DOCSLIB.ORG

Περίληψη : King of Thrace (Ca

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Περίληψη : King of Thrace (Ca IΔΡΥΜA ΜΕΙΖΟΝΟΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ Συγγραφή : Δημητριάδου Δάφνη Μετάφραση : Νάκας Ιωάννης (19/5/2008) Για παραπομπή : Δημητριάδου Δάφνη , "Lysimachus", 2008, Εγκυκλοπαίδεια Μείζονος Ελληνισμού, Κωνσταντινούπολη URL: <http://www.ehw.gr/l.aspx?id=10251> Περίληψη : King of Thrace (ca. 323-281 BC), one of Alexander the Great's successors. He took control of Thrace and gradually extended his dominion to the Hellespont, Macedonia and Asia Minor. He was considered to be capable, but ruthless and not a particularly amiable ruler. He supported the creation and the development of urban centres mainly in Asia Minor. His decision to execute his son Agathocles caused riots in cities of Asia Minor and the intervention of Seleucus I Nikator. Τόπος και Χρόνος Γέννησης Between 361 and 351 BC - Macedonia Τόπος και Χρόνος Θανάτου February 281 BC - Korypedion (Kouropedion) Κύρια Ιδιότητα King 1. Biography Lysimachus, son of Agathocles, was born in Macedonia, but his origin was from an aristocratic family of Thessaly. His father was a close friend of Phillip II, whereas he had become a citizen of Pella and belonged to the bodyguards of Alexander III the Great.1 Lysimachus took four wives. Around 320 BC he married Nicaea, daughter of Antipatros and widow of Perdiccas. They had three or four children: his beloved son Agathocles, Arsinoe I, Eurydice and most probably another daughter. In 311 BC he asked for the hand of Cleopatra, sister of Alexander the Great, who, however, refused. In 302 BC he married Amastrida from Herakleia of Pontus, daughter of Oxyartes, niece of Darius and ex wife of Crateros, with which he did not have any offspring.2 Not many things are known about Lysimachus’third wedding apart from the fact that his wife was from Odrysia and that they had a son, Alexander. Around 299 BC he divorced Amastrida and married Arsinoe II Philadelphos, daughter of Ptolemy I and his second wife Berenice and sister of Ptolemy II Philadephos, with which he had three sons.3 2. Establishment of Lysimachus After the death of Alexander in 323 BC Lysimachus was given the supervision of Thrace. When the First War of the Successors broke out two years later, he took the side of Antipatros, Crateros and Antigonus I One-Eyed against Perdikkas and Eumenes. The assassination of Perdikkas, the death of Crateros and the successful efforts of Eumenes led to a compromised control over the unpleasant situation created in Alexander’s empire. The agreement between the Successors was signed in Triparadeisos of Northern Syria in 321/320 BC and resulted in strengthening the position of Antipatros, as well as the position of Antigonus. Lysimachus improved further his relations with Antipatros by taking his daughter Nicaea as a wife.4 After the victory of Antigonus I against Eumenes, which marked his control over Asia, the Second War of the Successors broke out. In 315 BC Lysimachus along with Cassander and Ptolemy I turned against Antigonus to stop his expansion towards Macedonia. The war lasted until 311 BC, when Antigonus signed a peace treaty keeping his rights over Asia Minor.5 In 305/304 BC Lysimachus, following the example of Antigonus, Ptolemy, Cassandros and Seleucus, adopted the title of “basileus”( king).6 The war which had started between Antigonus and the rest of the Successors ended in 301 BC with the battle of Ipsus in Phrygia, where Antigonus was defeated and lost his life. During the redistribution of the dominions of Alexander’s empire Lysimachus was mostly favoured, adding to his dominion the regions Antigonus once held in Asia Minor until the mountains of Taurus.7 Δημιουργήθηκε στις 25/9/2021 Σελίδα 1/7 IΔΡΥΜA ΜΕΙΖΟΝΟΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ Συγγραφή : Δημητριάδου Δάφνη Μετάφραση : Νάκας Ιωάννης (19/5/2008) Για παραπομπή : Δημητριάδου Δάφνη , "Lysimachus", 2008, Εγκυκλοπαίδεια Μείζονος Ελληνισμού, Κωνσταντινούπολη URL: <http://www.ehw.gr/l.aspx?id=10251> In 297 BC, after Cassandros’death, conflicts broke out in Macedonia between his sons for the succession to the throne. This gave Lysimachus, Demetrius I Poliorcetes, son of Antigonus, and to Pyrrhus of Epirus the opportunity to engage and face each other for the conquest of the kingdom. Lysimachus offered shelter to Cassandros’son Antipatros I, when he was exiled by Pyrrhus and probably then he gave him as a wife his daughter Eurydice. Some time later, however, he murdered him and also imprisoned his own daughter.8 During this entire period (297-288 BC) he was in constant conflict with Demetrios, who, having obtained the throne of Macedonia, was trying to take advantage of the difficulties Lysimachus had with the Getes of Dromichetes and to invade Thrace.9 Lysimachus reacted by allying with Pyrrhus and both invaded Macedonia and drove Demetrios out, who, however, managed to escape and started gathering military forces to invade Asia Minor. Lysimachus then made an alliance with Seleucus, Pyrrhus and Ptolemy I to stop him. Demetrios passed to Asia Minor, but was defeated by Lysimachus’son Agathocles, in 286 BC, and sought refuge to the regions of Seleucus, where he was imprisoned. In 285/284 BC Lysimachus on his part drove Pyrrhus out of Macedonia and extended his kingdom up to Thessaly.10 3. Lysimachus’end In approximately forty years and without any special achievements, at least before Ipsus, Lysimachus systematically established his power initially over Thrace and then over Phrygia on the Hellespont, Macedonia and the entire Asia Minor. In 309 BC he founded the capital of his state, Lysimacheia on the European side of the Hellespont. In 286 BC he was at the peak of his power. The tension between him and Seleucus, already existing since the years after Ipsus, became more intense. The latter did not hesitate to take advantage of an internal quarrel of the house of Lysimachus and the consequences it had to the cities of Asia Minor and invaded the region. More specifically, in 283/282 BC Lysimachus suspected his son Agathocles for a conspiracy against him, condemned and executed him. According to sources, Agathocles was the victim of a plot of Lysimachus’wife Arsinoe II; it is assumed that she was afraid for her life and for the fortune of her children when the time of succession would come. Agathocles’wife Lyssandra, daughter of Ptolemy I from his first wife Eurydice, sought refuge to Seleucus I Nikator asking for revenge. Some cities of Asia Minor who were friendly towards Agathocles, like Pergamon, mutinied and turned to Seleucus asking for his intervention. The two men confronted each other at Korypedion, in Western Asia Minor, in 281 BC. In the battle which took place Lysimachus was killed. His body was transported to Thrace and he was buried near Lysimacheia.11 4. Numismatic policy Lysimachus apparently did not mint any coins before the battle of Ipsus, apart from a series of tetrovola (four obols), which was minted in Lysimacheia. After the annexation of Asia Minor he continued minting drachmas with the types and the name of Alexander III in Lysimacheia, Lampsacus, Abydus, Teos, Colophon and Magnesia. Around 299-296 BC the same cities started minting drachmas with the royal title of Lysimachus (ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΣ ΛΥΣΙΜΑΧΟΥ). In 297/296 BC he introduced new coins of the Athenian measuring regulation, the so-called “lysimachoi”. Their obverse bears the head of the deified Alexander and their reverseAthena as Victory. In contrast to Demetrios I and Ptolemy I, Lysimachus avoided putting his portrait on his coins; he, however, maintained his name and title on the reverse. These coins were minted in many cities of his dominion, such as Lysimacheia, Lampsakos, Abydus, Sardeis and Colophon. To these Ephesus and Miletus were added after 294 BC, Amphipolis in 288 BC, Smyrna in 287 BC and Pella in 285 BC.12 Lysimachus’death at Korypedion did not stop the production of coins with his types and name. The lysimachoi were minted during the entire 3rd century BC from various mints, with that of Byzantium being the most important one. They were so popular, as the post-mortem mints of Alexander, a coin politically neutral and acceptable to the entire Hellenistic world.13 5. The cities of Asia Minor Δημιουργήθηκε στις 25/9/2021 Σελίδα 2/7 IΔΡΥΜA ΜΕΙΖΟΝΟΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ Συγγραφή : Δημητριάδου Δάφνη Μετάφραση : Νάκας Ιωάννης (19/5/2008) Για παραπομπή : Δημητριάδου Δάφνη , "Lysimachus", 2008, Εγκυκλοπαίδεια Μείζονος Ελληνισμού, Κωνσταντινούπολη URL: <http://www.ehw.gr/l.aspx?id=10251> The general attitude of Lysimachus towards the cities of Asia Minor does not present any novelty. He basically adopted the policy of Cassandros and of Antigonus I. There are no clear indications that he was any stricter than Antigonus I or Demetrius I. Cities were practically subjects and not allies of every ruler. Lysimachus controlled the Ionian League through one of his generals. He imposed taxes to every productive activity and supported tyrannical regimes in Samos, Herakleia of Pontus and maybe in Priene, Ilion and Nisyros.14 Lysimachus continued building, and in some cases completed, settlements which were started by Antigonus I, like in Smyrna, where he moved the inhabitants of the surrounding settlements to the urban centre founding New Smyrna.15 A characteristic of his policy was the change of the name of cities. Thus, he changed the name of Antigoneia Bithyniake to Nicaea, of Ephesus to Arsinoeia and of Smyrna to Eurydiceia. The new names in the last two cases did not live after his death. Nicaea, however, kept her new name and developed into an important centre of the Hellenistic and Roman world. Lysimachus did not found important cities with the exception of his capital Lysimacheia in Thrace. The foundation of this city resulted in turning the city of Kardia, the inhabitants of which he moved to Lysimacheia, into a village.16 6.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CILICIA: the FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCHES in ANATOLIA1 Mark Wilson
    CILICIA: THE FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCHES IN ANATOLIA1 Mark Wilson Summary This article explores the origin of the Christian church in Anatolia. While individual believers undoubtedly entered Anatolia during the 30s after the day of Pentecost (Acts 2:9–10), the book of Acts suggests that it was not until the following decade that the first church was organized. For it was at Antioch, the capital of the Roman province of Syria, that the first Christians appeared (Acts 11:20–26). Yet two obscure references in Acts point to the organization of churches in Cilicia at an earlier date. Among the addressees of the letter drafted by the Jerusalem council were the churches in Cilicia (Acts 15:23). Later Paul visited these same churches at the beginning of his second ministry journey (Acts 15:41). Paul’s relationship to these churches points to this apostle as their founder. Since his home was the Cilician city of Tarsus, to which he returned after his conversion (Gal. 1:21; Acts 9:30), Paul was apparently active in church planting during his so-called ‘silent years’. The core of these churches undoubtedly consisted of Diaspora Jews who, like Paul’s family, lived in the region. Jews from Cilicia were members of a Synagogue of the Freedmen in Jerusalem, to which Paul was associated during his time in Jerusalem (Acts 6:9). Antiochus IV (175–164 BC) hellenized and urbanized Cilicia during his reign; the Romans around 39 BC added Cilicia Pedias to the province of Syria. Four cities along with Tarsus, located along or near the Pilgrim Road that transects Anatolia, constitute the most likely sites for the Cilician churches.
    [Show full text]
  • VU Research Portal
    VU Research Portal The impact of empire on market prices in Babylon Pirngruber, R. 2012 document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in VU Research Portal citation for published version (APA) Pirngruber, R. (2012). The impact of empire on market prices in Babylon: in the Late Achaemenid and Seleucid periods, ca. 400 - 140 B.C. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. E-mail address: [email protected] Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 THE IMPACT OF EMPIRE ON MARKET PRICES IN BABYLON in the Late Achaemenid and Seleucid periods, ca. 400 – 140 B.C. R. Pirngruber VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT THE IMPACT OF EMPIRE ON MARKET PRICES IN BABYLON in the Late Achaemenid and Seleucid periods, ca. 400 – 140 B.C. ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad Doctor aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, op gezag van de rector magnificus prof.dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Iraq
    Republic of Iraq Babylon Nomination Dossier for Inscription of the Property on the World Heritage List January 2018 stnel oC fobalbaT Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 State Party .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Province ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 Name of property ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Geographical coordinates to the nearest second ................................................................................................. 1 Center ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 N 32° 32’ 31.09”, E 44° 25’ 15.00” ..................................................................................................................... 1 Textural description of the boundary .................................................................................................................. 1 Criteria under which the property is nominated .................................................................................................. 4 Draft statement
    [Show full text]
  • Keltoi and Hellenes: a Study of the Celts in the Hellenistic World
    KELTOI AND THE HELLENES A STUDY OF THE CELTS IN THE HELLENISTIC WoRU) PATRICK EGAN In the third century B.C. a large body ofCeltic tribes thrust themselves violently into the turbulent world of the Diadochoi,’ immediately instilling fear, engendering anger and finally, commanding respect from the peoples with whom they came into contact. Their warlike nature, extreme hubris and vigorous energy resembled Greece’s own Homeric past, but represented a culture, language and way of life totally alien to that of the Greeks and Macedonians in this period. In the years that followed, the Celts would go on to ravage Macedonia, sack Delphi, settle their own “kingdom” and ifil the ranks of the Successors’ armies. They would leave indelible marks on the Hellenistic World, first as plundering barbaroi and finally, as adapted, integral elements and members ofthe greatermulti-ethnic society that was taking shape around them. This paper will explore the roles played by the Celts by examining their infamous incursions into Macedonia and Greece, their phase of settlement and occupation ofwhat was to be called Galatia, their role as mercenaries, and finally their transition and adaptation, most noticeably on the individual level, to the demands of the world around them. This paper will also seek to challenge some of the traditionally hostile views held by Greek historians regarding the role, achievements, and the place the Celts occupied as members, not simply predators, of the Hellenistic World.2 19 THE DAWN OF THE CELTS IN THE HELLENISTIC WORLD The Celts were not unknown to all Greeks in the years preceding the Deiphic incursion of February, 279.
    [Show full text]
  • Demetrius Poliorcetes and the Hellenic League
    DEMETRIUSPOLIORCETES AND THE HELLENIC LEAGUE (PLATE 33) 1. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND D JURING the six years, 307/6-302/1 B.C., issues were raised and settled which shaped the course of western history for a long time to come. The epoch was alike critical for Athens, Hellas, and the Macedonians. The Macedonians faced squarely during this period the decision whether their world was to be one world or an aggregate of separate kingdoms with conflicting interests, and ill-defined boundaries, preserved by a precarious balance of power and incapable of common action against uprisings of Greek and oriental subjects and the plundering appetites of surrounding barbarians. The champion of unity was King Antigonus the One- Eyed, and his chief lieutenant his brilliant but unstatesmanlike son, King Demetrius the Taker of Cities, a master of siege operations and of naval construction and tactics, more skilled in organizing the land-instruments of warfare than in using them on the battle field. The final campaign between the champions of Macedonian unity and disunity opened in 307 with the liberation of Athens by Demetrius and ended in 301 B.C. with the Battle of the Kings, when Antigonus died in a hail of javelins and Demetrius' cavalry failed to penetrate a corps of 500 Indian elephants in a vain effort to rescue hinm. Of his four adversaries King Lysimachus and King Kassander left no successors; the other two, Kings Ptolemy of Egypt and Seleucus of Syria, were more fortunate, and they and Demetrius' able son, Antigonus Gonatas, planted the three dynasties with whom the Romans dealt and whom they successively destroyed in wars spread over 44 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology and History of Lydia from the Early Lydian Period to Late Antiquity (8Th Century B.C.-6Th Century A.D.)
    Dokuz Eylül University – DEU The Research Center for the Archaeology of Western Anatolia – EKVAM Colloquia Anatolica et Aegaea Congressus internationales Smyrnenses IX Archaeology and history of Lydia from the early Lydian period to late antiquity (8th century B.C.-6th century A.D.). An international symposium May 17-18, 2017 / Izmir, Turkey ABSTRACTS Edited by Ergün Laflı Gülseren Kan Şahin Last Update: 21/04/2017. Izmir, May 2017 Websites: https://independent.academia.edu/TheLydiaSymposium https://www.researchgate.net/profile/The_Lydia_Symposium 1 This symposium has been dedicated to Roberto Gusmani (1935-2009) and Peter Herrmann (1927-2002) due to their pioneering works on the archaeology and history of ancient Lydia. Fig. 1: Map of Lydia and neighbouring areas in western Asia Minor (S. Patacı, 2017). 2 Table of contents Ergün Laflı, An introduction to Lydian studies: Editorial remarks to the abstract booklet of the Lydia Symposium....................................................................................................................................................8-9. Nihal Akıllı, Protohistorical excavations at Hastane Höyük in Akhisar………………………………10. Sedat Akkurnaz, New examples of Archaic architectural terracottas from Lydia………………………..11. Gülseren Alkış Yazıcı, Some remarks on the ancient religions of Lydia……………………………….12. Elif Alten, Revolt of Achaeus against Antiochus III the Great and the siege of Sardis, based on classical textual, epigraphic and numismatic evidence………………………………………………………………....13. Gaetano Arena, Heleis: A chief doctor in Roman Lydia…….……………………………………....14. Ilias N. Arnaoutoglou, Κοινὸν, συμβίωσις: Associations in Hellenistic and Roman Lydia……….……..15. Eirini Artemi, The role of Ephesus in the late antiquity from the period of Diocletian to A.D. 449, the “Robber Synod”.……………………………………………………………………….………...16. Natalia S. Astashova, Anatolian pottery from Panticapaeum…………………………………….17-18. Ayşegül Aykurt, Minoan presence in western Anatolia……………………………………………...19.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ptolemies: an Unloved and Unknown Dynasty. Contributions to a Different Perspective and Approach
    THE PTOLEMIES: AN UNLOVED AND UNKNOWN DYNASTY. CONTRIBUTIONS TO A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE AND APPROACH JOSÉ DAS CANDEIAS SALES Universidade Aberta. Centro de História (University of Lisbon). Abstract: The fifteen Ptolemies that sat on the throne of Egypt between 305 B.C. (the date of assumption of basileia by Ptolemy I) and 30 B.C. (death of Cleopatra VII) are in most cases little known and, even in its most recognised bibliography, their work has been somewhat overlooked, unappreciated. Although boisterous and sometimes unloved, with the tumultuous and dissolute lives, their unbridled and unrepressed ambitions, the intrigues, the betrayals, the fratricides and the crimes that the members of this dynasty encouraged and practiced, the Ptolemies changed the Egyptian life in some aspects and were responsible for the last Pharaonic monuments which were left us, some of them still considered true masterpieces of Egyptian greatness. The Ptolemaic Period was indeed a paradoxical moment in the History of ancient Egypt, as it was with a genetically foreign dynasty (traditions, language, religion and culture) that the country, with its capital in Alexandria, met a considerable economic prosperity, a significant political and military power and an intense intellectual activity, and finally became part of the world and Mediterranean culture. The fifteen Ptolemies that succeeded to the throne of Egypt between 305 B.C. (date of assumption of basileia by Ptolemy I) and 30 B.C. (death of Cleopatra VII), after Alexander’s death and the division of his empire, are, in most cases, very poorly understood by the public and even in the literature on the topic.
    [Show full text]
  • The Coins from the Necropolis "Metlata" Near the Village of Rupite
    margarita ANDONOVA the coins from the necropolis "metlata" near the village of rupite... THE COINS FROM THE NECROPOLIS METLATA NEAR THE VILLAGE "OF RUPITE" (F. MULETAROVO), MUNICIPALITY OF PETRICH by Margarita ANDONOVA, Regional Museum of History– Blagoevgrad This article sets to describe and introduce known as Charon's fee was registered through the in scholarly debate the numismatic data findspots of the coins on the skeleton; specifically, generated during the 1985-1988 archaeological these coins were found near the head, the pelvis, excavations at one of the necropoleis situated in the left arm and the legs. In cremations in situ, the locality "Metlata" near the village of Rupite. coins were placed either inside the grave or in The necropolis belongs to the long-known urns made of stone or clay, as well as in bowls "urban settlement" situated on the southern placed next to them. It is noteworthy that out of slopes of Kozhuh hill, at the confluence of 167 graves, coins were registered only in 52, thus the Strumeshnitsa and Struma Rivers, and accounting for less than 50%. The absence of now identified with Heraclea Sintica. The coins in some graves can probably be attributed archaeological excavations were conducted by to the fact that "in Greek society, there was no Yulia Bozhinova from the Regional Museum of established dogma about the way in which the History, Blagoevgrad. souls of the dead travelled to the realm of Hades" The graves number 167 and are located (Зубарь 1982, 108). According to written sources, within an area of ​​750 m². Coins were found mainly Euripides, it is clear that the deceased in 52 graves, both Hellenistic and Roman, may be accompanied to the underworld not only and 10 coins originate from areas (squares) by Charon, but also by Hermes or Thanatos.
    [Show full text]
  • Περίληψη : Antigonus Monophthalmus (382-301 BC) Was a General of Alexander the Great, the Most Important of the Successors and Founder of the Antigonid Dynasty
    IΔΡΥΜA ΜΕΙΖΟΝΟΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ Συγγραφή : Παναγοπούλου Κατερίνα Μετάφραση : Καλογεροπούλου Γεωργία , Καριώρης Παναγιώτης Για παραπομπή : Παναγοπούλου Κατερίνα , "Antigonus I Monophthalmus (One- Eyed)", Εγκυκλοπαίδεια Μείζονος Ελληνισμού, Μ. Ασία URL: <http://www.ehw.gr/l.aspx?id=7285> Περίληψη : Antigonus Monophthalmus (382-301 BC) was a general of Alexander the Great, the most important of the successors and founder of the Antigonid dynasty. He was the governor of Phrygia and possibly Lydia in Asia Minor. He was appointed ruler of Asia Minor for a short period of time (311 BC) and he was the first of the Diadochoi to assume the royal title along with his son Demetrius I (306 BC). He was killed in the Battle of Ipsus in 301 BC. Τόπος και Χρόνος Γέννησης 382 BC, Macedonia Τόπος και Χρόνος Θανάτου 301 BC, Ipsus Κύρια Ιδιότητα General of Alexander the Great, King 1. Family-Education-Early Years Contemporary to the Macedonian kings Phillip II (359-336 BC) and Alexander the Great (336-323 BC), like all the Diadochoi, Antigonus Monophtphalmus was born in 382 BC and lost his life in the Battle of Ipsus in 301 BC.1 His father was called Philip2 and he had three brothers, but only the names of the two are known (Demetrius, Ptolemy).3 His family belonged to the Macedonian aristocracy and he was raised in the wider area of Pella, the capital of Macedonia.4 Hence, he was very well educated and had studied Euripides, Homer, tragic and lyric poetry, rhetoric and philosophy.5 His father lost his life during the defeat of the Macedonian army by the Illyrian invaders, which left Macedonia without a king in 359 BC.
    [Show full text]
  • Queen Arsinoë II, the Maritime Aphrodite and Early Ptolemaic Ruler Cult
    ΑΡΣΙΝΟΗ ΕΥΠΛΟΙΑ Queen Arsinoë II, the Maritime Aphrodite and Early Ptolemaic Ruler Cult Carlos Francis Robinson Bachelor of Arts (Hons. 1) A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2019 Historical and Philosophical Inquiry Abstract Queen Arsinoë II, the Maritime Aphrodite and Early Ptolemaic Ruler Cult By the early Hellenistic period a trend was emerging in which royal women were deified as Aphrodite. In a unique innovation, Queen Arsinoë II of Egypt (c. 316 – 270 BC) was deified as the maritime Aphrodite, and was associated with the cult titles Euploia, Akraia, and Galenaië. It was the important study of Robert (1966) which identified that the poets Posidippus and Callimachus were honouring Arsinoë II as the maritime Aphrodite. This thesis examines how this new third-century BC cult of ‘Arsinoë Aphrodite’ adopted aspects of Greek cults of the maritime Aphrodite, creating a new derivative cult. The main historical sources for this cult are the epigrams of Posidippus and Callimachus, including a relatively new epigram (Posidippus AB 39) published in 2001. This thesis demonstrates that the new cult of Arsinoë Aphrodite utilised existing traditions, such as: Aphrodite’s role as patron of fleets, the practice of dedications to Aphrodite by admirals, the use of invocations before sailing, and the practice of marine dedications such as shells. In this way the Ptolemies incorporated existing religious traditions into a new form of ruler cult. This study is the first attempt to trace the direct relationship between Ptolemaic ruler cult and existing traditions of the maritime Aphrodite, and deepens our understanding of the strategies of ruler cult adopted in the early Hellenistic period.
    [Show full text]
  • The City of Thessalonica (Adapted from Thomas Constable in “The Bible Knowledge Commentary”)
    The City of Thessalonica (Adapted from Thomas Constable in “The Bible Knowledge Commentary”) The city of Thessalonica flourished for hundreds of years, partly because of its ideal location. It was situated on the banks of a hospitable harbor in the Thermaic Gulf near the northwest corner of the Aegean Sea. In the Apostle Paul’s day it was the chief seaport of the Roman province of Macedonia. Thessalonica ranked with Corinth and Ephesus, the main ports of the provinces of Achaia and Asia, as a great shipping center. Thessalonica also enjoyed another advantage. The Egnatian Way, the main Roman road from Rome to the Orient via Byzantium (modern Istanbul), passed through the city. This put Thessalonica in direct contact with many other important cities by land as well as by sea. It was one of the most important centers of population in Paul’s day, occupying a strategic location both governmentally and militarily. Estimates of the population of Thessalonica in New Testament times place it at near 200,000. Most of the inhabitants were native Greeks, but many Romans also lived there. Asians and Jews likewise populated the city. Wherever commerce flourished in the ancient world one would find Jewish businessmen. The Jewish synagogue in Thessalonica was influential; many Greek proselytes were present when Paul preached there. First Thessalonians reflects the moral climate of the city. The pagan Greek religion of the largest segment of the population produced many forms of immorality but whetted the appetites of some for spiritual reality. Evidently the higher standards of Judaism attracted disillusioned Greeks, Romans, and Asians to the synagogue.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Roman Events
    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
    [Show full text]