Vedi Napoli E Poi Muori: See Naples and Die

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Vedi Napoli E Poi Muori: See Naples and Die Carlotta de Bellis Trinity University Caravaggio and Artemisia December 12, 2019 Vedi Napoli e poi muori: See Naples and Die In 1606 Caravaggio did something that completely changed the course of his life: he killed a man. Throughout the entirety of his career, the artist was known for his explosive temper, but this irrational action was the last straw. After murdering Ranuccio Tomassoni in a tavern fight on May 29th, Caravaggio had to flee Rome, the city in which he was so well established.1 He spent his last years on the run escaping from Pope Paul V Borghese’s condemnation.2 The artist initially found refuge near Naples, where he was protected by Costanza Colonna Sforza. Then he made his way through Naples, Malta, and Sicily hoping one day to return to Rome.3 We know that Caravaggio’s Neapolitan sojourn divides itself into two different stays. The first stay in 1606-07 showcases the hospitable atmosphere he found in the city of Naples. During his second stay in 1609-10, just before his death, we encounter the artist prepared to return to Rome, having received papal pardon. During this later period, discussed more fully below, inclusion of possible self-portraits in some of the works of his Neapolitan period further demonstrate Caravaggio’s self-confidence and willingness to desist during what must have been challenging times. Caravaggio spent eighteen months in Naples, during two stays, producing six known works. The artist and the city share turbulent fame.4 Naples’ unique and mysterious charm fascinated Caravaggio, and surely the city might have given the artist inspiration for his late artistic production. Caravaggio’s character fit well with the crude reality that the city of Naples had to offer. His own body of work was not the only thing that benefited: Caravaggio was inspired by the evocative and infamous city, but his final works also left an important artistic legacy to the city of Naples and influenced its newly established pictorial school in the years to come. This period of the artist’s life is often believed to be very dark and desolate. However in Naples, the first destination of his escape journey, he found a very similar parallel to his raucous demeanor that seemed quite stimulating for the artist. Caravaggio and the city of Naples reacted to one another in a synergistic way. The 2019 exhibition Caravaggio: Napoli, which took place at the Museo di Capodimonte, was structured after this topic. This makes his Neapolitan period more significant from what it is usually considered to be. During his time in the city, he produced a considerable amount of artworks, which were private commissions either from churches or elite families, and are considered to be his late masterpieces. 1 Cassani, Silvia, and Maria Sapio. Caravaggio: the Final Years. (Napoli: Electa, 2004), 16. 2 Graham-Dixon, Andrew, and Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio. Caravaggio : A Life Sacred and Profane. W.W. Norton, 2011. 3 Marini, Maurizio. "L'alfa E L'omega Di Michelangelo Merisi Da Caravaggio, Pittore: Qualche Precisazione Documentaria Sulla Nascita E Sulla Morte." Artibus Et Historiae 20, no. 40 (1999): 131. 4 Marshall, Christopher R. Baroque Naples and the industry of painting: the world in the workbench. 2016. the Seicento is in fact a turbulent time in Naples as in the middle of the century there will be a revolt led by Masaniello against the Spanish viceroy. Second Time’s a Charm The paintings that exemplify Caravaggio’s stay in Naples and the transition of his style amidst his two Neapolitan periods are: The Flagellation (1607) at Capodimonte and The Seven Acts of Mercy 1607) of the Church of Pio Monte della Misericordia. These two paintings pertain to Caravaggio’s first stay in the city. The Martyrdom of St. Ursula (1610) at Palazzo Zevallos was executed during the artist’s second stay in the city and is considered to be his last painting. It is important to note that all three works were private commissions, and that the artist carefully crafted them for his patrons. Thus, Caravaggio responded to the needs of the art market in a very modern sense. Caravaggio’s Neapolitan period was re-evaluated in the second half of the 20th century by Roberto Longhi and Ferdinando Bologna, who wrote L’Incredulità del Caravaggio (2006). For many years it was thought that Caravaggio spent a little less than a year in the city of Naples and produced six very different paintings. However, today it is known that Caravaggio died in 1610. This confirms the existence of his second stay and doubles the amount of time that the artist spent in the city of Naples.5 This longer stay also amplifies the influence of the city on the artist and the legacy that Caravaggio left to Naples after his death. During his first period in Naples he produced three great altarpieces: The Seven Acts of Mercy, The Flagellation and The Madonna of the Rosary currently at the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna.6-7 These pieces diverge stylistically from one another. At first glance one could almost say they were executed by different hands. During his second period in 1610, Caravaggio, while awaiting for papal forgiveness, painted The Denial of Saint Peter at the MET, Villa Borghese’s John the Baptist and Martyrdom of Saint Ursula. This latter period is more cohesive in style, and is distinguishable by a pervasive dark tonality and a greater narrative concision, which become a synthesis of his pictorial vocabulary.8 There is a distinction to be made not only between Caravaggio’s first and second period in Naples, but also among some of the works of the first period that demonstrate a transformation in his figural types, given by the greater emphasis provided by a thicker impasto, and the beginning of a more intense type of darkness, which is characteristic throughout the entirety of his second Neapolitan stay.9 Mythicizing His Death 5 In the Neapolitan Exhibition of 2019 works by Battistello Caracciolo, Louis Finson, Massimo Stanzione, Filippo Vitale artists who were very influenced by the Neapolitan Caravaggio. 6 Whitfield, Clovis, and Jane Martineau. Painting in Naples 1606-1705: From Caravaggio to Giordano. (New York, N.Y.: Alpine Fine Arts Collection, 1982), 37. 7 It was demonstrated in the 2019 Neapolitan Catalogue that Vienna’s Madonna of the Rosary was realized in Naples. Previously many scholars attributed this work to Caravaggio’s late Roman period. 8 Cassani, 2004: 142. 9 Bellori, Giovanni Pietro, Alice Sedgwick Wohl, Hellmut Wohl, and Tomaso Montanari. The lives of the modern painters, sculptors and architects. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009) Bellori in Caravaggio’s biography writes “Risentito di oscuri gagliardi servendosi assai del nero per dar rilievo a li corpi.” 2 It is often said that Caravaggio died in quite a dramatic way: alone, as a fugitive, and under the blazing sun on the shore of Porto Ercole after contracting malaria. However, much information regarding his final years is speculative or even fictionalized.10 Thanks to Vincenzo Pacelli’s discoveries and translations of the archival materials today we are able to have a more accurate chronology of the time the artist spent in Naples.11 Even though Bellori, was the most comprehensive of his biographers, he only briefly mentions his stay in Naples and his first commission there. Bellori’s distance in time gave him a more ample sense of the artist's life in retrospect, but at the same time this granted him greater authorial agency in his biography. Bellori, by anticipating Caravaggio’s death by a year in 1609 - the same year of Annibale Carracci’s and Federico Zuccari’s deaths - does not cover his return to Naples for ten months.12 This altered quite significantly the reconstruction of his life, and our understanding of his final years. Perhaps, the anticipated death was an expediency used by the biographer to dramatize the event even more, making 1609 the year when the world lost three great artists.13 Caravaggio’s Heirs Caravaggio was welcomed by Naples and had a successful career there, especially during his first stay. As Mina Gregori argues in her essay, “in the broader sense Neapolitan painters were the heirs of Caravaggio.” 14 After the artist’s death, the city’s artistic scene was attracted by the effect of Caravaggio’s mundane subject matter, and the emotional charge he imbued in each of his canvases. His influence is proven by the fact that his arrival in Naples, in 1606, marks the start of the Baroque era for the city, which is considered to end in 1705 with the death of Neapolitan painter Luca Giordano, whose master, Jusepe de Ribera, was influenced by Caravaggio. 10 Sohm, Philip. "Caravaggio's Deaths." The Art Bulletin 84, no. 3 (2002): 449-68. Many accounts summarize and make sense of the life of Caravaggio, and even more are written about his death. In these narratives, historical veracity is not the authors’ first concern, but rather, a story that sounds plausible and fits best with our imagination of the eccentric artist is created. Sohm wants to prove how different biographers crafted the narration of Caravaggio’s death (and consequently his life) in order to characterize how they talked about the artist’s style. These fictional verisimilitudes made his death a basis for their art criticism and understanding of the artist. 11 Pacelli, Vincenzo. Caravaggio, le sette opere di misericordia. (Salerno:1984), 10/17. 12 The Cerasi Chapel is only instance where Caravaggio and Carracci work, separately, on the same commission in the church of Santa Maria del Popolo, Rome. 13 Bellori, Giovanni.
Recommended publications
  • GALLERIA GIAMBLANCO DIPINTI ANTICHI Venticinque Anni Di Attività
    GALLERIA GIAMBLANCO GALLERIA GIAMBLANCO DIPINTI ANTICHI Venticinque anni di attività La GALLERIA GIAMBLANCO, fondata a Torino nel 1993 La Galleria Giamblanco di Torino festeggia da Deborah Lentini e Salvatore Giamblanco, da oltre venticinque anni offre ai suoi clienti dipinti di grandi maestri italiani e stranieri con questo catalogo i suoi primi venticinque anni dal Cinquecento al primo Novecento, attentamente selezionati per qualità e rilevanza storico-artistica, avvalendosi di attività, proponendo al pubblico un’ampia selezione della consulenza dei migliori studiosi. di dipinti dal XV al XIX secolo. Tra le opere più importanti si segnalano inediti di Nicolas Régnier, Mattia Preti, Joost van de Hamme, Venticinque anni di attività Gioacchino Assereto, Cesare e Francesco Fracanzano, Giacinto Brandi, Antonio Zanchi e di molti altri artisti di rilievo internazionale. Come di consueto è presentata anche una ricca selezione di autori piemontesi del Sette e dell’Ottocento, da Vittorio Amedeo Cignaroli a Enrico Gamba, tra cui i due bozzetti realizzati da Claudio Francesco Beaumont per l’arazzeria di corte sabauda, che vanno a completare la serie oggi conservata al Museo Civico di Palazzo Madama di Torino. Catalogo edito per la Galleria Giamblanco da 2017-2018 In copertina UMBERTO ALLEMANDI e 26,00 Daniel Seiter (Vienna, 1647 - Torino, 1705), «Diana e Orione», 1685 circa. GALLERIA GIAMBLANCO DIPINTI ANTICHI Venticinque anni di attività A CURA DI DEBORAH LENTINI E SALVATORE GIAMBLANCO CON LA COLLABORAZIONE DI Alberto Cottino Serena D’Italia Luca Fiorentino Simone Mattiello Anna Orlando Gianni Papi Francesco Petrucci Guendalina Serafinelli Nicola Spinosa Andrea Tomezzoli Denis Ton Catalogo edito per la Galleria Giamblanco da UMBERTO ALLEMANDI Galleria Giamblanco via Giovanni Giolitti 39, Torino tel.
    [Show full text]
  • The Collecting, Dealing and Patronage Practices of Gaspare Roomer
    ART AND BUSINESS IN SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY NAPLES: THE COLLECTING, DEALING AND PATRONAGE PRACTICES OF GASPARE ROOMER by Chantelle Lepine-Cercone A thesis submitted to the Department of Art History In conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada (November, 2014) Copyright ©Chantelle Lepine-Cercone, 2014 Abstract This thesis examines the cultural influence of the seventeenth-century Flemish merchant Gaspare Roomer, who lived in Naples from 1616 until 1674. Specifically, it explores his art dealing, collecting and patronage activities, which exerted a notable influence on Neapolitan society. Using bank documents, letters, artist biographies and guidebooks, Roomer’s practices as an art dealer are studied and his importance as a major figure in the artistic exchange between Northern and Sourthern Europe is elucidated. His collection is primarily reconstructed using inventories, wills and artist biographies. Through this examination, Roomer emerges as one of Naples’ most prominent collectors of landscapes, still lifes and battle scenes, in addition to being a sophisticated collector of history paintings. The merchant’s relationship to the Spanish viceregal government of Naples is also discussed, as are his contributions to charity. Giving paintings to notable individuals and large donations to religious institutions were another way in which Roomer exacted influence. This study of Roomer’s cultural importance is comprehensive, exploring both Northern and Southern European sources. Through extensive use of primary source material, the full extent of Roomer’s art dealing, collecting and patronage practices are thoroughly examined. ii Acknowledgements I am deeply thankful to my thesis supervisor, Dr. Sebastian Schütze.
    [Show full text]
  • Encyklopédia Kresťanského Umenia Cár - Pozri Jurodiví/Blázni V Kristu; Rusko
    Marie Žúborová - Němcová: Encyklopédia kresťanského umenia cár - pozri jurodiví/blázni v Kristu; Rusko Georges Becker: Korunovácia cára Alexandra III. a cisárovnej Márie Fjodorovny Heslo CAR – CARI Strana 1 z 39 Marie Žúborová - Němcová: Encyklopédia kresťanského umenia N. Nevrev: Roman Veľký prijíma veľvyslanca pápeža Innocenta III (1875) Cár kolokol - Expres: zvon z počiatku 17.st. odliaty na príkaz cára Borisa Godunova (1552-1605); mal 36 ton; bol zavesený v štvormetrovej výške a rozhojdávalo ho 12 ľudí; počas jedného z požiarov spadol a rozbil sa; roku 1654 z jeho ostatkov odlial ruský majster Danilo Danilov ešte väčší zvon; o rok neskoršie zvon praskol úderom srdca; ďalší nasledovník Cára kolokola bol odliaty v Kremli; 24 rokov videl na provizórnej konštrukcii; napokon sa našiel majster, ktorému trvalo deväť mesiacov, kým ho zdvihol na Uspenský chrám; tam zotrval do požiaru roku 1701, keď spadol a rozbil sa; dnešný Cár kolokol bol formovaný v roku 1734, ale odliaty až o rok neskoršie; plnenie formy kovom trvalo hodinu a štvrť a tavba trvala 36 hodín; keď roku 1737 vypukol v Moskve požiar, praskol zvon pri nerovnomernom ochladzovaní studenou vodou; trhliny sa rozšírili po mnohých miestach a jedna časť sa dokonca oddelila; iba tento úlomok váži 11,5 tony; celý zvon váži viac ako 200 ton a má výšku 6m 14cm; priemer v najširšej časti je 6,6m; v jeho materiáli sa okrem klasickej zvonoviny našli aj podiely zlata a striebra; viac ako 100 rokov ostal zvon v jame, v ktorej ho odliali; pred rokom 2000 poverili monumentalistu Zuraba Cereteliho odliatím nového Cára kolokola, ktorý mal odbiť vstup do nového milénia; myšlienka však nebola doteraz zrealizovaná Caracallove kúpele - pozri Rím http://referaty.atlas.sk/vseobecne-humanitne/kultura-a-umenie/48731/caracallove-kupele Heslo CAR – CARI Strana 2 z 39 Marie Žúborová - Němcová: Encyklopédia kresťanského umenia G.
    [Show full text]
  • Cabanel, Alexandre Cabaret Voltaire Storia Dell'arte Einaudi
    C Cabanel, Alexandre (Montpellier 1823 - Parigi 1889). Ottenne il prix de Rome nel 1845; entrò nell’Institut de France nel 1863. Eseguí ri- tratti di bellissima qualità (Alfred Bruyas, 1840: conservato a Montpellier; Catharine Lorillard Wolfe, 1876: New York, mma) e tele mitologiche abilmente impostate, in cui privi- legia la raffigurazione di nudi femminili in stile pompier (Na- scita di Venere, 1863: Parigi, Louvre). I suoi celebri quadri di storia (il Riposo di Ruth, 1866: già coll. dell’imperatrice Eugenia; Morte di Francesca da Rimini e di Paolo Malatesta, 1870: Amiens, Museo di Piccardia), dalla composizione stu- diata, dalla fattura esatta, ricchi di accurati dettagli icono- grafici, sono talvolta declamatori e popolati di eroine da tea- tro (Fedra, 1880: conservato a Montpellier). Realizzò a Pa- rigi numerose decorazioni murali per palazzi privati (hôtel Pereire, 1858-64; hôtel de Say, 1861) e, per il Panthéon, Vi- ta di san Luigi (1878). Ricevette numerosi incarichi da Na- poleone III e da sovrani stranieri (il Paradiso perduto, 1867 (dipinto per il re di Baviera): Monaco, Maximilianum) e svol- se un ruolo notevole nella direzione del salon ufficiale sotto il secondo impero, opponendosi fortemente agli impressio- nisti. (tb). Cabaret Voltaire L’antica birreria Meiereie, posta al n. 1 della Spiegelgasse a Zurigo, fu la culla del movimento Dada. Qui infatti Hugo Ball e la sua amica Emmy Hemmings aprirono un «cabaret artistico», che era insieme club, galleria e teatro, e che fu inaugurato il 5 febbraio 1916 con il concorso di Jean Arp, Marcel Janco e T. Tzara. Vi si tennero concerti «brutisti», «poesie simultanee», mostre cui presero parte, in particola- Storia dell’arte Einaudi re, Arp, Janco, Macke, Marinetti, Modigliani, Picasso, Slodki.
    [Show full text]
  • Caravaggio, Second Revised Edition
    CARAVAGGIO second revised edition John T. Spike with the assistance of Michèle K. Spike cd-rom catalogue Note to the Reader 2 Abbreviations 3 How to Use this CD-ROM 3 Autograph Works 6 Other Works Attributed 412 Lost Works 452 Bibliography 510 Exhibition Catalogues 607 Copyright Notice 624 abbeville press publishers new york london Note to the Reader This CD-ROM contains searchable catalogues of all of the known paintings of Caravaggio, including attributed and lost works. In the autograph works are included all paintings which on documentary or stylistic evidence appear to be by, or partly by, the hand of Caravaggio. The attributed works include all paintings that have been associated with Caravaggio’s name in critical writings but which, in the opinion of the present writer, cannot be fully accepted as his, and those of uncertain attribution which he has not been able to examine personally. Some works listed here as copies are regarded as autograph by other authorities. Lost works, whose catalogue numbers are preceded by “L,” are paintings whose current whereabouts are unknown which are ascribed to Caravaggio in seventeenth-century documents, inventories, and in other sources. The catalogue of lost works describes a wide variety of material, including paintings considered copies of lost originals. Entries for untraced paintings include the city where they were identified in either a seventeenth-century source or inventory (“Inv.”). Most of the inventories have been published in the Getty Provenance Index, Los Angeles. Provenance, documents and sources, inventories and selective bibliographies are provided for the paintings by, after, and attributed to Caravaggio.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Department of Art History THE DOCUMENTED PAINTINGS AND LIFE OF ANDREA VACCARO (1604-1670) A Thesis in Art History by Anna Kiyomi Tuck-Scala Ó 2003 Anna Kiyomi Tuck-Scala Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2003 The thesis of Anna Kiyomi Tuck-Scala was reviewed and approved* by the following: Jeanne Chenault Porter Associate Professor of Art History Thesis Adviser Chair of Committee Roland E. Fleischer Professor Emeritus of Art History George L. Mauner Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Art History Alfred A. Triolo Associate Professor Emeritus of Italian and Spanish Craig Zabel Associate Professor of Art History Head of the Department of Art History *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT This dissertation takes stock of what is known about Andrea Vaccaro (1604- 1670), one of the most prominent painters of Naples in the middle of the seventeenth- century. Although successful during his lifetime, Vaccaro currently suffers a reputation that is, at best, second rate. Due to the hundreds of paintings attributed to Vaccaro of dubious quality, modern art historians characterize his art as “eclectic” and “academic.” The sole monograph on Vaccaro, Maria Commodo Izzo’s Andrea Vacccaro pittore (1604-1670) published in 1951, is also sorely out of date. This study provides a new and more accurate portrayal of the artist. Rather than the customary all-inclusive approach, this study is based on the solid foundation of all known documents about the artist’s life and art, which are gathered and analyzed in one place for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • SOMMARIO 01 Invito Alla Mostra 02 Comunicato Stampa 03 Scheda
    SOMMARIO 01 Invito alla mostra 02 Comunicato stampa 03 Scheda tecnica 04 Colophon 05 Biografie dei curatori 06 Scheda sala Joseph Beuys 07 La collezione di Capodimonte 08 Il Real Bosco 09 Elenco delle opere per sala 10 Selezione immagini per la stampa 11 Scheda App Carta Bianca 12 Scheda Amici di Capodimonte organizzazione in collaborazione con e comunicazione sponsor tecnici organizzazione in collaborazione con e comunicazione sponsor tecnici COMUNICATO STAMPA Carta Bianca Capodimonte Imaginaire da un’idea di Sylvain Bellenger e Andrea Viliani 12 dicembre 2017 – 17 giugno 2018 Museo e Real Bosco di Capodimonte via Miano 2, Napoli La mostra Carta Bianca - scrivono gli ideatori Sylvain Bellenger direttore del Museo e Real Bosco di Capodimonte e Andrea Viliani direttore del museo Madre di Napoli che hanno organizzato la mostra insieme alla casa editrice Electa - è stata immaginata come una celebrazione del museo contemporaneo, uno spazio e un tempo complesso, polisemico, polifonico dove si organizza la memoria e si narra la Storia. La Storia, lo sappiamo bene, è interpretazione permanente di molte storie singole, che riflettono il presente per provare ad agire sul futuro. Una semplificazione frequente consiste nel considerare un museo come una grande e omogenea lezione magistrale; ma appena ci si addentra nella sua materia, cioè si scopre l’impostazione delle sue collezioni, si capisce che la lezione magistrale è fatta di molteplici elaborazioni, dovute alla natura necessariamente incompleta della collezione, ai vincoli posti dalla progettazione architettonica, dalla conformazione e sequenza delle gallerie, dalla necessità di conservare materialmente le opere d’arte e i documenti, e a molte altre considerazioni che spesso sono incidentali.
    [Show full text]
  • Cap.1 Pittori Del Seicento Napoletano Dipinti Senza Autore Ed Autori
    Cap.1 Pittori del Seicento napoletano Dipinti senza autore ed autori senza dipinti Il ritardo, per motivi editoriali, nella pubblicazione del mio regesto sulla pittura napoletana del Seicento (2000 foto a colori riguardanti circa 150 artisti tra maggiori e minori) mi ha indotto ha cominciare a rendere noto a studiosi ed appassionati parte del mio lavoro e comincio con un capitolo originale dedicato a quei dipinti che, nonostante l’elevata qualità, attendono ancora dalla critica una giusta attribuzione, con la speranza nel contributo di quanti, napoletanisti o meno, vogliano collaborare in questa ricerca di paternità. La pittura napoletana seicentesca, il famoso secolo d’oro, è ricco di autori senza opere, per quanto siano stati reperiti i documenti di pagamento e di opere senza autore, come quelle che andremo ad esporre, avanzando quando possibile una nostra ipotesi attributiva. Cominciamo da un ritratto di Salvator Rosa nella veste di David (01), transitato in asta ed attribuito a Micco Spadaro senza convincere gli specialisti dell’artista, passiamo poi ad una tela raffigurante lo sbarco dell’infanta Maria d’Austria a Napoli , un episodio famoso ed un’opera di pregio per la quale non mi sento di avanzare alcuna ipotesi, quindi affrontiamo una scena di costume, un Bagno pubblico per uomini che potrebbe oscillare tra il Gargiulo ed il Rosa, quindi una Madonna delle Grazie (02) che mi sentirei, per analogie stilistiche e per collocazione in una sede dove il pittore ha avuto altre commissioni, di assegnare a Giuseppe Marullo, la Negazione di San Pietro (03), di recente avvicinata al catalogo di Ribera giovane, dovrebbe rimanere l’opera di un ignoto caravaggesco nordico attivo a Napoli intorno al 1620.
    [Show full text]
  • Muse2017v51p45-69.Pdf (2.490Mb)
    Andrea Vaccaro’s David and an Outline of Vaccaro’s Early Career* riccardo lattuada In 2014, at the suggestion of Ian Kennedy, Jeffrey Wilcox—then registrar of the Museum of Art and Archaeology at the University of Missouri, Columbia—sent me images of a powerful David with the Head of Goliath (Fig. 1 and back cover).1 I realized immediately that the artist of the painting was Andrea Vaccaro, a seventeenth-century Neapolitan painter, who lived from 1604 to 1670. In January 2015, I presented a lecture, titled Framing Andrea Vaccaro’s David.2 In this article I repeat some of the arguments I offered in my lecture, and I expand my views on Andrea Vaccaro’s early career, a difficult issue despite the recent interest of various scholars, including myself.3 The Columbia David Columbia’s David is marked by a strong chiaroscuro, and the brown preparation is applied on a thick canvas. These devices are an early seventeenth-century (Seicento) Neapolitan technique. The position of the hero’s torso recalls Caravaggio’s David in the Vienna Kunsthistorisches Museum (Fig. 2), but in fact the depiction of the hips and legs seems to derive from such classical models as the Meleager in the Musei Vaticani in Rome (Fig. 3), or the Pompey in the Palazzo Spada, Rome (Fig. 4).4 This is not surprising when we consider that both Rome and Naples hosted an untold amount of ancient sculpture and that, even in the early seventeenth century, artists, including the so-called Cara- vaggesque painters, based their study of the human body on observing ancient sculptures.
    [Show full text]
  • Bollettino D'arte, Anno I, Gennaio 1914, N
    © Ministero dei beni e delle attività culturali e del turismo – Bollettino d’Arte BOLLETTINO D’ARTE INDICE DEI SOMMARI DAL 1907 1907 Anno I SERIE I: ANNO I, 1907, SERIE I, FASC. I (GENNAIO) CORRADO RICCI: A S. E. Luigi Rava, Relazione sull’istituzione di un Bollettino mensile delle Belle Arti 1 (Roma, 1 ottobre 1906) LUIGI RAVA: Bollettino delle Belle Arti, circolare ai Direttori delle RR. Gallerie, dei RR. Musei e degli 2 Uffici regionali per la conservazione dei monumenti; Ai RR. Ispettori per i monumenti e scavi del Regno (Roma 2 ottobre 1906) GIULIO EMANUELE RIZZO: Il Discobolo di Castel Porziano 3 Il Cenacolo di Leonardo da Vinci – Relazione a S. E. il Ministro (La Commissione: Camillo Boito, 15 Luca Beltrami, Lodovico Pogliaghi, Luigi Gabba, Augusto Brusconi, Filippo Carcano, Oreste Murani, Gustavo Frizzoni, Alfredo D’Andrade, Gustavo Moretti, Corrado Ricci, relatore) J. B. SUPINO: Nel R. Museo Nazionale di Firenze 20 GINO FOGOLARI: RR. Gallerie di Venezia - Acquisto di un ritratto di Lorenzo Lotto 23 D.B. MARRAI: Scoperta di un affresco nel R. Istituto di Belle Arti di Firenze 25 Statue Robbiane nella Chiesa di S. Jacopo a Borgo a Mozzano (s.a.) 27 FEDERICO HERMANIN: Una collezione di stampe e disegni con vedute dell’antico Carnevale Romano 28 Nuovi locali del Gabinetto Nazionale delle Stampe (s.a.) 29 Notizie 30 Atti ufficiali 33 Commissioni 35 ANNO I, 1907, SERIE I, FASC. II (FEBBRAIO) GIACOMO BONI: Zona Monumentale 1 DIONIGI SCANO: Notizie di Arte Sarda 3 FEDERICO HERMANIN: Un volume di disegni di Pier Leone Ghezzi 17 CARLO GAMBA: Nuovi acquisti di dipinti veneti nella Galleria degli Uffizi 25 ANTONINO SALINAS: L’Annunziata d'Antonello da Messina lasciata al Museo Nazionale di Palermo 30 Notizie: Musei e Gallerie - Monumenti 32 Atti ufficiali 35 Commissioni 36 1 © Ministero dei beni e delle attività culturali e del turismo – Bollettino d’Arte ANNO I, 1907, SERIE I, FASC.
    [Show full text]
  • Caravaggio-Napoli Estratto.Pdf
    Sommario 18 Caravaggio a Napoli 2004-2019. Ragioni di una mostra Maria Cristina Terzaghi 20 Cultura e filosofia nella Napoli di Caravaggio Saverio Ricci 30 Caravaggio a Napoli: un percorso Maria Cristina Terzaghi 60 Caravaggio nella prima cappella del Pio Monte della Misericordia Loredana Gazzara 70 Dieci giorni a Napoli: Caravaggio “ben visto”, la squadra delle galee dei Cavalieri di Malta e il contesto napoletano del viaggio a Malta Keith Sciberras 80 Sulla prima ora del caravaggismo a Napoli Augusto Russo 92 Un teatro tutto terreno. Sul significato delle mostre caravaggesche a Napoli (1938-2004) Stefano Causa 3 10 Catalogo delle opere 228 Cronologia dei soggiorni napoletani di Caravaggio a cura di Loredana Gazzara e Maria Cristina Terzaghi 239 Bibliografia 19 Caravaggio a Napoli 2004-2019. Ragioni di una mostra Maria Cristina Terzaghi Se pensiamo che alcune tra le maggiori scoperte documentarie sugli anni napoletani di Cara- probabilmente al Merisi anche i ferri del mestiere, come dimostra il riuso di una tavola in prece- vaggio si scalano tra il 1977 e il 1984, quando Vincenzo Pacelli pubblicava le carte d’archivio su cui denza dipinta da un artista fiammingo, forse Finson nelDavid e Golia di Vienna (Terzaghi 2013). ancora oggi misuriamo la nostra conoscenza della Flagellazione, del Martirio di sant’Orsola, del- Quanto il rapporto con la società Finson & Vinck sia stato stringente per l’immissione delle ope- la perduta pala Radulovich, e in parte delle Sette opere di misericordia, si capisce che la ricostru- re caravaggesche nel mercato artistico cittadino e internazionale è storia recente (“Giuditta deca- zione della vicenda partenopea di Caravaggio è ben più giovane di quella romana.
    [Show full text]
  • Artists, Patrons, and Trust in Seventeenth-Century Naples: the Case of the Certosa Di San Martino
    Artists, Patrons, and Trust in Seventeenth-Century Naples: The Case of the Certosa di San Martino J. Nicholas Napoli Introduction In his 1739 essay on commerce, “Del Commercio del Regno di Napoli,” presented as a letter addressed to Don Francesco Ventura, the newly appointed President of the Magistrate of Commerce under Charles of Bourbon, Paolo Mattia Doria reflected on the city’s economic development during the period of Spanish viceregal rule and suggested possibilities for present- day and future reform. He argued that the regime fostered several practices in the civil life of the kingdom—including usurious rates of interest, the inconsistent registration and enforcement of loans and contracts, and the resultant lawsuits of hopeless complexity and interminable duration—that fed widespread distrust of commerce in the realm.1 For Doria, trust in each of these exchanges was critical in establishing and maintaining commerce, and ultimately rendered civil life possible.2 In Lezioni di economia civile, Doria defined trust as the reciprocal confidence of one citizen in another. In terms of commerce, it was the voluntary participation in economic exchange made possible by freedom and security of contracts.3 Doria developed his thinking about trust in the academic circles of late seventeenth- century Naples where the Accademia degli Investiganti and the Accademia Medina Coeli fostered intellectual exchange and allowed for the dissemination of the emerging philosophical trends in Europe.4 As a member of the Accademia Medina Coeli, Doria presented and listened to papers, or lezioni, alongside Giuseppe Valletta, Luc’Antonio Porzio, and younger members who would become the most prominent thinkers in the Neapolitan Enlightenment, including Niccolò 1 Paolo Mattia Doria, “Del Commercio del Regno di Napoli,” Il Pensiero Civile di Paolo Mattia Doria negli Scritti Inediti, 1739, edited by Enrico Vidal (Milan: A Giuffrè Editore, 1953), 178-79, 205.
    [Show full text]