The Elliniko Airport: Contested Politics and the Production of Urban Space in Athens, 1938-2014" (2014)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Elliniko Airport: Contested Politics and the Production of Urban Space in Athens, 1938-2014 University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations 5-1-2014 The lE liniko Airport: Contested Politics and the Production of Urban Space in Athens, 1938-2014 George Papakis University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/etd Part of the Geography Commons, History Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation Papakis, George, "The Elliniko Airport: Contested Politics and the Production of Urban Space in Athens, 1938-2014" (2014). Theses and Dissertations. 478. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/478 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ELLINIKO AIRPORT: CONTESTED POLITICS AND THE PRODUCTION OF URBAN SPACE IN ATHENS, 1938-2014 by George Papakis A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Urban Studies at The University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee May 2014 ABSTRACT THE ELLINIKO AIRPORT: CONTESTED POLITICS AND THE PRODUCTION OF URBAN SPACE IN ATHENS, 1938-2014 by George Papakis The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2014 Under the Supervision of Professor Joseph A. Rodriguez This study traces the historical forces that conditioned the dearth of public spaces in Athens, Greece, and through the case study of the city’s first civil airport, examines the current redevelopment plans of Athens’ largest remaining open space as part of a wider process of urban transformation. After serving the city for sixty years, the airport closed its doors in 2001, and since then the site has remained vacant. The government aims at attracting investments in upscale tourism and real estate, hoping to reposition this sector of the city as a thriving business center and entertainment destination. Yet, given the severe environmental and social problems of Athens, the implementation of an urban development agenda which promotes the further commercialization of urban space will make a livable city––so dependent on open public space––a more difficult and unlikely contingency. It is precisely this possibility that unites a diverse group of community actors that contest the government’s plans arguing instead for the creation of a metropolitan park, and presenting this site as a space of insurgent citizenship. The redevelopment process of the Elliniko airport is a central node in understanding the symbolic construction of Athens’ restructuring as a competitive city, while on the other hand, it figures as a paradigmatic case in the analysis of conflicts between economic development and sustainability. ii © Copyright by George Papakis, 2014 All Rights Reserved iii To my brother, Niko, for being a great mentor, and for always being proud of my smallest accomplishments. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter One Introduction 1 Chapter Two Early History of Athens and the Road to Elliniko, 1830-1939 36 Chapter Three The Transformation of Elliniko from a Flying Field to an Airport, 1940-1949 82 Chapter Four The Makeover of Athens and the Golden Period of Elliniko, 1950-1989 121 Chapter Five The Era of Mega-Projects and the Decommission of Elliniko, 1990-2004 168 Chapter Six Athens in Crisis and Elliniko at a Crossroads, 2005-2014 217 Chapter Seven Conclusion 275 References 295 v LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1 Refugee family outside their tent at Sourmena in 1925 56 Figure 2.2 House at the “Garden City” 58 Figure 2.3 Modernist house at Elliniko 58 Figure 2.4 What is left of the “garden city” 59 Figure 2.5 Antiquities at Elliniko 63 Figure 2.6 Crown Prince Pavlos at Hasani 64 Figure 2.7 Protest at the Royal Palace 74 Figure 2.8 Foundation-laying ceremony of Hasani airport 76 Figure 2.9 Aerial photograph of the airport in 1937 77 Figure 3.1 German IV. Gruppe pilots at Elliniko airport 85 Figure 3.2 Jerzy Iwanow 87 Figure 3.3 German pilots 88 Figure 3.4 The airport being bombed by the USAAF 94 Figure 3.5 Greek Prime Minister Georgios Papandreou at Elliniko 99 Figure 3.6 Winston Churchill in Athens 101 Figure 3.7 Field Marshal Bernard Montgomery at Hasani airport 103 Figure 3.8 TAE’s office in 1946 117 Figure 4.1 Elliniko in 1951 137 Figure 4.2 The airport’s terminal in the 1950s 139 Figure 4.3 A snapshot of the airport’s expansion in 1957 145 Figure 4.4 President Eisenhower’s arrival at Elliniko in 1959 148 Figure 4.5 President Eisenhower’s arrival at Elliniko in 1959 148 Figure 4.6 Eero Saarinen in Athens 149 Figure 4.7 Saarinen’s sketch of East Terminal 149 Figure 4.8 Saarinen’s model of East Terminal 150 Figure 5.1 Privatization proceeds by region 1990-2000 174 vi Figure 5.2 Wassenhoven’s “Thematic Parks” 185 Figure 5.3 Wassenhoven’s “Arts and literature” 185 Figure 5.4 Wassenhoven’s “Conference center and EXPO” 185 Figure 5.5 Wassenhoven’s “Aeronautics, telecommunication & 185 space technology” Figure 5.6 Proposal by Nancy Conger 191 Figure 5.7 Proposal by Ayman Zahreddine 191 Figure 5.8 Proposal by Gwang Ya Man 191 Figure 5.9 Proposal by Justine Lovinger 191 Figure 5.10 Proposal by Jeanie Yoon 192 Figure 5.11 Proposal by N. Stanos and A. Rodis 192 Figure 5.12 The marina of Agios Kosmas 200 Figure 5.13 The marina in relation to the airport 200 Figure 5.14 The Olympic venues inside Elliniko 204 Figure 5.15 Aerial view of Olympic venues at Elliniko 204 Figure 5.16 Aerial view of the DZO study 211 Figure 5.17 Areas of new construction 211 Figure 6.1 Privatizations in Greece 220 Figure 6.2 The impact of the financial rescue package on Elliniko 222 Figure 6.3 Demonstration against the privatization of Elliniko 224 Figure 6.4 The updated DZO master-plan 232 Figure 6.5 EU Commissioner Stavros Dimas 236 Figure 6.6 From a green park to casinos 243 Figure 6.7 The green washing of Elliniko 243 Figure 6.8 Elliniko and the Acropolis 244 Figure 6.9 General layout of the NTUA study 248 Figure 6.10 Serge Latouche at Elliniko 252 Figure 6.11 David Harvey and Mayor Kortzidis 253 Figure 6.12 Promotional logo for Elliniko 255 vii Figure 6.13 Pollalis’ land use plan for Elliniko 256 Figure 6.14 Digital representation of Pollalis’ plan 257 Figure 6.15 Josep Acebillo’s plan for Elliniko 263 Figure 6.16 Cartoon depicting Acebillo’s involvement in Elliniko 264 Figure 7.1 Cartoon illustrating the final sale of Elliniko 282 viii LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1 Survey on residents’ perceptions of their urban environment in EU capitals 10 Table 1.2 Greek newspapers, magazines, and other sources 28 Table 2.1 Refugee Population in Athens, 1928 55 Table 2.2 Population by settlement 65 Table 4.1 Athens’ population 1940-1991 128 Table 4.2 Airport traffic in five year intervals 136 Table 4.3 Population increases in municipalities around the airport 155 Table 5.1 Privatization of State-owned enterprises in Greece, 1992-2000 170 Table 6.1 Economic indicators 2004-2013 221 Table 7.1 Legislative elections since 2000 280 ix LIST OF MAPS Map 1.1 Elliniko, and the surrounding area 3 Map 2.1 Hasani, Trahones, and “Garden City” 61 Map 4.1 Security considerations for the location of the new airport 141 x ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my gratitude to my advisor, Professor Joe Rodriguez, for his constructive suggestions, and for providing me the freedom and encouragement to explore my research interests. I am also indebted to Professor Philip Shashko for his guidance and support in completing this dissertation. His close engagement with this study will never be forgotten. He has been a constant source of strength and intellectual stimulation during my studies. I am deeply grateful to Professor Rina Ghose for her help with the literature on neoliberalism and her constant moral support. I would also like to thank Professor Joel Rast for his comments and for initiating me into the fascinating field of urban politics. I would like to extend my warm thanks to Professor William Velez for his positive attitude and for having faith in me. I also thank my good friend Ben Lembrich for his thoughtful comments. Finally, my gratitude goes to my family for their unending love and sacrifices. xi 1 Chapter 1 Introduction This dissertation studies the privatization policies which underpin the urban development trajectories in Athens, examining the way forces operating at a variety of geographical scales intersect in the construction of new socioeconomic environments. More specifically, this qualitative case study will examine the history and the redevelopment of the former international airport of Athens at Elliniko. An analysis of the struggle over this site lends itself favorably to addressing the main thrust of this inquiry, which is to better understand how urban space is produced and transformed in contemporary Athens. Drawing upon in-depth interviews, content analysis, and archival research, I examine how the discussion of Elliniko’s redevelopment has been shaped by specific planning proposals, community activism, and national politics, as well as by the broader influences of geopolitics, paradigms of urban economic revival, and the mode of Greece’s integration in to the Atlantic structures. The case study is examined against the backdrop of political economy literature, which postulates that as cities attempt to become more competitive in the context of neoliberal globalization, they compromise public space, environmental conditions, and local democracy.
Recommended publications
  • Who Freed Athens? J
    Ancient Greek Democracy: Readings and Sources Edited by Eric W. Robinson Copyright © 2004 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd The Beginnings of the Athenian Democracv: Who Freed Athens? J Introduction Though the very earliest democracies lildy took shape elsewhere in Greece, Athens embraced it relatively early and would ultimately become the most famous and powerful democracy the ancient world ever hew. Democracy is usually thought to have taken hold among the Athenians with the constitutional reforms of Cleisthenes, ca. 508/7 BC. The tyrant Peisistratus and later his sons had ruled Athens for decades before they were overthrown; Cleisthenes, rallying the people to his cause, made sweeping changes. These included the creation of a representative council (bode)chosen from among the citizens, new public organizations that more closely tied citizens throughout Attica to the Athenian state, and the populist ostracism law that enabled citizens to exile danger- ous or undesirable politicians by vote. Beginning with these measures, and for the next two centuries or so with only the briefest of interruptions, democracy held sway at Athens. Such is the most common interpretation. But there is, in fact, much room for disagree- ment about when and how democracy came to Athens. Ancient authors sometimes refer to Solon, a lawgiver and mediator of the early sixth century, as the founder of the Athenian constitution. It was also a popular belief among the Athenians that two famous “tyrant-slayers,” Harmodius and Aristogeiton, inaugurated Athenian freedom by assas- sinating one of the sons of Peisistratus a few years before Cleisthenes’ reforms - though ancient writers take pains to point out that only the military intervention of Sparta truly ended the tyranny.
    [Show full text]
  • DONALD NICOL Donald Macgillivray Nicol 1923–2003
    DONALD NICOL Donald MacGillivray Nicol 1923–2003 DONALD MACGILLIVRAY NICOL was born in Portsmouth on 4 February 1923, the son of a Scottish Presbyterian minister. He was always proud of his MacGillivray antecedents (on his mother’s side) and of his family’s connection with Culloden, the site of the Jacobite defeat in 1745, on whose correct pronunciation he would always insist. Despite attending school first in Sheffield and then in London, he retained a slight Scottish accent throughout his life. By the time he left St Paul’s School, already an able classical scholar, it was 1941; the rest of his education would have to wait until after the war. Donald’s letters, which he carefully preserved and ordered with the instinct of an archivist, provide details of the war years.1 In 1942, at the age of nineteen, he was teaching elementary maths, Latin and French to the junior forms at St-Anne’s-on-Sea, Lancashire. He commented to his father that he would be dismissed were it known that he was a conscientious objector. By November of that year he had entered a Friends’ Ambulance 1 The bulk of his letters are to his father (1942–6) and to his future wife (1949–50). Also preserved are the letters of his supervisor, Sir Steven Runciman, over a forty-year period. Other papers are his diaries, for a short period of time in 1944, his notebooks with drawings and plans of churches he studied in Epiros, and his account of his travels on Mount Athos. This material is now in the King’s College London Archives, by courtesy of the Nicol family.
    [Show full text]
  • First Thoughts on the 25 January 2015 Election in Greece
    GPSG Pamphlet No 4 First thoughts on the 25 January 2015 election in Greece Edited by Roman Gerodimos Copy editing: Patty Dohle Roman Gerodimos Pamphlet design: Ana Alania Cover photo: The Zappeion Hall, by Panoramas on Flickr Inside photos: Jenny Tolou Eveline Konstantinidis – Ziegler Spyros Papaspyropoulos (Flickr) Ana Alania Roman Gerodimos Published with the support of the Politics & Media Research Group, Bournemouth University Selection and editorial matter © Roman Gerodimos for the Greek Politics Specialist Group 2015 All remaining articles © respective authors 2015 All photos used with permission or under a Creative Commons licence Published on 2 February 2015 by the Greek Politics Specialist Group (GPSG) www.gpsg.org.uk Editorial | Roman Gerodimos Continuing a tradition that started in 2012, a couple of weeks ago the Greek Politics Specialist Group (GPSG) invited short commentaries from its members, affiliates and the broader academ- ic community, as a first ‘rapid’ reaction to the election results. The scale of the response was humbling and posed an editorial dilemma, namely whether the pamphlet should be limited to a small number of indicative perspectives, perhaps favouring more established voices, or whether it should capture the full range of viewpoints. As two of the founding principles and core aims of the GPSG are to act as a forum for the free exchange of ideas and also to give voice to younger and emerging scholars, it was decided that all contributions that met our editorial standards of factual accuracy and timely
    [Show full text]
  • Download/Print the Study in PDF Format
    GENERAL ELECTION IN GREECE 7th July 2019 European New Democracy is the favourite in the Elections monitor Greek general election of 7th July Corinne Deloy On 26th May, just a few hours after the announcement of the results of the European, regional and local elections held in Greece, Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras (Coalition of the Radical Left, SYRIZA), whose party came second to the main opposition party, New Analysis Democracy (ND), declared: “I cannot ignore this result. It is for the people to decide and I am therefore going to request the organisation of an early general election”. Organisation of an early general election (3 months’ early) surprised some observers of Greek political life who thought that the head of government would call on compatriots to vote as late as possible to allow the country’s position to improve as much as possible. New Democracy won in the European elections with 33.12% of the vote, ahead of SYRIZA, with 23.76%. The Movement for Change (Kinima allagis, KINAL), the left-wing opposition party which includes the Panhellenic Socialist Movement (PASOK), the Social Democrats Movement (KIDISO), the River (To Potami) and the Democratic Left (DIMAR), collected 7.72% of the vote and the Greek Communist Party (KKE), 5.35%. Alexis Tsipras had made these elections a referendum Costas Bakoyannis (ND), the new mayor of Athens, on the action of his government. “We are not voting belongs to a political dynasty: he is the son of Dora for a new government, but it is clear that this vote is Bakoyannis, former Minister of Culture (1992-1993) not without consequence.
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution of Greece to the Victory of the Allies During Ww Ii
    CONTRIBUTION OF GREECE TO THE VICTORY OF THE ALLIES DURING WW II Lt Colonel of Engineering Panayiotis Spyropoulos Historian of the History Directorate of Hellenic Army General Staff The peninsula of Greece has, since antiquity, been a point of confrontation be- tween East and West, as it constitutes an area of utmost strategic value, situated on the flanks of the main axis of operations in East-West direction and vice-versa. Who- ever occupies Greece can effortlessly with his forces harass the flanks or even the rear of troops operating along the aforementioned axis, control the sea line of com- munication from Gibraltar to Suez, and block from the west the sea route from the Black Sea to Propontis (Marmara) Sea, the Hellespont (Straits), the Aegean Sea and the Mediterranean Sea. The geo-strategic value of Greece has been dramatically enhanced during the XXth century, due to the rapid technological development of war equipment (as per the quote of sir Halford Mackinder on the «Heartland»). During the 2nd World War, Italy launched the attack against Greece, without informing its ally, Germany. Berlin was enraged by the Italian action and considered it «totally incoherent» and mistimed, because it was initiated just before wintertime, a season unsuitable for mountain operations, as well as just before the elections in the (still neutral) USA, providing Roosevelt with even more convincing arguments for go- ing to war. Moreover, it criticised the Italians refraining from any seaborne operation, a fact that facilitated the British in debarking on Crete and other islands, significant for their strategic importance; while they left them the margin to deploy in Thessalo- nica.
    [Show full text]
  • Wrong Counts and Closing Doors the Reception of Refugees and Asylum
    Wrong counts and closing doors The reception of refugees and asylum seekers in Europe March 2016 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report was written by Minos Mouzourakis and Amanda Taylor of the European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE) as part of the Asylum Information Database (AIDA). The graphic design of this report was done by Azzam Daaboul at ECRE. The report includes contributions from: Austria Anny Knapp Asylkoordination Österreich Belgium Ruben Wissing Legal Consultant Bulgaria Iliana Savova Bulgarian Helsinki Committee Cyprus Corina Drousiotou and Manos Mathioudakis Future Worlds Center Spain Magdalena Queipo and Jennifer Zuppiroli ACCEM France Raphaël Morlat Forum Réfugiés-Cosi Germany Michael Kalkmann Informationsverbund Asyl und Migration Greece Vasiliki Tsipoura and Alexandros Konstantinou Greek Council for Refugees Croatia Lana Tučkorić Croatian Law Centre Hungary Gruša Matevžič Hungarian Helsinki Committee Ireland Maria Hennessy Irish Refugee Council Italy Caterina Bove ASGI Malta Neil Falzon and Claire Delom aditus foundation Netherlands Karina Franssen, Aya Younis and Merlijn Bothof Dutch Council for Refugees Poland Maja Łysienia Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights Sweden Michael Williams and Lisa Hallstedt FARR | Swedish Red Cross UK Judith Dennis British Refugee Council Switzerland Seraina Nufer Swiss Refugee Council Serbia Pavle Kilibarda and Nikola Kovačević Belgrade Centre for Human Rights Turkey Öykü Tümer and Oktay Durukan Refugee Rights Turkey The information contained in this report is up-to-date as of 12 March 2016. 2 THE ASYLUM INFORMATION DATABASE (AIDA) Asylum Information Database is a database containing information on asylum procedures, reception conditions and detention across 20 European countries. This includes 17 European Union (EU) Member States (Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Germany, Spain, France, Greece, Croatia, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Sweden, United Kingdom) and 3 non-EU countries (Switzerland, Serbia, Turkey).
    [Show full text]
  • Hamilakis Nation and Its Ruins.Pdf
    CLASSICAL PRESENCES General Editors Lorna Hardwick James I. Porter CLASSICAL PRESENCES The texts, ideas, images, and material culture of ancient Greece and Rome have always been crucial to attempts to appropriate the past in order to authenticate the present. They underlie the mapping of change and the assertion and challenging of values and identities, old and new. Classical Presences brings the latest scholarship to bear on the contexts, theory, and practice of such use, and abuse, of the classical past. The Nation and its Ruins: Antiquity, Archaeology, and National Imagination in Greece YANNIS HAMILAKIS 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford ox2 6dp Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With oYces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York ß Yannis Hamilakis 2007 The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2007 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization.
    [Show full text]
  • • International Court of Justice • • • • •
    • • • INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE • • • • • . Request for an • Advisory Opinion on the • Legal Consequences of the • Construction of a Wall • in the Occupied Palestinian Territories • • WRITTEN STATEMENT SUBMITTED BY • THE HASHEMITE KINGDOM OF JORDAN • • • • 30 January 2004 • • • • • TABLE OF CONTENTS • 1. Introduction • Il. General background • III. Immediate background • IV. Relevant facts V. Relevant legal considerations • (a) The Court' s jurisdiction • (i) The request raises a legal question which the Court has jurisdiction ta answer • (ii) There are no compelling reasons which should lead the • Court ta refuse ta give the advisory opinion requested of it. • (b) Applicable legal principles (i) The prohibition of the use of force, and the right of seIf- • determination, are Iules of ius cogens (ii) The territory in whîch the wall has been or is planned to be • constructed constitutes occupied territory for purposes of international law • (lii) The law applicable in respect of occupied territory limîts • the occupying State's power$ (iv) Occupied territory cannot be annexed by the occupying • State • (c) Applicable legal principles and the construction of the wall (i) The occupying State does not have the right effectively to • alIDex occupied territory or otherwise to alter its status (ii) The occupying State does not have the right to alter the • population balance in the occupîed territory by estabIishing alien • settlements • ->- :.• 1 1. • -11- (iii) The occupying State lS not entitled in occupied territory to construct a wall
    [Show full text]
  • Britain and the Greek Civil War, 1944–1949 British Imperialism, Public Opinion and the Coming of the Cold War
    Britain and the Greek Civil War, 1944–1949 British Imperialism, Public Opinion and the Coming of the Cold War JOHN SAKKAS Harrassowitz Verlag (Germany, 2013), 149 pp/28 illust. ISBN: 978-3-447-06718-8 The Greek civil war holds a significant place in the history of twentieth-century Europe for many reasons. Firstly, it was Europe’s bloodiest conflict in the second half of the 1940s; secondly, it marked a turning point in the Cold War; and lastly, it showed how Greece had become an ‘apple of discord’ for both American and Soviet involvement in Greek affairs which led to even more complexity in the country’s post-war politics. Yet despite its significance, only a limited number of studies have been carried out on the subject of this era. After the troubled period of the 1950s and 1960s, a time dominated by extreme conservatism, anti-communism and nationalist paroxysms, it was difficult to access material sources and this made it nearly impossible to conduct scholarly research, so that older politically-charged interpretations and accounts went mostly unchallenged. However, in the past two decades a new historiographical current has developed as regards the civil war in Greece and new evaluations and debates have emerged that shed fresh light on conventional supposition. Britain and the Greek Civil War, 1944–1949 draws upon the author’s doctoral dissertation and provides a welcome addition to studies on that period in Greek history. John Sakkas takes up a novel approach that does not focus solely on Greek politics, whether they are national or local, nor does it centre simply on British policy in Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil-Military Relations: a Comparative Analysis of the Role of the Military in the Political Transformation of Post-War Turkey and Greece: 1980-1995
    CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE ROLE OF THE MILITARY IN THE POLITICAL TRANSFORMATION OF POST-WAR TURKEY AND GREECE: 1980-1995 Dr. Gerassimos Karabelias Final Report submitted to North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in June 1998 1 ABSTRACT This report attempts to determine the evolution of civil-military relations in Turkey and Greece during the 1980-1995 period through an examination of the role of the military in the political transformation of both countries. Since the mid-1970s and especially after the Fall of the Berlin Wall, the struggle for spreading the winds of democracy around the globe has been the goal of all western states and particularly the United States of America. However, taking into consideration the volatility in the Balkans and in Central Asia, the military institution of Turkey and Greece which gave the impression that it withdrew in the barracks after their last intervention in 1980-83 and 1967-74 respectively, could easily be forced or even tempted to assume a greater responsibility in the conduct of each country’s domestic and foreign affairs. Only through a better understanding of its role during the 1980-95 period, we would be able to determine the feasibility of such scenarios. Using a multi-factorial model as a protection from the short- sighted results which the majority of mono-factorial approaches produce, this report starts with the analysis of the distinct role which the Armed Forces of each country have had in the historical evolution of their respective civil-military relations up to 1980 (Part One of Chapters Two and Three).
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of SYRIZA
    Encyclopedia of Anti-Revisionism On-Line Panos Petrou The making of SYRIZA Published: June 11, 2012. http://socialistworker.org/print/2012/06/11/the-making-of-syriza Transcription, Editing and Markup: Sam Richards and Paul Saba Copyright: This work is in the Public Domain under the Creative Commons Common Deed. You can freely copy, distribute and display this work; as well as make derivative and commercial works. Please credit the Encyclopedia of Anti-Revisionism On-Line as your source, include the url to this work, and note any of the transcribers, editors & proofreaders above. June 11, 2012 -- Socialist Worker (USA) -- Greece's Coalition of the Radical Left, SYRIZA, has a chance of winning parliamentary elections in Greece on June 17, which would give it an opportunity to form a government of the left that would reject the drastic austerity measures imposed on Greece as a condition of the European Union's bailout of the country's financial elite. SYRIZA rose from small-party status to a second-place finish in elections on May 6, 2012, finishing ahead of the PASOK party, which has ruled Greece for most of the past four decades, and close behind the main conservative party New Democracy. When none of the three top finishers were able to form a government with a majority in parliament, a date for a new election was set -- and SYRIZA has been neck-and-neck with New Democracy ever since. Where did SYRIZA, an alliance of numerous left-wing organisations and unaffiliated individuals, come from? Panos Petrou, a leading member of Internationalist Workers Left (DEA, by its initials in Greek), a revolutionary socialist organisation that co-founded SYRIZA in 2004, explains how the coalition rose to the prominence it has today.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Summary Report
    2019 SUMMARY REPORT athensdemocracyforum.com Global Conversation: Reinventing Democracy SESSION BRIEFINGS athensdemocracyforum.com 2 WELCOME REMARKS Achilles Tsaltas, President, Athens Democracy Forum Achilles Tsaltas welcomed delegates and esteemed guests to the seventh edition of the Athens Democracy Forum, introducing the five challenges of populism, new communication technologies, enormous gaps in personal wealth, the shifting terrain of the political-party system, and a sense of alienation and loss among many people, that represent the key themes for this year’s program. Reiterating the importance of preserving democracy as the only viable form of social organization, he outlined democracy as a constant process of reinvention and revival. Mr. Tsaltas warned that many of today’s democracies are so polarized, that they seem paralyzed. While optimists view the current threats to democracy as a natural process of decay and revival, he said, the pessimists are likely to consider the potential for decline into chaos and tyranny. He declared that this year’s conference brings together a sampling of both optimists and pessimists among participants, stating that through their debates and presentations, delegates will be able to glean a better understanding of where democracy might be headed. Mr. Tsaltas explained that the Athens Democracy Forum is becoming a nerve center for democratic debate, and described the new structure of the event, now hosted by the Democracy & Culture Foundation, a nonprofit entity, in association with The New York Times. Mr. Tsaltas thanked all conference partners and sponsors for their commitment. athensdemocracyforum.com 3 Annika Savill, Executive Head, UN Democracy Fund, United Nations Annika Savill underlined the task in front of delegates at this year’s event, highlighting the inspiration they might derive from the City of Athens itself, as the cradle of democracy.
    [Show full text]