DOCSLIB.ORG

Stage 1 Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stage 1 Report STAGE 1 REPORT Rend Lake Watershed TMDL Final Stage 1 Report Prepared for Illinois EPA June 2014 Table of Contents Section 1 Goals and Objectives for the Rend Lake Watershed 1.1 Total Maximum Daily Load Overview ..................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 TMDL Goals and Objectives for the Rend Lake Watershed ............................................................ 1-2 1.3 Report Overview .............................................................................................................................................. 1-4 Section 2 Rend Lake Watershed Description 2.1 Rend Lake Watershed Location ................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Topography ........................................................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.3 Land Use ............................................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3.1 Subbasin Land Use ....................................................................................................................... 2-2 2.4 Soils ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2-6 2.4.1 Rend Lake Watershed Soil Characteristics ....................................................................... 2-6 2.5 Population ........................................................................................................................................................... 2-7 2.6 Climate, Pan Evaporation, and Streamflow .......................................................................................... 2-8 2.6.1 Climate .............................................................................................................................................. 2-8 2.6.2 Pan Evaporation............................................................................................................................ 2-8 2.6.3 Streamflow ...................................................................................................................................... 2-9 Section 3 Rend Lake Watershed Public Participation 3.1 Rend Lake Watershed Public Participation and Involvement ...................................................... 3-1 Section 4 Rend Lake Watershed Water Quality Standards 4.1 Illinois Water Quality Standards ............................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Designated Uses ................................................................................................................................................ 4-1 4.2.1 General Use ..................................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2.2 Public and Food Processing Water Supplies .................................................................... 4-1 4.3 Illinois Water Quality Standards ............................................................................................................... 4-2 4.4 Potential Pollutant Sources.......................................................................................................................... 4-3 Section 5 Rend Lake Watershed Characterization 5.1 Water Quality Data .......................................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1.1 Stream Water Quality Data ...................................................................................................... 5-2 5.1.1.1 Dissolved Oxygen ..................................................................................................... 5-2 5.1.1.2 Fecal Coliform ............................................................................................................ 5-3 5.1.1.3 pH .................................................................................................................................... 5-3 5.1.1.4 Metals ............................................................................................................................ 5-4 5.1.2 Lake Water Quality Data ........................................................................................................... 5-5 5.1.2.1 Rend Lake .................................................................................................................... 5-5 5.1.2.1.1 Total Phosphorus in Rend Lake ................................................ 5-6 5.1.2.1.2 Manganese in Rend Lake .............................................................. 5-7 5.1.2.2 Benton Reservoir ...................................................................................................... 5-8 5.1.2.2.1 Total Phosphorus in Benton Reservoir .................................. 5-9 5.1.2.3 Ashley Reservoir .................................................................................................... 5-10 5.1.2.3.1 Total Phosphorus in Ashley Reservoir ................................ 5-11 i Contents 5.1.2.3.2 Dissolved Oxygen in Ashley Reservoir ................................ 5-12 5.1.2.4 Lake Jaycee ............................................................................................................... 5-12 5.1.2.4.1 Total Phosphorus in Lake Jaycee ........................................... 5-13 5.2 Reservoir Characteristics ........................................................................................................................... 5-14 5.2.1 Rend Lake ...................................................................................................................................... 5-14 5.2.2 Benton Reservoir ....................................................................................................................... 5-15 5.2.3 Ashley Reservoir ........................................................................................................................ 5-15 5.2.4 Lake Jaycee ................................................................................................................................... 5-15 5.3 Point Sources ................................................................................................................................................... 5-16 5.4 Nonpoint Sources .......................................................................................................................................... 5-17 5.4.1 Crop Information ....................................................................................................................... 5-17 5.4.2 Animal Operations .................................................................................................................... 5-18 5.4.3 Septic Systems ............................................................................................................................. 5-19 5.5 Watershed Studies and Other Watershed Information ................................................................ 5-19 Section 6 Approach to Developing TMDL and Identification of Data Needs 6.1 Simple and Detailed Approaches for Developing TMDLs .............................................................. 6-1 6.2 Additional Data Needs for TMDL Development in the Rend Lake Watershed ..................... 6-2 6.3 Approaches for Developing TMDLs for Stream Segments in Rend Lake Watershed ......... 6-3 6.3.1 Recommended Approach for Metals and Fecal Coliform TMDLs for Stream Segments ............................................................................................................. 6-3 6.3.2 Recommended Approach for pH TMDL in Big Muddy River Segment N-08 .................................................................................................................... 6-4 6.3.3 Recommended Approach for DO TMDLs in Impaired Stream Segments ............................................................................................................................. 6-4 6.4 Approaches for Developing TMDLs for Lake Segments in the Rend Lake Watershed ...... 6-4 6.4.1 Recommended Approach for Total Phosphorus and DO TMDLs ................ 6-4 6.4.2 Recommended Approach for the Manganese TMDL in Rend Lake ............ 6-5 Appendices Appendix A – Land Use Categories Appendix B – Soil Characteristics Appendix C – Water Quality Data ii Contents List of Tables 1-1 Impaired Water Bodies in Rend Lake Watershed .............................................................................. 1-2 2-1 Land Cover and Land Use in Rend Lake Watershed ......................................................................... 2-2 2-2 Land Cover and Land Use in the Ashley Reservoir Subbasin ........................................................ 2-2 2-3 Land Cover and Land Use in the Lake Benton Subbasin ................................................................. 2-3 2-4 Land Cover and Land Use in the Lake Jaycees Subbasin ................................................................. 2-3 2-5 Land Cover and Land Use in the Snow Creek Subbasin................................................................... 2-4 2-6 Land Cover and Land Use in the Gun Creek Subbasin ...................................................................... 2-4 2-7 Land
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Management and Program Audit Rend Lake Conservancy District
    STATE OF ILLINOIS OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL MANAGEMENT AND PROGRAM AUDIT REND LAKE CONSERVANCY DISTRICT SEPTEMBER 2004 WILLIAM G. HOLLAND AUDITOR GENERAL SPRINGFIELD OFFICE: CHICAGO OFFICE: ILES PARK PLAZA MICHAEL A. BILANDIC BLDG. • SUITE S-900 740 EAST ASH • 62703-3154 160 NORTH LASALLE • 60601-3103 PHONE: 217/782-6046 PHONE: 312/814-4000 FAX: 217 /785-8222 • TTY: 888/261-2887 FAX: 312/814-4006 OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL WILLIAM G. HOLLAND To the Legislative Audit Commission, the Speaker and Minority Leader of the House of Representatives, the President and Minority Leader of the Senate, the members of the General Assembly, and the Governor: This is our report of the Management and Program Audit of the Rend Lake Conservancy District. The audit was conducted pursuant to Public Act 93-0275, which became effective July 22, 2003. The audit was conducted in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards and the audit standards promulgated by the Office of the Auditor General at 74 Ill. Adm. Code 420.310. The audit report is transmitted in conformance with Section 3-14 of the Illinois State Auditing Act. WILLIAM G. HOLLAND Auditor General Springfield, Illinois September 2004 INTERNET ADDRESS: [email protected] RECYCLED PAPER • SOYBEAN INKS REPORT DIGEST SYNOPSIS The management and program audit, and the financial audit, MANAGEMENT AND which were conducted pursuant to Public Act 93-0275, concluded that PROGRAM AUDIT the Rend Lake Conservancy District has significant deficiencies in virtually all aspects of its management, including: planning; water and FINANCIAL AUDIT sewage operations; personnel; contract management; property and For the Year Ended: equipment management; performance monitoring; and internal controls.
    [Show full text]
  • Perry County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan
    Perry County, Illinois Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan A 2015 Update of the 2009 Countywide MHMP Perry County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Perry County, Illinois Adoption Date: -- _______________________ -- Primary Point of Contact Secondary Point of Contact David H. Searby, Jr. Raymond D. Clark EMA Coordinator ESDA Coordinator Perry County Emergency Management Agency Du Quoin ESDA Perry County Courthouse – Room #15 P.O. Box Pinckneyville, IL 62274 Du Quoin, IL 62832 Phone: (618) 357-6221 Phone: (618) 542-3841 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Perry County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Acknowledgements The Perry County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan would not have been possible without the incredible feedback, input, and expertise provided by the County leadership, citizens, staff, federal and state agencies, and volunteers. We would like to give special thank you to the citizens not mentioned below who freely gave their time and input in hopes of building a stronger, more progressive County. Perry County gratefully acknowledges the following people for the time, energy and resources given to create the Perry County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan. Perry County Board of Commissioners Robert D. Kelly, Chairman Sam Robb James Epplin 2014 Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Steering Committee David Searby, EMA Coordinator, Perry County Emergency Management Agency Raymond Clark, ESDA Coordinator, Du Quoin Emergency Services and Disaster Agency Joyce Rheal, EMA Staff, Perry County Emergency Management Agency Shane Malawy, Administrator, Pinckneyville Ambulance Service Steve Behm, Lieutenant, Perry County Sheriff Bruce Reppert, EMA Staff, Perry County Emergency Management Agency Sandra Webster, Director, American Red Cross Little Egypt Network James Gielow, Chief, Pinckneyville Fire Department / Pinckneyville Rural Fire Protection District Krista Mulholland, Perry County Health Department ii Perry County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents Section 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Muddy River Bottoms Habitat Improvement
    Environmental Assessment BIG MUDDY RIVER BOTTOMS HABITAT IMPROVEMENT United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service April 2005 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. For Information Contact: National Environmental Policy Act Coordinator The Shawnee National Forest 50 Hwy 145 South, Harrisburg, IL 62946 (618) 253-7114 This document can be accessed on the Shawnee National Forest website at www.fs.fed.us/r9/forests/shawnee. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SUMMARY…………………………………………………………….. ……. 4 II. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………… 5 Document Structure………………………………………………………………. 5 Purpose of and Need for Action………………………………………………….. 7 Proposed Action………………………………………………………………….. 8 Decision Framework……………………………………………………………… 8 Public Involvement……………………………………………………………….. 8 Issues and Scope of the Environmental Assessment………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Sugar Camp Energy, LLC Mine No. 1 Expansion - Revision 6 EIS
    Document Type: EIS-Administrative Record Index Field: Final EIS Project Name: Sugar Camp Mine No. 1 Project Number: 2019-28 SUGAR CAMP ENERGY, LLC MINE NUMBER 1 – BOUNDARY REVISION 6 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Franklin and Hamilton Counties, Illinois Lead Agency: TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Knoxville, Tennessee Cooperating Agency: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Chicago, Illinois October 2020 This page intentionally left blank COVER SHEET Sugar Camp Energy, LLC Mine No. 1 Expansion - Revision 6 EIS Proposed action: The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) proposes to authorize the mining of TVA-owned coal, currently leased to Sugar Camp Energy, LLC, underlying approximately 12,125 acres in southern Illinois. Associated actions include the planned subsidence of much of the mined area, the construction of five Bleeder Shaft Facilities, and the processing of the coal at an existing Coal Preparation Plant. Type of document: Final Environmental Impact Statement Lead agency: Tennessee Valley Authority Cooperating agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency To request information, contact: Elizabeth Smith Tennessee Valley Authority 400 West Summit Hill Drive, WT11B Knoxville, Tennessee 37902-1499 E-Mail: [email protected] Abstract: TVA evaluates a No Action and Action Alternative in this EIS. The Action Alternative consists of TVA approving the extraction of TVA-owned coal from an area of approximately 12,125 acres, the construction and operation of five Bleeder Shaft Facilities, and the planned subsidence of the ground surface above the extracted coal. Connected actions include processing, storing, and transporting the extracted coal via existing and proposed facilities. Under the No Action Alternative, TVA would not approve the extraction of the TVA-owned coal, and extracting, processing, storing, and transporting other coal in the area would continue.
    [Show full text]
  • A Floristic Study of a Southern Illinois Swampy Area
    No. 2 NEW SPECIES OF CTENICERA 89 A FLORISTIC STUDY OF A SOUTHERN ILLINOIS SWAMPY AREA ROBERT H. MOHLENBROCK Department of Botany, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois In the western part of Union County in southwestern Illinois is a unique area of swamps and woodlands of low ground. This paper is an endeavor to discuss floristic relationships of the species of vascular plants which occur in this area. These swamps of Union County occur in the following sections of T 11 S, R 3 W: 9, 16, 17, 21, 28, and 33. * A small portion of T 12 S, R 3 W, sections 3 and 4 is also included (fig. 1). Within this area, numerous habitat types are found. This study deals only with the floristics of the swamp-inhabiting plants. A high range of hills forms the eastern border of the swamp. At the western limits of these hills, massive limestone bluffs which once bordered the Mississippi River are exposed. These often nearly vertical bluffs are in places almost 350 feet high. They are dissected by numerous east-west ravines which are covered with dense vegetation. Hill prairies are located along the western-facing edges of many of these bluffs. These treeless areas are minute replicas of prairies to the west. The swamp vegetation is found in an area from one-eighth of a mile to nearly a mile wide and for a length of about six miles. The southern end of the area is occupied by a finger-shaped lake known as Wolf Lake. The lake extends for nearly two miles, becoming shallower at its northern end where it gives rise to a deep swamp.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: Affected Environment
    Chapter 3:Affected Environment Chapter 3: Affected Environment 3.1 Introduction Chapter 3 provides an overview of Crab Orchard National Wildlife Refuge and the resources it pro- vides in terms of habitat, wildlife and people. 3.2 Physical Environment 3.2.1 Physiography The physiography of the northern and southern portions of the Refuge is quite different. The terrain of the northern portion of the Refuge is character- ized by low relief, broad valleys, and relatively well- developed drainage systems while the southern por- tion of the Refuge is uplands with narrow ridges dis- sected by deep, narrow valleys with steep slopes and numerous sandstone outcrops. The northern portion of the Refuge is covered with a heterogeneous mixture of rock fragments ranging in size from clay to boulders deposited by glaciers on bedrock. Generally the slopes in the area are less than 3 percent. The southern portion of the Refuge is part of a continuous ridge extending from Prairie restoration, Crab Orchard NWR Battery Rock on the Ohio River to Horseshoe Bluff overlooking the Mississippi River. The hills are highly dissected uplands with little flat land and 3.2.2 Geology nearly all of the area has steep slopes, most in The bedrock underlying the Refuge is of Pennsyl- excess of 10 percent slope. vanian age. In the northern part of the Refuge, the The Refuge's elevation ranges from less than 380 bedrock is covered by a thin layer of glacial till of feet above mean sea level at Crab Orchard Creek in Illinoian age. During the Wisconsin glacial age, the Jackson County to over 740 feet at the southeast weathered Illinoian glacial till was covered by the corner of the Refuge in Union County.
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Prairies 101
    Illinois Department of Natural Resources Division of Education One Natural Resources Way Springfield, IL 62702 ENTICE – Environment and Nature Training Institute for Conservation Education Illinois Prairies 101 Part I Geology Many factors interact to determine the vegetation of any site, regardless of size. Bedrock geology, glacial history, soils, moisture, climate, grazing animals, and fire have combined to directly influence the distribution of prairies and forests within Illinois. With a different climate, glacial history or fire history, the vegetation of Illinois would have been vastly different from that observed and described by the French explorers when they arrived in the late 1600s. Some of these factors, such as bedrock, are largely obscured in Illinois by a thick layer of till deposited by the action of glaciers many thousands of years ago. The only places where bedrock is exposed are along the deeply incised valleys of the Illinois, Mississippi, Ohio and Wabash rivers and their tributaries, or along fault lines at various locations throughout the state. The bedrock of Illinois resulted from the deposition of marine organisms during the Paleozoic and Mesozoic eras in the period 65 to 570 million years ago. Bedrock from these two geologic time periods differs not just in age, but also in location and thickness. Paleozoic bedrock, the most widely distributed, is present throughout much of Illinois. Its maximum thickness is approximately 14,000 feet compared to the maximum thickness of only 500 feet for Mesozoic era bedrock present in southern Illinois. The most common and probably best-known type of bedrock in Illinois is limestone, a sedimentary rock formed at the bottom of ancient seas mostly by the deposition of shells, coral skeletons, and secretions from certain types of algae.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 11/Wednesday, January
    Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 16, 2008 / Rules and Regulations 2835 * Elevation in feet (NGVD) + Elevation in feet Flooding source(s) Location of referenced elevation (NAVD) Communities # Depth in feet affected above ground Modified At the intersection of Marlin Avenue and Southeast Dog- +125 wood Drive. * National Geodetic Vertical Datum. + North American Vertical Datum. # Depth in feet above ground. ADDRESSES City of Damascus Maps are available for inspection at Damascus City Hall, 19920 Highway 212, Damascus, OR 97089. City of Happy Valley Maps are available for inspection at Michael Walter Planning Services Manager, 12915 SE King Road, Happy Valley, OR 97086. City of Lake Oswego Maps are available for inspection at Rob D. Amsberry Surface Water Management, 380 A Avenue, Lake Oswego, OR 97034. City of Rivergrove Maps are available for inspection at Larry Barrett City Manager, 5311 Childs Road, Lake Oswego, OR 97035. City of West Linn Maps are available for inspection at City Hall, 22500 Salamo Road, West Linn, OR 97068. Clackamas County (Unincorporated Areas) Maps are available for inspection at Steve F. Hanschka Floodplain Administrator Sunnybrook Service Center, 9101 SE Sannybrook Boulevard, Clackamas, OR 97015. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. community. This date may be obtained communities listed below. Elevations at 97.022, ‘‘Flood Insurance.’’) by contacting the office where the maps selected locations in each community Dated: January 3, 2008. are available for inspection as indicated are shown. David I. Maurstad, on the table below. National Environmental Policy Act. Federal Insurance Administrator of the ADDRESSES: The final BFEs for each This final rule is categorically excluded National Flood Insurance Program, community are available for inspection from the requirements of 44 CFR part Department of Homeland Security, Federal at the office of the Chief Executive 10, Environmental Consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • Longwall MINING UNDER a PUBLIC LAKE and WILDLIFE REFUGE: PLANNING for SUBSIDENCE IMPACTS
    LoNGWALL MINING UNDER A PUBLIC LAKE AND WILDLIFE REFUGE: PLANNING FOR SUBSIDENCE IMPACTS by Daniel Barkley' Abstract: Rend Lake is a man-made water body in south central Illinois completed by the Corps of Engineers in 1972. Approximately 18,900 acres of water and 20,000 acres of managed land encompass the project. The lake serves as a significant public water supply for the region and also provides outdoor recreation opportunities such as camping, swimming, boating, fishing and hunting. Over the past two decades, several coal companies have conducted both high extraction retreat and longwall mining operations under and adjacent to Rend Lake. The resulting surface subsidence has altered shoreline locations and increased water depths. Mitigation of subsidence impacts has been achieved by a combination ofland acquisition to expand the project as well as site specific mitigation techniques to restore existing capabilities and uses. The last surviving company is currently conducting longwall operations under a State of Illinois managed wildlife refuge located on the Nason Point Peninsula. The longwall operations will inundate a portion of the peninsula's land surface and could potentially impact the existing habitats of the refuge. Issues at stake are potential impacts to shore birds and the migratory Canada goose. Several state and federal agencies have come together to work with the coal company to develop an acceptable mitigation plan. This paper provides an overview of the permitting process, public concerns raised and the efforts to arrive at an acceptable mitigation plan. Modeled changes in topography and potential impacts on the management of the refuge are examined.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Geology of the Mt. Vernon Area, Jefferson County
    557 IL6gui 1989-D Guide to the Geology of the Mt. Vernon Area, Jefferson County David L. Reinertsen Stephen T. Whitaker Leon R. Follmer NOV 2 2 1989 Field Trip Guide Leaflet 1989D November 4, 1989 Department of Energy and Natural Resources "« ^TBTF GEOLOfilHAI ^''W ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Champaign, IL 61820 Cover photo: Geological Science Field Trip participants at the Nuxall Sand Pit northeast of Mt. Vernon. Printed by authority of the State of Illinois/1989/300 OOICAL SURVEY II I INOm STATF OFOI I '''^'^>2 3 3051 /. ' Guide to the Geology of the Mt. Vernon Area, Jefferson County David L. Reinertsen Stephen T. Whitaker Leon R. Follmer GEOLOGICAL SCIENCE FIELD TRIPS are free tours conducted by the Educational Extension Unit of the Illinois State Geological Survey to acquaint the public with the geology, landscape, and mineral resources of Illinois. Each is an all-day excursion through one or more Illinois counties; frequent stops are made for explorations, explanations, and collection of rocks and fossils. People of all ages and interests are welcome. The trips are especially helpful to teachers in preparing earth science units. Grade school students are welcome, but each must be accompanied by a parent or guardian. High school science classes should be supervised by at least one adult for every 10 students. A list of available guide leaflets for earlier trips, which can be used for planning class tours and private outings, may be obtained by contacting the Illinois State Geological Survey, Natural Resources Building, 615 East Peabody Drive, Champaign, IL 61820. (217) 244-2407 or 333-7372.
    [Show full text]
  • Results of Spirit Leveling Illinois 1909 and 1910
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR BULLETIN 493 RESULTS OF SPIRIT LEVELING ILLINOIS 1909 AND 1910 R. B. MARSHALL, CHIEF GEOGEAPHEK WORK DONE IN COOPERATION WITH THE STATE OF ILLINOIS CONTENTS. Page. Introduction.............................................................. 5 Previous publication.................................................... 5 Personnel. ...................... ^.^..................................... 5 Classification......................................................... 5 Bench marks........................................................... 6 Datum............................................................... 6 Topographic maps...................................................... 7 Primary leveling........................................................... 8 Birds, Hardinville, Newton, and Vincennes quadrangles (Crawford, Jasper, Lawrence, Richland, and Wabash counties)........................... 8 Lincoln quadrangle (Logan and Sangamon counties).................... 11 Burlington, Canton, Carthage, Colchester, Havana, Keokuk, La Harpe, Lomax, Macomb, and Vermont quadrangles (Fulton, Hancock, Hender- son, McDonough, and Schuyler counties)............................. 12 Milan quadrangle (Mercer and Rock Island counties).................... 24 Belleville, Kimmswick, and Waterloo quadrangles (Monroe and St. Glair counties)........................................................... 26 Appendix A................................................................ 33
    [Show full text]
  • Perry County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan
    Perry County, Illinois Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan A 2015 Update of the 2009 Countywide MHMP Perry County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Perry County, Illinois Adoption Date: -- _______________________ -- Primary Point of Contact Secondary Point of Contact David H. Searby, Jr. Raymond D. Clark EMA Coordinator ESDA Coordinator Perry County Emergency Management Agency Du Quoin ESDA Perry County Courthouse – Room #15 P.O. Box Pinckneyville, IL 62274 Du Quoin, IL 62832 Phone: (618) 357-6221 Phone: (618) 542-3841 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Perry County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Acknowledgements The Perry County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan would not have been possible without the incredible feedback, input, and expertise provided by the County leadership, citizens, staff, federal and state agencies, and volunteers. We would like to give special thank you to the citizens not mentioned below who freely gave their time and input in hopes of building a stronger, more progressive County. Perry County gratefully acknowledges the following people for the time, energy and resources given to create the Perry County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan. Perry County Board of Commissioners Robert D. Kelly, Chairman Sam Robb James Epplin 2014 Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Steering Committee David Searby, EMA Coordinator, Perry County Emergency Management Agency Raymond Clark, ESDA Coordinator, Du Quoin Emergency Services and Disaster Agency Joyce Rheal, EMA Staff, Perry County Emergency Management Agency Shane Malawy, Administrator, Pinckneyville Ambulance Service Steve Behm, Lieutenant, Perry County Sheriff Bruce Reppert, EMA Staff, Perry County Emergency Management Agency Sandra Webster, Director, American Red Cross Little Egypt Network James Gielow, Chief, Pinckneyville Fire Department / Pinckneyville Rural Fire Protection District Krista Mulholland, Perry County Health Department ii Perry County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents Section 1.
    [Show full text]