Chicago-Kent Law Review Volume 82 Issue 1 Symposium: 150th Anniversary of the Article 3 Dred Scott Decision December 2006 Thirteen Ways of Looking at Dred Scott Jack M. Balkin Sanford Levinson Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Jack M. Balkin & Sanford Levinson, Thirteen Ways of Looking at Dred Scott, 82 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 49 (2007). Available at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol82/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chicago-Kent Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. For more information, please contact
[email protected],
[email protected]. THIRTEEN WAYS OF LOOKING AT DRED SCOTT JACK M. BALKIN & SANFORD LEVINSON* I know noble accents And lucid inescapable rhythms; But I know, too, That the blackbird is involved In what I know. -Wallace Stevens, Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird INTRODUCTION Wallace Stevens found in the blackbird an inexhaustible source of dif- ferent perspectives. One could say the same of Dred Scott v. Sandford.' A full 150 years after it was handed down, Dred Scott still fascinates and bedevils constitutional theorists and political scientists. It is truly a classic case whose meaning seems magically to make itself relevant as new situa- tions and problems arise. No matter how much we think we understand the noble accents and inescapable rhythms of law and political science, we discover that Dred Scott, like the blackbird, is involved in what we know.