DOCSLIB.ORG

Management and Program Audit Rend Lake Conservancy District

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Management and Program Audit Rend Lake Conservancy District STATE OF ILLINOIS OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL MANAGEMENT AND PROGRAM AUDIT REND LAKE CONSERVANCY DISTRICT SEPTEMBER 2004 WILLIAM G. HOLLAND AUDITOR GENERAL SPRINGFIELD OFFICE: CHICAGO OFFICE: ILES PARK PLAZA MICHAEL A. BILANDIC BLDG. • SUITE S-900 740 EAST ASH • 62703-3154 160 NORTH LASALLE • 60601-3103 PHONE: 217/782-6046 PHONE: 312/814-4000 FAX: 217 /785-8222 • TTY: 888/261-2887 FAX: 312/814-4006 OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL WILLIAM G. HOLLAND To the Legislative Audit Commission, the Speaker and Minority Leader of the House of Representatives, the President and Minority Leader of the Senate, the members of the General Assembly, and the Governor: This is our report of the Management and Program Audit of the Rend Lake Conservancy District. The audit was conducted pursuant to Public Act 93-0275, which became effective July 22, 2003. The audit was conducted in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards and the audit standards promulgated by the Office of the Auditor General at 74 Ill. Adm. Code 420.310. The audit report is transmitted in conformance with Section 3-14 of the Illinois State Auditing Act. WILLIAM G. HOLLAND Auditor General Springfield, Illinois September 2004 INTERNET ADDRESS: [email protected] RECYCLED PAPER • SOYBEAN INKS REPORT DIGEST SYNOPSIS The management and program audit, and the financial audit, MANAGEMENT AND which were conducted pursuant to Public Act 93-0275, concluded that PROGRAM AUDIT the Rend Lake Conservancy District has significant deficiencies in virtually all aspects of its management, including: planning; water and FINANCIAL AUDIT sewage operations; personnel; contract management; property and For the Year Ended: equipment management; performance monitoring; and internal controls. April 30, 2004 The management and program audit, which identified REND LAKE deficiencies in 16 areas and recommended more than 70 specific actions, concluded the following: CONSERVANCY DISTRICT • Board. The Board of Trustees needs to fulfill its fiduciary responsibility over the Rend Lake Conservancy District (District). • Budget. The District lacked a proper budget for FY04; revenues were Summary of Findings: over $12 million but the Board authorized $25 million in expenditures. Management and Program Audit: 16 • Losses. The District’s recreational businesses lost $900,000 in FY04. Financial Audit: 15 • Consultants. Outside engineering and legal consultants were paid more than $500,000 in FY04 when a Board ordinance called for internal engineering and legal departments. • Personnel. There was no written staffing plan that analyzed staffing needs and the District lacked an adequate number of Released: September 2004 managers with a business background. • Planning. The District lacked a mission statement, goals and objectives, and a strategic or business plan. The District’s operations did not collect adequate performance data. • Contracts. Contracts were not bid as required by the River Conservancy Districts Act, there was no list of contracts, and tenants were not monitored. The District lacked basic information, such as acres of farmland leased or number of oil wells on District property. • Water. The water billing system made errors; no supervisory reviews were performed to verify the accuracy of bills. Residential customers were on self-determined billing cycles – some paid monthly, some annually, and some in between. • Expenditures. Some expenditures sampled did not appear to State of Illinois benefit the District. The General Fund (which obtains revenues Office of the Auditor General from taxes) was used to make charitable donations and to buy turkeys at Thanksgiving for employees, trustees, and consultants. WILLIAM G. HOLLAND AUDITOR GENERAL The financial statement audit contained 15 findings which included the following: • Controls. Internal controls were materially deficient and included: To obtain a copy of the report contact: – Weaknesses in segregation of duties. Office of the Auditor General – Lack of evidence of supervisory review and approval in 35 of Iles Park Plaza 40 employee timesheets used to prepare payroll. 740 East Ash Street Springfield, IL 62703 – Inadequate controls over cash disbursements. (217) 782-6046 or • Policies. The policies and procedures manual was incomplete. TTY: (888) 261-2887 • Pension Plan. The District failed to enroll employees in the Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) in accordance with IMRF rules This Report Digest is also available on the and regulations. We noted 23 of 51 employees tested who should worldwide web at: have been enrolled into IMRF were not for FY04. http://www.state.il.us/auditor • Purchases. The District did not use purchase orders for non-water purchases and did not use receiving reports for purchases. MANAGEMENT, PROGRAM, AND FINANCIAL AUDIT OF THE REND LAKE CONSERVANCY DISTRICT REND LAKE CONSERVANCY DISTRICT FINANCIAL AUDIT For The Year Ended April 30, 2004 SUMMARY OF General Land in ACTIVITIES Total Government Water Development Recreation Sewage General Revenues: Taxes: Property ....................... 573,529 Personal replacement 55,883 Investment earnings ....... 77,656 Miscellaneous................. (2,358) Transfers - Total General Revenues and Transfers ............. 704,710 Net Program (Expense) Revenue...................... 1,345,236 Change in Net Assets....... 2,049,946 Net Assets, Beginning....... 20,783,455 Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change ..... 1,084,381 Net Assets, Ending $23,917,782 Program Revenues: Charges for Services...... $11,528,421 $ 6,848 $ 7,916,910 $ 149,240 $ 3,245,838 $ 209,585 Operating Grants and Contributions ............... 36,270 18,135 - - 18,135 - Capital Grants and Contributions ............... 96,000 - 96,000 - - - Total Program Revenues 11,660,691 24,983 8,012,910 149,240 3,263,973 209,585 Expenses: Governmental activities: General government .... 781,935 781,935 - - - - Business-type activities: Water............................ 5,228,577 - 5,228,577 - - - Land in Development .. 57,465 - - 57,465 - - Recreation .................... 3,891,833 - - - 3,891,833 - Sewage ......................... 355,645 - - - - 355,645 Indirect Expense Allocation: Governmental activities: General Government (477,357) (477,357) - - - - Business-type activities: Water............................ 211,597 - 211,597 - - - Land in Development .. - - - - - - Recreation .................... 265,760 - - - 265,760 - Sewage ......................... - - - - - - Total Expenses ................. 10,315,455 304,578 5,440,174 57,465 4,157,593 355,645 Net Program (Expense) Revenue........................... $ 1,345,236 $ (279,595) $ 2,572,736 $ 91,775 $ (893,620) $ (146,060) SELECTED ASSET AND LIABILITY ACCOUNT BALANCES Cash and Investments ............................................................................................................................................. $5,564,349 Capital Assets, Net of Accumulated Depreciation.................................................................................................. $23,050,479 Notes Payable......................................................................................................................................................... $5,635,316 Net Assets............................................................................................................................................................... $23,917,782 GENERAL MANAGER During the Audit Period: Mr. Terry Black (Interim) through 6/3/03; Mr. Gary May, 6/4/03 through 6/30/04 Currently: Mr. Glenn Poshard (Interim), beginning 7/6/04 ii MANAGEMENT, PROGRAM, AND FINANCIAL AUDIT OF REND LAKE CONSERVANCY DISTRICT INTRODUCTION Pursuant to Public Act 93-0275, the Office of the Auditor General conducted the management and program audit, and the financial audit of the Rend Lake Conservancy District (District). The audits concluded that the District has significant deficiencies in virtually all aspects of its management, including: planning; water and sewage operations; personnel; contract management; property and equipment management; performance monitoring; and internal controls. The financial statement audit contains 15 findings and recommendations. The management and program audit identified deficiencies in 16 areas and recommended 70 specific actions that the District needed to take. This Report Digest summarizes the findings of both the management and program audit and the financial audit. MANAGEMENT AND PROGRAM AUDIT The management and program audit of the Rend Lake Conservancy District reported many findings in the areas that were audited. These findings indicate that the Board of Trustees (Board) needs to fulfill its fiduciary responsibility over the Rend Lake Conservancy District. • There was no proper budget for the District, the Expense Committee was not functioning, tenants and contractors were not being The Board needs to monitored, and outside engineering and legal consultants were paid fulfill its fiduciary more than $500,000 in fiscal year 2004 when a Board ordinance responsibility over called for internal engineering and legal departments. the Rend Lake • The District’s recreational businesses (e.g., golf, restaurant, and Conservancy shooting) lacked a business plan and lost approximately $900,000 District. after depreciation in fiscal year 2004. • The District did not have a written mission statement, goals and objectives, or complete written policies and procedures. • The District lacked an adequate number of professional managers with a business background.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Franklin County Surface Water Resources
    UNNBfinYQF tUNOeUBMRlf JffURBMMM>MMMN PMynEmEMROH ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Data for this report was obtained from information available in the files of the department of conser- vation^ and other county and state agencies asso- CIATED WITH CONSERVATION. ThE REPORT WAS EDITED BY_ 0. M. Price,, Area Fishery Biologist and A. C. Lopinot^ Chief Fishery Biologist. The final manuscr i pt for . ' printing was typed by Ann Ha ve y, Typ i st . ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION DIVISION OF FISHERIES FRANKLIN COUNTY SURFACE V/ATER RESOURCES BY JAMES S. ALLEN TOM WAYNE FISHERIES BIOLOGISTS AUGUST, ^97^^ Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/franklincountysuOOalle PREFACE The highzr standard of living enjoyed today by Illinois' citizens has resulted IN an increased amount of leisure time to pursue outdoor recreation. There has been an increased interest in boating^ sailing, canoeing_, water-skiing, fishing, skin DIVING, and other WATER ASSOCIATED SPORTS. DEMANDS BY INDUSTRY, AGRICULTURE AND urban EXPANSION HAVE ALSO PLACED HEAVY BURDENS ON SURFACE WATERS. IT IS TIME TO TAKE STOCK OF OUR EXISTING AND POTENTIAL RESOURCES AND PROBLEMS TO PLAN FOR THE FUTURE. A COUNTY WATER RESOURCE REPORT, SUCH AS THIS ONE, IS AN ATTEMPT BY THE DIVISION OF Fisheries of the Illinois Department of Conservation to summarize data on the more IMPORTANT existing WATER RESOURCES AND THEIR RECREATIONAL VALUE. Wl TH THIS DATA available, A METHOD TO APPORTION USAGE OF WATER IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE PUBLIC CAN DETERMINED TOGETHER WITH THE POTENTIAL NEEDS. I This inventory is an extensive survey of the surface water resources and re- lated ITEMS IN Franklin County.
    [Show full text]
  • Rend Lake Fishing
    REND LAKE FISHING Illinois Departmentof /_| Natural Resources LOCATION OF THE THREE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS RESERVOIRSIN ILLINOIS TUSCOLA & DAM CHESTER ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FISHERIES END LAK FISHING GUI BY LARRY B. CRUSE RESERVOIR FISHERY BIOLOGIST AND REVISIONS BY HARRYL. WIGHT RESERVIORS PROGRAM MANAGER MARCH 1996 In Illinois, one has the opportunity to fish many kinds of INTRODUCTION waters; ranging from small artificial lakes to large Corps of Engineers reservoirs, small fast flowing smallmouth Of all outdoor activities, there are few more appealing to bass streams to the mighty Mississippi River; and river thousands ofIllinoisans than fishing, regardlessof their bottomland lakes to Lake Michigan. In terms of acreage, age, sex or financial status. What specifically there is Ilinoisans have 281,475 acresofprivate, public and federal about fishing that appeais to so many is often difficult to impoundments, 256,574 acres of streams and rivers, and describe. To one angler, it may mean a peaceful, 976,640 acres of Lake Michigan in which to fish. One’s meditative way to spend a dayoff. To another, it may be choiceof fish to catchis aiso varied, ranging from bluegiil, the challengeof limiting-out or catching a trophy-size fish. carp, crappie, catfish and bass to walleye, northern pike, Otheranglers feel that fishing is simply great fun. trout and salmon. In one manneror another, man has probably fished since Conversely to what one might believe, fishing is as good, the beginning of time. Archeological evidence (fish bones, if not better, than it was 30 to 60 years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of the Big Muddy River Drainage with Emphasis on Historical Changes
    Fishes of the Big Muddy River Drainage With Emphasis on Historical Changes Brooks M. Burr Department of Zoology Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Illinois 62901 and Melvin L. Warren, Jr. U.S. Forest Service Southern Forest Experiment Station Forest Hydrology Laboratory Oxford, Mississippi 38655 Abstract. The Big Muddy River, a lowland stream located in southwestern Illinois and draining an area of about 6,182 km2, contains a moderately diverse fish fauna of 106 species. The river is properly named, as the mainstem carried historically and continues to transport great quantities of silt. Historically, a large portion of the watershed was wooded, but much of the land has been cleared and put under cultivation. This has exacerbated siltation and eliminated former wetlands adjacent to and communicating with the mainstem and tributaries. Most of the drainage suffers from excessive siltation; dessication during drought periods; and oil-field, sewage effluent, strip-mine, and other industrial pollution. The construction of Crab Orchard, Little Grassy, Devil's Kitchen, Kincaid, Cedar, and Rend lakes effectively eliminated some of the highest quality streams in the drainage. One detrimental effect of these various stresses has been the disappearance of at least 10 native fish species over the past 100 years, including some of sport or commercial value (e.g., blue sucker, burbot). Suggested solutions to these problems include (1) a community ecology approach to future management of the drainage itself and the human made lakes; (2) maintenance or re-establishment of wooded riparian corridors, as well as wetlands adjacent to the river and tributaries, as spawning and nursery sites; (3) continued vigorous reclamation of abandoned mine lands and treatment of acid mine drainage; and (4) discontinuance of stocking of nonnative fishes (e.g., grass carp, bighead carp, striped bass, inland silverside) until their impact can be assessed.
    [Show full text]
  • Stage 1 Report
    STAGE 1 REPORT Rend Lake Watershed TMDL Final Stage 1 Report Prepared for Illinois EPA June 2014 Table of Contents Section 1 Goals and Objectives for the Rend Lake Watershed 1.1 Total Maximum Daily Load Overview ..................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 TMDL Goals and Objectives for the Rend Lake Watershed ............................................................ 1-2 1.3 Report Overview .............................................................................................................................................. 1-4 Section 2 Rend Lake Watershed Description 2.1 Rend Lake Watershed Location ................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Topography ........................................................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.3 Land Use ............................................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3.1 Subbasin Land Use ....................................................................................................................... 2-2 2.4 Soils ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2-6 2.4.1 Rend Lake Watershed Soil Characteristics ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Risky Fishing : Power Plant Mercury Pollution and Illinois Sport Fish , Max Muller, Illinois PIRG Education Fund
    Risky Fishing Power Plant Mercury Pollution and Illinois Sport Fish April 2006 Risky Fishing: Power Plant Mercury Pollution and Illinois Sport Fish Written by Max Muller Environmental Advocate, Illinois PIRG Education Fund April 2006 © 2006, Illinois PIRG Education Fund This report was inspired by and builds off of the work of Emily Figdor, author of the U.S. PIRG Education Fund report “Reel Danger: Power Plant Mercury Emissions and the Fish We Eat,” which was released in August 2004. Report cover and graphics courtesy of Dave Heinzel. The author would like to thank Tom Hornshaw, Emily Langerak, and Rebecca Stanfield for their substantial assistance in reviewing this report and/or providing insight, information, or resources. The author alone is responsible for any factual errors. The opinions expressed in the report are those of the Illinois PIRG Education Fund and do not necessarily express the views of our coalition partners and funders. Illinois PIRG is a state-based, citizen-funded organization that advocates for the public interest. Illinois PIRG’s mission is to deliver persistent, results-oriented activism that protects the environment, encourages a fair marketplace for consumers and fosters responsive, democratic government. To receive a copy of this report, please visit our website or contact the author at: 407 S. Dearborn, Suite 701 Chicago, IL 60605 (312) 364-0096 [email protected] www.illinoispirg.org Table of Contents Executive Summary . 3 Why is Mercury Dangerous? . 6 Sources of Mercury: The Role of Coal-Fired Power Plants . 6 Mercury Deposition . 8 Mercury Levels in Fish . 9 How Much Mercury is Safe? .
    [Show full text]
  • G:\Communications\Fish Advisory Chart 04.Wpd
    ILLINOIS FISH ADVISORIES, 2004 The following meal advisories for fish found with elevated levels of chlordane, methylmercury and polychlorinated biphenyhls (PCBs) are based primarily on protecting sensitive populations, particularly women of childbearing age, pregnant women, fetuses, nursing mothers and children younger than 15 years of age. All advisories may be overprotective for women beyond childbearing age and males 15 years of age and older. PLEASE NOTE: THE METHYLMERCURY ADVISORY APPLIES TO PREDATOR FISH – all species of black bass (largemouth, smallmouth and spotted), striped bass, white bass, hybrid striped bass, walleye, sauger, saugeye, flathead catfish, muskellunge and northern pike – IN ALL ILLINOIS WATERS. For more information on mercury in Illinois fish, see the “Special Mercury Advisory” at the end of this listing. The special advisory and “Facts About Illinois’ Methylmercury Advisory” are available on the Illinois Department of Public Health’s Web site, <www.idph.state.il.us/envhealth/fishadv/fishadvisory04.htm>. Body of Water Area Under Advisory Species Meal Frequency Contaminant Arrowhead Lake All waters Largemouth bass, all sizes See special advisory Mercury Big Muddy River Rend Lake to Rt. 149 Carp, all sizes 1 meal/week PCBs Busse Lake All waters Black bullhead, all sizes 1 meal/week PCBs Channel catfish, all sizes Carp, all sizes 1 meal/month PCBs Calumet River System Calumet River, Sunfish, all sizes 1 meal/week PCBs Cal Sag Channel Little Calumet River Black bass, all sizes 1 meal/month PCBs (from Cal Sag Channel
    [Show full text]