Noaa 154 Pages
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Description of economic data collected with a random sample of commercial reef fish boats in the Florida Keys Item Type monograph Authors Waters, James R.; Rhodes, Raymond J.; Wiggers, Robert Publisher NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service Download date 05/10/2021 18:40:26 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/20306 NOAA Technical Report NMFS 154 U.S. Department A Scientific Paper of the FISHERY BULLETIN of Commerce November 2001 Description of Economic Data Collected with a Random Sample of Commercial Reef Fish Boats in the Florida Keys James R. Waters Raymond J. Rhodes Robert Wiggers NOAA Technical Report NMFS 154 A Scientific Paper of the Fishery Bulletin Description of Economic Data Collected with a Random Sample of Commercial Reef Fish Boats in the Florida Keys James R. Waters Raymond J. Rhodes Robert Wiggers November 2001 U.S. Department of Commerce Seattle, Washington Suggested reference Waters, James R., Raymond J. Rhodes, and Robert Wiggers. 2001. Description of economic data collected with a random sample of commercial reef fish boats in the Florida Keys. U.S. Dep. Commer., NOAA Tech. Rep. NMFS 154, 45 p. Online dissemination This report is posted online in PDF format at http://spo.nwr.noaa.gov (click on Technical Reports link). Purchasing additional copies Additional copies of this report are available for purchase in paper copy or microfiche from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161; 1-800-553-NTIS; http://www.ntis.gov. Copyright law Although the contents of the Technical Reports have not been copyrighted and may be reprinted entirely, reference to source is appreciated. Proprietary products The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) does not approve, recommend, or endorse any proprietary product or proprietary material mentioned in this publication. No reference shall be made to NMFS, or to this publication furnished by NMFS, in any advertising or sales promotion which would indicate or imply that NMFS approves, recommends, or endorses any proprietary product or proprietary material mentioned herein, or which has as its purpose an intent to cause directly or indirectly the advertised product to be used or purchased because of this NMFS publication. 1 ABSTRACT–This study summarizes the Description of Economic Data Collected with a results of a survey designed to provide economic information about the finan Random Sample of Commercial Reef Fish Boats cial status of commercial reef fish boats in the Florida Keys with homeports in the Florida Keys. A survey questionnaire was administered in the summer and fall of 1994 by interview James R. Waters ers in face-to-face meetings with owners National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA or operators of randomly selected boats. 101 Piver’s Island Road Fishermen were asked for background Beaufort, North Carolina 28516 information about themselves and their E-mail: [email protected] boats, their capital investments in boats and equipment, and about their average catches, revenues, and costs per trip for Raymond J. Rhodes their two most important kinds of fishing trips during 1993 for species in the reef Robert Wiggers fish fishery. Respondents were character South Carolina Department of Natural Resources ized with regard to their dependence on Marine Resources Division the reef fish fishery as a source of house Office of Fisheries Management hold income. Boats were described in P.O. Box 12559 terms of their physical and financial char Charleston, South Carolina 29422 acteristics. Different kinds of fishing trips were identified by the species that gen erated the greatest revenue. Trips were grouped into the following categories: yel lowtail snapper (Ocyurus chrysurus); mutton snapper (Lutjanus analis), black grouper posed regulations. This report pres (Mycteroperca bonaci), or red grouper (Epi Introduction nephelus morio); gray snapper (Lutjanus gri ents results from a recent survey that seus); deeper water groupers and tilefishes; Bays, coral reefs, and offshore waters collected basic economic information greater amberjack (Seriola dumerili); spiny of the Florida Keys support commer- about commercial fishing for reef lobster (Panulirus argus); king mackerel cial and recreational fisheries for reef fishes in the Florida Keys. Our objec (Scomberomorus cavalla); and dolphin (Cory fishes and other species. Many of the tives are to develop a stratified ran phaena hippurus). Average catches, reve nues, routine trip costs, and net operating reef fishes, including snappers (Lut- dom survey of commercial reef fish revenues per boat per trip and per boat janidae), groupers (Serranidae), por- boats with homeports in the Florida per year were estimated for each category gies (Sparidae), grunts (Haemulidae), Keys; summarize characteristics of of fishing trips. In addition to its descrip triggerfishes (Balistidae), wrasses (Lab- respondents and their boats; and tive value, data collected during this study ridae), tilefishes (Malacanthidae), and estimate average catches, revenues, will aid in future examinations of the eco nomic effects of various regulations on jacks (Carangidae), are vulnerable to routine harvesting costs, and net op commercial reef fish fishermen. overfishing because of their life his- erating revenues per trip and per year tory characteristics that include rela- for commercial reef fish boats. The tively sedentary behavior, slow growth, information presented here will be low natural mortality, large body size, delayed reproduction, and sex rever- 1 Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Com sal for some species (SEFSC, 1992). As mission. 1999. Marine Fisheries Regulations a result, the Florida Marine Fisheries [Management Plans]. Internet website avail- Commission1, the South Atlantic Fish- able at http://marinefisheries.org/mfc46.htm. 2 ery Management Council2, and the South Atlantic Fishery Management Coun cil. 1983. Fishery Management Plan, Regula- Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management tory Impact Review, and Final Environmental Council3 have implemented regula- Impact Statement for the Snapper-Grouper tions to conserve and rebuild depleted Fishery of the South Atlantic Region. One Southpark Circle, Southpark Building, Suite populations of reef fishes. 306, Charleston, S.C. 29407. Scarcity of economic data has been 3 Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Coun a problem in the development of reg- cil. 1981. (Revised) Environmental Impact Statement and Fishery Management Plan for ulations for reef fishes. Data about Reef Fish Resources of the Gulf of Mexico. total pounds landed and total ex-ves- Lincoln Center, Suite 881, 5401 West Ken sel value are available4, but there is nedy Boulevard, Tampa, FL 33609. little information about the financial 4 Data are maintained by the Office of Fisher ies Statistics, National Marine Fisheries Ser performance of commercial reef fish vice, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, 75 boats or the economic effects of pro- Virginia Beach Drive, Miami, FL 33149. 2 NOAA Technical Report NMFS 154 made available to fishery managers to assist in their as more kinds of fishing trips. Interviews were performed sessments of the consequences of proposed regulations under subcontract by Roper Starch Worldwide, Inc., a for the commercial reef fish fishery. firm that specializes in research surveys for both the This report is the third in a series of three about eco public and private sectors. nomic surveys of the commercial reef fish fisheries in the southeastern United States. Waters5 reported on a Sampling design similar survey of 196 commercial reef fish boats in the Gulf of Mexico. Waters, Rhodes, Waltz, and Wiggers6 The Florida Keys, by virtue of their unique location described a survey of 147 commercial snapper-grouper between the Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico, estab boats along the Atlantic coast from North Carolina to lish the boundary between the federal jurisdictions of south Florida. In an unrelated survey, Suman and Shiv the South Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Fishery Man lani7 interviewed 337 fishermen in the Florida Keys to agement Councils. The South Atlantic Fishery Man examine where they fished during 1995 in relation to agement Council has responsibility for management the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary and to esti of fisheries in federal waters south and east of the Flor mate species caught, relative effort in various fisheries, ida Keys, whereas the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Manage and trip costs per fishery. ment Council has jurisdiction in federal waters west and north of the Keys. Depending on where they fish, fisher men may have to comply with regulations established Materials and methods by one or both regional fishery management councils, as well as the state of Florida which manages fisheries in Our survey consisted of three questionnaires (see state waters. Appendix 1). First, a screening questionnaire was used To fish commercially for reef fishes in federal waters, to record each attempt to telephone owners of ran both regional fishery management councils require per domly selected boats, verify their boat’s eligibility for mits. The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) is inclusion in the survey, and set up an appointment sues reef fish permits for boats that fish commercially for a face-to-face interview with the owner or operator. for reef fishes managed by the Gulf Council under its Second, the basic questionnaire was used to obtain Fishery Management Plan for the Reef Fish Resources background information about respondents and their of the Gulf of Mexico.8 NMFS issues snapper-grouper