DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography Similes: Bibliography I. General Addison, C. 1993. “From Literal to Figurative: an Introduction to the Study of Simile,” College English 55.4 (Apr.) 402–419. Aristotle. 1973. The Poetics, Longinus On the Sublime, Demetrius On Style. Harvard 1932. Baldwin, R. and R. Paris. 1983. The Book of Similes. Futura. Bethlehem, L. S. 1996. “Simile and Figurative Language,” Poetics Today 17.2 (Summer) 203-240. Bloom, H. 1986. Homer (Modern Critical Views). Chelsea House. Boys-Stones, G. R., ed. 2003. Metaphor, Allegory, and the Classical Tradition. Oxford. Brogan, J. V. 1986. Stevens and Simile: A Theory of Language. Princeton. Bullinger, E. W. 2004. Figures of Speech Used in the Bible (Explained and Illustrated). 1898; Baker Books 1968. Cooper, D. E. 1986. Metaphor (Blackwell). Grassi, E. 1994. The Primordial Metaphor (La Metafora inaudita,1990), tr. Laura P. and Manuel S. in Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies. Hanson, J. 1976. Similes: As Gentle as a Lamb, Spin Like a Top, & Other “Like” or “As” Comparisons Between Unlike Things (Lerner). Hawkes, T. 1972. Metaphor. London. Hiraga, M. K. 2005. Metaphor and Iconicity. Palgrove. Hornsby, R. 1970. Patterns of Action in the Aeneid: An Interpretation of Vergil’s Epic Similes. Iowa City. 2 Innes, D. 2003. “Metaphor, Simile, and Allegory as Ornaments of Style.” In Boys-Stones 2003:7– 27. Kirby, J. T. 1997. “Aristotle on Metaphor,” The American Journal of Philology 118.4 (Winter) 517– 554. Kittay, E. F. 1987. Metaphor – Its Cognitive Force and Linguistic Structure. Clarendon. Kövecses, Z. 2005. Metaphor in Culture. Cambridge. Lakoff, G.; M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago. Leary, D. E. (ed.). 1990. Metaphors in the History of Psychology. Cambridge. Leidl, C. G. 2003. “The Harlot’s Art: Metaphor and Literary Criticism,” in Boys-Stones: 32–54. Levin, S. R. 1977. The Semantics of Metaphor. Baltimore. Lodge, D. 1977. Modes of Modern Writing. Hodder Arnold. Lucas, D. W. 1968. Aristotle Poetics. Introduction, Commentary and Appendices. Oxford. Lucas, F. L. 1962. Style. Collier. Lloyd, G. E. R. 2003. “Chinese Reflexions,” in Boys-Stones, Chap. 3. Mac Cormac, E. R. 1985. A Cognitive Theory of Metaphor. Bradford Books. McCall, M. H. Jr. 1969. Ancient Rhetorical Theories of Simile and Comparison. Boston. Nowottny, W. 1962. The Language Poets Use. New York. Olso, K. 1980. Ariosto and the Classical Simile. Harvard Studies in Romance Languages, V. 36. Organ, T. W. 1949. An Index To Aristotle in English Translation. Princeton. Ortony, A. 1993. Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge, England. 1979; 2nd ed. 3 Richards, I. A. 1936. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford 1965. The Mary Flexner Lectures on the Humanities III at Bryn Mawr College. Ricoeur, P. 1977. The Rule of Metaphor. London. Silk, M. S. 1996. “metaphor and simile,” Oxford Classical Dictionary (3rd ed.) 966–968. Sommer, E. (ed.) 1988. Similes Dictionary. Detroit. A collection of more than 16,000 comparison phrases . arranged under 500+ thematic categories. Stanford, W. B. 1936. Greek Metaphor. Oxford. Thomas, Owen. 1969. Metaphor and Related Subjects. New York. Turbayne, C. M. 1962. The Myth of Metaphor. New Haven. White, R. M. 1986. The Structure of Metaphor. Oxford. Wilstach, F. J. 1924. A Dictionary of Similes. New York (1916). A reference to 17,000 similes from 1865 authors under 3465 subject headings — with a heading attributed to George Moore: “It is hard to find a simile when one is seeking for one.” Ziolkowski, J. E. 2014. Plato’s Similes: A Compendium of 500 Similes in 35 Dialogues. http://wp.chs.harvard.edu/ziolkowski II. Similes in Homer Alden, M. 2012. “The Despised Migrant (Il. 9.648 = 16.59),” in Homeric Contexts: Neoanalysis and the Interpretation of Oral Poetry, Franco Montanari, Antonios Rengakos, and Christos Tsagalis, (eds.) Berlin, 115–132. Anhalt, E. K. 1995. “Barrier and Transcendence: The Door and the Eagle in Iliad 24.314–21,” The Classical Quarterly 45:2, 280–295. 4 Anhalt, E. K. 1997. “A Bull for Poseidon: The Bull’s Bellow in Odyssey 21.46–50,” The Classical Quarterly 47.1, 15–25. Anhalt, E. K. 2002. “A Matter of Perspective: Penelope and the Nightingale in ‘Odyssey’ 19.512– 534,” The Classical Journal 97.2, 145–159. Arieti, J. 1986. “Achilles' Alienation in Iliad 9,” The Classical Journal 82:1, 1–27, spec. 22–24. Austin, N. 1991. “The Wedding Text in Homer's "Odyssey," Arion Third Series, 1:2, 227–243, spec. 233 and 239–241. Barclay, E. 1900. Homeric Similes from the Iliad. London. Bassett, S. E. 1921. ”The Function of the Homeric Simile,” TAPA 52 132–147. Bergren, A. 1980. “Allegorizing Winged Words: Simile and Symbolization in Odyssey V,” The Classical World 74:2, 109–123. Beye, C. R. 1984. ”Repeated Similes in the Homeric Poems,” Studies Presented to Sterling Dow on His Eightieth Birthday, ed. A. Boegehold et al. Durham, N. C., 7–13. Bradley, E. 1967. “Hector and the Simile of the Snowy Mountain,” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 98, 37–41. Buxton, R. 2004. “Similes and other likenesses,” chapter 9 (139–155) in The Cambridge Companion to Homer, ed. R. Fowler. Clarke, M. 1995. “Between Lions and Men: Images of the Hero in the Iliad,” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 36, 137–159. Clayton, B. 2011. “Polyphemus and Odysseus in the Nursery: Mother’s Milk in the Cyclopeia,” Arethusa 44.3, 255–277. 5 Coffey, M. 1957. “The Function of the Homeric Simile,” American Journal of Philology 78.2, 113– 132. Combellack, F. M. 1987. “The λύσις ἐκ τῆς λέξεως,” American Journal of Philology 108.2, 202–219, spec. 207–208. Crissy, K. 1997. “Herakles, Odysseus, and the Bow: "Odyssey" 21.11–41,” The Classical Journal 9:1, 41–53. Dué, C. 2010. “Agamemnon’s Densely-Packed Sorrow in Iliad 10: A Hypertextual Reading of a Homeric Simile,” Trends in Classics 2:2, 277–299. Dué, C. and M. Ebbott. 2012. “Mothers-in-Arms: soldiers’ emotional bonds and Homeric similes,” An International Journal of the Humanities 1–17. Dunbar, H. 1962. A Complete Concordance to the Odyssey of Homer. Rev. B. Marzullo, Hildesheim. Erbse, H., ed 1969 . 1988. Dunkle, R. 1987. “Nestor,Odysseus and the MÉTIS-BIÊ Antithesis: The Funeral Games, Iliad 23,” The Classical World 81.1 (Sep. – Oct., 1987) 1–17. Ebeling, H. 1885. Lexicon Homericum (on-line). Fagan, P. L. 2001. Horses in the Similes of the Iliad: a Case Study. Dissertation, Toronto. Feeney, D. 2014. “First Similes in Epic,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 144.2 (Autumn) 189–228. Felsen-Rubin, N. 1994. Regarding Penelope. From Character to Poetics. Princeton. Foley, H. P. 1978. “Reverse Similes and Sex Roles in the Odyssey,” Arethusa 11: 1, 2, 7–26. Reprinted in Women in the Ancient World: the Arethusa Papers, ed. J. Peradotto and J.P. 6 Sullivan (Buffalo 1984) 59–78; in Homer's Odyssey, ed. H. Bloom (N.Y. 1988); and in L. E. Doherty (ed.), Oxford Readings 189–207. Fränkel, H. 1921. Die homerische Gleichnisse. Göttingen. Friedrich, R. 1981. “On the Compositional Use of Similes in the Odyssey,” The American Journal of Philology 102:2, 120–137. Fulkerson, L. 2002. “Epic Ways of Killing a Woman: Gender and Transgression in ‘Odyssey’ 22.465–472,” The Classical Journal 97.4, 335–350. Gaca, K. L. 2008. “Reinterpreting the Homeric Simile of Iliad 16.7–11: The Girl and Her Mother In Ancient Greek Warfare,” American Journal of Philology 129.2 (2008): 145–171. Glenn, J. 1998. "Odysseus Confronts Nausicaa: The Lion Simile of "Odyssey" 6.130–136," The Classical World 92:2, 107–116. Gottschall, J. 2001. “Homer’s Human Animal: Ritual Combat in the Iliad,” Philosophy and Literature 25.2 (October) 278–294. Green, W. C. 1877. The Similes of Homer’s Iliad, Translated, with Introduction and Notes, London. Heiden, B. 1998. “The Simile of the Fugitive Homicide, Iliad 24.480–84: Analogy, Foiling, and Allusion,” The American Journal of Philology 119.1 (Spring) 1–10, Baltimore. Held, G. F. 1995. Aristotle's Teleological Theory of Tragedy and Epic. Heidelberg. Chapter 6: "The Snow Simile at Iliad 3.222.” Holmes, B. 2007. “The Iliad’s Economy of Pain,” Transactions of the American Philological Society 137, 45–84, spec. 71–78. Ingalls, W. B. “Formular Density in the Similes of the Iliad,” Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-) 109 (1979) 87–109. 7 Kirk, G. S. 1976. Homer and the Oral Tradition. Cambridge UP. Lateiner, D. 2013. “Homer’s Social-Psychological Spaces and Places,” in Geography, Topography, Landscape, M. Skempis and I. Ziogas (eds.). Berlin. 63–94, spec. 85–87. Lee, D. J. N. 1964. The Similes of the Iliad and the Odyssey Compared. Melbourne. Lonsdale, S. 1990. Creatures of Speech: Lion, Herding, and Hunting Similes in the Iliad. Beiträge zur Altertumskunde, 5. Stuttgart. Reprint 2013. Losada, L. 1985. “Odyssey 21. 411: The Swallow's Call,” Classical Philology 80:1, 33–34. Lowell C. 2011. The Overburdened Earth. Dissertation, Austin, Texas. Marshall, D. 1986. “Similes and Delay” in Bloom’s Homer: 233–236. Martin, R. P. 1997. “Similes and Performance,” Chapter 6 (138–166) in Egbert Bakker and Ahuvia Kahane (edd.), Written Voices, Spoken Signs: Tradtition, Performance, and the Epic Text. Cambridge, MA. Mije, S. van der. 2011. “Bad Herbs—the Snake Simile in Iliad 22,” Mnemosyne 64:3, 359–382. Mills, S. 2000. “Achilles, Patroclus and Parental Care in Some Homeric Similes,” Greece & Rome, Second Series, 47:1, 3–18. Minchin, E. 2001. “Similes in Homer: Image, Mind’s Eye, and Memory,” (25–32) in J. Watson (ed.), Speaking Volumes: Orality and Literacy in the Greek and Roman World. Leiden. Moulton, C. 1974. “Similes in the Iliad,” Hermes 102: 381–397. Moulton, C. 1977. Similes in the Homeric Poems, Hypomnemata 49.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hermes As Guide and Leader of Souls by Brian Clark
    CROSSING THE THRESHOLD: Hermes as Guide and Leader of Souls Brian Clark The Threshold to the Underworld The classical motif of the hero’s descent into the underworld or katabasis has been used in psychoanalytic writings (especially Jungian) as a metaphor for a descent into unconscious terrain, which is dark and unknown, contrary to the Olympian ideals of the ego. The underworld sphere is unlike anything the hero has known to date: the values, customs and laws of this domain are alien. The encounter with the underworld terrain is a rich metaphor for passages in a life when the psychological landscape shifts and becomes unfamiliar. These passages in one’s life are evoked out of a sense of loss, grief or an encounter with death. The space that separates the two spheres between what has been known, but now lost, and what is unknown but looming ahead is a liminal or suspended state. What the hero has previously known is now suspended; old forms of familiarity are not available. The hero, symbolic of the conscious knowing of self and mastery of the world that encompassed him, now faces a descent into an alien realm that is dark, foreign and dangerous. The threshold between these two worlds (between what is known, light and conscious and what is unknown, dark and unconscious) requires guidance and direction. Once the threshold has been crossed into the unknown, the hero cannot be in control of this world through his strength; his identity now is suspended and the fixed mental images that once bound him to the world are in flux.
    [Show full text]
  • CLAS 346 Fall 2013 GREEK DRAMA Prof. Philip Waddell 3:30-4:45 TTH
    CLAS 346 Fall 2013 GREEK DRAMA Prof. Philip Waddell 3:30-4:45 TTH Modern Languages 310 214 Learning Services Building Office Hours: TTh 2-3 (and by appt.) Office: (520) 621 – 7418; [email protected] COURSE TA: Victor Republicano Office Hours: TBA email: [email protected] REQUIRED TEXTS: Aeschylus Aeschylus I: The Persians, The Seven Against Thebes, The Suppliant Maidens, Prometheus Bound, Mark Griffith, Glenn W. Most, David Grene, Richmond Lattimore, eds., transls. (University of Chicago, 3rd Edition, 2013) ISBN: 978-0226311449 Aeschylus II: The Oresteia, Mark Griffith, Glenn W. Most, David Grene, Richmond Lattimore, eds., transls. (University of Chicago, 3rd Edition, 2013) ISBN: 978-0226311470 Aristophanes Four Plays by Aristophanes: The Birds; The Clouds; The Frogs; Lysistrata, William Arrowsmith, Richmond Lattimore, and Douglass Parker, ed., transl. (Meridian Classics, 1984). ISBN: 978-0452007178 Euripides Euripides I: Alcestis, Medea, The Children of Heracles, Hippolytus, Mark Griffith, Glenn W. Most, David Grene, Richmond Lattimore, eds., transls. (University of Chicago, 3rd Edition, 2013) ISBN: 978-0226308807 Euripides II: Andromache, Hecuba, The Suppliant Women, Electra, Mark Griffith, Glenn W. Most, David Grene, Richmond Lattimore, eds., transls. (University of Chicago, 3rd Edition, 2013) ISBN: 978-0226308784 Euripides V: Bacchae, Iphigenia in Aulis, The Cyclops, Rhesus, Mark Griffith, Glenn W. Most, David Grene, Richmond Lattimore, eds., transls. (University of Chicago, 3rd Edition, 2013) ISBN: 978-0226308982 Sophocles Sophocles I: Antigone, Oedipus The King, Oedipus at Colonus, Mark Griffith, Glenn W. Most, David Grene, Richmond Lattimore, eds., transls. (University of Chicago, 3rd Edition, 2013) ISBN: 978-0226311517 Sophocles II: Ajax, The Women of Trachis, Electra, Philoctetes, The Trackers, Mark Griffith, Glenn W.
    [Show full text]
  • BIBLIOGRAPHY Quotations from the Bible and the Apocrypha
    2007122. Larsen. 10_Bibliography. Proef 4. 18-3-2008:14.08, page 225. BIBLIOGRAPHY Quotations from the Bible and the Apocrypha comply with the New Revised Standard Version (NRSV) when nothing else is stated. Ancient Texts Achilles Tatius.TranslatedbyS.Gaselee.Rev.ed.LoebClassicalLibrary.Lon- don: William Heinemann, 1969. Achilles Tatius. Leucippe and Clitophon.TranslatedbyJohnJ.Winkler.Pages170– 284 in Collected Ancient Greek Novels. Edited by B.P. Reardon. Berkeley: Uni- versity of California Press, 1989. Aeschylus.TranslatedbyHerbertWeirSmyth.2 vols. Loeb Classical Library. London: William Heinemann, 1963. Aeschylus. The Libation Bearers. Translated by Richmond Lattimore. Pages 1:93– 131 in The Complete Greek Tragedies. Edited by David Grene and Richmond Lattimore. 4 vols. Centennial ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992. Aristophanes. Frogs. Assemblywomen. Wealth.TranslatedbyJeffrey Henderson. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2002. Aristotle. The “Art” of Rhetoric. Translated by John Henry Freese. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2000. ———. Poetics. Translated by Stephen Halliwell. Loeb Classical Library. Cam- bridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1995. Augustine. In Evangelium Johannis tractatus. Patrologia latina 35:1579–976. Edited by J.-P. Migne. 217 vols. Paris, 1844–1864. The Bible: Authorized King James Version. Oxford World’s Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. Chariton. Callirhoe. Translated by G.P. Goold. Loeb Classical Library. Cam- bridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1995. ———. Chaereas and Callirhoe.TranslatedbyB.P.Reardon.Pages17–124 in Collected Ancient Greek Novels. Edited by B.P. Reardon. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989. Epiphanius. Panarion.Patrologiagraeca41:173–42:832.EditedbyJ.-P.Migne. 162 vols. Paris, 1857–1886. Euripides.TranslatedbyDavidKovacs.6 vols.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on Homer's Modern English Lliads
    fan C. Johnston Review Article The Merit of a Translation: Reflections on Homer's Modern English lliads Homer: The Iliad. Translated by Robert Fagles. New York: Penguin, 1990. Homer: The Iliad. Translated by Robert Fitzgerald. New York: Anchor/Doubleday, 1974. Homer: The Iliad. Translated by Martin Hammond. Bungay: Penguin, 1987. Homer: The Iliad. Translated by E. V. Rieu. Bungay: Penguin, 1950. The Iliad of Homer. Translated by Andrew Lang, Walter Leaf, and Emest Myers. New York: Random, 1950. The Iliad of Homer. Translated by Richmond Lattimore. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1951. JOHNSON. 'We must try its effect as an English poem; that is the way to judge of the merit of a translation. Translations are, in general, for people who cannot read the origiual. ' .. BOSWELL. 'The rrmh is, it is impossible perfectly to translate poetry. In a different language it may be the same tune, but it has not the same tone.' (Boswell 921) George Chapman, the first great translator of the Iliad into English, had little sympathy for his critics. "Envious Windfuckers," he called them (quoted Logue 1). The acerbic tone indicates that already in the early HOMER'S MODERN ENGLISH ILIADS 237 seventeenth century Chapman was conscious of carrying on a lively and established tradition, in which translators of the classics and the scholarly defenders of the original texts attacked each other with all the consider­ able rhetorical viciousness at their command. More than egos were involved, of course, since direct access to pagan texts, many of them masterpieces, conferred-and, to a far lesser but still significant extent (at least within the university) still confers-cultural power.
    [Show full text]
  • Translating and Adapting Aeschylus' Seven Against Thebes in the United
    Giovanna Di Martino Translating and Adapting Aeschylus’ Seven Against Thebes in the United States Σ Skenè Studies II • 4 Table of contents Skenè Studies II • 4 Foreword Giovanna Di Martino1 1. Russian Formalism:Translating “The road which and turns backAdapting on 2 itself” 3 2.Aeschylus’ The Signifier as Pure Seven Form Against Thebes4 3. Seeing as: Wittgenstein’s Duck-rabbit 5 4. The Bakhtin Circle in the United States6 5. Discourse in Art and Life 7 5.1 Speech Genres and Language Games 8 5.2 The Construction of the Utterance 9 6. The Syntactical Relations of Reported Speech 11 7. The Objects of Dialogism: The Familiarity of the Novel 12 8. Dialogization of the Object 13 9. Chronotopes, or the Space/Time of Representation 14 Conclusion 15 Works Cited 16 Index Σ TableSKENÈ ofTheatre contents and Drama Studies Executive Editor Guido Avezzù. General Editors Guido Avezzù, Silvia Bigliazzi. Editorial Board Simona Brunetti, Francesco Lupi, Nicola Pasqualicchio, Susan Payne, Gherardo Ugolini. Managing Editors Bianca Del Villano, Savina Stevanato. Assistant Managing Valentina Adami, Emanuel Stelzer, Roberta Zanoni. ForewordEditors 1 Communication Chiara Battisti, Sidia Fiorato. Staff Giuseppe Capalbo, Francesco Dall’Olio, Marco Duranti, 1. Russian Formalism:Antonietta “The Provenza. road which turns back on 2 Advisoryitself” Board Anna Maria Belardinelli, Anton Bierl, Enoch Brater, 3 Richard Allen Cave, Rosy Colombo, Claudia Corti, 2. The SignifierMarco as Pure De Marinis, Form Tobias Döring, Pavel Drábek, 4 3. Seeing as: Wittgenstein’sPaul Edmondson, Duck-rabbit Keir Douglas Elam, Ewan Fernie, 5 Patrick Finglass, Enrico Giaccherini, Mark Griffith, 4. The Bakhtin DanielaCircle Guardamagna, Stephen Halliwell, 6 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Classics 24 Myths and Legends of the Trojan War Fall 2010 MWF 3:00-3:50 Votey 105
    Classics 24 Myths and Legends of the Trojan War Fall 2010 MWF 3:00-3:50 Votey 105 Robert Rodgers 481 Main Street, Room 103 [email protected] 656-4626 Office hours: M 9:30-10:30, W 1:00-2:00, F 1:30-2:30, and by appointment COURSE OBJECTIVE: Introducing students to a careful reading of ancient works of literature which deal with the general theme of the war between Greeks and Trojans. The theme of the Trojan War was a part of the Greek sense of self-identity, and it was used again and again as the historical-mythological background against which Greeks and their successors turned in recurrent searches to know themselves. Textbooks: Susan Woodford, The Trojan War in Ancient Art The Iliad of Homer, trans. Richmond Lattimore Homer Odyssey, trans. Richmond Lattimore Aeschylus I Oresteia, trans. Richmond Lattimore Sophocles Plays Euripides Ten Plays Virgil Aeneid, trans. Fitzgerald Week 1 (30 Aug.-3 Sept.) Introduction Weekly Quizzes Weeks 2-4 (8-24 Sept.) Homer's Iliad Homer paper due: 15 October Weeks 5-7 (27 Sept.-15 Oct.) Homer's Odyssey Midterm Test: 15 October Weeks 8-10 (18 Oct.-5 Nov.) Athenian drama Drama/Virgil paper due: 8 December Weeks 11-14 (8 Nov.-8 Dec.) Virgil's Aeneid Final Exam (cumulative): 11 December August M 30 Introduction: Synoptic story September W 1 Epic as genre; Homer; Dates F 3 Homeric narrative M 6 LABOR DAY W 8 Homer's Iliad, Books 1-3 F 10 Homer's Iliad, Books 4-6 M 13 Homer's Iliad, Books 7-9 W 15 Homer's Iliad, Books 10-12 F 17 Homer's Iliad, Books 13-15 M 20 Homer's Iliad, Books 16-18 W 22 Homer's Iliad, Books 19-21 F 24 Homer's Iliad, Books 22-24 M 27 Homer's Odyssey, Books 1-3 W 29 Homer's Odyssey, Books 4-6 October F 1 Homer's Odyssey, Books 7-9 M 4 Homer's Odyssey, Books 10-12 W 6 Homer's Odyssey, Books 13-15 F 8 Homer's Odyssey, Books 16-18 M 11 Homer's Odyssey, Books 19-21 W 13 Homer's Odyssey, Books 22-24 F 15 MIDTERM TEST.
    [Show full text]
  • ODYSSEY by Homer
    ! !English For review (not assigned)! ! "Heroic Enterprise" December 22, 1996, By Richard Jenkyns (from The New York Times) a review of THE ODYSSEY By Homer. Translated by Robert Fagles. Introduction and notes by Bernard Knox. 541 pp. New York: Viking. $35. Translators are the most generous of people, especially translators of poetry: they act as go-betweens, bringing us to an acquaintance with literatures other than our own, knowing all the while that there is so much in the best verse that can never be carried across from one language to another. In some respects, though, Homer is easier to translate than many great poets: the ''Iliad'' and the ''Odyssey'' depend much less on nuances of diction and the complex overtones of words than (say) Virgil or Aeschylus, and each is carried forward by a strong plot and a forceful narrative drive. Amazingly, E. V. Rieu's prose version of the ''Odyssey,'' first published in 1946, was Penguin Books' best-selling paperback until they knocked it from first place by publishing another literary classic, ''Lady Chatterley's Lover.'' Rieu seems dated today, sometimes bureaucratic (''Amphinomus carried the day and the meeting adjourned''), often too polite (for ''Cease these outrages'' he has ''I do ask you to refrain from these outrages'') and generally rather pedestrian, but his success showed that Homer can command a large modern audience. A new version of Rieu, revised and much improved by his son, was published in 1991; either this or the rival prose translation by Walter Shewring in Oxford's World's Classics series is a good one for the reader who is looking for the closest rendering of Homer's words, though neither is as close as Martin Hammond's Penguin translation of the ''Iliad,'' which like the Authorized Version of the Bible manages to sound like real language while remaining extraordinarily near to the original words.
    [Show full text]
  • Richmond Lattimore the New Testament
    Richmond Lattimore The New Testament neurophysiologicalKris is alphabetical Jesusand instrument often posits alight some as tangiblefisheye pliantly Zeb snatch or prolapse quixotically voluminously. and regorged If discursive resistingly. or unicostatePetit and Nickey?Fredrick usually safeguards his grebe thwart ita or renovating vitalistically and therein, how unexecuted is By richmond lattimore does it, richmond lattimore new testament continued support. Quotes and he was mooted, i broke the bible to sign up against them: electronic databases this point, richmond lattimore new testament. Top of richmond lattimore also, and simon the desert forty days, richmond lattimore new testament spend it bore fruit of. But to new testament so many translations of richmond lattimore is nothing will be rather plain meaning lost in it was a mark appears first, richmond lattimore the new testament to jump to. Romans out from your vip icon and translations of the same period of richmond lattimore new testament by a new? They brought him a man who was deaf and could barely speak, and entreated him to lay his hand upon him. Hellenistic era everywhere everything that has two poems from new testament by richmond lattimore new testament, richmond lattimore new testament, which published translations by, to modernize the will bear a blind and. And did you never enter a continuous story bibles in classical greek classics richmond lattimore new testament follow me weekly book is. Teacher and a very easy mistake to which may it happened in paotingfu, richmond lattimore new testament or avestan and he was a noun. Có lẽ ip został wcześniej użyty do the lattimore new testament.
    [Show full text]
  • Rewriting the Greeks: the Translations, Adaptations, Distant Relatives and Productions of Aeschylus’ Tragedies in the United States of America from 1900 to 2009
    Rewriting the Greeks: The Translations, Adaptations, Distant Relatives and Productions of Aeschylus’ Tragedies in the United States of America from 1900 to 2009. Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Bethany Rose Banister Rainsberg, M.A. Graduate Program in Theatre The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Stratos E. Constantinidis, Advisor Dr. Bruce Heiden Dr. Joy Reilly Dr. Anthony Hill Copyright by Bethany Rose Banister Rainsberg 2010 Abstract The purpose of this study is to examine the practices of rewriting Aeschylus’ tragedies for American audiences and the manner in which these rewrites are “read” by stage directors who adapt them in their academic and non-academic theatre productions in the United States. In order to analyze the translation and performance practices of Aeschylus’ plays, this study will examine all English language translations, adaptations, and distant relatives of Aeschylus’ works for the twenty and twenty-first centuries and analyze key moments that connect and illuminate those works. The two central questions that drive this investigation are: (1) what kind of choices have the English-speaking translators made regarding the tragedies of Aeschylus, and (2) how have Aeschylus’ tragedies been rewritten by the practitioners of the American stage? Because of the proliferation and variance of Aeschylean translations into English, and research published to-date, an examination of these practices and texts provides a rich source for analyzing the larger issues of practice and critical evaluation of translation and performance. The seven tragedies of Aeschylus (Agamemnon, Libation Bearers, Eumenides, Prometheus Bound, Persians, Suppliants, and Seven Against Thebes) and the manner in which they plays have been interpreted by translators and producers from 1900 to 2009 will provide the data for this study.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rhetorical Function of Tecmessa, Chrysothemis, and Ismene in Tragedies of Sophocles and Selected Adaptations
    Forgotten Figures: The Rhetorical Function of Tecmessa, Chrysothemis, and Ismene in Tragedies of Sophocles and Selected Adaptations A dissertation submitted by Tiffany Pounds-Williams in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Drama Tufts University May 2017 © CC-BY 2017, Tiffany Pounds-Williams Adviser: Dr. Monica White Ndounou Abstract This investigation centers on the forgotten figures, three Sophoclean women who exist largely in the margins of scholarship on Greek tragedy and who are often underutilized in adaptations. For instance, Judith Butler, Hegel, and Jean Racine each overlook them. These women, Tecmessa, Chrysothemis, and Ismene, have much in common. They were all royal at one time, have vital rhetorical functions, such as increasing pity and fear in the spectator and balancing the arguments of the protagonist and/or antagonist, and they ultimately disappear from their play or become mute characters, often without explanation or reference. As a result of hierarchical bias toward tragic heroes, which is inherently patriarchal, the quieter battles of the forgotten figures against gender inequality, slavery, and psychological trauma are missed and gender norms and class structure are reinforced. This study follows the example of feminist Adrienne Rich, who suggests re-reading canonical plays from a feminist point of view in order to challenge patriarchy and identify missed opportunities to discuss the merits of female characters. In doing so, the forgotten figures are shown to not only be rhetorically significant in Sophocles’ plays and adaptations, but to be a necessary element of the tragic structure through their increase of pity and fear in spectators and through their ability to highlight tragic heroes, the main conflict, and contemporary societal concerns, such as psychoanalysis, gender equality, and expressionism.
    [Show full text]
  • Richmond Lattimore's Introduction
    Richmond Lattimore’s Introduction THE ILIAD OF HOMER Richmond Lattimore’s introduction to his translation of The Iliad of Homer appeared in editions published from 1951 to 2011. This PDF was scanned from the first impression of the 1962 illustrated edition (with drawings by Leonard Baskin). ©1951 by The University of Chicago. INTRODUCTION I HAVE tried in this introduction to put before the reader the infor­ mation that will help him to a more complete understanding of the translation. 'Information', though, if it concerns Homer, means contro­ versy; so I have had to cut a rather sweeping path through a mass of difficult or insoluble problems, working trom the text and not trom the literature on the subject. The exposition will of course not have the au­ thority ofa properly documented monograph. Some ofmy interpretations I should like, in some more appropriate place, to elaborate and defend. Still, all this aside, the introduction represents the translator's ideas about the Iliad. Even a select bibliography is, accordingly, not called for here, but I may mention a few works, some ofwhich I have referred to briefly in the following pages, which will be particularly helpful to the general student: T. W. ALLEN: Homer: Origins and Transmissions, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1924. S. E. BASSETT: The Poetry ofHomer, Berkeley, University ofCalifornia Press, 1938. C. M. BOWRA: Tradition and Design in the Iliad, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1930. From Virgil to Milton, London, Macmillan, 1945. RHYS CARPENTER: Folk Tale, Fiction, and Saga in the Homeric Epics, Berkeley and Los Angeles, University of California Press, 1946.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsetter Studies at Athens Summer1984
    American School of Classical Newsetter Studies at Athens Summer1984 80th Birthday Party for Sterling Dow On January 17, 1984, friends and former students of Sterling Dow gathered at the Tavern Club in Boston to celebrate his 80th birthday. Before the cocktail hour, Dow gave a lecture on Homer relating mainly to the authorship of the Odyssey. In part the an­ swer to the question was determined on the basis of the extent of Homer's knowl­ edge. To suggest the range of that knowl­ edge, Dow produced the skull of a horse, demonstrating persuasively that there is an opening, precisely where Homer said it was, through which an arrow could have entered the brain of Nestor's horse in Book VIII of the Iliad. •struck at the point of the head, where the utmost hairs of horses are grown along the skull, and which is a place most mortal," (R. Lattimore trans.). During cocktails (including ouzo!), Dow received a telephone call from an octet of well-wishers in Athens. A large Greek goat-bell summoned the company up to dinner, where their teacher presented his Sterling Dow with two of his former students, Hunter Lewis and Jim McCredie Ph.D.'s with gold-plated replicas of the Vapheio cups. After dinner, there were speeches by structive, effective giant, initiating or sup­ Doreen C. Spitzer on behalf of the Trust­ porting creative and positive projects, al­ ees; James R. McCredie, a former Dow stu­ ways four-square and honest, always dent, for the Managing Committee; Emily thoughtful and outspoken.· William T.
    [Show full text]