Sugar Camp Energy, LLC Mine No. 1 Expansion - Revision 6 EIS
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Document Type: EIS-Administrative Record Index Field: Final EIS Project Name: Sugar Camp Mine No. 1 Project Number: 2019-28 SUGAR CAMP ENERGY, LLC MINE NUMBER 1 – BOUNDARY REVISION 6 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Franklin and Hamilton Counties, Illinois Lead Agency: TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Knoxville, Tennessee Cooperating Agency: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Chicago, Illinois October 2020 This page intentionally left blank COVER SHEET Sugar Camp Energy, LLC Mine No. 1 Expansion - Revision 6 EIS Proposed action: The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) proposes to authorize the mining of TVA-owned coal, currently leased to Sugar Camp Energy, LLC, underlying approximately 12,125 acres in southern Illinois. Associated actions include the planned subsidence of much of the mined area, the construction of five Bleeder Shaft Facilities, and the processing of the coal at an existing Coal Preparation Plant. Type of document: Final Environmental Impact Statement Lead agency: Tennessee Valley Authority Cooperating agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency To request information, contact: Elizabeth Smith Tennessee Valley Authority 400 West Summit Hill Drive, WT11B Knoxville, Tennessee 37902-1499 E-Mail: [email protected] Abstract: TVA evaluates a No Action and Action Alternative in this EIS. The Action Alternative consists of TVA approving the extraction of TVA-owned coal from an area of approximately 12,125 acres, the construction and operation of five Bleeder Shaft Facilities, and the planned subsidence of the ground surface above the extracted coal. Connected actions include processing, storing, and transporting the extracted coal via existing and proposed facilities. Under the No Action Alternative, TVA would not approve the extraction of the TVA-owned coal, and extracting, processing, storing, and transporting other coal in the area would continue. The Action Alternative is preferred due to being economically feasible, having similar environmental impacts to other alternatives, and meeting the purpose and need. Final Environmental Impact Statement i This page intentionally left blank Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Purpose and Need for Action TVA owns the coal reserves beneath the Project Area and executed a coal lease agreement in July 2002 with Sugar Camp Energy, LLC (Sugar Camp) to mine TVA-owned coal in Franklin, Hamilton, and Jefferson counties, Illinois. The purpose of the coal lease agreement is to facilitate the recovery of TVA-owned coal reserves in an environmentally sound manner. The Proposed Action would implement the terms of the existing coal lease agreement and recoup TVA’s investment. Under the terms of the coal lease agreement, Sugar Camp may not commence mining of TVA-owned coal reserves until completion of all environmental reviews required for compliance with applicable laws and regulations. In fulfillment of its responsibilities under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), TVA has prepared this Final Environmental Impact Statement to consider whether TVA will approve the proposed plan to extract TVA-owned coal within a 12,125-acre shadow area permitted under Significant Boundary Revision (SBR) Number (No.) 6 of Illinois Underground Coal Mine (UCM) Permit No. 382 and process the TVA-owned coal at existing and proposed facilities within the surface effects area of Sugar Camp Mine No. 1. Alternatives In this environmental impact statement (EIS), TVA evaluates a No Action Alternative and Action Alternative. The Action Alternative would consist of TVA approving the plan to extract TVA- owned coal reserves within a 12,125-acre portion of the overall SBR No. 6 shadow area (hereafter, the Shadow Area). The Action Alternative would involve the associated construction and operation of five Bleeder Shaft Facilities in different locations within the Shadow Area, together totaling approximately 27 acres. Planned subsidence (controlled sinking of the ground at the surface) of approximately 10,549 acres within the Shadow Area would result. Connected actions include processing of the extracted TVA-owned coal at an existing Coal Preparation Plant within an existing 2,420-acre surface effects area; treatment of the byproducts at both existing facilities and one new facility, known as the East Refuse Disposal Area; surface storage of coal; and offsite transport of processed coal via an existing rail loop. These facilities also process, store, and transport privately owned coal mined without TVA approval. Together, the 12,125-acre Shadow Area and the 2,420-acre surface effects area compose the Project Area. TVA’s analysis of the Action Alternative takes into account the proposed mining plan in addition to the effects associated with ongoing mining operations. Under the No Action Alternative, TVA assumes that Sugar Camp would continue the previously approved mining of approximately 25,847 acres of TVA-owned coal and privately owned coal (hereafter, the private/TVA-approved shadow area). In addition, Sugar Camp would continue processing, storing, and transporting the previously approved TVA-owned and privately owned coal. Affected Environment The Sugar Camp Mine No. 1 is located in Hamilton and Franklin counties in Illinois. The regional character is mostly rural, with agricultural and pasture fields, flat terrain with rolling hills, forested areas, and generally small towns and communities. The Project Area is located east of the City of Benton. Current land use within much of the surface effects area is heavy industrial and includes operation of existing facilities for the processing, storage and transport of coal. Within the Shadow Area, current land use is primarily rural agricultural with some scattered residences. Nine historical archaeological sites, one Final Environmental Impact Statement iii Sugar Camp Energy, LLC Mine Number 1 – Boundary Revision 6 Precontact period archaeological site, and three potentially historic buildings have been recorded within the Project Area or vicinity. The other buildings in the vicinity of the Project are residential and/or farmstead buildings. Five churches and three cemeteries of unknown age are present within the Shadow Area. The Shadow Area is located in the southern portion of the Illinois Basin coalfield. The Herrin No. 6 coal seam, which is proposed to be mined, lies from 650 feet to more than 900 feet below ground. Seven named streams, Granny Creek, Carlton Branch, Web Hill Branch, Sugar Camp Creek, Campbell Branch, Sullivan Branch, Ewing Creek, and Middle Fork Big Muddy River as well as multiple unnamed tributaries and creeks flow through the Shadow Area and surface effects area. The majority of the Project Area is characterized by a heavily fragmented landscape dominated by early successional habitat, such as pastures and hayfields. Forested areas and wetlands are scattered throughout and support a variety of plants and animals. Environmental Consequences Coal mining activities would occur under either the No Action Alternative or the Action Alternative. Reasonably foreseeable greenhouse gas emissions, including downstream emissions, are quantified. Other environmental consequences associated with either alternative, including the Action Alternative, have been deemed not significant and, for the most part, would be temporary due to minimization and mitigation efforts required in Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) permit conditions. Minor, temporary impacts to soils, groundwater, floodplains, surface waters and wetlands, vegetation, wildlife, and aquatic life would occur with either alternative. Other resources that would be temporarily affected under either alternative include prime farmland, water quality and supply, natural areas, land use, transportation, utilities, noise, and visual. These impacts would be minimized or mitigated per IDNR permit requirements. Under either alternative, permanent changes to geology would occur due to the removal of a portion of the Herrin No. 6 coal seam. Construction of the East Refuse Disposal Area, which constitutes an expansion of the existing surface effects area under either alternative, would result in permanent impacts to utilities, North Bobtail Road, wetlands, and land use. These impacts would be offset through required minimization and mitigation efforts. Solid and hazardous waste and human health and safety impacts would be avoided due to compliance with relevant regulations and avoidance and mitigation measures under either alternative. Relative beneficial effects on socioeconomics would occur with either alternative. Environmental justice impacts would be avoided due to compliance with IDNR permit requirements to avoid, minimize, or mitigate the adverse effects of mining operations. Under the Action Alternative, TVA would require appropriate consultations with the pertinent federal and state agencies to ensure impacts associated with the Bleeder Shaft Facilities to cultural resources and to federally and state-listed species are avoided, minimized, or mitigated. Generally, these consultations are also required under the No Action Alternative, per IDNR permit conditions. iv Final Environmental Impact Statement Contents Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 – PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION ...................................................................... 1-1 1.1. Background ........................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.2. Decision to be Made ............................................................................................................