DOCSLIB.ORG

084622/EU XXIV. GP Eingelangt Am 12/06/12

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
084622/EU XXIV. GP Eingelangt Am 12/06/12 084622/EU XXIV. GP Eingelangt am 12/06/12 COUNCIL OF Brussels, 14 March 2012 THE EUROPEAN UNION 7617/12 ADD 1 AVIATION 44 COVER NOTE from: Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director date of receipt: 8 March 2012 to: Mr Uwe CORSEPIUS, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union No Cion doc.: SWD(2012) 38 final Subject: COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER ACCOMPANYING THE REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL: EUROPEAN UNION SAFA PROGRAMME (Safety Assessment of Foreign Aircraft) Aggregated Information Report (01 January 2010 to 31 December 2010) Delegations will find attached the Commission document SWD(2012) 38 final. ________________________ Encl.: SWD(2012) 38 final 7617/12 ADD 1 ML/mkl 1 DG C I C EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 7.3.2012 SWD(2012) 38 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER ACCOMPANYING THE REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL: EUROPEAN UNION SAFA PROGRAMME (Safety Assessment of Foreign Aircraft) Aggregated Information Report (01 January 2010 to 31 December 2010) {COM(2012) 91 final} EN EN COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER ACCOMPANYING THE REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL: EUROPEAN UNION SAFA PROGRAMME (Safety Assessment of Foreign Aircraft) Aggregated Information Report (01 January 2010 to 31 December 2010) APPENDIX A – DATA COLLECTION BY PARTICIPATING STATES Average no. of inspected No. Member State No. Inspections No. Findings items/inspection EU Member States 1. Austria 463 1048 40.27 2. Belgium 147 171 30.29 3. Bulgaria 117 55 43.90 4. Cyprus 89 45 41.51 5. Czech Republic 181 145 43.73 6. Denmark 69 48 41.87 7. Estonia 41 14 25.98 8. Finland 116 71 36.77 9. France 2691 3326 34.95 10. Germany 1444 991 41.59 11. Greece 420 154 23.63 12. Hungary 22 46 31.64 13. Ireland 70 79 47.41 14. Italy 823 1033 34.91 15. Latvia 54 31 36.69 16. Lithuania 32 7 45.00 17. Luxembourg 58 18 32.45 18. Malta 10 7 39.30 19. Netherlands 258 482 39.66 20. Poland 166 199 40.20 21. Portugal 195 48 40.75 22. Romania 92 33 31.65 23. Slovak Republic 52 101 40.31 24. Slovenia 45 29 38.53 25. Spain 931 1561 39.80 EN 2 EN 26. Sweden 104 54 42.68 27. United Kingdom 1108 322 39.85 Total 9798 10118 37.54 Average no. of inspected No. Member State No. Inspections No. Findings items/inspection Non-EU ECAC SAFA Participating States 1. Albania 14 5 43.29 2. Armenia 39 13 47.44 3. Azerbaijan 11 1 43.82 4. Bosnia and Herzegovina 12 14 38.25 5. Croatia 123 37 33.06 6. Georgia 15 4 32.13 7. Iceland 18 19 38.67 8. Moldova 12 7 34.67 9. Monaco 6 3 46.17 10. Norway 1 3 54.00 11. Serbia 140 91 33.81 12. Switzerland 76 50 40.91 The Former Yugoslav 13. 358 81 37.13 Republic of Macedonia 14. Turkey 1046 528 35.92 15. Ukraine 34 45 48.38 Total 1905 901 36.61 EN 3 EN APPENDIX B - List of States/Territories of Inspected Operators (Listed in alphabetical order) Operator State No. of Inspections Percentage (*) Afghanistan 7 0.06% Albania 32 0.27% Algeria 64 0.55% Angola 61 0.52% Anguilla 8 0.07% Antigua and Barbuda 6 0.05% Argentina 6 0.05% Armenia 32 0.27% Aruba 7 0.06% Australia 21 0.18% Austria 334 2.85% Azerbaijan 44 0.38% Bahrain 23 0.20% Bangladesh 2 0.02% Belarus 74 0.63% Belgium 205 1.75% Bermuda 34 0.29% Bolivia 6 0.05% Bosnia and Herzegovina 21 0.18% Brazil 21 0.18% British Virgin Islands 1 0.01% Brunei Darussalam 1 0.01% Bulgaria 137 1.17% Burkina Faso 15 0.13% Cape Verde 14 0.12% Canada 81 0.69% Cayman Islands 13 0.11% Chad 1 0.01% Chile 11 0.09% China 92 0.79% Colombia 5 0.04% Comoros 29 0.25% Côte d'Ivoire 4 0.03% Croatia 68 0.58% Cuba 12 0.10% Cyprus 57 0.49% Czech Republic 162 1.38% Denmark 165 1.41% Dominican Republic 3 0.03% Ecuador 3 0.03% Egypt 237 2.03% Estonia 33 0.28% Ethiopia 22 0.19% Finland 122 1.04% EN 4 EN Operator State No. of Inspections Percentage (*) France 231 1.97% Gabon 11 0.09% Georgia 46 0.39% Germany 829 7.08% Ghana 21 0.18% Greece 154 1.32% Hong Kong 27 0.23% Hungary 177 1.51% Iceland 64 0.55% India 31 0.26% Indonesia 4 0.03% Iran 85 0.73% Ireland 397 3.39% Isle of Man 28 0.24% Israel 134 1.15% Italy 269 2.30% Japan 19 0.16% Jordan 73 0.62% Kazakhstan 38 0.32% Kenya 15 0.13% Korea / South Korea 32 0.27% Kuwait 33 0.28% Latvia 110 0.94% Lebanon 53 0.45% Libya 73 0.62% Lithuania 51 0.44% Luxembourg 89 0.76% The former Yugoslav Republic of 15 0.13% Macedonia Madagascar 39 0.33% Malaysia 15 0.13% Mali 4 0.03% Malta 62 0.53% Mauritania 16 0.14% Mauritius 13 0.11% Mexico 21 0.18% Moldova 42 0.36% Monaco 5 0.04% Mongolia 2 0.02% Montenegro 41 0.35% Montserrat 2 0.02% Morocco 174 1.49% Namibia 2 0.02% Netherlands 260 2.22% Netherlands Antilles 14 0.12% New Zealand 11 0.09% Nigeria 6 0.05% EN 5 EN Operator State No. of Inspections Percentage (*) Norway 106 0.91% Oman 8 0.07% Pakistan 46 0.39% Peru 1 0.01% Poland 139 1.19% Portugal 284 2.43% Qatar 59 0.50% Romania 168 1.44% Russian Federation 851 7.27% Saint Vincent / Grenadines 8 0.07% San Marino 1 0.01% Saudi Arabia 37 0.32% Serbia 70 0.60% Seychelles 8 0.07% Singapore 29 0.25% Slovakia 40 0.34% Slovenia 76 0.65% South Africa 16 0.14% Spain 390 3.33% Sri Lanka 14 0.12% Suriname 6 0.05% Sweden 247 2.11% Switzerland 298 2.55% Syrian Arab Republic (Syria) 20 0.17% Tajikistan 4 0.03% Taiwan (Republic of China) 24 0.21% Thailand 24 0.21% Tunisia 191 1.63% Turkey 586 5.01% Turkmenistan 9 0.08% Ukraine 287 2.45% United Arab Emirates 143 1.22% United Kingdom 802 6.85% United States of America 495 4.23% Uruguay 1 0.01% Uzbekistan 26 0.22% Vanuatu 8 0.07% Venezuela 10 0.09% Viet Nam 8 0.07% Yemen 15 0.13% Zimbabwe 14 0.12% (*) = number of inspections in relation to total number of inspections (%) conducted during the time period being considered in this report EN 6 EN – As mentioned earlier there is no discrimination between operators certified in the 44 EU / ECAC States (indicated in bold) and operators certified in the other non-European States. The fact that inspections on ECAC operators account for almost two thirds of the total number of inspections is a direct consequence of the fact that a vast portion of European air traffic is performed by operators from those states. EN 7 EN – APPENDIX C - Aircraft types inspected (by manufacturer) (Listed in alphabetical order) Large airliners (over 100 seats) No. Aircraft Manufacturer 1. AIRBUS 2. ANTONOV 3. BOEING 4. BRITISH AEROSPACE 5. EMBRAER 6. FOKKER 7. ILYUSHIN 8. LOCKHEED 9. MCDONNELL DOUGLAS (now part of the Boeing Company) 10. TUPOLEV 11. YAKOVLEV Regional airliners (19-99 seats) No. Aircraft Manufacturer 1. ANTONOV 2. AVIONS DE TRANSPORT RÉGIONAL (ATR) 3. BOMBARDIER AEROSPACE 4. BRITISH AEROSPACE 5. CONVAIR 6. DORNIER 7. EMBRAER 8. FAIRCHILD 9. FOKKER 10. LET 11. LOCKHEED 12. SAAB 13. YAKOVLEV EN 8 EN Commuter, business and general aviation aeroplanes No. Aircraft Manufacturer 1. BEECH 2. BOMBARDIER AEROSPACE 3. BRITTEN-NORMAN 4. CESSNA 5. CIRRUS AIRCRAFT CORPORATION 6. DASSAULT 7. DIAMOND AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIES 8. DORNIER 9. FAIRCHILD 10. GULFSTREAM 11. ISRAEL AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIES 12. PIAGGIO 13. PILATUS AIRCRAFT 14. PIPER 15. RAYTHEON 16. ROCKWELL 17. SHORT BROTHERS 18. SOCATA Helicopters No. Aircraft Manufacturer 1. AGUSTA 2. AEROSPATIALE 3. BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON 4. EUROCOPTER 5. KAMOV OKB 6. MIL HELICOPTERS 7. ROBINSON HELICOPTER COMPANY 8. SIKORSKY The distribution of SAFA inspections by aircraft manufacturers is in line with the volume of traffic performed with the respective types. In 2010, inspections covered also general aviation and helicopter operations, but the overall majority concentrated on commercial operations with aeroplanes. EN 9 EN APPENDIX D – Operators Inspected (Listed in alphabetical order) Code Total NAME OPERATOR Operator Name State Operator Inspections 223 FLIGHT UNIT STATE AIRLINE CHD Russian Federation 1 224TH FLIGHT UNIT TTF Russian Federation 5 247 JET LTD TWF United Kingdom 6 2nd SVERDLOVSK AIR ENTERPRISE UKU Russian Federation 1 ABC BEDARFSFLUG GMBH FTY Austria 2 ABELAG AVIATION AAB Belgium 8 ABS JETS ABP Czech Republic 6 AC CHALLENGE AERO LLC CHG Ukraine 2 ACASS CANADA LTD. 6NH Canada 1 ACG AIR CARGO GERMANY ACX Germany 5 ACH HAMBURG GMBH 7AC Germany 3 ACM AIR CHARTER GMBH BVR Germany 5 ACM AVIATION INC. BJT United States of America 1 ACROPOLIS AVIATION LTD CRV United Kingdom 1 ACT HAVAYOLLARI AS RUN Turkey 6 AD ASTRA EXECUTIVE CHARTER SP. ADC Poland 2 ADRIA AIRWAYS ADR Slovenia 46 ADVANCE AIRLUFTFAHRTGESELL. 6HZ Germany 3 ADVANCED AIR MANAGEMENT INC.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Master Thesis
    Master Thesis Sustainability reporting in the airline industry: a comparative case study analysis of four selected European passenger airlines and their countries of registration on the basis of the airlines’ annual reports and sustainability report from 2018 Student: Laura Vani Kesore (s2015323) [email protected] Study program: Public Administration M.Sc. First Supervisor: Prof. Dr. René Torenvlied [email protected] Second Supervisor: Dr. Ringo Ossewaarde [email protected] Master Thesis 24 August 2020 University of Twente, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences Drienerlolaan 5 7522 NB Enschede, NL Abstract Sustainability reporting for airlines is becoming more and more important. The driving forces are the external and internal pressures, such as demand from the public and society, from governments, stakeholders and shareholders, as well as from NGOs, activists, and the industry- intern economic competition between the airlines. Within the scope of this research, the main focus was on the research question: How can the variation in the claims of sustainable measures reported in the 2018 annual reports and sustainability reports by four different European airlines be explained from the characteristics of the airlines and of the countries in which the airlines are registered?. The ecosystem for the conducted analyses consists of four airlines from four different countries in the European Union. Seven sustainability parameters were chosen in order to objectively analyze the sustainability reporting of the airlines and of their countries of registrations. The parameters are: (I) alternative fuel, (II) CORSIA, (III) aviation tax, (IV) aircraft age, (V) aircraft design, (VI) Dow Jones Sustainability Index, and (VII) atmosfair Airline Index.
    [Show full text]
  • Liste-Exploitants-Aeronefs.Pdf
    EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, XXX C(2009) XXX final COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) EN EN COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC1, and in particular Article 18a(3)(a) thereof, Whereas: (1) Directive 2003/87/EC, as amended by Directive 2008/101/EC2, includes aviation activities within the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community (hereinafter the "Community scheme"). (2) In order to reduce the administrative burden on aircraft operators, Directive 2003/87/EC provides for one Member State to be responsible for each aircraft operator. Article 18a(1) and (2) of Directive 2003/87/EC contains the provisions governing the assignment of each aircraft operator to its administering Member State. The list of aircraft operators and their administering Member States (hereinafter "the list") should ensure that each operator knows which Member State it will be regulated by and that Member States are clear on which operators they should regulate.
    [Show full text]
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • UPDATED ON: 18-03-2019 STATION AIRLINE IATA CODE AWB Prefix ON-LINE CARGO HANDLING FREIGHTER RAMP HANDLING RAMP LINEHAUL IMPORT
    WFS CARGO - CUSTOMERS LIST DENMARK - CPH SERVICES UPDATED ON: 18-03-2019 IATA AWB CARGO FREIGHTER RAMP RAMP IMPORT STATION AIRLINE ON-LINE GSA TRUCKING TERMINAL CODE Prefix HANDLING HANDLING LINEHAUL EXPORT CPH AMERICAN AIRLINES AA 001 X E NAL WALLENBORN HAL 1 CPH DELTA AIRLINES DL 006 X X I/E PROACTIVE WALLENBORN HAL1 CPH AIR CANADA AC 014 X X X I/E HWF DK WALLENBORN HAL 1 CPH UNITED AIRLINES UA 016 X I/E NORDIC GSA WALLENBORN HAL1 CPH LUFTHANSA LH 020 X X I/E LUFTHANSA CARGO WALLENBORN HAL1 CPH US AIRWAYS US 037 X I/E NORDIC GSA WALLENBORN HAL1 CPH DRAGON AIR XH 043 X I NORDIC GSA WALLENBORN HAL1 CPH AEROLINEAS ARGENTINAS AR 044 X E CARGOCARE WALLENBORN HAL1 CPH LAN CHILE - LINEA AEREA LA 045 X E KALES WALLENBORN HAL1 CPH TAP TP 047 X X x I/E SCANPARTNER WALLENBORN HAL1 CPH AER LINGUS EI 053 X I/E NORDIC GSA N/A HAL1 CPH AIR France AF 057 X X I/E KL/AF KIM JOHANSEN HAL2 CPH AIR SEYCHELLES HM 061 X E NORDIC GSA WALLENBORN HAL1 CPH CZECH AIRLINES OK 064 X X I/E AviationPlus VARIOUS HAL1 CPH SAUDI AIRLINES CARGO SV 065 X I/E AviationPlus VARIOUS HAL1 CPH ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES ET 071 X E KALES WALLENBORN HAL1 CPH GULF AIR GF 072 X E KALES WALLENBORN HAL1 CPH KLM KL 074 X X I/E KL/AF JDR HAL2 CPH IBERIA IB 075 X X I/E UNIVERSAL GSA WALLENBORN HAL1 CPH MIDDLE EAST AIRLINES ME 076 X X E UNIVERSAL GSA WALLENBORN HAL1 CPH EGYPTAIR MS 077 X E HWF DK WALLENBORN HAL1 CPH BRUSSELS AIRLINES SN 020 X X I/E LUFTHANSA CARGO JDR HAL1 CPH SOUTH AFRICAN AIRWAYS SA 083 X E CARGOCARE WALLENBORN HAL1 CPH AIR NEW ZEALAND NZ 086 X E KALES WALLENBORN HAL1 CPH AIR
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Best Practices for Commercial Operators
    OPERATIONS IN AIRSPACE CLASS E IN GERMANY BELOW FL100 RECOMMENDED BEST PRACTICES FOR COMMERCIAL OPERATORS The following best practices have been developed by flight safety officers and experts to enhance the safety of operations in airspace Class E below FL100 to prevent collisions between controlled and uncontrolled aircraft in a mixed traffic environment. Recommendations for training departments and pilots • IMPROVE AIRSPACE AWARENESS Train pilots to be aware of shortfalls in the existing airspace structure – annual training and NOT only by bulletin using two components: o Generic briefing on airspace Class E in Germany o Dedicated airport briefing documents o Include risk and threats in unprotected airspace in individual departure and arrival briefing • OPERATING RECOMMENDATIONS o FLY DEFENSIVELY! o Maintain Minimum Clean Airspeed or as slow as reasonable o Request to use protected airspace – minimise time in airspace Class E and refuse shortcuts if necessary. Most standard departures and approaches/transitions will facilitate this. o Descend according to airspace structure on arrival. Steep/expedited climb through airspace Class E on departure. o Consider airspace structure for engine out procedures o Consider delaying take-off if conflict with other aircraft is anticipated • USE OF AUTOMATION IN AIRSPACE CLASS ECHO o Minimise visual approaches – they require additional attention and increase flight time in unprotected airspace o Maximise lookout capacity through use of automation (FMS/task sharing) • SEE AND AVOID o Maximise lookout
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Review 2014-2015
    The Voice for Business Aviation in Europe Annual Review 2014-2015 Business Aviation in Europe: State of the Industry 2015 Done in collaboration with www.wingx-advance.com www.amstatcorp.com www.eurocontrol.int CONTENTS 03 Introduction 04 Overview • What is Business Aviation? • Sub-divisions of the Definition 05 The European Business Aviation Association • EBAA Representativeness of the Business Aviation Industry • EBAA Membership 1996-2014 07 State of the Industry • Economic Outlook 08 • Traffic Analysis • The European Fleet 09 • Activity Trends by Aircraft Types 10 • Business Aviation Airports 11 • Business Aviation and Safety 12 A Challenging Industry • Challenges from the Inside 1. Means of Booking a Business Aviation Flight 2. Positioning Flights 13 3. Fleet Growth Vs Traffic • Challenges from the Outside 1. Fuel Prices 14 2. Route Charges 15 3. Taxes Revenue per Flight Indicator 16 Looking Ahead: Projects for 2015 • Description of Projects 18 EBAA Members (as of 1 April 2015) 2 INTRODUCTION In our last annual review, looking back at 2013, other sub-sectors were worse off than in 2013 we concluded that 2014 would be a defining (cargo was -0.5%, and charters plummeted moment for Business Aviation. In the first half at -9%). While times remain challenging for all of the year, we saw four consecutive months of forms of transport, we shouldn’t forget that in growth – a breath of fresh air following the years many ways, Business Aviation has fared, and characterised by recession. We were hoping continues to fare, better than most of its air to see that the economic storm was over so transport peers.
    [Show full text]
  • Autoritatea Aeronautică Civilă Română ______PART-MG Evaluare Ediţie Nr
    Autoritatea Aeronautică Civilă Română _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PART-MG Evaluare Ediţie Nr. Organizaţia Adresa Telefon / Fax Tipul aeronavei navigabilitate Autorizaţia iniţială/revizie No. Organisation Adress Phone / Fax Aircraft type Airworthiness Authorisation Issue review initial/revision 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 COMPANIA Calea Bucureştilor Tel A318/ 319/ 320/ 321 (CFM 56) DA/YES NAŢIONALĂ DE Nr. 224 F (021) 201 3370 B737- 300/400/500 (CFM 56) DA/YES Revizia 5 1 TRANSPORTURI Oraş Otopeni RO.MG.001 Fax B737- 600/700/800/900 (CFM56 DA/YES 26.11.2007/08.04.2019 AERIENE ROMÂNE Judeţul Ilfov (021) 201 4989 ATR 42/72 (PWc 120) DA/YES TAROM S.A. ROMÂNIA Tel Ion Ionescu de la Brad nr 15 DA/YES Revizia 11 CARPATAIR (0256) 277905 FOKKER 70/100 2 Timisoara. Jud. Timis NU/NO RO.MG.003 26.11.2007/10.10.2019 S.A. Fax Embraer ERJ-190 ROMÂNIA (0256) 306 962 Şos. Cristianului Tel DA/YES COBREX TRANS nr. 26, cod 2200 (0268) 472 537 SA 365N1 Revizia 9 3 DA/YES RO.MG.004 S.R.L. Braşov Fax B737- 300/400/500 (CFM 56) 24.12.2007/20.08.2019 ROMÂNIA (0268) 476 147 Gulfstream G200 DA/YES Calea Bucureştilor Tel AGUSTA AW139 DA/YES ION ŢIRIAC AIR nr. 224G, oraş Otopeni (021350 50 41 Revizia 11 4 A109E (PW 206/207) DA/YES RO.MG.005 S.A. Judeţul Ilfov Fax 26.02.2008/ 13.02.2019 GLOBAL 5000 DA/YES ROMÂNIA (021) 204 22 24 EMBRAER EMB 505 DA/YES Şos. Bucureşti-Ploieşti Tel A.A.C.R.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of Transportation Federal
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ORDER TRANSPORTATION JO 7340.2E FEDERAL AVIATION Effective Date: ADMINISTRATION July 24, 2014 Air Traffic Organization Policy Subject: Contractions Includes Change 1 dated 11/13/14 https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/CNT/3-3.HTM A 3- Company Country Telephony Ltr AAA AVICON AVIATION CONSULTANTS & AGENTS PAKISTAN AAB ABELAG AVIATION BELGIUM ABG AAC ARMY AIR CORPS UNITED KINGDOM ARMYAIR AAD MANN AIR LTD (T/A AMBASSADOR) UNITED KINGDOM AMBASSADOR AAE EXPRESS AIR, INC. (PHOENIX, AZ) UNITED STATES ARIZONA AAF AIGLE AZUR FRANCE AIGLE AZUR AAG ATLANTIC FLIGHT TRAINING LTD. UNITED KINGDOM ATLANTIC AAH AEKO KULA, INC D/B/A ALOHA AIR CARGO (HONOLULU, UNITED STATES ALOHA HI) AAI AIR AURORA, INC. (SUGAR GROVE, IL) UNITED STATES BOREALIS AAJ ALFA AIRLINES CO., LTD SUDAN ALFA SUDAN AAK ALASKA ISLAND AIR, INC. (ANCHORAGE, AK) UNITED STATES ALASKA ISLAND AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES INC. UNITED STATES AMERICAN AAM AIM AIR REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AIM AIR AAN AMSTERDAM AIRLINES B.V. NETHERLANDS AMSTEL AAO ADMINISTRACION AERONAUTICA INTERNACIONAL, S.A. MEXICO AEROINTER DE C.V. AAP ARABASCO AIR SERVICES SAUDI ARABIA ARABASCO AAQ ASIA ATLANTIC AIRLINES CO., LTD THAILAND ASIA ATLANTIC AAR ASIANA AIRLINES REPUBLIC OF KOREA ASIANA AAS ASKARI AVIATION (PVT) LTD PAKISTAN AL-AAS AAT AIR CENTRAL ASIA KYRGYZSTAN AAU AEROPA S.R.L. ITALY AAV ASTRO AIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. PHILIPPINES ASTRO-PHIL AAW AFRICAN AIRLINES CORPORATION LIBYA AFRIQIYAH AAX ADVANCE AVIATION CO., LTD THAILAND ADVANCE AVIATION AAY ALLEGIANT AIR, INC. (FRESNO, CA) UNITED STATES ALLEGIANT AAZ AEOLUS AIR LIMITED GAMBIA AEOLUS ABA AERO-BETA GMBH & CO., STUTTGART GERMANY AEROBETA ABB AFRICAN BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATIONS DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF AFRICAN BUSINESS THE CONGO ABC ABC WORLD AIRWAYS GUIDE ABD AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC ICELAND ATLANTA ABE ABAN AIR IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC ABAN OF) ABF SCANWINGS OY, FINLAND FINLAND SKYWINGS ABG ABAKAN-AVIA RUSSIAN FEDERATION ABAKAN-AVIA ABH HOKURIKU-KOUKUU CO., LTD JAPAN ABI ALBA-AIR AVIACION, S.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Flying Blind
    VAN ZORGE REPORT — FEBRUARY 8, 2007 AVIATION Flying blind s the top executives from nearly every major Indonesian airline gathered THE MEETING OF AIRLINE EXECUTIVE WAS around a table at the ministry of transportation in mid-January, a TENSE. A general feeling of irritability filled the air. The group rarely meets and certainly not on such short notice—a combination that led to a somewhat tense atmosphere, one executive at the meeting told the Report. Following the January 1 Adam Air crash, the country’s beleaguered THEY FELT IT WAS UNNECESSARY DESPITE transportation minister, Hatta Radjasa, had called the meeting to discuss the THE RECENT CRASH. country’s aviation safety procedures, which had fallen under heavy scrutiny in the wake of the recent disaster. “Some of them were grumbling,” the executive said. “They said that they knew perfectly well the government’s aviation safety procedures, and they didn’t need reminding.” Indeed, many of those aviation executives certainly have a very professional HOWEVER, ACCUSATIONS ARE RIFE THAT attitude toward air safety. But since the Adam Air tragedy, accusations have SAFETY MEASURES ARE LACKING. intensified that not all airlines in Indonesia have prioritised the safety of their passengers and crews. Some NGOs, DPR members and media outlets have recently questioned THE AVIATION INDUSTRY SEEMS TO BE TWO what they see as the development of a two-tier system within Indonesia’s TIERED IN INDONESIA. aviation industry. They say that many of the budget carriers are prioritising profit over safety while the more expensive carriers are doing a more professional job. However, the jury is still out on whether these budget carriers, which BUT THE JURY IS STILL OUT ON THE mushroomed after the industry was deregulated in the late 1990s, are operating BUDGET CARRIERS.
    [Show full text]
  • Signatory Visa Waiver Program (VWP) Carriers
    Visa Waiver Program (VWP) Signatory Carriers As of May 1, 2019 Carriers that are highlighted in yellow hold expired Visa Waiver Program Agreements and therefore are no longer authorized to transport VWP eligible passengers to the United States pursuant to the Visa Waiver Program Agreement Paragraph 14. When encountered, please remind them of the need to re-apply. # 21st Century Fox America, Inc. (04/07/2015) 245 Pilot Services Company, Inc. (01/14/2015) 258131 Aviation LLC (09/18/2013) 26 North Aviation Inc. 4770RR, LLC (12/06/2016) 51 CL Corp. (06/23/2017) 51 LJ Corporation (02/01/2016) 620, Inc. 650534 Alberta, Inc. d/b/a Latitude Air Ambulance (01/09/2017) 711 CODY, Inc. (02/09/2018) A A OK Jets A&M Global Solutions, Inc. (09/03/2014) A.J. Walter Aviation, Inc. (01/17/2014) A.R. Aviation, Corp. (12/30/2015) Abbott Laboratories Inc. (09/26/2012) ABC Aerolineas, S.A. de C.V. (d/b/a Interjet) (08/24/2011) Abelag Aviation NV d/b/a Luxaviation Belgium (02/27/2019) ABS Jets A.S. (05/07/2018) ACASS Canada Ltd. (02/27/2019) Accent Airways LLC (01/12/2015) Ace Aviation Services Corporation (08/24/2011) Ace Flight Center Inc. (07/30/2012) ACE Flight Operations a/k/a ACE Group (09/20/2015) Ace Flight Support ACG Air Cargo Germany GmbH (03/28/2011) ACG Logistics LLC (02/25/2019) ACL ACM Air Charter Luftfahrtgesellschaft GmbH (02/22/2018) ACM Aviation, Inc. (09/16/2011) ACP Jet Charter, Inc. (09/12/2013) Acromas Shipping Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Utilization of Tracking Devices on Lufthansa Cargo Flights
    Utilization of tracking devices on Lufthansa Cargo flights. Guideline Use of tracking devices on Lufthansa Cargo Flights Lufthansa Cargo allows customers the use of their own tracking devices on most Lufthansa* flights (please consider the affected actual types mentioned in this document). You have now the ability to add tracking devices to your shipments and receive additional information at frequent intervals. This information will be in addition to current CiQ- (old C2K-) milestones. Which tracking devices can be used? Active tracking devices send live shipment data such as actual location (via GPS and GSM), temperature, humidity, shock or changes in luminosity. Data transmission is disabled in all devices during flight to conform to air safety regulations. The following tracking devices** are currently allowed for use on Lufthansa flights: • 7PSolutions GD100, GL200, GL 300, GL 300W • Imec tempmate S1 • Bosch Basic Sense Type T and S • Intelyt, iCHIME • Bosch, TDL 110 • Intelyt, iTAG •. CalAmp SC1102 & SC1004 • ITAG®3 Pro • Cargosense – Toshiba Environmental Logger • Kirsen Global Security A-Type „Schenker Smartbox“ • Cartasense U-Sensor • Moog Crossbow ILC2000*** • Controlant CO 10.01 Real-Time Logger • MSR 145, MSR 165, MSR 175, • DHL SmartSensor RFID MSR63, MSR83, MSR64, MSR84 • ECD Solid II • OnAsset Sentry 500 Flightsafe • ECS, Logistic Monitoring Gateway (Model: GWS-CSCG) • OnAsset Sentinel 100,100A and 100L, 100B and 100S, 100P • GEO Single Use loSC Edge (V2) • Onset Computer Corporation, InTemp CX 500 • Hanhaa Parcelive • Roambee, Sensor Bee, BeeBeacon • HiveTracker Beecon, HiveTracker ComBox • Sendum PT300D • Honeywell (RTHAL-C1), (3G- ST-THALP-C1)“connected • SenseAware 2000 freight” • Tive TT-3000 *** The devices are not approved on Austrian Airlines, Aerologic and Brussels Airlines.
    [Show full text]
  • World Air Transport Statistics, Media Kit Edition 2021
    Since 1949 + WATSWorld Air Transport Statistics 2021 NOTICE DISCLAIMER. The information contained in this publication is subject to constant review in the light of changing government requirements and regulations. No subscriber or other reader should act on the basis of any such information without referring to applicable laws and regulations and/ or without taking appropriate professional advice. Although every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, the International Air Transport Associ- ation shall not be held responsible for any loss or damage caused by errors, omissions, misprints or misinterpretation of the contents hereof. Fur- thermore, the International Air Transport Asso- ciation expressly disclaims any and all liability to any person or entity, whether a purchaser of this publication or not, in respect of anything done or omitted, and the consequences of anything done or omitted, by any such person or entity in reliance on the contents of this publication. Opinions expressed in advertisements ap- pearing in this publication are the advertiser’s opinions and do not necessarily reflect those of IATA. The mention of specific companies or products in advertisement does not im- ply that they are endorsed or recommended by IATA in preference to others of a similar na- ture which are not mentioned or advertised. © International Air Transport Association. All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, recast, reformatted or trans- mitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage and retrieval sys- tem, without the prior written permission from: Deputy Director General International Air Transport Association 33, Route de l’Aéroport 1215 Geneva 15 Airport Switzerland World Air Transport Statistics, Plus Edition 2021 ISBN 978-92-9264-350-8 © 2021 International Air Transport Association.
    [Show full text]