Beijing Harbin Lanzhou Jinan Wuhan Ningbo Guangzhou Kunming Shanghai Shenyang Xi’an Qingdao Wuxi Fuzhou Shenzhen Guiyang Tianjin Dalian Taiyuan Zhengzhou Suzhou Xiamen Zhuhai Chongqing Urumqi Shijiazhuang Nanjing Hangzhou Changsha Chengdu
Chinese Cities of Opportunity 2018 Cities: Creating a beautiful life and new opportunities
In modern society, cities are the most Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan Region, offers a comprehensive evaluation of the important spaces in which people can the Guanzhong Plain urban cluster, competitiveness, influence and potential pursue a better life. China has the Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Zone, of urban development to provide largest urban population in the world. In the central-southern of Liaoning and benchmarks for overall urban 2017, over 58% of China’s population, or Harbin-Changchun urban cluster. development, and has come to exert an more than 800 million people, lived in People gravitate toward areas with extensive influence in China. On the cities, and the urbanisation rate for economic opportunities and high quality basis of Chinese Cities of Opportunity residents is increasing by over one public services. Therefore, enhancing 2017, the number of sample cities percentage point every year. The the inclusiveness, balance and observed this year has increased to 30, advancement of urbanisation has sustainability of the development of and special attention has been given to pushed forward the intensive and urban clusters with large cities is a the development of national strategic efficient use of resources, promoted significant undertaking at the core of regions such as Guangdong-Hong innovation and enabled the economy to resolving “the principal contradiction Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area and prosper, while providing better basic between unbalanced and inadequate Xiong’an New Area. Most of the 30 cities public services. Taken together, these development and the people’s ever- are central cities of the aforementioned features have laid the foundations of a growing needs for a better life” urban clusters. Through exploring urban better life for residents. proposed in the 19th CPC National characteristics and advantages, we are Congress. striving to set up an innovative approach Large cities and the urban clusters for urban social governance to build a centred on them have been playing a The Chinese Cities of Opportunity report, harmonious and beautiful China. greater role in providing opportunities jointly released by the China for people in changing their life chances, Development Research Foundation and The team of the China Development which justifies the designation: “Cities of PwC for five consecutive years, focuses Research Foundation participated in the Opportunity”. According to a recent on the industrial development, discussions at every stage of this report. study by the China Development innovation potential, coordinated The team regards it as an important Research Foundation, the proportion of regional development and the synergetic learning opportunity, while aiming to GDP of 12 urban clusters accounted for development of people’s life and add contributions and benefits. I would 71.34% of China’s total GDP in 2006 and ecological protection in China’s key like to take this opportunity to express increased to 82.03% in 2015. This cities. It is also the Chinese version of my appreciation and admiration to PwC reflects the trend of economic PwC’s Cities of Opportunity report on for actively taking on this socially opportunities gathering in large cities global urban development. Using the responsible undertaking, and dedicating and urban clusters. The 12 urban perspectives and analytical framework intelligence to China’s development, clusters reviewed cover the Yangtze of the global edition, and combined with along with my gratitude to PwC and the River Delta, Pearl River Delta, Beijing- the realities of China, the Chinese team for all their efforts. I hope we can Tianjin-Hebei Region, Western Taiwan version has built an indicator system of continue to deepen our partnership in Straits Economic Zone, Shandong the state of China’s development with the future, and jointly deliver valuable Peninsula, Central China, Wuhan, Chinese characteristics. The system intellectual products to society.
Lu Mai Vice Chairman and Secretary General China Development Research Foundation China’s innovation- driven development will boost the global economy
Welcome to the latest edition of PwC’s A city is a window into a country, and We appreciate the trust and support that Chinese Cities of Opportunity. Now an our findings relating to development of the China Development Research established fixture, this report is urban centres have shed light on the Foundation has given PwC over the last developed for the 5th year in tandem remarkable progress achieved across the five years. Such support enables our with PwC’s global annual assessment of nation since the initial implementation ongoing efforts in urban development urban development to provide an of the reform and opening up policy research in China, which underpins this evaluation of updates in influential cities began. Now, China’s cities are marching report. We look forward to continuing across China. confidently forward toward market- our study in this subject, while exploring oriented development, benefiting from and contributing to China’s ongoing In October, the 19th National Congress myriad innovations in institutions and drive in urbanisation. of the Communist Party of China set out industries. Of note, the establishment of the blueprints for future national Xiong'an New Area in 2017, represents a development. Due to China’s role in bold exploration of a fresh mechanism global economic and political progress, for coordinated regional urban the impacts following from the national development driven by innovation. development plans will have greater Xiong'an New Area is tasked with reach than ever before. A range of new driving the green development of the strategies and policies rolled out at the whole region, and reflects China’s National Congress will shape China’s efforts in this mode of urban approach to challenging major issues, development. At the 19th Party offer pathways for common Congress, President Xi Jinping proposed development that transcend national the building of a smart society in his boundaries, and critically, put forward report. Accelerating the construction of new goals for boosting urban smart cities along with the coordinated development in China, with effects that development of new urbanisation look could reverberate around the world. like two particularly crucial steps in pursuing this goal. An essential feature of PwC’s Chinese Cities of Opportunity report is the identification of areas of new growth potential in Chinese cities, which provides reference points for the building of a smart society.
Robert E. Moritz Global Chairman PwC Contents
Overview...... 2
Selection of cities...... 2
Assessment approach...... 3
Scoring method...... 3
Data sources...... 3
Observation results...... 4
In-depth interviews ...... 4 Comparison and analysis of Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen...... 5
(Interview) Connie Wong Wai-ching: Studying the spirit of the 19th CPC National Congress and integrating urban development strategy into business operation...... 7
Comparison and analysis of ranking ...... 9
I. Intellectual capital and innovation...... 11
(Interview) Liu Hongxia: Complementarity between a research university and an intellectual-innovative city...... 13
II. Technical maturity...... 15
III. Major regional cities...... 17
(Interview) Wang Jianye: Cross-border flow of factors of production and governance modernisation...... 19 IV. Health, safety and public security...... 21
V. Transportation and urban planning...... 23
VI. Sustainable development and natural environment...... 25
(Interview) Bai Jiangong: Innovation poses a substantial challenge to corporate management...... 27
VII. Culture and quality of life...... 29
VIII. Economic clout...... 31
IX. Cost...... 33
(Interview) Zhang Yueguo: Deepening cooperation between Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macau to build a world-class bay area...... 35
(Interview) Zhou Ping: The Belt and Road Initiative and the construction of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area...... 36
X. Ease of doing business...... 37
Variables...... 39
Acknowledgements...... 44
For further information...... 45 1 PwC Cities have long been the epitome of economic development and social Overview advancement. A wide assortment of elements of a city hold opportunities for urban growth, including historical traditions, natural environment, industrial features and cultural resources, as well those that lie in the bigger picture amid reform and development. While keeping track of major cities around the world, PwC has been cooperating with the China Development Research Foundation since 2014, to select cities in China as samples for further comprehensive comparison and study. This year is the fifth year we publish Chinese Cities of Opportunity.
Selection of cities The preceding four reports had varied ranking-based comparison method that sample sizes, with 15, 20, 24 and 28 had been used in our prior reports to cities included for 2014, 2015, 2016 and compare all the cities together is less 2017, respectively. This trend points to appropriate this year. Therefore, this an increasing range that has broadened report differs from previous editions in annually. Also, these prior reports didn’t that the four cities of Beijing, Shanghai, include Beijing and Shanghai. This is Guangzhou and Shenzhen are studied because Beijing, Shanghai and Hong separately, while the other 26 cities are Kong have been studied by PwC from a ranked in sequence. Therefore, this global perspective. Given this, the global year, Chinese Cities of Opportunity 2018 observations on Beijing and Shanghai provides two observation results. One over the four consecutive years had been involves comparison between Beijing, listed in the Appendix of our reports. Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen. The other is a comparison of the 26 This year, we have introduced changes. remaining cities. These cities are Chinese Cities of Opportunity 2018 Harbin, Shenyang, Dalian, Urumqi, features observations on 30 cities Lanzhou, Xi’an, Taiyuan, Tianjin, including Beijing and Shanghai, as well Shijiazhuang, Jinan, Qingdao, as all cities reviewed in 2017. Given the Zhengzhou, Nanjing, Wuhan, Wuxi, huge size of the two new entrants, as Suzhou, Hangzhou, Ningbo, Fuzhou, well as the reality and actual influence Xiamen, Changsha, Zhuhai, Chengdu, of Guangzhou and Shenzhen, the Chongqing, Kunming and Guiyang.
Suzhou Photo by Ryan Yang (PwC)
Chinese Cities of Opportunity 2018 2 Assessment approach Scoring method government departments, statistical yearbooks and statistical bulletins of PwC’s assessment tools for urban The “score by rank” principle is used to every city, as well as survey findings of surveys are used in this report. The order results. In terms of the 26 authoritative think tanks, universities methods are similar to those typically aforementioned cities, a value and research institutions. The data are adopted for comparative study of cities, corresponding to each city is obtained sorted without being weighted. in that variables at several levels are under the same variable in a given employed to collect an extensive range dimension. Then, all values of different In determining observation variables, of data. However, this report uses more cities for this dimension are ranked from we give priority to statistical data and dimensions than in ordinary surveys, in the largest to the smallest. Subsequently, avoid questionnaire data, so that the an effort to provide a more detailed the city with the highest rank is given a data selected can reflect the observation picture of the cities involved. In total, 10 score of 26 points, the city with the angles in the most objective way. In dimensions are used and altogether 57 second highest rank is given a score of instances where single sources of data variables are employed, with a range of 25 points, and so on (where the score is don’t fully reflect the observation angle, four to seven variables in each opposite to its ranking); in the case of we turn to parameters with the same dimension. These dimensions indicate cities with the same ranking, the influencing factors to gather composite observation angles but are not weighted. corresponding score is the same. There data, in an effort to compile data that All variables are viewed equally, and are exceptions however, where the faithfully reflect the observation angle they form a subdivision of the ranking of a city is opposite to the score. as much as possible. observation angles. The number of This is the case for variables such as The majority of data has been collected variables in each dimension reflects the costs and resource consumption, where from the end of 2016, with some in 2017, difficulty in access of statistical data, a city with the lowest numeric value when a reliable source was available. In and, to some extent, the importance we takes the highest position and score, and instances where cities did not disclose attached to that dimension. so on. The ranking-based scoring sufficient data, data at the provincial method offers a simplification of the Given the limited data sources, the level has been used. These instances are otherwise complicated differences design angles of the variables of Chinese presented in the Appendix of the report. among cities that are separated by a Cities of Opportunity 2018 are slightly point. The sum total of scores for a city different from the previous edition, Observation results under the different variables in a given though the basic principles remain dimension is equal to the total score the The observation results for Beijing, unchanged. All design angles and data city is allocated in that dimension. The Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen sources of the variables can be found in final rank of all cities is determined by have Beijing at the top of the list, the “Variables” section of the report. comparing the sum of all the total scores followed by Shanghai and Shenzhen, In reality, social life is rich and of each city for every dimension. while Guangzhou is ranked last. We colourful. Cities differ, and the varied should point out that in the preceding The scores for Beijing, Shanghai, landscapes, historical changes, cultural four reports of Chinese Cities of Guangzhou and Shenzhen are also traditions and industrial layouts present Opportunity, Shenzhen ranked above determined by the same method. us with complex and fluctuating Guangzhou in the first and second phenomena. PwC’s assessment tools editions, and below Guangzhou in the seek to capture as many observation Data sources third and fourth issues, and now perspectives on the variety of aspects With regard to data selection, PwC outperforms Guangzhou again in this and diversity of actual life as possible. A assessment tools are distinguished for report. Please refer to the analysis for summary of the data from a range of their attention to the data’s objectivity, scores in specific dimensions. aspects ensures that comparison of cities comparability and feasibility. Sources of The results of the 26 other cities see gets as close to our visual impression as data are publically available, and Hangzhou ranked first, followed by possible. predominantly come from the National Wuhan, Nanjing, Chengdu, Xiamen, Bureau of Statistics, statistical results of Xi’an and Tianjin. These rankings are
3 PwC the same as the previous year. The dimensions defined in the report. The corporate operations, Mr. Bai has subsequent cities are Changsha, Suzhou, Chinese Cities of Opportunity, is not stimulated corporate growth and Zhengzhou, Zhuhai, Qingdao, Jinan, conducted for profit. Views of each established a national-level incubator Kunming, Chongqing and Ningbo. participant are entirely their own, and park. Mr. Bai applies his experience here Notably, Changsha is two places higher they have been shared freely to to share perspectives on innovation. than the previous year, and Qingdao contribute to a better understanding of Mr. Zhang Yueguo serves as surpassed Jinan, but Chongqing urban development. This year, Chinese President as well as Secretary of the dropped three positions. The bottom 10 Cities of Opportunity is privileged to Leading Party Members’ Group of the cities in sequence are Wuxi, Fuzhou, include perspectives from the following Guangzhou Academy of Social Sciences. Guiyang, Dalian, Taiyuan, Shenyang, distinguished professionals. His contribution pertains to Urumqi, Shijiazhuang, Harbin and Ms. Connie Wong Wai-ching, a development of the Guangdong-Hong Lanzhou. Compared to the previous businesswoman from Hong Kong, with Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area. Due to year, Wuxi’s position has risen, while years of experience in investment in the fact that implementation of this Shenyang’s position has declined. There mainland China and Hong Kong. Ms. strategy will exert a great influence on is no major change in ranking among Wang is also actively involved in social the economy, environment, culture and the best and worst cities, though there services, holding public office both in social life in the area, a special interview have been slight variations in the middle mainland China and Hong Kong. Ms. concerning the greater bay area was of the rankings. More minute changes Wang’s contribution in this report arranged, despite lack of such a are observable with the variables in the considers the influence of national and dimension in this year’s report. dimension and further observations are regional urban development strategies presented in the analysis of each Dr. Zhou Ping, from Macau, launched on enterprises from the perspective of dimension. and led a forward-looking and business operation. pragmatic social survey called “Survey Due to the limited space, we are unable Ms. Liu Hongxia from New York of 100 Villages by 100 Doctors”. Dr. to give a detailed analysis on all aspects University Shanghai(NYU Shanghai), Zhou’s contribution to this report of every city, but the report is rich with looks at the topic of education. With her considers regional cooperation and data. Interested readers may conduct world-class educational experience and development from the perspective of the more in-depth analysis based on the 10 a global view, Ms. Liu provides a vivid Belt and Road Initiative and Trade and dimensions and 57 variables perspective of how to build up urban Economic Platform between China and summarised in the report, to focus on intellectual capital. Portuguese-speaking countries. the natural resources, development strategy, industrial layout, historical Dr. Wang Jianye previously held a Each of the interviewees has generously tradition and the success and failure of senior position at the IMF, and served as contributed their knowledge and management practice of specific cities, the Chief Economist at the Export- experience to this report, adding with a view to exploring the Import Bank of China. Today, Dr. Wang nuanced perspective to inform readers’ opportunities that fit with the is an influential figure in business and current understanding of urban development focus of cities. economic academia in China and the development in China. US. His contribution is set against the In-depth interviews backdrop of reform and further opening-up of China’s financial sector In addition to the compilation and this year. analysis of quantitative data, each year, a selection of entrepreneurs, scholars Mr. Bai Jiangong is an entrepreneur and social elites are invited to from mainland China. Having seen ups participate in an interview to share their and downs along Shenzhen’s views and insights. Each interview is development, Mr. Bai has been engaged focused on a topic related to urban in pursuing product and management development, not limited to the innovation. In his capacity with
Chinese Cities of Opportunity 2018 4 Comparison and analysis of Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen
Intellectual capital Technical maturity Major regional Health, safety Transportation and Sustainable Culture and quality Economic clout Cost Ease of doing Score and innovation cities and public urban planning development and of life business security natural environment 1 Beijing 19 17 16 17 24 6 9 21 14 19 162 2 Shanghai 13 12 21 12 18 11 10 19 16 24 156 3 Shenzhen 15 13 11 14 24 19 11 9 16 20 152 4 Guangzhou 13 8 18 13 22 14 10 11 14 14 137 Note: the design of variables and data collection angles for Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen are identical with those of the remaining 26 cities. Due to limited space, only the Dimension Sheet is listed here.
Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen, known as “Bei, Shang, Guang, Shen” for short, are normally classified as first-tier cities. In light of their capacities as agglomerations with economic clout, large population and influence on the global market, the four are all readily identified as cities at an international level. Globally, a megacity is typically a symbol of the country it’s located in, and this is especially true for a great power. In China at this current stage, Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen can each be considered windows into China, and representative of the national profile to a fair extent. According to our data, among the four cities, Beijing and Shanghai rank first and second, followed closely by Shenzhen and then Guangzhou. When it comes to the scores of the dimensions, Beijing heads the list in five dimensions; “intellectual capital and innovation”, “technical maturity”, “health, safety and public security”, “transportation and urban planning” and “economic clout”. Shanghai holds the second place with high scores in “major regional cities” and “ease of doing business”. Shenzhen ranks third and stands side by side with Beijing with regard to “transportation and urban planning”, while topping “sustainable development and natural environment” and “ease of doing business”. Guangzhou exceeds Shenzhen in the dimensions of “major
5 PwC Shenzhen Photo by Susanna Zhang (PwC) Intellectual capital Technical maturity Major regional Health, safety Transportation and Sustainable Culture and quality Economic clout Cost Ease of doing Score and innovation cities and public urban planning development and of life business security natural environment 1 Beijing 19 17 16 17 24 6 9 21 14 19 162 2 Shanghai 13 12 21 12 18 11 10 19 16 24 156 3 Shenzhen 15 13 11 14 24 19 11 9 16 20 152 4 Guangzhou 13 8 18 13 22 14 10 11 14 14 137
regional cities” and “economic clout”, inherent urban characteristics. Beijing implications for the economic growth but occupies the fourth place due to a functions as the political, cultural, and social advancement of China. lower overall score, with comparatively international exchange and scientific Regarding the potential of these shifts, low-ranks in other dimensions. innovation centre, Shanghai serves as we can consider the Xiong’an New Area, China’s largest business and financial Upon PwC’s observation of 30 global in Hebei. This new initiative led by the hub, while Guangzhou established itself cities made in 2016, Beijing came 19th Central Committee of the Communist as a pioneer of reform and opening up in in the overall ranking, though placed Party of China, has the potential to exert China. These three cities have a long 3rd after London and Paris in the far-reaching significance. The seemingly and established history. Shenzhen, a dimension of “gateway city” and also plain and simple words “affairs of 40-year-old city, is a more modern secured the 3rd spot, trailing London national significance” can spark endless construct, yet has quickly managed to and New York, in the “economic clout” imagination of the possibilities for rise to a level on par with the other dimension. Shanghai came 21st in the people in the flat farmlands on the three, despite not sharing a legacy overall ranking, taking the 7th place in North China Plain, particularly if they stretching over millennia. Nevertheless, the two aforementioned dimensions. compare Shenzhen today, with what it Shenzhen has become an illuminating Factors contributing to Beijing and looked like as a small fishing village 40 window into China for the world. This is Shanghai placing lower on the overall years ago. an indication of the scope of China’s global list can be in large part attributed achievements since embarking on The development strategy of the three to their poor performance in the reform and opening up, as well as major regions applies a focus on growth international comparison of the costs evidence of the advantages brought that is specific to each of the cities. dimension, with the two cities taking about by a socialist market economy Hence, the 19th CPC National Congress the lowest, and second lowest positions with Chinese characteristics. report specifies that: “we will create respectively. networks of cities and towns based on An accurate study of China’s top four Based on observations from prior city clusters, enabling the coordinated cities requires a view transcending the reports, Guangzhou has long been development of cities of different sizes traditional limits of these cities. Beijing ranked comparably with Shenzhen. and small towns”, reflecting a new lies at the core of the Beijing-Tianjin- Shenzhen topped the list of domestic situation in development of city clusters Hebei area, Shanghai takes the lead in cities in 2014 and 2015, while with urban and rural integration. the Yangtze River Economic Belt, while Guangzhou came in first in 2016 and both Guangzhou and Shenzhen will be 2017. However, both were given the essential components of the Guangdong- lowest ranking in the costs dimension. Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area. Consequently, we can observe soaring Following roll out by the State Council, costs have become a common feature in the construction of these three major city China’s megacities. clusters has been upgraded to a national We can also note that each of these four development strategy. As a result, these cities feature their own distinct and developments carry strategic
Chinese Cities of Opportunity 2018 6 People in Hong Kong haven’t always counted among those paying the most Studying the attention to the Party Congresses, however, I personally, was deeply impressed by the report to the 19th CPC spirit of the 19th National Congress. Having participated in several learning programs organised CPC National by the Liaison Office of the Central People’s Government in the Hong Kong Congress and S.A.R, I now have a clear understanding of the significance the Congress has on the future development of mainland integrating urban China and Hong Kong. Still, many in Hong Kong may not yet appreciate the development degree to which they are influenced by the Party Congress. Some corporate strategy into executives may show slight interest, but also believe business development is separated from the political context. business However, it is my observation that the two are closely intertwined. When operation looking at investing in the United States, prudent investors will thoroughly explore the political and policy environment there before acting. Similarly, we must keep abreast of the fundamental national policies in mainland China when investing and operating in the country, lest we make unnecessary detours. The report to the 19th CPC National Congress includes specific contents Connie Wong Wai-ching while covering an extensive range. It Member of the National Committee of the CPPCC makes clear our direction for Managing Director of Wong Sun Hing Limited development in the coming five years, Managing Director of Wanling Industrial Co., Ltd. and over the next decade. A clear development objective is proposed: China will achieve modernised development by 2035 and grow into a strong power by 2050. The development focus has been shifted from speed to quality. In terms of assessment for officials, rather than using measures of
7 PwC GDP growth alone, environmental We entrepreneurs must harbour a development of the city, however, I protection effect and energy long-term vision while being sensible to predicted that non-city functions would consumption per unit of output are also changes in the environment. When eventually be transferred. As a result, in taken into consideration. taking charge of the preparation for the recent years we have been improving One Link Plaza integrated project, I was the functions for further transformation There are precedents to learn from. told that costs of fire-fighting equipment and upgrading. By doing so, we have Some years ago, leaders of could be saved by exploiting loopholes been able to keep up with the changes in Guangdong-a provincial pioneer for of laws and following an older fire- the environment at Yuexiu District, reform and opening up-put forward the fighting plan. But, I believed that the plan which is now planned to become a policy known as “emptying the cage for would become stricter as the urban finance and innovation centre. the new birds”. This policy approach environment changed. Therefore, I asked contributed to industrial upgrading and In November last year, I also held a our engineering team to install technological innovations, leading to sharing session on the principles of the equipment in accordance with the latest progress in the development of the 19th CPC National Congress with our high standards. Now, some years later, high-tech park of Shenzhen and group’s management members. the fire-fighting equipment is due for a transformation of Dongguan. This case Hopefully, they can move beyond their new round of approvals to meet serves as a reminder that higher quality older concepts and put in place new requirements for upgrading and and output can lead to the level of requirements as well as objectives that transformation of a commercial building. prosperity desired across China. align with this new era. For us, the As a result of my initial far-sighted “green hills and clear waters” specified Through the report to the 19th CPC decision, there has been no need to add at the 19th CPC National Congress National Congress, President Xi brought more time and money into this. During requires us to enhance our forward 14 basic strategies for the new my time working on business operations, environmental standards. We must head era, the last of which is to officials from administrative for this new objective. comprehensively strengthen party departments have sometimes reminded discipline. This will, among other me that our issues might be solved by I have been asked what impressed me things, lay the foundation for the seeking more personal connections. Yet, most about the report. For me, it is the development of a market-based from my perspective, this cannot serve continuous implementation of stricter economy. In the fledgling years of as our sole focus. We must exercise party discipline since the 18th CPC reform and opening-up, corporate law-based and compliant operations, National Congress! Given the vast investment was sometimes facilitated by while meeting the requirements of urban territory of our nation, loose governance personal connections alone instead of a development. For the existing problems, here and there is doomed to fail. This is contractual spirit; however, this is no we do our utmost best to address them. also true for us. We are called on to longer the case. The country has grown Only by doing so can we stabilise and manage our enterprises strictly, and to into a nation ruled by law; the develop our enterprises for the long haul. value new concepts and objectives so government and society cherish the that we can keep up in this new era. For those of us in business, our contractual spirit, and enterprises can operation is dependent on urban implement reasonable contents of development and it’s crucial for contracts without seeking personal entrepreneurs to figure out the connections here and there. Such a positioning of the cities where our sound situation benefits from businesses are based. As an example, a strengthened party governance. wholesale market that we operated in Personally, I’m glad to see that our Yuexiu District has been a local leading country has demonstrated itself capable enterprise for many years. With the of fully exercising law-based governance.
Suzhou Photo by Ryan Yang (PwC)
Chinese Cities of Opportunity 2018 8 Comparison and analysis of ranking
Intellectual capital Technical maturity Major regional Health, safety Transportation and Sustainable Culture and quality Economic clout Cost Ease of doing Score and innovation cities and public urban planning development and of life business security natural environment 1 Hangzhou 134 117 116 93 121 96 72 138 25 131 1043 2 Wuhan 121 117 110 81 111 80 73 114 77 124 1008 3 Nanjing 135 113 116 63 133 71 76 96 50 140 993 4 Chengdu 127 104 131 93 98 80 53 115 72 90 963 5 Xiamen 100 68 115 58 113 94 76 108 68 126 926 6 Xi'an 99 100 106 91 110 50 51 96 84 90 877 7 Tianjin 101 95 99 59 107 66 58 116 66 99 866 8 Changsha 104 69 91 79 97 96 76 99 56 97 864 9 Suzhou 101 110 74 49 82 74 63 74 83 142 852 10 Zhengzhou 75 58 78 79 108 80 34 77 94 114 797 11 Zhuhai 84 47 43 80 147 85 87 74 30 117 794 12 Qingdao 86 87 95 75 88 69 50 82 56 93 781 13 Jinan 69 70 88 78 85 76 33 90 66 93 748 14 Kunming 71 46 98 66 108 70 31 64 121 71 746 15 Chongqing 60 81 142 60 51 62 28 99 74 81 738 16 Ningbo 79 64 72 48 59 70 70 99 66 110 737 17 Wuxi 74 69 44 42 88 87 58 59 79 127 727 18 Fuzhou 54 65 79 47 82 79 75 76 63 96 716 18 Guiyang 74 18 75 85 101 69 67 56 99 72 716 20 Dalian 62 59 73 63 107 34 59 61 107 90 715 21 Taiyuan 58 29 23 87 84 48 58 58 138 73 656 22 Shenyang 68 63 65 57 77 37 46 44 121 66 644 23 Urumqi 58 13 50 68 109 47 32 55 108 101 641 24 Shijiazhuang 55 37 38 71 57 56 36 56 125 71 602 25 Harbin 33 50 54 48 58 44 25 60 116 49 537 26 Lanzhou 31 22 38 52 89 37 37 50 81 61 498
9 PwC Intellectual capital Technical maturity Major regional Health, safety Transportation and Sustainable Culture and quality Economic clout Cost Ease of doing Score and innovation cities and public urban planning development and of life business security natural environment 1 Hangzhou 134 117 116 93 121 96 72 138 25 131 1043 2 Wuhan 121 117 110 81 111 80 73 114 77 124 1008 3 Nanjing 135 113 116 63 133 71 76 96 50 140 993 4 Chengdu 127 104 131 93 98 80 53 115 72 90 963 5 Xiamen 100 68 115 58 113 94 76 108 68 126 926 6 Xi'an 99 100 106 91 110 50 51 96 84 90 877 7 Tianjin 101 95 99 59 107 66 58 116 66 99 866 8 Changsha 104 69 91 79 97 96 76 99 56 97 864 9 Suzhou 101 110 74 49 82 74 63 74 83 142 852 10 Zhengzhou 75 58 78 79 108 80 34 77 94 114 797 11 Zhuhai 84 47 43 80 147 85 87 74 30 117 794 12 Qingdao 86 87 95 75 88 69 50 82 56 93 781 13 Jinan 69 70 88 78 85 76 33 90 66 93 748 14 Kunming 71 46 98 66 108 70 31 64 121 71 746 15 Chongqing 60 81 142 60 51 62 28 99 74 81 738 16 Ningbo 79 64 72 48 59 70 70 99 66 110 737 17 Wuxi 74 69 44 42 88 87 58 59 79 127 727 18 Fuzhou 54 65 79 47 82 79 75 76 63 96 716 18 Guiyang 74 18 75 85 101 69 67 56 99 72 716 20 Dalian 62 59 73 63 107 34 59 61 107 90 715 21 Taiyuan 58 29 23 87 84 48 58 58 138 73 656 22 Shenyang 68 63 65 57 77 37 46 44 121 66 644 23 Urumqi 58 13 50 68 109 47 32 55 108 101 641 24 Shijiazhuang 55 37 38 71 57 56 36 56 125 71 602 25 Harbin 33 50 54 48 58 44 25 60 116 49 537 26 Lanzhou 31 22 38 52 89 37 37 50 81 61 498
Chinese Cities of Opportunity 2018 10 I. Intellectual capital and innovation
The “Intellectual capital and education, albeit from different angles. innovation” dimension includes six The turnover of full-time teachers places variables. These are “turnover rate of particular emphasis on the changes to a full-time teachers”, “scale of secondary floating population. Emerging coastal vocational education”, “proportion of cities invariably rank in the top positions spending on science and technology”, for this variable. The scale of secondary “level of research and development”, vocational education variable observes “entrepreneurial environment” and the supply of skilled workers in a city. “innovation application”. Given the Graduates from technical secondary limited data sources, there are fewer schools often work in the same city, and variables in this dimension than in some technical secondary schools act as previous years. Therefore, the scores educational establishments for Together with the “level of research and and city ranking for the dimension are enterprises stationed in the city, development”, the two final variables of not directly comparable with the showing a strong relevance with the real the dimension relate to the respective scores from the preceding economy. So compared with the achievements of graduates and post- years. Based on the overall distribution observation of the size of graduates to some extent. They illustrate of the city ranking, however, no major undergraduates, this variable is more the state of scientific and technological changes to the bigger picture are conducive to demonstrating the long- innovation, and also reflect important observed. term impact of intellectual capital. factors for intellectual capital. Overall, Notably, Wuhan, Taiyuan, Guiyang, Nanjing, Hangzhou, Chengdu and Data shows that the top eight cities are Nanjing and Zhengzhou are top ranking Wuhan secured the top four positions in Nanjing, Hangzhou, Chengdu, Wuhan, cities for this variable, most of which are this dimension, each registering in the Changsha, Tianjin, Suzhou and Xiamen. industrial powerhouses. top positions of the six variables. The bottom eight cities are Dalian, Chongqing, Taiyuan, Urumqi, The top scorers for “proportion of As China emphasises a national strategy Shijiazhuang, Fuzhou, Harbin and spending on science and technology” of revitalising the country through Lanzhou. While the 10 cities in the include Zhuhai, Suzhou, Wuhan, science and technology, all cities have middle of the rankings are Xi’an, Hangzhou and Nanjing, showing the scientific advancement and application Qingdao, Zhuhai, Ningbo, Zhengzhou, demand in these cities for technology high up on their agendas. This onus is Guiyang, Wuxi, Kunming, Jinan and spending, as well as their relatively readily seen as one glances over the Shenyang. stable fiscal strength, underpinning mayor’s report on the government work technology spending. for each city. The different cities have Xiamen, Suzhou and Zhuhai secured the diverse industrial foundations and top three places in the variable of “Level of research and development” is a scientific resources, as well as distinctive “turnover rate of full-time teachers”, composite variable constituted of three development directions and speeds. We indicating the rigid demand for primary factors. Due to the limited data sources, can only provide a basic description of and secondary school teachers arising we do not have access to recent data, but the general conditions. Closer and from population growth. This trend is a comparison is still applicable. The deeper observations on each city would also observed in the “rate of change in highest ranked cities are Nanjing, be required for a more nuanced floating population” variable. Wuhan, Xi’an, Hangzhou and Tianjin. understanding of each city’s intellectual The “scale of secondary vocational The last two variables reflect capital cultivation and scientific education” and “turnover rate of entrepreneurship and innovation, with innovation. full-time teachers” variables are both the top three cities for these being aimed at observing adolescent Hangzhou, Chengdu and Nanjing.
11 PwC Turnover rate of Scale of Proportion of Level of research ntrepreneurial nnovation Total full time teachers secondary spending on and development environment application vocational science and education technology 1 Nanjing 16 23 22 26 24 24 135 2 Hangzhou 21 15 23 23 26 26 134 3 Chengdu 22 20 16 19 25 25 127 4 uhan 2 26 24 25 23 21 121 5 Changsha 23 6 13 21 19 22 104 6 Tianjin 13 8 19 22 21 18 101 6 Suzhou 25 5 25 4 22 20 101 8 iamen 26 9 15 12 20 18 100 9 i an 8 18 17 24 17 15 99 10 ingdao 14 16 8 21 13 14 86 11 Zhuhai 24 3 26 3 10 18 84 12 Ningbo 17 1 21 2 15 23 79 13 Zhengzhou 11 22 7 9 14 12 75 14 Guiyang 20 24 18 7 3 2 74 14 u i 10 11 20 6 8 19 74 16 Kunming 18 21 10 10 6 6 71 17 Jinan 15 19 5 15 12 3 69 18 Shenyang 4 14 14 16 11 9 68 19 Dalian 12 12 12 14 7 5 62 20 Chongqing 6 4 3 17 18 12 60 21 Taiyuan 7 25 9 11 5 1 58 21 rumqi 19 17 11 2 1 8 58 23 Shijiazhuang 9 13 6 8 9 10 55 24 Fuzhou 5 10 4 5 16 14 54 25 Harbin 1 2 1 18 4 7 33 26 Lanzhou 3 7 2 13 2 4 31
Chinese Cities of Opportunity 2018 12 I am pleased to see that intellectual capital and innovation ranks at the top Complementarity of the quantitative indicators of Chinese Cities of Opportunity. The core of intellectual capital and innovation is the between a research cultivation of human talent, and the core of cultivating human talent is university and education. The quantitative indicators used here for the evaluation of an intellectual- investment in intellectual capital for Chinese Cities of Opportunity include: spending on science and technology, innovative city level of research and development, entrepreneurial environment, and innovation application. To a large extent, these variables correlate positively, I believe, to the capacity- building of university in a city–in particular, research university. The development strategies of China’s many large cities highlight strengthening university capacity, Liu Hongxia especially in relation to top research universities. Strengthening university Associate Vice Chancellor, capacity does not however, mean NYU Shanghai building more universities. Rather, universities must embrace such a development goal from quantity to quality in order to cultivate more innovative talent for society. President Xi Jinping, at the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China declared: “We will move faster to build Chinese universities into world- class universities and develop world- class disciplines as we work to bring out the full potential of higher education.” Building world-class universities and world-class disciplines is a new measure by which cities and municipalities can pursue for the promotion of intelligence and innovation. There are numerous examples at home and abroad which
13 PwC demonstrate that a research university their respective host cities, a new other countries including the US, UK, and an intellectual-innovative city generation of “innovative” talent. Pakistan and the Philippines. All complement each other well and students engaged equally in the The cultivation of “innovative” talent promote mutual development. discussions and debates with John in and building of world-class universities and out of classroom. At the end of As the inner-quality demands on does not mean chasing immediate or semester when asked about their biggest Chinese universities increase, Chinese- fancy gains on the surface. Initially at gains from this course, the students foreign joint-venture institutions have NYU Shanghai, many parents want their answered that it was courage and sprung up as a new mode of higher children to study business and finance, capacity for independent analysis based learning. Examples include Xi’an so that they are on a fast track to become on facts, it was confidence for expressing Jiaotong-Liverpool University, senior executives or even presidents of their own thoughts, and it was University of Nottingham Ningbo China, enterprises, banks or investment temperament when seeking common New York University Shanghai (NYU companies. Our leadership and faculty ground amid different perspectives Shanghai), Duke Kunshan University, encourage our students and their across cultures. Wenzhou-Kean University, Beijing parents to take note of the fact that few Normal University-Hong Kong Baptist Chairs/CEOs of the world’s top 500 In conclusion, while some indicators University United International College, companies graduated with used here to evaluate investment in a The Chinese University of Hong Kong undergraduate majors in business and city’s intellectual capital and innovation Shenzhen, Guangdong Technion Israel finance. Many instead studied subjects environment can be quantified, others Institute of Technology, and Shenzhen such as history, literature, philosophy, cannot. Even if some indicators cannot MSU-BIT University. Notably, these mathematics or art. Our university be quantified, it doesn’t necessarily universities, as independent legal stresses the importance of a liberal arts mean that they are unimportant. In the entities, are located in Shanghai or other education. Students can choose their long-term, support for and acceleration coastal cities-which lead their peers in majors based on their own interests of the building of world-class indicators of intellectual investment and after a two-year general education. They universities and world-class disciplines innovation in Chinese Cities of can also study for one to two semesters will come to serve as a viable bridge for Opportunity. These cities all enjoy a high in another campus within New York host cities to enhance investment in degree of internationality and their local University’s global network, which intellectual capital and environment for governments, enterprises, communities spans 13 other top cities around the innovation. Several key factors, such as and citizens are relatively open and world. Consequently, students can liberal arts education with international inclusive for these “mixed-blood” pursue their own dreams and careers, perspectives, heuristic teaching method, institutions. Such factors ultimately lead maintain their spontaneity and encouragement of critical thinking, and to, in varying degrees, access to enthusiasm, and broaden their an academic atmosphere premised on financial and material resources and at international perspectives. tolerant and inclusive communication, the same time recognition in stature and can determine whether Chinese Over a year ago, I assisted John Sexton, accommodation in policy. As a result, universities will succeed in inner- the former President of New York these institutions are well placed to capacity building and advance into the University, to teach an undergraduate apply internationally advanced world’s top rank, while delivering elective course at NYU Shanghai. John pedagogy, curriculum, and faculty and innovative talent in the future applied the Socratic heuristic teaching student management. In serving as an generations. method throughout the entire course, “experimental field” for China’s reform encouraging students to seek out facts, in the higher learning and cultivation of raise questions, and conduct debates. world-class universities, these joint- The class catered to 18 students, half of venture universities are grooming, in them hailed from China, and half from
Chengdu Tianfu Software Park
Chinese Cities of Opportunity 2018 14 II. Technical maturity