DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 1, Inventory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 1, Inventory Chapter 1 INVENTORY Chapter One Inventory The initial step in the preparation of the development that has taken place airport master plan for Ryan Airfield recently at the airport. (RYN) is the collection of information pertaining to the airport and the area it • Population and other significant serves. The information summarized in socioeconomic data which can provide this chapter will be used in subsequent an indication of future trends that could analyses in this study. It includes: influence aviation activity at the airport. • Physical inventories and descriptions • A review of existing local and regional of the facilities and services currently plans and studies to determine their provided at the airport, including the potential influence on the develop- regional airspace, air traffic control, ment and implementation of the and aircraft operating procedures. airport master plan. • Background information pertaining The information in this chapter was to Pima County and the Tucson obtained from several sources, includ- metropolitan area, including descrip- ing on-site inspections, interviews with tions of the regional climate, surface the Tucson Airport Authority (TAA) transportation systems, Ryan staff and airport tenants, airport Airfield's role in the regional, state, records, related studies, the Arizona and national aviation systems, and Department of Transportation (ADOT), the Federal Aviation Admini- June 11, 2010 1-1 stration (FAA), and a number of in- port Authority is a non-profit organi- ternet sites. A complete listing of the zation that was created by state char- data sources is provided at the end of ter in 1948 to promote air transporta- this chapter. tion and commerce in the state, to maintain the Tucson International Airport and Ryan Airfield facilities, AIRPORT SETTING and to encourage economic growth in Tucson and southern Arizona. The Ryan Airfield is located approximately TAA is made up of 115 community vo- ten miles southwest of the City of Tuc- lunteers and a nine-person board son at the intersection of Ajo Highway which oversees policy decisions. The (State Route 86) and West Valencia TAA also has a staff of approximately Road, as shown on Exhibit 1A. Ryan 330 employees who handle daily oper- Airfield is situated on 1,754 acres at ations at Tucson International Airport 2,417 feet above mean sea level (MSL) and Ryan Airfield. and serves as a general aviation re- liever to Tucson International Airport. Tucson International Airport as well AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT as Ryan Airfield are owned by the City HISTORY of Tucson and operated by the TAA. Ryan Airfield is one of five public-use Ryan Airfield was developed during general aviation airport facilities in World War II as the Federal govern- Pima County. ment began to realize a need for a large number of trained pilots. The Pima County encompasses approx- San Diego-based Ryan School of Aero- imately 9,189 square miles of south nautics was one of several civilian central Arizona. Tucson, the state’s flight schools contracted to train Army second largest city at 543,959 resi- fliers. With the fear of coastal attack dents, made up approximately 54 per- spurred by Pearl Harbor, inland train- cent of the total County population of ing sites were preferred, and Arizona’s 1,014,023 in 2008. Tucson is also the clear weather was ideal. county seat for Pima County. Pima County is home to the Tohono From a June 15, 1942 groundbreak- O’odham Nation Native American ing, the open desert southwest of Tuc- Reservation, as well as Saguaro Na- son was transformed into an Army air- tional Park which showcases the So- field in just three months. The Ryan noran Desert and the plants and ani- School of Aeronautics came complete mals that inhabit the desert. with paved runways, apron, hangars, barracks, mess hall, maintenance shop, classrooms, offices, a PX, and OWNERSHIP recreational facilities. A full four AND MANAGEMENT month course of flight instruction was compressed to nine weeks as Ryan Ryan Airfield is owned by the City of graduated 6,000 pilots in two years of Tucson and is operated and main- operation before the school was closed tained by the TAA. The Tucson Air- on September 5, 1944. June 11, 2010 1-2 Arizona Wickenburg 60 17 07MP02-1A-6/12/08 60 93 Cave Creek Sun City PhoenixPhoenix Glendale ScottsdSScottsdalettstsdad l 10 Claypool Avondale Mesa Buckeye Tempe 70 San Carlos Chandler 60 Superior 10 Florence Gila Bend Coolidge Casa Grande 8 Eloy Mammoth Oracle San Manuel Marana Ajo RyanRyan AirfieldAirfield 10 Benson SellsS Saint David GGreen Valley Saguaro National 19 Park-West Sierra Vista Nogales TucsonTucson 210 S Alvernon Way W Ajo Hwy Davis 86 10 Monthan AFB RRyRyanyaann AirfiAirfieAAirfieldirrfififieeleldldd 19 W Valencia Rd E VValenciaalencia RRdd Tucson Int’l Airport Exhibit 1A LOCATION MAP At the end of World War II, the United runway from 4,000 feet to 5,500 feet in States government was left with nu- 1982-83; the construction of the main- merous surplus airports which were tenance facility in 1987, the installa- transferred to state and local jurisdic- tion of a permanent airport traffic con- tions under the War Surplus Property trol tower (ATCT) in 1993; the con- Act of 1944. Ryan Airfield, including struction of a 4,900-foot-long parallel all improvements, was transferred to runway in 1993; the paving of the the state of Arizona on October 4, 4,000-foot crosswind runway in 1999; 1948. and the construction of an airport ad- ministration building in 2004. On August 1, 1951, the State executed a 10-year lease agreement with the The FAA has provided funding assis- TAA for the 906-acre airport, ending a tance to Ryan Airfield through the six-year period of dormancy. Within Airport Improvement Program (AIP). three weeks of operation, five build- The AIP is funded through the Avia- ings were leased to two tenants. The tion Trust Fund, which was estab- original agreement, however, proved lished in 1970 to provide funding for to be a barrier to development because aviation capital investment programs prospective tenants would not finance (aviation development, facilities and any improvements based upon the equipment, and research and devel- short term of the lease. In 1954, a opment). The Trust Fund also fin- new 99-year lease was executed. The ances a portion of the operation of the State ultimately transferred owner- FAA. It is funded by user fees, taxes ship of the airport by quit claim deed on airline tickets, aviation fuel, and to the City of Tucson on December 16, various aircraft parts. 1960. The lease with the TAA re- mained in effect. Table 1A summarizes FAA AIP grants received by Ryan Airfield since Since that time, Ryan Airfield has ex- 1997. The FAA has provided more perienced a significant expansion of than $5.2 million for airport improve- general aviation facilities. This has ments at Ryan Airfield over the past included the extension of the primary ten years. TABLE 1A AIP Grants Offered to TAA for Ryan Airfield Projects AIP Grant Project Total Fiscal Year Number Description Grant Funds 1997 3-04-0044-10 Land Acquisition $1,000,000 2001 3-04-0044-11 Taxiway/Apron Reconstruction $1,062,939 2002 3-04-0044-12 Taxiway B Lighting, Airfield Drainage $859,697 2003 3-04-0044-13 GA Development Area Design $150,000 GA Development Area Construction, 2004 3-04-0044-14 Emergency Generator, Update Airport $1,667,131 Wide Basin Study 2005 3-04-0044-15 Airfield Security Fencing $107,585 2007 3-04-0044-17 Ryan Tower Equipment & Cab Glass $395,879 Total Grant Funds $5,243,231 Source: TAA Records June 11, 2010 1-3 From 1994 through 2008, ADOT has Table 1B summarizes these projects invested more than $12.1 million in and their total expenditures over this improvements at Ryan Airfield. period. TABLE 1B State Grants Offered to TAA for Ryan Airfield Projects ADOT Grant Project Total Fiscal Year Number Description Grant Funds 1994 N557 Land Acquisition/Relocation $49,090 Pave Crosswind Runway, Land Acquisi- 1994 N517 $450,910 tion, Taxiway Reconstruction 1995 N617 Land Acquisition $500,000 1996 N719 Land Acquisition $965,000 Pave Crosswind Runway, Fire Protection, 1997 N851 $911,000 Storm Water Improvements, Service Road 1998 N857 Master Plan Update $150,000 1998 N873 Overlay Runway 6R/24L, Realign Twy B2 $131,150 1998 E9030 Pave Crosswind Runway $994,000 1999 E0124 Overlay Rwy 6R/24L, Realign Twy B2 $1,077,000 2000 E0170 Install Twy D Apron Ramp Parking $110,000 2000 E1124 AWOS, Land Acquisition, Fencing $936,000 2001 E2S21 Land Acquisition $555,300 2001 E1147 Taxiway/Apron Reconstruction $52,178 2002 E3S19 Apron Construction $550,000 2003 E3F40 Taxiway B Lighting, Airfield Drainage $42,201 2004 E4F10 GA Development Area Design $7,363 GA Development Area Construction, 2004 E5F47 $41,247 Emergency Generator 2004 E5F48 Update Airport Wide Basin Study $2,625 2005 E5S07 GA Development Area Utilities $246,000 2005 E5S08 Install MIRL Rwy 6R/24L $848,788 2006 E6S27 Taxiway & Entrance Road Improvements $855,000 2006 E6S39 Master Plan Update $315,000 2006 AMPM 06 AMPM $79,936 2006 E6F53 Airfield Security Fencing $2,831 GA Development Area Utilities, Fire 2007 E7S72 $716,603 Protection 2007 E7S73 Lighting Detection AWOS, Electrical Vault $169,466 2008 Pending Ryan Tower Equipment $10,418 2008 E8S30 Lighting Improvements $1,350,442 Total State Grant Funds $12,119,548 Source: TAA Records THE AIRPORT’S SYSTEM ROLE At the regional level, Ryan Airfield is included in the Pima Association of Airport planning exists on many le- Governments’ (PAG) 2002 Regional vels: local, regional, and national. Aviation System Plan (RASP).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ADOT's $5.7B CIP Budget Cuts Highway Spending to $3.5B
    Friday Volume 4 Issue 37 Issue Date: June 28, 2013 CONNECTING THE LOCAL BUILDING INDUSTRY ADOT’s $5.7B CIP Budget Cuts Highway Spending to $3.5B By Eric Jay Toll for The gavel pounded “approved” on In a time when maintaining the the detailed subscriber-only 2013 Arizona Builder’s a challenging $5.7B ADOT budget. system and meeting growing Capital Project Issue. The subscriber- only 2014 Capital Project Issue will Exchange When you take out $2.6B from economic demands screams for Maricopa and Pima county taxpayers more improvements and projects, be published July 30). This includes and $1.2B for airports, the rest of the agency had to slash more than Maricopa and Pima county taxpayer- Arizona gets a paltry $1.9B for roads. $350M from its projected budget. voted revenue, airport and transit spending—most of which is paid Legislative robbery, improved fuel To put the current five year plan with federal grants. economy, and recession-caused into perspective, last year ADOT revenue declines combined to drain projected that it would spend $5.5B State Spending Drops $2B over 5 capital dollars from the Arizona for highways between fiscal 2013 Years Department of Transportation. and 2017 (AZBEX, July 31, 2012 and The five year capital budget covering fiscal 2014-2018 is a $500M drop from last year. Combine this year’s reduction with cuts last year, and the 2014-2018 budget is $2.2B less than the 5-year plan adopted in 2011. At the same time, the state’s road system cries out for increases maintenance and expanded capacity at an even higher pace as the state starts its post-recession growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Strategic Business Plan
    AIRPORT STRATEGIC BUSINESS PLAN ___________________________ MARANA REGIONAL AIRPORT MARANA, ARIZONA | FEBRUARY 2017 Marana Regional Airport Airport Strategic Business Plan Final Report Prepared for Town of Marana, Arizona By The Genesis Consulting Group, LLC 1202 E Maryland Ave, Suite 1D Phoenix, AZ 85018 In Association With Armstrong Consultants, Inc. February 2017 ADOT No. E5S3N . TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 Marana Regional Airport – Business Plan .................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Airport Mission ............................................................................................................................................................... 2 Situational Analysis ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Overall Airport Development ...................................................................................................................................... 3 New Business Development Opportunities .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • San Manuel Airport Layout Plan Update and Narrative Report
    Draft Working Paper No. 1 INVENTORY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS AND FORECASTS OF AVIATION ACTIVITY San Manuel Airport Layout Plan PREPARED BY: Update & Narrative Report SAN MANUEL, ARIZONA | AUGUST 2020 DRAFT Airport Layout Plan Update Narrative Report - Working Paper No.1 Prepared for: San Manuel Airport (E77) San Manuel, Pinal County, Arizona August 2020 Prepared by: 7878 North 16th Street Suite 300 Phoenix, Arizona 85020 P. 602.957.1155 F. 602.957.2838 www.dibblecorp.com Dibble Project No. 1016114.02 SAN MANUEL AIRPORT | AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN UPDATE NARRATIVE REPORT Table of Contents Section 1— Introduction ___________________________________________________ 1–1 1.1 Background __________________________________________________________ 1–1 1.2 ALP Update Narrative Report Objective ____________________________________ 1–3 Section 2— Inventory of Existing Conditions _________________________________ 2–1 2.1 Airport Service Level and Role ___________________________________________ 2–1 2.2 Federal and State Grant Histories _________________________________________ 2–2 2.3 Airport Design Standards _______________________________________________ 2–2 2.4 Airside Inventory ______________________________________________________ 2–7 2.5 Landside Inventory ___________________________________________________ 2–11 2.6 Airport Environs _____________________________________________________ 2–16 2.7 Summary of Non-Standard Conditions ____________________________________ 2–19 Section 3— Forecasts of Aviation Activity_____________________________________ 3–1
    [Show full text]
  • Marana Regional Sports Complex
    Draft Environmental Assessment Marana Regional Sports Complex Town of Marana Pima County, Arizona U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Phoenix Area Office August 2008 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT MARANA REGIONAL SPORTS COMPLEX Prepared for Bureau of Reclamation 6150 West Thunderbird Road Glendale, Arizona 85306 Attn: John McGlothlen (623) 773-6256 on behalf of Town of Marana 11555 West Civic Center Drive, Building A2 Marana, Arizona 85653 Attn: Corby Lust Prepared by SWCA Environmental Consultants 2120 North Central Avenue, Suite 130 Phoenix, Arizona 85004 www.swca.com (602) 274-3831 SWCA Project No. 12313 i CONTENTS 1. PURPOSE AND NEED........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Purpose of and Need for the Project .............................................................................................1 1.3 Location........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.4 Public Involvement/Scoping Process ........................................................................................... 1 1.5 Conformance with Comprehensive Plans and Zoning ................................................................. 2 2. DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mobility Matters Throughout Our Lives. 2040 Regional Transportation Plan PAG and Regional Transportation Planning PAG and Regional Transportation Planning
    Adopted July 1, 2010 Mobility matters throughout our lives. 2040 Regional Transportation Plan PAG and Regional Transportation Planning PAG and Regional Transportation Planning Pima Association of Governments (PAG) is a nonprofit metropolitan planning organization (MPO) for the Pima County region. PAG’s planning area covers Pima County, a total area of 9,189 square miles, which is larger than some states. PAG is governed by a nine-member Regional Council with an elected official serving from each member jurisdiction, including the Cities of South Tucson and Tucson, Pima County, the Towns of Marana, Oro Valley and Sahuarita, the Pascua Yaqui Tribe, the Tohono O’odham Nation and the Arizona State Transportation Board. PAG’s mission is to help promote good decision making for the region by providing accurate data and encouraging consensus among its members and the public. PAG’s programs focus on cross-jurisdictional planning issues, such as air quality, water quality, population growth and transportation. One of PAG’s primary responsibilities as the MPO is to coordinate the development of the long-range regional transportation plan. This long-range plan represents the work of the regional community; input was provided by all the jurisdictions, many interest group representatives and the public at large. The 2040 RTP presents the collective vision for the transportation network for the next 30 years. PAG provides staff support for the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA), a government entity that manages the $2.1 billion, 20-year RTA plan, which was approved by Pima County voters on May 16, 2006. The RTA is governed by a nine-member board, which includes the same representatives who serve on the PAG Regional Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Marana Regional Airport Airport Master Plan Final Draft
    Marana Regional Airport Airport Master Plan Final Draft Prepared for Town of Marana, Arizona By Armstrong Consultants, Inc. 2345 S. Alma School Road, Suite 208 Mesa, AZ 85210 In association with The Genesis Consulting Group, LLC Woolpert, Inc. August 2016 ADOT No. E5S3N The preparation of this document was financed in part through a planning grant from the Arizona Department of Transportation. The contents of this report reflect the analysis and finding of Armstrong Consultants, Inc. who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the ADOT. Acceptance of this report by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) does not in any way constitute a commitment on the part of the United States to participate in any development depicted therein nor does it indicate that the proposed development is environmentally acceptable with applicable Public Laws. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 – Marana Regional Airport Master Plan Overview ................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Objectives ..............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Ntsb Reports
    2009 NTSB REPORTS NTSB Identification: WPR09CA110 14 CFR Part 91: General Aviation Accident occurred Wednesday, February 04, 2009 in Whitehall, MT Probable Cause Approval Date: 05/12/2009 Aircraft: Ercoupe 415D, registration: N87349 Injuries: 1 Uninjured. NTSB investigators used data provided by various entities, including, but not limited to, the Federal Aviation Administration and/or the operator and did not travel in support of this investigation to prepare this aircraft accident report. The pilot touched down beyond his point of intended landing and bounced. He added power, regained level flight, reduced power, and landed again. As he applied the brakes, he realized that the landing roll would exceed the amount of runway remaining available. He turned hard right to avoid a fence and a ditch. However, the left wing contacted the ground, and sustained substantial damage. The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident to be: The pilot's failure to attain the proper touchdown point and his failure to abort the landing. WPR09CA110 The pilot touched down beyond his point of intended landing and bounced. He added power, regained level flight, reduced power, and landed again. As he applied the brakes, he realized that the landing roll would exceed the amount of runway remaining available. He turned hard right to avoid a fence and a ditch. However, the left wing contacted the ground, and sustained substantial damage. NTSB Identification: WPR09CA126 14 CFR Part 91: General Aviation Accident occurred Thursday, February 19, 2009 in Camas, WA Probable Cause Approval Date: 05/12/2009 Aircraft: Ercoupe 415-E, registration: N94805 Injuries: 1 Uninjured.
    [Show full text]
  • Rio Vista Airport Pavement Management Plan, Drainage Assessment, and Electrical Plan
    Statement of Qualifications for Rio Vista Airport Pavement Management Plan, Drainage Assessment, and Electrical Plan Prepared for City of Rio Vista Prepared by Statement of Qualifications for RioRio VVistaista AAirportp Pavement Management Plan, DrainageiA AsseAssessment,ssment,ment,nt, and Electrical Plan July 22, 2010 765 The City Drive Suite 400 Mr. John Andoh Orange, California Transit & Airport Coordinator 92868 City of Rio Vista TEL 714 939 1030 FAX 714 938 9488 One Main Street Rio Vista, CA 94571 Re: Statement of Interest and Qualifications for Professional Airport Engineering Design and Planning Services for the City of Rio Vista and the Rio Vista Municipal Airport Dear Mr. Andoh: The City of Rio Vista is looking for the most qualified airport consultant to work with the City to improve the Rio Vista Municipal Airport. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (Kimley-Horn) is that firm. We believe that Kimley-Horn is the right choice for the City based on the following: History of Stability and Strong California Presence. Kimley-Horn is an employee owned, national firm. Since its inception in 1967, our firm has never been sold or acquired, or merged with other entities. Furthermore, we are ranked in the top 20 national aviation firms by ENR, have been ranked No.1 firm to work for by CE News several times, and are in the top 100 companies to work for by Fortune. Kimley-Horn is stable. We are consistent and we’re not going anywhere. We are confident that the people and the company you see in California today will be the people and company you see for the life of your projects.
    [Show full text]
  • APA NEWSLETTER 2013 September Asa Dean, Editor
    Arizona Pilots Association http://www.azpilots.org Page 1 of 24 2013-08-29 16:22 APA NEWSLETTER 2013 September Asa Dean, Editor Table of Contents President's Report........................................................3 Tommy Thomason, APA President................................3 Executive Director’s Report, Sep, 2013......................3 Jim Timm, Executive Director.......................................3 September Aviation Accident Summary......................5 Jim Timm......................................................................5 GA Industry Rallies to Oppose Cylinder NPRM........7 Submitted by Mark Spencer..........................................7 From the Flight Deck - September..............................8 Roy Evans II..................................................................8 GAARMS REPORT: 2013 August 19 ........................9 Fred Gibbs.....................................................................9 Runway Incursions; Compliance and Influence........12 Barbara Harper, ATP CFII MEI LRJet.........................12 Doolittle Raiders - Final Toast...................................13 By Bob Greene, CNN Contributor, submitted by Tod Dickey.........................................................................13 COPPERSTATE Fly-In Is Non-Towered This Year..16 Please be extra vigilant ...............................................16 COPPERSTATE Fly-In.............................................17 Treasure Hunt - Poker Run........................................18 Submitted by Barbara Harper......................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018
    Request for Qualifications Arizona Department of Solicitation No. Administration ADSPO18-00007887 State Procurement Office Description: 100 N 15th Ave., Suite 201 2018 Professional Services List Phoenix, AZ 85007 Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 ATTACHMENT 1 ........ OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE FORM ...................................... 2 ATTACHMENT 2-A .... EXPERIENCE AND CAPACITY ............................................. 3 1.0 ..... FIVE (5) EXAMPLE PROJECTS ...................................................................... 3 ATTACHMENT 2-A .... EXPERIENCE AND CAPACITY ............................................. 5 2.0 ..... EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE ......................................................................... 5 3.0 ..... FIRMS EXPERIENCE AND REVENUE ........................................................... 7 4.0 ..... FIRMS SERVICES ........................................................................................... 7 5.0 ..... EXPERIENCE REFERENCES: ........................................................................ 8 ATTACHMENT 2-B .... ORGANIZATION PROFILE .................................................. 10 ATTACHMENT 3-A .... METHOD PROPOSAL .......................................................... 12 ATTACHMENT 3-B .... KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSAL ........................................... 13 ATTACHMENT 3-C ... PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS ..................................... 29 ATTACHMENT 3-D ... PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE ........................................... 31 ATTACHMENT 3-E .... ISRAEL
    [Show full text]
  • Report Cover.Ai
    Appendix C 14 CFR PART 150 REVIEW Appendix C 14 CFR Part 150 Review INVENTORY Ryan Airfield INTRODUCTION The purpose of this review is to provide an assessment for the current Noise Compati- bility Study by reexamining the noise and land use conditions at Ryan Airfield and the surrounding area. The information presented in this section will be used to identify existing and future noise-sensitive areas that may be adversely impacted by aircraft noise and to evaluate the current strategies to mitigate or avoid those impacts. The information in this chapter includes: A discussion of the purpose and procedures required to undertake a Noise Compati- bility Program, as described under Title 14, Part 150 of the Code of Federal Regula- tions (CFR) (formerly referred to as F.A.R. Part 150). A description of airport facilities, airspace, and airport operating procedures. A discussion of the roles and responsibilities for each of the entities impacted by aircraft activity from Ryan Airfield. An overview of the land use planning documents and tools applicable within the area surrounding the airport. The information outlined in this appendix was obtained through on-site inspections, interviews with airport staff, airport tenants, and representatives of Pima County Planning, the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT), and the Federal Avia- C-1 tion Administration (FAA). Information was also obtained from available documents concerning the airport and the Tucson area. This review is being prepared concurrently with the Airport Master Plan Update for Ryan Airfield. This provides ample opportunity for the full assessment of potential noise impacts of alternative master planning strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 142/Wednesday, July 28, 2021/Proposed Rules
    40386 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 28, 2021 / Proposed Rules of the local flight standards district office/ West Building Ground Floor, Room by submitting such written data, views, certificate holding district office. W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, or arguments, as they may desire. (i) Related Information Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) Comments that provide the factual basis (1) For more information about this AD 366–9826, or (800) 647–5527. You must supporting the views and suggestions contact Mike Kiesov, Aviation Safety identify FAA Docket No. FAA–2021– presented are particularly helpful in Engineer, General Aviation & Rotorcraft 0590/Airspace Docket No. 21–AWP–43, developing reasoned regulatory Section, International Validation Branch, at the beginning of your comments. You decisions on the proposal. Comments FAA, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, may also submit comments through the are specifically invited on the overall MO 64106; phone: (816) 329–4144; fax: (816) internet at https://www.regulations.gov. regulatory, aeronautical, economic, 329–4090; email: [email protected]. You may review the public docket environmental, and energy-related (2) Refer to Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) containing the proposal, any comments aspects of the proposal. of New Zealand AD No. DCA/750XL/34, received, and any final disposition in Communications should identify both effective date February 7, 2019, for more docket numbers and be submitted in information. You may examine the CAA AD person in the Dockets Office between in the AD docket at https:// 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday triplicate to the address listed above.
    [Show full text]