DOCSLIB.ORG

Date: Subject

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Date: Subject From: Anne Cardwell To: Amalia Lorentz; Charlie Knox; Council: Jim Erickson Date: 5/2/2008 5:20:31 PM Subject: Fwd: FW: Important reports on economic potential of cleantech industry in Bay Area Hi, It looks like some of you already received this, but just in case... thanks, Anne >>> Norma Fox <[email protected]> 5/2/2008 4:46 PM »> Hi Anne, Can you check and make sure that this email did get to the Council members. Also, please forward it to any other interested persons, such as Jim Erickson, Amalia Lorentz, Charlie Knox, etc. thanks very much, Norma Fox From: [email protected] To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Important reports on economic potential of cleantech industry in Bay Area Date: Fri, 2 May 200816:41 :01 -0700 .ExternalClass .EC_hmmessage P{padding:Opx;}.ExternaIClass body.EC_hmmessage{font-size:1Opt;font­ family:Tahoma;}Dear City Council members, I've been doing some research on the economic potential of the emerging cleantech industry in the Bay Area and I've found some reports that I beg you to read. (I'm just providing links to the reports rather than attached files. The link should open up the report (pdf) and you can either read it online or print it out. If the link doesn't work, let me know and I'll send the file itself or hand deliver it.) After reading these reports I'm convinced that it's imperative, for the healthy economic future of Benicia, that the Seeno project must begin with the industrial zone as Phase I (with a specific cleantech R&D focus), and not with the commercial zone. After a 7-8 year build out of the commercial zone as Phase I, we will have missed out on our golden window of economic opportunityl It's all happening now, not 8 years from now (explosion of University R&D, spin off cleantech businesses, govt. initiatives and grants, venture capital, etc.). And we are perfectly situated, 40 min. from UC Davis and 40 min. from UCB, with acres of vacant land already zoned industrial, and a well matched employment pool, and relatively low cost housing, and good schools. (It might also give us a better shot at getting a ferry stop here.) This could be Benicia's golden egg. But only if we act now. Remember that our 10-year Economic Development Strategy--adopted by Council last fall--does call for 'clean energy high-tech R&D uses in our industrial districts' in the next ten years (not commercial development there). I really believe if we require Seeno to pay for a thorough and up to date economic analysis (such as this example of what Oakland did for their Gateway Development Area) comparing the projected economic viability of his current development scenario with the projected economic Viability of a cleantech industrial/R&D campus (assuming Phase I begins with industrial/R&D), it would clearly show the later to be far more likely to be economically successful-given the context of today's current and future economic pressures, constraints and opportunities. The General Plan Policies on Sustainable Economy (Prog.2.5.c) calls for evaluating future uses on a cosVrevenue basis for the long term. Apparently Seeno produced some sort of rosy economic analysis in 2006, based on old data, (which no one has ever seen) but it was never reviewed and vetted for accuracy by any independent financial expert or economist. Would it be possible for the Council to require an up to date and professional economic analysis, with independent audit and verification, comparing the above Cleantech scenario to Seeno's proposed plan, before any project can be approved? Anyway, here are the links to the reports. Think about what this could mean for Benicia's future and jobs for Benicians. Thanks for your time! --Norma Fox 1) Clean Technology And the Green Economy, March 2008 I http://www.labor.ca.gov/panel/pdf/DRAFT Green Economy 031708.pdf 2) Clean Energy Trends 2008 , ~arch 2008 http://www.cleanedge.com/reports/pdflTrends2008.pdf 3) Innovative Energy Solutions from the SF Bay Area: Fueling a Clean Energy Future, June 2007 http://www.bayeconfor.org/medialfiles/pdf/FuelingACleanEnergyFuture.pdf 4) The Economic Development Potential of the Green Sector, June 2006 http://repositories.cdlib.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1 086&context=lewis Windows Live SkyDrive lets you share files with faraway friends. Start sharing. Stay in touch when you're away with Windows Live Messenger. 1M anytime you're online. DRAFT California Economic Strategy Panel Members Secretary Victoria L. Bradshaw – Chair Pius Lee, California Realty & Land, Inc. Danny Wan, Port of Oakland The Honorable Juan Arambula, California State Assembly Jerold Neuman, Allen, Matkins, Leck, Gamble & Mallory LLP Malaki Seku-Amen, UNITY Media Joseph Fernandez, Active Motif, Inc. Barry Hibbard, Tejon Ranch Company Larry Mankin, Santa Clarita Valley Chamber of Commerce Tim Rios, Wells Fargo Bank Scott Syphax, Nehemiah Corporation Pablo Wong, Fidelity National Title Group Edward Kawahara, PhD, Principal Consultant to the Panel PREFACE The California Economic Strategy Panel (Panel) continuously examines changes in the state’s economic base and industry sectors to develop a statewide vision and strategic initiatives to guide public policy decisions for economic growth and competitiveness (see www.labor.ca.gov/panel/). The fifteen-member Panel is comprised of eight appointees by the Governor, two appointees each by the President pro Tempore and the Speaker and one each by the Senate and Assembly Minority Floor Leaders. The Secretary of the California Labor & Workforce Development Agency serves as the Chair. The Panel first identified California’s economy as an economy of regions in 1996. At that time, the Panel also adopted a new way of looking at industry sectors and how they function and grow as industry clusters. These new ways of looking at the economy became the basis for the analytical work completed then, and have provided a foundation for the Panel’s work since that time. The California Regional Economies Project is currently the lead research mechanism for the Panel to identify economic policy issues and growing industry sectors. The project provides the state’s economic and workforce development systems with data and information about changing regional economies and labor markets. The information provides a new resource in economic and workforce development strategic planning, policy development and investment decisions at the state and regional levels. With the enactment of the California Global Warming Solutions Act (AB 32) as well as several Climate Action Team initiatives, California is becoming a national and global leader in combining advances in public policy and private sector innovation to enhance both environmental quality and economic growth. With the venture capital community heavily investing in a range of clean technologies, questions arise as to what makes up the green economy, what jobs are being created, and what economic policy issues need to be addressed. These investments signal a transformation for the entire California economy. The Clean Technology and the Green Economy: Growing Products, Services, Businesses and Jobs in California’s Value Network is another monograph in a series of studies produced under the California Regional Economies Project. The monograph’s primary objective is to help define California’s green economy and provide state government policy leaders with answers to the questions above. The California Economic Strategy Panel will engage the range of leaders contributing to this economic transformation and consider policy implications to facilitate growth and competitiveness of the emerging green economy. The California Regional Economies Project is sponsored by the California Labor & Workforce Development Agency, California Employment Development Department, California Workforce Investment Board, California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office and Employment Training Panel. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary.......................................................................................................... 5 The Context: New Constraints and New Options........................................................ 6 What is the Green Economy? .......................................................................................... 7 California’s Green Economy Value Network.......................................................................................8 Example: The Solar Energy Value Network ......................................................................................11 Inventory of California’s Green Industry Firms: How Large is the Industry? ........... 13 Composition of California’s Green Business......................................................................................14 Geographical Distribution of the Green Economy...........................................................................19 A Promising Environment for California’s Green Economy....................................... 20 Green Innovation & Entrepreneurship.................................................................................................20 Innovative Public Policy: New Technology – New Markets..........................................................23 Appendix .......................................................................................................................... 27 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Nationally and globally, attentions are focusing on rising energy costs, questions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Renewable Tracking Progress Appendix
    California Energy Commission – Tracking Progress Renewable Energy Advancing the use and availability of renewable energy is critical to achieving California’s ambitious climate goals. With this in mind, California has pursued a suite of policies and programs aimed at advancing renewable energy and ensuring all Californians, including low- income and disadvantaged communities, benefit from this transition. This report presents the state’s progress in meeting its renewable energy goals and provides an updated analysis through 2018 of renewable energy generation, installed renewable capacity, and a discussion of the trends, opportunities, and challenges associated with the renewable energy transition. More detailed figures and tables are included in the appendix.1 Renewable Energy Serving California Consumers Annual Renewable Percentage: Renewables Portfolio Standard Progress An increasing percentage of energy consumed by Californians comes from renewable sources. A key mandate advancing the use of renewable energy has been the Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS), which requires California load-serving entities2 (LSEs) to increase their procurement of eligible renewable energy resources (solar, wind, geothermal, biomass, and small hydroelectric) to 33 percent of retail sales by 2020 and 60 percent of retail sales by 2030. Based on reported electric generation from RPS-eligible sources divided by forecasted electricity retail sales for 2019, the California Energy Commission (CEC) estimates that 36 percent of California’s 2019 retail electricity sales was served by RPS-eligible renewable resources as shown in Figure 1. Although this number is not a final RPS determination, it is an important indicator of progress in achieving California’s RPS goals. Figure 1: Estimated Current Renewables Portfolio Standard Progress Source: CEC staff analysis, December 2019 The annual renewable percentage estimated by the CEC has continued to increase in recent years, often ahead of the timelines envisioned by prior legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Barriers, Opportunities, and Research Needs Draft Report
    Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) Program FINAL PROJECT REPORT TASK 5. Biomass Energy in California’s Future: Barriers, Opportunities, and Research Needs_ Draft Report Prepared for: California Energy Commission Prepared by: UC Davis California Geothermal Energy Collaborative DECEMBER 2013 CEC‐500‐01‐016 Prepared by: Primary Author(s): Stephen Kaffka, University of California, Davis Robert Williams, University of California, Davis Douglas Wickizer, University of California, Davis UC Davis California Geothermal Energy Collaborative 1715 Tilia St. Davis, CA 95616 www.cgec.ucdavis.edu Contract Number: 500‐01‐016 Prepared for: California Energy Commission Michael Sokol Contract Manager Reynaldo Gonzalez Office Manager Energy Generation Research Office Laurie ten Hope Deputy Director Energy Research & Development Division Robert P. Oglesby Executive Director DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as the result of work sponsored by the California Energy Commission. It does not necessarily represent the views of the Energy Commission, its employees or the State of California. The Energy Commission, the State of California, its employees, contractors and subcontractors make no warrant, express or implied, and assume no legal liability for the information in this report; nor does any party represent that the uses of this information will not infringe upon privately owned rights. This report has not been approved or disapproved by the California Energy Commission nor has the California Energy Commission passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of the information in this report. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The California Goethermal Energy Collaborative would like to thank the California Energy Commission and its Public Interest Energy Research Program (PIER) for sponsoring this important work as well as the Geothermal Energy Association for assisting in tracking down the most up to date data both within the United States and abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Solyndra: Examining the Department of Energy's Loan Guarantee Program Hilary Kao
    William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review Volume 37 | Issue 2 Article 4 Beyond Solyndra: Examining the Department of Energy's Loan Guarantee Program Hilary Kao Repository Citation Hilary Kao, Beyond Solyndra: Examining the Department of Energy's Loan Guarantee Program, 37 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 425 (2013), http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmelpr/vol37/iss2/4 Copyright c 2013 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmelpr BEYOND SOLYNDRA: EXAMINING THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY’S LOAN GUARANTEE PROGRAM HILARY KAO* ABSTRACT In the year following the Fukushima nuclear disaster in March 2011, the renewable and clean energy industries faced significant turmoil— from natural disasters, to political maelstroms, from the Great Recession, to U.S. debt ceiling debates. The Department of Energy’s Loan Guarantee Program (“DOE LGP”), often a target since before it ever received a dollar of appropriations, has been both blamed and defended in the wake of the bankruptcy filing of Solyndra, a California-based solar panel manufac- turer, in September 2011, because of the $535 million loan guarantee made to it by the Department of Energy (“DOE”) in 2009.1 Critics have suggested political favoritism in loan guarantee awards and have questioned the government’s proper role in supporting renewable energy companies and the renewable energy industry generally.2 This Article looks beyond the Solyndra controversy to examine the origin, structure and purpose of the DOE LGP. It asserts that loan guaran- tees can serve as viable policy tools, but require careful crafting to have the potential to be effective programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Incorporating Renewables Into the Electric Grid: Expanding Opportunities for Smart Markets and Energy Storage
    INCORPORATING RENEWABLES INTO THE ELECTRIC GRID: EXPANDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR SMART MARKETS AND ENERGY STORAGE June 2016 Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 5 I. Technical and Economic Considerations in Renewable Integration .......................................................... 7 Characteristics of a Grid with High Levels of Variable Energy Resources ................................................. 7 Technical Feasibility and Cost of Integration .......................................................................................... 12 II. Evidence on the Cost of Integrating Variable Renewable Generation ................................................... 15 Current and Historical Ancillary Service Costs ........................................................................................ 15 Model Estimates of the Cost of Renewable Integration ......................................................................... 17 Evidence from Ancillary Service Markets................................................................................................ 18 Effect of variable generation on expected day-ahead regulation mileage......................................... 19 Effect of variable generation on actual regulation mileage ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Vehicle Demonstration Projects In
    ELECTRIC VEHICLE DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS IN THE UNITED STATES Prepared For TEKES The Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation NWV Market Discovery, Inc. 20781 Evergreen Mills Road · Leesburg, VA 20175, USA Tel 1-703-777-1727 · Cell 1-703-909-0603 · URL: www.nwv.com CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES ________________________________________ 4 2. INTRODUCTION ____________________________________________________ 6 2.1. POLITICAL CONTEXT _________________________________________________ 6 2.2. ELECTRICAL CAR MANUFACTURERS ___________________________________ 7 2.3. MUNICIPALITIES _____________________________________________________ 7 2.4. INFRASTRUCTURE ___________________________________________________ 7 2.5. TECHNOLOGY & COMPONENT SUPPLIERS______________________________ 9 2.6. RETAIL, SALES & CONSUMER SERVICE _________________________________ 9 2.7. FUNDING ___________________________________________________________ 9 2.8. INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION ___________________________________ 10 2.9. GLOBAL INITIATIVES ________________________________________________ 10 2.10. SOURCES __________________________________________________________ 12 3. DEMONSTRATION & TEST PROJECTS _________________________________ 13 3.1. THE EV PROJECT ___________________________________________________ 13 3.2. PROJECT PLUG - IN _________________________________________________ 18 3.3. USPS PILOT PROGRAM “CONVERT LLVs TO EVs”_______________________ 23 3.4. PORT OF LOS ANGELES ELECTRIC TRUCK DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS ___ 26 3.5. SDG&E CTP EV DEMONSTRATION
    [Show full text]
  • The Green Economic Recovery: Wind Energy Tax Policy After Financial Crisis and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Oregon Scholars' Bank JEFFRY S. HINMAN∗ The Green Economic Recovery: Wind Energy Tax Policy After Financial Crisis and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009 I. The Benefits, Challenges, and Potential of the U.S. Wind Industry................................................................................... 39 A. Environmental Benefits of Wind...................................... 40 B. Economic Benefits of Wind ............................................. 41 1. Jobs and Economic Activity........................................ 41 2. Competitiveness with Traditional Power Plants ......... 43 C. Challenges for the Wind Energy Industry ......................... 44 1. Efficiency, Grid Access, and Intermittency ................ 44 2. Environmental Concerns and Local Opposition ......... 45 II. Federal Support for Renewable Energy Past and Present ....... 46 A. Renewable Energy Tax Policy 1978 to 1992 .................... 47 1. The National Energy Act of 1978 ............................... 48 2. Additional State-Level Tax Incentives in California During the 1980s ....................................... 50 3. The California Wind Boom......................................... 51 4. Shortcomings of the Wind Boom................................ 52 5. The Free Market Approach 1986 to 1992 ................... 53 ∗ J.D., University of Oregon School of Law, 2009; Editor-in-Chief, Journal of Environmental Law and Litigation, 2008–2009; Recipient, Tax Law Certificate of Completion; B.S., Oregon State University, 2002. I want to thank the editorial staff of the Journal of Environmental Law and Litigation for their friendship and masterful edits. I also want to extend my appreciation to the excellent tax law faculty at the University of Oregon, Professors Roberta Mann and Nancy Shurtz, for their guidance and feedback. Finally, and most importantly, I owe a huge debt of gratitude to my incredible wife Kathleen for her patience and support.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Incentives for Clean Energy After Solyndra: a Post-Recovery Act Precipice
    North Dakota Law Review Volume 87 Number 4 Article 7 1-1-2011 Federal Incentives for Clean Energy After Solyndra: A Post- Recovery Act Precipice John A. Herrick Cara S. Elias Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/ndlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Herrick, John A. and Elias, Cara S. (2011) "Federal Incentives for Clean Energy After Solyndra: A Post- Recovery Act Precipice," North Dakota Law Review: Vol. 87 : No. 4 , Article 7. Available at: https://commons.und.edu/ndlr/vol87/iss4/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Dakota Law Review by an authorized editor of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HERRICK 10-15-10 MFE (DO NOT DELETE) 10/15/2012 10:13 AM FEDERAL INCENTIVES FOR CLEAN ENERGY AFTER SOLYNDRA: A POST–RECOVERY ACT PRECIPICE JOHN A. HERRICK* & CARA S. ELIAS** I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................... 628 II. FEDERAL NON-TAX INCENTIVE PROGRAMS .................. 630 A. TYPES OF FEDERAL INCENTIVES FOR CLEAN ENERGY ........ 630 1. PURPA Renewable Power Purchase Requirements ...... 630 2. Federal Financial Assistance Programs for Clean Energy ............................................................................ 632 3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Cooperative Agreements ..................................................................... 635 4. DOE Technology Investment Agreements ...................... 637 5. Federal Loan Guarantees .............................................. 638 6. Rights to Intellectual Property Under Federal Incentive Programs ........................................................................ 640 * John A. Herrick is Senior Counsel in the Denver office of Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck LLP where he specializes in the clean technology practice area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Water-Energy Nexus: Challenges and Opportunities Overview
    U.S. Department of Energy The Water-Energy Nexus: Challenges and Opportunities JUNE 2014 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Table of Contents Foreword ................................................................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................. iii Executive Summary.............................................................................................................................................. v Chapter 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 DOE’s Motivation and Role .................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 The DOE Approach ................................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Opportunities ............................................................................................................................................. 4 References ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • California's Energy Future
    California’s Energy Future: The View to 2050 Summary Report May 2011 Jane C. S. Long (co-chair) LEGAL NOTICE This report was prepared pursuant to a contract between the California Energy Commission (CEC) and the California Council on Science and Technology (CCST). It does not represent the views of the CEC, its employees, or the State of California. The CEC, the State of California, its employees, contractors, and subcontractors make no warranty, express or implied, and assume no legal liability for the information in this report; nor does any party represent that the use of this information will not infringe upon privately owned rights. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would also like to thank the Stephen Bechtel Fund and the California Energy Commision for their contributions to the underwriting of this project. We would also like to thank the California Air Resources Board for their continued support and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for underwriting the leadership of this effort. COPYRIGHT Copyright 2011 by the California Council on Science and Technology. Library of Congress Cataloging Number in Publications Data Main Entry Under Title: California’s Energy Future: A View to 2050 May 2011 ISBN-13: 978-1-930117-44-0 Note: The California Council on Science and Technology (CCST) has made every reasonable effort to assure the accuracy of the information in this publication. However, the contents of this publication are subject to changes, omissions, and errors, and CCST does not accept responsibility for any inaccuracies that may occur. CCST is a non-profit organization established in 1988 at the request of the California State Government and sponsored by the major public and private postsecondary institutions of California and affiliate federal laboratories in conjunction with leading private-sector firms.
    [Show full text]
  • The Solyndra Failurex
    The Solyndra Failurex Majority Staff Report Prepared for the Use of the Committee on Energy and Commerce Fred Upton, Chairman U.S. House of Representatives 112th Congress August 2, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................... ii TABLE OF NAMES .......................................................................................................... v I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 II. HISTORY OF THE COMMITTEE’S INVESTIGATION .................................... 5 III. DOE’S REVIEW OF THE SOLYNDRA LOAN APPLICATION AND CONDITIONAL COMMITMENT ........................................................................ 9 A. The Energy Policy Act of 2005 and The Establishment of the Loan Guarantee Program at DOE .............................................................................................................................. 9 B. Solyndra’s Application ................................................................................................... 10 C. Solyndra Loan Application Begins Due Diligence and Is Remanded by the First DOE Credit Committee (2008 and 2009) ................................................................................ 12 D. The Stimulus and Other Changes to the DOE Loan Guarantee Program Under the Obama Administration ................................................................................................... 16 E. Review
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Projects: DOE Section 1705 Loan Guarantees Name Redacted Analyst in Energy Policy
    Solar Projects: DOE Section 1705 Loan Guarantees name redacted Analyst in Energy Policy October 25, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov R42059 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Solar Projects: DOE Section 1705 Loan Guarantees ince Solyndra, a solar system manufacturing company that received a $535 million loan guarantee from the Department of Energy (DOE), filed for bankruptcy in September of S2011 there has been much congressional interest in better understanding the characteristics of renewable energy projects, specifically solar projects, that have received DOE loan guarantees. The objective of this report is to provide Congress with insight regarding solar projects supported by DOE’s loan guarantee program, the risk characteristics of these projects, and how other DOE loan guarantee projects are either similar to or different from the Solyndra solar manufacturing project. Key Points • DOE’s Loan Programs Office (LPO) administers three separate loan programs: (1) Section 17031 loan guarantees, (2) Section 17052 loan guarantees, and (3) Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing (ATVM) loans. • To date, all loan guarantees for solar projects have been provided under LPO’s Section 1705 program. • LPO’s Section 1705 program has closed transactions that guarantee approximately $16.15 billion of loans for renewable energy projects. Roughly 82% ($13.27 billion) of Section 1705 loan guarantees have been for solar projects. • Solar projects supported by Section 1705 loan guarantees generally fall into one of two categories: (1) solar manufacturing, or (2) solar generation. Each category has different financial, operational, and technology risk characteristics. • Four solar manufacturing projects, including Solyndra, have received loan guarantees totaling $1.28 billion, which is approximately 8% of the total dollar value of loans guaranteed under the Section 1705 program.
    [Show full text]
  • Penn Law Journal: an Rx to Heal Criminal Justice
    et al.: Penn Law Journal: An Rx to Heal Criminal Justice UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA FALL 2014 VOLUME 49, NUMBER 2 AN RX TO HEAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE ALSO: THE QUANTUM COMPUTER COMES OF AGE THE PUBLIC SERVICE SCHOOL RIGHT ON THE MONEY Published by Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository, 2014 1 Penn Law Journal, Vol. 49, Iss. 2 [2014], Art. 1 Cover Illustration: © Christopher Short Design by: Emily Zuwiala https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/plj/vol49/iss2/1 2 et al.: Penn Law Journal: An Rx to Heal Criminal Justice PENNLAW JOURNAL FEATURES 12 Right on the Money 12 BY LARRY TEITELBAUM Massachusetts native Ernie Gonsalves C’72 emigrated to Penn and never looked back. Now that retirement looms, we pause to thank Ernie for his long economic stewardship of the Law School. An Rx to Heal Criminal Justice 14 BY FREDDA SACHAROW Solutions to our broken criminal justice system are hard to come by, given fragmentation and resistance to change. Penn Law’s Quattrone Center aims for a breakthrough, borrowing lessons from aviation and medicine. 14 The Quantum Computer Comes of Age 20 BY LARRY TEITELBAUM Haig Farris L’63 likes to play the odds. So he’s put money — a lot of money — on what he considers the Next Big Thing. If he’s right, computers that run exponentially faster than conventional computers will supercharge a digital age unlike anything we’ve seen before. The Public Service School 26 Penn Law is synonymous with Public Service. On the 25th anniversary of the program, we remain at the top of our game with a slew of programs that provide endless opportunities for students and untold benefits for people in need.
    [Show full text]