The Last of the Unjust a Film by Claude LANZMANN

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Last of the Unjust a Film by Claude LANZMANN SYNECDOCHE and LE PACTE present THE LAST OF THE UNJUST A FILM BY CLAUDE LANZMANN SYNECDOCHE and LE PACTE present THE LAST OF THE UNJUST A FILM BY CLAUDE LANZMANN 2013 - France/Austria – 218 minutes - 1.85 - 5.1 INTERNATIONAL SALES INTERNATIONAL PRESS RICHARD LORMAND - FILM PRESS PLUS www.FilmPressPlus.com 5, rue Darcet - 75017 Paris [email protected] Tel. : + 33 (0)1 44 69 59 59 Tel. : +33 9 7044 9865 / +33 6 2424 1654 Fax : + 33 (0)1 44 69 59 42 www.le-pacte.com Press kit and materials can be downloaded from www.le-pacte.com SYNOPSIS 1975. In Rome, Claude Lanzmann filmed Benjamin Murmelstein, the last President of the Jewish Council in the Theresienstadt ghetto, the only “Elder of the Jews”* not to have been killed during the war. A rabbi in Vienna, following the annexation of Austria by Germany in 1938, Murmelstein fought bitterly with Adolf Eichmann, week after week for seven years, managing to help around 121,000 Jews leave the country, and preventing the liquidation of the ghetto. 2012. Claude Lanzmann, at 87 – without masking anything of the passage of time on men, but showing the incredible permanence of the locations – exhumes these interviews shot in Rome, returning to Theresienstadt, the town “given to the Jews by Hitler”, a so-called “model ghetto”, but a ghetto of deceit chosen by Adolf Eichmann to dupe the world. We discover the extraordinary personality of Benjamin Murmelstein: a man blessed with a dazzling intelligence and a true courage, which, along with an unrivaled memory, makes him a wonderfully wry, sardonic and authentic storyteller. Through these three periods, from Nisko in Poland to Theresienstadt, and from Vienna to Rome, the film provides an unprecedented insight into the genesis of the Final Solution. It reveals the true face of Eichmann, and exposes without artifice the savage contradictions of the Jewish Councils. *according to Nazi terminology Rabbi Benjamin Murmelstein was the last Chairman of the Theresienstadt Judenrat (Jewish Council). I filmed him during a whole week in Rome in 1975. In my eyes, the case of Theresienstadt was capital, both lateral and central, in the genesis and process of the Final Solution. These long hours of interviews, rich in firsthand revelations, have never ceased to dwell in my mind and haunt me. I knew that I was the custodian of something unique but backed away from the difficulties of constructing such a film. It took me a long time to accept that I had no right to keep it to myself. Some 60 kilometers northwest of Prague, Theresienstadt, a fortress town built at the end of the 18th century by Emperor Joseph II and named after his mother, Marie-Theresa of Austria, had been picked by the Nazis as the site of what Adolf Eichmann himself called a “model ghetto”, a show ghetto. In March 1939, one year after the annexation of Austria (the Anschluss), Germany dismantled the Czechoslovakian Republic, replacing it with the puppet state of Slovakia and the Protectorate of Bohemian Moravia (the Hitlerian name for the Czech Republic). The decision to create the Theresienstadt ghetto was taken in September 1941. As the Nazis had done in all the ghettos in Poland since October 1939, they formed a Jewish Council, composed of twelve members and an Elder, called the Judenälteste, or “the Elder of the Jews” in their vocabulary of contempt and fear with its tribal connotations. In Theresienstadt, during the ghetto’s four years of existence, there were successively three Jewish Elders. The first, Jacob Edelstein, was a Zionist from Prague who cherished youth. After two years of Nazi hell, in which everything, absolutely everything, was forbidden to the Jews, he welcomed the birth of Theresienstadt with blind optimism, hoping that the difficult life that awaited them there would prepare them for their future settlement in Palestine. The Nazis arrested him in November 1943, deported him to Auschwitz, and killed him six months later with a bullet in the back of his head – Genickschuss –, after murdering his wife and son before his eyes in the same manner. The second Elder was Paul Eppstein. He was from Berlin and was also killed by a bullet in the back of his head in Theresienstadt itself on 27 September 1944. Benjamin Murmelstein, the third and therefore final Elder, a rabbi from Vienna, and deputy to Josef Löwenherz who presided over the Jewish community in the Austrian capital, was named Elder in December 1944. Murmelstein had a striking appearance and was brilliantly intelligent, the cleverest of the three and perhaps the most courageous. Unlike Jacob Edelstein, he could not bear the suffering of the elderly. Although he succeeded in keeping the ghetto going until the final days of the war and saved the population from the death marches ordered by Hitler, the hatred of some of the survivors came to be focused upon him. Holder of a diplomatic passport from the International Committee of the Red Cross, he could easily have fled. He refused, preferring to be arrested and imprisoned by the Czech authorities after a number of Jews accused him of collaborating with the enemy. He spent eighteen months in prison before being acquitted of all charges. He went into exile in Rome, where he lived a harsh life. He never went to Israel, despite his deep desire to do so and his pure love for that land. All the Jewish Elders met a tragic end: Parnass from Lvov (renamed Lemberg by the Germans); Adam Czerniakow from Warsaw, who committed suicide when the deportations to Treblinka began; Gens from Vilna; and Chaim Rumkowski, from Lodz, who, carried away by what he imagined was his power, went by the name of “King Chaim” and who had coins minted with his effigy. He managed to keep the Lodz ghetto going longer than any other, until the Germans brutally liquidated it, whilst condemning its “king” to the cruelest of ends, mocking his death in Auschwitz. Benjamin Murmelstein is the only Jewish Council Elder who survived the war, making his testimony infinitely precious. He does not lie; he is ironic, sardonic, harsh with others and with himself. Thinking of the title of André Schwarz-Bart’s masterpiece, The Last of the Just, he calls himself “The Last of the Unjust”. He thus gave this film its title. Before our interviews in 1975, he had written a book in Italian called Terezin, il ghetto modello di Eichmann, published in 1961. The tone of the book and that of the interviews are very different. The book describes the victims and their awful suffering with fraternal compassion and a real gift for writing, whilst in the interviews, Murmelstein instead presents his own defense. When I first quote him in the film, the year is 1942, with the arrival of a «transport» of German Jews from Hamburg, the Nazis having decided to make Germany Judenrein (purged of its Jews) and to deport the last Prominenten – the prominent – and those whose status had, until then, allowed them to remain in their homes, albeit in terrible conditions, to Theresienstadt. But, since 1941, Theresienstadt had above all been populated by Czech and Austrian Jews. Thanks to the former, members of the technical office responsible for developing construction plans, outstanding designers, we have an extraordinary collection of works of art that reveal what real life was like in the «model ghetto»: built to house 7,000 soldiers at the most, Theresienstadt took in 50,000 Jews during its peak periods. Most of these artists of genius, who got up in the middle of the night to secretly complete works that they interred deep underground, were murdered in the gas chambers of the death camps. But their names are forever inscribed in our memories, along with those of the great musicians, actors, writers and directors who went through Theresienstadt before dying farther east. One final word: instructed by Eichmann in Vienna to organize the forced emigration of the Jews of Austria from summer 1938 until the outbreak of war, Benjamin Murmelstein fought relentlessly to help more than 120,000 flee the country. CLAUDE LANZMANN INTERVIEW WITH CLAUDE LANZMANN At what point did you think of dedicating a film to the ambiguous figure of Benjamin Murmelstein, former President of the Jewish Council of Theresienstadt in Czechoslovakia, until now often considered a collaborator ? You had a very long interview with him during the filming of SHOAH, in Rome in 1975 – why didn’t you use the footage then ? SHOAH is an epic film, and the overall tone is of unremitting tragedy. When you listen to Benjamin Murmelstein, you see that it doesn’t fit with that; it’s in another register. That said, he was the first protagonist I had filmed. It had been very difficult for me to organize a meeting with him. It was my wife at the time, the German writer Angelika Schrobsdorff – said to be the most beautiful woman in Germany – who convinced him, because he liked women. From Jerusalem, we had arrived in Rome with some very sophisticated camera and sound equipment, but as soon as we arrived, our minibus was completely ransacked by an organized Italian gang. We had to rush in some more equipment from Paris. That incident left me a bit stunned, but we still filmed for a whole week with him. It had been so difficult to make SHOAH the wayI did it, without commentary – the construction of the film itself generating its own intelligibility – that if I had included an episode like that, the film would have lasted 20 hours ! So I decided to deal with it later, but I put it off for a long time.
Recommended publications
  • Theresienstadt Concentration Camp from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Coordinates: 50°30′48″N 14°10′1″E
    Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Theresienstadt concentration camp From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Coordinates: 50°30′48″N 14°10′1″E "Theresienstadt" redirects here. For the town, see Terezín. Navigation Theresienstadt concentration camp, also referred to as Theresienstadt Ghetto,[1][2] Main page [3] was established by the SS during World War II in the fortress and garrison city of Contents Terezín (German name Theresienstadt), located in what is now the Czech Republic. Featured content During World War II it served as a Nazi concentration camp staffed by German Nazi Current events guards. Random article Tens of thousands of people died there, some killed outright and others dying from Donate to Wikipedia malnutrition and disease. More than 150,000 other persons (including tens of thousands of children) were held there for months or years, before being sent by rail Interaction transports to their deaths at Treblinka and Auschwitz extermination camps in occupied [4] Help Poland, as well as to smaller camps elsewhere. About Wikipedia Contents Community portal Recent changes 1 History The Small Fortress (2005) Contact Wikipedia 2 Main fortress 3 Command and control authority 4 Internal organization Toolbox 5 Industrial labor What links here 6 Western European Jews arrive at camp Related changes 7 Improvements made by inmates Upload file 8 Unequal treatment of prisoners Special pages 9 Final months at the camp in 1945 Permanent link 10 Postwar Location of the concentration camp in 11 Cultural activities and
    [Show full text]
  • La Place De L'helvète : Considérations Sur Un Vivant Qui Passe
    RubriqueUn vivant cinéma qui suissepasse 77 Un vivant qui passe La place de l’Helvète : Considérations sur Un vivant qui passe 1 Le cinéma « alternatif » Spoutnik, à Genève, l’a montré en septembre 2001. par Alain Freudiger 2 Cette phrase d’un discours de Jean-Pascal Delamuraz, alors président de la Confédéra- tion, prononcée en 199 avait été relevée par l’écrivain Adolf Muschg dans un essai intitulé « Wenn Auschwitz in der Schweiz liegt », paru en Réalisé par Claude Lanzmann en 1997, Un vivant qui passe n’a jamais été français peu après. Voir Adolf Muschg, Cinq dis- 1 cours d’un Suisse à sa nation qui n’en est pas projeté en Suisse – à une exception notable . Cela est d’autant plus sur- une, Ed. Zoé, Genève, 199. prenant que, outre l’importance majeure de Lanzmann comme réalisa- 3 « Dr Rossel : mais ils avaient l’impression de teur depuis Shoah (1985), ce film touche à des questions particulièrement faire quelque chose d’utile. C’est l’impression cruciales pour la Suisse : la neutralité, la Croix Rouge, l’humanitaire, la que ça donnait, parce que, si on leur parlait des non-implication… Il est possible que personne n’ait souhaité program- camps, des prisonniers, des détenus, quoi, et des choses comme ça, ils disaient : ‹ Oui, mais mer ce film à sa sortie, puisque la Suisse était alors empêtrée dans la crise enfin, l’Allemagne fait maintenant, ici, un travail des fonds en déshérence. Pourtant, il constitue une excellente réponse invraisemblable, extraordinaire, dont toute l’Eu- rope nous sera reconnaissante. › » Claude Lanz- au trop fameux « Auschwitz, ce n’est quand même pas en Suisse ! » de mann, Un vivant qui passe.
    [Show full text]
  • USHMM Finding
    http://collections.ushmm.org Contact [email protected] for further information about this collection RG-50.862: EHRLICH COLLECTION - SUMMARY NOTES OF AUDIO FILES Introductory note by Anatol Steck, Project Director in the International Archival Programs Division of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: These summary transcription notes of the digitized interviews recorded by Leonard and Edith Ehrlich in the 1970s as part of their research for their manuscript about the Jewish community leadership in Vienna and Theresienstadt during the Holocaust titled "Choices under Duress" are a work in progress. The project started in April 2016 and is ongoing. The summary notes are being typed while listening to the recordings in real time; this requires simultaneous translation as many of the interviews are in German, often using Viennese vernacular and/or Yiddish terms (especially in the case of the lengthy interview with Benjamin Murmelstein which the Ehrlichs recorded with Mr. and Mrs. Murmelstein over several days in their apartment in Rome and which constitutes a major part of this collection). The summary notes are intended as a tool and a finding aid for the researcher; researchers are strongly encouraged to consult the digitized recordings for accuracy and authenticity and not to rely solely on the summary notes. As much as possible, persons mentioned by name in the interviews are identified and described in the text; however, as persons are often referred to in the interviews only by last name, their identification is sometimes based on the context in which their names appear within the interview (especially in cases where different persons share the same last name).
    [Show full text]
  • „Das Gesundheitswesen Im Ghetto Theresienstadt“ 1941 – 1945
    Diplomarbeit Titel der Diplomarbeit „Das Gesundheitswesen im Ghetto Theresienstadt“ 1941 – 1945 Verfasser Wolfgang Schellenbacher angestrebter akademischer Grad Magister der Philosophie (Mag. Phil.) Wien, 2010 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt A 312 Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt Geschichte Betreuerin: Univ.-Doz. Dr. Brigitte Bailer 1 Index 1. Einleitung ............................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Aufbau der Arbeit ........................................................................................................................ 5 1.2 Quellenlage und Forschungsstand............................................................................................ 6 1.2.1 Literatur zur Ghettoselbstverwaltung............................................................................................12 2. Geschichte Theresienstadts...............................................................................................14 2.1 Planungen zur Errichtung des Ghettos Theresienstadt.....................................................14 2.2 Exkurs: Die Festung Theresienstadt ......................................................................................16 2.3 Sammel- und Durchgangslager für Juden aus dem „Protektorat“ (November 1941 bis Juni 1942)............................................................................................................................................18 2.4 Altersghetto..................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Der Zug in Die Freiheit
    Der Zug in die Freiheit Das Schicksal jüdischer Gefangener aus dem KZ Theresienstadt und ihr Auf- enthalt im Hadwig-Schulhaus in St. Gallen im Februar 1945 Eine Untersuchung von Einzelfällen und die Darstellung individueller Schicksale auf der Grundlage von Zeitzeugengesprächen und Quellenanalysen Masterarbeit Verfasserin: Catrina Schmid Feldweg 5 7324 Vilters +41 79 636 56 26 eingereicht am 24. August 2017 Betreuung: Co-Betreuung: Prof. Johannes Gunzenreiner Prof. Dr. Claudio Stucky Seminarstrasse 7 Seminarstrasse 27 9200 Gossau 9400 Rorschach [email protected] [email protected] Masterarbeit: Der Zug in die Freiheit Vorwort Die vorliegende Masterarbeit mit dem Namen „Der Zug in die Freiheit“ ist das Resultat mei- ner Untersuchungen und Recherchen im Zeitraum von Dezember 2015 bis Sommer 2017. Sie bildet den Abschluss meiner Ausbildung zur Oberstufenlehrperson an der Pädagogi- schen Hochschule in St. Gallen. Als ich ein Thema für meine Masterarbeit suchte, war für mich klar, dass ich ein Thema aus dem Fachbereich Geschichte, bzw. ein Thema aus dem Zweiten Weltkrieg untersuchen möchte. Von Mai bis September 2015 fand in unserem Hochschulgebäude Hadwig in St. Gallen eine Ausstellung über die Theresienstadt-Flüchtlinge statt. Die Ausstellung über die Flüchtlinge weckte mein Interesse. Der Vorschlag meiner Betreuungsperson, als Thema die Erinnerung der St. Galler Bevölkerung an die Flüchtlinge im Hadwig zu nehmen, sprach mich sofort an. Diese Arbeit richtet sich an ein Publikum, welches ein grundlegendes Wissen über den Ver- lauf des Zweiten Weltkrieges und den damit verbundenen Nationalsozialismus besitzt. Für die grossartige Unterstützung und Begleitung danke ich meinem Betreuer Prof. Johan- nes Gunzenreiner und meinem Co-Betreuer Prof. Claudio Stucky herzlich.
    [Show full text]
  • The Defense of a Jewish Collaborator by Mark Lilla | the New York
    The Defense of a Jewish Collaborator by Mark Lilla | The New... http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2013/dec/05/defense... The Defense of a Jewish Collaborator December 5, 2013 Issue Mark Lilla The Last of the Unjust a film directed by Claude Lanzmann Shown at the New York Film Festival in September; general release in February 2014 Terezin: Il ghetto-modello di Eichmann [Theresienstadt: Eichmann’s Model Ghetto] by Benjamin Murmelstein Brescia: La Scuola, 246 pp., €15.50 “Der Letzte der Ungerechten”: Der “Judenälteste” Benjamin Murmelstein in Filmen 1942–1975 [“The Last of the Unjust”: The “Jewish Head Elder” Benjamin Murmelstein in Films 1942–1975] edited by Ronny Loewy and Katharina Rauschenberger Frankfurt: Campus, 201 pp., €24.90 Cohen Media Group Claude Lanzmann and Benjamin Murmelstein, Rome, 1975; from Lanzmann’s film The Last of the Unjust 1 of 11 11/22/13 12:00 PM The Defense of a Jewish Collaborator by Mark Lilla | The New... http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2013/dec/05/defense... 1. A half-century has passed since Hannah Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem was first published. Yet somehow we can’t escape it. Even today historians of the Final Solution do battle with her misguided thesis that Adolf Eichmann, the cold-blooded engineer of the Nazi killing machine, was himself but a cog in it, a self-deceived simpleton who made evil seem banal.1 And her cavalier criticism of Jewish leaders who found themselves forced to cooperate with the Nazis in the expropriation, expulsion, internment, and even extermination of their own people still provokes outrage and rebuttals.
    [Show full text]
  • Un Vivant Qui Passe a Visitor from the Living Ein Lebender Geht Vorbei
    HOMMAGE 2013 UN VIVANT QUI PASSE A VISITOR FROM THE LIVING EIN LEBENDER GEHT VORBEI Claude Lanzmann Während des Zweiten Weltkrieges trat Dr. Maurice Rossel, Schweizer Frankreich 1997 Arzt und Offizier, im Alter von 25 Jahren in den Dienst des Internati- Länge 65 Min. · Format Digital Betacam · Farbe onalen Komitees vom Roten Kreuz (IKRK). In Deutschland eingesetzt, STABLISTE inspizierte er Kriegsgefangenen- und Arbeitslager und war dadurch Regie, Buch Claude Lanzmann auch am Austausch von Kriegsgefangenen beteiligt. 1943 fuhr er Kamera Dominique Chapuis, aus eigener Initiative, allein und unangemeldet, mit dem Auto nach William Lubtchansky Auschwitz. Er hatte die vage Idee, den Gefangenen durch die Liefe- Kameraassistenz Caroline Champetier Gallimard Hélie Foto: rung von Medikamenten helfen zu können. Ein Gespräch mit einem Ton Bernard Aubouy Schnitt Sabine Mamou Lanzmann schreibt als Journalist unter Lagerkommandanten verlief ergebnislos. 1944 war Rossel Mitglied Schnittassistenz Michaël Rosenfeld anderem für„Elle“, „france Observateur“ (Le einer Kommission des IKRK, die mit Genehmigung deutscher Stellen Regieassistenz Corinna Coulmas Nouvel Observateur) und ist als Interviewer das KZ Theresienstadt besichtigte. In diesem „Vorzeige-Getto“ nörd- für das Fernsehen tätig. Als Unterzeichner lich von Prag waren zu großen Teilen prominente oder vermögende DOKUMENTARFILM des „Manifeste des 121“, das französische Juden interniert, ehe sie in die Vernichtungslager deportiert wurden. Soldaten zur Dienstverweigerung im In seinem Bericht nannte Rossel das Lager „zufriedenstellend“. Das Ge- PRODUKTION Algerienkrieg ermutigt, wird er 1960 verhaftet spräch mit ihm führte Claude Lanzmann 1979. Weil Theresienstadt in Les Films Aleph und angeklagt. 1967 ist er Redakteur von Shoah nicht thematisiert wurde, fanden die Aufnahmen dort keine Paris, Frankreich „Le conflit israélo-arabe“, eines 1.000 Verwendung.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Dissertation Hajkova 3
    Abstract This dissertation explores the prisoner society in Terezín (Theresienstadt) ghetto, a transit ghetto in the Protectorate Bohemia and Moravia. Nazis deported here over 140, 000 Czech, German, Austrian, Dutch, Danish, Slovak, and Hungarian Jews. It was the only ghetto to last until the end of Second World War. A microhistorical approach reveals the dynamics of the inmate community, shedding light on broader issues of ethnicity, stratification, gender, and the political dimension of the “little people” shortly before they were killed. Rather than relegating Terezín to a footnote in narratives of the Holocaust or the Second World War, my work connects it to Central European, gender, and modern Jewish histories. A history of victims but also a study of an enforced Central European society in extremis, instead of defining them by the view of the perpetrators, this dissertation studies Terezín as an autarkic society. This approach is possible because the SS largely kept out of the ghetto. Terezín represents the largest sustained transnational encounter in the history of Central Europe, albeit an enforced one. Although the Nazis deported all the inmates on the basis of their alleged Jewishness, Terezín did not produce a common sense of Jewishness: the inmates were shaped by the countries they had considered home. Ethnicity defined culturally was a particularly salient means of differentiation. The dynamics connected to ethnic categorization and class formation allow a deeper understanding of cultural and national processes in Central and Western Europe in the twentieth century. The society in Terezín was simultaneously interconnected and stratified. There were no stark contradictions between the wealthy and majority of extremely poor prisoners.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcript of the Shoah Interview with Maurice Rossel Translation by Lotti Eichorn - Volunteer – Visitor Services – January to March 2009
    1 Transcript of the Shoah Interview with Maurice Rossel Translation by Lotti Eichorn - Volunteer – Visitor Services – January to March 2009 Bobine No. 125 Rossel 1 Q. Dr. Rossel, what I am really interested in this conversation with you, is – after all you are a historic personality, and you have occupied a very strategic position – to learn, as I have understood that you had been delegated by the C.I.C.R. in Germany* (*handwritten note: this is true, isn’t it) during all these years, well and, if I state that you are a historic personality, this means that everybody, there are more people today....like you, who have done what you did, having you experience and able to testify on the climate of the time...and in that context I would, for starting, question you, finally, what does it mean to be delegated from there, from the International Committee of the Red Cross, in Germany, in the middle of the war? And you were there, you had been delegated, you came to Berlin in what year? A. I came in 42. Q. 42 A. 42, yes, and, overall, you know that I was not involved in the International Red Cross as ..how can I say it, in the manner of a spokesman or the man who wants to spread the good word, I went there simply to escape the army. I was an officer in the Swiss army and we were occupying the borders, it was a horribly mindless occupation and ....I did, say anything, did whatever was needed to get away from this idiotic work and that is the whole reason why I went to work for the C.I.C.R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future Fund of the Republic of Austria Subsidizes Scientific And
    The Future Fund of the Republic of Austria subsidizes scientific and pedagogical projects which foster tolerance and mutual understanding on the basis of a close examination of the sufferings caused by the Nazi regime on the territory of present-day Austria. Keeping alive the memory of the victims as a reminder for future generations is one of our main targets, as well as human rights education and the strengthening of democratic values. Beyond, you will find a list containing the English titles or brief summaries of all projects approved by the Future Fund since its establishment in 2006. For further information in German about the content, duration and leading institutions or persons of each project, please refer to the database (menu: “Projektdatenbank”) on our homepage http://www.zukunftsfonds-austria.at If you have further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at [email protected] Project-Code P06-0001 brief summary Soviet Forced Labour Workers and their Lives after Liberation Project-Code P06-0002 brief summary Life histories of forced labour workers under the Nazi regime Project-Code P06-0003 brief summary Unbroken Will - USA - Tour 2006 (book presentations and oral history debates with Holocaust survivor Leopold Engleitner) Project-Code P06-0004 brief summary Heinrich Steinitz - Lawyer, Poet and Resistance Activist Project-Code P06-0006 brief summary Robert Quintilla: A Gaul in Danubia. Memoirs of a former French forced labourer Project-Code P06-0007 brief summary Symposium of the Jewish Museum Vilnius on their educational campaign against anti-Semitism and Austria's contribution to those efforts Project-Code P06-0008 brief summary Effective Mechanisms of Totalitarian Developments.
    [Show full text]
  • Nazi Germany and the Jews, 1933-1945
    NAZI GERMANY AND THE JEWS, 1933–1945 ABRIDGED EDITION SAUL FRIEDLÄNDER Abridged by Orna Kenan To Una CONTENTS Foreword v Acknowledgments xiii Maps xv PART ONE : PERSECUTION (January 1933–August 1939) 1. Into the Third Reich: January 1933– December 1933 3 2. The Spirit of the Laws: January 1934– February 1936 32 3. Ideology and Card Index: March 1936– March 1938 61 4. Radicalization: March 1938–November 1938 87 5. A Broken Remnant: November 1938– September 1939 111 PART TWO : TERROR (September 1939–December 1941) 6. Poland Under German Rule: September 1939– April 1940 143 7. A New European Order: May 1940– December 1940 171 iv CONTENTS 8. A Tightening Noose: December 1940–June 1941 200 9. The Eastern Onslaught: June 1941– September 1941 229 10. The “Final Solution”: September 1941– December 1941 259 PART THREE : SHOAH (January 1942–May 1945) 11. Total Extermination: January 1942–June 1942 287 12. Total Extermination: July 1942–March 1943 316 13. Total Extermination: March 1943–October 1943 345 14. Total Extermination: Fall 1943–Spring 1944 374 15. The End: March 1944–May 1945 395 Notes 423 Selected Bibliography 449 Index 457 About the Author About the Abridger Other Books by Saul Friedlander Credits Cover Copyright About the Publisher FOREWORD his abridged edition of Saul Friedländer’s two volume his- Ttory of Nazi Germany and the Jews is not meant to replace the original. Ideally it should encourage its readers to turn to the full-fledged version with its wealth of details and interpre- tive nuances, which of necessity could not be rendered here.
    [Show full text]
  • Benjamin Murmelstein, a Man from the “Town 'As If'”: a Discussion Of
    Holocaust Studies A Journal of Culture and History ISSN: 1750-4902 (Print) 2048-4887 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rhos20 Benjamin Murmelstein, a man from the “Town ‘as if’”: a discussion of Claude Lanzmann’s film The Last of the Unjust (France/Austria, 2013) Yvonne Kozlovsky Golan To cite this article: Yvonne Kozlovsky Golan (2017): Benjamin Murmelstein, a man from the “Town ‘as if’”: a discussion of Claude Lanzmann’s film The Last of the Unjust (France/Austria, 2013), Holocaust Studies To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17504902.2017.1287463 Published online: 03 Mar 2017. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rhos20 Download by: [2.217.59.201] Date: 04 March 2017, At: 04:19 HOLOCAUST STUDIES, 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17504902.2017.1287463 Benjamin Murmelstein, a man from the “Town ‘as if’”:a discussion of Claude Lanzmann’s film The Last of the Unjust (France/Austria, 2013)† Yvonne Kozlovsky Golan Graduate program for Culture and Film Studies, Humanities Faculty, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel ABSTRACT KEYWORDS Claude Lanzmann’s film The Last of the Just (2013) presents the Judenrat; Lanzmann; director’s extended interview with Rabbi Dr. Benjamin Murmelstein Eichmann; Murmelstein, the only survivor of the Jewish Council of the Elders Theresienstadt of Theresienstadt. Lanzmann had shelved his1975 footage until 2013 for perspective, and now supplemented it with historical material and filmed sequences of the landscapes of “Ghetto Terezin,” Vienna and other locations.
    [Show full text]