DOCSLIB.ORG

Περίληψη : King of Thrace (Ca

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Περίληψη : King of Thrace (Ca IΔΡΥΜA ΜΕΙΖΟΝΟΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ Συγγραφή : Δημητριάδου Δάφνη Μετάφραση : Νάκας Ιωάννης (19/5/2008) Για παραπομπή : Δημητριάδου Δάφνη , "Lysimachus", 2008, Εγκυκλοπαίδεια Μείζονος Ελληνισμού, Μ. Ασία URL: <http://www.ehw.gr/l.aspx?id=10251> Περίληψη : King of Thrace (ca. 323-281 BC), one of Alexander the Great's successors. He took control of Thrace and gradually extended his dominion to the Hellespont, Macedonia and Asia Minor. He was considered to be capable, but ruthless and not a particularly amiable ruler. He supported the creation and the development of urban centres mainly in Asia Minor. His decision to execute his son Agathocles caused riots in cities of Asia Minor and the intervention of Seleucus I Nikator. Τόπος και Χρόνος Γέννησης Between 361 and 351 BC - Macedonia Τόπος και Χρόνος Θανάτου February 281 BC - Korypedion (Kouropedion) Κύρια Ιδιότητα King 1. Biography Lysimachus, son of Agathocles, was born in Macedonia, but his origin was from an aristocratic family of Thessaly. His father was a close friend of Phillip II, whereas he had become a citizen of Pella and belonged to the bodyguards of Alexander III the Great.1 Lysimachus took four wives. Around 320 BC he married Nicaea, daughter of Antipatros and widow of Perdiccas. They had three or four children: his beloved son Agathocles, Arsinoe I, Eurydice and most probably another daughter. In 311 BC he asked for the hand of Cleopatra, sister of Alexander the Great, who, however, refused. In 302 BC he married Amastrida from Herakleia of Pontus, daughter of Oxyartes, niece of Darius and ex wife of Crateros, with which he did not have any offspring.2 Not many things are known about Lysimachus’third wedding apart from the fact that his wife was from Odrysia and that they had a son, Alexander. Around 299 BC he divorced Amastrida and married Arsinoe II Philadelphos, daughter of Ptolemy I and his second wife Berenice and sister of Ptolemy II Philadephos, with which he had three sons.3 2. Establishment of Lysimachus After the death of Alexander in 323 BC Lysimachus was given the supervision of Thrace. When the First War of the Successors broke out two years later, he took the side of Antipatros, Crateros and Antigonus I One-Eyed against Perdikkas and Eumenes. The assassination of Perdikkas, the death of Crateros and the successful efforts of Eumenes led to a compromised control over the unpleasant situation created in Alexander’s empire. The agreement between the Successors was signed in Triparadeisos of Northern Syria in 321/320 BC and resulted in strengthening the position of Antipatros, as well as the position of Antigonus. Lysimachus improved further his relations with Antipatros by taking his daughter Nicaea as a wife.4 After the victory of Antigonus I against Eumenes, which marked his control over Asia, the Second War of the Successors broke out. In 315 BC Lysimachus along with Cassander and Ptolemy I turned against Antigonus to stop his expansion towards Macedonia. The war lasted until 311 BC, when Antigonus signed a peace treaty keeping his rights over Asia Minor.5 In 305/304 BC Lysimachus, following the example of Antigonus, Ptolemy, Cassandros and Seleucus, adopted the title of “basileus”( king).6 The war which had started between Antigonus and the rest of the Successors ended in 301 BC with the battle of Ipsus in Phrygia, where Antigonus was defeated and lost his life. During the redistribution of the dominions of Alexander’s empire Lysimachus was mostly favoured, adding to his dominion the regions Antigonus once held in Asia Minor until the mountains of Taurus.7 Δημιουργήθηκε στις 2/10/2021 Σελίδα 1/7 IΔΡΥΜA ΜΕΙΖΟΝΟΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ Συγγραφή : Δημητριάδου Δάφνη Μετάφραση : Νάκας Ιωάννης (19/5/2008) Για παραπομπή : Δημητριάδου Δάφνη , "Lysimachus", 2008, Εγκυκλοπαίδεια Μείζονος Ελληνισμού, Μ. Ασία URL: <http://www.ehw.gr/l.aspx?id=10251> In 297 BC, after Cassandros’death, conflicts broke out in Macedonia between his sons for the succession to the throne. This gave Lysimachus, Demetrius I Poliorcetes, son of Antigonus, and to Pyrrhus of Epirus the opportunity to engage and face each other for the conquest of the kingdom. Lysimachus offered shelter to Cassandros’son Antipatros I, when he was exiled by Pyrrhus and probably then he gave him as a wife his daughter Eurydice. Some time later, however, he murdered him and also imprisoned his own daughter.8 During this entire period (297-288 BC) he was in constant conflict with Demetrios, who, having obtained the throne of Macedonia, was trying to take advantage of the difficulties Lysimachus had with the Getes of Dromichetes and to invade Thrace.9 Lysimachus reacted by allying with Pyrrhus and both invaded Macedonia and drove Demetrios out, who, however, managed to escape and started gathering military forces to invade Asia Minor. Lysimachus then made an alliance with Seleucus, Pyrrhus and Ptolemy I to stop him. Demetrios passed to Asia Minor, but was defeated by Lysimachus’son Agathocles, in 286 BC, and sought refuge to the regions of Seleucus, where he was imprisoned. In 285/284 BC Lysimachus on his part drove Pyrrhus out of Macedonia and extended his kingdom up to Thessaly.10 3. Lysimachus’end In approximately forty years and without any special achievements, at least before Ipsus, Lysimachus systematically established his power initially over Thrace and then over Phrygia on the Hellespont, Macedonia and the entire Asia Minor. In 309 BC he founded the capital of his state, Lysimacheia on the European side of the Hellespont. In 286 BC he was at the peak of his power. The tension between him and Seleucus, already existing since the years after Ipsus, became more intense. The latter did not hesitate to take advantage of an internal quarrel of the house of Lysimachus and the consequences it had to the cities of Asia Minor and invaded the region. More specifically, in 283/282 BC Lysimachus suspected his son Agathocles for a conspiracy against him, condemned and executed him. According to sources, Agathocles was the victim of a plot of Lysimachus’wife Arsinoe II; it is assumed that she was afraid for her life and for the fortune of her children when the time of succession would come. Agathocles’wife Lyssandra, daughter of Ptolemy I from his first wife Eurydice, sought refuge to Seleucus I Nikator asking for revenge. Some cities of Asia Minor who were friendly towards Agathocles, like Pergamon, mutinied and turned to Seleucus asking for his intervention. The two men confronted each other at Korypedion, in Western Asia Minor, in 281 BC. In the battle which took place Lysimachus was killed. His body was transported to Thrace and he was buried near Lysimacheia.11 4. Numismatic policy Lysimachus apparently did not mint any coins before the battle of Ipsus, apart from a series of tetrovola (four obols), which was minted in Lysimacheia. After the annexation of Asia Minor he continued minting drachmas with the types and the name of Alexander III in Lysimacheia, Lampsacus, Abydus, Teos, Colophon and Magnesia. Around 299-296 BC the same cities started minting drachmas with the royal title of Lysimachus (ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΣ ΛΥΣΙΜΑΧΟΥ). In 297/296 BC he introduced new coins of the Athenian measuring regulation, the so-called “lysimachoi”. Their obverse bears the head of the deified Alexander and their reverseAthena as Victory. In contrast to Demetrios I and Ptolemy I, Lysimachus avoided putting his portrait on his coins; he, however, maintained his name and title on the reverse. These coins were minted in many cities of his dominion, such as Lysimacheia, Lampsakos, Abydus, Sardeis and Colophon. To these Ephesus and Miletus were added after 294 BC, Amphipolis in 288 BC, Smyrna in 287 BC and Pella in 285 BC.12 Lysimachus’death at Korypedion did not stop the production of coins with his types and name. The lysimachoi were minted during the entire 3rd century BC from various mints, with that of Byzantium being the most important one. They were so popular, as the post-mortem mints of Alexander, a coin politically neutral and acceptable to the entire Hellenistic world.13 5. The cities of Asia Minor Δημιουργήθηκε στις 2/10/2021 Σελίδα 2/7 IΔΡΥΜA ΜΕΙΖΟΝΟΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ Συγγραφή : Δημητριάδου Δάφνη Μετάφραση : Νάκας Ιωάννης (19/5/2008) Για παραπομπή : Δημητριάδου Δάφνη , "Lysimachus", 2008, Εγκυκλοπαίδεια Μείζονος Ελληνισμού, Μ. Ασία URL: <http://www.ehw.gr/l.aspx?id=10251> The general attitude of Lysimachus towards the cities of Asia Minor does not present any novelty. He basically adopted the policy of Cassandros and of Antigonus I. There are no clear indications that he was any stricter than Antigonus I or Demetrius I. Cities were practically subjects and not allies of every ruler. Lysimachus controlled the Ionian League through one of his generals. He imposed taxes to every productive activity and supported tyrannical regimes in Samos, Herakleia of Pontus and maybe in Priene, Ilion and Nisyros.14 Lysimachus continued building, and in some cases completed, settlements which were started by Antigonus I, like in Smyrna, where he moved the inhabitants of the surrounding settlements to the urban centre founding New Smyrna.15 A characteristic of his policy was the change of the name of cities. Thus, he changed the name of Antigoneia Bithyniake to Nicaea, of Ephesus to Arsinoeia and of Smyrna to Eurydiceia. The new names in the last two cases did not live after his death. Nicaea, however, kept her new name and developed into an important centre of the Hellenistic and Roman world. Lysimachus did not found important cities with the exception of his capital Lysimacheia in Thrace. The foundation of this city resulted in turning the city of Kardia, the inhabitants of which he moved to Lysimacheia, into a village.16 6.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • VU Research Portal
    VU Research Portal The impact of empire on market prices in Babylon Pirngruber, R. 2012 document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in VU Research Portal citation for published version (APA) Pirngruber, R. (2012). The impact of empire on market prices in Babylon: in the Late Achaemenid and Seleucid periods, ca. 400 - 140 B.C. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. E-mail address: [email protected] Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 THE IMPACT OF EMPIRE ON MARKET PRICES IN BABYLON in the Late Achaemenid and Seleucid periods, ca. 400 – 140 B.C. R. Pirngruber VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT THE IMPACT OF EMPIRE ON MARKET PRICES IN BABYLON in the Late Achaemenid and Seleucid periods, ca. 400 – 140 B.C. ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad Doctor aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, op gezag van de rector magnificus prof.dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Demetrius Poliorcetes and the Hellenic League
    DEMETRIUSPOLIORCETES AND THE HELLENIC LEAGUE (PLATE 33) 1. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND D JURING the six years, 307/6-302/1 B.C., issues were raised and settled which shaped the course of western history for a long time to come. The epoch was alike critical for Athens, Hellas, and the Macedonians. The Macedonians faced squarely during this period the decision whether their world was to be one world or an aggregate of separate kingdoms with conflicting interests, and ill-defined boundaries, preserved by a precarious balance of power and incapable of common action against uprisings of Greek and oriental subjects and the plundering appetites of surrounding barbarians. The champion of unity was King Antigonus the One- Eyed, and his chief lieutenant his brilliant but unstatesmanlike son, King Demetrius the Taker of Cities, a master of siege operations and of naval construction and tactics, more skilled in organizing the land-instruments of warfare than in using them on the battle field. The final campaign between the champions of Macedonian unity and disunity opened in 307 with the liberation of Athens by Demetrius and ended in 301 B.C. with the Battle of the Kings, when Antigonus died in a hail of javelins and Demetrius' cavalry failed to penetrate a corps of 500 Indian elephants in a vain effort to rescue hinm. Of his four adversaries King Lysimachus and King Kassander left no successors; the other two, Kings Ptolemy of Egypt and Seleucus of Syria, were more fortunate, and they and Demetrius' able son, Antigonus Gonatas, planted the three dynasties with whom the Romans dealt and whom they successively destroyed in wars spread over 44 years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ptolemies: an Unloved and Unknown Dynasty. Contributions to a Different Perspective and Approach
    THE PTOLEMIES: AN UNLOVED AND UNKNOWN DYNASTY. CONTRIBUTIONS TO A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE AND APPROACH JOSÉ DAS CANDEIAS SALES Universidade Aberta. Centro de História (University of Lisbon). Abstract: The fifteen Ptolemies that sat on the throne of Egypt between 305 B.C. (the date of assumption of basileia by Ptolemy I) and 30 B.C. (death of Cleopatra VII) are in most cases little known and, even in its most recognised bibliography, their work has been somewhat overlooked, unappreciated. Although boisterous and sometimes unloved, with the tumultuous and dissolute lives, their unbridled and unrepressed ambitions, the intrigues, the betrayals, the fratricides and the crimes that the members of this dynasty encouraged and practiced, the Ptolemies changed the Egyptian life in some aspects and were responsible for the last Pharaonic monuments which were left us, some of them still considered true masterpieces of Egyptian greatness. The Ptolemaic Period was indeed a paradoxical moment in the History of ancient Egypt, as it was with a genetically foreign dynasty (traditions, language, religion and culture) that the country, with its capital in Alexandria, met a considerable economic prosperity, a significant political and military power and an intense intellectual activity, and finally became part of the world and Mediterranean culture. The fifteen Ptolemies that succeeded to the throne of Egypt between 305 B.C. (date of assumption of basileia by Ptolemy I) and 30 B.C. (death of Cleopatra VII), after Alexander’s death and the division of his empire, are, in most cases, very poorly understood by the public and even in the literature on the topic.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Roman Events
    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
    [Show full text]
  • Περίληψη : Demetrius Poliorcetes (337 B.C.-283 B.C.) Was One of the Diadochi (Successors) of Alexander the Great
    IΔΡΥΜA ΜΕΙΖΟΝΟΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ Συγγραφή : Παναγοπούλου Κατερίνα Μετάφραση : Βελέντζας Γεώργιος Για παραπομπή : Παναγοπούλου Κατερίνα , "Demetrius Poliorcetes", Εγκυκλοπαίδεια Μείζονος Ελληνισμού, Κωνσταντινούπολη URL: <http://www.ehw.gr/l.aspx?id=7727> Περίληψη : Demetrius Poliorcetes (337 B.C.-283 B.C.) was one of the Diadochi (Successors) of Alexander the Great. He initially co-ruled with his father, Antigonus I Monophthalmos, in western Asia Minor and participated in campaigns to Asia and mainland Greece. After the heavy defeat and death of Monophthalmos in Ipsus (301 B.C.), he managed to increase his few dominions and ascended to the Macedonian throne (294-287 B.C.). He spent the last years of his life captured by Seleucus I in Asia Minor. Άλλα Ονόματα Poliorcetes Τόπος και Χρόνος Γέννησης 337/336 BC – Macedonia Τόπος και Χρόνος Θανάτου 283 BC – Asia Minor Κύρια Ιδιότητα Hellenistic king 1. Youth Son of Antigonus I Monophthalmos and (much younger) Stratonice, daughter of the notable Macedonian Corrhaeus, Demetrius I Poliorcetes was born in 337/6 B.C. in Macedonia and died in 283 B.C. in Asia Minor. His younger brother, Philip, was born in Kelainai, the capital of Phrygia Major, as Stratonice had followed her husband in the Asia Minor campaign. Demetrius spent his childhood in Kelainai and is supposed to have received mainly military education.1 At the age of seventeen he married Phila, daughter of the Macedonian general and supervisor of Macedonia, Antipater, and widow of Antipater’s expectant successor, Craterus. The marriage must have served political purposes, as Antipater had been appointed commander of the Macedonian district towards the end of the First War of the Succesors (321-320 B.C.).
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF Datastream
    A Dividing Sea The Adriatic World from the Fourth to the First Centuries BC By Keith Robert Fairbank, Jr. B.A. Brigham Young University, 2010 M.A. Brigham Young University, 2012 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Program in Ancient History at Brown University PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND MAY 2018 © Copyright 2018 by Keith R. Fairbank, Jr. This dissertation by Keith R. Fairbank, Jr. is accepted in its present form by the Program in Ancient History as satisfying the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date _______________ ____________________________________ Graham Oliver, Advisor Recommended to the Graduate Council Date _______________ ____________________________________ Peter van Dommelen, Reader Date _______________ ____________________________________ Lisa Mignone, Reader Approved by the Graduate Council Date _______________ ____________________________________ Andrew G. Campbell, Dean of the Graduate School iii CURRICULUM VITAE Keith Robert Fairbank, Jr. hails from the great states of New York and Montana. He grew up feeding cattle under the Big Sky, serving as senior class president and continuing on to Brigham Young University in Utah for his BA in Humanities and Classics (2010). Keith worked as a volunteer missionary for two years in Brazil, where he learned Portuguese (2004–2006). Keith furthered his education at Brigham Young University, earning an MA in Classics (2012). While there he developed a curriculum for accelerated first year Latin focused on competency- based learning. He matriculated at Brown University in fall 2012 in the Program in Ancient History. While at Brown, Keith published an appendix in The Landmark Caesar. He also co- directed a Mellon Graduate Student Workshop on colonial entanglements.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorism Illuminati
    t er r o r ism AN D T H E Illu m in at i a t h r ee t h o u sa n d yea r h ist o r y by d av id Liv in g sto n e TERRORISM AND THE ILLUMINATI TERRORISM AND THE ILLUMINATI A Three Thousand Year HISTORy DAVID LIVINGSTONE BOOKSURGE LLC TERRORISM AND THE ILLUMINATI A Three Thousand Year History All Rights Reserved © 2007 by David Livingstone No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, or by any information storage retrieval system, without the written permission of the publisher. BookSurge LLC For information address: BookSurge LLC An Amazon.com company 7290 B Investment Drive Charleston, SC 29418 www.booksurge.com ISBN: 1-4196-6125-6 Printed in the United States of America And among mankind there is he whose talk “ about the life of this world will impress you, and he calls “ on God as a witness to what is in his heart. Yet, he is the most stringent of opponents. The Holy Koran, chapter 2: 204 If the American people knew what we have done, “ “ they would string us up from the lamp posts. George H.W. Bush Table of Contents Introduction: The Clash of Civilizations 1 Chapter 1: The Lost Tribes The Luciferian Bloodline 7 The Fallen Angels 8 The Medes 11 The Scythians 13 Chapter 2: The Kabbalah Zionism 15 The Chaldean Magi 16 Ancient Greece 17 Plato 19 Alexander 22 Chapter 3: Mithraism Cappadocia 25 The Mithraic Bloodline 28 The Jewish Revolt 32 The Mysteries of Mithras 33 Chapter 4: Gnosticism Herod the Great 37 Paul the Gnostic
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Coin Images on Modern Coins
    Ancient Coin Images on Modern Coins History of coin art can be traced consistently from ancient to modern times. Images of animals followed the first amorphous symbols. Then came the first depictions of gods and goddesses, and finally, rulers themselves appeared on their coins: after their death, at first, but very soon during their lifetime. The following coins, however, do not primarily bear the images of sovereigns. They first and foremost show images of women: of women from ancient times, followed by their counterparts from modernity. As the comparison shows, surprisingly little has changed in the meantime… 1 von 27 www.sunflower.ch Kingdom of Macedonia, Alexander III the Great (336-323 BC), Stater, 330-323 BC, Amphipolis Denomination: Stater Mint Authority: King Alexander III of Macedon Mint: Amphipolis Year of Issue: -330 Weight (g): 9 Diameter (mm): 19.0 Material: Gold Owner: Sunflower Foundation This stater was issued by Alexander the Great. The obverse depicts the Greek goddess Athena wearing a Corinthian helmet, while the reverse shows a Nike, the Greek personification of victory. One of Alexander's many achievements was the establishment of a single currency in his huge realm. These "imperial coins" replaced the wide variety of local issues. Only the Romans were to achieve something like that in their empire again. 2 von 27 www.sunflower.ch Subalpine Republic, 20 Francs (Marengo) Year 10 (1800- 1801) Denomination: 20 Francs (Marengo) Mint Authority: Subalpine Republic Mint: Turin or Paris Year of Issue: 1801 Weight (g): 6.44 Diameter (mm): 23.0 Material: Gold Owner: Sunflower Foundation In 1800, the French army under Napoleon Bonaparte conquered northern Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Carthage, Macedon, the Seleucids James Thorne 1. Se
    rivals for empire: carthage, macedon, the seleucids 113 Rivals foR empiRe: CaRthage, maCedon, the seleuCids james thorne 1. Setting: the Mediterranean Powers after Alexander1 livy, following his narrative for 318 bc, digresses to ponder: what would have been the outcome had alexander lived on and marched on the West? his conclusion is unsurprising: a sad fate for alexander at the hands of the great Roman fathers of the era, especially if the fearsome republic of Car- thage ‘joined to Rome by an ancient treaty’ had been brought into play (9.17–19). the annalist’s confidence in the strength of an as yet adolescent Roman empire need not concern us; the striking thing, in terms of the ancient mediterranean’s international relations, is that he thinks of just three great powers. if such a simple situation did exist in 323, it disappeared quickly, only to reappear briefly at the beginning of the 2nd Century. from 323 the macedonian-cum-persian empire disintegrated into five major parts, then reconsolidated to the three i will discuss in this chapter (under the antigonids, seleucids, and ptolemies); eventually the last of these col- lapsed, and Carthage was eliminated. this left Rome, philip v, and antio- chus iii to confront each other after 200. of the three eastern powers, that of ptolemaic egypt was the earliest to emerge. alexander’s general ptolemy ruled initially as governor after alex- ander’s death, but afterwards as king (304–281). Just three further ptol- emies spanned the rest of the century down to 204, giving an impression of great stability, whose underlying fragility was exposed only in the late years of ptolemy iv.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander the Great and the Hellenistic Age
    Macquarie University Department of Ancient History 2nd Semester, 2011. AHIS 241 / 341 AlexanderAlexander thethe GreatGreat andand thethe HellenisticHellenistic AgeAge Unit Outline, Schedule, Tutorial Materials and Bibliography 1 Contents: Unit Introduction and Requirements p. 3 Unit Schedule: Lecture and Tutorial topics p. 9 Map 1: Alexander's March of Conquest. p. 11 Weekly Tutorial Materials p. 12 Map 2: Alexander's Successors, 303 B.C. p. 17 Map 3: The 3rd Century World of Alexander’s Successors p. 18 Map 4: The Background to the Maccabean Revolt p. 27 Unit Main Bibliography p. 32 2 Macquarie University Department of Ancient History 2011 AHIS 241 / 341: Alexander the Great and the Hellenistic Age. UNIT INTRODUCTION This Unit on Alexander the Great and the ‘Hellenistic Age’ will begin with the political situation in Fourth Century Greece and the rise of Macedon. It will focus first on the career of Alexander the Great, and the interpretation of a number of key episodes in his life. The aim will be to build up an overall picture of his motives and achievements, and the consequences of his extraordinary conquests for later history. The focus will then turn to the break up of his ‘Empire’ at his death, and the warfare among his successors which led to the creation of the great rival kingdoms of the Hellenistic period. The Unit will be primarily a study in cultural history, set against the background of the political history of the Mediterranean world. It will not be tied to an event-by-event account of the post- Classical Greek world, but will focus also on the history of ideas and institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • India: the Ancient Past: a History of the Indian Sub-Continent from C. 7000 Bc to Ad 1200
    India: The Ancient Past ‘Burjor Avari’s balanced and well-researched book is a most reliable guide to the period of Indian history that it covers. It displays consider- able mastery of primary and secondary literature and distils it into a wonderfully lucid exposition. This book should be of interest to both lay readers and academic experts.’ Lord Bhikhu Parekh, University of Westminster A clear and systematic introduction to the rich story of the Indian past from early pre-history up until the beginning of the second millennium, this survey provides a fascinating account of the early development of Indian culture and civilisation. The study covers topics such as the Harappan Civilisation, the rise of Hindu culture, the influx of Islam from the eighth to the twelfth century, and key empires, states and dynasties. Through such topics and their histori ographies, the book engages with methodological and controversial issues. Features of this richly illustrated guide also include a range of maps to illustrate different time periods and geographical regions. Selected source extracts for review and reflection can be found at the end of every chapter, together with questions for discussion. India: The Ancient Past provides comprehensive coverage of the political, spiritual, cultural and geographical history of India in a uniquely accessible manner that will appeal both to students and to those with a general interest in Indian history. Burjor Avari was born in India in 1938, spent his childhood in Kenya and Zanzibar, graduated in history at Manchester University and was trained as a teacher at the Oxford University Institute of Education.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridging the Hellespont: the Successor Lysimachus - a Study
    BRIDGING THE HELLESPONT: THE SUCCESSOR LYSIMACHUS - A STUDY IN EARLY HELLENISTIC KINGSHIP Helen Sarah Lund PhD University College, London ProQuest Number: 10610063 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10610063 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 ABSTRACT Literary evidence on Lysimachus reveals a series of images which may say more about contemporary or later views on kingship than about the actual man, given the intrusion of bias, conventional motifs and propaganda. Thrace was Lysimachus* legacy from Alexander's empire; though problems posed by its formidable tribes and limited resources excluded him from the Successors' wars for nearly ten years, its position, linking Europe and Asia, afforded him some influence, Lysimachus failed to conquer "all of Thrace", but his settlements there achieved enough stability to allow him thoughts of rule across the Hellespont, in Asia Minor, More ambitious and less cautious than is often thought, Lysimachus' acquisition of empire in Asia Minor, Macedon and Greece from c.315 BC to 284 BC reflects considerable military and diplomatic skills, deployed primarily when self-interest demanded rather than reflecting obligations as a permanent member of an "anti-Antigonid team".
    [Show full text]