Nmiotc in Support to Regional Capacity Building in Africa

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nmiotc in Support to Regional Capacity Building in Africa Issue 6 December 2012 ISSN:2241-438X L L A A N N O O I I MMaarrii//mmee IInntteerrddiicc//oonn OOppeerraa//oonnss jjoouurrnnaall T T nmio tc A A R R E E P P O O E E N N R R O O T T I I N N T T E E C C C I C I D D G G R R N N E I E I T N T N I I N N I A I A R R E E T T M M I I T T I I R R A A M M O O NNMMIIOOTTCC iinn SSuuppppoorrtt ttoo T T A A N N RReeggiioonnaall CCaappaacciittyy BBuuiillddiinngg NMIOTC MIO JOURNAL PUBLISHER NMIOTC Souda Bay, Crete Zip 73200, Greece Telephone:2821085716 DIRECTOR Commodore I. Pavlopoulos GRC N CONTENTS Commandant NMIOTC EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 4 COMMANDANT’S EDITORIAL Cdr G. Tedeschini ITA N by Commodore Ioannis Pavlopoulos GRC N Director of Transformation 11 VIP VISITS GALERY JOURNAL MANAGER Cdr. K. Sampanis GRC N 14 NMIOTC IN SUPPORT TO REGIONAL CAPACITY BUILDING IN AFRICA EDITOR 16 FROM MILITARY INTERVENTION TO JUDICIAL Lt Cdr G.Mantzouris GRC N PROSECUTION: BRIDGING THE GAP ASSISTANT EDITOR by Prof Henri Fouché LtCdr N. Ariatzis GRC N 26 WHAT IS THE NATO MARITIME C-IED Lt G. Georgiev BGR N INITIATIVE? WEB EDITOR By CDR Raymond Albarado, NATO ACT C-IED IPT CPO K. Boutsifakou GRC N 32 “MIO IN AN ERA OF CONVERGING – DIVERGING ADMINISTRATION AND MARITIME SECURITY OPERATIONS” DISTRIBUTION By Erik Sandahl, NATO HQ/Operations Division ENS K. Papanastasis GRC N 35 IS MARITIME SECURITY A WICKED PROBLEM? EDITORIAL BOARD by Dr. Alec Coutroubis and George Kiourktsoglou , PhD candidate Dr. Alex Bordetsky Dr Marios Efthymiopoulos 40 AD-HOC SENSOR NETWORKS FOR MARITIME Dr Joship Kasum INTERDICTION OPERATIONS AND REGIONAL Dr P. Michalas SECURITY Dr S. Desautel by LT Theofanis Kontogiannis Professor I. Koukos Professor G. Tsialtas 49 NATO AND IMO WORK TOGETHER TO BUILD Professor N. Nikitakos REGIONAL CAPACITY TO COUNTER-PIRACY: JOINT Professor F. Papoulias NATIONAL TRAINING FOR BOARDING TEAMS FROM COLUMNISTS DJIBOUTI CODE OF CONDUCT REGION Capt M. Holub CZE A by Mr Osamu Marumoto, IMO Project Officer (Operations) Lt G. Georgiev BGR N 52 THE FRIGATE ROS REGELE FERDINAND IN CONTRIBUTORS SOUDA BAY, CRETE Professor Henry Fouche by LtCdr Mihai Egorov ROU (N) Dr A. Coutroubis Mr. Erik Sandahl Mr. George Kiourktsoglou Cdr Raymond Albarado USA N LtCdr Mihal Egorov ROU N 2 Issue 6, December 2012 The NMIOTC MIO Journal is a professional publication of NATO Maritime Interdiction Operational Training Center, aiming to serve as a forum for the presentation and stimulation of innova - tive thinking on NATO Maritime Interdiction related issues such as doctrine, concepts, force structure, employment and readiness. The views and opinions expressed or implied in the NMIOTC MIO Journal are those of the authors and should not be construed as carrying the official sanction of NATO. The NMIOTC MIO Journal is open to receive and publish articles at [email protected] . We reserve the right to make editorial changes. All articles within this issue not bearing a copyright notice ( ©), may be reproduced in whole or in part without further permission. Articles bearing a copyright notice ( ©) may be reproduced for any NATO purpose but without permission. If an article is being reproduced, the NMIOTC MIO Journal re - quests a courtesy line. To obtain permission for the reproduction of material bearing a copyright notice (©) for other than NATO purposes, please contact the author of the material rather than the NMIOTC MIO Journal. Issue 6, December 2012 3 >>> Commandant’s Editorial NMIOTC Journal COMMANDANT’’S EDITORIAL by Commodore Ioannis Pavlopoulos GRC N NMIOTC’s MISSION To conduct the combined training necessary ffor NATO fforces to better execute surfface,, sub- surfface, aeriial surveiilllance,, and speciall operatiions activiities in support off Mariitime Interdic- tiion Operations. NMIOTC Commandant’’s Vision Enhance Mariitime Security through MIO Training and remain Alllliiance’s crediible MIO expert.. Economic recession, uncertainty, low optimism, more specific basis NMIOTC is the only NATO illegal trafficking, maritime acts of terrorism, piracy, accredited maritime training facility that provides illegal flow of weapons and weapons of mass practical and useful products setting up the acceptable destruction and generally all forms of terrorism, are only NATO standards for participating in maritime some of the threats our contemporary society is facing. operations combating all types of illegal activities that Daily there are more and more governmental and an individual or a naval unit can meet in the sea. Of scientific / academic voices that ring the bell and express course, it is not worthy to mention that all of our their concern that the cohesion of our society is not as activities are being in close cooperation and by receiving healthy as it was in the past. guidelines from our Superior Commands, which in our case is Allied Command Transformation in Norfolk. On the contrary, another great number of experts Not to mention that NMIOTC has close cooperation believe that we now more than ever have the links with all of NATO’s critical maritime components mechanisms to control and effectively use our powers and operational commands such as SHAPE, MCC in order to efficiently spot illegal acts and restrict all Northwood and MCC Naples in order to receive up to those actions that tend to deorbit our society’s focus date operational requirements and provide to the from going towards a security framework. This approach students a most effective and efficient type of training has also become a tradition, specificaly, now having in that they could finally implement in an operational mind that our well- formed international institutions and environment. Generally, NMIOTC’s training is based on organizations have acquired and already implement the standards of pre-deployment training for operations, idea of confronting any illegal action for the sake of the executing mission rehearsal exercises that finally deliver common benefit. NATO, EU, UN and other well to the trainees a firsthand approach to the way NATO renowned organizations have made significant steps operations are being executed before they actually towards this direction and have altered dramatically the participate in the operation itself. A perfect example of way that our society responds to any illegal and that is the final tactical exercises that take place in our underground activity that takes place not only nationally training products, such as those conducted by the Dutch, or trans - continentally, but also on a global bases. A UK and the US Navy, as well as other teams that are shining example of that is how international coalition being trained in our center. forces are countering piracy and how modern network- based operations among different nations help Another important area of our activities that has centralized international command centers to take become a trend in the last two years is the increased decisions that affect positively the way of executing our participation of specialized teams benefit from our daily maritime business. advanced training products. These trainings seems to overwhelm our framework, especially in the last year, NATO Maritime Interdiction Operational Training where numerous highly specialized teams from different Center (NMIOTC), from its own operational post and countries have participated asking for more demanding being an active subset of NATO, supports the above training products, such as “Opposed Boarding” or idea and effectively contributes to this direction focusing “Detainee” operations. This fact proves that NMIOTC’s specifically on how training and transformational efforts training standards attract even highly specialized can bring a halt to current maritime illegal acts. On a personnel, and for us this is an honor as well as an 4 Issue 6, December 2012 NMIOTC Journal Commandant’s Editorial <<< opportunity to strengthen our instructional training • Border security, material and exchange valuable knowledge that could • MIO – NEO (Non Combatant Evacuation further enhance our initiatives and at the same time set Operations) linkages, NMIOTC as a primary training hub for pre-deployment preparation to maritime security related operations. • Support to real operations at an advisory role, At this point and taking into account that NMIOTC • Creation of a NATO MIO related exercise in counts only four years of functional operational the Eastern Mediterranean area where NMIOTC will capability, it is worth mentioning that our “customers” have a leading training and operational role, are mainly coming from NATO countries (82% • Increase of bilateral coordination among the representation in training are trainees from NATO Center and organizations / countries that lie outside the members states). The total number of students is scope of NMIOTC’s MOU, approximately 3.300; as for naval units 123 of them have berthed and received training in Souda bay Crete. A • Creation of a Knowledge Management crucial characteristic to refer to is that this last year there Database in order to increase research activities in has been an increase in the total training days that these NMIOTC, trainees choose to participate in NMIOTC. During • Creation of an academic board of directors for previous years the average was 3.3 days per unit or team bringing universities into the challenging maritime or individual, this year, however, even though there is an security and interdiction environment, especially after apparent global economic crisis, this number has the completion of the ACT Quality Assurance cycle, increased to 5.5 training days in NMIOTC. This apparently means that a student now remains and • Increase cooperation and coordination with receives training 30% more time than in the previous Global Maritime Lessons Learned Centers for acquiring academic years. Moreover greater quality has now access and analyze issues on a broader perspective, become a main objective for NMIOTC.
Recommended publications
  • What We Know About Piracy
    WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT PIRACY WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT PIRACY Author: Lydelle Joubert May 2020 http://dx.doi.org/10.18289/OEF.2020.046 Design and layout by Liz Allen, One Earth Future. Cover Image: HMS Monmouth’s Boarding Team Approach a Dhow in the Arabian Gulf. Photo: Will Haigh, Defence Images. FOREWORD What We Know About Piracy is the outcome of a collaboration between the SafeSeas Network, based at the Universities of Bristol (UK) and Copenhagen (Denmark) and the Stable Seas programme of the One Earth Future Foundation. The report provides a comprehensive overview of the data available on piracy, drawing on desk-based research conducted between June 2019 and March 2020. It is the first of three reports and will be followed by similar data overviews on smuggling at sea and on maritime environmental crimes. The research forms part of the research project Transnational Organised Crime at Sea: New Evidence for Better Responses, funded by the UK Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) as part of UK Research and Innovation’s (UKRI) Partnership for Conflict, Crime and Security Research (PaCCS) (Award Number: ES/S008810/1). Additional funding for the work was provided by the One Earth Future Foundation. Further information on the project is available at www.safeseas.net. The report was authored by Lydelle Joubert (Stable Seas). Input and comments on earlier drafts were provided by Dr Curits Bell (Stable Seas), Professor Tim Edmunds (SafeSeas/University of Bristol), Dr Scott Edwards (SafeSeas/University of Bristol), and Professor Christian Bueger (SafeSeas/University of Copenhagen). TABLE OF CONTENTS I.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy News Week 47-1
    NAVY NEWS WEEK 47-1 26 November 2017 Yemen’s Houthis threaten to attack warships, oil tankers if ports stay closed Yemen’s armed Houthi movement said on Sunday it could attack warships and oil tankers from enemy countries in retaliation against the closure of Yemeni ports by a Saudi-led military coalition last week Saudi Arabia has blamed the Iran- allied Houthis for firing a ballistic missile towards Riyadh airport on Nov 4. Two days later, the Saudi-led coalition responded by closing access to Yemeni ports, saying this was needed to stop arms reaching the Houthis. The United Nations says the closure could cause a famine in Yemen that could kill millions of people if ports are not reopened. “The battleships and oil tankers of the aggression and their movements will not be safe from the fire of Yemeni naval forces if they are directed by the senior leadership (to attack),” the Houthis’ official media outlet Al Masirah said on its website, citing a military commander. Yemen lies beside the southern mouth of the Red Sea, one of the most important trade routes in the world for oil tankers, which pass near Yemen’s shores while heading from the Middle East through the Suez Canal to Europe. The Houthis, fighters drawn mainly from Yemen’s Zaidi Shi‘ite minority and allied to long-serving former president Ali Abdullah Saleh, control much of Yemen including the capital San‘aa. The Saudi-led military alliance is fighting in support of the internationally recognised government of President Abd-Rabbu Mansour Hadi, who is based in the southern port of Aden.
    [Show full text]
  • Colours of the Fleet
    THE COLOURS OF THE FLEET TCOF BRITISH & BRITISH DERIVED ENSIGNS ~ THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE WORLDWIDE LIST OF ALL FLAGS AND ENSIGNS, PAST AND PRESENT, WHICH BEAR THE UNION FLAG IN THE CANTON “Build up the highway clear it of stones lift up an ensign over the peoples” Isaiah 62 vv 10 Created and compiled by Malcolm Farrow OBE (President of the Flag Institute) Mostly in the early 1990s Edited and updated by David Prothero Mostly between 2005 -2015 (with minor amendments by MF in 2020) 1 © CONTENTS Chapter 1 Page 3 Introduction Page 5 Definition of an Ensign Page 6 The Development of Modern Ensigns Page 10 Union Flags, Flagstaffs and Crowns Page 13 A Brief Summary Page 13 Reference Sources Page 14 Chronology Page 17 Numerical Summary of Ensigns Chapter 2 British Ensigns and Related Flags in Current Use Page 18 White Ensigns Page 25 Blue Ensigns Page 38 Red Ensigns Page 43 Sky Blue Ensigns Page 44 Ensigns of Other Colours Page 46 Old Flags in Current Use Chapter 3 Special Ensigns of Yacht Clubs and Sailing Associations Page 48 Introduction Page 50 Current Page 62 Obsolete Chapter 4 Obsolete Ensigns and Related Flags Page 69 British Isles Page 83 Commonwealth and Empire Page 113 Unidentified Flags Page 113 Hypothetical Flags Chapter 5 Exclusions. Page 115 Flags similar to Ensigns and Unofficial Ensigns Chapter 6 Proclamations Page 122 A Proclamation Amending Proclamation dated 1st January 1801 declaring what Ensign or Colours shall be borne at sea by Merchant Ships. Page 123 Proclamation dated January 1, 1801 declaring what ensign or colours shall be borne at sea by merchant ships.
    [Show full text]
  • TASK FORCE 2012 the Challenge of Piracy Off the Horn of Africa
    TASK FORCE 2012 The Challenge of Piracy off the Horn of Africa University of Washington | Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies Cover Photograph: A member of the HMS MONMOUTH force protection team providing cover during the boarding of the merchant vessel MV CARAVOS HORIZON. Image used in accordance with UK’s Crown Copyright regulations. Image captured 08/12/2011 by LA(Phot) Stuart Hill / MOD - Crown Copyright. Retrieved from www.combinedmaritimeforces.com. All trademarks mentioned in this report remain the property of their owners. Th eir inclusion in this report should in no way be taken as an endorsement of this report or its conclusions by the trademark owners. All maps included in this report were created by the Task Force, based off the open source Wikimedia Commons World Map “BlankMap-World6.svg” dated 14 February 2012. Printed at the University of Washington in Seattle ii The Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies University of Washington, Seattle Task Force Report 2012 Th e Challenge of Piracy off the Horn of Africa: U.S. Policy in Dealing With Criminal Elements and Dangerous Non-State Actors Faculty Advisor: Frederick Michael Lorenz, JD, LLM Senior Lecturer, Jackson School of International Studies University of Washington, Seattle Evaluator: Donna L. Hopkins Coordinator for Counter Piracy and Maritime Security, Bureau of Political Military Aff airs U.S. Department of State Task Force: Natalie Block (Editor) H. Jacqueline Brehmer Ashley Bullock Steven Chang Brittany Davis-Roberti Karl Eckhardt Luke Eden Zachary Gerber Lauren Graves David La Boon Seung Hee Lee Erika Maskal (Editor) Emily Stromme Nacha [Poi] Udomsrirungruang Andrijana Valladares Jeff Wheeler Report designed by Luke Eden.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Navy Matters 2011
    ROYAL NAVY MATTERS MATTERS NAVY ROYAL ROYAL NAVY BROADSHEET 2011 MATTERS BROADSHEET 2011 FINAL PROOF FINAL PROOF ROYAL NAVY MATTERS Editors © 2011. The entire contents of this publication are protected by copyright. Pauline Aquilina All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, Simon Michell stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means: electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without Editor-in-chief the prior permission of the publisher. The views and opinions expressed Colette Doyle by independent authors and contributors in this publication are provided in the writers’ personal capacities and are their sole responsibility. Their Chief sub-editor publication does not imply that they represent the views or opinions Barry Davies of the Royal Navy or Newsdesk Communications Ltd and must neither be regarded as constituting advice on any matter whatsoever, nor be Sub-editors interpreted as such. The reproduction of advertisements in this publication Clare Cronin does not in any way imply endorsement by the Royal Navy or Newsdesk Michael Davis Communications Ltd of products or services referred to therein. Art editors Jean-Philippe Stanway James White Designer Kylie Alder Production and distribution manager Karen Troman Published on behalf of the Royal Navy Sales director Ministry of Defence, Main Building, Martin Cousens Whitehall, London SW1A 2HB www.royalnavy.mod.uk Sales manager, defence Peter Barron Managing director Andrew Howard Publisher and chief executive Published
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring the Fleet: Naval Procurement and the National Shipbuilding Strategy
    House of Commons Defence Committee Restoring the Fleet: Naval Procurement and the National Shipbuilding Strategy Third Report of Session 2016–17 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 15 November 2016 HC 221 Published on 21 November 2016 by authority of the House of Commons The Defence Committee The Defence Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Ministry of Defence and its associated public bodies. Current membership Dr Julian Lewis MP (Conservative, New Forest East) (Chair) Douglas Chapman MP (Scottish National Party, Dunfermline and West Fife) James Gray MP (Conservative, North Wiltshire) Jack Lopresti MP (Consevative, Filton and Bradley Stoke) Johnny Mercer MP (Conservative, Plymouth, Moor View) Mrs Madeleine Moon MP (Labour, Bridgend) Jim Shannon MP (Democratic Unionist Party, Strangford) Ruth Smeeth MP (Labour, Stoke-on-Trent North) John Spellar MP (Labour, Warley) Bob Stewart MP (Conservative, Beckenham) Phil Wilson MP (Labour, Sedgefield) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in the House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No. 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website and in print by Order of the House. Evidence relating to this Report is published on the relevant inquiry page of the Committee’s website. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are James Davies (Clerk), Dr Anna Dickson (Second Clerk), Claire Cozens, John Curtis, Eleanor Scarnell, and Ian Thomson (Committee Specialists), David Nicholas (Senior Committee Assistant), Carolyn Bowes and David Gardener (Committee Assistants).
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry of Defence Annual Report and Accounts 2014 to 2015
    Ministry of – Defence Annual Report and Accounts 2014-2015 ReportAnnual and Accounts Ministry of Defence Annual Report and Accounts 2014-2015 Ministry of Defence Annual Report and Accounts 2 014 -15 For the year ended 31 March 2015 Accounts presented to the House of Commons pursuant to section 6(4) of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000 Departmental Report presented to the House of Commons by Command of Her Majesty Annual Report and Accounts presented to the House of Lords by Command of Her Majesty Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 16 July 2015 HC 32 This is part of a series of departmental publications which, along with the Main Estimates 2015-16, the document Public Expenditure: Statistical Analyses 2015, and the Supply Estimates 2014-15: Supplementary Budgetary Information, present the Government’s outturn for 2014-15 and planned expenditure for 2015-16. © Crown copyright 2015 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London T W9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at: [email protected] Print ISBN 9781474123358
    [Show full text]
  • Refuelling the Navy's Global Reach
    April 2012 Issue 47 desthe magazine for defenceider equipment and support Refuelling the Navy’s global reach Why DE&S staff are probing a World War Two shipwreck See inside Dockyard Helmet system Look smart, Packaging up Astute’s transformation proves a hit be smart! welfare powerplay 853_teamSSAFA_RideBritain_AD_DESider.pdf 1 16/03/2012 12:45 853_teamSSAFA_RideBritain_AD_DESider.pdf 1 16/03/2012 12:45 FEATURES 17 18 Recycling closes the final chapter Recycling of the former Royal Navy aircraft carrier Invincible has been completed by the Turkish contractors inside ten months. Invincible left Portsmouth last spring for recycling by the Turkish company Leyal Ship Recycling, one of Turkey's leading ship recycling companies near Izmir on the Aegean coast 20 DE&S probes secrets of the deep Members of DE&S' Salvage and Marine Operations team will be hard at work on the island of St Helena from later this month examining the wreck of a tanker which was sunk by a German U-boat during World War Two. RFA Darkdale was Picture courtesy Services BMT Defence of the first British ship sunk south of the equator during the war as she was hit by four torpedoes in the early hours of 22 October, 1941. 22 Open procurement is the way forward The Government's White Paper in February obliges DE&S to seek out what the global market has to offer UK Forces cover image in cutting edge, high quality kit, getting the best return for 2012 Signing of the £452 million Military Afloat Reach and the UK taxpayer. But British companies should not fear this Sustainability Tanker contract has been described competition, says Minister for Defence Equipment, Support as a dream by officials of the company – Daewoo and Technology Peter Luff Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering – who will be APRIL building the ships in a yard in South Korea.
    [Show full text]
  • MOD Annual Report and Accounts 2017-18
    Ministry of Defence Ministry of Defence Annual Report and Accounts 2017-18 Annual Report 2017-18 Annual Accounts and HC 1272 Ministry of Defence Annual Report and Accounts 2017-18 For the year ended 31 March 2018 Accounts presented to the House of Commons pursuant to section 6(4) of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000 Annual Report and Accounts presented to the House of Commons by Command of Her Majesty Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 19 July 2018 HC 1272 © Crown copyright 2018 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at: [email protected] ISBN 978-1-5286-0237-2 CCS0318104056 07/18 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Contents Section Page Performance Report Overview Foreword by Secretary of State for Defence 8 Introduction from the Permanent Secretary and the Chief of Defence Staff 9 Our Vision 10 Strategic Objectives – Notable Achievements 11 Departmental Structure 12 Defence Operating Model 14 DG Finance: Financial Performance Summary 15 Performance Analysis
    [Show full text]
  • F-35 ITF Conducts First Shipborne Rolling Vertical Landing on HMS Queen Elizabeth
    F-35 ITF conducts first Shipborne Rolling Vertical Landing on HMS Queen Elizabeth Posted by TBN(Staff) On 10/15/2018 The first ever Shipborne Rolling Vertical Landing (SRVL) was carried out last week with an F-35B conducting trials onboard the new British aircraft carrier, HMS Queen Elizabeth. The UK is the only nation currently planning to use the maneuver, which will allow jets to land onboard with heavier loads, meaning they won’t need to jettison expensive fuel and weapons before landing. Previously the jets have conducted vertical landings, coming to a hover to the side of the ship, translating sideways over the deck, before gently lowering to land. It is regarded as a safer method to reduce speed before the jet lands in this way, rather than landing on at speed and coming to a stop before it runs out of deck. An SRVL uses a different approach, with the jet using a more conventional landing pattern, approaching the ship from the aft end at speed, using the thrust from the nozzle and lift created by air over the wings, to touch down and come to a stop as soon as possible. The first SRVL was conducted by Peter Wilson, a BAE Systems U.K. test pilot with the F-35 Pax River Integrated Test Force, and took place at 10:30 a.m. Oct. 13, 2018, off the east coast of the U.S. Landing 755 yards back from the end of the carrier’s ski jump, the jet came to a complete standstill at the 580 yard mark.
    [Show full text]
  • HMS Monmouth (F235) 1 HMS Monmouth (F235)
    HMS Monmouth (F235) 1 HMS Monmouth (F235) Career (UK) Name: HMS Monmouth Operator: Royal Navy Ordered: July 1988 Builder: Yarrow Shipbuilders Laid down: 1 June 1989 Launched: 23 November 1991 Commissioned: 24 September 1993 Homeport: HMNB Devonport, Plymouth Motto: 'Fear Nothing But God' [1] Nickname: "The Black Duke" Status: in active service, as of 2013[2] Badge: General characteristics Class & type: Type 23 Frigate [3] Displacement: 4,900 tonnes, standard Length: 133 m (436 ft 4 in) Beam: 16.1 m (52 ft 10 in) Draught: 7.3 m (23 ft 9 in) Propulsion: CODLAG with four 1,510 kW (2,025 shp) Paxman Valenta 12CM diesel generators powering two GEC electric motors delivering 2,980kW (4000 shp) and two Rolls-Royce Spey SM1A delivering 23,190 kW (31,100 shp) to two shafts Speed: 28 knots (52 km/h; 32 mph) Range: 14,485 kilometres (9,001 mi) at 15 knots (28 km/h; 17 mph) Complement: 185 Electronic warfare • 4 x 6-barrel Seagnat decoy launchers & decoys: • DFL2/3 offboard decoys HMS Monmouth (F235) 2 Armament: Anti-air missiles: • 1× 32-cell Sea Wolf GWS.26 VLS canisters for 32 Sea Wolf missiles (range 1-10 km) Anti-ship missiles: • 2 × quad Harpoon launchers Anti-submarine torpedoes: • 2 × Twin 12.75 in (324 mm) Sting Ray torpedo tubes Guns: • 1 × BAE 4.5 inch Mk8 gun • 2 × 30mm DS30M automated guns, or, 2× 30mm DS30B guns • 2 × Miniguns • 4 × General-purpose machine guns Aircraft carried: 1×Lynx HMA8, armed with; • 4× Sea Skua anti ship missiles, or • 2× anti submarine torpedoes or 1×Westland Merlin HM1, armed with; • 4× anti submarine torpedoes Aviation facilities: • Flight deck • Enclosed hangar HMS Monmouth is the sixth Type 23 frigate of the Royal Navy.
    [Show full text]
  • HCDC Inquiry - the Navy: Purpose and Procurement MOD Written Evidence
    NAV0030 HCDC Inquiry - The Navy: Purpose and Procurement MOD written evidence Executive Summary 1.1. The Integrated Review1, Defence Command Paper2 and Integrated Operating Concept3 set out a darkening strategic environment, the increasing threats to the UK and how the UK’s armed forces will operate, fight and win in an increasingly competitive age. Within this context, the Royal Navy is receiving significant investment to accelerate a drive to be more lethal, more available and more sustainable: A Global, Modern and Ready Navy. 1.2. The Royal Navy’s first duty will remain protecting the homeland and UK Overseas Territories and it will continue to be the foremost navy in Europe, attributing to NATO – among other capabilities – the nuclear deterrent, a fifth generation Carrier Strike Group (CSG) and Commando Forces launched from Littoral Strike platforms. 1.3. The Royal Navy will maintain its operational advantage in the North Atlantic (particularly under water), underpinned by deep interoperability with allies. Operational advantage in the future will be achieved by exploiting a network of autonomous, un-crewed and crewed platforms to provide enhanced sensing and rapid understanding, and, when necessary, to take decisive action. 1.4. The delivery of Carrier Strike marks a strategic shift in national Defence capability. The CSG projects the UK’s global reach and influence – reassuring allies and partners and deterring those who seek to undermine global security. 1.5. The advent of Littoral Strike and the transformation of the Royal Marines into the UK Commando Force will provide new options in an era of sub-threshold competition. Returning to their commando roots, marines will be more threat- focused, more disruptive and more lethal.
    [Show full text]