DOCSLIB.ORG

Leadership, Message, and Rhetorical Style Dissertation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Leadership, Message, and Rhetorical Style Dissertation The Language of Cultural Policy Advocacy: Leadership, Message, and Rhetorical Style Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillments of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Brea M. Heidelberg, M.A. Graduate Program in Arts Administration, Education and Policy The Ohio State University 2013 Dissertation Committee: Margaret J. Wyszomirski, Advisor Wayne P. Lawson Gerald Kosicki Copyright by Brea Heidelberg 2013 Abstract Since the creation of the NEA in 1965, arts advocates have had an established venue, at the federal level, to advocate for favorable policy incomes, usually in the form of continued or increased public arts funding. Engaging in advocacy as part of a larger policymaking process requires actors inside and outside of government to employ various methods of persuasion. My dissertation explores some of these methods, particularly rhetorical techniques as a way to investigate policy change management. I employ theories from political science, public policy, and rhetoric to analyze advocacy arguments employed by NEA chairs. To conduct the study, I constructed a theoretical lens that provides a foundation, rooted in the policymaking process, that incorporates the importance of ideas and their rhetorical expression. This project explores the ideas used to construct arts-advocacy arguments, their rhetorical evolution, the various ways rhetorical leaders use them, and finally, how those arguments are used to create or manage policy change. Although some previous research discusses advocacy arguments, the role rhetoric plays in the strategic navigation of the policymaking process deserves additional scholarly attention. This is especially true in the specific context of public art funding. To date, research about arts advocacy has not provided a holistic view of the policymaking process, or of the range of advocacy arguments. By addressing both these gaps, though, I do not seek to imply a causal relationship between particular advocacy arguments and ii financial rewards. Instead, I identify and present themes in past arts-advocacy arguments to assist with the construction and deployment of future arts advocacy. iii Dedication To my best friend, Alex C. Wood, who, through random acts of support, never allowed me to feel guilty about my ambition. To my mother, who may not have always understood, but never doubted. iv Acknowledgments I would like to sincerely and humbly thank my committee for their help and guidance throughout this process. To Wayne Lawson, whose personal experience with my research, along with his unwavering support, was instrumental in my successful completion of my work. To Jerry Kosicki, whose interest in multiple, seemingly disparate pieces, or my work has provided me with insight into how my research could serve a larger audience. I would especially like to thank my advisor, Margaret Wyszomirski, for sharing her expertise and her insight. I would also like to thank Nan Johnson, whose teaching and expertise had a profound impact on the initial phases of my work. I also want to thank my family, whose support and pride has sustained me. Finally, I would like to thank the administrative loves of my life: Kirsten Thomas and Dawn Pickarski. Your non-judgmental support as I messed up forms, missed deadlines, and asked the same question multiple times will always be greatly appreciated. v Vita June 2002 ...................Winchester Thurston (high school) 2007............................B.S. Business Administration & B.A. International Area Studies (Drexel University) 2009............................MA Arts Policy and Administration 2012 to present ...........Assistant Professor, Arts Administration, Education and Policy, Department of Fine Arts, Rider University Publication Heidelberg, B. (2010). The need for arts researchers in arts organizations. The Journal of Arts Management, Law and Society, 40, 235–237. Field of Study Cultural Policy and Arts Management vi Table of Contents Abstract(......................................................................................................................................(ii( Dedication(.................................................................................................................................(iv( Acknowledgments(....................................................................................................................(v( Vita(..............................................................................................................................................(vi( List(of(Tables(...........................................................................................................................(xv( List(of(Figures(.......................................................................................................................(xvii( Introduction(..............................................................................................................................(1( Personal(Significance(.......................................................................................................................(1( Statement(of(the(Issue(.....................................................................................................................(3( Policy(Actors(.......................................................................................................................................(4( Policy(Arena(........................................................................................................................................(5( Policy(Entrepreneur(.........................................................................................................................(6( Related(Research(..............................................................................................................................(6( Conclusion(.........................................................................................................................................(12( Chapter(1:(Literature(Review(............................................................................................(13( Kingdon’s(MultiplePStreams(Framework(................................................................................(13( The(Problem(Stream(......................................................................................................................(16( The(Policy(Stream(...........................................................................................................................(18( vii The(Political(Stream(.......................................................................................................................(19( Policy(Windows(...............................................................................................................................(21( AdvocacyPCoalition(Framework(.................................................................................................(23( PunctuatedPEquilibrium(Theory(...............................................................................................(28( Combining(Theories(.......................................................................................................................(30( Guiding(Questions(...........................................................................................................................(32( Policy(Entrepreneurs(.....................................................................................................................(34( Policy(Entrepreneurs(and(Interest(Groups(............................................................................(38( Policy(Entrepreneurs(and(Rhetoric(..........................................................................................(42( Chapter(2:(Conceptual(Framework(.................................................................................(52( Typology(of(Rhetorical(Situations(.............................................................................................(63( Key(Concepts(....................................................................................................................................(69( Less$varied$coalitions$(square$1$and$2)$..............................................................................................$72$ Varied$coalitions$(squares$3$and$4$........................................................................................................$73$ Research(Goals(.................................................................................................................................(73( Chapter(3:(Defining(the(Political(Context(......................................................................(75( Timeline(Item(Rationale(...............................................................................................................(75( Policy(Analysis(Framework(and(Timeline(Construction(...................................................(76( Multiple<streams$framework$...................................................................................................................$76$ Advocacy<coalition$framework$...............................................................................................................$78$ Punctuated<equilibrium$theory$..............................................................................................................$78$ Actors(on(the(Timeline(..................................................................................................................(79(
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Correcting the Structural Defects in the National Endowment for the Arts
    Independence vs. Accountability: Correcting the Structural Defects in the National Endowment for the Arts Craig Alford Masbackt Politics has moved to center stage in the arts world. It has been almost twenty-seven years since Congress established the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) as part of the National Foundation on the Arts and Humanities Act of 1965 (Act).1 Since then, the NEA has faced a variety of challenges, but none like the one which unfolded during the last four years in Washington, D.C. During this time, the very existence of the organization has been at issue.2 Until the mid-1980s, the NEA enjoyed consistent, and only occasionally contested, congressional support as it distributed grants to arts organizations, state arts agencies, and individuals. As congressional appropriations grew from $2.5 million in 1966' to $175 million in 1991," the NEA saved dying ballet companies, launched programs to improve the teaching of poetry in schools, and helped start an American literary anthology. The NEA has achieved a significant decentralization in arts funding, education, and participation in the United States by encouraging the expansion in the number of state arts agen- cies.5 While the NEA was, theoretically, structured to be insulated from govern- ment control, the issue of the organization's independence has been central to t A.B. 1977 Princeton University. J.D. expected 1992, Yale Law School. I would like to thank Jameson W. Doig and Jerry L. Mashaw for their assistance with this project. 1. Pub. L. No. 89-209, 79 Stat. 845 (1965) (codified as amended at 20 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 13: “Fostering Civic Engagement Through the Arts: a Blueprint” by Devereaux
    Chapter 13: “Fostering Civic Engagement Through the Arts: A Blueprint” by DeVereaux Art Policy and Advocacy Policy Quest The aim of this assignment is for you to learn about some of the important issues, events, and individuals in the history of arts policy in the United States. At the same time, you will be gaining research skills that will help you improve your research capacity in this course and others. The questions posed are intentionally posed in a way that requires you to do research and a bit of problem-solving to figure out exactly what information in needed. With that said, in this assignment, you should find information to respond to the posed questions by any means you can! What that means is that it is not readily obvious how you should answer the questions, where you should go to find the answers, or what answers are required. As a graduate student, you will encounter similar situations when you are conducting research for papers and projects you will complete. The ability to develop your own research leads based on vague or ambiguous ideas has great value for this reason. Keep in mind that “research” does not just pertain to looking things up in books. As a researcher, you should begin to discover the multiple ways you can track down data. A savvy researcher might, in fact, begin with a subject librarian who can show ways to facilitate the search. Before beginning this assignment, note that: All questions relate to the fields of arts management and arts policy, so you should find answers for each that relate to these areas.
    [Show full text]
  • POLICY REVIEW: Is It Art Or Tax-Paid Obscenity? the NEA Controversy Jesse Helms
    Journal of Law and Policy Volume 2 | Issue 1 Article 3 1994 POLICY REVIEW: Is it Art or Tax-Paid Obscenity? The NEA Controversy Jesse Helms Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/jlp Recommended Citation Jesse Helms, POLICY REVIEW: Is it Art or Tax-Paid Obscenity? The NEA Controversy, 2 J. L. & Pol'y (1994). Available at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/jlp/vol2/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Law and Policy by an authorized editor of BrooklynWorks. IS IT ART OR TAX-PAID OBSCENITY? THE NEA CONTROVERSY Jesse Helms* America is in the midst of a cultural war. On one side are those of us who want to keep our nation rooted in Judeo-Christian morality. On the other, are those who would discard this traditional morality in favor of a radical moral relativism. It is nothing less than a struggle for the soul of our nation. How this controversy is resolved will determine whether America will succeed and prosper, or be left in the dust bin of history. That is why the use of taxpayers' dollars by the National Endowment for the Arts ("NEA") to subsidize offensive and obscene "art" -- in effect, to subsidize the efforts of moral relativ- ists to undermine America's Judeo-Christian heritage and morality -- is such a threat to the future of our nation. The role of the National Endowment for the Arts in this struggle first surfaced in 1989 when the agency awarded a grant -- and the stamp of public approval -- to Andres Serrano for his photograph of a crucifix in a vat of urine.
    [Show full text]
  • NEA Chronology Final
    THE NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE ARTS 1965 2000 A BRIEF CHRONOLOGY OF FEDERAL SUPPORT FOR THE ARTS President Johnson signs the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act, establishing the National Endowment for the Arts and the National Endowment for the Humanities, on September 29, 1965. Foreword he National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act The thirty-five year public investment in the arts has paid tremen­ Twas passed by Congress and signed into law by President dous dividends. Since 1965, the Endowment has awarded more Johnson in 1965. It states, “While no government can call a great than 111,000 grants to arts organizations and artists in all 50 states artist or scholar into existence, it is necessary and appropriate for and the six U.S. jurisdictions. The number of state and jurisdic­ the Federal Government to help create and sustain not only a tional arts agencies has grown from 5 to 56. Local arts agencies climate encouraging freedom of thought, imagination, and now number over 4,000 – up from 400. Nonprofit theaters have inquiry, but also the material conditions facilitating the release of grown from 56 to 340, symphony orchestras have nearly doubled this creative talent.” On September 29 of that year, the National in number from 980 to 1,800, opera companies have multiplied Endowment for the Arts – a new public agency dedicated to from 27 to 113, and now there are 18 times as many dance com­ strengthening the artistic life of this country – was created. panies as there were in 1965.
    [Show full text]
  • EXTENSIONS of REMARKS March 26, 1992 EXTENSIONS of REMARKS JOHN FROHNMAYER, OUTGOING Renew and Maintain Our Democracy, We Have Been a Great Age of Repression
    7322 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS March 26, 1992 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS JOHN FROHNMAYER, OUTGOING renew and maintain our democracy, we have been a great age of repression. And one of my CHAIRMAN OF THE NATIONAL the First Amendment. And one of the very favorites of this is Mannheirn, Germany, in ENDOWMENT FOR THE ARTS, nice things about the freedom of expression 1853, when the statue of Venus de Milo was DISCUSSES THE VITAL IMPOR­ calendar, which I have on my back desk, is put on trial for nudity and obscenity. This that everyday one can re-read the First was the statue herself, sitting up there with­ TANCE OF FREEDOM OF EXPRES­ Amendment, and so let me re-read it for you: out arms, and draped as you know. SION Congress shall make no law respecting an es­ The account does not tell us whether she tablishment of religion, or prohibiting the was read her rights, asked to testify, or even HON. TOM LANTOS free exercise thereof, or abridging the free­ if she'd been struck with a fit of modesty OF CALIFORNIA dom of speech or of the press or of the right how without arms she would have been able of the people peaceably to assemble and to to clothe herself. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES petition the government for a redress of Another notable example in the United Thursday, March 26, 1992 grievances. States, in the 1920s, the jazz age there was an Each generation must re-enfranchise both Mr. LANTOS. Mr. Speaker, on Monday, anti-jazz movement to censor this form of our democracy and the First Amendment.
    [Show full text]
  • Arts Advocacy and the National Endowment for The
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. ProQuest Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor. Ml 48106-1346 USA 800*521-0600 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with with permission permission of the of copyright the copyright owner. owner.Further reproductionFurther reproduction prohibited without prohibited permission. without permission. ARTS ADVOCACY AND THE NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE ARTS: FORGING AN EFFECTIVE PARTNERSHIP by Jungmo Kang submitted to the Faculty of the College of Aits and Science of American University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Aits in Aits Management Robert Goler Brett A.
    [Show full text]
  • Stories of Experts and Influence: a Discourse Analytic Approach to Bureaucratic Autonomy in the Cold War Era
    Stories of Experts and Influence: A Discourse Analytic Approach to Bureaucratic Autonomy in the Cold War Era Jessica Snow Wirgau Dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In Public Administration and Public Affairs Brian J. Cook, Chair Karen M. Hult Laura S. Jensen Patrick S. Roberts May 14, 2014 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: bureaucratic autonomy, discourse analysis, narrative, storyline, Cold War Copyright, 2014 Stories of Experts and Influence: A Discourse Analytic Approach to Bureaucratic Autonomy in the Cold War Era Jessica Snow Wirgau Abstract Government agencies exercise bureaucratic autonomy when they are able to pursue their goals independent, and sometimes in defiance, of political superiors. Over the last three decades, research in the area of bureaucratic autonomy has provided numerous examples of relatively autonomous agencies and has generally recognized the desire of administrators to carve out greater autonomy for their organizations, but the question of how administrators consciously or unconsciously pursue autonomy remains a rich and largely unexplored area of research. Most theories of bureaucratic autonomy typically fall into two categories: an autonomy based on task-specificity that is contingent on the function and expertise of the organization and the ability of the agency to accept or reject new tasks; and a reputation-based autonomy contingent on the ability of the agency to build and maintain a constituency and to secure a reputation for effectiveness that makes it politically difficult for elected officials to influence agency action. This study applies a discourse analytic approach to the study of autonomy in two agencies established during the Cold War whose primary function is the distribution of federal grants-in-aid: the National Endowment for the Arts and the National Institute of Mental Health.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Group Proceedings
    1 Working Group Proceedings October 21, 2019. Corvallis, Oregon. Creating Healthy Communities: Arts + Public Health in America Presented by Oregon State University and the University of Florida Center for Arts in Medicine, in partnership with ArtPlace America and a2ru. 2 Acknowledgements We would like to extend our gratitude to all who contributed to the success of this ninth working group, in particular: 3 Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 Agenda ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 Working Group Participants ............................................................................................................................... 8 Performance, Welcome, Introductions & Overview ............................................................................................. 10 Keynote Address: We Were Present at the Revolution and Missed It .................................................................... 12 Presentation: What Arts & Culture Can Do for Community Health ....................................................................... 13 Presentation: How Land Grant Universities Work in Communities ........................................................................ 14 Practice Model PechaKucha Presentations .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mapplethorpe, Cultural Crisis, and the NEA
    Colby College Digital Commons @ Colby Undergraduate Research Symposium (UGRS) Student Research 2006 Socio-cultural Degeneration and State Patronage of the Arts: Mapplethorpe, Cultural Crisis, and the NEA Greyson C. Brooks Colby College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/ugrs Part of the Art Practice Commons, and the Other Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Brooks, Greyson C., "Socio-cultural Degeneration and State Patronage of the Arts: Mapplethorpe, Cultural Crisis, and the NEA" (2006). Undergraduate Research Symposium (UGRS). 5. https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/ugrs/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at Digital Commons @ Colby. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Research Symposium (UGRS) by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Colby. G. C. Brooks AY 452 Besteman Greyson C. Brooks 19th May 2006 Anthropology 452 Final Research Paper Professor Besteman Socio-cultural Degeneration and State Patronage of the Arts: Mapplethorpe, Cultural Crisis, and the NEA God forbid we ever have a government policy for the arts, per se. That would remind me of Nazi Germany, or something of that sort, where the government sets what the policy should be. It should not. - Senator Claiborne Pell, Chairman of the Subcommittee of Education, Arts and the Humanities of the Committee on Labor and Human Resources, June 26th, 1979; as quoted in (Henderson 2005: 29). If the Endowment is to survive, we will have to start making legislative distinctions between the preservation and dissemination of time-tested art treasures… and contemporary art still in the aesthetic laboratory, which will have to be supported by private foundations and patrons.
    [Show full text]
  • George Bush Library - Staff and Office Files) NLGB Control # White House Office White House Staff Member Document Type Subject Pages Restriction(S)
    P-2/P-5 Document Report (George Bush Library - Staff and Office Files) NLGB Control # White House Office White House Staff Member Document Type Subject Pages Restriction(s) 2816 Cabinet Affairs, Office of Bates, David Q., Jr. Memo From David Q. Bates to Governor Sununu 1 P-5 RE: NEA Reauthorization 2817 Cabinet Affairs, Office of Bates, David Q., Jr. Memo From Lynne V. Cheney to David Q. Bates 2 P-5 RE: NEA and Content Restrictions 2818 Cabinet Affairs, Office of Bates, David Q., Jr. Memo From David Q. Bates to John Frohnmayer 1 P-5 RE: NEA Grant Process 2819 Cabinet Affairs, Office of Bates, David Q., Jr. Memo From Lynne V. Cheney to David Q. Bates 2 P-5 RE: NEA and Content Restrictions 2820 Cabinet Affairs, Office of Blumenthal, Gary Memorandum with Ken Yale to Dick Thornburgh 4 P-5 Attachment re: Proposed Working Group on Responsible Budget 2821 Cabinet Affairs, Office of Calio, Nicholas E. Memo Nicholas Calio to Fred McClure and Roger Porter 3 P-5 re: Modification of Administration's Position on Minimum Wage Page 1 of 145 P-2/P-5 Document Report (George Bush Library - Staff and Office Files) NLGB Control # White House Office White House Staff Member Document Type Subject Pages Restriction(s) 2824 Cabinet Affairs, Office of Casse, Daniel Memo From Daniel Casse to Ede Holiday 1 P-5 RE: Suit Filed Against the NEA's General Counsel 2825 Cabinet Affairs, Office of Casse, Daniel Memo From Daniel Casse to Ede Holiday 1 P-5 RE: Suit Filed Against the NEA's General Counsel 2827 Cabinet Affairs, Office of Casse, Daniel Memo From Daniel Casse to Ede Holiday 1 P-5 RE: Justice Department and the National Endowment for the Arts 2829 Cabinet Affairs, Office of Casse, Daniel Letter From John E.
    [Show full text]
  • Turmoil at the National Endowment for the Arts: Can Federally Funded Act Survive the "Mapplethorpe Controversy" ?
    Buffalo Law Review Volume 39 Number 1 Article 6 1-1-1991 Turmoil at the National Endowment for the Arts: Can Federally Funded Act Survive the "Mapplethorpe Controversy" ? MaryEllen Kresse Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/buffalolawreview Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the First Amendment Commons Recommended Citation MaryEllen Kresse, Turmoil at the National Endowment for the Arts: Can Federally Funded Act Survive the "Mapplethorpe Controversy" ?, 39 Buff. L. Rev. 231 (1991). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/buffalolawreview/vol39/iss1/6 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Buffalo Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMMENTS Turmoil at the National Endowment for the Arts: Can Federally Funded Art Survive the "Mapplethorpe Controversy" ? If it is true that "one [person's] vulgarity is another's lyric,"' is it equally true that one person's obscenity is another's art? The United States Congress, caught up in the controversy surround- ing the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), has indicated that it is not true-at least not when the "art"/"obscenity" is federally funded. The National Endowment for the Arts has been in a precarious posi- tion since June 1989, when several controversial grants resulted in legis- lation to restrict its funding and study its grant making process.2 Tom between the artists who benefit from its grant money and the legislature that controls its funding and continued existence, the NEA struggled to maintain its equilibrium and a semblance of political independence 1.
    [Show full text]
  • DATE DOWNLOADED: Tue Sep 1 11:35:41 2020 SOURCE: Content Downloaded from Heinonline
    DATE DOWNLOADED: Tue Sep 1 11:35:41 2020 SOURCE: Content Downloaded from HeinOnline Citations: Bluebook 21st ed. Ronald K. L. Collins, Hans Linde and His 1984 Judicial Election: The Primary, 70 OR. L. REV. 747 (1991). ALWD 6th ed. Collins, R. K., Hans linde and his 1984 judicial election: The primary, 70(4) Or. L. Rev. 747 (1991). APA 7th ed. Collins, R. K. (1991). Hans linde and his 1984 judicial election: The primary. Oregon Law Review, 70(4), 747-814. Chicago 7th ed. Ronald K. L. Collins, "Hans Linde and His 1984 Judicial Election: The Primary," Oregon Law Review 70, no. 4 (Winter 1991): 747-814 McGill Guide 9th ed. Ronald KL Collins, "Hans Linde and His 1984 Judicial Election: The Primary" (1991) 70:4 Or L Rev 747. MLA 8th ed. Collins, Ronald K. L. "Hans Linde and His 1984 Judicial Election: The Primary." Oregon Law Review, vol. 70, no. 4, Winter 1991, p. 747-814. HeinOnline. OSCOLA 4th ed. Ronald K L Collins, 'Hans Linde and His 1984 Judicial Election: The Primary' (1991) 70 Or L Rev 747 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at https://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your license, please use: Copyright Information RONALD K.L. COLLINS• Hans Linde and His 1984 Judicial Election: The Primary Linde hides behind the court's opinions, asserting they are not his own and refuses to discuss the political and social agenda he would inflicton our state.
    [Show full text]