi’s reign and that the first year of Ishme- Dagan I would have been the 11th year of Hammurabi’s reign.3 However, it was also suggested that Shamshi-Adad I would have died in the 12th / 13th4 or 17th / 18th5 year of Hammurabi’s reign and Ishme-Dagan I in the 28th or 31st year.6 If so, the reign length of Ishme-Dagan I recorded in the AKL might be unreliable and he would have ruled as the successor of Shamshi-Adad I only for about 11 years.7 1 van Koppen, MARI 8 (1997), 418–421; Durand, DÉPM, No. 916. 2 Charpin, ARM 26/2 (1988), No. 384. 3 Landsberger, JCS 8/1 (1954), 39, n. 44. 4 Whiting, OBOSA 6, 210, n. 205. 5 Veenhof, AP, 35; van de Mieroop, KHB, 9; Eder, AoF 31 (2004), 213; Gasche et al., MHEM 4, 52; Gasche et al., Akkadica 108 (1998), 1–2; Charpin and Durand, MARI 4 (1985), 293–343. Since the Assyrian calendar year begins in spring, while the Babylonian calendar year begins in autumn, the year of Shamshi-Adad I’s death was later restored by Charpin and Ziegler to be the 18th year of Hammurabi’s reign. See Charpin and Ziegler, FM 5, 160–161; see also Pruzsinszky, MCh, 163. 6 According to the Mari Letters, Ishme-Dagan I might have had to withdraw from Ekallatu and take sanctuary at Babylon in the 28th year of Hammurabi. See Gasche et al., MHEM 4, 52. Since Ishme-Dagan I disappeared from the sources after the 30th year of Hammurabi, Veenhof suggested that his last year would have been the 31st year of Hammurabi’s reign. See Veenhof, MARI 4 (1985), 213. 7 Gasche et al., MHEM 4, 52–53. Landsberger proposed that Ishme-Dagan I might have ruled the first half of his reign as the ruler at Ekallatu (before the death of Shamshi-Adad I) and then the second half of his reign as king of Assyria at Ashur (after the death of Shamshi-Adad I). See Landsberger, JCS 8/1 (1954), 36–37. For the invalidity of the reign length of Ishme-Dagan I in the AKL see also Veenhof, MARI 4 (1985), 212; CA, 68. © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2020 | doi:10.1163/9789004430921_010 Fei Chen - 9789004430921 Downloaded from Brill.com09/29/2021 07:59:49PM via free access 208 Appendix III 2 Ashur-uballit I vs. the Kassite Kings from Burnaburiash II to Kurigalzu II Ashur-uballit I must have been contemporary with several Babylonian kings. His first Babylonian counterpart must have been Burnaburiash II, because both of them were in correspondence with the Egyptian pharaoh Amenhotep IV.8 Moreover, Ashur- uballit I married his daughter Muballitat-Sherua to a Kassite king. Muballitat-Sherua gave birth to a son, who later became the Babylonian king but was soon overthrown by a native Kassite. Ashur-uballit I marched to Babylonia and expelled the usurper and then installed a new Babylonian king. This event, which must have happened towards the end of the Amarna Period,9 was recorded by the Synchronistic History and Chronicle P,10 but the narratives of the two sources are inconsistent: 1) The son of Muballitat-Sherua is first called Karahardash but then Karaindash in the Synchronistic History, but Kadashman- Harbe, son of Karaindash, son of Muballitat-Sherua, according to Chronicle P; 2) The usurper is called Nazibugash in the Synchronistic History, but Shuzigash in Chronicle P; 3) The new Babylonian king installed by Ashur-uballit I is Kurigalzu, the younger, son of Burnaburiash, according to the Synchronistic History, but Kurigalzu, son of Kadashman-Harbe, according to Chronicle P. However, neither of both sources records explicitly who the husband of Muballitat-Sherua was. The difference between the names of the usurper might be due to diverse phonetic readings. According to Peise and Röllig, the authentic name should be Nazibugash.11 The two sources both record that the Babylonian king installed by Ashur-uballit I is called Kurigalzu, who must be Kurigalzu II.12 According to Brinkman, there could only have been two Kassite kings named Kurigalzu.13 Kurigalzu in the Synchronistic History is clearly called “the younger, son of Burnaburiash”, which would imply that there had been a previous king with the same name. Moreover, Burnaburiash II also mentioned one of his ancestors named Kurigalzu,14 who must be Kurigalzu I. Of the two “Kurigalzu”: one was the son of Kadashman-Harbe, and the other was the son of Burnaburiash;15 one ruled before Burnaburiash II and the other ruled after 8 Moran, AL, EA 7–11, 15–16. For the time of Burnaburiash II’s reign see Boese, UF 14 (1982), 15–26. 9 Brinkman, MSKH, 421. 10 Grayson, ABC, 159–160, 171–172. 11 Peise, OLZ 11 (1908), 8; Röllig, HSAO, 175, n. 3. 12 Grayson, ABC, 212. 13 Brinkman, Or 38 (1969), 320–327; RLA 6 (1980–1983), 369–370. For the earlier proposition of “Kurigalzu III”, see Peise, OLZ 11 (1908), 9; Ungnad, AfK 1 (1923), 21. 14 Moran, AL, EA 11; Maidman, Kaskal 8 (2011), 112–113; Mladjov, NABU 2016/3, 109–110. 15 Brinkman, MSKH, 205. Fei Chen - 9789004430921 Downloaded from Brill.com09/29/2021 07:59:49PM via free access The Selected Synchronistic Kings of Assyria and Babylonia 209 Burnaburiash II. Thus based upon the Synchronistic History, Kurigalzu II must be the son of Burnaburiash II; while in accordance with Chronicle P, Kurigalzu II is the son of a Kadashman-Harbe. Furthermore, the identifications for the son and the hus- band of Muballitat-Sherua remain irreconcilable between the two sources. By the Synchronistic History, the son of Muballitat-Sherua is Karahardash or Karaindash, but his father (i.e. the husband of Muballitat-Sherua) is never mentioned. As for the discrepancy between Karahardash and Karaindash, Röllig argued that the authentic name should be Karakindash (i.e. “Ka-ra-ḪAR-da-áš” should be read as “Ka-ra-kín- da-áš”), and Karaindash must be a scribal error.16 On the other hand, the records in Chronicle P are ambiguous, depending on how we interpret the phrase “[mKa-dáš- man-Ḫa]rbe mār mKara-in-da-áš māru šá SALMu-bal-liṭ-at-dṢēru-u-a”;17 that is, it could be “Kadashman-Harbe, son of Karaindash, (who was) son of Muballitat-Sherua”,18 or “Kadashman-Harbe, son of Karaindash (and) son of Muballitat-Sherua”.19 Because of the lacuna in the BKLa and the ScKL (A.117), it cannot be determined directly which of the two sources is right or which is wrong. Some scholars give preference to the Synchronistic History. Jaritz supposed that the scribe of Chronicle P might have mistaken Kurigalzu II as Kurigalzu I.20 Chronicle P was rejected by Röllig, who adduced certain other pieces of information from that document to prove it untrustworthy.21 Equally, Brinkman thought that it was unrea- sonable to insert a Kadashman-Harbe or a Karaindash between Burnaburiash II and Kurigalzu II and the “non-existent extra rulers” would have misled us on the modern reconstructions.22 If the evidence from the Synchronistic History can be accepted, the Kassite royal sequence for this period will be: Karahardash (probably the son of Burnaburiash II23) – Nazibugash – Kurigalzu II (the son of Burnaburiash II). On the contrary, many scholars believe that Chronicle P is more reliable:24 1) Chronicle P is right that Kurigalzu II was the son of Kadashman-Harbe, who was the son of Muballitat-Sherua,25 while the scribe of the Synchronistic History might have 16 Röllig, HSAO, 176–177; von Soden, PW, 61; Paulus, IRW 1, 70, n. 58; Miller, KBUK 1, 104, n. 24. 17 Grayson, ABC, 171. 18 Röllig, HSAO, 175. 19 Peise, OLZ 11 (1908), 8; Brinkman, MSKH, 419; Glassner, MC, 279. 20 Jaritz, MIO 6 (1958), 215. 21 Röllig, HSAO, 173–184. 22 Brinkman, MSKH, 418–423; van Seters, SH, 86–87; Maidman, Kaskal 8 (2011), 111. 23 Röllig, HSAO, 178; Melville, ACANE, 225. 24 According to Grayson, the Synchronistic History is replete with all kinds of errors and its author showed a more favourable light on Assyria, while Chronicle P contained no signifi- cant errors and its author was far more objective. See Grayson, ABC, 58, n. 69. 25 Luckenbill, AJSL 23/4 (1907), 281; Radau, BE 17/1, 63–67; Furlong, AANEC, 55; Sassmannshausen, MDAR, 61, n. 3; see also Bloch, JAC 25 (2010), 71, n. 42. Fei Chen - 9789004430921 Downloaded from Brill.com09/29/2021 07:59:49PM via free access 210 Appendix III been mistaken in calling Kurgalzu II the son of Burnaburiash II,26 or Kurigalzu II is merely a descendant of Burnaburiash II in the Synchronistic History;27 2) the Karahardash in the Synchronistic History must be identical with Kadashman-Harbe, the son of Muballitat-Sherua;28 3) the father of Kadashman-Harbe and the husband of Muballitat-Sherua would be Karaindash29 (more precisely Karaindash II,30 since one Karaindash was mentioned by Burnaburiash II in a letter to Amenhotep IV31).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ancient Near Eastern Studies
    Ancient Near Eastern Studies Studies in Ancient Persia Receptions of the Ancient Near East and the Achaemenid Period in Popular Culture and Beyond edited by John Curtis edited by Lorenzo Verderame An important collection of eight essays on and Agnès Garcia-Ventura Ancient Persia (Iran) in the periods of the This book is an enthusiastic celebration Achaemenid Empire (539–330 BC), when of the ways in which popular culture has the Persians established control over the consumed aspects of the ancient Near East whole of the Ancient Near East, and later the to construct new realities. It reflects on how Sasanian Empire: stone relief carvings from objects, ideas, and interpretations of the Persepolis; the Achaemenid period in Baby- ancient Near East have been remembered, lon; neglected aspects of biblical archaeol- constructed, re-imagined, mythologized, or ogy and the books of Daniel and Isaiah; and the Sasanian period in Iran (AD indeed forgotten within our shared cultural memories. 250–650) when Zoroastrianism became the state religion. 332p, illus (Lockwood Press, March 2020) paperback, 9781948488242, $32.95. 232p (James Clarke & Co., January 2020) paperback, 9780227177068, $38.00. Special Offer $27.00; PDF e-book, 9781948488259, $27.00 Special Offer $31.00; hardcover, 9780227177051, $98.00. Special Offer $79.00 PDF e-book, 9780227907061, $31.00; EPUB e-book, 9780227907078, $30.99 Women at the Dawn of History The Synagogue in Ancient Palestine edited by Agnete W. Lassen Current Issues and Emerging Trends and Klaus Wagensonner edited by Rick Bonnie, Raimo Hakola and Ulla Tervahauta In the patriarchal world of ancient This book brings together leading experts in the field of ancient-synagogue Mesopotamia, women were often studies to discuss the current issues and emerging trends in the study of represented in their relation to men.
    [Show full text]
  • The Selected Synchronistic Kings of Assyria and Babylonia in the Lacunae of A.117
    Appendix III The Selected Synchronistic Kings of Assyria and Babylonia in the Lacunae of A.117 1 Shamshi-Adad I / Ishme-Dagan I vs. Hammurabi The synchronization of Hammurabi and the ruling family of Shamshi-Adad I’s kingdom can be proven by the correspondence between them, including the letters of Yasmah-Addu, the ruler of Mari and younger son of Shamshi-Adad I, to Hammurabi as well as an official named Hulalum in Babylon1 and those of Ishme-Dagan I to Hammurabi.2 Landsberger proposed that Shamshi-Adad I might still have been alive during the first ten years of Hammurabi’s reign and that the first year of Ishme- Dagan I would have been the 11th year of Hammurabi’s reign.3 However, it was also suggested that Shamshi-Adad I would have died in the 12th / 13th4 or 17th / 18th5 year of Hammurabi’s reign and Ishme-Dagan I in the 28th or 31st year.6 If so, the reign length of Ishme-Dagan I recorded in the AKL might be unreliable and he would have ruled as the successor of Shamshi-Adad I only for about 11 years.7 1 van Koppen, MARI 8 (1997), 418–421; Durand, DÉPM, No. 916. 2 Charpin, ARM 26/2 (1988), No. 384. 3 Landsberger, JCS 8/1 (1954), 39, n. 44. 4 Whiting, OBOSA 6, 210, n. 205. 5 Veenhof, AP, 35; van de Mieroop, KHB, 9; Eder, AoF 31 (2004), 213; Gasche et al., MHEM 4, 52; Gasche et al., Akkadica 108 (1998), 1–2; Charpin and Durand, MARI 4 (1985), 293–343.
    [Show full text]
  • Karduniaš. Babylonia Under the Kassites
    Karduniaš. Babylonia Under the Kassites The Proceedings of the Symposium Held in Munich 30 June to 2 July 2011 Tagungsbericht des Münchner Symposiums 30. Juni bis 2. Juli 2011 edited by Alexa Bartelmus and Katja Sternitzke Volume 1 Philological and Historical Studies Bereitgestellt von | Universitaetsbibliothek der LMU München Angemeldet | [email protected] Heruntergeladen am | 16.08.17 09:30 ISBN 978-1-5015-1163-9 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-1-5015-0356-6 e-ISBN (ePub) 978-1-5015-0348-1 ISSN 0502-7012 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2017 Walter de Gruyter Inc., Boston/Berlin Typesetting: fidus Publikations-Service GmbH, Nördlingen Printing and binding: Druckerei Hubert & Co. GmbH und Co. KG ♾ Printed on acid-free paper Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com Bereitgestellt von | Universitaetsbibliothek der LMU München Angemeldet | [email protected] Heruntergeladen am | 16.08.17 09:30 Jared L. Miller 3 Political Interactions between Kassite Babylonia and Assyria, Egypt and Ḫatti during the Amarna Age Introduction This paper aims first to provide a concise overview of the political interactions between Kassite Babylonia and the other Great Powers of the Amarna Age, i.e. Egypt, Ḫatti, Mittani and Assyria, a subject which could naturally fill a sizable monograph, or rather, a series of monographs. In an attempt to justify yet another general introduction to the era,1 this paper will also discuss two items to which some minor novel contribution can be made.
    [Show full text]
  • ISSN 0989-5671 N°3 (Septembre) NOTES BRÈVES
    ISSN 0989-5671 2016 N°3 (septembre) NOTES BRÈVES 55) Ergänzungen zu CUSAS 17, Nr. 104 — Auf dem „ancient kudurru“ CUSAS 17, Nr. 104 hat der Autor in NABU 2014 Nr. 38 den Namen PI.PI.EN als en-be6-be6 gelesen. Einer plausiblen Vermutung von Piotr Steinkeller (CUSAS 17, 217-18) zufolge handelt es sich bei dem Namensträger um einen König von Umma. Er wäre damit wahrscheinlich der erste Herrscher in Mesopotamien, der durch eine Inschrift aus seiner Regierungszeit belegt ist. Mit diesem Namen lässt sich auch nin-be6-be6 Banca Adab 13 Vs. i 3 (ED IIIb) vergleichen. Der Wechsel en : nin stützt die sumerische Interpretation des Namens und die Lesung be6 gegen die nur in semitischem Kontext gebrauchte Lesung wu. Gegen eine semitische Interpretation spricht auch be6-be6 UET II 171 B; 296, da die Wahrscheinlichkeit für einen semitischen Namen in diesen Texten unter einem Prozent liegt1) und der Name auch bei etwas anderer Lesung kein Merkmal hat, das ihn als typisch semitisch ausweisen würde. Eventuell zu vergleichen ist auch be6-be6-mud SF 63 iv 6 (P010654). Wenn so richtig gedeutet, handelt es sich um einen alten sumerischen Namen.²) Es gibt allerdings später einen ähnlichen semitischen oder semitisierten Namen bí-bí-um, z. B. IAS 531 ii 6. ki ki Der älteste Beleg für wu ist wohl à-wu-ur4 IAS 104 (Mitte) = Ebla à-wu-ur , cf. CUSAS 12, S. 197, 215. Diese Schreibung aus einer geographischen Liste in Tell Abū Ṣalābīḫ belegt die Lesung natürlich nicht für das Sumerische oder auch nur für den Süden, wo auch in semitischen Namen wa und wu nicht belegt sind, was im ersteren Fall nicht als Zufall gewertet werden kann (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/29/2021 06:11:41PM Via Free Access 208 Appendix III
    Appendix III The Selected Synchronistic Kings of Assyria and Babylonia in the Lacunae of A.117 1 Shamshi-Adad I / Ishme-Dagan I vs. Hammurabi The synchronization of Hammurabi and the ruling family of Shamshi-Adad I’s kingdom can be proven by the correspondence between them, including the letters of Yasmah-Addu, the ruler of Mari and younger son of Shamshi-Adad I, to Hammurabi as well as an official named Hulalum in Babylon1 and those of Ishme-Dagan I to Hammurabi.2 Landsberger proposed that Shamshi-Adad I might still have been alive during the first ten years of Hammurabi’s reign and that the first year of Ishme- Dagan I would have been the 11th year of Hammurabi’s reign.3 However, it was also suggested that Shamshi-Adad I would have died in the 12th / 13th4 or 17th / 18th5 year of Hammurabi’s reign and Ishme-Dagan I in the 28th or 31st year.6 If so, the reign length of Ishme-Dagan I recorded in the AKL might be unreliable and he would have ruled as the successor of Shamshi-Adad I only for about 11 years.7 1 van Koppen, MARI 8 (1997), 418–421; Durand, DÉPM, No. 916. 2 Charpin, ARM 26/2 (1988), No. 384. 3 Landsberger, JCS 8/1 (1954), 39, n. 44. 4 Whiting, OBOSA 6, 210, n. 205. 5 Veenhof, AP, 35; van de Mieroop, KHB, 9; Eder, AoF 31 (2004), 213; Gasche et al., MHEM 4, 52; Gasche et al., Akkadica 108 (1998), 1–2; Charpin and Durand, MARI 4 (1985), 293–343.
    [Show full text]
  • N°1 (Mars) NOTES BRÈVES
    ISSN 0989-5671 2016 N°1 (mars) NOTES BRÈVES 1) On two Ebla lexical lists with personal names (MEE 3 67, 59) — [1] TM.75.G.1565 = MEE 3 67 – This small rounded tablet, published among the “esercizi scolastici” in PETTINATO 1981:261, is a “word list with personal names” for ARCHI 1992:14 (and see also CIVIL 1984:81 n. 10). For Pettinato “il testo si compone di due parti nettamente distinte tra loro: la prima parte (recto) contiene un elenco di parole sumeriche ordinate acrograficamente in base all’elemento iniziale nì-; la seconda invece (verso) abbraccia una serie di nomi di persona che contengono tutti l’elemento lugal- in prima posizione. Mentre la serie che inizia con nì- ricorda da vicino l’omonima serie dei testi lessical šè-bar-unken, la seconda va rapportata al testo [MEE 3] n. 59 r. II:1-7”. However, the comparison with TM.75.G.2014 = MEE 3 59 (see below) suggests that also in TM.75.G.1565 = MEE 3 67 the six personal names were instead written before the seven common nouns of the acrographic section ninda (and note not only “r.?” and “v.?” in the edition in PETTINATO 1981:261, but also the inversion of the obverse and the reverse in the photographs of the tablet in MEE 3, Tav. XXXVIIa-b). I read the lexical list TM.75.G.1565 = MEE 3 67 as follows: (PN1) obv.I:1 Lugal-˹á˺-máḫ (PN2) obv.I:2 Lugal-ur-sag mušen (PN3) obv.I:3 Lugal-ánzud(AN.MI) ? (PN4) obv.II:1 [Luga]l-˹da-zi ˺ (PN5) obv.II:2 Lugal-gal-bí-DU ? (PN6) obv.II:3 Lugal-(x -)šùd-šè (1) rev.I:1 GAR-X (2) rev.I:2 kadra(GAR.ŠÀ!.A) (3) rev.I:3 níg-šu!-luḫ (4) rev.I:4 ninda-sag?(-x?) (5) rev.II:1 níg-ki-za (6) rev.II:2 ninda-géme (7) rev.II:3 níg-mul – 1 – N.A.B.U 2016/1 (mars) [2] TM.75.G.2014 = MEE 3 59 – This tablet with rounded corners, six columns on the obverse and only three columns on the reverse, has been published among the “liste di nomi di persona sumerico- eblaiti e parole sumeriche” in PETTINATO 1981:243-245 (photograph in Tav.
    [Show full text]
  • Assyrian Collective Identity in the Second Millennium BCE: a Social Categories Approach
    Assyrian Collective Identity in the Second Millennium BCE: A Social Categories Approach By Jonathan Valk A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Institute for the Study of the Ancient World New York University May, 2018 ___________________________ Professor Beate Pongratz-Leisten © Jonathan Valk All Rights Reserved, 2018 Dedication To the two most important women in my life: my mother Tamara, and my wife Avichag. In thinking of either of them I can do no less than echo the praise of the goddess Nanaya: ela šâša, mannu mīna eppuš? Without her, who can do anything? - SAA III, 4: r ii 9' iii Acknowledgements This project represents not the culmination of a long journey, but an important waystation on the road. The path has been muddy and riddled with potholes. It has, on occasion, been lost altogether, only to reappear in an unexpected place, meandering in an here I am! – with my offering in hand. I first set out – הנני ,unanticipated direction. Nevertheless on this journey many rotations around the sun ago. When I left the safety of the maternal nest, I had only just begun to realize that I do not know much. Now, I am acutely aware of it. All to the better. My awareness of my own ignorance has been helped along by many people whom I have been fortunate to know and to learn from. Before moving to New York and deciding to pursue research in the ancient world, I had the opportunity to work closely with Martin Goodman and Bernard Wasserstein at the universities of Oxford and Chicago respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesopotamian Political History Into Distinct Halves. Thus the Old Baby
    FOR FURTHER READING 109 Mesopotamian political history into distinct halves. Thus the Old Baby- lonian world is deeply rooted in the third millennium, while Kassite culture is more akin to the first. Potts, Daniel T. Mesopotamian Civilization: The Material Foundations. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1997. A useful collection of stand-alone essays covering features of Mesopotamian civilization often overlooked in other studies. Gives much attention to the written cuneiform sources while also updating and interacting with the perti- nent secondary literature. Roaf, Michael. Cultural Atlas of Mesopotamia and the Ancient Near East. New York: Facts on File, 1996. The best available atlas on ancient Mesopotamia. Also includes much discussion and treatment of relevant background information. Roux, Georges. Ancient Iraq. 3rd ed. London: Penguin, 1992. Written by a French medical doctor who subsequently became a scholar of ancient Mesopotamia in his own right and published articles in technical jour- nals. A comprehensive survey with an astounding sweep from Paleolithic times to the Sassanians (224–651 C.E.), this book is engag- ingly written and lucid. Its usefulness is still evident in its third edition since its original publication in 1964. Saggs, H. W. F. The Greatness That Was Babylon: A Survey of the Ancient Civilization of the Tigris-Euphrates Valley. 2nd ed. London: Sidgwick & Jackson, 1988. Originally published in 1962, this authoritative and comprehensive treatment covers Babylonian society, law and adminis- tration, trade and economics, religion, literature, and science, as well as providing an overview of political history. Abbreviated and more up-to-date treatment may be found in the author’s Babylonians (Berke- ley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • The Babylonian Chronicles
    The Babylonian chronicles The chronicles from Babylon and Borsippa in a comparative perspective Mariëtte Wessels s1023039 Master thesis Assyriology @1 Table of contents Page Abbreviations 3 Periods 4 Introduction and method 5-9 Introducing the corpus 10-12 Periods and dynasties in the chronicles 13-16 Subjects in the chronicles 17-25 Places in the chronicles 26-32 Kings in the chronicles 33-40 Timespan of the chronicles 41-43 Reoccurring sentences in the chronicles 44-46 Gods and religion in the chronicles 47-50 Appearance of the chronicles 51-54 Conclusion 55-56 Bibliography 57-62 @2 Abbreviations ADRT I Hunger, H. and Sachs A.J. (1988). Astronomical Diaries and Related Texts from Babylonia, volume I. Vienna. BM British Museum Glassner, MC Glassner, J. (2004). Mesopotamian Chronicles. Atlanta. Grayson, ABC Grayson, A.K. (1975). Assyrian and Babylonian Chronicles. New York. Van der Spek, BCHP Van der Spek, R.J. (2004). Babylonian Chronicles from the Hellenistic Period. http://www.livius.org/babylonia.html. @3 Periods1 Akkad Dynasty 2334-2154 Third Dynasty of Ur 2112-2004 Larsa Dynasty 2025-1763 First Dynasty of Isin 2017-1794 Old Assyrian Period ca. 1900-1750 First Dynasty of Babylon 1894-1595 First Dynasty of the Sealand unknown Middle Assyrian Period ca. 1300-1100 Kassite Dynasty 1374?-1155 Second Dynasty of Isin 1157-1026 Second Sealand Dynasty 1025-1005 Bazi Dynasty 1004-985 Elamite Dynasty 984-979 Uncertain Dynasties 978-748 Neo-Assyrian Dynasty 744-612 Neo-Babylonian Dynasty 626-539 Persian Empire 538-331 Macedonian Rulers 330-307 Seleucid Dynasty 305-65 BCE Arsacid Dynasty 250 BCE-228 CE 1 Information retrieved from: Oppenheim 1964: 335-347; Van de Mieroop 2007: 302-317.
    [Show full text]
  • An Alternate Chronology for the Near East During the Late Bronze and Early Iron Ages, and Its Consequences Fo
    Aspects of Ancient Near Eastern Chronology (c. 1600 – 700 BC) Pierce James Furlong Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy February 2007 Centre for Classics and Archaeology The University of Melbourne © Pierce J Furlong, 2007 Abstract There can be no more important topic in historical studies than chronology, for it is chronology which gives meaning to history by placing individuals, events and material remains within their true sequence. If this sequence does not match historical actuality, then, the historical narrative drawn from the available evidence may appear confused, incomplete or even contradictory. The history of the Near East is bound together by an accurate and continuous absolute chronology which stretches back to the early first millennium BC. However, beyond that point in time we are forced to rely upon relative chronologies for the histories of the Great Kingdoms of Egypt, Babylonia, Assyria and Hatti, amongst others. Scholars have pieced together these relative chronologies over the last one-two centuries using information from King-lists, royal annals and administrative documents. The end result of this major enterprise is, today, what can best be described as an extremely complex but little understood jigsaw puzzle composed of a multiplicity of loosely connected data. Moreover, many of the pieces of this puzzle are missing. For example, while the relative chronology of the Egyptian New Kingdom (18th-20th Dynasties) is fairly well established, it is separated from the absolute chronology of the 7th century BC Saite Dynasty by the chronologically indeterminate and confused Third Intermediate Period (21st-25th Dynasties).
    [Show full text]
  • Babylonian Encounters in the Upper Diyala River Valley
    Babylonian Encounters in the Upper Diyala River Valley: Contextualizing the Results of Regional Survey and the 2016–2017 Excavations at Khani Masi Author(s): Claudia Glatz, Jesse Casana, Robin Bendrey, Emma Baysal, Daniel Calderbank, Francesca Chelazzi, Francesco Del Bravo, Neil Erskine, Mette Marie Hald, Elise Jakoby Laugier, Eric Jensen and Elsa Perruchini Source: American Journal of Archaeology , Vol. 123, No. 3 (July 2019), pp. 439-471 Published by: Archaeological Institute of America Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3764/aja.123.3.0439 JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms Archaeological Institute of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to American Journal of Archaeology This content downloaded from 130.209.6.61 on Thu, 04 Jul 2019 11:33:07 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms field report Babylonian Encounters in the Upper Diyala River Valley: Contextualizing the Results of Regional Survey and the 2016–2017 Excavations at Khani Masi claudia glatz, jesse casana, robin bendrey, emma baysal, daniel calderbank, francesca chelazzi, francesco del bravo, neil erskine, mette marie hald, elise jakoby laugier, eric jensen, and elsa perruchini Kassite Babylonia counts among the great powers of the Late Bronze Age Near East.
    [Show full text]
  • BABYLONIAN CHRONOLOGY of the 2Nd HALF of the 2Nd
    061_070.qxd 13.02.2004 09:50 Seite 61 B A B Y L O N I A N C H R O N O L O G Y O F T H E 2 n d H A L F O F T H E 2 n d M I L L E N N I U M B . C . Leonhard Sassmannshausen* C O N N E C T I N G K A S S I T E C H R O N O L O G Y 15 years for K a d a š m a n - E n l I l I . Thus the accession W I T H T H E 1 s t M I L L E N N I U M of Kadašman-Enlil I has to be dated at 1374 B. C. at the latest. The most important source for the chronology of For the middle Kassite period we have a good the Kassite and Post-Kassite periods is Babyloni- sample of dated documents from Nippur for the an King List A 1 which gives the lengths of the 125 years from the first year of Burna-Buriy å š II reigns of all kings of Babylon from the first to Kaštiliy å š IV. These dates confirm the general dynasty ofBabylon to the Neo-Assyrian period. reliability ofthe Babylonian King List A at least Unfortunately we know so far only one copy of for the middle Kassite period. We only hAve minor this text which has three gaps and lacks the begin- problems, the most serious of which is the 25th ning and the end.
    [Show full text]