DOCSLIB.ORG

SCP Operations Handbook Version: 2021.2 (April 2021)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SCP Operations Handbook Version: 2021.2 (April 2021) Title: SCP Operational Handbook Date issued: April 2021 Date posted: April 9, 2021 Unique identifier: SC 001 Topic: Effective practices for SCP grants management. Summary: This document provides ideas and suggestions for effective practices in operating and managing many aspects of SCP grants. SCP Operations Handbook Version: 2021.2 (April 2021) This page left intentionally blank. AmeriCorps Seniors Senior Companion Program Operations Handbook: Change Log CHANGE LOG This table lists all changes made in the most recent revision of this document. See Appendix E.4 for a full list of changes since January 2017. Edits made in Version 2021.2 (April 2021) Change Chapter and Page Change Number Number 1 This change is not • Update links throughout document. AmeriCorps and related to a specific AmeriCorps Seniors resources are in the process of being chapter. transferred from NationalService.gov to AmeriCorps.gov. As documents and pages are transitioned, this document is updated. 2 Chapter 1: • AmeriCorps Seniors Week will not be held in 2021, AmeriCorps AmeriCorps Seniors will highlight AmeriCorps Seniors Overview (PG 13) Program during the month of May, Older Americans Month. 3 Chapter 5: Project • AmeriCorps has published a new National Service Criminal Staff (PG 38) History Check (NSCHC) regulation that will be effective May 1, 2021. Updates and additional resources provided 4 Chapter 7: • Provided link to updated AmeriCorps Seniors Pandemic AmeriCorps Seniors Recovery a Pathway to Service (updated March 2021) SCP Volunteer Assessments (51) 5 Chapter 7: • Update language in teleservice to state approval from your AmeriCorps Seniors portfolio manager SCP Volunteer Assessments (PG 52) 6 Chapter 8: • AmeriCorps has published a new National Service Criminal Volunteers in History Check (NSCHC) regulation that will be effective May AmeriCorps Seniors 1, 2021. Updates and additional resources provided SCP (PG 67) • Effective May 1, all three checks must be conducted, reviewed, and an eligibility determination made by the grant recipient or subrecipient before a person begins to work or serve on an NSCHC-required grant. 7 Chapter 11.3 Project • Office of Monitoring provides additional information on Compliance Monitoring Activities Types and Monitoring Results and Monitoring (PG 115) Corrective Actions plans Version 2021.2 i AmeriCorps Seniors Senior Companion Program Operations Handbook: Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS CHANGE LOG ............................................................................................................................................................. I TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................................. II PREFACE .................................................................................................................................................................. IV 1 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 PURPOSE OF HANDBOOK ......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 HANDBOOK DESIGN ................................................................................................................................................. 5 1.3 AMERICORPS OVERVIEW .......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.4 RESOURCES OF AMERICORPS ................................................................................................................................... 9 2 PROJECT OPERATIONS ...................................................................................................................................... 18 2.1 ELIGIBILITY, AWARDS, AND SPONSORSHIP ............................................................................................................. 18 2.2 SPONSOR RESPONSIBILITIES ................................................................................................................................... 18 2.3 SPECIAL LIMITATIONS INCLUDING PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES ................................................................................... 22 2.4 EFFECTIVE PRACTICES IN PROJECT OPERATIONS ................................................................................................................. 26 3 PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT AND EVIDENCE-BASED PROGRAMMING .......................................................... 27 3.1 AMERICORPS PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT INITIATIVE .................................................................................... 27 3.2 EVIDENCE BASED PROGRAMMING ......................................................................................................................... 30 4 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION ........................................................................................................................... 33 4.1 LOCAL OWNERSHIP ................................................................................................................................................ 33 4.2 AMERICORPS SENIORS SCP ADVISORY COUNCIL .......................................................................................................... 33 5 PROJECT STAFF ................................................................................................................................................. 36 5.1 GENERAL PROVISIONS ............................................................................................................................................ 36 5.2 STRUCTURE ............................................................................................................................................................ 36 5.3 PERSONNEL POLICIES FOR PROJECT STAFF ............................................................................................................. 37 5.4 PROJECT STAFF ROLES ............................................................................................................................................ 39 5.5 EFFECTIVE PRACTICES FOR BUILDING PROJECT STAFF .......................................................................................................... 41 6 VOLUNTEER STATIONS ...................................................................................................................................... 43 6.1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................... 43 6.2 VOLUNTEER STATION ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ............................................................................................. 45 6.3 PREPARATION OF THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING .............................................................................. 47 6.4 EFFECTIVE PRACTICES FOR MANAGING VOLUNTEER STATIONS ............................................................................................. 49 7 AMERICORPS SENIORS SCP VOLUNTEER ASSIGNMENTS ..................................................................................... 51 7.1 CRITERIA FOR VOLUNTEER ASSIGNMENTS ............................................................................................................. 51 7.2 SELECTION OF ASSIGNMENTS ......................................................................................................................................... 52 7.3 ASSIGNMENT OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................................. 54 7.4 AMERICORPS SENIORS SCP LEADERS .............................................................................................................................. 54 7.5 TERMINATION OF ASSIGNMENTS ........................................................................................................................... 56 7.6 EFFECTIVE PRACTICES IN AMERICORPS SENIORS VOLUNTEER ASSIGNMENTS ........................................................................... 56 Version 2021.2 ii AmeriCorps Seniors Senior Companion Program Operations Handbook: Table of Contents 8 VOLUNTEERS IN AMERICORPS SENIORS SCP ...................................................................................................... 58 8.1 ELIGIBILITY TO BE ENROLLED .................................................................................................................................. 58 8.2 RECRUITMENT OF AMERICOPRS SENIORS VOLUNTEERS ........................................................................................ 59 8.3 SELECTION OF AMERICOPRS SENIORS VOLUNTEERS .............................................................................................. 63 8.4 SELECTION OF VOLUNTEERS IN AMERICORPS SENIORS SCP ................................................................................... 66 8.5 ENROLLMENT OF VOLUNTEERS IN AMERICORPS SENIORS SCP .............................................................................. 67 8.6 ORIENTATION AND TRAINING OF AMERICOPRS SENIORS VOLUNTEERS ................................................................ 68 8.7 SERVICE REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................................................................................ 75 8.8 EFFECTIVE PRACTICES IN MANAGING
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Monroe County
    MONROE COUNTY REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS [RFP] Caregiver Resource Center Release Date: January 27, 2017 Response Deadline: February 24, 2017 Monroe County Office for the Aging Monroe Community Hospital 435 E. Henrietta Road Faith Wing, Suite 3 Rochester, NY 14620 monroecounty.gov NO RESPONSE FORM If you choose not to respond to this Request for Proposals, please fax this form back to MONROE COUNTY at your earliest convenience, to the attention of: Kim Boedicker Monroe County Office of Purchasing & Central Services 200 County Office Building Rochester, NY 14614 Fax (585) 753-1104 RFP Caregiver Resource Center Company: Address: Contact: Contact Phone: Email: Reason for No-Response: Project capacity. Cannot bid competitively. Cannot meet delivery requirements. Cannot meet specifications. Do not want to do business with Monroe County. *Other: Suggested changes to RFP Specifications for next Request for Proposals. *Other reasons for not responding might include insufficient time to respond, do not offer product or service, specifications too stringent, scope of work too small or large, unable to meet insurance requirements, cannot meet delivery or schedule requirements, etc. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 – Invitation to Participate…………………………………………………………....…… 4 Purpose RFP Coordinator; Issuing Office Presentation and Clarification of the County's Intentions Time Line Section 2 – Scope of Work……………………………………………………………………..….….... 6 Overview Definitions Detailed Scope of Work Additional Information Section 3 – Specific Proposal Requirements…………………………………………….………..10
    [Show full text]
  • Jomary Vieira, Secretary Resolution
    Memorandum Department of Senior Programs and Services 42250 DATE: September 9, 2014 TO: Board of Acquisition & Contract FROM: Mae Carpenter, Commissioner Department of Senior Programs and Services RE: Request for authority to: a. Amend an Inter-Municipal Agreement (“IMA”) with the City of Yonkers (the “Contractor”) to exercise the first of five (5) options to renew the IMA pursuant to which the Contractor will provide Information and Assistance Services for the elderly in accordance with the Community Services for the Elderly Act Program up to an amount not-to-exceed $55,575.00, for the program period April 1, 2014 through March 31, 2015. b. Amend the IMAs with the Contractor to add certain provisions required by New York State Office for the Aging (“NYSOFA”) concerning equal access to services, non-discrimination and concentration of services on target populations By resolution approved on August 22, 2013 (the “August 22nd Resolution”) your Honorable Board authorized the County of Westchester (the “County”), acting by and through its Department of Senior Programs and Services (the “Department”), to enter into an Inter- Municipal Agreement (the “IMA”) with the City of Yonkers (the “Contractor”) pursuant to which the Contractor would provide Information and Assistance Services to Westchester County APPROVEDelderly residents BOARD OF60 ACQUISITIONyears and older & CONTRACT in accordance - 10/09/2014 with the -Community JOMARY VIEIRA, Services SECRETARY for the Elderly Act (the “Program”), for an amount not to exceed $55,575.00 to be paid based on an agreed- upon unit-cost for actual services provided and data-entered in the Social Assistance Management System “SAMS” , with the Contractor contributing up to $23,818.00 in matching funds to the Program depending on the number of units of services provided, for the program period April 1, 2013 through March 31, 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Dignity in Aging Act of 2019 (H.R
    INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH POLICY AND LEADERSHIP February 2020 Policy At A Glance: Dignity in Aging Act of 2019 (H.R. 4334) Dignity in Aging Act of 2019 reauthorizes the Older Americans Act which funds a wide range of programs to help individuals 60 years and over age independently and with dignity. What is the Dignity in History 1/4/1965 President Lyndon B. Aging Act of 2019? Johnson (LBJ) unveils his Great Society The Dignity in Aging Act of 2019 reauthorizes the provisions Initiative under the Older Americans Act (OAA) of 1965 until fiscal year (FY) 2024. Services and programs under consideration include1: 7/14/1965 LBJ signs the Older Americans Act (OAA) • Support services for caregivers of the elderly of 1965 into law • Informational services such as pension counseling • Nutritional services such as home-delivered and 4/19/2016 President Obama signs the OAA congregate meals Reauthorization Act of • Disease prevention and health promotion services 2016 into law • Community and workforce training regarding elder care • Elder abuse and neglect prevention services 9/30/2019 The 2016 OAA Reauthorization Act The bill also establishes several entities and programs to expires 1 promote independent living and reduce social isolation. OAA 10/28/2019 House of services must target “older individuals with greatest economic Representatives passes need and older individuals with greatest social need, with the Dignity in Aging particular attention to low-income minority individuals, older Act of 2019 (H.R. 4334) individuals residing in rural areas, low-income individuals, and frail individuals.”2 Bringing wholeness to individuals and communities, the Institute for Health Policy and Leadership (IHPL) strives to integrate health policy research and education with leadership development.
    [Show full text]
  • Division of Aging and Adult Services Part 2 Chapter 1
    Title 18: Human Services Part 2: Division of Aging and Adult Services Part 2 Chapter 1: State Plan on Aging MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES Division of Aging and Adult Services Older Americans Act of 1965, as amended State Plan on Aging TABLE OF CONTENTS I. DESIGNATION OF THE STATE UNIT ON AGING ............................................ 3 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................... 4 III. NARRATIVE ............................................................................................................... 5 A. DIVISION OF AGING AND ADULT SERVICES ............................................. 5 B. AREA AGENCIES ON AGING ............................................................................ 8 C. AREA AGENCIES ON AGING – AREA PLAN ................................................. 8 D. AREA AGENCY ON AGING ADVISORY COUNCILS ................................. 10 E. AGING SERVICE PROVIDERS ........................................................................ 11 IV. OLDER AMERICAN ACT (OAA) CORE PROGRAMS ..................................... 13 V. AOA DISCRETIONARY GRANTS ........................................................................ 14 VI. CONSUMER CONTROL AND CHOICE .............................................................. 15 VII. FUTURE DIRECTIONS ........................................................................................... 16 VIII. STATEWIDE NEEDS ASSESSMENT ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SENATE-Friday, May 21, 1993
    10748 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE May 21, 1993 SENATE-Friday, May 21, 1993 (Legislative day of Monday, April 19, 1993) The Senate met at 10 a.m., on the ex- Mr. ROBB thereupon assumed the FE! includes such things as the im­ piration of the recess, and was called to chair as Acting President pro tempore. puted rental value of the family home; order by the Honorable CHARLES S. life insurance; the Social Security ROBB, a Senator from the State of Vir- checks of a live-in parent; tax-exempt ginia. RESERVATION OF LEADER TIME interest; most Government transfer The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem­ payments; IRA's; deductible retirement PRAYER pore. Under the previous order, the contributions; and health insurance, to The Chaplain, the Reverend Richard leadership time is reserved. name a few. C. Halverson, D.D., offered the follow­ What FE! really is, however, is a dis­ ing prayer: MORNING BUSINESS tortion of what a taxpayer's actual in­ Let us pray: come is. The taxpayers cannot under­ In a moment of silence, let us re­ The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem­ stand it. member Noel Coffey, one of our floor pore. Under the previous order, there That is, they cannot understand fam­ men, who is undergoing a third bypass will now be a period for the transaction ily economic income. They do under­ today. of morning business for not to extend stand adjusted gross income. * * * they that wait upon the Lord beyond the hour of 10:20 a.m. I challenge the Treasury to try and shall renew their strength; they shall The Senator from Iowa [Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Lyndon B. Johnson - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia 5/16/2014
    Lyndon B. Johnson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 5/16/2014 Create account Log in Article Talk Read View source View history Search Our Privacy Policy is changing on 6 June 2014. To learn more, click here. Main page Contents Lyndon B. Johnson Featured content From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Current events (Redirected from Lbj) Random article Donate to Wikipedia "LBJ" redirects here. For other uses, see LBJ (disambiguation). Wikimedia Shop Lyndon Baines Johnson (/ l ndən be nz dʒ nsən/; August 27, 1908 – Lyndon B. Johnson Interaction January 22, 1973), often referred to as LBJ, was the 36th President of Help the United States (1963–1969), a position he assumed after his service About Wikipedia as the 37th Vice President of the United States (1961–1963). He is one Community portal of only four people[1] who served in all four elected federal offices of the Recent changes [2] Contact page United States: Representative, Senator, Vice President, and President. Johnson, a Democrat from Texas, served as a United States Tools Representative from 1937 to 1949 and as a Senator from 1949 to 1961, What links here Related changes including six years as United States Senate Majority Leader, two as Upload file Senate Minority Leader and two as Senate Majority Whip. After Special pages campaigning unsuccessfully for the Democratic nomination in 1960, Permanent link Johnson was asked by John F. Kennedy to be his running mate for the Page information 1960 presidential election. After their election, Johnson succeeded to Data item the presidency following President Kennedy's assassination on Cite this page November 22, 1963, completed Kennedy's term and was elected Print/export President in his own right, winning by a large margin over Barry 36th President of the United States Create a book Goldwater in the 1964 election.
    [Show full text]
  • The Older Americans Act and Its Application to Native Americans
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 276 550 RC 016 002 TITLE The Older Americans Act and Its Application to Native Americans. Rearing before the Special COmmittee on Aging. United States Senate, Ninety-Ninth Congress, Second Session (Oklahoma City, OK, June 28, 1986). INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washirgton, D.C. Senate Special Committee on Aging. REPORT NO Senate-Brg-99-827 PUB DATE ES NOTE 214p.; Serial No. 99-22. Document contains small, light, broken type. AVAILABLE FROMSuperintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Offide: U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. PUB TYPE Legal/Legislative/Regulatory Materials (090) EDRS PRICE MF01 Plus Postage. PC Not Available frem EDRS. DESCRIPTORS *American Indians; *Delivery Systems; Federal Indian Relat:onship; *Federal Programs; Financial Support; *Health Programs; Bearings; Human Services; Lunch Programs; Needs; *Needs Assessment; Nutrition Instruction; *Older Adults IDENTIFIERS Congress 99th; *Older Americans Act 1965 Title VI ABSTRACT Three panels appeqring before the Senate Special Committee on Aging discuss t1 .p. sensitivity of the Administrationon Aging to Native Americans, coordination of services between TitleII and Title VI of the_Older Americans Act, and availability of services under the_act. Witnesses recommend language be included in the reauthorization of the Older Americans Act to fund TitleVI at a level of $12.5 million for fiscalyear 1987!,117.5 million_fOr fiscal year 1988; and $20 million for fiscal year 1989. Experts reporton analysis of computer data from a needs assessment_of 813_older Indians in the United States and trends_ofa_survey focusing on decreasing funding_levels of Title VI grantees and how thisimpacts the targeting_of service to older Indians whoare already unserved and underserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 106Th CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 106th CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 146 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, OCTOBER 26, 2000 No. 136 House of Representatives The House met at 10 a.m. and was sures of compromise, when we feel par- THE JOURNAL called to order by the Speaker pro tem- alyzed by the tensions outside our- The SPEAKER pro tempore. The pore (Mr. QUINN). selves or confounded by the gaping Chair has examined the Journal of the f holes of darkness within, You have told last day's proceedings and announces DESIGNATION OF THE SPEAKER us ``Be sober and watchful,'' sharp, and to the House his approval thereof. PRO TEMPORE on alert. Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Jour- The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- Your holy scriptures have said to us: nal stands approved. fore the House the following commu- ``Your enemy the devil, like a roaring Mr. MCNULTY. Mr. Speaker, pursu- nication from the Speaker: lion, is seeking someone to devour. Re- ant to clause 1, rule I, I demand a vote WASHINGTON, DC, sist him, strong in faith, knowing that on agreeing to the Speaker pro October 26, 2000. your fellow believers throughout the tempore's approval of the Journal. I hereby appoint the Honorable JACK QUINN world undergo the same thing you suf- The SPEAKER pro tempore. The to act as Speaker pro tempore on this day. fer.'' question is on the Chair's approval of J. DENNIS HASTERT, the Journal. Speaker of the House of Representatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Senior Poverty and Hunger: the Role of the Older Americans Act
    S. HRG. 113–791 REDUCING SENIOR POVERTY AND HUNGER: THE ROLE OF THE OLDER AMERICANS ACT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON PRIMARY HEALTH AND AGING OF THE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH, EDUCATION, LABOR, AND PENSIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON EXAMINING REDUCING SENIOR POVERTY AND HUNGER, INCLUDING S. 1028, TO REAUTHORIZE AND IMPROVE THE OLDER AMERICANS ACT OF 1965 JUNE 19, 2013 Printed for the use of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 99–847 PDF WASHINGTON : 2016 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 15:58 May 05, 2016 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\DOCS\99847.TXT DENISE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH, EDUCATION, LABOR, AND PENSIONS TOM HARKIN, Iowa, Chairman BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland LAMAR ALEXANDER, Tennessee PATTY MURRAY, Washington MICHAEL B. ENZI, Wyoming BERNARD SANDERS (I), Vermont RICHARD BURR, North Carolina ROBERT P. CASEY, JR., Pennsylvania JOHNNY ISAKSON, Georgia KAY R. HAGAN, North Carolina RAND PAUL, Kentucky AL FRANKEN, Minnesota ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah MICHAEL F. BENNET, Colorado PAT ROBERTS, Kansas SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, Rhode Island LISA MURKOWSKI, Alaska TAMMY BALDWIN, Wisconsin MARK KIRK, Illinois CHRISTOPHER S. MURPHY, Connecticut TIM SCOTT, South Carolina ELIZABETH WARREN, Massachusetts PAMELA SMITH, Staff Director LAUREN MCFERRAN, Deputy Staff Director and Chief Counsel DAVID P.
    [Show full text]
  • AUSTIN, TX This Report Covers the Time Period November 1, 2005 to October 31, 2007 (Except Where Otherwise Specifically Noted)
    KTBC- AUSTIN, TX This report covers the time period November 1, 2005 to October 31, 2007 (except where otherwise specifically noted). I. PROGRAMMING: a. Local Newscasts: KTBC airs 35.5 hrs of local newscasts every week, as follows: Monday – Friday: 5 a.m. – 9 a.m. Monday – Friday: 12noon -12:30 p.m. Monday – Friday: 5 p.m. – 6 p.m. Monday –Sunday: 9 p.m.- 10 p.m. Saturday: 6 p.m. – 6:30 p.m. Sunday: 5 p.m. – 5:30 p.m. b. Breaking News: KTBC broke into and/or preempted regularly scheduled programming in order to bring its viewers breaking news or disaster information. This coverage included reporting on severe weather warnings, amber alerts, school closings, and other emergencies. c. Important Local Stories: Examples of local issues covered include: Child Safety: • The Texas Public Interest Research Group (TEXPIRG) officials showed toys they consider too dangerous for kids to play with • Health officials from across the state are in Austin, to prepare for a possible flu pandemic Crime Prevention: • A problem with Austin drivers leaving the car engines on as they run errands has led to an Austin Police initiative, “Operation Don’t Give Your Car Away” • Launch of a Texas Department of Public Safety website, familywatchdog.us, a registry of sex offenders • Austin’s newest newspaper, The Fugitive Post, is published by a local private investigator, with catching fugitives as its primary purpose Community and Health: • The opening of a new Austin clinic for the needy, particularly African-Americans, staffed by African-Americans, paying particular attention to diseases that plague their community • A potential public crisis due to overflowing health facilities in Austin for the mentally impaired.
    [Show full text]
  • Senior Corps Timeline
    Event Key: Blue = Conferences or Meetings (CoMs) Senior Corps Timeline Purple = Legislation (L) Red = Senior Corps Programmatic Events Click on any of the decades or events below to (SCPEs) navigate to that event in the timeline. Green = Evaluations (Es) 1950s • 1950: President Truman initiates the First National Conference on Aging (CoMs) • 1961: First White House Conference on Aging under President Eisenhower (CoMs) 1960s • 1963: National Service Corps proposed by President Kennedy but defeated in Congress (L) • 1964: Johnson declares War on Poverty and creates Office of Economic Opportunity (L) • 1965: Older Americans Act creates the Administration on Aging (AoA) (L) • 1965: Foster Grandparent Program demonstration projects begin (SCPEs) • 1965: Senior Community Service Employment Program (SCSEP) begins (L) • 1965: Green Thumb program (L) • 1966: Greenleigh Associates conducts the first FGP evaluation (Es) • 1968: “Senior Friends” demonstration project (L) • 1968-1973: Rosalyn Saltz conducts a series of longitudinal FGP evaluations (Es) • 1969: Older Americans Volunteer Program (OAVP) created authorizing FGP and RSVP .(L) • 1970s 1970s: FGP expands services beyond institutional settings (SCPEs) • 1970: Gray and Kasteler FGP evaluation (Es) • 1971: ACTION agency created (L) • 1971: Retired Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP) projects begin (SCPEs) • 1971: Second White House Conference on Aging under President Nixon (CoMs) • 1971: National Association of FGP Directors (NAFGPD) founded (SCPEs) • 1972: Congress dramatically increases funding
    [Show full text]
  • Division of Medicaid & Long-Term Care State Unit on Aging FFY 2016
    Division of Medicaid & Long-Term Care State Unit on Aging FFY 2016 - 2019 Plan for Aging Services “To promote the dignity, independence and Freedom of choice for older Nebraskans” Contents Verification of Intent ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Context .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Development of the State Plan ................................................................................................................. 7 Critical Issues and Future Implications ..................................................................................................... 8 Consumer directed alternatives ............................................................................................................... 8 VISTA - Nebraska Strengthening Aging Populations (NSAP) ..................................................................... 9 Elder Justice / Elder Rights Program ......................................................................................................... 9 Aging Services ......................................................................................................................................... 10 Focus Areas ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]