A Study of the 1920S New Drama Adaptations of Southeast Flies the Peacock
The Peacock on Stage and in Print: A Study of the 1920s New Drama Adaptations of Southeast Flies the Peacock Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Man He Graduate Program in East Asian Languages and Literatures The Ohio State University 2009 Thesis Committee: Kirk Denton, Advisor Patricia Sieber Copyright by Man He 2009 Abstract This thesis is a revisionist study examining the Chinese new drama, xinju, of the 1920s, a field that has suffered from relative critical neglect and oversimplification. Situating my study in the field of cultural production, depicted by Pierre Bourdieu as an “economic world reversed,” I continue to investigate how the “three principles,” identified by Michel Hockx as constituting the structure of modern Chinese cultural production, commanded different agents in the field of new drama to share and/or compete for symbolic, economical and political capitals. In so doing, this thesis problematizes a series of binaries, namely, “old”/“new,” “West”/“China,” and “professional”/“amateur,” which have unfortunately served as the foundations of the monolithic imagination of Chinese modernity since at least the May Fourth movement. To sufficiently argue against such schematization, the focus of this thesis is on a particular set of texts—a series of new drama adaptations of the ballad, Southeast Flies the Peacock (Kongque dongnan fei) that were circulated either as script or stage performances, or both in the 1920s. Through a close examination of the production and consumption of these printed scripts and stage performances, this thesis reveals the constant confrontations, compromises, and negotiations between the binaries of the West and China, the iconoclastic and the traditional, the reformative and the conservative, and the “new” and the “old” during the early formation of Chinese new drama at the turn of the twentieth century.
[Show full text]