História Da Ciência

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

História Da Ciência Carlos Augusto de Proença 599 O desenvolvimento da Carlos Augusto de Proença Rosa Carlos Rosa, nascido no Rio de Janeiro em Augusto de Proença Rosa Carlos Ciência pura e a crescente aceita- 4 de setembro de 1931, formou-se ção do pensamento científico no pelo Instituto Rio Branco em 1954. O Tomo II trata exclusivamente da evolução do meio cultural caracterizam este Em seus quarenta anos de serviço conhecimento científico no século XIX, ainda com a Europa HistóriaHistória dada CiênciaCiência período da Ciência Moderna, cuja ativo no Itamaraty trabalhou na como principal centro de formulação teórica e de pesquisa função social é, por primeira vez, Secretaria de Estado nos setores de laboratorial. Esse período se caracteriza pelo extraordinário VolumeVolume IIII reconhecida nos círculos oficiais e Comunicações, Político e Produtos progresso da pesquisa em todos os ramos da Ciência, como em pela opinião pública. Um grande de Base, chefiou o Departamento Matemática (Teoria dos Números, Teoria dos Grupos, Geometria TomoTomo IIIIII progresso nas pesquisas, nos diver- Econômico por sete anos e, no não euclidiana, Topologia), Astronomia (Astrofísica, Sistema sos ramos científicos, permitiria a exterior, serviu nas Embaixadas Solar), Física (Termodinâmica, Eletromagnetismo, ampliação do conhecimento dos em Lima, Washington, Londres, Radioatividade), Química (Tabela dos Elementos, Química OO PensamentoPensamento CientíficoCientífico ee aa CiênciaCiência fenômenos e a criação de novas Pequim, Cairo, bem como Dublin e Orgânica, Química Industrial). Tais avanços em Ciência Teórica e áreas, como a Geometria não nas representações diplomáticas Aplicada possibilitariam a Segunda Revolução Industrial, de nono SéculoSéculo XIXXIX euclidiana, a Astrofísica, a Termo- junto à ALALC (Montevidéu) e às grande repercussão econômica e social, e a afirmação do dinâmica e o Eletromagnetismo, a Nações Unidas em Viena (UNIDO, pensamento científico. É nesse período que se estruturaria a Química Orgânica e a Química AIEA). Proença Rosa abriu as Biologia (Microbiologia, Embriologia, Teoria Celular, Evolução) Industrial, a Microbiologia e Evo- Embaixadas do Brasil em Pequim e e seria criada a Sociologia. Diante dos evidentes benefícios CarlosCarlos AugustoAugusto dede ProençaProença RosaRosa lução. A Biologia se estruturaria e resultantes das pesquisas científicas para a Sociedade, sua e a Ciência no Século XIX Dublin e foi promovido a Embai- e a Ciência no Século XIX uma nova Ciência, a Sociologia, O Pensamento Científico xador em março de 1979. atividade seria prestigiada pelos setores públicos e privados dos O Pensamento Científico seria criada, incluindo, assim, os História da Ciência Participou de um grande países industrializados, os quais reconheceriam seu valor História da Ciência 2ª Edição fenômenos sociais no âmbito da número de conferências interna- estratégico. metodologia científica. Ciências cionais nas áreas de comércio, auxiliares, mas não menos energia, ciência e tecnologia, importantes que as fundamentais, finanças e produtos de base em se desenvolveriam (Geologia, diversos foros multilaterais Meteorologia, Mineralogia) ou (UNCTAD, GATT, FMI, BID, seriam criadas (Arqueologia, AIEA, UNIDO, CEPAL, ALALC, Paleontologia, Antropologia, Grupo dos 77), integrou a Psicologia), contribuindo para um delegação brasileira à Reunião melhor conhecimento do Mundo e Internacional de Cooperação e do Homem. O autor assinala a Desenvolvimento (Cancun, 1981) importância das universidades, das e atuou como delegado em academias e dos novos centros de negociações de política econômi- pesquisa no desenvolvimento da ca, energética, científica e de Ciência Moderna. transportes, tendo sido também representante do Itamaraty no CONMETRO. Volume II Tomo II ISBN 857631395-2 Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão www.funag.gov.br 9 788576 313953 Carlos Augusto de Proença 599 O desenvolvimento da Carlos Augusto de Proença Rosa Carlos Rosa, nascido no Rio de Janeiro em Augusto de Proença Rosa Carlos Ciência pura e a crescente aceita- 4 de setembro de 1931, formou-se ção do pensamento científico no pelo Instituto Rio Branco em 1954. O Tomo II trata exclusivamente da evolução do meio cultural caracterizam este Em seus quarenta anos de serviço conhecimento científico no século XIX, ainda com a Europa HistóriaHistória dada CiênciaCiência período da Ciência Moderna, cuja ativo no Itamaraty trabalhou na como principal centro de formulação teórica e de pesquisa função social é, por primeira vez, Secretaria de Estado nos setores de laboratorial. Esse período se caracteriza pelo extraordinário VolumeVolume IIII reconhecida nos círculos oficiais e Comunicações, Político e Produtos progresso da pesquisa em todos os ramos da Ciência, como em pela opinião pública. Um grande de Base, chefiou o Departamento Matemática (Teoria dos Números, Teoria dos Grupos, Geometria TomoTomo IIIIII progresso nas pesquisas, nos diver- Econômico por sete anos e, no não euclidiana, Topologia), Astronomia (Astrofísica, Sistema sos ramos científicos, permitiria a exterior, serviu nas Embaixadas Solar), Física (Termodinâmica, Eletromagnetismo, ampliação do conhecimento dos em Lima, Washington, Londres, Radioatividade), Química (Tabela dos Elementos, Química OO PensamentoPensamento CientíficoCientífico ee aa CiênciaCiência fenômenos e a criação de novas Pequim, Cairo, bem como Dublin e Orgânica, Química Industrial). Tais avanços em Ciência Teórica e áreas, como a Geometria não nas representações diplomáticas Aplicada possibilitariam a Segunda Revolução Industrial, de nono SéculoSéculo XIXXIX euclidiana, a Astrofísica, a Termo- junto à ALALC (Montevidéu) e às grande repercussão econômica e social, e a afirmação do dinâmica e o Eletromagnetismo, a Nações Unidas em Viena (UNIDO, pensamento científico. É nesse período que se estruturaria a Química Orgânica e a Química AIEA). Proença Rosa abriu as Biologia (Microbiologia, Embriologia, Teoria Celular, Evolução) Industrial, a Microbiologia e Evo- Embaixadas do Brasil em Pequim e e seria criada a Sociologia. Diante dos evidentes benefícios CarlosCarlos AugustoAugusto dede ProençaProença RosaRosa lução. A Biologia se estruturaria e resultantes das pesquisas científicas para a Sociedade, sua e a Ciência no Século XIX Dublin e foi promovido a Embai- e a Ciência no Século XIX uma nova Ciência, a Sociologia, O Pensamento Científico xador em março de 1979. atividade seria prestigiada pelos setores públicos e privados dos O Pensamento Científico seria criada, incluindo, assim, os História da Ciência Participou de um grande países industrializados, os quais reconheceriam seu valor História da Ciência 2ª Edição fenômenos sociais no âmbito da número de conferências interna- estratégico. metodologia científica. Ciências cionais nas áreas de comércio, auxiliares, mas não menos energia, ciência e tecnologia, importantes que as fundamentais, finanças e produtos de base em se desenvolveriam (Geologia, diversos foros multilaterais Meteorologia, Mineralogia) ou (UNCTAD, GATT, FMI, BID, seriam criadas (Arqueologia, AIEA, UNIDO, CEPAL, ALALC, Paleontologia, Antropologia, Grupo dos 77), integrou a Psicologia), contribuindo para um delegação brasileira à Reunião melhor conhecimento do Mundo e Internacional de Cooperação e do Homem. O autor assinala a Desenvolvimento (Cancun, 1981) importância das universidades, das e atuou como delegado em academias e dos novos centros de negociações de política econômi- pesquisa no desenvolvimento da ca, energética, científica e de Ciência Moderna. transportes, tendo sido também representante do Itamaraty no CONMETRO. Volume II Tomo II ISBN 857631395-2 Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão www.funag.gov.br 9 788576 313953 HISTÓRIA DA CIÊNCIA O Pensamento Científico e a Ciência no Século XIX Volume II Tomo II MINISTÉRIO DAS RELAÇÕES EXTERIORES Ministro de Estado Embaixador Antonio de Aguiar Patriota Secretário-Geral Embaixador Ruy Nunes Pinto Nogueira FUNDAÇÃO ALEXANDRE DE GUSMÃO Presidente Embaixador José Vicente de Sá Pimentel Instituto de Pesquisa de Relações Internacionais Centro de História e Documentação Diplomática Diretor Embaixador Maurício E. Cortes Costa A Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão, instituída em 1971, é uma fundação pública vinculada ao Ministério das Relações Exteriores e tem a finalidade de levar à sociedade civil informações sobre a realidade internacional e sobre aspectos da pauta diplomática brasileira. Sua missão é promover a sensibilização da opinião pública nacional para os temas de relações internacionais e para a política externa brasileira. Ministério das Relações Exteriores Esplanada dos Ministérios, Bloco H Anexo II, Térreo, Sala 1 70170-900 Brasília, DF Telefones: (61) 2030-6033/6034 Fax: (61) 2030-9125 Site: www.funag.gov.br Carlos Augusto de Proença Rosa HISTÓRIA DA CIÊNCIA O Pensamento Científico e a Ciência no Século XIX Volume II - Tomo II 2ª Edição Brasília, 2012 Direitos de publicação reservados à Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão Ministério das Relações Exteriores Esplanada dos Ministérios, Bloco H Anexo II, Térreo 70170-900 Brasília – DF Telefones: (61) 2030-6033/6034 Fax: (61) 2030-9125 Site: www.funag.gov.br E-mail: [email protected] Equipe Técnica: Eliane Miranda Paiva Fernanda Antunes Siqueira Fernanda Leal Wanderley Gabriela Del Rio de Rezende Jessé Nóbrega Cardoso Rafael Ramos da Luz Wellington Solon de Souza Lima de Araújo Capa: Rafael Sanzio, A Escola de Atenas Programação Visual e Diagramação: Gráfica e Editora Ideal Impresso no Brasil 2012 R788 ROSA, Carlos Augusto de Proença. História da ciência: o pensamento científico
Recommended publications
  • Matthias Jacob Schleiden (1804–1881) [1]
    Published on The Embryo Project Encyclopedia (https://embryo.asu.edu) Matthias Jacob Schleiden (1804–1881) [1] By: Parker, Sara Keywords: cells [2] Matthias Jacob Schleiden helped develop the cell theory in Germany during the nineteenth century. Schleiden studied cells as the common element among all plants and animals. Schleiden contributed to the field of embryology [3] through his introduction of the Zeiss [4] microscope [5] lens and via his work with cells and cell theory as an organizing principle of biology. Schleiden was born in Hamburg, Germany, on 5 April 1804. His father was the municipal physician of Hamburg. Schleiden pursued legal studies at the University of Heidelberg [6] in Heidelberg, Germany, and he graduated in 1827. He established a legal practice in Hamburg, but after a period of emotional depression and an attempted suicide, he changed professions. He studied natural science at the University of Göttingen in Göttingen, Germany, but transferred to the University of Berlin [7] in Berlin, Germany, in 1835 to study plants. Johann Horkel, Schleiden's uncle, encouraged him to study plant embryology [3]. In Berlin, Schleiden worked in the laboratory of zoologistJ ohannes Müller [8], where he met Theodor Schwann. Both Schleiden and Schwann studied cell theory and phytogenesis, the origin and developmental history of plants. They aimed to find a unit of organisms common to the animal and plant kingdoms. They began a collaboration, and later scientists often called Schleiden and Schwann the founders of cell theory. In 1838, Schleiden published "Beiträge zur Phytogenesis" (Contributions to Our Knowledge of Phytogenesis). The article outlined his theories of the roles cells played as plants developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Catholic Christian Christian
    Religious Scientists (From the Vatican Observatory Website) https://www.vofoundation.org/faith-and-science/religious-scientists/ Many scientists are religious people—men and women of faith—believers in God. This section features some of the religious scientists who appear in different entries on these Faith and Science pages. Some of these scientists are well-known, others less so. Many are Catholic, many are not. Most are Christian, but some are not. Some of these scientists of faith have lived saintly lives. Many scientists who are faith-full tend to describe science as an effort to understand the works of God and thus to grow closer to God. Quite a few describe their work in science almost as a duty they have to seek to improve the lives of their fellow human beings through greater understanding of the world around them. But the people featured here are featured because they are scientists, not because they are saints (even when they are, in fact, saints). Scientists tend to be creative, independent-minded and confident of their ideas. We also maintain a longer listing of scientists of faith who may or may not be discussed on these Faith and Science pages—click here for that listing. Agnesi, Maria Gaetana (1718-1799) Catholic Christian A child prodigy who obtained education and acclaim for her abilities in math and physics, as well as support from Pope Benedict XIV, Agnesi would write an early calculus textbook. She later abandoned her work in mathematics and physics and chose a life of service to those in need. Click here for Vatican Observatory Faith and Science entries about Maria Gaetana Agnesi.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Atomism and Cell Theory
    Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41 (2010) 202–211 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/shpsc Biological atomism and cell theory Daniel J. Nicholson ESRC Research Centre for Genomics in Society (Egenis), University of Exeter, Byrne House, St. Germans Road, Exeter EX4 4PJ, UK article info abstract Keywords: Biological atomism postulates that all life is composed of elementary and indivisible vital units. The activ- Biological atomism ity of a living organism is thus conceived as the result of the activities and interactions of its elementary Cell theory constituents, each of which individually already exhibits all the attributes proper to life. This paper sur- Organismal theory veys some of the key episodes in the history of biological atomism, and situates cell theory within this Reductionism tradition. The atomistic foundations of cell theory are subsequently dissected and discussed, together with the theory’s conceptual development and eventual consolidation. This paper then examines the major criticisms that have been waged against cell theory, and argues that these too can be interpreted through the prism of biological atomism as attempts to relocate the true biological atom away from the cell to a level of organization above or below it. Overall, biological atomism provides a useful perspective through which to examine the history and philosophy of cell theory, and it also opens up a new way of thinking about the epistemic decomposition of living organisms that significantly departs from the phys- icochemical reductionism of mechanistic biology.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Look at Loschmidt's Representations of Benzene
    Bull. Hist. Chem., VOLUME 38, Number 1 (2013) 29 150 YEARS AFTER THEIR EMERGENCE: A NEW LOOK AT LOSCHMIDT’S REPRESENTATIONS OF BENZENE Heinz D. Roth, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Wright-Rieman Laboratories, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08854-8087, [email protected] Abstract to Kekulé’s theories, because, in the summary of Alan Rocke, they were “at once too empirical and too specula- A new examination of structures that Loschmidt tive” (10); von Meyer criticized Kekulé for not giving considered for benzene derivatives, notably naphthalene credit to Frankland for the concept of valence or to Kolbe and “rings” doubly bonded to O or triply bonded to N, or for his many contributions (11). show conclusively that Loschmidt did not view benzene More recent criticism has its roots in the work as a planar ring of six carbon atoms. of Kekulé’s biographer and successor on the Chair in Bonn, Richard Anschütz. While compiling material for Introduction his two-volume Kekulé biography (12), Anschütz found references to Couper (13), who had developed the idea August Kekulé has long been credited with several of linking carbon atoms independent of Kekulé; he also major contributions to structural organic chemistry: rec- noticed a footnote in Kekulé’s 1865 paper concerning ognizing the tetravalence of carbon (1857) (1,2); recog- structural formulae by Loschmidt. This 1861 article (14) nizing that carbon atoms combine with one another to had been published outside of the established chemical form chains (1858) (3); and recognizing the structure of literature and was not readily available. Anschütz noted benzene (1865) (4), in the view of Japp, the “crowning that Loschmidt’s booklet was hard to read (15); therefore, achievement of the doctrine of the linking of atoms” (5).
    [Show full text]
  • Back Matter (PDF)
    INDEX TO THE PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS (A) FOR THE YEAR 1894. A. Arc spectrum of electrolytic ,iron on the photographic, 983 (see Lockyer). B. Bakerian L ecture.—On the Relations between the Viscosity (Internal 1 riction) of Liquids and then Chemical Nature, 397 (see T iiorpe and R odger). Bessemer process, the spectroscopic phenomena and thermo-chemistry of the, 1041 IIarimo). C. Capstick (J. W.). On the Ratio of the Specific Heats of the Paraffins, and their Monohalogei.. Derivatives, 1. Carbon dioxide, on the specific heat of, at constant volume, 943 (sec ). Carbon dioxide, the specific heat of, as a function of temperatuie, ddl (mo I j . , , Crystals, an instrument of precision for producing monochromatic light of any desire. ua\e- eng », * its use in the investigation of the optical properties of, did (see it MDCCCXCIV.— A. ^ <'rystals of artificial preparations, an instrument for grinding section-plates and prisms of, 887 (see Tutton). Cubic surface, on a special form of the general equation of a, and on a diagram representing the twenty- seven lines on the surface, 37 (see Taylor). •Cables, on plane, 247 (see Scott). D. D unkeelky (S.). On the Whirling and Vibration of Shafts, 279. Dynamical theory of the electric and luminifei’ous medium, a, 719 (see Larmor). E. Eclipse of the sun, April 16, 1893, preliminary report on the results obtained with the prismatic cameras during the total, 711 (see Lockyer). Electric and luminiferous medium, a dynamical theory of the, 719 (see Larmor). Electrolytic iron, on the photographic arc spectrum of, 983 (see Lockyer). Equation of the general cubic surface, 37 (see Taylor).
    [Show full text]
  • Avogadro's Constant
    Avogadro's Constant Nancy Eisenmenger Question Artem, 8th grade How \Avogadro constant" was invented and how scientists calculated it for the first time? Answer What is Avogadro's Constant? • Avogadros constant, NA: the number of particles in a mole • mole: The number of Carbon-12 atoms in 0.012 kg of Carbon-12 23 −1 • NA = 6:02214129(27) × 10 mol How was Avogadro's Constant Invented? Avogadro's constant was invented because scientists were learning about measuring matter and wanted a way to relate the microscopic to the macroscopic (e.g. how many particles (atoms, molecules, etc.) were in a sample of matter). The first scientists to see a need for Avogadro's constant were studying gases and how they behave under different temperatures and pressures. Amedeo Avogadro did not invent the constant, but he did state that all gases with the same volume, pressure, and temperature contained the same number of gas particles, which turned out to be very important to the development of our understanding of the principles of chemistry and physics. The constant was first calculated by Johann Josef Loschmidt, a German scientist, in 1865. He actually calculated the Loschmidt number, a constant that measures the same thing as Avogadro's number, but in different units (ideal gas particles per cubic meter at 0◦C and 1 atm). When converted to the same units, his number was off by about a factor of 10 from Avogadro's number. That may sound like a lot, but given the tools he had to work with for both theory and experiment and the magnitude of the number (∼ 1023), that is an impressively close estimate.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophical Transactions (A)
    INDEX TO THE PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS (A) FOR THE YEAR 1889. A. A bney (W. de W.). Total Eclipse of the San observed at Caroline Island, on 6th May, 1883, 119. A bney (W. de W.) and T horpe (T. E.). On the Determination of the Photometric Intensity of the Coronal Light during the Solar Eclipse of August 28-29, 1886, 363. Alcohol, a study of the thermal properties of propyl, 137 (see R amsay and Y oung). Archer (R. H.). Observations made by Newcomb’s Method on the Visibility of Extension of the Coronal Streamers at Hog Island, Grenada, Eclipse of August 28-29, 1886, 382. Atomic weight of gold, revision of the, 395 (see Mallet). B. B oys (C. V.). The Radio-Micrometer, 159. B ryan (G. H.). The Waves on a Rotating Liquid Spheroid of Finite Ellipticity, 187. C. Conroy (Sir J.). Some Observations on the Amount of Light Reflected and Transmitted by Certain 'Kinds of Glass, 245. Corona, on the photographs of the, obtained at Prickly Point and Carriacou Island, total solar eclipse, August 29, 1886, 347 (see W esley). Coronal light, on the determination of the, during the solar eclipse of August 28-29, 1886, 363 (see Abney and Thorpe). Coronal streamers, observations made by Newcomb’s Method on the Visibility of, Eclipse of August 28-29, 1886, 382 (see A rcher). Cosmogony, on the mechanical conditions of a swarm of meteorites, and on theories of, 1 (see Darwin). Currents induced in a spherical conductor by variation of an external magnetic potential, 513 (see Lamb). 520 INDEX.
    [Show full text]
  • Physiker-Entdeckungen Und Erdzeiten Hans Ulrich Stalder 31.1.2019
    Physiker-Entdeckungen und Erdzeiten Hans Ulrich Stalder 31.1.2019 Haftungsausschluss / Disclaimer / Hyperlinks Für fehlerhafte Angaben und deren Folgen kann weder eine juristische Verantwortung noch irgendeine Haftung übernommen werden. Änderungen vorbehalten. Ich distanziere mich hiermit ausdrücklich von allen Inhalten aller verlinkten Seiten und mache mir diese Inhalte nicht zu eigen. Erdzeiten Erdzeit beginnt vor x-Millionen Jahren Quartär 2,588 Neogen 23,03 (erste Menschen vor zirka 4 Millionen Jahren) Paläogen 66 Kreide 145 (Dinosaurier) Jura 201,3 Trias 252,2 Perm 298,9 Karbon 358,9 Devon 419,2 Silur 443,4 Ordovizium 485,4 Kambrium 541 Ediacarium 635 Cryogenium 850 Tonium 1000 Stenium 1200 Ectasium 1400 Calymmium 1600 Statherium 1800 Orosirium 2050 Rhyacium 2300 Siderium 2500 Physiker Entdeckungen Jahr 0800 v. Chr.: Den Babyloniern sind Sonnenfinsterniszyklen mit der Sarosperiode (rund 18 Jahre) bekannt. Jahr 0580 v. Chr.: Die Erde wird nach einer Theorie von Anaximander als Kugel beschrieben. Jahr 0550 v. Chr.: Die Entdeckung von ganzzahligen Frequenzverhältnissen bei konsonanten Klängen (Pythagoras in der Schmiede) führt zur ersten überlieferten und zutreffenden quantitativen Beschreibung eines physikalischen Sachverhalts. © Hans Ulrich Stalder, Switzerland Jahr 0500 v. Chr.: Demokrit postuliert, dass die Natur aus Atomen zusammengesetzt sei. Jahr 0450 v. Chr.: Vier-Elemente-Lehre von Empedokles. Jahr 0300 v. Chr.: Euklid begründet anhand der Reflexion die geometrische Optik. Jahr 0265 v. Chr.: Zum ersten Mal wird die Theorie des Heliozentrischen Weltbildes mit geometrischen Berechnungen von Aristarchos von Samos belegt. Jahr 0250 v. Chr.: Archimedes entdeckt das Hebelgesetz und die statische Auftriebskraft in Flüssigkeiten, Archimedisches Prinzip. Jahr 0240 v. Chr.: Eratosthenes bestimmt den Erdumfang mit einer Gradmessung zwischen Alexandria und Syene.
    [Show full text]
  • Eduard Uhlenhuth/Anatomy Department Library
    Dr. Eduard Uhlenhuth Papers Item Type Other Authors Wink, Tara Publication Date 2020-12-11 Abstract Dr. Eduard Uhlenhuth was a professor of Anatomy at the University of Maryland School of Medicine from 1925 until his retirement in 1955. In 1957 he was named professor emeritus. He was an avid book collector amassing an extensive collection of Anatom... Keywords Uhlenhuth, Eduard; Department of Anatomy; Anatomical Book Collection; Anatomy; Anatomy--education; Anatomists; University of Maryland, Baltimore; University of Maryland, Baltimore. School of Medicine; Medical education Rights Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Download date 28/09/2021 04:39:25 Item License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10713/14245 Eduard Uhlenhuth/Anatomy Department Library Title Author Date Found in Cat Notes De Medicina Aulus Cornelius Celsus 1497 Cordell Coll "On Medicine" Matthaei Curtii…In Mundini Anatomen Commentarius Elegans & Docties Mondino dei Luzzi 1551 Cordell Coll De conceptu et generatione hominis : et iis quae circa hȩc potissimum consyderantur, libri sex Jakob Rueff 1554 Cordell Coll "On Conception and Generation in Man" Gabrielis Falloppii medici Mutinensis Obseruationes anatomicae Gabriel Fallopius/Falloppio 1562 Cordell Coll Theatrum anatomicum Caspar Bauhin 1605 Cordell Coll 1st ed. De lactibus sive lacteis venis Gaspare Aselli 1627 Cordell Coll Syntagma anatomicum Johann Vesling 1647 Cordel Coll Corporis hvmani disqvisitio anatomica Nathaniel Highmore 1651 Cordell Coll
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter (PDF)
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON. (B.) FOR THE YEAR MDCCCLXXXVII. VOL. 178. LONDON: PRINTED BY HARRISON AND SONS, ST. MARTIN’S LANE, W C., printers in Ordinary to Her Majesty. MDCCCLXXXVIII. ADVERTISEMENT. The Committee appointed by the Royal Society to direct the publication of the Philosophical Transactions take this opportunity to acquaint the public that it fully appears, as well from the Council-books and Journals of the Society as from repeated declarations which have been made in several former , that the printing of them was always, from time to time, the single act of the respective Secretaries till the Forty-seventh Volume; the Society, as a Body, never interesting themselves any further in their publication than by occasionally recommending the revival of them to some of their Secretaries, when, from the particular circumstances of their affairs, the Transactions had happened for any length of time to be intermitted. And this seems principally to have been done with a view to satisfy the public that their usual meetings were then continued, for the improvement of knowledge and benefit of mankind : the great ends of their first institution by the Boyal Charters, and which they have ever since steadily pursued. But the Society being of late years greatly enlarged, and their communications more numerous, it was thought advisable that a Committee of their members should be appointed to reconsider the papers read before them, and select out of them such as. they should judge most proper for publication in the future Transactions; which was accordingly done upon the 26th of March, 1752.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cell Theory Notes
    The Cell Theory Notes 1. Many important scientists aided in the discovery of the cell and the formulation of the cell theory. Scientist Contribution Zacharias Janssen Anton Von Leeuwenhoek Robert Hooke Matthias Schleiden Theodor Schwann Rudolf Virchow The Cell Theory 1 2. The Cell Theory a. all organisms are made of b. are the basic units of structure and function for all things c. All cells come from other _. Match the scientist with the correct letter stating his contribution to cell discovery. 1. Zacharias Janssen A German histologist that concluded all cells come from other cells 2. Rudolf Virchow B German physiologist that concluded all animals are made of cells 3. Robert Hooke C Came up with the word "cell" after studying cork under the microscope 4. Theodor Schwann D German botanist who concluded that all plants are made of cells 5. Anton Von Leeuwenhoek E Dutch tradesman who made the first simple microscope 6. Matthias Schleiden F Dutch scientist that built a compound microscope with his father. All living things, plant or animal, have one thing in common. Which of the following is the common thing? A They all have cells that are held up by cell walls. B They all have the same way to get water and food into their cells. C They all have cells. D They all have special cells that can do many different things. In all living things, the presence of what structure supports the cell theory. A cell wall B cell membrane C vacuole D chloroplast 4 The Cell Theory One of the most important general However, the credit for pulling it all together principles in the science of biology is the usually goes to a pair of German scientists.
    [Show full text]
  • 'How?' Arxiv:2107.02558V1 [Physics.Hist-Ph] 6 Jul 2021
    Understanding Physics: ‘What?’, ‘Why?’, and ‘How?’ Mario Hubert California Institute of Technology Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences —— Forthcoming in the European Journal for Philosophy of Science July 7, 2021 I want to combine two hitherto largely independent research projects, scientific un- derstanding and mechanistic explanations. Understanding is not only achieved by answering why-questions, that is, by providing scientific explanations, but also by answering what-questions, that is, by providing what I call scientific descriptions. Based on this distinction, I develop three forms of understanding: understanding-what, understanding-why, and understanding-how. I argue that understanding-how is a par- ticularly deep form of understanding, because it is based on mechanistic explanations, which answer why something happens in virtue of what it is made of. I apply the three forms of understanding to two case studies: first, to the historical development of ther- modynamics and, second, to the differences between the Clausius and the Boltzmann entropy in explaining thermodynamic processes. arXiv:2107.02558v1 [physics.hist-ph] 6 Jul 2021 i Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Scientific Inquiry as Asking ‘Why?’ and ‘What?’ 3 2.1 The Origin and Epistemic Goals of Scientific Inquiry . 3 2.2 Scientific Descriptions and Aristotle’s Four Causes . 6 3 Scientific Descriptions and Mechanisms 10 4 A Critique of Current Theories of Understanding 11 4.1 Grimm’s Account . 12 4.2 De Regt’s Contextual Theory of Understanding . 14 5 Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics 17 5.1 Understanding in the Historical Development . 18 5.2 Entropy: Clausius and Boltzmann . 24 5.2.1 Clausius Entropy .
    [Show full text]