DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

INTRODUCTION The three works published in the present volume—the Likewise, hardly anything is known about the impe- Concerto in C Minor, Wq 31, the Concerto in G Minor, tus for the creation or the circumstances of performance Wq 32, and the Concerto in F Major, Wq 33—date from of the keyboard concertos. Apparently Bach most often the years 1753 to 1755 in Berlin, and thus belong to the played his concertos in the context of private soirees in the middle period of Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach. In the estate circle of his musician colleagues and friends. In his autobi- catalogue (NV 1790, p. 32), the following entries are found: ography Johann Wilhelm Hertel reports on Bach’s perfor- mance of the Concerto in D Major, Wq 11 at Franz Benda’s No. 32. C. moll. B. 1753. Clavier, 2 Violinen, Bratsche und Baß. house in October 1745.4 Whether the oft-cited note of No. 33. G. moll. B. 1754. Clavier, 2 Flöten, 2 Violinen, Bratsche und Baß. Frederick II on Bach’s request for a pay raise from the year No. 34. F. dur. B. 1755. Clavier, 2 Violinen, Bratsche und Baß. 1755 refers to a solo appearance involving a concerto for keyboard and orchestra at the court, cannot be resolved Within Bach’s concerto production these works rep- beyond a doubt.5 Possibly it has some connection with an resent, together with Wq 34 (published in CPEB:CW, appearance at the Berlin palace on 28 October 1753, which III/9.11), the conclusion of a particularly creative phase. is alluded to in contemporary daily newspapers.6 Perhaps At the beginning of his time in Berlin Bach wrote at least the fact that three of the five original dates in Bach’s con- one concerto for solo keyboard and string accompaniment certo autograph manuscripts mention the months of April each year,1 and in this manner began to explore the young and May suggests a yearly recurring event for which Bach genre and further develop it in its artistic possibilities. In furnished a new concerto.7 The 6 May birthday of Bach’s the ensuing period only a few other works can be identi- close friend, the Berlin doctor and music lover Georg Ernst fied that seem like added contributions to the series. In Stahl (1713–72), could be a conceivable occasion. the second half of the 1750s Bach’s artistic interest seems As the original sources for Wq 31 and 32 make plain, to have shifted from the concerto to the symphony, after Bach performed these works at least once at the beginning which he turned his attention to the sonatina for obbligato of his time in Hamburg. This presumably occurred in the cembalo and orchestra (a genre developed by him), before context of the public concerts he organized. The Hamburg he returned to writing concertos. newspapers mention several times that Bach performed his Whether there were biographical reasons for this shift in emphasis is unknown. In any event, for the years 173; Claus Oefner, Die Musikerfamilie Bach in Eisenach (Eisenach: Bach- from 1753 to 1755, applications to city representatives in haus, 1996), 78–81; CPEB-Briefe, 1:40–41; Musik am Rudolstädter Hof. Zittau (1753) and Leipzig (1755) are documented,2 as well Die Entwicklung der Hofkapelle vom 17. Jahrhundert bis zum Beginn des 20. Jahrhunderts, ed. Ute Omonsky (Rudolstadt: Thüringer Landesmu- as a trip undertaken in 1754, which apparently involved the seum Heidecksburg, 1997), 209; and Ernst Wilhelm Wolf, Auch eine exploration of employment possibilities at the courts in Reise aber nur eine kleine musikalische in den Monaten Junius, Julius und Rudolstadt, Eisenach, Gotha, and Kassel.3 August 1782 zum Vergnügen angestellt (Weimar, 1784), 42–43. 4. Hertel, Autobiographie, ed. Erich Schenk (Graz and Cologne: 1. Only in the year 1752 is there no concerto listed in NV 1790; there Böhlhaus, 1957), 24; cited in CPEB:CW, III/6, xxii. are three works listed for 1753. The gap could be due to Bach’s work on 5. “Er hat ein mahl im Concert hier gespielet nuhn krigt er Spiritus.” Versuch I, published in 1753. (He once played in a concert here, and now he’s getting cocky.) Quoted 2. See CPEB-Briefe, 1:13–39; Arnold Schering, Musikgeschichte Leip- in Hans-Günter Ottenberg, Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach (Leipzig: zigs, vol. 3, Das Zeitalter Johann Sebastian Bachs und Johann Adam Reclam, 1982), 83; Ottenberg, 57. Hillers von 1723–1800 (Leipzig: F. Kistner & C. F. W. Siegel, 1941), 343; 6. See Manuel Bärwald, “ ‘... ein Clavier von besonderer Erfindung’: and Ulrike Kollmar, Gottlob Harrer (1703–1755), Kapellmeister des Gra- Der Bogenflügel von Johann Hohlfeld und seine Bedeutung für das fen Heinrich von Brühl am sächsisch-polnischen Hof und Thomaskantor in Schaffen Carl Philipp Emanuel Bachs,”BJ (2008): 271–300. Leipzig. Mit einem Werkverzeichnis und einem Katalog der Notenbiblio- 7. Wq 17: “d. 5 Apr. 1745”; Wq 23: “Potsd. Mens. Majo [1748]”; Wq 33: thek Harrers (Beeskow: Ortus, 2006), 339–40. “Pots. [17]55 Mens. Majo.” The other two only have years: Wq 46: 3. See Percy M. Young, The Bachs, 1500–1850 (London: Dent, 1970), “1740”; and Wq 8: “1741.” [ xi ] table 1. c.p.e. bach’s concert performances in hamburg Date Place Program Description Wiermann Document 28 April 1768 Drillhaus “Clavier-Concerte” IV/1 (p. 435) 5 May 1768 Konzertsaal auf dem Kamp “musikalische Stücke auf dem Flügel” IV/2 (pp. 435–36) 6 March 1769 Konzertsaal auf dem Kamp “ein Clavier-Concert” IV/4 (pp. 437–38) 14 and 21 December 1769 Konzertsaal auf dem Kamp “ein Concert und eine Sonatine” IV/5 (pp. 438–39) 25 and 28 December 1770 Wurmisches Haus “auf dem Flügel” IV/8 (pp. 441–43) 12 December 1774 Konzertsaal auf dem Kamp “ein Concert auf dem Flügel […] vom IV/12 (pp. 446–47) Herrn Kapellmeister Bach componirt” 6 April 1778 Konzertsaal auf dem Kamp “ein Concert und ein Trio auf dem Fortepiano” IV/19 (pp. 455–56) 22 March 1779 Kramer-Amtshaus “ein Solo und ein Concert auf dem Forte Piano” IV/21 (p. 457) 29 March 1779 Kramer-Amtshaus “auf dem Forte Piano” IV/22 (p. 458) 14 October 1780 Drillhaus “auf dem Forte Piano” IV/26 (p. 460) own concertos. (Table 1 gives a brief overview of the avail- of style. The two works mark extreme positions of Bach’s able evidence.) The orchestral ensemble in these concerts Berlin concerto style. Their extended ritornellos signify a was presumably quite large—at least significantly larger valorization of the orchestral part, which strives for origi- than in the private performances in Berlin; by comparison, nality and unusual sound effects. In Wq 31 Bach differen- Friedrich Gottlob Klopstock reports an orchestral ensem- tiates the color palette of the strings through distinctive ble of “forty instruments” for the performance of the four playing techniques (pizzicato, double stops, con sordino) symphonies Wq 183 in Bach’s concert on 17 August 1776.8 and dynamic effects. In addition Wq 31 features unison playing and repeated 16th notes, which lend the work al- most symphonic traits.The crossing of genre boundaries in Concerto in C Minor, Wq 31 the slow middle movement, which is organized like a large Bach described the Concerto in C Minor in a letter of recitative tableau, is also exceptional. In this fashion the 28 April 1784 to the Greifswald lawyer Johann Heinrich solo instrument becomes somewhat akin to a protagonist Grave with the following words: “The Concerto in C Mi- in a dramatic action. The use of instrumental recitatives in nor was formerly one of my show horses. The recitative is the 1740s and 1750s in the Berlin School appears to have written out as I played it without a doubt.”9 The humor- catered to a certain popular taste. The highly dramatic en- ously reinterpreted term “Paradör” is, as is often the case try of the solo keyboard in the first movement (after an in- with Bach, borrowed from military parlance, and refers to terrupted cadence) with an augmented version of the main a show horse in a military parade. He uses the term also subject and the expressive recitative as well as its attacca in his letter of 25 September 1787 to Johann Jakob Hein- transition to the last movement seem to indicate that Bach rich Westphal to describe the demanding and striking key- intended to imitate an operatic scene in this work. It is a board sonatas Wq 65/16, 65/17, and 65/20, and apparently remarkable example of his artistic striving to redefine the describes with it works that he composed principally for genre traditions of the Baroque concerto. his own use and made available to his friends only at a late The similarity to the “Freie Fantasie,” which Bach de- point in time. veloped in the 1740s, is striking. We first encounter rec- Wq 31 was written in the same year as the Concertos itative-like middle movements in cyclical works in Bach’s in A Major, Wq 29, and B Minor, Wq 30 (both published first “Prussian” Sonata (Wq 48/1). Further examples can in CPEB:CW, III/9.9). Wq 30 can be considered a sister be found in concertos by Christoph Schaffrath (Con- work to Wq 31, for it displays similar eccentric hallmarks certo in A Major; D-B, Mus. ms. 19750/2) and Christian Friedrich Schale (Concerto in D Minor; D-B, Mus. ms. 8. Wiermann, 448–49. 19758/2). Johann Gottlieb Janitsch employs a recitative in 9. CPEB-Briefe, 2:1009: “Das Concert C mol war vor diesem eines his Trio in G Major (in D-B, SA 3462).
Recommended publications
  • Biography Thomaskantor Gotthold Schwarz As of March 2018

    Biography Thomaskantor Gotthold Schwarz As of March 2018

    Thomaskantor Gotthold Schwarz Gotthold Schwarz is the 17 th Thomaskantor after Johann Sebastian Bach. On 9 June 2016 he has been appointed as Thomaskantor and has been officially inaugurated on 20 August 2016. Born in Zwickau as a son of a cantor he gained his musical education at the “Hochschule für Kirchenmusik Dresden” (University for Church Music Dresden) and also at the “Hochschule für Musik und Theater „Felix Mendelssohn Bartholdy“ Leipzig” (University of Music and Theatre „Felix Mendelssohn Bartholdy“ Leipzig) after having been a member of Thomanerchor Leipzig for s short time in his childhood. He studied singing with Gerda Schriever, playing the organ with former St. Thomas Organist Hannes Kästner and Wolfgang Schetelich, as well as conducting with Max Pommer and Hans-Joachim Rotzsch. Furthermore he has worked with, amongst others, Hermann Christian Polster, Peter Schreier and Helmuth Rilling in masterclasses and academies. Gotthold Schwarz, who began to work as vocal trainer for the Thomanerchor Leipzig in 1979, stood in for the Thomaskantor for several times since the 1990's. On this position he led the motets, performances of cantatas and oratorios with the Thomanerchor Leipzig; moreover he was entrusted with other duties as an interim officiating cantor. Together with the world-famous boys’ choir he has been on numerous tours in Germany, Europe and overseas (Japan, China, USA, Canada), several together with the Gewandhausorchester Leipzig. Furthermore Gotthold Schwarz is initiator and leader of “Concerto vocale”, “Saxon Baroque Orchestra”, “Leipziger Cantorey” and “Bach Consort Leipzig”. In recognition of his special merits the versatiled singer and conductor was awarded with the Cross of Merit of the Federal Republic of Germany (1 st class) on 4 October 2017.
  • A Register of Music Performed in Concert, Nazareth, Pennsylvania from 1796 to 1845: an Annotated Edition of an American Moravian Document

    A Register of Music Performed in Concert, Nazareth, Pennsylvania from 1796 to 1845: an Annotated Edition of an American Moravian Document

    A register of music performed in concert, Nazareth, Pennsylvania from 1796 to 1845: an annotated edition of an American Moravian document Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Strauss, Barbara Jo, 1947- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 10/10/2021 23:14:00 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/347995 A REGISTER OF MUSIC PERFORMED IN CONCERT, NAZARETH., PENNSYLVANIA FROM 1796 TO 181+52 AN ANNOTATED EDITION OF AN AMERICAN.MORAVIAN DOCUMENT by Barbara Jo Strauss A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the SCHOOL OF MUSIC In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF MUSIC WITH A MAJOR IN MUSIC HISTORY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 7 6 Copyright 1976 Barbara Jo Strauss STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfill­ ment of requirements for an advanced degree at The Univer­ sity of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate ac­ knowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manu­ script in whole or in part may
  • 'Dream Job: Next Exit?'

    'Dream Job: Next Exit?'

    Understanding Bach, 9, 9–24 © Bach Network UK 2014 ‘Dream Job: Next Exit?’: A Comparative Examination of Selected Career Choices by J. S. Bach and J. F. Fasch BARBARA M. REUL Much has been written about J. S. Bach’s climb up the career ladder from church musician and Kapellmeister in Thuringia to securing the prestigious Thomaskantorat in Leipzig.1 Why was the latter position so attractive to Bach and ‘with him the highest-ranking German Kapellmeister of his generation (Telemann and Graupner)’? After all, had their application been successful ‘these directors of famous court orchestras [would have been required to] end their working relationships with professional musicians [take up employment] at a civic school for boys and [wear] “a dusty Cantor frock”’, as Michael Maul noted recently.2 There was another important German-born contemporary of J. S. Bach, who had made the town’s shortlist in July 1722—Johann Friedrich Fasch (1688–1758). Like Georg Philipp Telemann (1681–1767), civic music director of Hamburg, and Christoph Graupner (1683–1760), Kapellmeister at the court of Hessen-Darmstadt, Fasch eventually withdrew his application, in favour of continuing as the newly- appointed Kapellmeister of Anhalt-Zerbst. In contrast, Bach, who was based in nearby Anhalt-Köthen, had apparently shown no interest in this particular vacancy across the river Elbe. In this article I will assess the two composers’ positions at three points in their professional careers: in 1710, when Fasch left Leipzig and went in search of a career, while Bach settled down in Weimar; in 1722, when the position of Thomaskantor became vacant, and both Fasch and Bach were potential candidates to replace Johann Kuhnau; and in 1730, when they were forced to re-evaluate their respective long-term career choices.
  • Introduction

    Introduction

    Copyright © Thomas Braatz, 20071 Introduction This paper proposes to trace the origin and rather quick demise of the Andreas Stübel Theory, a theory which purportedly attempted to designate a librettist who supplied Johann Sebastian Bach with texts and worked with him when the latter composed the greater portion of the 2nd ‘chorale-cantata’ cycle in Leipzig from 1724 to early 1725. It was Hans- Joachim Schulze who first proposed this theory in 1998 after which it encountered a mixed reception with Christoph Wolff lending it some support in his Bach biography2 and in his notes for the Koopman Bach-Cantata recording series3, but with Martin Geck4 viewing it rather less enthusiastically as a theory that resembled a ball thrown onto the roulette wheel and having the same chance of winning a jackpot. 1 This document may be freely copied and distributed providing that distribution is made in full and the author’s copyright notice is retained. 2 Christoph Wolff, Johann Sebastian Bach: The Learned Musician (Norton, 2000), (first published as a paperback in 2001), p. 278. 3 Christoph Wolff, ‘The Leipzig church cantatas: the chorale cantata cycle (II:1724-1725)’ in The Complete Cantatas volumes 10 and 11 as recorded by Ton Koopman and published by Erato Disques (Paris, France, 2001). 4 Martin Geck, Bach: Leben und Werk, (Hamburg, 2000), p. 400. 1 Andreas Stübel Andreas Stübel (also known as Stiefel = ‘boot’) was born as the son of an innkeeper in Dresden on December 15, 1653. In Dresden he first attended the Latin School located there. Then, in 1668, he attended the Prince’s School (“Fürstenschule”) in Meißen.
  • T H O M a N E R C H

    T H O M a N E R C H

    Thomanerchor LeIPZIG DerThomaner chor Der Thomaner chor ts n te on C F o able T Ta b l e o f c o n T e n T s Greeting from “Thomaskantor” Biller (Cantor of the St Thomas Boys Choir) ......................... 04 The “Thomanerchor Leipzig” St Thomas Boys Choir Now Performing: The Thomanerchor Leipzig ............................................................................. 06 Musical Presence in Historical Places ........................................................................................ 07 The Thomaner: Choir and School, a Tradition of Unity for 800 Years .......................................... 08 The Alumnat – a World of Its Own .............................................................................................. 09 “Keyboard Polisher”, or Responsibility in Detail ........................................................................ 10 “Once a Thomaner, always a Thomaner” ................................................................................... 11 Soli Deo Gloria .......................................................................................................................... 12 Everyday Life in the Choir: Singing Is “Only” a Part ................................................................... 13 A Brief History of the St Thomas Boys Choir ............................................................................... 14 Leisure Time Always on the Move .................................................................................................................. 16 ... By the Way
  • 103 the Music Library of the Warsaw Theatre in The

    103 the Music Library of the Warsaw Theatre in The

    A. ŻÓRAWSKA-WITKOWSKA, MUSIC LIBRARY OF THE WARSAW..., ARMUD6 47/1-2 (2016) 103-116 103 THE MUSIC LIBRARY OF THE WARSAW THEATRE IN THE YEARS 1788 AND 1797: AN EXPRESSION OF THE MIGRATION OF EUROPEAN REPERTOIRE ALINA ŻÓRAWSKA-WITKOWSKA UDK / UDC: 78.089.62”17”WARSAW University of Warsaw, Institute of Musicology, Izvorni znanstveni rad / Research Paper ul. Krakowskie Przedmieście 32, Primljeno / Received: 31. 8. 2016. 00-325 WARSAW, Poland Prihvaćeno / Accepted: 29. 9. 2016. Abstract In the Polish–Lithuanian Common- number of works is impressive: it included 245 wealth’s fi rst public theatre, operating in War- staged Italian, French, German, and Polish saw during the reign of Stanislaus Augustus operas and a further 61 operas listed in the cata- Poniatowski, numerous stage works were logues, as well as 106 documented ballets and perform ed in the years 1765-1767 and 1774-1794: another 47 catalogued ones. Amongst operas, Italian, French, German, and Polish operas as Italian ones were most popular with 102 docu- well ballets, while public concerts, organised at mented and 20 archived titles (totalling 122 the Warsaw theatre from the mid-1770s, featured works), followed by Polish (including transla- dozens of instrumental works including sym- tions of foreign works) with 58 and 1 titles phonies, overtures, concertos, variations as well respectively; French with 44 and 34 (totalling 78 as vocal-instrumental works - oratorios, opera compositions), and German operas with 41 and arias and ensembles, cantatas, and so forth. The 6 works, respectively. author analyses the manuscript catalogues of those scores (sheet music did not survive) held Keywords: music library, Warsaw, 18th at the Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych in War- century, Stanislaus Augustus Poniatowski, saw (Pl-Wagad), in the Archive of Prince Joseph musical repertoire, musical theatre, music mi- Poniatowski and Maria Teresa Tyszkiewicz- gration Poniatowska.
  • Erwin Und Elmire 1776 (70’)

    Erwin Und Elmire 1776 (70’)

    Sound Reseach of Women Composers: Music of the Classical Period (CP 1) Anna Amalia Herzogin von Sachsen-Weimar-Eisenach 1739–1807 Erwin und Elmire 1776 (70’) Schauspiel mit Gesang nach einem Text von Johann Wolfgang von Goethe Erstveröffentlichung/First Publication erste vollständige szenische Aufführung am 25. Juni 2009 im Ekhof-Theater Gotha first complete scenic performance on June 25th 2009 at Ekhof-Theatre Gotha hrsg. von /edited by Peter Tregear Aufführungsmaterial leihweise / Performance material available for hire Personen Olympia: Sopran/Soprano Elmire: Sopran/Soprano Bernardo: Tenor oder/or Sopran/Soprano Erwin: Tenor oder/or Sopran/Soprano Orchesterbesetzung/Instrumentation 2 Flöten/2 Flutes 2 Oboen/2 Oboes Fagott/Bassoon 2 Hörner/2 Horns Violine 1/2 Viola Kontrabass Quelle: Anna Amalia Bibliothek, Weimar, Mus II a:98 (Partitur), Mus II c:1 (Vokalstimmen) © 2011 Furore Verlag, Naumburger Str. 40, D-34127 Kassel, www.furore-verlag.de Alle Rechte vorbehalten / Das widerrechtliche Kopieren von Noten wird privat- und strafrechtlich geahndet Printed in Germany / All rights reserved / Any unauthorized reproduction is prohibited by law Dieses Werk ist als Erstveröffentlichung nach §71 UrhG urheberrechtlich geschützt. Alle Aufführungen sind genehmigungs- und gebührenpflichtig. Furore Edition 2568 • ISMN: 979-0-50182-383-5 Inhalt/Contents Seite / Page Dr. Peter Tregear Erwin und Elmire – Eine Einführung 3 Professor Nicolas Boyle Goethes Erwin und Elmire in seiner Zeit 4 Dr. Lorraine Byrne Bodley Die Tücken des Musiktheaters: Anna Amalias
  • Bach and Money: Sources of Salary and Supplemental Income in Leipzig from 1723 to 1750*

    Bach and Money: Sources of Salary and Supplemental Income in Leipzig from 1723 to 1750*

    Understanding Bach, 12, 111–125 © Bach Network UK 2017 Young Scholars’ Forum Bach and Money: Sources of Salary and Supplemental Income in Leipzig * from 1723 to 1750 NOELLE HEBER It was his post as Music Director and Cantor at the Thomasschule that primarily marked Johann Sebastian Bach’s twenty-seven years in Leipzig. The tension around the unstable income of this occupation drove Bach to write his famous letter to Georg Erdmann in 1730, in which he expressed a desire to seek employment elsewhere.1 The difference between his base salary of 100 Thaler and his estimated total income of 700 Thaler was derived from legacies and foundations, funerals, weddings, and instrumental maintenance in the churches, although many payment amounts fluctuated, depending on certain factors such as the number of funerals that occurred each year. Despite his ongoing frustration at this financial instability, it seems that Bach never attempted to leave Leipzig. There are many speculations concerning his motivation to stay, but one could also ask if there was a financial draw to settling in Leipzig, considering his active pursuit of independent work, which included organ inspections, guest performances, private music lessons, publication of his compositions, instrumental rentals and sales, and, from 1729 to 1741, direction of the collegium musicum. This article provides a new and detailed survey of these sources of revenue, beginning with the supplemental income that augmented his salary and continuing with his freelance work. This exploration will further show that Leipzig seems to have been a strategic location for Bach to pursue and expand his independent work.
  • The Sources of the Christmas Interpolations in J. S. Bach's Magnificat in E-Flat Major (BWV 243A)*

    The Sources of the Christmas Interpolations in J. S. Bach's Magnificat in E-Flat Major (BWV 243A)*

    The Sources of the Christmas Interpolations in J. S. Bach's Magnificat in E-flat Major (BWV 243a)* By Robert M. Cammarota Apart from changes in tonality and instrumentation, the two versions of J. S. Bach's Magnificat differ from each other mainly in the presence offour Christmas interpolations in the earlier E-flat major setting (BWV 243a).' These include newly composed settings of the first strophe of Luther's lied "Vom Himmel hoch, da komm ich her" (1539); the last four verses of "Freut euch und jubiliert," a celebrated lied whose origin is unknown; "Gloria in excelsis Deo" (Luke 2:14); and the last four verses and Alleluia of "Virga Jesse floruit," attributed to Paul Eber (1570).2 The custom of troping the Magnificat at vespers on major feasts, particu­ larly Christmas, Easter, and Pentecost, was cultivated in German-speaking lands of central and eastern Europe from the 14th through the 17th centu­ ries; it continued to be observed in Leipzig during the first quarter of the 18th century. The procedure involved the interpolation of hymns and popu­ lar songs (lieder) appropriate to the feast into a polyphonic or, later, a con­ certed setting of the Magnificat. The texts of these interpolations were in Latin, German, or macaronic Latin-German. Although the origin oftroping the Magnificat is unknown, the practice has been traced back to the mid-14th century. The earliest examples of Magnifi­ cat tropes occur in the Seckauer Cantional of 1345.' These include "Magnifi­ cat Pater ingenitus a quo sunt omnia" and "Magnificat Stella nova radiat. "4 Both are designated for the Feast of the Nativity.' The tropes to the Magnificat were known by different names during the 16th, 17th, and early 18th centuries.
  • Schiller and Music COLLEGE of ARTS and SCIENCES Imunci Germanic and Slavic Languages and Literatures

    Schiller and Music COLLEGE of ARTS and SCIENCES Imunci Germanic and Slavic Languages and Literatures

    Schiller and Music COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES ImUNCI Germanic and Slavic Languages and Literatures From 1949 to 2004, UNC Press and the UNC Department of Germanic & Slavic Languages and Literatures published the UNC Studies in the Germanic Languages and Literatures series. Monographs, anthologies, and critical editions in the series covered an array of topics including medieval and modern literature, theater, linguistics, philology, onomastics, and the history of ideas. Through the generous support of the National Endowment for the Humanities and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, books in the series have been reissued in new paperback and open access digital editions. For a complete list of books visit www.uncpress.org. Schiller and Music r.m. longyear UNC Studies in the Germanic Languages and Literatures Number 54 Copyright © 1966 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons cc by-nc-nd license. To view a copy of the license, visit http://creativecommons. org/licenses. Suggested citation: Longyear, R. M. Schiller and Music. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1966. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.5149/9781469657820_Longyear Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Longyear, R. M. Title: Schiller and music / by R. M. Longyear. Other titles: University of North Carolina Studies in the Germanic Languages and Literatures ; no. 54. Description: Chapel Hill : University of North Carolina Press, [1966] Series: University of North Carolina Studies in the Germanic Languages and Literatures. | Includes bibliographical references. Identifiers: lccn 66064498 | isbn 978-1-4696-5781-3 (pbk: alk. paper) | isbn 978-1-4696-5782-0 (ebook) Subjects: Schiller, Friedrich, 1759-1805 — Criticism and interpretation.
  • Arnold Schering on “Who Sang the Soprano and Alto Parts in Bach's

    Arnold Schering on “Who Sang the Soprano and Alto Parts in Bach's

    Arnold Schering on “Who sang the soprano and alto parts in Bach’s cantatas?” Translation by Thomas Braatz © 2009 [The following is a translation of pages 43 to 48 from Arnold Schering’s book, Johann Sebastian Bachs Leipziger Kirchenmusik, published in 1936 in Leipzig and presented in facsimile after the translation. To distinguish between Schering’s original footnotes and mine, his are highlighted in red while mine are left in black.] The paragraph leading into this passage describes Georg PhilippTelemann’s (1681- 1767) sacred music activities in the Neukirche (New Church) in Leipzig. These cantata performances were accomplished by Telemann with the help of university students only and without any assistance from the Thomaner1 choir(s) which were under Johann Kuhnau’s (1660-1722 - Bach’s immediate predecessor) direction. Jealous of the success that Telemann was having with his performances, Kuhnau commented that the young people there [Neukirche] had no real idea about what the proper style of singing in a church was all about and that their goal was “directed toward a so- called cantata-like manner of singing”. By this he evidently meant the elegant, modern way that male falsettists2 sang their solos [compared to the soprano and alto voices of young boys before their mutation]. What was Bach’s way of treating this matter in his sacred music? A cantor’s constant concern, as we have seen, is the ability to obtain and train good sopranos and basses. Kuhnau’s experience, that among his young scholars strong bass singers were a rarity,3 was an experience that his cantor predecessors in Leipzig had already had.
  • FEST05 Lutheran Vespers.Indd

    FEST05 Lutheran Vespers.Indd

    the artists programme thursday august 3 at 1:00 pm | christ church cathedral Madeline Lucy Smith lutheran vespers: soprano songs for troubled times Shane Hanson countertenor Samuel Scheidt (1587-1654): Erik Kallo Tulerunt Dominum countertenor / tenor Taka Shimojima tenor Heinrich Schütz (1585-1672): Die mit Tränen säen Ian Bannerman tenor Johann Rudolph Ahle (1625-1673): O lux beata Trinitas Jacob Gramit bass with Johann Rudolph Ahle: Magnificat à 7 Ellen Marple Heinrich Schütz: Jeremy Berkman Herr nun lässest du deinen Diener Nathan Wilkes Alexander J. Fisher sackbuts Hans Leo Hassler (1564-1612): Pater Noster Christopher Bagan Johann Christoph Bach (1642-1703): organ Der Gerechte ob er gleich Johann Michael Bach (1648-1694): Ich weiß, daß mein Erlöser lebt Johann Hermann Schein (1586-1630): Da pacem Domine Andrea Gabrieli (1532-1585): Benedicam Dominum Pre-concert chat with host Matthew White at 12:15: Jacob Gramit THE UNAUTHORISED USE OF ANY VIDEO OR AUDIO RECORDING DEVICE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED earlymusic.bc.ca Text Insert - Lutheran Vespers: Songs for Troubled Times Vancouver Bach Festival 2017 1 programme notes Between 1618 and 1648, Europe and Germany in particular were ravaged by the Thirty Years’ War. Following the Peace of Westphalia, the immediate conflicts were stayed, but the feelings of uncertainly remained, as they often do in the aftermath of a political upheaval. In the Lutheran church, the music for the evening Vespers service reflected this, praying for safety as the light of day turned into the uncertainty and potential danger of night. In a concert rather than a liturgical context, today’s programme samples music that could have been found in the context of that service.