DOCSLIB.ORG

Summary of Responses Received to 1) the Hart Local Plan Refined

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Summary of Responses Received to 1) the Hart Local Plan Refined Summary of responses received to 1) The Hart Local Plan Refined Housing Options Consultation 2016 2) The Draft Vision for Hart Contents Responses to the Refined Housing Options ............................................................................................ 3 Q1. Do you have any comments on how to meet the needs of specialist groups such as affordable and Starter Homes, Custom or self-build homes, specialist homes for older people, and sites for the Travelling Community? ................................................................................................................. 3 General Comments ......................................................................................................................... 3 Affordable and Starter Homes ........................................................................................................ 5 Custom or Self-build Homes ........................................................................................................... 7 Specialist homes for older people .................................................................................................. 7 Sites for the travelling community .................................................................................................. 8 Q2a Where are the sites within Hart District that you think may be appropriate for Affordable and Starter Homes? ................................................................................................................................. 10 Q2b Where are the sites within Hart District that you think may be appropriate for Custom and Self Build? .......................................................................................................................................... 13 Q2c Where are the sites within Hart District that you think may be appropriate for Homes for older people? .................................................................................................................................... 15 Q2d Where are the sites within Hart District that you think may be appropriate for Travelling communities?.................................................................................................................................... 17 Q3 Do you agree with the current Settlement Hierarchy – Yes or No? ............................................ 19 Q4. Primary Approaches .................................................................................................................. 22 Q5. Combined Approaches ............................................................................................................... 28 Q6 The New Homes Sites Booklet shows, by Parish, sites that are available for the development of new homes. ....................................................................................................................................... 35 Blackwater and Hawley ................................................................................................................. 35 Bramshill ....................................................................................................................................... 36 Church Crookham ......................................................................................................................... 36 Crondall ......................................................................................................................................... 37 Crookham Village .......................................................................................................................... 38 Dogmersfield ................................................................................................................................. 38 Elvetham Heath ............................................................................................................................. 39 Eversley ......................................................................................................................................... 40 Ewshot ........................................................................................................................................... 41 Fleet .............................................................................................................................................. 42 Greywell ........................................................................................................................................ 43 Hartley Wintney ............................................................................................................................ 44 Heckfield ....................................................................................................................................... 45 Hook .............................................................................................................................................. 46 Page 1 of 108 Long Sutton ................................................................................................................................... 47 Mattingley ..................................................................................................................................... 48 Odiham .......................................................................................................................................... 49 Rotherwick .................................................................................................................................... 50 South Warnborough ..................................................................................................................... 51 Winchfield ..................................................................................................................................... 52 Yateley ........................................................................................................................................... 52 Q7. Do you have any other comments on the refined housing options paper? .............................. 54 Comments regarding the Draft Vision and Strategic Priorities for Hart ............................................... 59 Q1. We have identified a set of key issues for the Local Plan in table 1 on page 5. Do you agree with them? ........................................................................................................................................ 59 Q2. We have drafted a vision setting out how the district might look by 2032 on page 6. To what extent do you agree with it? ............................................................................................................. 63 Q3. We have identified some draft strategic priorities for the Local Plan in table 2 on page 7 & 8. Do you agree with them? ................................................................................................................. 67 Individual Representations ................................................................................................................... 72 Page 2 of 108 Responses to the Refined Housing Options Q1. Do you have any comments on how to meet the needs of specialist groups such as affordable and Starter Homes, Custom or self-build homes, specialist homes for older people, and sites for the Travelling Community? Number of Summary of Comments comments General Comments Use brownfield sites first 240 In a new settlement - Fleet/Church Crookham over-built 124 SHMA is out of date, jobs forecast too high so remove 2000 for Hart's need for housing 102 Mixed with all other developments, avoid segregation 67 Where there is an existing community/close to Fleet to take advantage of transport & infrastructure 64 Important to consider infrastructure 55 Disperse new housing across area, reducing density 30 Complete range of homes needs to be built, not only large houses 28 Proportion of any new development should be for specialist groups 24 Why is Hart absorbing extra building from Surrey and other locations?/should not have to 20 Needs to be balanced and considered regarding location for wider community including specialist groups 20 Build higher-rise/flats wherever possible to minimise sprawl 15 All of these groups should be considered/included with their special needs 15 Proper research needed at local level rather than estimates based on statistics, consult with these groups to understand needs 13 Housing in Hart is too expensive for first time buyers and military families 9 New builds should be on or near public transport routes 9 Area is saturated, we do not need or want any further homes 8 Better use of military land inc. RAF Odiham 7 No more homes on flood plains or land adjacent to areas susceptible to flooding 5 Understanding of demographic is key to considering location 5 Build eco homes, zero carbon, use good quality energy efficient materials 5 Build more houses, not only retirement homes 5 Build more council houses 4 Locate affordable and other specialist houses in clusters 4 Fleet should not be default option/is too overcrowded 4 Offer prebuilt homes to speed up construction time and reduce costs 4 Not new development at Winchfield, costs don't stack up and ignorance of infrastructure requirements 4 Page 3 of 108 Need to measure how many 1 & 2-bed properties and for older people have been built or permitted already 4 Allocate sites of sufficient size to secure such provision 3 All groups have different needs and cannot be integrated on one large development 3 Most locations should be considered
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Simplified BSA Volunteer Position Descriptions Wood Badge Project by Kent Nuttall Version August 27, 2018
    Simplified BSA Volunteer Position Descriptions Wood Badge Project by Kent Nuttall Version August 27, 2018 Several Units and Districts struggle getting adults to volunteer especially for leadership positions. There are a variety of reasons for this struggle, including: • Parents today feel they are too busy to take on volunteer assignments • Parents asked perceive any Scout volunteer assignment will be too time consuming or is well above their ability • The current position descriptions spend undue focus on responsibilities, and look complex. This project focuses on simplifying position descriptions and changing their focus to highlight the few outputs expected along with resources that will help them succeed. Further support includes guidance for using the new position descriptions. FEEDBACK IS REQUESTED These are still in development. Please feel free to send feedback to [email protected]. Before using or sending feedback, read more about the position descriptions to understand the format and content provided. Using the Position Descriptions The position descriptions have the following design characteristics: • These are simple one-page descriptions that provide the essentials of the position. It is most helpful for asking volunteers to accept a position and in providing them their orientation. Over time, the leader will receive training and grow their skills beyond this simple description. • Instead of focusing on RESPONSIBILITIES, we’re focusing on the OUTPUTS we want to see. These are described in the table below. • Training, meetings, and resources are presented as those things that will help the leader succeed, not as a list of requirements. • They have been left as a Word file so you can modify them for your District or Unit.
    [Show full text]
  • BAE Systems Normal.Dot
    Waterlooville Scout District: Catherington: Clanfield: Cowplain: Denmead: Hambeldon: Hart Plain: Horndean: Purbrook: Waterlooville Issue 19 Waterlooville Scout District News and Views June 2013 WELCOME TO SCOUTING ! So far we have held two ‘Welcome to Scouting Sessions’. The first one had an amazing turnout of 12 newish people attend FIRST RESPONSE ADMINISTRATOR. as well as our District chairman Sue and Paul our Assistant County Commissioner Role – to do all the paperwork and make any for District Support. arrangements to see that Leaders are able to renew or obtain their certificates before they The recent recruits ranged from people who expire. had had an involvement with Scouting in an Hours of work – less than an hour a week unofficial capacity for many years to a (better than being a Leader who does 2 hours couple who were so new they hadn’t even a week) attended a Section meeting. The aim was to give them a brief outline of Scouting, the Rate of Pay – same as for a Leader. Group structure and training and they went away with a copy of the module 1 DVD to get their training underway. There was also Training will be provided. a chance to ask questions and have a chat Applications to the DC. with the people there to help support them Helen from Hambledon Village Group covered the structures sessions and Chris, RECENT AWARDS our Local training Manager, the training Service awards aspects. Ian Stott ADC Scouts 30 years service The sessions have been well received and Ross Sherrington ASL 2nd W’ville 30 years service can be attended by anyone not just Section Neil Storey ASL 1st Horndean 25 years service Leaders but also new members of Group Helene Moutray BSL 2nd W’ville 25 years service Executives who want to understand a bit Suzanne Stephens ASL 1st Hart Plain 10 years service more about what they have let themselves in for! Wood Badges The next Session will be on Saturday 22nd Jennifer Weller ABSL 1st Clanfield June at 1st Hart Plain HQ from 10.30 until about midday.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Meeting of Planning 23Rd April 2015
    Minutes of the Meeting of CHURCH CROOKHAM PARISH COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE Date and Time: Monday 11th January 2016 – 7.30 pm Place: Acorn Hall, Church Crookham Community Centre Present: Councillors: Helen Butler (HB) (Chair), Pat Lowe (PL), Jeremy Silvester (JS), Gill Scott (GS), Andrew Ballington (AB), Annette Whibley (AW), Also present: Jayne Hawkins (Clerk) Hugh Connolly (CCPC) Jenny Radley (HDC) James Radley (HDC) Chris Axam (HDC) Phill Gower (Fleet & Church Crookham Society) There were 5 members of the public present. 01/16 Apologies for Absence Actions Apologies were received from Michael Burford & Gill Butler (HDC) 02/16 To Approve the minutes The minutes of the meeting held on Monday 7th December 2015 were signed as a true record of the meeting. 03/16 Dispensations – to receive any written request for disclosable pecuniary interest dispensations from members. No requests were received. 04/16 Declarations of Interest relating to any item on the agenda No declarations of interest were made. 05/16 Chairman’s Announcements The chairman had no announcements to make. 06/16 Public Session One member of the public made comments on the following planning applications: 15/02897/FUL – 84 Aldershot Road 15/02750/FUL – QEB Refuse Store Councillor Jenny Radley Commented on the following applications: 15/02897/FUL – 84 Aldershot Road 15/02750/FUL – QEB Refuse Store 15/03103/HOU Page: 1 11 01 2016.doc Date: 26/01/2016 Councillor James Radley informed Councillors that the car park behind Ridgeway Parade had been sold and was now closed causing parking problems for residents, customers and business owners. Councillor Radley also encouraged the Parish Council to respond to the Local Development Consultation.
    [Show full text]
  • NOTICE of POLL Notice Is Hereby Given That
    HAMPSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL Election of County Councillor for the YATELEY EAST, BLACKWATER & ANCELLS Division NOTICE OF POLL Notice is hereby given that: 1. A poll will be held on Thursday, 2nd May 2013 between 7am and 10pm. 2. Number of councillors to be elected is ONE. 3. The following people stand nominated: SURNAME OTHER ADDRESS OF DESCRIPTION (if NAMES OF ASSENTERS TO THE NOMINATION NAMES CANDIDATE any) (PROPOSER (P) AND SECONDER (S) LISTED FIRST) Collett Adrian 47 Globe Farm Lane, Liberal Democrat DAVID E SIMPSON(P), DAVID J MURR(S), JOHN W Darby Green, Blackwater, KEANE, GILLIAN E A HENNELL, ROBERT E HARWARD, Hampshire, GU17 0DY STUART G BAILEY, BRIAN F BLEWETT, COLIN IVE, MARGUERITE SIMPSON, ELOISE C ESLAMI Dickens Shawn Meadowcroft, Chequers Conservative Party EDWARD N BROMHEAD(P), STEPHEN A GORYS(S), Lane, Eversley, Hampshire, Candidate JULIET M BOWELL, FREDERICK G BAGGS, RG27 0NY CHRISTOPHER W PHILLIPS-HART, SHANE P M MASON, EMMA MASON, SUSAN H LINDEQUE, COURTNEY-TYLA LINDEQUE, PAMELA M MEDLEY Lawrie Les 106 Kingsway, Blackwater, Labour and Co- PATRICIA D DOWDEN(P), KEITH CARTWRIGHT(S), Hants, GU17 0JD operative Party NICHOLAS C J KAY, HARRY A R HAMBLIN, MAUREEN D Candidate HAMBLIN, CHARLES E LINGS, MICHAEL T STEWART, ISMAIL KESENCI, SYLVIA M RHODES, KENNETH B RHODES Tennison Stanley John 51 Stratfield Road, UKIP KAREN RICHMOND(P), EMMA RICHMOND(S), Basingstoke, RG21 5RS DOUGLAS J ATTWELL, KEITH E SANTON, RALPH D CANNON, BRIAN J BISHOP, ROYSTON F PACKMAN, ANTHONY J F HOCKING, KATHLEEN AUSTIN, STEPHEN M WINTERBURN Situation of
    [Show full text]
  • Three Bedroom Chalet Bungalow to Rent**
    Buena Vista, Ewshot Lane, Ewshot, Farnham, Surrey, GU10 5BP £1,400 pcm + fees **THREE BEDROOM CHALET BUNGALOW TO RENT** Situated in the peaceful village of Ewshot. The property comprises of living room, kitchen and utility, three double Contact Details bedrooms and bathroom. Outside there is parking for two Waterfords Property Services Hampshire Lettings 163 Fleet Road, Fleet, Hampshire. GU51 4PA vehicles. This property comes to the market unfurnished and Tel. 01252 623330 Email. [email protected] Website. waterfords.co.uk available mid-January. IMPORTANT NOTICE These particulars are intended only as general guidance. The Company therefore gives notice that none of the material issued or visual depictions of any kind made on behalf of the Company can be relied upon as accurately describing any of the Specified Matters prescribed by any Order made under the Property Misdescriptions Act 1991. Nor do they constitute a contract, part of a contract or a warranty. Administration fees will apply when renting a property through Waterfords - Surrey Lettings. For more details, please ask a member of staff when you enquire about a property. A refurbished three bed bungalow situated in the peaceful village of Ewshot. The property comprises of living room, kitchen and utility, three double bedrooms and bathroom. Outside there is parking for two vehicles. This property comes to the market unfurnished and available mid January 2019. The property is located in the outskirts of Fleet/Farnham in the small village of Ewshot. There are bus routes into Fleet and Farnham Town Centre where there is an abundance of restaurants, shops and pubs.
    [Show full text]
  • Display PDF in Separate
    BLACKWATER RIVER DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN April 1992 NRA National Rivers Authority Thames Region BLACKWATER RIVER CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSULTATION DRAFT April 1992 FOREWARD The National Rivers Authority was created in 1989 to conserve and enhance the natural water environment. In our role as 'Guardians of the Water Environment' we are committed to preparing a sound and thorough plan for the future management of the region's river catchments. This Draft Catchment Management Plan is a step towards achieving that goal for the Blackwater River catchment. As a vehicle for consultation it will provide a means of seeking a consensus on the way ahead and as a planning document it will be a means of seeking commitment from all parties to realising the environmental potential of the catchment. » '' I ■ ; We look forward to receiving the contributions of those organisations and individuals involved with the river and its catchment. Les Jones Regional General Manager Kings Meadow House Kings Meadow Road Reading Berks RGl 800 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY II Tel: Reading (0734) 535000 II Telex: 849614 NRATHA G Fax: (0734) 500388 121268 Blackwater Rivet DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN A p r i l 1 9 9 2 National Rivers Authority Thames Region King's Meadow House King's Meadow Road Reading BLACKWATER RIVER DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONTENTS LIST Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The National Rivers Authority 1.1 1.2 Catchment Management Planning 1.2 2.0 CATCHMENT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Introduction 2.1 2.2 General Features 2.2 2.3 Topography 2.4 2.4
    [Show full text]
  • Map Referred to in the Hart
    KEY Map referred to in the Hart (Electoral Changes) Order 2012 Scale : 1cm = 0.08500 km Grid interval 1km DISTRICT COUNCIL BOUNDARY Sheet 2 of 2 WARD BOUNDARY PARISH BOUNDARY PARISH WARD BOUNDARY This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of FLEET WEST WARD WARD NAME the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright. FLEET CP PARISH NAME Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. FROGMORE PARISH WARD PARISH WARD NAME The Local Government Boundary Commission for England GD100049926 2012. COINCIDENT BOUNDARIES ARE SHOWN AS THIN COLOURED LINES SUPERIMPOSED OVER WIDER ONES. SHEET 2, MAP 2A Ward boundaries in Yateley town L O Sand and Gravel Pit N G W A T E R R D Playing Field E N A L Golf Course L L I B M 3 0 Playing Field 16 Cricket Ground Y WA L'S HAL E AN S L ER DL AN CH C F O O P X B S 3 L E 2 A 7 N L RNE 6 2 RYE E A WEST F 1 N 0 M M E 3 A I L Y Eversley B L F L L A O Cross N W E E STABL R M E VIEW D O The Yateley Lakes R U E L N S A H L A S NS M D R FO G L E X A L DR Y N D B N E M E A S E V H I A O C N R R R A D S C L F CR Y H O R FT N E LAN A Y E E ' L G W S L A A E L N EVERSLEY RD G R A G R E A S A I A C L F I L E N V I V N D A L H L U IL R R VI M S E T ADIN CA G R OAD RA R G D E E R N D A Yateley L E e Industries V n WEY a T BR Up Green O IDG L Yateley Green E H M L EAD n E OAD e R ING L D e REA r I N G K E B N A St Peter's D 3 L A 0 Church N O 1 R E Yateley 6 A B E K K C Manor School Y D F I L A IR G
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Hart in Hampshire
    Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Hart in Hampshire Report to the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions July 2000 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND This report sets out the Commission’s final recommendations on the electoral arrangements for the district of Hart in Hampshire. Members of the Commission are: Professor Malcolm Grant (Chairman) Professor Michael Clarke CBE (Deputy Chairman) Peter Brokenshire Kru Desai Pamela Gordon Robin Gray Robert Hughes CBE Barbara Stephens Chief Executive © Crown Copyright 2000 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Local Government Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report no: 163 ii LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CONTENTS page LETTER TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE v SUMMARY vii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 CURRENT ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS 3 3 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS 7 4 RESPONSES TO CONSULTATION 9 5 ANALYSIS AND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS 13 6 NEXT STEPS 29 APPENDICES A Final Recommendations for Hart: Detailed Mapping 31 B Draft Recommendations for Hart (January 2000) 37 A large map illustrating the proposed ward boundaries for Fleet and Yateley is inserted inside the back cover of the report. LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND iii iv LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND Local Government Commission for England 25 July 2000 Dear Secretary of State On 20 July 1999 the Commission began a periodic electoral review of Hart under the Local Government Act 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • A Settlement Hierarchy for Hart District
    Local Development Framework Background Paper A Settlement Hierarchy for Hart District January 2010 (updated August 2010) - 2 - Contents 1 Introduction …………………………………………………………... 2 2 The Local Plan Approach ……………………………………………... 3 3 Core Strategy Preferred Options (2006) approach ………………….. 6 4 Policy Context ………………………………... ……………………… 8 5 Profile of Rural Hampshire …………………………………………… 10 6 Analysis of settlements ………………………………………………... 12 7 Formulating a new settlement hierarchy……………………………… 12 Appendices Appendix 1: Breakdown of settlements by population, facilities and services……................. 18 Appendix 2: Map of road and rail network in Hart District ………………………………. 21 Figures Figure 1: Map of the Settlement Boundaries in the Adopted Local Plan (1996-2006) .……. 5 Figure 2: Map of Hampshire County Council Rural and Urban Classification…….................. 11 Figure 3: Map of the Proposed Settlement Hierarchy …………………………….................. 16 - 1 - 1. Introduction 1.1 Following the revocation of the Regional Spatial Strategies by the new Conservative – Liberal Democrat Coalition Government in June 2010 it is considered necessary to update the original Settlement Hierarchy Background Paper (January 2010) in light of the changes. 1.2 Hart District contains a number of towns and villages that vary in size. It is useful for plan-making purposes to group these settlements into a hierarchy based on an understanding of their current size and level of service provision. 1.3 It is important to note that the hierarchy does not in itself amount to a spatial strategy and does not dictate the levels of growth that will go to different settlements. It is a hierarchy based on the settlements as they are now, rather than as they might look in the future. It is merely a framework around which one or more options for a spatial strategy can be articulated.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Capacity Study 2016
    Hart Landscape Capacity Study Main Study and Appendix 1 Hart District Council (2016) Contents Page 1. Executive Summary 1 2. Introduction 8 3. Background to Study 9 4. Objectives 10 5. Approach and Methodology 11 6. Assessment Thresholds 21 7. Study Constraints 25 8. Map of the District: Summary of Results 26 Appendix 1: Local Area Summaries 27 Appendix 2: Local Area Record Sheets 157 Hart District Council Local Plan Landscape Capacity Study 2016 1.0 Executive Summary 1.1 Purpose of the Study This report has been produced to inform the evidence base for the Hart District Council Local Plan. It assesses the relative capacity of the landscape to accommodate development in the rural areas of the District, outside of the established settlement boundaries. The capacity of each area has been awarded by testing the results of each assessment against the following criteria: Low capacity – the landscape area could not accommodate areas of new development without a significant and adverse impact on the landscape character. Occasional, very small scale development may be possible, providing it has regard to the setting and form of existing settlement and the character and the sensitivity of the adjacent character areas. Low/medium capacity – a minimal amount of development could be accommodated only in limited situations, providing it has regard to the setting and form of existing settlement and the character and the sensitivity of the adjacent character areas. Medium capacity – the landscape area could be able to accommodate areas of development in some parts, providing it has regard to the setting and form of existing settlement and the character and the sensitivity of the adjacent character areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Commissioner Service, Our First Hundred Years
    COMMISSIONER SERVICE, OUR FIRST HUNDRED YEARS A research thesis submitted to the College College of Commissioner Science Longhorn Council In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Commissioner Science Degree By Paul N Dreiseszun 2010 INTRODUCTION As we approach the 100th anniversary of Scouting and the Commissioner Service, we need to look back and salute those Scouters that have worn the insignia of the Commissioner. Scouting has changed in those many years. Requirements and uniforms have changed. Council structures and boundaries have been altered. But the role of the Commissioner as Scouting's conduit for unit service remains unchanged. I have been honored to serve as a Unit Commissioner, Assistant District Commissioner, and District Commissioner. My experience is that it can be the most difficult position in Scouting. But it can also be one of the most rewarding jobs in Scouting. As we reach Scouting's centennial, the Commissioner position is getting renewed emphasis and exposure. Funding for non-profits is getting harder to come by resulting in less growth of the professional staffs. The need for more volunteer Commissioners is as great or greater than any time in the past Our role in Scouting will continue to be fundamentally important for the next 100 years. As Commissioners, we must make sure that every unit is offering their boys exactly what is promised to them …, fun, excitement, adventure, and ultimately a quality experience. The Roots of Commissioner Service As Commissioners in the Boy Scouts of America, we are delegated authority and responsibility from the National Council through our "Commission" per the By Laws of the National Council.
    [Show full text]
  • SHL023 Land West of Marsh Lane Eversley
    Hart District Council Local Plan Site Assessment: Stage 2 – High Level Site Assessment – SHL023 – Land West of Marsh Lane, Eversley Cross Confidential Draft - 1.1 – April 2015 High Level Site Assessment Proforma Site Reference SHL023 Site Name Land West of Marsh Lane Parish Eversley Site Address Land West of Marsh Lane, Eversley Cross Capacity Assessment and Categorisation Site Size (ha) 7.44ha Estimated Capacity 134 Comments on capacity The capacity was calculated using a dph figure of 18 (in accordance with gross-to-net ratio of 60%). Housing Strategy Category(s) Strategy 2 (Dispersal strategy) Land Supply Category Category C: Large and ʻlocal strategicʼ sites adjoining existing urban areas Key to Site Assessments: No overriding constraint to development of the site Constraint requiring further detailed assessment Major constraint undermining suitability of site Site Assessment Assessment Criteria Assessment comments Coloured assessment Accessibility to o Bus Stop – (Fox Lane, services: 82, and 83) 0.86km Employment and o Railway Station – (Sandhurst) 4.89km services o Employment Centre – (Blackbushe Business Park) 3.12km o Public Open Space – (Eversley Recreation Ground) 0.86km o Health Facility – (Monteagle Surgery, Yateley) 1.67km o Primary School – (Charles Kingsleyʼs Primary School) 1.8km o Secondary School – (Yateley School) 2.15km o Supermarket – (Waitrose, Yateley) 1.51km Infrastructure • Schools: There is a pressure for places at Primary education level. Although there are no identified deficits in provision capacity at Primary, Junior or Infant Schools within the Eversley/Yateley/Frogmore area they are full or close to full. Additional housing will exacerbate this situation. There are no planned expansions of any of the schools in the area, if there is any significant development that is not forecast will cause increased pressures on the local primary, junior and infant schools.
    [Show full text]