New Acquisitions in Americana April 2021
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
GERMAN IMMIGRANTS, AFRICAN AMERICANS, and the RECONSTRUCTION of CITIZENSHIP, 1865-1877 DISSERTATION Presented In
NEW CITIZENS: GERMAN IMMIGRANTS, AFRICAN AMERICANS, AND THE RECONSTRUCTION OF CITIZENSHIP, 1865-1877 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Alison Clark Efford, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Doctoral Examination Committee: Professor John L. Brooke, Adviser Approved by Professor Mitchell Snay ____________________________ Adviser Professor Michael L. Benedict Department of History Graduate Program Professor Kevin Boyle ABSTRACT This work explores how German immigrants influenced the reshaping of American citizenship following the Civil War and emancipation. It takes a new approach to old questions: How did African American men achieve citizenship rights under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments? Why were those rights only inconsistently protected for over a century? German Americans had a distinctive effect on the outcome of Reconstruction because they contributed a significant number of votes to the ruling Republican Party, they remained sensitive to European events, and most of all, they were acutely conscious of their own status as new American citizens. Drawing on the rich yet largely untapped supply of German-language periodicals and correspondence in Missouri, Ohio, and Washington, D.C., I recover the debate over citizenship within the German-American public sphere and evaluate its national ramifications. Partisan, religious, and class differences colored how immigrants approached African American rights. Yet for all the divisions among German Americans, their collective response to the Revolutions of 1848 and the Franco-Prussian War and German unification in 1870 and 1871 left its mark on the opportunities and disappointments of Reconstruction. -
The Other Side of the Monument: Memory, Preservation, and the Battles of Franklin and Nashville
THE OTHER SIDE OF THE MONUMENT: MEMORY, PRESERVATION, AND THE BATTLES OF FRANKLIN AND NASHVILLE by JOE R. BAILEY B.S., Austin Peay State University, 2006 M.A., Austin Peay State University, 2008 AN ABSTRACT OF A DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2015 Abstract The thriving areas of development around the cities of Franklin and Nashville in Tennessee bear little evidence of the large battles that took place there during November and December, 1864. Pointing to modern development to explain the failed preservation of those battlefields, however, radically oversimplifies how those battlefields became relatively obscure. Instead, the major factor contributing to the lack of preservation of the Franklin and Nashville battlefields was a fractured collective memory of the two events; there was no unified narrative of the battles. For an extended period after the war, there was little effort to remember the Tennessee Campaign. Local citizens and veterans of the battles simply wanted to forget the horrific battles that haunted their memories. Furthermore, the United States government was not interested in saving the battlefields at Franklin and Nashville. Federal authorities, including the War Department and Congress, had grown tired of funding battlefields as national parks and could not be convinced that the two battlefields were worthy of preservation. Moreover, Southerners and Northerners remembered Franklin and Nashville in different ways, and historians mainly stressed Eastern Theater battles, failing to assign much significance to Franklin and Nashville. Throughout the 20th century, infrastructure development encroached on the battlefields and they continued to fade from public memory. -
Williamson County Historical Society Journal Article Titles 1970-2018
Williamson County Archives Williamson County Historical Society Journal: Article titles by issue Page 1 No. 1, Fall 1970 The Williamson County Historical Society by Campbell H. Brown The Courthouses of Williamson County by Herbert L. Harper Recollections of 78 Years in Franklin by Martin Tohrner General N. B. Forrest Cavalry Raid on Brentwood, Tennessee, March 24, 1863 by Buford Gotto The Order of Pale Faces by Virginia Gooch Watson The Franklin Treaty of 1830 by Stephen S. Lawrence Historic Moran Home: Enjoyed by Members of the Same Family for 111 Years by Virginia McDaniel Bowman No. 2, Spring 1971 The Crockett House by George R. Knox The Battle of Franklin by Marion Pearson Kinnard Memories of Sunny Side School by Lula Fain Major Mt. Zion Methodist Episcopal Church by Louise Gillespie Lynch Sumner’s Knob by John Weakley Covington The Tenth Tennessee’s “Battle Flag” by Campbell H. Brown No. 3, 1971-1972 The Edmondson Family by Howard Vallance Jones A Short History of Saint Philip Catholic Church by Valere B. Menefee Green Hill by Walter Stokes, Jr. Soldiers of the War of 1812 by Louise Gillespie Lynch First Inhabitants of Brentwood by Mary Sneed Jones Thomas Stuart by Dorothy Norman Carl The Presbyterian Church in Williamson County by Helen Sawyer Cook The Fates of Three Cousins by Thomas Vance Little Williamson County Archives Williamson County Historical Society Journal: Article titles by issue Page 2 No. 4, 1972-1973 Early Settlers of Williamson County by Helen Sawyer Cook Physicians of Williamson County, Tennessee, 1800-1832 by S. R. Bruesch 1850 Mortality Schedule by Louise Gillespie Lynch The Brown, Ervin, and McEwen Families of Fort Nashborough and Franklin by Dr. -
On the Rise and Progress of Popular Disaffection,” in Es- Says, Moral and Political, 2 Vols
Notes Introduction 1. Robert Southey, “On the Rise and Progress of Popular Disaffection,” in Es- says, Moral and Political, 2 vols. (1817; London: John Murray, 1832), II, 82. The identity of Junius remained a mystery, and even Edmund Burke was suspected. For an argument that he was Sir Philip Francis, see Alvar Ellegård, Who Was Junius? (The Hague, 1962). 2. Byron, “The Vision of Judgment” in Lord Byron: The Complete Poetical Works, ed. Jerome J. McGann and Barry Weller, 7 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980–92), VI, 309–45. 3. M. H. Abrams, Natural Supernaturalism: Tradition and Revolution in Ro- mantic Literature (New York: W. W. Norton, 1971), p. 13. 4. See Anne K. Mellor, English Romantic Irony (Cambridge: Harvard Univer- sity Press, 1980). 5. Jerome J. McGann, The Romantic Ideology: A Critical Investigation (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1983), pp. 23–24. 6. Jerome J. McGann, Towards a Literature of Knowledge (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989), p. 39. 7. McGann, Towards a Literature of Knowledge, p. 39. 8. McGann, “Literary Pragmatics and the Editorial Horizon,” in Devils and Angels: Textual Editing and Literary Theory, ed. Philip Cohen (Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia, 1991), pp. 1–21 (13). 9. Marilyn Butler, “Satire and the Images of Self in the Romantic Period: The Long Tradition of Hazlitt’s Liber Amoris,” in English Satire and the Satiric Tradition, ed. Claude Rawson (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984), 209–25 (209). 10. Stuart Curran, Poetic Form and British Romanticism (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986), pp. 12–13. 11. Gary Dyer, British Satire and the Politics of Style, 1789–1832 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997). -
J20 Redux.Pdf
JUCH (CARL WILHELM). - -- tr. See PHARMACOPOEA BORUSSICA. Pharmacopoea Borussica, oder Preussische Pharmacopoe. JUCH (HERMANN PAULUS). - -- praes. Diss. ... de empyemate, quarr ... submittit auctor J.C. Hennigk. Erfordiae (1748.) QP. 825/25. - -- resp. See STAHL (G.E.) praes. JUCHEM (CHRISTIANUS HENDRICUS VAN). - -- Diss. med de variolis, atque actione miasmatis variolosi. Lugd. Bat., 1755. QP. 1108/3. JUCHHOFF (RUDOLF). - -- Aus der Welt des Bibliothekars. Festschrift für Rudolf Juchhoff zum 65. Geburtstag. Hrsg. von K. Ohly und W. Krieg. Köln, 1961. .02(43) Juc. - -- Kölner Schule; Festgabe zum 60. Geburtstag von Rudolf Juchhoff ... Hrsg. von H. Corsten und G. Lohse. [Arb. a. d. Bibl. Lehrinst. d. Landes Nordrhein -Westfalen, Hft. 7.] Köln, 1957. .0204 Juc. - -- Sammelkatalog der biographischen und literarkritischen Werke zu englischen Schriftstellern des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts, 1830 -1958; Verzeichnis der Bestände in deutschen Bibliotheken. Unter Mitarbeit von H. Föhl zusammengestellt von R.J. Krefeld, n.d. Ref. .82016 Juc. JUCIUS (MICHAEL JAMES). - -- Personnel management. Rev. ed. 3rd pr. Chicago, 1951. 6583 .aa JUCKER (ERNST). - -- See KARRER (P.) and J. (E.) JUCKER (HANS). - -- Vom Verhältnis der Römer zur bildenden Kunst der Griechen. Frankfurt am Main [1950.] 07)1-11. 7(5q) 7C37 -3s) JUG. JUCKER- FLEETWOOD (ERIN ELVER). - -- Economic theory and policy in Finland, 1914 -1925. [Basle Centre for Econ. and Financial Res. Publ. Ser. B, No. 1.] Oxford [1958.1 .33(471) Juc. - -- Money and finance in Africa; the experience of Ghana, Morocco, Nigeria, the Rhodesias and Nyasaland, the Sudan, and Tunisia, from the establishment of their central banks until 1962. [Basle Centre for Econ. and Financial Res. Ser. B, No. -
I Never Heard Mrs Macaulay^ Was Supposed to Write Junius,S Nor Know Anything of Her Owning Those Papers
52 To SIR EDWARD WALPOLE 28 APRIL 1769 I never heard Mrs Macaulay^ was supposed to write Junius,s nor know anything of her owning those papers. I have heard they were written by a merchant, which is not very probable. In general I think opinions are divided between Lord George Sackville,6 Will. Burke,7 not Edmund, and Mclean.8 For myself, I think both the style and matter make it most probable that the first is the author— some circumstances however are against that opinion. The attack on Westons looks like the second, as one should suppose the author well acquainted with the Secretary's office; some persons too think the style resembles that of the occasional writer three years ago, who was certainly Will. Burke: but to me Junius is a more concise and better writer. I am not acquainted with either Mclean's style or parts. In short, you see I have told you what I don't know. Yours ever H.W. 4. Catherine Sawbridge (1731-91), m. 1 been considered a strong candidate (MANN (1760) George Macaulay; m. 2 (1778) vii. 165, 188, 247-8; Namier and Brooke William Graham; the historian and re ii. 467-8; Letters of Junius, ed. C. W. publican, of whom Dr Johnson declared, Everett, 1927, pp. 382-7), but T. H. Bow 'To endeavour to make her ridiculous, is yer (op. cit. p. xix) concludes that 'the like blacking the chimney' (Boswell's identity of Junius remains unsettled.' Life of Johnson, ed. G. B. Hill and F. L. -
“The Wisest Radical of All”: Reelection (September-November, 1864)
Chapter Thirty-four “The Wisest Radical of All”: Reelection (September-November, 1864) The political tide began turning on August 29 when the Democratic national convention met in Chicago, where Peace Democrats were unwilling to remain in the background. Lincoln had accurately predicted that the delegates “must nominate a Peace Democrat on a war platform, or a War Democrat on a peace platform; and I personally can’t say that I care much which they do.”1 The convention took the latter course, nominating George McClellan for president and adopting a platform which declared the war “four years of failure” and demanded that “immediate efforts be made for a cessation of hostilities, with a view to an ultimate convention of the states, or other peaceable means, to the end that, at the earliest practicable moment, peace may be restored on the basis of the Federal Union of the States.” This “peace plank,” the handiwork of Clement L. Vallandigham, implicitly rejected Lincoln’s Niagara Manifesto; the Democrats would require only union as a condition for peace, whereas the Republicans insisted on union and emancipation. The platform also called for the restoration of “the rights of the States 1 Noah Brooks, Washington, D.C., in Lincoln’s Time, ed. Herbert Mitgang (1895; Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1971), 164. 3726 Michael Burlingame – Abraham Lincoln: A Life – Vol. 2, Chapter 34 unimpaired,” which implied the preservation of slavery.2 As McClellan’s running mate, the delegates chose Ohio Congressman George Pendleton, a thoroughgoing opponent of the war who had voted against supplies for the army. As the nation waited day after day to see how McClellan would react, Lincoln wittily opined that Little Mac “must be intrenching.” More seriously, he added that the general “doesn’t know yet whether he will accept or decline. -
Nathaniel Jasper Smith Biographical Sketch (Father of Rosa Delphine “Della” Waggoner)
Nathaniel Jasper Smith Biographical Sketch (Father of Rosa Delphine “Della” Waggoner) Nathaniel Jasper Smith was born March 18411 in Rushville, Schuyler Co, Illinois 2. He was the fourth of 11 children of Thomas Smith and Nancy Vice Smith.3 We know very little about his younger years, however, we do know that at age 21 he was a farmer in Johnson Township, Scotland County, Missouri. The Civil War came to Northeast Missouri quickly with the Battle of Athens on August 5, 1861, 4 months after war was declared. Nathaniel was just 20 years old when this battle took place in the adjacent county to where he and his family lived and was about 30 to 40 miles from their farm. As a result of this battle, the 21st Missouri Volunteer Infantry Regiment was formed. Nathaniel’s older brother, John C. Smith4, served as one of the original officers of Company H. His younger brother, Thomas Benton Smith, enlisted 8 months later. Then on Nov. 14, 1862, 7 months after Thomas, Nathaniel enlisted in the Union Army. He also was assigned to Company H of the 21st Missouri Volunteer Infantry Regiment and he was “Mustered” in on Dec. 23, 1962 at Benton Barracks5, St. Louis, MO. by Colonel Benjamin Bonneville. He was single when he enlisted, stood 5’ 7”, had brown hair and dark gray eyes. The 21st Regiment fought in at least 25 major battles13 in 6 states (Missouri, Tennessee, Mississippi, Alabama, Kentucky and Louisiana). At the Battle of Pleasant Hill12, Louisiana on April 9, 1864, the largest Civil War battle west of the Mississippi River, Nathaniel was seriously wounded and spent several weeks in the hospital in Memphis, TN. -
IMLAY Nina E. Infant D. 18 May 1899 at Northport; Spinal Meningitis; Daughter of Charles Imlay of Northport INGALLS John V
IMLAY Nina E. infant d. 18 May 1899 at Northport; spinal meningitis; daughter of Charles Imlay of Northport INGALLS John V. d. 16August 1900 at Las Vegas, New Mexico; throat trouble; [interment at Atchinson, Kansas]; “the history of his life was that of a poor boy who arose to name and fame through unremitting toil”; [native of Middleton, Massachusetts, b. 29 December 1833; moved to Kansas in 1858 and soon became involved in Kansas politics; newspaper editor in Atchinson, Kansas]; U. S. Senator [from Kansas 1873-1891 and President ProTem of the U. S. Senate 1887-1891]; resident of Atcinson, Kansas INGELOW Jean 76 years d. 20 July 1897 at London, England; “distinguished poet and novelist ... has a wide popularity in the United States”; native of Boston, England; born 1820 INGERSOLL Col. Robert G. d. 21 July 1899 at Dobb’s Ferry, N. Y.; apoplexy; funeral at Dobb’s Ferry at which his various writings were read; cremation at Fresh Pond, L. I.; unnamed widow survives; father of Mrs. Walston H. Brown and Maude Ingersoll; native of Dresden, N. Y. (b. 1833), son of a Congregationalist minister; “noted infidel lecturer”; grew up in Illinois; served in the Civil War as colonel of the 11th Illinois; leading Republican party political figure; “his fame came through his lectures and writings antagonizing the Christian faith” INGRAHAM Winifred 17 years d. 7 August 1893 at Lattingtown; daughter of H. M. H. Ingraham INMAN Robert drowned 26 August 1895 in collision of his yacht Adelaide and the steamer Pereus in New York Harbor; all others aboard the yacht at the time of the collision were rescued; body washed ashore at South Beach, Staten Island; “Mr. -
The Vindicators of Shakespeare
THE VINDICATORS OF SHAKESPEARE A REPLY TO CRITICS «8> TOGETHER WITH SOME REMARKS ON DR. WALLACE'S "NEW SHAKESPEARE DISCOVERIES." BY G. G. GREENWOOD, M.P. AUTHOR OF " THE SHAKESPEARE PROBLEM RESTATED " " are While these censors 'twould be sin to spare. " While such are critics why should I forbear ? Byron. LONDON : SWEETING and Co. 4 DYERS BUILDINGS HOLBORN BARS E.C. PRINTED BY PAGE AND THOMAS LTD. HOLBORN BARS E.C. TABLE OF CONTENTS. PART I. THE VINDICATORS OF SHAKESPEARE. PAGE THE NINETEENTH CENTURY AND AFTER - - 12 - - - SIR TITTLEBAT TOPLOFTY . 14 - - - THE FOLIO OF 1640 ! 15 " THE INTRODUCTION TO A MIDSUMMER NIGHT'S " - - - - - DREAM ! 20 VISOR OF WINCOT - - - - - 22 AUGUSTIN NICOLAS 23 MY COURTEOUS CRITIC - - - -24 LADY SOUTHAMPTON'S ACCOUNT - - 28 " " - THE DEFAMERS OF SHAKESPEARE ! 32 " " " " GENIUS AND ENVIRONMENT - - 37 THE CASE OF BURNS - - - "38 THE CASE OF BUNYAN - - - 41 THE CASE OF PLAUTUS - - - "44 " " " " SHAKSPERE OR SHAKESPEARE - 50 THE FIRST FOLIO - - - 5 2 MANY PENS CONTRIBUTED TO THE FOLIO - 56 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS. PAGE the burbages and the earl of pembroke - 59 chettle's supposed allusion - - 65 " " the meaning of quality - - 68 " " the parnassus plays - - - 70 " " imaginary stratford references - 73 shakespeare and sport 76 the two stratfordian schools - - 78 lord campbell on shakespeare's law - 80 mrs. stopes on shakspere's aunts and shak- - - spere's law - - 91 miss marie corelli on shakspere's marriage LICENCE ----- 94 CANON BEECHING - - - - * 97 THE CANON OBJECTS TO "AUTHORITY" - 100 " " SHAKSPERE'S SCRIPTS ... 102 " " INSANITARY STRATFORD - - - 104 JONSON'S ODE TO BACON - - - 106 SHAKSPERE AND RICHARD FIELD - - I08 " " PARNASSUS AGAIN .... IIX DAVIES OF HEREFORD - - - - m THE CASE OF TERENCE - - - - 115 SHAKSPERE AND LORD SOUTHAMPTON - - Il6 THE JONSONIAN RIDDLE - - - - Il8 " " WHAT IS A LIE ? - - - - 119 HENSLOWE'S DIARY ... -
A Pilgrim of Historiography: Byron and the Discourses of History in Early Nineteenth-Century Britain
A Pilgrim of Historiography – Ivan Pregnolato A Pilgrim of Historiography: Byron and the Discourses of History in Early Nineteenth-Century Britain Ivan Pregnolato, BA, MA Thesis Submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2015 Page 1 of 363 A Pilgrim of Historiography – Ivan Pregnolato Abstract This thesis aims to understand Byron’s œuvre in relation to the discourses of history in early nineteenth-century Britain. As a contribution to the historicist critical approaches of the past decades, my dissertation discusses the different ideas surrounding the concept of ‘history’ in the first two decades of the 1800s, a period marked by change. As shown, these discourses of history were notorious for their heterogeneity and, by analysing Byron’s poetry and letters, it becomes evident that Byron engaged with these multiple interpretations as well. Roughly, three types of discourses of history are discussed below: the classical knowledge which was perpetuated in the educational system of the time and discussed in travelogues; the whig interpretation of history and the teleological concept of ‘liberty’ through time; and the idea of powerful forces that act ‘behind’ history, such as economics and the inseparability of power embedded in creating historical narratives. This thesis concludes that is impossible to speak of a single Byronic historical narrative and, rather, argues that Byron’s texts espouse pluralistic conceptualisations of history. Page 2 of 363 A Pilgrim of Historiography – Ivan Pregnolato To my mother ‘A fila anda…’ Page 3 of 363 A Pilgrim of Historiography – Ivan Pregnolato Acknowledgements Several people have helped me in the years that it has taken to write this thesis. -
Before Google, Why We Need a Registry and Lookup Archie Bind
Revolutionary Ideas and the People who Came Together to Accomplish Them 1 History of the Internet Page 2 History of the US Interstate Highway System Page 15 History of the Transcontinental Railroad Page 21 Before Google, why we need a registry and lookup Archie Bind Gopher BackRub Revolutionary Ideas and the People who Came Together to Accomplish Them 2 An anecdotal history of the people and communities that brought about the Internet and the Web1 (Last updated 1 September 2009) A Brief History of the Internet by Walt Howe is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. Based on a work at www.walthowe.com. The Internet was the result of some visionary thinking by people in the early 1960s who saw great potential value in allowing computers to share information on research and development in scientific and military fields. J.C.R. Licklider of MIT, first proposed a global network of computers in 1962, and moved over to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) in late 1962 to head the work to develop it. Leonard Kleinrock of MIT and later UCLA developed the theory of packet switching, which was to form the basis of Internet connections. Lawrence Roberts of MIT connected a Massachusetts computer with a California computer in 1965 over dial-up telephone lines. It showed the feasibility of wide area networking, but also showed that the telephone line's circuit switching was inadequate. Kleinrock's packet switching theory was confirmed. Roberts moved over to DARPA in 1966 and developed his plan for ARPANET.