3200 East Foothill Boulevard Mixed Use Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

3200 East Foothill Boulevard Mixed Use Project 3200 East Foothill Boulevard Mixed Use Project Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment prepared by City of Pasadena Planning & Community Development 175 North Garfield Pasadena, California 91109 prepared with the assistance of Rincon Consultants, Inc. 250 East 1st Street, Suite 301 Los Angeles, California 90012 May 2018 Table of Contents Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Purpose of a Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment ............................................. 1 Project Summary ............................................................................................................................ 1 Statutory Background ..................................................................................................................... 2 Organization of the SCEA ................................................................................................................ 2 Project Information/Project Description ................................................................................................ 5 1. Project Title ......................................................................................................................... 5 2. Lead Agency Name and Address ......................................................................................... 5 3. Contact Person and Phone Number ................................................................................... 5 4. Project Location .................................................................................................................. 5 5. Project Sponsor’s Name and Address ................................................................................. 5 6. General Plan Designation .................................................................................................... 5 7. Zoning.................................................................................................................................. 5 8. Description of Project ......................................................................................................... 8 9. City of Pasadena Required Approvals ...............................................................................28 10. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting ..................................................................................29 11. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required ........................................................29 12. Cumulative Scenario .........................................................................................................29 Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Eligibility .........................................................33 1. Sustainable Communities Strategy Consistency Analysis .................................................33 2. Transit Priority Project Criteria Analysis ...........................................................................37 3. Incorporation of Feasible Mitigation Measures, Performance Standards, and Criteria from Prior Applicable EIRs ................................................................................................39 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected .........................................................................................40 Determination ......................................................................................................................................40 Environmental Checklist .......................................................................................................................43 1 Aesthetics ..........................................................................................................................43 2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources ..................................................................................47 3 Air Quality .........................................................................................................................49 4 Biological Resources ..........................................................................................................65 5 Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................75 6 Energy ...............................................................................................................................97 7 Geology and Soils ............................................................................................................103 8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions .............................................................................................109 9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ..................................................................................119 10 Hydrology and Water Quality .........................................................................................131 11 Land Use and Planning ....................................................................................................139 12 Mineral Resources ..........................................................................................................143 13 Noise ...............................................................................................................................145 14 Population and Housing ..................................................................................................167 Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment i City of Pasadena 3200 East Foothill Boulevard Mixed Use Project 15 Public Services .................................................................................................................173 16 Recreation .......................................................................................................................179 17 Transportation/Traffic ....................................................................................................181 18 Tribal Cultural Resources ................................................................................................197 19 Utilities and Service Systems ..........................................................................................201 20 Mandatory Findings of Significance ................................................................................209 References ..........................................................................................................................................213 Bibliography ................................................................................................................................213 List of Preparers ..........................................................................................................................218 Tables Table 1 Project Summary ................................................................................................................. 9 Table 2 Surrounding Land Uses .....................................................................................................29 Table 3 Consistency Analysis with the 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Community Strategy Policies ............................................................................................34 Table 4 Summary of Transit Services Within 0.5-Mile of the Project Site .....................................38 Table 5 Basin Attainment Status ...................................................................................................50 Table 6 SCAQMD LSTs Screening Thresholds for Construction (SRA-8) .......................................52 Table 7 Estimated Construction Emissions (lbs/day) ....................................................................61 Table 8 Estimated NOx (lbs/day) Emissions with Mitigation .........................................................61 Table 9 Estimated Operational Emissions (lbs/day) ......................................................................62 Table 10 Summary of Energy Use During Construction ..................................................................99 Table 11 Estimated Project-Related Annual Motor Vehicle Fuel Consumption ..............................99 Table 12 Estimated Project-Related Energy Usage Compared to State-Wide Energy Usage ........100 Table 13 Estimated Construction Emissions of Greenhouse Gases ..............................................113 Table 14 Combined Annual Emissions MT CO2e/year ...................................................................114 Table 15 Project Consistency with Applicable SCAG RTP/SCS Strategies ......................................115 Table 16 Project Consistency with Applicable Green City Action Plan Goals ................................116 Table 17 Minimum Set of BMPs for All Construction Sites ...........................................................136 Table 18 Project Noise Monitoring Results – AM Peak Hour ........................................................149 Table 19 Pasadena Noise Guidelines for Land Use Planning .........................................................151 Table 20 Multi-Family Interior Noise Standards ............................................................................152 Table 21 Groundborne Vibration Criteria for Sensitive Land Uses ................................................154 Table 22 Groundborne Vibration Levels for Construction Equipment ..........................................157 Table
Recommended publications
  • Rare Artifact Found on San Clemente Island Mass Communication Specialist 2Nd Class Shawnte Bryan July 16, 2013 (U.S
    Santa Cruz Archaeological Society Newsletter Rare Artifact Found on San Clemente Island Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Shawnte Bryan July 16, 2013 (U.S. Navy Story Number: NNS130716-29) The Navy discovered a significant prehistoric artifact 90 miles west of San Diego on San Clemente Island (SCI) located mid-island at a newly discovered archeological site. A boat effigy made of submarine volcano lava was spotted at the surface of the site during an archeology survey. The boat effigy represents a type of boat used by the California Indians who occupied the California Channels and adjacent southern California mainland at the time of the Spanish "discovery" in the AD 1500s. Dr. Andy Yatsko, Senior Archaeologist and Region Southwest Archaeologist for the Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest in San Diego, who has over 40 years experience in prehistoric and historic archaeology finds the boat effigy to be an uncommon find. "Boat effigies like the one found are exceedingly rare in the archaeological record, with this being my first one recovered during my 30 year tenure with SCI," said Dr. Yatsko [image courtesy U.S. Navy]. "Finding artifacts on the surface of archaeological sites at the island is not unusual, but a rare one like this is always exciting to come across." The effigy was created from submarine volcano lava. This lava differs from the lava that flows on the mainland because the vesicles are smaller, making it more brittle and more difficult to handle. “The vesicle volcanic material used is hard and brittle but somehow they were able to craft a fine little carving out of it to represent an important part of their culture," said Yatsko.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Ancient Plant Use and the Importance of Geophytes Among the Island Chumash of Santa Cruz
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Ancient Plant Use and the Importance of Geophytes among the Island Chumash of Santa Cruz Island, California A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology by Kristina Marie Gill Committee in charge: Professor Michael A. Glassow, Chair Professor Michael A. Jochim Professor Amber M. VanDerwarker Professor Lynn H. Gamble September 2015 The dissertation of Kristina Marie Gill is approved. __________________________________________ Michael A. Jochim __________________________________________ Amber M. VanDerwarker __________________________________________ Lynn H. Gamble __________________________________________ Michael A. Glassow, Committee Chair July 2015 Ancient Plant Use and the Importance of Geophytes among the Island Chumash of Santa Cruz Island, California Copyright © 2015 By Kristina Marie Gill iii DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to my Family, Mike Glassow, and the Chumash People. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to many people who have provided guidance, encouragement, and support in my career as an archaeologist, and especially through my undergraduate and graduate studies. For those of whom I am unable to personally thank here, know that I deeply appreciate your support. First and foremost, I want to thank my chair Michael Glassow for his patience, enthusiasm, and encouragement during all aspects of this daunting project. I am also truly grateful to have had the opportunity to know, learn from, and work with my other committee members, Mike Jochim, Amber VanDerwarker, and Lynn Gamble. I cherish my various field experiences with them all on the Channel Islands and especially in southern Germany with Mike Jochim, whose worldly perspective I value deeply. I also thank Terry Jones, who provided me many undergraduate opportunities in California archaeology and encouraged me to attend a field school on San Clemente Island with Mark Raab and Andy Yatsko, an experience that left me captivated with the islands and their history.
    [Show full text]
  • Assigned Deferred Area Map 2
    Senate District 28 - LIEU Deferred Areas d C n a 7 Ve a n r 2 t n ura e v B o Moorpark 134 li g ST O 159 Colorado a ST Sherman Oaks Studio City DeferCred Places: ol Gllendalle V ora 134 e do ST r 710 d ST d Bevu erly Glen 0 Universal City n g 1 a o r Mulh Mulh d F 1 olland oll B nd Dr and an i Mulholla Dr l g l Beverly Hills u o e lh r Mu 101 York o a N ¤£ i n c z Brentwood h o l i o y Fe l s n o s L 2 a ST C R C i a v (Hollywood Hills) 0 e r n 5 y 7 rs e y e 1 id t r B o § ¨ e a ¦ e ood n Hollyw t e C n v w R S e Paciyfic Palisaodes e d t k p l unse d Hollywood u 405 S n r M r o a e 4 ly s R s 3 C e L s ¦¨§ G t r iv e e le v Palor s Verdes Estates t Topanga il s S n m i d n S u e e i o d p West Hollywood 110 West Hollywood m t Melrose a u t ST e e l s SPark La2 Brea r v 6 n F e Bel Air u d S Beverly 2 16 a Sun x 170 ST s a ST e f t r i g Rancrinho Palos Verdes a 3rd p 27 F ST Beverrlly Hiilllls S Va W 6th St lley Wilshire RT olling Hills Brentwood H e e e v m 10 a A 6 p th Westwood t Whitworth Dr le x ¨§ h ¦ e t v a A f Rolling Hills Estates A r e v i s a e 10 un n a 1 S a F st t n 8 ¨§ Pico ¦ n t o o S h s a M t Santa Catalina Island ic r e avez p r V Cesar E Ch t e e 7 4 m B n t t e Pacific Palisades y b i h h s 2 l ce 6 o a n O th B r L n u R u to o n t San Clemente Island S o dy g n 1 M n i r ST 10 l r a 60 e n l t a A ST ta 2 n § s ¨ Sante a Monica o ¦ a n ti 5 7 o a F 2 E M 20 N a ¨§ Rodeo ¦ th 187 t ST n t S a n West Hollywood o S o t l o n i m 7 a r r 8 a 1 t 710 e M n V B e Westwood an ¨§ d ¦ er C in Santta Moniica 87 Culver
    [Show full text]
  • The People of Quinquina: San Clemente Island's Original
    The People of Quinquina: San Clemente Island's Original Inhabitants as Described in .Ethnohistoric Documents by John R. Johnson, M.A. Prepared for: Natural Resources Office Naval Air Station, North Island San Diego, CA 92135 Submitted by: Anthropology Department Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History 2559 Puesta del Sol Santa Barbara, CA 93105 February, 1988 The People of Quinquina: San Clemente Island's Original Inhabitants as Described in Ethnohistoric Documents John R. Johnson Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History February, 1988 Introduetion Not much has been published regarding the indigenous population of San Clemente Island. This primarily ls due to the paucity of surviving documents per- taining to the early years of the island's history following European contact. After a brief review of early European descriptions of San Clemente Island and its inhabi- tants, this report will focus on a virtually untapped source of information regarding San Clemente Island's Native American population: the mission records from the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Using the mission register data, some inferences may be made regarding social interaction between the Gabrielino islanders and the mainland, and the history of the acculturation of these people into European society may be reconstructed. Finally, the potential for tracing descendants of San Clemente islanders into the twentieth century will be considered. Early European De1eription1 of San Clemente bland and It1 Inhabitant• The first historic mention of San Clemente Island may be found in the 1543 summary of Cabrlllo's voyage prepared after the expedition's return to the port of Navidad on the west coast of Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Power Plant Evaluation Naval Auxiliary Landing Field, San Clemente Island, California
    December 2000 • NREL/SR-500-27527 Wind Power Plant Evaluation Naval Auxiliary Landing Field, San Clemente Island, California Period of Performance 24 September 1999—15 December 2000 T.L. Olsen and P.J. Gulman Tim Olsen Consulting Denver, Colorado E. McKenna National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden, Colorado National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 NREL is a U.S. Department of Energy Laboratory Operated by Midwest Research Institute ••• Battelle ••• Bechtel Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 December 2000 • NREL/SR-500-27527 Wind Power Plant Evaluation Naval Auxiliary Landing Field, San Clemente Island, California Period of Performance 24 September 1999—15 December 2000 T.L. Olsen and P.J. Gulman Tim Olsen Consulting Denver, Colorado E. McKenna National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden, Colorado NREL Technical Monitor: Ed McKenna Prepared under U.S. Department of Energy Interagency Agreement No. IAG-98-1449 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 NREL is a U.S. Department of Energy Laboratory Operated by Midwest Research Institute ••• Battelle ••• Bechtel Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds on San Clemente Island, As Part of Our Work Toward the Recovery of the Island’S Endangered Species
    WESTERN BIRDS Volume 36, Number 3, 2005 THE BIRDS OF SAN CLEMENTE ISLAND BRIAN L. SULLIVAN, PRBO Conservation Science, 4990 Shoreline Hwy., Stinson Beach, California 94970-9701 (current address: Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, 159 Sapsucker Woods Rd., Ithaca, New York 14850) ERIC L. KERSHNER, Institute for Wildlife Studies, 2515 Camino del Rio South, Suite 334, San Diego, California 92108 With contributing authors JONATHAN J. DUNN, ROBB S. A. KALER, SUELLEN LYNN, NICOLE M. MUNKWITZ, and JONATHAN H. PLISSNER ABSTRACT: From 1992 to 2004, we observed birds on San Clemente Island, as part of our work toward the recovery of the island’s endangered species. We increased the island’s bird list to 317 species, by recording many additional vagrants and seabirds. The list includes 20 regular extant breeding species, 6 species extirpated as breeders, 5 nonnative introduced species, and 9 sporadic or newly colonizing breeding species. For decades San Clemente Island had been ravaged by overgrazing, especially by goats, which were removed completely in 1993. Since then, the island’s vegetation has begun recovering, and the island’s avifauna will likely change again as a result. We document here the status of that avifauna during this transitional period of re- growth, between the island’s being largely denuded of vegetation and a more natural state. It is still too early to evaluate the effects of the vegetation’s still partial recovery on birds, but the beginnings of recovery may have enabled the recent colonization of small numbers of Grasshopper Sparrows and Lazuli Buntings. Sponsored by the U. S. Navy, efforts to restore the island’s endangered species continue—among birds these are the Loggerhead Shrike and Sage Sparrow.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Agenda Report
    Adjourned Meeting 09-29-20 Item 3.B.4. Council Agenda Report To: Mayor Pierson and the Honorable Members of the City Council Prepared by: Yolanda Bundy, Environmental Sustainability Director Approved by: Reva Feldman, City Manager Date prepared: September 9, 2020 Meeting date: September 29, 2020 Subject: Response to the Los Angeles County Grand Jury’s Report Entitled “A Diet for Landfills: Cutting Down on Food Waste” RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorize the Mayor to sign the City of Malibu’s response letter to the Los Angeles County Grand Jury’s report entitled “A Diet for Landfills: Cutting Down on Food Waste.” FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action. WORK PLAN: This item was not included in the Adopted Work Plan for Fiscal year 2020-2021. This is part of normal staff operations. DISCUSSION: In the State of California, civil grand juries are authorized to “investigate and report upon the operations, accounts, and records of the officers, department, functions, and the method or system of performing the duties of any such city or joint powers agency and make such recommendations as it may deem proper and fit.” (Cal. Penal Code 925(a)). On July 31, 2020, the Los Angeles County Grand Jury (Grand Jury) issued the report entitled “A Diet for Landfills: Cutting Down on Food Waste” (Report). In the Report, the Grand Jury identified several opportunities for supportive public policies that can incentivize and create avenues to increase food waste recycling and organic waste diversion rates. At the conclusion of the Report, the Grand Jury requested a response from the City of Malibu (City) to Recommendations 1.1, 1.3, 1.8, and 1.14.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Overview of Southern California Coastal Areas
    Geologic Overview of Southern California Coastal Areas Continental Margin Coastal & Offshore Faulting Geology of Offshore Islands Orange County Coastal Geology Sediment & Sedimentary Rock Long Shore Currents and Coastal Cells Depositional vs. Erosional Coastlines Geology of San Onofre Landslide and tsunami hazards Mark Bordelon Irvine Valley College Geology of Dana Point area March 2012 Subduction of the Farallon Plate 100 m.y. ago Continental Margins Where land meets the ocean Margins near plate boundaries are ―active.‖ Fig. 3.11 Margins far from plate boundaries are ―passive.‖ Physiographic Provinces of S. Calif. http://scamp.wr.usgs.gov/scgeo Rotation of Transverse Ranges Fritsche and Behl, 2008 Extension creates basins 20-30 m.y. ago Up block Up block Basin Offshore Faulting Newport-Inglewood Fault Zone Huntington Beach Oil Field (1920s) Offshore Islands – N. Channel Islands Four northern Channel Islands are an extension of the Santa Monica Mts. • San Miguel, Santa Rosa, Santa Cruz & Anacapa Islands • Geology consists of Miocene volcanic rocks: pillow basalts, lava flows, tuff • Islands were isolated from one another 12-10 y.b.p. when sea level rose Pygmy Mammoth on Santa Rosa Island Radiocarbon date = 13,000 years old Lower sea level created one large island, 5 miles from mainland Isolated when sea level rose 12,000 y.b.p. http://www.nps.gov/chis/pygmy.htm Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary http://www.cinms.nos.noaa.gov/ Offshore Islands – S. Channel Islands • Southern islands include Catalina, San Clemente, Santa Barbara and San Nicolas Islands • Remnants of up-faulted blocks • Marine Terraces well-developed on San Clemente Island Marine Terraces – San Clemente Island 25 terraces 2.8 m.y.
    [Show full text]
  • The Indians of Los Angeles County
    The Indians of Los Angeles County Hugo Reid at Rancho Santa Anita. SOUTHWEST MUSEUM PAPERS NUMBER TWENTY-ONE The Indians of Los Angeles County Hugo Reid's Letters of 1852 Edited and Annotated by ROBERT E. HEIZER SOUTHWEST MUSEUM HIGHLAND PARK, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90042 1968 Copyright 1968 SOUTHWEST MUSEUM LOS ANGELES, CALIF. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 68-8964 The Indians of Los Angeles County http://www.loc.gov/resource/calbk.007 Printed by SOUTHLAND PRESS, INC. v CONTENTS FORWORD, by Carl Schaefer Dentzel vii INTRODUCTION, by Robert F. Heizer 1 THE HUGO REID LETTERS (I - XXII) 7 NOTES 105 REFERENCES 137 ILLUSTRATIONS Hugo Reid at Rancho Santa Anita Frontispiece The Hugo Reid Adobe in 1938 xii Rogerio Rocha, Gabrielino Indian 6 Mrs. James Rosemyre, Gabrielino Indian 10 Jose Salvideo, Gabrielino Indian 18 Gabrielino Baskets 28 Gabrielino Throwing Sticks 62 Gabrielino Artifacts as Illustrated by Hoffman 104 MAP Territories of the Gabrielino and Adjoining Tribes End papers vii Foreword THE YEAR 1969 WILL MARK THE BICENTENNIAL OF THE settling of Alta California. Few areas on the face of the earth have witnessed changes as great as those made in California in the past 200 years. From an insignificant colony on the perimeter of the tremendous Spanish Empire in the New World, California has emerged as one of the most famous and significant spots on the entire globe -- a far cry from its humble beginnings in 1769. Of all the areas settled by Spain in North, Central and South America, California has undergone the greatest transformation. Not only has the state become first in population of the 50 United States of America, but several of its counties and cities are among the first in population and affluence as The Indians of Los Angeles County http://www.loc.gov/resource/calbk.007 well.
    [Show full text]
  • ROCKETEER Friday, November 24, 19611 ' 'United TEMI'emtuie$ Max
    Page Four THE ROCKETEER Friday, November 24, 19611 ' 'United TEMI'EMTUIE$ Max. MIn. Know Your College Faculty Dr. 8ujes to Attend fund Max. Min. Drive Lags Nov. 17_ 57 36 A series of background sketches on the four full-time Natl ARS Confab Nov. 18._ 55 27 instructors at Bakersfield College, China Lake, are sched­ ROCKETEER Nov. 19._ 57 25 Dr. Bujes, Radiological Consult~ let's Get Nov. 20__ 52 .048 uled for publication during the coming weeks. ant for the Propulsion Develop­ Nov. 21_ 58 .042- First in the series is Jacques P. Thiroux, English in­ ment Department, will attend the With It! . ...;;;.:.. .. •To: . Nov. 22- 60 30 Rocket Solid Propellant Conference structor, a-native Californian originally from Santa Mon­ to be held in Waco, Texas, cal'1y ica. next year. The American Rocket lIudd Go", EdItor OHice, Houllng Bldg., Top Deck Phon •• 7.1354, 7-2082, 7·1655 He attended University Hi g h their three boys, Mark, 7, Stephen, Society, sponsors of this annual School in West Los Angeles and 15, and Paul, 2 and one-half, al­ conference, have asked Dr. Bujes Vol. XVII, No. 46 U. S. Naval Ordnance Test Station, China Lake, California friday, November 24, 1961 later Pomona College in Clare­ though new to desert living, seem to preside as chairman for the se::!­ mont where he received his bach­ to be adjusting very nicely. sian relating to nondestructive elor of arts degree in English in testing. June, 1949. While at Pomona, he His research in the radiological NOTS Skytop Dedi~ation Marks also minored in drama, romance field have produced significant ad­ languages and music.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Central San Clemente Island, California
    PAUL M. MERIFIELD Lamar-Merifield, Geologists-Geopbysicists, 1)18 Second Street, Suite 27, Santa D. L. LAMAR J Monica, California 90401 M. L. STOUT Geology Department, California State College at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90032 Geology of Central San Clemente Island, California terraces. Terraces are poorly developed on the ABSTRACT northeastern slope of the island. Previous geo- Central San Clemente Island is underlain logic descriptions of San Clemente Island have primarily by nonmarine volcanic rocks. A been presented by Lawson (1893), Smith 1,200-ft core hole, drilled near sea level on the (1898), and Olmsted (1958). west coast of the island, penetrated a homo- As the initial phase of this study, two 4 sq mi geneous sequence of basaltic andesite flows areas surrounding Eel Point and Lost Point varying in thickness from 11 to 169 ft. Whole- (Fig. 2) were mapped in detail (scale: 1 in. to rock potassium-argon dates of samples taken 400 ft) to determine the suitability of these near the top and bottom of the core hole indi- locations for a Rock-Site installation (Merifield cate that the cored sequence was extruded in and Lamar, 1967). The Rock-Site concept and less than 1 m. y. during Miocene time. Uncon- its applications to offshore petroleum produc- formably overlying the andesitic flows are da- tion have been described by Austin (1966, citic flows reaching a total thickness of about 1967), and the related offshore geology is de- 300 ft. A distinctive volcanic breccia, which is scribed by Ridlon (1968). The remainder of in part of sedimentary origin, is commonly pre- the area shown on Figure 2 was mapped at 1 in.
    [Show full text]
  • South Pasadena Water Efficient Plant List
    South Pasadena Water Efficient Plant List www.SouthPasadenaCA.gov │ [email protected] This list of water efficient plants was created from the Water Use Classification of Landscape Species (WUCOLS) Project for the purposes of the South Pasadena Water Conservation Rebate Program. For the more information on the WUCOLS project, visit ucanr.edu/sites/WUCOLS/. This list was modified to only show plants in South Pasadena’s Sunset Climate Zone (Zone 21) that require Low (L) and Very Low (VL) water. Botanical Name Common Name Water 1 Abelmoschus manihot (Hibiscus manihot) sunset muskmallow L 2 Abutilon palmeri Indian mallow L 3 Acacia aneura mulga L 4 Acacia baileyana Bailey acacia L 5 Acacia boormanii Snowy River wattle L 6 Acacia constricta whitethorn acacia L 7 Acacia covenyi blue bush L 8 Acacia cultriformis knife acacia L 9 Acacia dealbata silver wattle L 10 Acacia decurrens green wattle L 11 Acacia glaucoptera clay wattle L 12 Acacia greggii catclaw acacia L 13 Acacia iteaphylla willow wattle L 14 Acacia longifolia Sydney golden wattle L 15 Acacia melanoxylon blackwood acacia L 16 Acacia redolens prostrate acacia L 17 Acacia saligna blue leaf wattle L 18 Acacia stenophylla eumong/shoestring acacia L 19 Acacia vestita hairy wattle L 20 Acacia willardiana palo blanco L 21 Acalypha californica copper leaf L 22 Achillea clavennae silvery yarrow L 23 Achillea filipendulina fern leaf yarrow L 24 Achillea millefolium (non-native hybrids) yarrow (non-native hybrids) L 25 Achillea millefolium (CA native cultivars) yarrow L 26 Acmispon glaber (Lotus scoparius) deer weed VL 27 Acmispon rigidus (Lotus rigidus) rock pea L 28 Adenanthos drummondii woolly bush L 29 Adenium obesum desert rose L 30 Adenostoma fasciculatum chamise VL 31 Adenostoma sparsifolium red shanks/ribbonwood VL 32 Aeonium spp.
    [Show full text]