The New York Connecting Railroad

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The New York Connecting Railroad ERA BULLETIN — JULY, 2017 The Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 60, No. 7 July, 2017 The Bulletin STATEN ISLAND’S 157-YEAR-OLD RAILROAD Published by the Electric (Continued from June, 2017 issue) Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box In the previous issue, we described the its rivals, B&O acquired a majority of Staten 3323, New York, New construction of the railroad and its financial Island Rapid Transit Railroad Company’s York 10163-3323. problems. This issue features the North stock in November, 1885. Shore and East Shore extensions and the Construction proceeded rapidly, as shown For general inquiries, or joint operation with the Baltimore & Ohio in the following reports. The soil and rock fill Bulletin submissions, Railroad. for the St. George piers and the North Shore contact us at bulletin@ erausa.org. ERA’s B&O was expanding east in New Jersey, Branch was transported from the excavations website is but had difficulty reaching the most important where large buildings were constructed in www.erausa.org. destination, New York City. To compete with Manhattan. Editorial Staff: February 23, 1886 First train to Elm Park Editor-in-Chief: A month later Extended to Arlington Bernard Linder 1886 Work began on Arthur Kill Bridge to Elizabethport Tri-State News and Commuter Rail Editor: 1888 Completed trestle approach to bridge Ronald Yee Year ending Extended over the bridge across Arthur Kill, connecting with the North American and World June 30, 1890 Baltimore & New York Railroad, a B&O subsidiary, at Elizabethport. News Editor: This was its first connection with the mainland. The company built a Alexander Ivanoff Contributing Editor: second track, 1.3 miles long, from Erastina to the bridge approach Jeffrey Erlitz March 1, 1890 The company began carrying B&O’s freight to St. George. B&O em- ployees handled the freight and the transfer of cars to ships carrying Production Manager: cars over the water from St. George to Manhattan and Brooklyn David Ross Year ending The company built one covered and two open piers, a transfer June 30, 1890 bridge, and a freight yard at the Staten Island terminal. It completed ©2017 Elect ric new ferry buildings and piers at Whitehall Street in Manhattan Railroaders ’ 1887 Constructed second track from Clifton to New Dorp Association, January 1, 1888 Trains started operating to Arrochar Incorporate d 1888 New stations were built at Garretson and New Dorp 1894 Construction of South Beach Branch was completed On July 29, 1899, the Staten Island Rapid South Ferry. In This Issue: Transit Railway Company was incorporated The Arthur Kill Bridge, which was opened in From for the purpose of operating the Staten Island 1890, speeded up freight traffic between New Recognition to Rapid Transit Railroad Company from New Jersey and St. George, but it still had to Dominance— Dorp and South Beach to the center of Arthur cross the harbor on slow boats. At the insist- The New York Kill. Nearly all of the capital stock of this com- ence of civic groups, the State Legislature pany is owned by the Baltimore & Ohio Rail- and Mayor Hylan approved a bill ordering Connecting road. New York City to build a rail tunnel between Railroad In 1905, the City of New York started oper- Brooklyn and Staten Island. The bill was (Continued) ating the Staten Island Ferry. It rebuilt the signed by the Governor of New York State on …Page 2 Whitehall Street docks, ordered five new May 13, 1921. Because the law prohibited boats, and changed the terminal’s name to (Continued on page 16) NEXT TRIP: NYC TRANSIT 207th STREET1 SHOP TOUR — SATURDAY, AUGUST 5 NEW YORKERA DIVISION BULLETIN BULLETIN — JULY, OCTOBER, 2017 2000 FROM RECOGNITION TO DOMINANCE: THE NEW YORK CONNECTING RAILROAD (BRIDGING THE BAY AND CONNECTING THE PIECES) by George Chiasson (Continued from June, 2017 issue) ● Section “D” was also about 2½ miles long, continu- street. That which jointly passed above 3rd (55th) ing south from Grand Avenue in Elmhurst to Street, Jackson Avenue (Northern Boulevard), and “Fremont Junction,” where the New York Connect- Broadway (another new road extension) was actu- ing Railroad merged into the existing Manhattan ally a short but graceful viaduct of concrete- Beach Division of the Long Island Rail Road, near encased steel with trimming that was also subject to the intersection of Central Avenue and Fresh Pond scrutiny from the New York City Arts Commission, Road (now Cypress Hills Street) in Ridgewood. Al- while the final overpass above the intersection of most entirely located in an open cut, this section Anderson (37th) & Woodside Avenues was a true was also graded for four tracks but only received steel-and-concrete railway bridge in the finest tradi- two, with six (6) underpasses (street bridges) locat- tion that slightly encroached on the property of the ed at Grand Avenue (also used by BRT’s Flushing- New York & Queens County Railroad Company. As Ridgewood trolley line), the North Hempstead Plank such it had to provide for passage above that com- Road (later Whitlock, then 57th Avenue), Johnson pany’s trolley barn and office building. (later Caldwell) Avenue, Eliot Avenue, Juniper Aside from the small, nondescript embankment ad- Boulevard & Marion Avenue (69th Place), and Juni- joined to “H” Interlocking at the edge of Sunnyside Yard, per Avenue (69th Street). The portion from Johnson there was no physical sign of the Pennsylvania’s hard- to Marion Avenues was actually cut through a large fought New York Connecting Railroad to be found dur- tract of undeveloped land known as the “Great Juni- ing a Penn Station facilities tour of August 1, 1910, per Swamp” and was done part and parcel with its though its existence and assumed completion was al- overall redevelopment as the western third of the ready well-known and highly anticipated. In point of fact Queens neighborhood of Middle Village, a task the very first steam shovelfuls of earth were already which included the laying of both Eliot Avenue and being moved on Sections C and D by that time, with Juniper Boulevard as completely new arteries. grading begun in July of 1910 for a 5-mile embankment, South of the Juniper Avenue0 underpass, the New cut, and tunnel from the projected site of “Bowery Bay York Connecting Railroad entered a tunnel beneath Junction” southward to the line’s interception point with the Lutheran Cemetery grounds, then re-emerged the Long Island Rail Road’s Montauk Division (ex- onto a rising grade at Metropolitan Avenue (where Southern) main line at Fresh Pond Junction. At the time another BRT trolley line crossed overhead) before that preliminary work in Sunnyside was actually the cre- passing above the LIRR Montauk Division main line ation of a high fill in the nothingness of a swampland (née Southern) on steel truss Bridge #35. It then and nowhere near a railroad, but in the vein of Sunny- crossed above Fremont (65th) Street on an over- side Yard itself numerous properties had been previous- pass before merging with the Manhattan Beach Di- ly procured (as far back as 1904) in anticipation of its vision just north of Fresh Pond Road. Related relo- eventual construction. Several homes were demolished cation and reconstruction work was also performed as the survey burrowed its way south-by-southeast, on the BRT “Lutheran” (Myrtle Avenue) Line and the along a path very similar to that later followed by (and Montauk Division itself as part of the same project. still partly shared with) the Brooklyn-Queens Express- ● Section “E” covered less than one mile, from Bow- way through Woodside and into Elmhurst. Perhaps the ery Bay Junction to Woodside Avenue at the east- most significant “advance” (pre-construction) project ern extreme of the Pennsylvania’s “H” Interlocking associated with the New York Connecting Railroad had and Sunnyside Yard. It consisted of a curving, two- been a relocation of the former Bushwick Railroad (i.e. track embankment that merged into a blind “header” “Lutheran Line”) at Metropolitan Avenue in Middle Vil- wall (bridge abutment) which had been provided lage, where a forecast clash of surveys resulted in the during the Pennsylvania Tunnel & Terminal project. installation a new 500-foot embankment, as well as Included were six (6) railway overpasses of varying movement of the existing terminal approximately 100 origin that were created in conjunction with the feet west of its original (1881) location, all in association city’s never-ending efforts at street grid establish- with its conversion to a BRT rapid transit service as an ment. The three at Jamaica (31st) and Charlotte extension of the Myrtle Avenue Elevated Line in Octo- (32nd) Avenues and 4th (56th) Street were of simple ber, 1906. steel and concrete construction and crossed above By the 1912 construction season, elevation and ex- existing roads; the overpass at 2nd (54th) Street was pansion work had been started on the balance of the similarly built but made way for a completely new (Continued on page 3) 2 ERA BULLETIN — JULY, 2017 From Recognition to Dominance Cemetery at Metropolitan Avenue. Finally, to avoid the installation of a sudden, harsh curve on the south side (Continued from page 2) of Metropolitan Avenue, the Pennsylvania Railroad ulti- Manhattan Beach Division’s trackage from the former mately bore the cost of relocating the Metropolitan Ave- Brooklyn “City Line” (near Cooper Avenue Junction) to nue BRT terminus about 50 feet eastward during the its meeting point with the Montauk Division main line at summer of 1916 in deference to the New York Connect- Fresh Pond Yard, as it was also raised onto a four-track ing Railroad’s projected alignment, which entailed the embankment.
Recommended publications
  • Semiannual Report to Congress Go Green!
    Go Green! Consumes less energy than car or air travel* Semiannual Report to Congress Report #41 H 10/01/09 – 3/31/10 ON THE COVER Amtrak® Empire Builder® Message from the Inspector General am pleased to present the first Semiannual Report We made a series of recommendations to improve to Congress since my appointment as Amtrak the effectiveness and efficiency of training and IInspector General in November 2009. In addition employee development, focusing on developing and to reporting on the Office of Inspector General’s (OIG) implementing a corporate-wide training and employee accomplishments during the six-month period ending development strategy. This would ensure that training March 31, 2010, I am identifying several significant aligns with the overall corporate strategy and provides challenges the OIG faces and the ongoing and planned employees with the skills needed to assume leadership actions we are pursuing to overcome the challenges. roles in the future. Significant Accomplishments Management recently agreed with all of our recommendations and provided a plan to implement During this semi-annual reporting period, the OIG them. It is important, however, for management to continued to identify opportunities to reduce costs, stay focused on making near-term improvements, improve management operations, enhance revenue, and because effective training and development practices institute more efficient and effective business processes. will be a key component of Amtrak’s ability to deliver For example: high quality services. H An OIG audit of the monthly on time performance H The Office of Investigations was instrumental in (OTP) bills and schedules from April 1993 through securing convictions and restitutions in multiple theft April 2004 disclosed that CSX inaccurately billed schemes.
    [Show full text]
  • NYMTC Regional Freight Plan
    3-1 CHAPTER 3: THE THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Photo Source: NYMTC Photo Source: 5. Implementation Guidance 3. Identifying & Assessing Needs 4. Improvements & Solutions 1. Regional Freight Plan Purpose & Desired Freight Outcomes 2. Freight System & Market Overview Regional Freight Plan 2018-2045 Appendix 8 | Regional Freight Plan 2018-2045 Table of Contents 1.0 Regional Freight Plan Purpose and Desired Freight Outcomes ................................................... 1-1 1.1 Plan 2045 Shared Goals and Desired Freight Outcomes ......................................................... 1-2 1.2 Institutional Context ................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Regional Context ....................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Required Federal Performance Measures................................................................................. 1-4 2.0 Freight System and Market Overview .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Freight System Description and Operating Characteristics ....................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Roadway Network ......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.2 Rail Network .................................................................................................................. 2-8 2.1.3 Waterborne Network
    [Show full text]
  • Case Helsinki Airport Expansion: the Benefits of Using Open Infrabim Workflow and Technologies BIM World Munchen 2019 - 26.11.2019
    Case Helsinki Airport Expansion: The Benefits of Using Open InfraBIM Workflow and Technologies BIM World Munchen 2019 - 26.11.2019 Ilkka Tieaho, Infrakit Ltd Jarkko Männistö, Sitowise Ltd Petteri Palviainen, Novatron Ltd Lauri Hartikainen, Pointscene Ltd 4 EXPERTISE • Digital twins and map services • Visualizations and visualization strategies • BIM, GIS, City information models • Information management • Digital engineering • City planning and architecture • Point clouds and photogrammetric models • VR, AR, XR • Interaction and communication PROJECTS • Raide-Jokeri light rail • Grown Bridges tram line JARKKO MÄNNISTÖ • Port of Oulu • Helsinki Airport BIM MANAGER • Science Park, Turku • Travel center, Tampere AURA, SERVICE MANAGER • Tammela District, Tampere • Verkkosaari District, Helsinki ARCHITECT • Central-Pasila, Helsinki SITOWISE 2013 - • Lahti Bypass 5 We are Building a Sustainable and Smart Living Environment. Infrastructure Building Design and Consultancy Design and Consultancy Services Services Our expertise covers the entire Building and infrastructure life cycle Project Smart City Management Services Background ✓ 2003-2004: Ground Investigations and Surveying, Espoo City ✓ 2005-2006: Junior Project Engineer, (Infra projects), Ramboll ✓ 2006-2013: Junior Designer and Designer (Infra), Sitowise ✓ 2013-2016: Development Manager (BIM), Sitowise ✓ 2016-2019: Head Of Development (BIM), Sitowise ✓ 2019: Vice President, BIM Services, Infrakit ✓ +10 years: Responsible for Implementation and development of BIM-workflows in Design and
    [Show full text]
  • 1 of 1 Forecast of Contracts to Be Advertised and Proposals to Be Solicited
    Welcome to the latest MTA "Eye on the Future," in which we present currently funded capital projects that are planned to be advertised from September 2017 through August 2018. The "Eye" is hosted along with other information and resources about the MTA Capital Program in one convenient location. It is part of our commitment to improve business practices and we hope that it is useful to you. The MTA Capital Program is very important for the safety and reliability of the MTA transportation system and is vital for the regional economy. As described in this issue of the "Eye," the MTA is preparing to undertake 145 projects valued at approximately $4.71 billion in capital work. This work spans many areas, including civil, structural, and electrical, as well as new technologies. These projects are crucial for the reliability, growth and resiliency of the system and contribute to the regional economy. This amount of investment is projected to generate approximately $8.29 billion in economic activity for the New York region. We want to make sure you’re aware of our recently-launched web-portal: MyMTA.info. This portal enables suppliers and bidders to the MTA to search procurement opportunities and information across all MTA agencies, respond to sourcing events online, select categories for the goods and services your sell and more. Contractors and suppliers have a critical stake in the success of the Capital Program. We appreciate your interest in and support of the projects included in this issue of the "Eye," and we look forward to your participation.
    [Show full text]
  • Worker Resistance to Company Unions: the Employe Representation Plan of the Pennsylvania Railroad, 1920-1935
    WORKER RESISTANCE TO COMPANY UNIONS: THE EMPLOYE REPRESENTATION PLAN OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD, 1920-1935 Albert Churella Southern Polytechnic State University Panel: Railway Organisations and the Responses of Capitalism and Governments, 1830-1940: A National and Internationally Comparative View William Wallace Atterbury, the PRR Vice-President in Charge of Operation, believed that a golden age of harmony between management and labor had existed prior to the period of federal government control of the railway industry, during and immediately after World War I. Following the Outlaw Strike of 1920, Atterbury attempted to recreate that mythic golden age through the Employe Representation Plan. Workers, however, saw the Employe Representation Plan for the company union that it was, ultimately leading to far more serious labor-management confrontations. Illustration 1 originally appeared in the Machinists’ Monthly Journal 35 (May 1923), 235. Introduction The vicious railway strikes that tore across the United States in 1877 marked the emergence of class conflict in the United States. They also shattered the illusion that the managers and employees of the Pennsylvania Railroad (PRR) shared a common bond of familial loyalty and dedication to their Company. For the next forty years, PRR executives attempted to reestablish that sense of loyalty, harkening back to an imagined pre-industrial past, redolent with harmony and cooperation. As late as 1926, the PRR’s treasurer, Albert J. County, spoke for his fellow executives when he suggested that “the Chief problems of human relations in our time, as affecting the great transportation systems and manufacturing plants, have therefore been to find effective substitutes for that vanished personal contact between management and men, to the end that the old feeling of unity and partnership, which under favorable conditions spontaneously existed when the enterprises were smaller, might be restored.”1 PRR executives attempted to recreate “the old feeling of unity and partnership” with periodic doses of welfare capitalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Right of Passage
    Right of Passage: Reducing Barriers to the Use of Public Transportation in the MTA Region Joshua L. Schank Transportation Planner April 2001 Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee to the MTA 347 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017 (212) 878-7087 · www.pcac.org ã PCAC 2001 Acknowledgements The author wishes to thank the following people: Beverly Dolinsky and Mike Doyle of the PCAC staff, who provided extensive direction, input, and much needed help in researching this paper. They also helped to read and re-read several drafts, helped me to flush out arguments, and contributed in countless other ways to the final product. Stephen Dobrow of the New York City Transit Riders Council for his ideas and editorial assistance. Kate Schmidt, formerly of the PCAC staff, for some preliminary research for this paper. Barbara Spencer of New York City Transit, Christopher Boylan of the MTA, Brian Coons of Metro-North, and Yannis Takos of the Long Island Rail Road for their aid in providing data and information. The Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee and its component Councils–the Metro-North Railroad Commuter Council, the Long Island Rail Road Commuters Council, and the New York City Transit Riders Council–are the legislatively mandated representatives of the ridership of MTA bus, subway, and commuter-rail services. Our 38 volunteer members are regular users of the MTA system and are appointed by the Governor upon the recommendation of County officials and, within New York City, of the Mayor, Public Advocate, and Borough Presidents. For more information on the PCAC and Councils, please visit our website: www.pcac.org.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Aesthetics in Suspension Bridges
    History and Aesthetics in Suspension Bridges 1 6-01 john a roebling_150dpi.jpg Today we trace the evolution of steel bridge design from its first American innovator, JA Roebling up through 1930’s New York In the 30’s in New York, despite hard economic times, many huge structures were erected 2 6-02 empire state building_150dpi.jpg The Empire State Building, tallest in the world About which more later 3 6-03 george washington bridge_150dpi.jpg The GW Bridge, longest suspension span by a factor of two, and 4 6-04 bayonne bridge_150dpi.jpg The Bayonne Bridge, longest arch span in the world, barely surpassing the Sydney Harbor Bridge 5 6-05 othmar ammann_150dpi.jpg These last two were both designed by Othmar H. Ammann, the greatest bridge artist to use steel as his material Ammann was born in Bern, graduated 1902 from ETH and 1904 to USA. Worked from 1912-23 for Lindenthal He would study under Karl Ritter protégé of Carl Cullmann The Swiss were uniquely able to mediate the scientific rigor of the germans with the design elegance of the French 6 6-06 hell gate and triborough bridges_150dpi.jpg The story of Ammann and the GWB begins with Gustav Lindenthal, the dean of American bridge engineers Ammann had cut his teeth as design assistant to Gustav Lindenthal at the Hellgate Bridge The last great bridge of the railroad bridges. From here on the great bridges would carry road traffic rather than trains Here we see two bridges, Hellgate and Triborough, on which Ammann would work, but not express his aesthetic vision 7 6-08 gustav lindenthal_150dpi.jpg Hellgate designer Lindnethal Born in Brunn in Austria, now Brno in the Czech Republic Designed a bridge at Pittsburgh, a lenticular truss to replace Roebling’s Smithfield St.
    [Show full text]
  • Building for Life
    SRV – Building for life Capital Markets Day, SRV Group Plc 23 May 2018 Juha Pekka Ojala, CEO @JpOjala Agenda SRV in brief Megatrends and market overview Strategy and Future SRV Projects 2 SRV IN BRIEF SRV at a glance Selected key figures (MEUR) . Finnish construction company, founded in 1987, publicly listed since 2007 . Both builder and increasingly a real estate developer (more capital Q1/2018 2017 2016 intensive) Revenues 215.7 1,116.1 884.1 . Mostly family/founder-owned, over 50% EBITDA -7.9 22.8 34.3 . Employs about 1,100 people, of which about 1/3 are shareholders Operative Operating -5.1 28.7 26.3 . SRV is responsible for the implementation of approximately 70 profit 1) construction projects and near future development projects in Finland, Operating profit -8.8 17.1 27.7 order backlog in total over EUR 1.5 billion (31.12.2017) Order backlog 2) 1,653.0 1,547.9 1,758.5 . Operates in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area as well as in other attractive Equity ratio % 3) 32.5 35.5 38.3 growth centres in Finland Net debt 355.4 297.6 246.3 . Over 30 years history in operations in Russia and Estonia Balance sheet total 927.7 888.5 882.5 Operations in Finland Housing construction Business 34 % premises construction 66 % Revenue split 2017 1) Operative Operating profit is determined by deducting the calculated exchange difference included in financial items in Russian operations and their potential hedging impacts from operating profit. 2) The number corresponds to the last available day of the period 4 3) Equity ratio = (total equity / (total assets – advances received)) x 100% Operating Regions Russia: Moscow and St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bulletin 2017-06
    ERA BULLETIN — JUNE, 2017 The Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 60, No. 6 June, 2017 The Bulletin STATEN ISLAND’S 157-YEAR-OLD RAILROAD Published by the Electric Staten Island’s trains have been providing quate service with only one locomotive, it Railroaders’ Association, regular service for more than a century, but decided to buy another one. When the trains Incorporated, PO Box most people living in the other boroughs are were running less than a year, it was unable 3323, New York, New York 10163-3323. not aware that the railroad exists. to pay for the locomotives and the creditors The Staten Island Rail Road Company was threatened to seize the property. To protect incorporated on October 18, 1851 to con- the assets, the company declared bankrupt- For general inquiries, or struct a railroad from the easterly shore of cy and Cornelius Vanderbilt’s son, William, Bulletin submissions, contact us at bulletin@ Staten Island between Quarantine and Clif- was appointed receiver. erausa.org. ERA’s ton to a point nearly opposite Amboy, New Meanwhile, the company bought the pri- website is Jersey. Construction began in November, vately-owned ferries, which provided unrelia- www.erausa.org. 1855 and was completed in 1860. This 13- ble service between South Ferry (Manhattan) mile route extended from Townsend’s Dock and Staten Island. Also bought and operated Editorial Staff: Editor-in-Chief: at Vanderbilt’s Landing to Tottenville. An in- until 1948 was the Perth Amboy to South Bernard Linder spection trip from Vanderbilt’s Landing to Ferry route, which was rerouted from Perth Tri-State News and Eltingville was held for officials and stock- Amboy to Tottenville.
    [Show full text]
  • Richmond County (Est
    Richmond County (est. November 1, 1683, original county) Nineteenth Century Post Offices Bay View Established : December 18, 1857 Discontinued : November 11, 1863 Postmaster Date of Appointment Fiscal Postmaster P.O. Dept. Year Compensation Receipts Joseph Feeny 18 December 1857 1859 9.06 5.31 James Kelly 27 July 1858 63.75 2.69 1861 89.82 ----- 1863 376.02 41.34 Bentley, Bentley Manor (see Tottenville) Castleton (1) – Tompkinsville – Staten Island (presidential office from April 18, 1884) Established : April 8, 1815 Name changed to Tompkinsville : April 5, 1825 Name changed to Staten Island : January 8, 1917 Postmaster Date of Appointment Fiscal Postmaster P.O. Dept. Year Compensation Receipts James Guyon 8 April 1815 1816 ----- 1817 ----- 1819 ----- James H. Ward 31 January 1820 1821 8.91 1823 ----- 1825 not in register Tompkinsville Absalon G. Dixon 5 April 1825 1827 44 76 John E. Thompson 8 March 1828 1829 62.40 Robert M. Hazard 29 June 1830 1831 53.89 1833 77.13 John C. Thompson 6 November 1833 1835 79.52 1837 not in register Edward Thompson 10 October 1836 142.80 1839 123.88 1841 152.14 334.11 1843 307.21 677.21 1845 144.57 308.38 1847 137.24 208.29 1849 171.62 231.10 Francis S. Jones 20 July 1849 Henry S. Lockman 14 March 1850 1851 214.19 314.48 1853 188.29 232.10 Peter H. Wandell 26 May 1853 20.84 18.22 1855 271.77 122.02 1857 239.61 1.98 1859 192.63 129.03 1861 193.02 63.72 Jacob B.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transit in NY, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority: Its Future and History Carrigy
    Hofstra University, Department of Global Studies & Geography, Honors Essay Public Transit in New York The Past and Future of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority Michael Carrigy Fall 2010 Supervised by Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue Table of Contents Introduction: Public Transportation in the United States 3 New York’s MTA and Its Subsidiaries 7 MTA’s Departmental Structure 11 The MTA’s Report Card 19 Planning for the Future 26 Appendix 30 Bibliography 51 2 Introduction: Public Transportation in the United States The Rise of the Suburb and the Decline of the Inner City From the 1950s to the 1970s, race riots, deindustrialization, the rise of consumerism, and the rise of the automobile contributed to the decline of America’s cities and the rise of the suburbs. For instance, downtown Hempstead lost its major department store and saw a decline in population and a rise in crime. Nearby in Levittown, houses were mass produced for market consumption at a time when demand for detached suburban style houses skyrocketed. The pressure for housing not only came from a housing shortage for returning veterans but from FHA policies which subsidized mortgages for new houses. The policy made it significantly cheaper in some cases to buy a new home than to either rent an apartment or refurbish an existing home. To serve these low density areas, malls, just like the Roosevelt Field Mall in Garden City, were erected in suburban places across the country. Roosevelt Field gladly made up for Hempstead’s diminishing retailing in its downtown. Due to an increase in the number of malls, many cities saw areas just outside of their downtown decline into severe and in some cases complete abandonment.
    [Show full text]
  • Fifty-Second Annual Report
    1933 FIFTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT THE LONG ISLAND RAILROAD • COMPANY FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31st DECEMBER, 1933 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY, BROAD STREET STATION BUILDING, PHILADELPHIA, PA. Downloaded from http://PRR.Railfan.net - Collection of Rob Schoenberg - ©2019 - Commercial reproduction or distribution prohibited THE LONG ISLAND RAILROAD COMPANY DIRECTORS W. W. ATTERBURY............................. Broad Street Station Building, Philadelphia, Pa. HERBERT C. LAKIN............................ 14 Wall Street, New York, N. Y. A. J. COUNTY................................... Broad Street Station Building, Philadelphia, Pa. W. E. FREW... , ................................. 13 William Street, New York, N. Y. HERBERT L. PRATT.... · ........................ 26 Broadway, New York, N. Y. H. R. WINTHROP................................ 26 Broadway, New York, N. Y. G. LEBOUTILLIER. .............................. Pennsylvania Station, New York, N. Y. ALFRED H. SWAYNE............................ 1775 Broadway, New York, N. Y. JOHN A. HARTFORD........................... .420 Lexington Avenue, New York, N. Y. T. W. HULME ................................... Broad Street Station Building, Philadelphia, Pa. M. W. CLEMENT................................ Broad Street Station Building; Philadelphia, Pa. DAVID L. LUKE ................................ 230 Park Avenue, New York, N. Y. CARLETON H. PALMER ........................ 745 Fifth Avenue, New York, N. Y. FLOYD L. CARLISLE ............................ 15 Broad Street, New York, N. Y. J. L. EYSMANS ................................
    [Show full text]