DOCSLIB.ORG

Republique Democratique Du Congo ------Ministere De L’Amenagement Du Territoire, Urbanisme Et Habitat Direction D’Etudes Et De Planification Secretariat Permanent

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Republique Democratique Du Congo ------Ministere De L’Amenagement Du Territoire, Urbanisme Et Habitat Direction D’Etudes Et De Planification Secretariat Permanent SFG4081 Public Disclosure Authorized REPUBLIQUE DEMOCRATIQUE DU CONGO ---------- MINISTERE DE L’AMENAGEMENT DU TERRITOIRE, URBANISME ET HABITAT DIRECTION D’ETUDES ET DE PLANIFICATION SECRETARIAT PERMANENT Ville Province de Kinshasa Ministère Provincial du Plan, des Travaux Publics et des infrastructures Public Disclosure Authorized ----------------- « Projet de Développement Urbain et de Résilience (PDUR-K) / Kinshasa » --------------- Public Disclosure Authorized CADRE DE POLITIQUE DE REINSTALLATION (CPR) DES POPULATIONS Public Disclosure Authorized VERSION FINALE Février 2017 1 TABLE DE MATIERE LISTE DES TABLEAUX ........................................................................................................ 5 LISTE DES FIGURES ............................................................................................................ 5 LISTE DES PHOTOS ............................................................................................................. 5 LISTE DES ANNEXES ........................................................................................................... 6 LISTE DES ABREVIATIONS ............................................................................................... 7 DEFINITIONS CLES ............................................................................................................ 10 RESUME EXECUTIF ........................................................................................................... 13 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................... 17 BOKUSE BWA MALONGI ................................................................................................. 21 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 26 1.1. CONTEXTE ET JUSTIFICATION ..................................................................................... 26 1.2. OBJECTIF DU CADRE DE POLITIQUE DE REINSTALLATION (CPR) DES POPULATIONS . 27 1.3. METHODOLOGIE POUR L’ELABORATION DU CPR ....................................................... 27 2. DESCRIPTION DU PROJET ET INFORMATION DE BASE SUR LA ZONE .... 30 2.1. JUSTIFICATION DU PROJET .......................................................................................... 30 2.2. OBJECTIF DU PROJET .................................................................................................. 30 2.3. LOCALISATION DU PROJET .......................................................................................... 31 2.4. COUT DU PROJET ........................................................................................................ 31 2.5. COMPOSANTES DU PROJET .......................................................................................... 32 2.6. DISPOSITIF RELATIF A LA MISE EN ŒUVRE DU PROJET ................................................. 36 2.7. COUT DE LA MISE EN ŒUVRE ................................ ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. 3. IMPACTS POTENTIELS DU PROJET SUR LES PERSONNES ET LES BIENS37 3.1. ACTIVITES POUVANT ENGENDRER LA REINSTALLATION ............................................. 37 3.2. IMPACTS SOCIAUX DU PROJET..................................................................................... 37 3.3. APPRECIATION DES IMPACTS PAR ACTIVITES .............................................................. 37 3.4. ESTIMATION DU NOMBRE DE PERSONNES AFFECTEES ET BESOINS APPROXIMATIFS EN TERRES .................................................................................................................................. 38 4. PRESENTATION GENERALE DE LA ZONE DU PROJET .................................. 39 5. CADRE LEGAL ET INSTITUTIONNEL DE LA REINSTALLATION ................ 44 5.1. CADRE LEGAL NATIONAL ........................................................................................... 44 5.1.1. Textes de base .................................................................................................. 44 5.1.2. Textes complémentaires ..................................................................................... 44 5.1.3. Principe de propriété ......................................................................................... 44 5.1.4. Procédure d’indemnisation ................................................................................ 45 5.2. POLITIQUE OPERATIONNELLE 4.12 DE LA BANQUE MONDIALE .................................. 47 5.3. CADRE INSTITUTIONNEL ............................................................................................. 54 5.3.1. Acteurs institutionnels responsables .................................................................. 54 5.3.2. Evaluation des capacités en matière de réinstallation des acteurs institutionnels .................................................................................................. 56 6. PRINCIPES, OBJECTIFS DE LA REINSTALLATION .......................................... 60 6.1. OBJECTIFS DE LA REINSTALLATION ............................................................................ 60 6.2. PRINCIPES APPLICABLES ............................................................................................. 60 6.3. MINIMISATION DES DEPLACEMENTS ........................................................................... 61 6.4. CATEGORIE ET CRITERES D’ELIGIBILITE ..................................................................... 61 6.4.1. Catégories éligibles ........................................................................................... 61 6.4.2. Date limite ou date butoir .................................................................................. 61 6.4.3. Critères d’éligibilité ........................................................................................... 62 2 6.4.4. Indemnisation .................................................................................................. 64 6.4.5. Impacts sur les revenus et assistance à la restauration des revenus ................. 65 6.4.6. Eligibilité des PAP ............................................................................................. 65 6.5. PRINCIPES GENERAUX DE LA REINSTALLATION .......................................................... 65 7. PREPARATION, REVUE ET APPROBATION DU PAR ........................................ 66 7.1. ETAPE 1 : PREPARATION............................................................................................. 66 7.1.1. Sous Etape 1 : Information des autorités et populations locales....................... 66 7.1.2. Sous Etape2 : Sélection sociale des activités du Projet ..................................... 66 a) Identification et sélection sociale du sous-projet ................................................... 67 b) Détermination du travail social à faire .................................................................. 67 c) Préparation d'un Plan d'Action de Réinstallation .................................................. 67 7.2. ETAPE 2 : APPROBATION DES PAR ............................................................................. 68 7.3. ETAPE 3 : MISE EN ŒUVRE DU PAR .............................................................................. 68 7.4. CONSULTATION .......................................................................................................... 68 7.5. CALENDRIER DE REINSTALLATION ............................................................................. 70 8. METHODE D’EVALUATION DES BIENS ET DETERMINATIONS DES TAUX DE COMPENSATION .......................................................................................................... 72 8.1. FORMES DE COMPENSATIONS ..................................................................................... 72 8.2. COMPENSATION DES TERRES ...................................................................................... 72 8.3. COMPENSATION DES RESSOURCES FORESTIERES ........................................................ 72 8.4. COMPENSATION POUR LES SITES CULTURELS, TOMBES ET BOIS SACRES ..................... 72 8.5. COMPENSATION DES CULTURES ET ARBRES FRUITIERS ............................................... 73 8.6. COMPENSATION POUR LES BATIMENTS ET INFRASTRUCTURES .................................... 73 8.7. COMPENSATION POUR PERTE DE REVENU POUR LES ACTIVITES FORMELLES ET INFORMELLES ........................................................................................................................ 74 8.8. SYNTHESE DES DROITS A LA COMPENSATION ............................................................. 74 8.9. PROCESSUS DE COMPENSATION .................................................................................. 75 8.9.1. Information .................................................................................................. 76 8.9.2. Participation publique ....................................................................................... 76 8.9.3. Documentation des avoirs et des biens .............................................................. 76 8.9.4. Convention pour la compensation ..................................................................... 76 8.9.5. Exécution de la compensation ........................................................................... 76 9 SYSTEME DE GESTION DES PLAINTES ET DES CONFLITS ........................... 79 9.1. TYPES DES PLAINTES ET CONFLITS A TRAITER ............................................................ 79 9.2. MECANISMES DE TRAITEMENT DES PLAINTES
Load more

Recommended publications
  • La Ville De Kinshasa
    « Kin la belle… – et Kin la poubelle» La ville de Kinshasa Suite à la dégradation économique et plu- En 1881, Henry sieurs vagues de pilla- Morton Stanley ges, les anciens quar- fonde le poste tiers de l’élite (la Léopoldville, Gombe, Ma Campa- nommé après gne à Ngaliema et par le Roi des quelques parties de Belges, colonisa- Limete) sont aujourd’hui d’un charme plutôt morbide. teur du Congo. L’endroit est spacieux et facile à défen- La réhabilitation des routes demeure un défi majeur. dre, ils existent plusieurs villages autochtones sur le Le personnel de la mission EUPOL RD Congo à Kinshasa, Dans les cités, des tornades de pluie font écouler des site. Léopoldville devient centre administratif du octobre 2008. maisons pendant chaque saison de pluie. Congo-Belge en 1929 (avant, c’était la ville de Boma « Kinshasa – the beauty and the beast »: Due to the de- sur la côte atlantique). La capitale devient Kinshasa en gradation of the economic situation and several lootings, 1966. / I n 1881, Henry Morton Stanley founds Leopold- EUPOL RDC et EUSEC RDC, ville, a settlement named after the Belgian King, owner the ancient elite’s quarters of Gombe, Ma Campagne in les deux missions PESD Ngaliema and some parts of Limete show nowadays a of the colony. The site is vast and easy to defend; there rather morbid charme. Rehabilitating Kinshasa’s roads en République Démocratique du Congo, are already several villages of natives in the area. Leo- rests a major challenge for the city’s development. In the vous souhaitent un bon séjour poldville is named administrative center of the Belgian- popular quarters, violent rain downpours bring down à Kinshasa.
    [Show full text]
  • Concept Project Information Document
    The World Bank Kinshasa Multisector Development and Urban Resilience Project (P171141) Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Project Information Document (PID) Concept Stage | Date Prepared/Updated: 22-Oct-2019 | Report No: PIDC27359 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Jun 18, 2019 Page 1 of 13 The World Bank Kinshasa Multisector Development and Urban Resilience Project (P171141) BASIC INFORMATION A. Basic Project Data OPS TABLE Country Project ID Parent Project ID (if any) Project Name Congo, Democratic Republic P171141 Kinshasa Multisector of Development and Urban Resilience Project (P171141) Region Estimated Appraisal Date Estimated Board Date Practice Area (Lead) AFRICA Apr 27, 2020 Jul 30, 2020 Urban, Resilience and Land Financing Instrument Borrower(s) Implementing Agency Investment Project Financing Ministry of Finance Cellule Infrastructures Proposed Development Objective(s) The project development objective is to strengthen urban management capacity and improve access to infrastructure, services, skills and socio-economic opportunities for the residents of select neighborhoods of Kinshasa. PROJECT FINANCING DATA (US$, Millions) SUMMARY-NewFin1 Total Project Cost 500.00 Total Financing 500.00 of which IBRD/IDA 500.00 Financing Gap 0.00 DETAILS-NewFinEnh1 World Bank Group Financing International Development Association (IDA) 500.00 IDA Credit 500.00 Environmental and Social Risk Classification Concept Review Decision Jun 18, 2019 Page 2 of 13 The World Bank Kinshasa Multisector Development
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Republic of Congo Round 7 – Service Delivery Point Questionnaire
    Democratic Republic of Congo Round 7 – Service Delivery Point Questionnaire ◯ Yes 001a. Your ID: [NAME] Is this your ID? ◯ No 001b. Enter your ID below. Please record your ID Day: 002b. Record the correct date and time. Month: Year: ◯ KonGo Central 003a. Province ◯ KINSHASA ◯ BARUMBU ◯ BAS_FLEUVE ◯ BINZA_METEO ◯ BINZA_OZONE ◯ BIYELA ◯ BOMA ◯ BUMBU ◯ CATARACTES ◯ KALAMU_I ◯ KALAMU_II ◯ KIKIMI ◯ KIMBANSEKE ◯ KINGABWA ◯ KINGASANI ◯ KINSHASA 003b. District ◯ KINTAMBO ◯ KISENSO ◯ LEMBA ◯ LIMETE ◯ LINGWALA ◯ LUKAYA ◯ MASINA_I ◯ MASINA_II ◯ MATADI ◯ MATETE ◯ MONT_NGAFULA_I ◯ MONT_NGAFULA_II ◯ NGABA ◯ NGIRINGIRI ◯ SELEMBAO 1 ◯ BARUMBU ◯ BAS_FLEUVE ◯ BINZA_METEO ◯ BINZA_OZONE ◯ BIYELA ◯ BOMA ◯ BUMBU ◯ CATARACTES ◯ KALAMU_I ◯ KALAMU_II ◯ KIKIMI ◯ KIMBANSEKE ◯ KINGABWA ◯ KINGASANI ◯ KINSHASA 003b. Zone de Santé ◯ KINTAMBO ◯ KISENSO ◯ LEMBA ◯ LIMETE ◯ LINGWALA ◯ LUKAYA ◯ MASINA_I ◯ MASINA_II ◯ MATADI ◯ MATETE ◯ MONT_NGAFULA_I ◯ MONT_NGAFULA_II ◯ NGABA ◯ NGIRINGIRI ◯ SELEMBAO ◯ 17_MAI ◯ ASSOSSA_NGIRI_NGIRI ◯ BAKI_VILLE ◯ BAMBOMA ◯ BANA ◯ BANGU ◯ BETON ◯ BINZA_PIGEON 003c. Aire de Santé ◯ BITSHAKU_TSHAKU ◯ BOBA ◯ BUMBA ◯ BUNZI ◯ CAMP_PERMANENT ◯ CNECI ◯ CONGO ◯ CONGO_1 2 ◯ DIANGIENDA_I ◯ DINGI_DINGI ◯ ESSANGA ◯ HYGIENE_A ◯ IMBALI ◯ INGA ◯ KAPINGA ◯ KASAI_MASINA ◯ KASAI_BUMBU ◯ KAUKA_I ◯ KEMI ◯ KHAMI ◯ KHESA ◯ KIFUMA_NGIMBI ◯ KIKIMI ◯ KIMBANGU_A ◯ KIMBANZA ◯ KIMBATA___TUDI ◯ KIMBIANGA ◯ KIMBONDO1(_KINDELE) ◯ KIMUAKA ◯ KINGABWA ◯ KINKENGE ◯ KINSUKA_PECHEUR ◯ KINZAU_MVUE ◯ KIPASA ◯ KISANTU ◯ KISENSO_GARE ◯ KITOMESA ◯ KIVALA_TADI ◯ KIVEVE ◯ KIVUNDA ◯ KUMBI
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the UN Joint Human Rights Office on Serious Human Rights
    REPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS JOINT HUMAN RIGHTS OFFICE ON SERIOUS HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS COMMITTED BY MEMBERS OF THE CONGOLESE DEFENSE AND SECURITY FORCES IN KINSHASA IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO BETWEEN 26 NOVEMBER AND 25 DECEMBER 2011 MARS 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................... 4 II. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 6 III. METHODOLOGY AND CONSTRAINTS .......................................................................... 7 IV. LEGAL FRAMEWORK ....................................................................................................... 8 V. HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS ....................................................................................... 9 A. Violations of the right to life ......................................................................................................... 9 B. Violations of the right to physical integrity ................................................................................. 12 C. Violations of the right to liberty and security of person .............................................................. 13 VI. IDENTIFICATION OF ALLEGED PERPETRATORS .................................................... 14 VII. MEASURES TAKEN BY THE CONGOLESE AUTHORITIES, MONUSCO AND OTHER UNITED NATIONS ACTORS AND BY THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Using Electronic Case Management System (Ecms) for Efficient And
    What Works? Effective coordination between OVC and HIV clinical partners to improve pediatric HIV case finding, retention and viral load suppression Presented by the OVC Task Force and Interagency PEPFAR Colleagues Wednesday, December 13th 8-9:30 AM New York (GMT-4) | 2-3:30 PM Joburg (GMT+2) | 3-4:30 PM Nairobi (GMT+3) 1 Introduction Tanya Medrano, OVC TF Co-Chair and Technical Advisor for Vulnerable Children and Youth, FHI 360 Agenda Presenter Title Tanya Medrano, Technical Advisor for Vulnerable Children and Youth, Introduction FHI 360 Janet Barry, OVC TF Co-Chair and Senior Technical Advisor, Opening Remarks Bantwana Initiative, World Education Belmiro Sousa the Technical Director, COVida Project, FHI Triangulating OVC Program and Health Facility Data to 360/Mozambique Improve Pediatric Retention and Viral Suppression Dr. Silvia Matitimel Mikusova, Technical director, EGPAF/Mozambique Dr. Tania Tchissambou, Technical Director for Increase Access to Collaboration between OVC and clinical HIV programs Comprehensive HIV/AIDS Prevention, Care and Treatment in the DRC Services project, DRC Maggie Kuchonde, Program Manager at Lilongwe Catholic Health Coordination between OVC and HIV Clinical Partners Commission, Malawi for the Lilongwe Catholic Health Commission OVC Activity Viva Thorsen, Orphans and Vulnerable Children Unit Lead, CDC Facilitated Q&A Julie DeSoto, OVC Program Manager & Adolescent Health/Mental Moderator Health Technical Lead, World Vision Zoom Webinar Functionality Audio Q&A Chat Polls Zoom Webinar Please use the chat box to introduce If you are unable to hear, yourself. connect your speakers by selecting “Join Audio.” Share thoughts and comments by Use the up arrow to change sending a message your speaker selection.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Availability of Bushmeat for Consumption in Central African Cities
    Environmental Research Letters LETTER • OPEN ACCESS Mapping the availability of bushmeat for consumption in Central African cities To cite this article: John E Fa et al 2019 Environ. Res. Lett. 14 094002 View the article online for updates and enhancements. This content was downloaded from IP address 202.137.225.92 on 18/03/2020 at 09:26 Environ. Res. Lett. 14 (2019) 094002 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab36fa LETTER Mapping the availability of bushmeat for consumption in Central OPEN ACCESS African cities RECEIVED 22 February 2019 John E Fa1,2,7 , Juliet H Wright3,7, Stephan M Funk4,5, Ana Luz Márquez6, Jesús Olivero6, REVISED Miguel Ángel Farfán6, Fanny Guio3, Luc Mayet3, Divin Malekani3, Charles Holo Louzolo3, 5 July 2019 Robert Mwinyihali3, David S Wilkie3 and Michelle Wieland3 ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION 30 July 2019 1 Division of Biology and Conservation Ecology, School of Science and the Environment, Manchester Metropolitan University, PUBLISHED Manchester M1 5GD, United Kingdom 2 20 August 2019 Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Jalan Cifor Rawajaha, Situ Gede, Bogor Barat, Kota Bogor, Jawa Barat 16115, Indonesia 3 Wildlife Conservation Society, 2300 Southern Boulevard, Bronx, NY 10460, United States of America Original content from this 4 Nature Heritage, St. Lawrence, Jersey, Channel Islands, United Kingdom work may be used under 5 the terms of the Creative Centrode Excelencia en Medicina Traslacional, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile Commons Attribution 3.0 6 Grupo de Biogeografía, Diversidad y Conservación, Departamento de Biología Animal, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga E-29071, Spain licence. 7 Authors to whom any correspondence should be addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of a WHO Informal Consultation on Sustainable Control of Human African Trypanosomiasis
    Report of a WHO Informal Consultation on sustainable control of human African trypanosomiasis 1—3 May 2007 Geneva, Switzerland WHO/CDS/NTD/IDM/2007.6 Report of a WHO Informal Consultation on sustainable control of human African trypanosomiasis 1—3 May 2007 Geneva, Switzerland © World Health Organization 2007 All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use. Contents 1. Introduction ...............................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • La Pépinière
    RAPPORT ETUDE DE BASE La pépinière SEPTEMBRE 2016 Dieudonné KAMBALE Syauswa, Assistant Conception, Suivi et évaluation - Bureau de Goma Gillian COOK Carlotta FASSIOTTI Cheffe de Bureau - Kinshasa DME Manager - RDC Search for Common Ground Search for Common Ground 5, avenue Bandoma, Quartier GB 104, Avenue de la Corniche, Commune de Ngaliema, Kinshasa Commune de Goma, Goma +243(0) 817150736 +243 (0) 812853379 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Baseline | La Pépinière Table des matières Abréviations ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Résumé exécutif ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Méthodologie ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Limitations ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 Principales conclusions .................................................................................................................................... 6 Recommandations ............................................................................................................................................ 7 1. Contexte du projet ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Commune De Limete Republique De
    KINSHASA ENQUETES NUTRITIONNELLES COMMUNES DE KIMBANSEKE, SELEMBAO, KINSHASA ET POOL KINGABWA - COMMUNE DE LIMETE REPUBLIQUE DEMOCRATIQUE DU CONGO ACTION AGAINST HUNGER (ACF-USA) / CEPLANUT 26 JUILLET AU 1er OCTOBRE 1999 Financée par la Coopération française I.- INTRODUCTION 1.1.- CONTEXTE Avec la reprise de la guerre en août 1998, la situation humanitaire en République Démocratique du Congo déjà difficile, devient préoccupante. Outre les mouvements de population que ces combats entraînent, la sécurité alimentaire des populations se précarise et l'activité agricole est désorganisée. La crise économique profonde auquel le pays fait face accroît les situations de précarités et de vulnérabilités des populations, principalement dans les villes. La ville de Kinshasa est particulièrement touchée. Les ressources qui auparavant y affluaient abondamment sont en diminution, voire disparaissent. La perte du contrôle d'une partie importante du pays a annulé les revenus en provenance de ces régions. Les conséquences sont : un ralentissement des activités économiques, une augmentation du chômage, une perte de pouvoir d'achat (estimée par la FAO à 30%) un appauvrissement généralisé de la population, Les difficultés de ravitaillement de la ville dues aux conséquences de la guerre et l'état très dégradé des routes d'accès viennent aggraver la situation alimentaire dans la capitale congolaise. On peut donc légitimement s’attendre à une incidence de la dégradation croissante de la situation économique sur l’état nutritionnel des populations. 1.2.- JUSTIFICATION DE L’ETUDE Au vu de la diversité de la ville de Kinshasa, de son étendue et de sa forte population, il est difficile de connaître avec précision la situation nutritionnelle de cette métropole.
    [Show full text]
  • DRC-Handicap International 2015
    Handicap International – Federal Information – DRC Country card – 2015 08 EN DDeemmooccrraattiicc RReeppuubblliicc ooff CCoonnggoo 22001155 MANDATE Handicap International aims at improving the living conditions of people with disabilities, preventing all forms of disability, training care service providers in the early detection of disabilities, promoting inclusive education and advancing the rights of people with disabilities by building the capacities of local operators in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Handicap International also works in an emergency context and helps the most vulnerable in areas affected by the alarming humanitarian crisis in Eastern DRC (North Kivu). SITUATION The Democratic Republic of Congo is the 2nd largest country in Africa. Its border is 9,165 km long and it plays a central and strategic role in the region. The DRC is one of the most multi-ethnic countries in Africa. It is considered to be the world’s largest French-speaking country. However, in economic terms, 80% of people depend for their livelihood on the informal sector. The DRC is ranked 186 out of 187 countries on the human development index. For more than fifteen years, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has been torn apart by an alarming humanitarian crisis, characterised by violent armed conflict (especially in the North and South Kivu regions), a very large number of displaced persons and refugees, various epidemics (cholera, measles, viral haemorrhagic fever), natural disasters (floods, hurricanes, heavy rains, droughts, bush fires and landslides) and a general context of poverty and insecurity. In this context, many people were internally displaced, and maybe peple have sought refuge in neighbouring countries1.
    [Show full text]
  • Situation Report
    BABAY ZIKA VIRUS SITUATION REPORT YELLOW FEVER 15 JULY 2016 SUMMARY . In Angola, as of 8 July 2016 a total of 3625 suspected cases have been reported, of which 876 are confirmed. The total number of reported deaths is 357, of which 117 were reported among confirmed cases. Suspected cases have been reported in all 18 provinces and confirmed cases have been reported in 16 of 18 provinces and 80 of 125 reporting districts. Mass reactive vaccination campaigns first began in Luanda and have now expanded to cover most of the other affected parts of Angola. Recently, the campaigns have focused on border areas. Despite extensive vaccination efforts circulation of the virus persists. Eleven reactive and pre-emptive mass vaccination campaigns are ongoing in several districts in Benguela, Huambo, Huila, Kwanza Norte, Kwanza Sul, Lunda Norte and Uige provinces. Six other mass vaccination campaigns are nearing completion. Mop-up campaigns are being implemented in parts of the provinces of Cunene, Lunda Norte, Uige and Zaire. Other than an increase in the number of suspected cases recently reported, there are no updates regarding the epidemiological situation in the Democratic Republic of The Congo (DRC). For the last three weeks the national laboratory in DRC has been unable to confirm or discard any suspected cases of yellow fever due to technical issues. According to the latest available information (as of 11 July), the total number of notified suspected cases is 1798, with 68 confirmed cases (as of 24 June) and 85 reported deaths. Cases have been reported in 22 health zones in five of 26 provinces.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminals Or Vigilantes ? the Kuluna Gangs of the Democratic Republic
    POLICY BRIEF CRIMINALS OR VIGILANTES? The Kuluna gangs of the Democratic Republic of Congo Marc-André Lagrange and Thierry Vircoulon MAY 2021 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit for funding this research. We are grateful to our local advisors Dasol, Bantu Lukambo, Viko and Fab, who provided access to the Kinshasa gang scene and invaluable insights into the gangs’ activities and way of life. We would also like to thank Veronique Moufflet for her photographic contribution and professor Sara Liwerant of Kinshasa University for her pioneering work on the Kuluna gangs. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Marc-André Lagrange is a senior researcher on conflict, humanitarian and security issues in central Africa. He previously worked with the International Crisis Group as senior analyst and spent several years working in the Democratic Republic of Congo in various capacities. He W frequently collaborates with the French Institute for International Affairs. Thierry Vircoulon coordinates the Observatory of Central and Southern Africa of the French Institute for International Affairs. He has worked for the French foreign ministry, the European Commission, the International Crisis Group and the Institute for Political Studies in Paris. He has written extensively on security, governance and development issues in the Democratic Republic of Congo. © 2021 Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or
    [Show full text]