DOCSLIB.ORG

Energy from Wind, Water and Solar Power by 2030

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

RETHINKING “HOBBITS” THE EVERYTHING TV What They Mean for Human Evolution Get Ready for the Wide-Screen Web The Long-Lost Siblings of OUR SUN page 40 November 2009 www.Scientif cAmerican.com A Plan for a Sustainable Future How to get all energy from wind, water and solar power by 2030 Chronic Pain What Goes Wrong Plus: • The Future of Cars • Farms in Skyscrapers $5.99 ENERGY A PATH TO SUSTAINABLE ENERGY BY 2030 Wind, water and n December leaders from around the world for at least a decade, analyzing various pieces of will meet in Copenhagen to try to agree on the challenge. Most recently, a 2009 Stanford solar technologies Icutting back greenhouse gas emissions for University study ranked energy systems accord- can provide decades to come. The most effective step to im- ing to their impacts on global warming, pollu- 100 percent of the plement that goal would be a massive shift away tion, water supply, land use, wildlife and other from fossil fuels to clean, renewable energy concerns. The very best options were wind, so- ) dam world’s energy, sources. If leaders can have conf dence that such lar, geothermal, tidal and hydroelectric pow- ( eliminating all a transformation is possible, they might commit er—all of which are driven by wind, water or to an historic agreement. We think they can. sunlight (referred to as WWS). Nuclear power, fossil fuels. A year ago former vice president Al Gore coal with carbon capture, and ethanol were all Photos Aurora HERE’S HOW threw down a gauntlet: to repower America poorer options, as were oil and natural gas. The with 100 percent carbon-free electricity within study also found that battery-electric vehicles 10 years. As the two of us started to evaluate the and hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles recharged by HEINSOHNBILL ); feasibility of such a change, we took on an even WWS options would largely eliminate pollution wind farm wind larger challenge: to determine how 100 percent from the transportation sector. ( of the world’s energy, for all purposes, could be Our plan calls for millions of wind turbines, supplied by wind, water and solar resources, by water machines and solar installations. The Aurora Photos Aurora By Mark Z. Jacobson as early as 2030. Our plan is presented here. numbers are large, but the scale is not an insur- and Mark A. Delucchi Scientists have been building to this moment mountable hurdle; society has achieved massive LEE JOHN 58 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN November 2009 transformations before. During World War II, tion, operation and decommissioning. For ex- the U.S. retooled automobile factories to pro- ample, when burned in vehicles, even the most KEY CONCEPTS duce 300,000 aircraft, and other countries pro- ecologically acceptable sources of ethanol create duced 486,000 more. In 1956 the U.S. began air pollution that will cause the same mortality ■ Supplies of wind and solar building the Interstate Highway System, which level as when gasoline is burned. Nuclear power energy on accessible land after 35 years extended for 47,000 miles, chang- results in up to 25 times more carbon emissions dwarf the energy con- sumed by people around ing commerce and society. than wind energy, when reactor construction the globe. Is it feasible to transform the world’s energy and uranium ref ning and transport are consid- systems? Could it be accomplished in two de- ered. Carbon capture and sequestration technol- ■ The authors’ plan calls cades? The answers depend on the technologies ogy can reduce carbon dioxide emissions from for 3.8 million large wind chosen, the availability of critical materials, and coal-f red power plants but will increase air pol- turbines, 90,000 solar plants, and numerous economic and political factors. lutants and will extend all the other deleterious geothermal, tidal and effects of coal mining, transport and processing, rooftop photovoltaic Clean Technologies Only because more coal must be burned to power the installations worldwide. Renewable energy comes from enticing sources: capture and storage steps. Similarly, we consider wind, which also produces waves; water, which only technologies that do not present signif cant ■ The cost of generating and transmitting power includes hydroelectric, tidal and geothermal ener- waste disposal or terrorism risks. would be less than the gy (water heated by hot underground rock); and In our plan, WWS will supply electric power projected cost per sun, which includes photovoltaics and solar pow- for heating and transportation—industries that kilowatt-hour for fossil- er plants that focus sunlight to heat a f uid that will have to revamp if the world has any hope of fuel and nuclear power. drives a turbine to generate electricity. Our plan slowing climate change. We have assumed that ■ Shortages of a few ) includes only technologies that work or are close most fossil-fuel heating (as well as ovens and specialty materials, to working today on a large scale, rather than stoves) can be replaced by electric systems and along with lack of solar panelssolar those that may exist 20 or 30 years from now. that most fossil-fuel transportation can be re- political will, loom as To ensure that our system remains clean, we placed by battery and fuel-cell vehicles. Hydro- the greatest obstacles. consider only technologies that have near-zero gen, produced by using WWS electricity to split —The Editors emissions of greenhouse gases and air pollutants water (electrolysis), would power fuel cells and HO/REUTERS/CORBIS ( HO/REUTERS/CORBIS over their entire life cycle, including construc- be burned in airplanes and by industry. www.ScientificAmerican.com SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN 59 RENEWABLE POWER AVAILABLE POWER NEEDED IN READILY ACCESSIBLE LOCATIONS WORLDWIDE IN 2030 Plenty of Supply Today the maximum power consumed world- WATER 2 TW wide at any given moment is about 12.5 trillion watts (terawatts, or TW), according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. The agen- cy projects that in 2030 the world will require WIND 40–85 TW 16.9 TW of power as global population and liv- IF CONVENTIONAL SUPPLY 16.9 TW ing standards rise, with about 2.8 TW in the U.S. The mix of sources is similar to today’s, heavily dependent on fossil fuels. If, however, the planet were powered entirely by WWS, with no fossil-fuel or biomass combustion, an intrigu- OR ing savings would occur. Global power demand would be only 11.5 TW, and U.S. demand would be 1.8 TW. That decline occurs because, in most cases, electrif cation is a more eff cient way to use energy. For example, only 17 to 20 percent of the energy in gasoline is used to move a vehi- cle (the rest is wasted as heat), whereas 75 to 86 IF RENEWABLE percent of the electricity delivered to an electric SUPPLY (MORE vehicle goes into motion. EFFICIENT) Even if demand did rise to 16.9 TW, WWS 11.5 TW sources could provide far more power. Detailed studies by us and others indicate that energy from the wind, worldwide, is about 1,700 TW. Solar, alone, offers 6,500 TW. Of course, wind and sun out in the open seas, over high moun- tains and across protected regions would not be available. If we subtract these and low-wind ar- eas not likely to be developed, we are still left with 40 to 85 TW for wind and 580 TW for so- lar, each far beyond future human demand. Yet currently we generate only 0.02 TW of wind power and 0.008 TW of solar. These sources hold an incredible amount of untapped potential. The other WWS technologies will help create a f exible range of options. Although all the sources can expand greatly, for practical rea- sons, wave power can be extracted only near coastal areas. Many geothermal sources are too deep to be tapped economically. And even though hydroelectric power now exceeds all other WWS sources, most of the suitable large reservoirs are already in use. MW – MEGAWATT = 1 MILLION WATTS GW – GIGAWATT = 1 BILLION WATTS TW – TERAWATT = 1 TRILLION WATTS SOLAR 580 TW ➥ The Editors welcome responses to this article. To comment and to see more detailed calculations, go to www.Scientif cAmerican.com/sustainable-energy 60 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN November 2009 RENEWABLE INSTALLATIONS REQUIRED WORLDWIDE WATER 1.1 TW (9% OF SUPPLY) 490,000 TIDAL TURBINES – 1 MW* – < 1% IN PLACE *size of unit 5,350 GEOTHERMAL PLANTS – 100 MW – 2% IN PLACE The Plan: Power Plants Required Clearly, enough renewable energy exists. How, 900 then, would we transition to a new infrastruc- HYDROELECTRIC PLANTS – 1,300 MW – 70% IN PLACE ture to provide the world with 11.5 TW? We have chosen a mix of technologies emphasizing wind and solar, with about 9 percent of demand met by mature water-related methods. (Other 3,800,000 combinations of wind and solar could be as WIND TURBINES – 5 MW – 1% IN PLACE successful .) Wind supplies 51 percent of the demand, pro- vided by 3.8 million large wind turbines (each WIND 5.8 TW rated at f ve megawatts) worldwide. Although 720,000 that quantity may sound enormous, it is interest- (51% OF SUPPLY) WAVE CONVERTERS* – 0.75 MW – < 1% IN PLACE *wind drives waves ing to note that the world manufactures 73 mil- lion cars and light trucks every year. Another 40 percent of the power comes from photovolta- ics and concentrated solar plants, with about 30 percent of the photovoltaic output from roof- 1,700,000,000 top panels on homes and commercial buildings. ROOFTOP PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS* – 0.003 MW – < 1% IN PLACE About 89,000 photovoltaic and concentrated *sized for a modest house; a commercial roof might have dozens of systems solar power plants, averaging 300 megawatts apiece, would be needed.
Recommended publications
  • Renewable Tracking Progress Appendix

    Renewable Tracking Progress Appendix

    California Energy Commission – Tracking Progress Renewable Energy Advancing the use and availability of renewable energy is critical to achieving California’s ambitious climate goals. With this in mind, California has pursued a suite of policies and programs aimed at advancing renewable energy and ensuring all Californians, including low- income and disadvantaged communities, benefit from this transition. This report presents the state’s progress in meeting its renewable energy goals and provides an updated analysis through 2018 of renewable energy generation, installed renewable capacity, and a discussion of the trends, opportunities, and challenges associated with the renewable energy transition. More detailed figures and tables are included in the appendix.1 Renewable Energy Serving California Consumers Annual Renewable Percentage: Renewables Portfolio Standard Progress An increasing percentage of energy consumed by Californians comes from renewable sources. A key mandate advancing the use of renewable energy has been the Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS), which requires California load-serving entities2 (LSEs) to increase their procurement of eligible renewable energy resources (solar, wind, geothermal, biomass, and small hydroelectric) to 33 percent of retail sales by 2020 and 60 percent of retail sales by 2030. Based on reported electric generation from RPS-eligible sources divided by forecasted electricity retail sales for 2019, the California Energy Commission (CEC) estimates that 36 percent of California’s 2019 retail electricity sales was served by RPS-eligible renewable resources as shown in Figure 1. Although this number is not a final RPS determination, it is an important indicator of progress in achieving California’s RPS goals. Figure 1: Estimated Current Renewables Portfolio Standard Progress Source: CEC staff analysis, December 2019 The annual renewable percentage estimated by the CEC has continued to increase in recent years, often ahead of the timelines envisioned by prior legislation.
  • Comparative Review of a Dozen National Energy Plans: Focus on Renewable and Efficient Energy

    Comparative Review of a Dozen National Energy Plans: Focus on Renewable and Efficient Energy

    Technical Report A Comparative Review of a Dozen NREL/TP-6A2-45046 National Energy Plans: Focus on March 2009 Renewable and Efficient Energy Jeffrey Logan and Ted L. James Technical Report A Comparative Review of a Dozen NREL/TP-6A2-45046 National Energy Plans: Focus on March 2009 Renewable and Efficient Energy Jeffrey Logan and Ted L. James Prepared under Task No. SAO7.9C50 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC Contract No. DE-AC36-08-GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. Available electronically at http://www.osti.gov/bridge Available for a processing fee to U.S.
  • Barriers, Opportunities, and Research Needs Draft Report

    Barriers, Opportunities, and Research Needs Draft Report

    Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) Program FINAL PROJECT REPORT TASK 5. Biomass Energy in California’s Future: Barriers, Opportunities, and Research Needs_ Draft Report Prepared for: California Energy Commission Prepared by: UC Davis California Geothermal Energy Collaborative DECEMBER 2013 CEC‐500‐01‐016 Prepared by: Primary Author(s): Stephen Kaffka, University of California, Davis Robert Williams, University of California, Davis Douglas Wickizer, University of California, Davis UC Davis California Geothermal Energy Collaborative 1715 Tilia St. Davis, CA 95616 www.cgec.ucdavis.edu Contract Number: 500‐01‐016 Prepared for: California Energy Commission Michael Sokol Contract Manager Reynaldo Gonzalez Office Manager Energy Generation Research Office Laurie ten Hope Deputy Director Energy Research & Development Division Robert P. Oglesby Executive Director DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as the result of work sponsored by the California Energy Commission. It does not necessarily represent the views of the Energy Commission, its employees or the State of California. The Energy Commission, the State of California, its employees, contractors and subcontractors make no warrant, express or implied, and assume no legal liability for the information in this report; nor does any party represent that the uses of this information will not infringe upon privately owned rights. This report has not been approved or disapproved by the California Energy Commission nor has the California Energy Commission passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of the information in this report. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The California Goethermal Energy Collaborative would like to thank the California Energy Commission and its Public Interest Energy Research Program (PIER) for sponsoring this important work as well as the Geothermal Energy Association for assisting in tracking down the most up to date data both within the United States and abroad.
  • The BRIDGE Linking Engin Ee Ring and Soci E T Y

    The BRIDGE Linking Engin Ee Ring and Soci E T Y

    Spring 2010 THE ELECTRICITY GRID The BRIDGE LINKING ENGIN ee RING AND SOCI E TY The Impact of Renewable Resources on the Performance and Reliability of the Electricity Grid Vijay Vittal Securing the Electricity Grid S. Massoud Amin New Products and Services for the Electric Power Industry Clark W. Gellings Energy Independence: Can the U.S. Finally Get It Right? John F. Caskey Educating the Workforce for the Modern Electric Power System: University–Industry Collaboration B. Don Russell The Smart Grid: A Bridge between Emerging Technologies, Society, and the Environment Richard E. Schuler Promoting the technological welfare of the nation by marshalling the knowledge and insights of eminent members of the engineering profession. The BRIDGE NatiOnaL AcaDemY OF Engineering Irwin M. Jacobs, Chair Charles M. Vest, President Maxine L. Savitz, Vice President Thomas F. Budinger, Home Secretary George Bugliarello, Foreign Secretary C.D. (Dan) Mote Jr., Treasurer Editor in Chief (interim): George Bugliarello Managing Editor: Carol R. Arenberg Production Assistant: Penelope Gibbs The Bridge (ISSN 0737-6278) is published quarterly by the National Aca- demy of Engineering, 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20418. Periodicals postage paid at Washington, DC. Vol. 40, No. 1, Spring 2010 Postmaster: Send address changes to The Bridge, 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20418. Papers are presented in The Bridge on the basis of general interest and time- liness. They reflect the views of the authors and not necessarily the position of the National Academy of Engineering. The Bridge is printed on recycled paper. © 2010 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
  • Characterisation of Intra-Hourly Wind Power Ramps at the Wind Farm Scale and Associated Processes

    Characterisation of Intra-Hourly Wind Power Ramps at the Wind Farm Scale and Associated Processes

    Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 131–147, 2021 https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-131-2021 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Characterisation of intra-hourly wind power ramps at the wind farm scale and associated processes Mathieu Pichault1, Claire Vincent2, Grant Skidmore1, and Jason Monty1 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia 2School of Earth Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia Correspondence: Mathieu Pichault ([email protected]) Received: 12 May 2020 – Discussion started: 5 June 2020 Revised: 15 September 2020 – Accepted: 8 December 2020 – Published: 19 January 2021 Abstract. One of the main factors contributing to wind power forecast inaccuracies is the occurrence of large changes in wind power output over a short amount of time, also called “ramp events”. In this paper, we assess the behaviour and causality of 1183 ramp events at a large wind farm site located in Victoria (southeast Australia). We address the relative importance of primary engineering and meteorological processes inducing ramps through an automatic ramp categorisation scheme. Ramp features such as ramp amplitude, shape, diurnal cycle and seasonality are further discussed, and several case studies are presented. It is shown that ramps at the study site are mostly associated with frontal activity (46 %) and that wind power fluctuations tend to plateau before and after the ramps. The research further demonstrates the wide range of temporal scales and behaviours inherent to intra-hourly wind power ramps at the wind farm scale. 1 Introduction hourly) ramp forecasts (Zhang et al., 2017; Cui et al., 2015; Gallego et al., 2015a).
  • Incorporating Renewables Into the Electric Grid: Expanding Opportunities for Smart Markets and Energy Storage

    Incorporating Renewables Into the Electric Grid: Expanding Opportunities for Smart Markets and Energy Storage

    INCORPORATING RENEWABLES INTO THE ELECTRIC GRID: EXPANDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR SMART MARKETS AND ENERGY STORAGE June 2016 Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 5 I. Technical and Economic Considerations in Renewable Integration .......................................................... 7 Characteristics of a Grid with High Levels of Variable Energy Resources ................................................. 7 Technical Feasibility and Cost of Integration .......................................................................................... 12 II. Evidence on the Cost of Integrating Variable Renewable Generation ................................................... 15 Current and Historical Ancillary Service Costs ........................................................................................ 15 Model Estimates of the Cost of Renewable Integration ......................................................................... 17 Evidence from Ancillary Service Markets................................................................................................ 18 Effect of variable generation on expected day-ahead regulation mileage......................................... 19 Effect of variable generation on actual regulation mileage ..............................................................
  • 5 Minute Wind Forecasting Challenge: Exelon and GE's Predix

    5 Minute Wind Forecasting Challenge: Exelon and GE's Predix

    The 5 Minute Wind Forecasting Challenge: Exelon and GE’s Predix At a Glance A move toward digital industrial transformation As a leading utility company with more than $31 billion in global Renewable Energy revenues in 2016 and over 32 gigawatts (GW) of total generation, Exelon knows the importance of taking a strategic view of digital transformation across its lines of business. Challenge Exelon sought to optimize wind power forecasting by predicting wind Exelon was developing strategies for managing its various generation ramp events, enabling the company to dispatch power that could not be assets across nuclear, fossil fuels, wind, hydro, and solar power as well monetized otherwise. The result is higher revenue for Exelon’s large-scale wind farm operations. as determining how it would leverage the enormous amount of data those assets would generate going forward. Solution GE and Exelon teams co-innovated to build a solution on Predix that In evaluating its strategies, the company reviewed its current increases wind forecasting accuracy by designing a new physical and statistical wind power forecast model that uses turbine data on-premises OT/IT infrastructure across its entire energy portfolio. together with weather forecasting data. This model now represents Business leaders looked at the system administration challenges the industry-leading forecasting solution (as measured by a substantial and costs they would face to maintain the current infrastructure, let reduction in under-forecasting). alone use it as a basis for driving new revenue across its business Results units. This assessment made digital transformation an even greater Exelon’s wind forecasting prediction accuracy grew signifcantly, enabling imperative, and inspired discussions about how Exelon could leverage higher energy capture valued at $2 million per year.
  • NAWEA 2015 Symposium Book of Abstracts

    NAWEA 2015 Symposium Book of Abstracts

    NAWEA 2015 Symposium Tuesday 09 June 2015 - Thursday 11 June 2015 Virginia Tech Campus Goodwin Hall Book of Abstracts i Table of contents Wind Farm Layout Optimization Considering Turbine Selection and Hub Height Variation ....................... 1 Graduate Education Programs in Wind Energy ................................................................................. 2 Benefits of vertically-staggered wind turbines from theoretical analysis and Large-Eddy Simulations ........... 3 On the Effects of Directional Bin Size when Simulating Large Offshore Wind Farms with CFD ................... 7 A game-theoretic framework to investigate the conditions for cooperation between energy storage operators and wind power producers ............................................................................................................ 9 Detection of Wake Impingement in Support of Wind Plant Control ....................................................... 11 Sensitivity of Wind Turbine Airfoil Sections to Geometry Variations Inherent in Modular Blades ................ 15 Exploiting the Characteristics of Kevlar-Wall Wind Tunnels for Conventional Aerodynamic Measurements with Implications for Testing of Wind Turbine Sections ...................................................................... 16 Spatially Resolved Wind Tunnel Wake Measurements at High Angles of Attack and High Reynolds Numbers Using a Laser-Based Velocimeter .................................................................................................... 17 Windtelligence:
  • The Green Economic Recovery: Wind Energy Tax Policy After Financial Crisis and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009

    The Green Economic Recovery: Wind Energy Tax Policy After Financial Crisis and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009

    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Oregon Scholars' Bank JEFFRY S. HINMAN∗ The Green Economic Recovery: Wind Energy Tax Policy After Financial Crisis and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009 I. The Benefits, Challenges, and Potential of the U.S. Wind Industry................................................................................... 39 A. Environmental Benefits of Wind...................................... 40 B. Economic Benefits of Wind ............................................. 41 1. Jobs and Economic Activity........................................ 41 2. Competitiveness with Traditional Power Plants ......... 43 C. Challenges for the Wind Energy Industry ......................... 44 1. Efficiency, Grid Access, and Intermittency ................ 44 2. Environmental Concerns and Local Opposition ......... 45 II. Federal Support for Renewable Energy Past and Present ....... 46 A. Renewable Energy Tax Policy 1978 to 1992 .................... 47 1. The National Energy Act of 1978 ............................... 48 2. Additional State-Level Tax Incentives in California During the 1980s ....................................... 50 3. The California Wind Boom......................................... 51 4. Shortcomings of the Wind Boom................................ 52 5. The Free Market Approach 1986 to 1992 ................... 53 ∗ J.D., University of Oregon School of Law, 2009; Editor-in-Chief, Journal of Environmental Law and Litigation, 2008–2009; Recipient, Tax Law Certificate of Completion; B.S., Oregon State University, 2002. I want to thank the editorial staff of the Journal of Environmental Law and Litigation for their friendship and masterful edits. I also want to extend my appreciation to the excellent tax law faculty at the University of Oregon, Professors Roberta Mann and Nancy Shurtz, for their guidance and feedback. Finally, and most importantly, I owe a huge debt of gratitude to my incredible wife Kathleen for her patience and support.
  • Jacobson and Delucchi (2009) Electricity Transport Heat/Cool 100% WWS All New Energy: 2030

    Jacobson and Delucchi (2009) Electricity Transport Heat/Cool 100% WWS All New Energy: 2030

    Energy Policy 39 (2011) 1154–1169 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Energy Policy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, Part I: Technologies, energy resources, quantities and areas of infrastructure, and materials Mark Z. Jacobson a,n, Mark A. Delucchi b,1 a Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-4020, USA b Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA article info abstract Article history: Climate change, pollution, and energy insecurity are among the greatest problems of our time. Addressing Received 3 September 2010 them requires major changes in our energy infrastructure. Here, we analyze the feasibility of providing Accepted 22 November 2010 worldwide energy for all purposes (electric power, transportation, heating/cooling, etc.) from wind, Available online 30 December 2010 water, and sunlight (WWS). In Part I, we discuss WWS energy system characteristics, current and future Keywords: energy demand, availability of WWS resources, numbers of WWS devices, and area and material Wind power requirements. In Part II, we address variability, economics, and policy of WWS energy. We estimate that Solar power 3,800,000 5 MW wind turbines, 49,000 300 MW concentrated solar plants, 40,000 300 MW solar Water power PV power plants, 1.7 billion 3 kW rooftop PV systems, 5350 100 MW geothermal power plants, 270 new 1300 MW hydroelectric power plants, 720,000 0.75 MW wave devices, and 490,000 1 MW tidal turbines can power a 2030 WWS world that uses electricity and electrolytic hydrogen for all purposes.
  • California's Energy Future

    California's Energy Future

    California’s Energy Future: The View to 2050 Summary Report May 2011 Jane C. S. Long (co-chair) LEGAL NOTICE This report was prepared pursuant to a contract between the California Energy Commission (CEC) and the California Council on Science and Technology (CCST). It does not represent the views of the CEC, its employees, or the State of California. The CEC, the State of California, its employees, contractors, and subcontractors make no warranty, express or implied, and assume no legal liability for the information in this report; nor does any party represent that the use of this information will not infringe upon privately owned rights. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would also like to thank the Stephen Bechtel Fund and the California Energy Commision for their contributions to the underwriting of this project. We would also like to thank the California Air Resources Board for their continued support and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for underwriting the leadership of this effort. COPYRIGHT Copyright 2011 by the California Council on Science and Technology. Library of Congress Cataloging Number in Publications Data Main Entry Under Title: California’s Energy Future: A View to 2050 May 2011 ISBN-13: 978-1-930117-44-0 Note: The California Council on Science and Technology (CCST) has made every reasonable effort to assure the accuracy of the information in this publication. However, the contents of this publication are subject to changes, omissions, and errors, and CCST does not accept responsibility for any inaccuracies that may occur. CCST is a non-profit organization established in 1988 at the request of the California State Government and sponsored by the major public and private postsecondary institutions of California and affiliate federal laboratories in conjunction with leading private-sector firms.
  • Battle Mountain RMP Scoping Report

    Battle Mountain RMP Scoping Report

    US Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Battle Mountain District Office, Nevada Resource Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement SCOPING SUMMARY REPORT JULY 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. S-1 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Purpose of and Need for the Resource Management Plan ................................................ 1-1 1.2 Description of the RMP Planning Area .................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Overview of Public Involvement Process ............................................................................... 1-4 1.4 Description of the Scoping Process ......................................................................................... 1-5 1.4.1 Newsletter and Mailing List ......................................................................................... 1-5 1.4.2 Press Release .................................................................................................................. 1-5 1.4.3 Project Website ............................................................................................................. 1-6 1.4.4 Scoping Open Houses .................................................................................................. 1-6 1.4.5 Notice of Intent ............................................................................................................