Social Snakes? the Role of Kin Selection in Rattlesnake Aggregations Melissa Amarello1 and Jeffrey J

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Social Snakes? the Role of Kin Selection in Rattlesnake Aggregations Melissa Amarello1 and Jeffrey J LOCAL RESEARCH NEWS Social Snakes? The role of kin selection in rattlesnake aggregations Melissa Amarello1 and Jeffrey J. Smith2 1School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA; [email protected] 2The Nature Conservancy, 6502 N Muleshoe Ranch RD, Willcox, Arizona, USA; [email protected] Studies of animal sociality have long challenged our understanding of evolution and provoked some of the greatest debates in the field. Although sociality takes a variety of forms, researchers have historically selected the most extreme forms of eusocial- ity and cooperative taxa for intensive study (Ebensperger 2001, Cahan et Studies of al. 2002, Davis et al. 2011, Clark et al. 2012). However, simpler, often over- animal sociality looked forms of sociality may better have long chal- inform us about the evolutionary causes and consequences of social lenged our un- behavior (Cahan et al. 2002, Chapple Figure 1. Yellow Man (center, adult male Crotalus cerberus) with several juveniles and derstanding of 2003, Davis et al. 2011). females basking at a den entrance. Photo by Melissa Amarello, April 2011. Aggregations (groups) of animals represent some plays a role in rattlesnake aggregations, pairs with high- evolution and of the simplest forms of sociality and may lead to the er association indices will be more related than pairs provoked some evolution of complex sociality (Graves and Duvall that do not spend much (or any) time together. 1995). Animals may aggregate for active (e.g., allo- Since April 2011, we have used remote timelapse of the greatest parenting, group defense, kin selection; Vonhof et cameras (Timelapse PlantCam and TimelapseCam debates in the al. 2004) or passive benefits (e.g., thermoregulation; 8.0, Wingscapes, Inc., Alabaster, AL, USA) to re- Graves and Duvall 1995). According to Hamilton’s cord behavior of C. cerberus in aggregations at a site field. Although rule, an individual can increase its fitness by helping near Prescott, Arizona. Some pregnant females, their sociality takes relatives (Hamilton 1964); thus, active and passive ben- offspring, and the occasional male aggregate at these efits of grouping may be enhanced by associating with sites during the summer active season (Amarello et al. a variety of kin (Vonhof et al. 2004, Davis et al. 2011). Kin-based 2011), but most aggregation behavior happens dur- forms, re- groups are widespread, but have only recently been ing the spring, so we focused our efforts during this described in lizards and snakes (Chapple 2003, Davis period (ca. mid-April through mid-May). We identified searchers have et al. 2011, Clark et al. 2012). 78 individual rattlesnakes (42 adults and 36 juveniles), historically se- Although typically regarded as asocial, some collected DNA samples from over 50, and observed rattlesnakes form aggregations (Graves and Duvall them a total of 531 times. lected the most 1995, Clark et al. 2012), recognize and preferentially To date, we have documented nonrandom pat- extreme forms associate with kin (Clark 2004, Clark et al. 2012), and terns of association in C. cerberus, suggesting that they possess traits linked to complex sociality: long lifespan, aggregate for active rather than passive benefits. Some of eusociality late maturation, and viviparity (Ebensperger 2001, rattlesnakes are more gregarious than others, and they and cooperative Chapple 2003). Rattlesnake aggregations are assumed are choosy about whom they associate with (Amarello to be resource-based because they usually occur in 2012). Our collaborator at the University of Arizona, taxa for inten- cool climates where habitat providing opportunities Dr. Hans-Werner Herrmann, identified 38 informa- sive study. to thermoregulate may be limited (Graves and Duvall tive microsatellite DNA markers for genotyping C. 1995). However, in the relatively warm climate of cerberus, so we can examine how relatedness affects the Arizona, Arizona Black Rattlesnakes (Crotalus cerberus) strength of these associations. aggregate at winter hibernacula and nesting sites. We are only beginning to understand the complex We hypothesize that C. cerberus preferentially aggre- social lives of rattlesnakes (Clark et al. 2012, Amarello gate with kin to increase their indirect fitness through 2012) and comparing the ecology of C. cerberus to aso- kin selection (Hamilton 1964). We will test the kin cial and social squamates will provide further informa- selection hypothesis by calculating relatedness and an tion on the evolution of sociality (Chapple 2003). But association index (percent time seen together) for each perhaps most important, our data are used to facilitate pair of rattlesnakes. We predict that, if kin selection snake conservation through education. Pernicious SONORAN HERPETOLOGIST 25 (12) 2012 129 myths and popular media that have long portrayed snakes as malicious villains instill and nurture fear of snakes, which has led to widespread persecution and obstruction to conservation efforts (Seigel and Mullin 2009). In contrast to how snakes are usually seen in the media, recent research on rattlesnakes reveals be- havior that appeals to the general public: parental care (Greene et al. 2002, Amarello et al. 2011), cooperation (Amarello et al. 2011), and social interactions (Clark et al. 2012, Amarello 2012). By revealing the social nature of rattlesnakes through live and virtual outlets (Amarello and Smith 2012), we are helping to change the public’s perception of snakes from “cold-blooded killer” to social creatures with complex family lives. Thanks to those who inspired, supported, and assisted us: M. Cardwell, R. Clark, D. DeNardo, M. Feldner, H. Greene, K. McGraw, J. Porter, R. Repp, By revealing B. Rogers, G. Schuett, M. Seward, J. Slone, B. Sullivan, Arizona Game and Fish Department (SP796730 and the social na- SP729143), and ASU IACUC. The Tucson Herpeto- ture of rattle- logical Society, National Science Foundation, Chicago Herpetological Society, Herpetologists’ League, Wing- snakes through scapes, and Rocket Hub supporters provided funding live and vir- for this project. tual outlets Literature Cited (Amarello and Amarello, M., J.J. Smith, and J. Slone. 2011. Family val- Smith 2012), ues: Maternal care in rattlesnakes is more than mere we are help- attendance. Available from Nature Precedings <dx. Figure 2. Barb (left, juvenile Crotalus cerberus) basking with doi.org/10.1038/npre.2011.6671.1> Flash (right, adult male) near a den. Photo by Melissa Amarello, ing to change Amarello, M., and J.J. Smith. 2012. SocialSnakes [blog]. April 2012. the public’s <blog.socialsnakes.org> London Series B 278:1507-1514. Amarello, M. 2012. Social Snakes? Non-random Ebensperger, L.A. 2001. A review of the evolutionary perception of association patterns detected in a population of causes of rodent group-living. Acta Theriologica snakes from Arizona black rattlesnakes (Crotalus cerberus). M.S. 46:115-144. Thesis, Arizona State University, Tempe. Graves, B.M., and D. Duvall. 1995. Aggregation of “cold-blooded Cahan, S.H., D.T. Blumstein, L. Sundström, J. Liebig, squamate reptiles associated with gestation, oviposi- killer” to social and A. Griffin. 2002. Social trajectories and the tion, and parturition. Herpetological Monographs evolution of social behavior. Oikos 96:206-216. 9:102-119. creatures with Chapple, D.G. 2003. Ecology, life-history, and behav- Greene, H.W., P. May, D.L. Hardy, Sr., J. M. Sciturro, complex family ior in the Australian Scincid genus Egernia, with and T. Farrell. 2002. Parental behavior by vipers. comments on the evolution of complex sociality in Pages 179-205 in: G.W. Schuett, M. Höggren, M.E. lives. lizards. Herpetological Monographs 17:145-180. Douglas, and H.W. Greene, editors. Biology of the Clark, R.W. 2004. Kin recognition in rattlesnakes. vipers. Eagle Mountain Publishing, Eagle Moun- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series tain, Utah, USA. B: Biological Sciences 271:S243-S245. Hamilton, W.D. 1964. The genetical evolution of social Clark, R.W., W.S. Brown, R. Stechert, and H.W. behaviour. I. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7:1-16. Greene. 2012. Cryptic sociality in rattlesnakes (Cro- Seigel, R.A., and S.J. Mullin. 2009. Snake conservation, talus horridus) detected by kinship analysis. Biology present and future. Pages 281-290 in: S.J. Mullin and Letters 8:523-525. R.A. Seigel, editors. Snakes: ecology and conserva- Croft, D.P., R. James, and J.Krause. 2008. Explor- tion. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, USA. ing Animal Social Networks. Princeton University Vonhof, M.J., H. Whitehead, and M.B. Fenton. 2004. Press, Princeton, N.J., USA. Analysis of Spix’s disc-winged bat association Davis, A.R., A. Corl, Y. Surget-Groba, and B. Sinervo. patterns and roosting home ranges reveal a novel 2011. Convergent evolution of kin-based social- social structure among bats. Animal Behaviour ity in a lizard. Proceedings of the Royal Society of 68:507-521. SONORAN HERPETOLOGIST 25 (12) 2012 130.
Recommended publications
  • List1 Stránka 1 Agama Agama Agama Agama Agama
    List1 Adax Adax nasomaculatus Agama Acanthosaura capra Agama Physignathus lesueri Agama Schinisaurus crocodilurus Agama Pogona vitticeps Agama Hydrosaurs pustulatus Agama hardůn Stellio stellio Agama himalájská Stellio himalayanus Agama kavkazská Stellio caucasicus Agama lehmanova Stellio lehmanni Agama límcová Chlamydosaurus kingii Agama motýlí Leiolepis belliana Agama mozambická Agama mossambica Agama stepní Tropelus sanquinolentus Agama vodní Physignathus cocincinus Agama webrova Hydrosaurus weberi Agamka písečná Phrynocephalus mystaceus Agamka sluneční Phrynocephalus helioscopus persicus Aguti zlatý Dasyprocta aguti Akuči červený Myoprocta acouchy Alexandr čínský Psittacula derbiana Alexandr malý Psittacula krameri Aligátor čínský Alligator sinensis Aligátor severoamerický Alligator mississippiensis Amazoňan červenočelý menší Amazona d.rhodocorytha Amazoňan červenočelý větší Amazona d.dufresiana Amazoňan fialovotemenný menší Amazona f.finschi Amazoňan haitský Amazona ventralis Amazoňan jamajský Amazona colaria Amazoňan kubánský Amazona leucocephala Amazoňan modrobradý Amazona festiva Amazoňan modročelý Amazona aestiva Amazoňan modročelý větší Amazona aestiva xanthopteryx Amazoňan oranžovokřídlý Amazona amazonica Amazoňan pomoučený karibský Amazona farinosa guatemalae Amazoňan vějířový Deroptyus accipitrinus Amazoňan vínorudý Amazona vinacea Amazoňan žlutohlavý Amazona ochrocephala Amazoňan žlutohlavý velký Amazona ochrocephala oratrix Amazoňan žlutolící ekvádorský Amazona autumnalis lilacina Amazoňan žlutolící větší Amazona autumnalis
    [Show full text]
  • Een Aantal Ontmoetingen Met De Arizona Black Rattlesnake Crotalus Cerberus (Coues, 1875)
    EEN AANTAL ONTMOETINGEN MET DE ARIZONA BLACK RATTLESNAKE CROTALUS CERBERUS (COUES, 1875) SOME ENCOUNTERS WITH THE ARIZONA BLACK RATTLESNAKE CROTALUS CERBERUS (COUES, 1875) Bernd Skubowius Bernd Skubowius www.pinesnake.de www.pinesnake.de Crotalus cerberus van de familie Viperidae, The Crotalus cerberus of the family Viperi- subfamilie Crotalinae is een donkergekleur- dae, subfamily Crotalinae is a dark coloured de ratelslang van gemiddelde grootte, die midsize rattlesnake that is rarely seen in na- men zelden tegenkomt, niet in de natuur ture and terrariums. It seldom grows more en niet in terraria. Deze ratelslang wordt than a few cm larger than one meter and vrijwel nooit groter dan één meter en heeft normally has 25-46 dark brown to black normaal gesproken 25-46 donkerbruine tot saddle-shaped blotches on a dark gray- zwarte zadelvormige vlekken op een don- brown to black background. Some individu- kergrijsbruin tot zwarte achtergrond. Een als and local forms retain thin white, yellow enkeling en een paar lokale soorten behou- or orange bands on the back and body side den tussen de vlekken dunne witte, gele of between the blotches. It is reminiscent of oranje banden op de rug en zijkant van het the juvenile pattern and colouration, which lichaam. Het doet denken aan het patroon have the dark brown blotches on white to en de kleur van de jongen, die donkerbrui- light grey ground colour. With the ontoge- ne vlekken hebben met een witte tot licht- netic colour and pattern change from the grijze basiskleur. Met de ontogenetische young snakes to adults, most Crotalus cer- kleurenpatroon dat verandert bij overgang berus lose their patterns and become uni- van juveniel naar volwassenen, verliezen de coloured black.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylogenetic Approach to Understanding the Evolution of The
    A Phylogenetic Approach to Understanding Rattlesnake Evolution By Bradley Allf Senior Honors Thesis Biology Department ./ University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill April 6, 2015 ! INTRODUCTION) ! One!of!the!biggest!questions!of!evolutionary!biology!is!how!novel!traits!arise!and! fixate!in!a!population.!Rattlesnakes!(a!monophyletic!group!within!Viperidae)!are!equipped! with!a!keratinized!tail!tip!of!overlapping!hollow!segments!that!makes!sound!when!vibrated.! This!structure!is!unique!to!rattlesnakes,!which!use!it!for!aposematic!signaling!(Greene! 1988).!!A!better!understanding!of!how!this!novel!structure!evolved!could!shed!light!on!how! novel!traits!arise!in!general.!!! ! Though!many!researchers!have!postulated!hypotheses!about!the!evolutionary! origins!of!the!rattlesnake!rattle!(for!example,!Rowe!et!al.!2002;!Klauber!1972;!Young!and! Brown!1995),!it!is!still!unclear!what!exactly!led!to!the!evolution!of!this!unique!structure.! Some!authors!support!the!idea!that!the!rattle!evolved!to!enhance!the!sound!produced!by! tailQvibrating!in!an!extinct!rattlesnake!ancestor!(Klauber!1972;!Rowe!et!al.!2002;!Moon! 2001).!TailQvibrating!is!a!defensive!signal!where!a!snake!vibrates!its!tail!rapidly,!often! against!a!substrate,!producing!a!buzzing!sound.!This!widespread!behavior!almost!certainly! serves!as!a!warning!and/or!distraction!to!a!potential!predator,!though!this!has!never!been! tested!specifically.!TailQvibrating!is!used!in!a!similar!context!as!rattlesnake!rattling,!and!the! movement!itself!is!strongly!reminiscent!of!rattlesnake!rattling,!the!major!difference!being!
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecometrics of Locomotion and Macroenvironment in North American Snakes
    Lawing, A.M., J.J. Head, and P.D. Polly. 2012. The ecology of morphology: the ecometrics of locomotion and macroenvironment in North American snakes. Pp. 117-146 in J. Louys (ed), Paleontology in Ecology and Conservation. Springer-Verlag, Berlin and Heidelberg (doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-25038-5_7) ONLINE SUPPLEMENTAL DATA Appendix Table 1. Species identifications for specimens used in the mean length to width ratio analysis. Trait is the mean length divided by width for all vertebrae within a specimen. Substrate use is a function of locomotion and describes the typical locomotor behavior of the species and includes categories aquatic (n=3), semiaquatic (n=2), arboreal (n=4), semiarboreal (n=1), fossorial (n=4), semifossorial (n=1) and terrestrial (n=14). Species Collection ID # of Trait Substrate Use Vertebrae Acrochordus javanicus LSU 17009 271 0.617 Aquatic Agkistrodon piscivorous SMU-R 143 179 0.642 Semiaquatic Ahaetulla nasuta BMNH 1964.1225 315 1.035 Arboreal Anilius scytale BMNH 56.10.16 239 0.685 Fossorial Arizona elegans CJB Lab UT 282 0.659 Terrestrial Bitis arietans BMNH unnumbered 170 0.624 Terrestrial Crotalus molossus UTA-R 14512 205 0.522 Terrestrial Cylindrophis rufus BMNH unnumbered 223 0.684 Fossorial Dendroaspis viridis BMNH unnumbered 348 0.826 Arboreal Epicrates chenchria BMNH 62.6.13.1 329 0.524 Semiarboreal Erythrolamprus aesculapii BMNH 6111.18.7 244 0.642 Terrestrial Eunectes murinus BMNH unnumbered 311 0.574 Semiaquatic Hydrophis fasciatus BMNH 1931.1.12.5 255 0.788 Aquatic Lachesis muta MVZ 163372 277 0.569 Terrestrial Laticaudata laticaudata BMNH unnumbered 282 0.662 Aquatic Masticophis flagellum CJB Lab UT 290 0.454 Terrestrial Micrurus fuluvius CJB Lab UT 262 0.803 Semifossorial Morelia spilota BMNH 88.10.27.2 361 0.544 Terrestrial Naja nigricollis MVZ 176453 266 0.616 Terrestrial Oxybelis fulgidus BMNH unnumbered 348 1.020 Arboreal Pareas carinatus BMNH 91.5.1.14 237 0.869 Arboreal Python molurus BMNH unnumbered 327 0.524 Terrestrial Python regius SMU 145 248 0.454 Terrestrial Storeria d.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetically Diverse Diets Favor More Complex Venoms in North
    Phylogenetically diverse diets favor more complex venoms in North American pitvipers Matthew L. Holdinga,b,1 , Jason L. Stricklanda,2 , Rhett M. Rautsawa , Erich P. Hofmanna,3 , Andrew J. Masona,c, Michael P. Hoganb , Gunnar S. Nystromb, Schyler A. Ellsworthb , Timothy J. Colstonb,4 , Miguel Borjad, Gamaliel Castaneda-Gayt˜ an´ d , Christoph I. Grunwald¨ e, Jason M. Jonese , Luciana A. Freitas-de-Sousaf , Vincent Louis Vialag,h , Mark J. Margresa,i,5 , Erika Hingst-Zaherj , Inacio´ L. M. Junqueira-de-Azevedog,h , Ana M. Moura-da-Silvaf,k , Felipe G. Grazziotinl , H. Lisle Gibbsc , Darin R. Rokytab , and Christopher L. Parkinsona,m,1 aDepartment of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634; bDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306; cDepartment of Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210; dFacultad de Ciencias Biologicas,´ Universidad Juarez´ del Estado de Durango, C.P. 35010 Gomez´ Palacio, Dgo., Mexico; eHERP.MX A.C., Villa del Alvarez,´ Colima 28973, Mexico; fLaboratorio´ de Imunopatologia, Instituto Butantan, Sao˜ Paulo 05503-900, Brazil; gLaboratorio´ de Toxinologia Aplicada, Instituto Butantan, Sao˜ Paulo 05503-900, Brazil; hCenter of Toxins, Immune-Response and Cell Signaling, Sao˜ Paulo 05503-900, Brazil; iDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; jMuseu Biologico,´ Instituto Butantan, Sao˜ Paulo 05503-900, Brazil; kInstituto de Pesquisa Cl´ınica Carlos Borborema, Fundac¸ao˜ de Medicina Tropical Doutor Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus 69040, Brazil; lLaboratorio´ de Colec¸oes˜ Zoologicas,´ Instituto Butantan, Sao˜ Paulo 05503-900, Brazil; and mDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Conservation, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634 Edited by Jonathan B.
    [Show full text]
  • Crotalus Oreganus)
    University of Northern Colorado Scholarship & Creative Works @ Digital UNC Undergraduate Honors Theses Student Research 5-14-2021 Analysis of the Venoms of Four Subspecies of the Western Rattlesnake (Crotalus oreganus) Natalie Crouch [email protected] Stephen P. Mackessy University of Northern Colorado Follow this and additional works at: https://digscholarship.unco.edu/honors Recommended Citation Crouch, Natalie and Mackessy, Stephen P., "Analysis of the Venoms of Four Subspecies of the Western Rattlesnake (Crotalus oreganus)" (2021). Undergraduate Honors Theses. 52. https://digscholarship.unco.edu/honors/52 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at Scholarship & Creative Works @ Digital UNC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarship & Creative Works @ Digital UNC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. University of Northern Colorado Greeley, Colorado Analysis of the Venoms of Four Subspecies of the Western Rattlesnake (Crotalus oreganus) A Thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment for Graduation with Honors Distinction and the Degree of Bachelor of Science Natalie Crouch School of Biological Sciences College of Natural and Health Sciences May 14, 2021 2 Analysis of the Venoms of Four Subspecies of the Western Rattlesnake (Crotalus oreganus) PREPARED BY: ______________________________________________________ Natalie Crouch APPROVED BY THESIS ADVISOR: Stephen P. Mackessy, Ph.D. HONORS DEPARTMENT LIAISON: Stephen P. Mackessy, Ph.D. HONORS DIRECTOR: Loree Crow, M.A. RECEIVED BY THE UNIVERSITY THESIS/CAPSTONE PROJECT COMMITTEE ON: May 14, 2021 3 Analysis of the Venoms of Four Subspecies of the Western Rattlesnake (Crotalus oreganus) Natalie Crouch (Dr. Stephen P.
    [Show full text]
  • Table S3.1. Habitat Use of Sampled Snakes. Taxonomic Nomenclature
    Table S3.1. Habitat use of sampled snakes. Taxonomic nomenclature follows the current classification indexed in the Reptile Database ( http://www.reptile-database.org/ ). For some species, references may reflect outdated taxonomic status. Individual species are coded for habitat association according to Table 3.1. References for this table are listed below. Habitat use for species without a reference were inferred from sister taxa. Broad Habitat Specific Habit Species Association Association References Acanthophis antarcticus Semifossorial Terrestrial-Fossorial Cogger, 2014 Acanthophis laevis Semifossorial Terrestrial-Fossorial O'Shea, 1996 Acanthophis praelongus Semifossorial Terrestrial-Fossorial Cogger, 2014 Acanthophis pyrrhus Semifossorial Terrestrial-Fossorial Cogger, 2014 Acanthophis rugosus Semifossorial Terrestrial-Fossorial Cogger, 2014 Acanthophis wellsi Semifossorial Terrestrial-Fossorial Cogger, 2014 Achalinus meiguensis Semifossorial Subterranean-Debris Wang et al., 2009 Achalinus rufescens Semifossorial Subterranean-Debris Das, 2010 Acrantophis dumerili Terrestrial Terrestrial Andreone & Luiselli, 2000 Acrantophis madagascariensis Terrestrial Terrestrial Andreone & Luiselli, 2000 Acrochordus arafurae Aquatic-Mixed Intertidal Murphy, 2012 Acrochordus granulatus Aquatic-Mixed Intertidal Lang & Vogel, 2005 Acrochordus javanicus Aquatic-Mixed Intertidal Lang & Vogel, 2005 Acutotyphlops kunuaensis Fossorial Subterranean-Burrower Hedges et al., 2014 Acutotyphlops subocularis Fossorial Subterranean-Burrower Hedges et al., 2014
    [Show full text]
  • Reptile Anatomy Spring 2010
    Ecol 483/583 – Herpetology Lab 12: Reptile Anatomy Spring 2010 P.J. Bergmann & S. Foldi Lab objectives The objectives of today’s lab are to: 1. Learn the basic internal anatomy of the major reptilian groups. 2. Learn the differences in anatomy among these major groups. 3. Consolidate your knowledge of “reptile” diversity. Today’s lab is the final reptile lab. It will introduce you to some basic anatomy of reptilian groups, give you a chance to dissect a specimen, and compare anatomy among the “reptiles”. As it is the last indoor lab that is devoted to “reptile” clades, you are encouraged to spend any extra time reviewing from the previous labs. Keep in mind that your lab final is quickly approaching, so make sure that you use your time wisely. Tips for learning the material Anatomy is a very detailed and precise field of science. Small differences matter and every structure has a name. Although we are not learning any new species during this lab period, there is a considerable amount of material to learn, so do not blow this lab off. You should already be familiar with the external anatomy of the “reptiles”, so today’s lab will focus on the internal anatomy. Some of this will be osteology (the study of bones), and some will soft tissues. To learn the material, work through everything on display systematically. Pay attention to how bones and organs are arranged in each animal. Also be aware of how these animals’ anatomies differ from one another. A turtle will have a different arrangement of organs from a snake.
    [Show full text]
  • Gila Symposium 2008
    the new mexico botanist Special Issue Number 2 October 2010 proceedings of the second Natural History of the Gila Symposium October 16–18, 2008 Western New Mexico University Silver City, New Mexico edited by William Norris Department of Natural Sciences, Western New Mexico University Richard Felger Research Associate, San Diego Natural History Museum and Herbarium, University of Arizona Kelly Kindscher Senior Scientist, Kansas Biological Survey, University of Kansas 2010 Proceedings of the Second Natural History of the Gila Symposium, October 2008 / The New Mexico Botanist, Special Issue No. 2, October 2010 Contents Introduction .................................................................................................. 1 Winter Birds of Nichols Canyon, New Mexico Carol L. Campbell............................................................................................ 3 Cienaga Restoration at the Pitchfork Ranch (Grant County, New Mexico) A. T. Cole and Cinda Cole ..................................................................................11 The Nature Conservancy’s Conservation Action Plan for the Gila Headwaters Martha S. Cooper ...........................................................................................29 Founding the Forest: A New View of the Land Jolane Culhane ..............................................................................................35 Trees of the Gila Forest Region, New Mexico Richard Felger and Kelly Kindscher ........................................................................38
    [Show full text]
  • Rattlesnake Facts: • Reportedly Used in Famous Hopi Snake Dance Ritual • Scientists Have Identified 36 Rattlesnake Species
    Arizona Rattlesnakes Ridge-nosed Rattlesnake (Crotalus willardi) • Up to 26" long Western Diamond-backed Rattlesnake • Gets its name from raised ridge of scales around front of snout Twin-spotted Rattlesnake (Crotalus atrox) • Arizona Ridge-nosed Rattlesnake is official state reptile (Crotalus pricei) • Up to 66" long • One of four rattlesnake species with special protection in Arizona • Up to 26" long Western Rattlesnake • Largest rattlesnake in the West • Small rattle sounds like insect (Crotalus oreganus) • Responsible for more bites and deaths Speckled Rattlesnake • One of four rattlesnake species • Up to 63" long to humans than any other rattlesnake (Crotalus mitchellii) with special protection in Arizona • Has venom twice as strong as Western Diamond-backed species in U.S. • Up to 51" long Rattlesnake, but produces less venom • Color can vary greatly from nearly white to pink, gray or brown Rock Rattlesnake • Color often matches their (Crotalus lepidus) surroundings • Up to 33" long • Young use brightly colored tail to attract prey, but Mohave Rattlesnake tail changes color as snake gets older (Crotalus scutulatus) • One of four rattlesnake species with special Black-tailed Rattlesnake • Up to 50" long protection in Arizona (Crotalus molossus) • Widely considered most toxic • Up to 48" long rattlesnake in U.S. • Color can vary greatly from brown or • Easily confused with Western beige to green or golden yellow Diamond-backed Rattlesnake Sidewinder (Crotalus cerastes) • Up to 25" long • Travels in side-winding motion Arizona Black Rattlesnake • Only rattlesnake with horns over eyes (Crotalus cerberus) • Up to 42" long Prairie Rattlesnake • Young are vividly patterned and can look very different from adults (Crotalus viridis) • Up to 64" long Rattlesnake Facts: • Reportedly used in famous Hopi snake dance ritual • Scientists have identified 36 rattlesnake species.
    [Show full text]
  • BULLETIN Chicago Herpetological Society
    BULLETIN of the Chicago Herpetological Society Volume 53, Number 9 September 2018 BULLETIN OF THE CHICAGO HERPETOLOGICAL SOCIETY Volume 53, Number 9 September 2018 Miscellanea Herpetologica Gabonica XIV . Olivier S. G. Pauwels, Laila Bahaa-el-din, Jean-Louis Albert, Piero Carlino, Francesco Giannuzzi, Laurent Chirio, Jean-François Gillet, Eddy Poirier and Tariq Stévart 185 Notes on Reproduction of Little Mexican Toads, Anaxyrus kelloggi (Anura: Bufonidae), from Sinaloa, Mexico . .Stephen R. Goldberg 191 The Banana Industry: A Zoological Goldmine . R. Michael Burger 192 A Tiny Snake and a Lotta Bull . Roger A. Repp 195 What You Missed at the August Meeting: Frank Ziegler . .John Archer 199 Herpetology 2018......................................................... 202 Minutes of the CHS Board Meeting, August 17, 2018 . 203 News and Announcements: Midwest Herpetological Symposium . 203 Advertisements . 204 New CHS Members This Month . 204 Cover: Smith’s black-headed snake, Tantilla hobartsmithi, Pinal County, Arizona. Photograph by: R. C. Clark, Dancing Snake Nature Photography. STAFF Membership in the CHS includes a subscription to the monthly Bulletin. Annual dues are: Individual Membership, $25.00; Editor: Michael A. Dloogatch --- [email protected] Family Membership, $28.00; Sustaining Membership, $50.00; Copy editor: Joan Moore Contributing Membership, $100.00; Institutional Membership, $38.00. Remittance must be made in U.S. funds. Subscribers 2017 CHS Board of Directors outside the U.S. must add $12.00 for postage. Send membership dues or address changes to: Chicago Herpetological Society, President: Rich Crowley Membership Secretary, 2430 N. Cannon Drive, Chicago, IL 60614. Vice-president: Jessica Wadleigh Treasurer: John Archer Manuscripts published in the Bulletin of the Chicago Herpeto- Recording Secretary: Gail Oomens logical Society are not peer reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • Projecting Climate Effects on Birds and Reptiles of the Southwestern United States
    Projecting Climate Effects on Birds and Reptiles of the Southwest ern United States Open-File Report 2014-1050 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover photo description clockwise from upper left: Virginia’s Warbler (Vermivora virginiae) photo credit to P. Dotson/Utah Division of Wildlife Resources; Desert Tortoise (Sonoran Population) (Gopherus agassizii) photo credit to Cecil Schwalbe/U.S. Geological Survey and University of Arizona; Pinyon Jay (Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus) photo credit to Dave Menke/U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; and Arizona Black Rattlesnake (Crotalus cerberus) photo credit to Erika Nowak/U.S. Geological Survey and Northern Arizona University. Projecting Climate Effects on Birds and Reptiles of the Southwestern United States By Charles van Riper III, James R. Hatten, J. Tom Giermakowski, David Mattson, Jennifer A. Holmes, Matthew J. Johnson, Erika M. Nowak, Kirsten Ironside, Michael Peters, Paul Heinrich, K. L. Cole, C. Truettner, and Cecil R. Schwalbe Open-File Report 2014–1050 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2014 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Suggested citation: van Riper, C., III., Hatten, J.R., Giermakowski, J.T., Mattson, D., Holmes, J.A., Johnson, M.J., Nowak, E.M., Ironside, K., Peters, M., Heinrich, P., Cole, K.L., Truettner, C., and Schwalbe, C.R., 2014, Projecting climate effec ts on birds and reptiles of the Southwestern United States: U.S.
    [Show full text]