Study Photographs of Ancient Mosaics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8m046tv No online items PRELIMINARY INVENTORY OF THE STUDY PHOTOGRAPHS OF ANCIENT MOSAICS Finding aid prepared by Charlie Rossow and Ann Harrison PRELIMINARY INVENTORY OF THE 76.P.8 1 STUDY PHOTOGRAPHS OF ANCIENT MOSAICS ... Descriptive Summary Title: Study photographs of ancient mosaics Date (inclusive): 1900s Number: 76.P.8 Creator/Collector: Getty Research Institute Physical Description: 32.7 linear feet(156 boxes) Repository: The Getty Research Institute Special Collections 1200 Getty Center Drive, Suite 1100 Los Angeles, California, 90049-1688 (310) 440-7390 Abstract: A collection of modern photographs assembled by the Getty Research Institute of ancient mosaics, both in situ and removed, concentrating on the Greek and Roman periods, Greek Archaic through the late Roman Empire (6th century BC-6th century AD). Language: Collection material is in English Biographical/Historical Note In 1974, the J. Paul Getty Museum began assembling a "photo library" by consolidating the visual resources of each existing curatorial department. By the early 1980s, the Photo Archive was actively acquiring large collections of photographs from commercial and private sources and scholars' archives that contained a photographic component. In 1983, the nearly one million photographs of the Photo Archive were incorporated into the Research Institute's Special Collections. Other Finding Aids The Photo Archive Database includes photograph level access to approximately 50% of the photographs in this collection. Access Open for use by qualified researchers. For further information, consult the Guide to the Photo Archive and Database . Publication Rights Photographs and permission to publish must be obtained from copyright holder(s). For further information, contact Library Reproductions and Permissions . Processing History Finding aid created in 2009. Scope and Content of Collection An assembled collection of modern photographs of ancient mosaics, both in situ and removed, concentrating on the Greek and Roman periods, Greek Archaic through the late Roman Empire (6th century BC-6th century AD). Photographic coverage of ancient sites is most complete for the countries of Greece, Italy, Libya, Tunisia, and Turkey, but the collection also contains photos of mosaics from other countries, including Algeria, Austria, Cyprus, Egypt, England, France, Germany, Hungary, Jordan, Lebanon, Malta, Morocco, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, Syria, and Yugoslavia. The collection contains photographs from numerous sources including commercial vendors and photographers, research institutions' archives, excavation campaigns, and scholars' archives and collections. Among the commercial sources, the most important are Alinari (including the Anderson and Brogi archives); Photographie Giraudon; Gabinetto fotografico nazionale, Rome, including the Antonio Giuliano collection; Hirmer Verlag; Rheinisches Bildarchiv Köln; Scala Art Resource; Barbara Bini; John Ross; and Emile Serafis. Some of the research institutions' archives from which the collection holds modern prints are the Fototeca unione at the American Academy in Rome; Deutsches Archäologisches Institut (DAI), Athens and Rome; École française d'archéologie d'Athènes; Art Museum, Princeton University; and the American School of Classical Studies at Athens. Arrangement Arrangement is geographical, filed alphabetically by name of modern country, then name of ancient city or site, and monument. Subjects - Topics Mosaics, Ancient Mosaics, Ancient--Greece PRELIMINARY INVENTORY OF THE 76.P.8 2 STUDY PHOTOGRAPHS OF ANCIENT MOSAICS ... Mosaics, Ancient--Italy Mosaics, Ancient--Libya Mosaics, Ancient--Tunisia Mosaics, Ancient--Turkey Mosaics, Greek Mosaics, Roman Genres and Forms of Material Photographic prints Contributors Bini, Barbara Getty Research Institute Giuliano, Antonio Ross, John Serafis, Emile Study photographs of ancient mosaics Box 1 Albania Box 2-3 Algeria Box 4 Austria Box 5 Cyprus Box 6 Egypt Box 7-11 England Box 12-15 France Box 16-21 Germany Box 22-46 Greece Box 22 Argos Box 23-24 Athens Box 25 Corinth Box 26-36 Delos Box 37 Delphi, Dodecanese, Eretia, Isthmia Box 38-42 Kenchreai Box 43 Knossos, Kos, Lechaion Box 44 Olympia, Olynthos, Paros, Patrai, Pella, Piraeus, Rhodes Box 45 Sikyon Box 46 Sparta, Thebes Box 47 Hungary, Israel Box 48-82 Italy Box 48 Ad Saxa Rubra, Aesis, Agrigentum, Alba Longa, Altinum, Antium, Aquileia, Arretium, Asciano, Atina Box 49 Baccano, Baiae, Bononia Box 50 Campania Box 51 Canusium, Capranica, Capua, Casal di Statua, Centum Cellae, Ciciliano, Claterna, Comiso, Cora, Cosa, Desenzano del Garda, Este Box 52 Falerii Veteres, Falerio, Forum Julii, Frascati, Fulginia, Hadria Box 53 Herculaneum Box 54 Iguvium, Imola, Ischia di Castro, Kaulonia Box 55 Lanuvium, Larinum, Licenza, Lorium Box 56 Lucus Feroniae Box 57 Mediolanum, Messina, Mevania, Minturnae, Montevenere, Morgantina, Motya, Oplontis Box 58-65 Ostia Box 66 Opitergium, Panormos, Perugia, Piacenza, Pisae, Purgi, Risaro PRELIMINARY INVENTORY OF THE 76.P.8 3 STUDY PHOTOGRAPHS OF ANCIENT MOSAICS ... Study photographs of ancient mosaics Box 67-68 Piazza Armerina Box 69-73 Pompeii Box 74 Praeneste Box 75-78 Rome Box 79 Sant'Angelo in Formis, Sarsina, Sentinum, Stabiae, Sulmo, Tibur, Tor Marancio, Torrenova, Tor Tre Teste, Turris Libysonis, Tusculum, Urvino Hortense Box 80-81 Tibur (Tivoli) Box 82 Unidentified Box 83 Jordan, Lebanon Box 84-89 Libya Box 84 Apollonia, Homs, Ptolemais Box 85 Cyrene Box 86 Leptis Magna Box 87 Sabratha Box 88 Qasr El-Lebia, Tripoli, Uadi-Ez-Zgaia Box 89 Zliten (Dar Buc Ammera) Box 90 Malta Box 91 Morocco Box 92 Portugal Box 93-94 Spain Box 95 Syria Box 96-122 Tunisia Box 96 Acholla, Althiburus, Ammaedara, Bir Chana, Bir El Caid Box 97-99 Bulla Regia Box 96 Capsa Box 100-103 Carthage Box 96 Chebba, Cillium, Civitas Siagitana, Curubis, Dar Zmela Box 104 Djebel Oust Box 96 El Alia, El Haouria, Elles, Furnos Minus Box 105 Gigthis Box 106-108 Hadrumetum Box 105 Kalaa Kebira, Khanguet el Hadjadj, Mactaris, Maxula, Mokenine, Naro, Oued Blibane, Oued Ramel Box 109 Sisi Abdallah, Sidi Bou Ali, Smirat, Sufetula, Taparura Box 110 Thabraca Box 111 Thaenae (Henchir Thina) Box 110 Thelepta Box 112 Themetra Box 110 Thignica Box 113-114 Thuburbo Maius Box 115 Thugga (Dougga) Box 116-120 Thysdrus Box 121 Utica Box 110 Uthina, Uzitta, Vaga Box 122 Unidentified Box 123-149 Turkey Box 123-127 Antioch-on-the-Orontes Box 128 Constantinople Box 129-140 Daphne-Harbie Box 141 Daphne-Yakto Box 142 Halikarnassos Box 143-146 Seleucia Pieria Box 147-149 Unidentified Box 150 Yugoslavia Box 151 Provenience unknown Arrangement note Filed by modern city and museum. PRELIMINARY INVENTORY OF THE 76.P.8 4 STUDY PHOTOGRAPHS OF ANCIENT MOSAICS ... Study photographs of ancient mosaics Box 152 Forgeries; Current location unknown Box 153-154 Unidentified photographs Box 155* Oversize photographs Box 156 Slides PRELIMINARY INVENTORY OF THE 76.P.8 5 STUDY PHOTOGRAPHS OF ANCIENT MOSAICS ....
Recommended publications
  • Perspektiven Der Spolienforschung 2. Zentren Und Konjunkturen Der

    Perspektiven Der Spolienforschung 2. Zentren Und Konjunkturen Der

    Perspektiven der Spolienforschung Stefan Altekamp Carmen Marcks-Jacobs Peter Seiler (eds.) BERLIN STUDIES OF THE ANCIENT WORLD antiker Bauten, Bauteile und Skulpturen ist ein weitverbreite- tes Phänomen der Nachantike. Rom und der Maghreb liefern zahlreiche und vielfältige Beispiele für diese An- eignung materieller Hinterlassenscha en der Antike. Während sich die beiden Regionen seit dem Ausgang der Antike politisch und kulturell sehr unterschiedlich entwickeln, zeigen sie in der praktischen Umsetzung der Wiederverwendung, die zwischenzeitlich quasi- indus trielle Ausmaße annimmt, strukturell ähnliche orga nisatorische, logistische und rechtlich-lenkende Praktiken. An beiden Schauplätzen kann die Antike alternativ als eigene oder fremde Vergangenheit kon- struiert und die Praxis der Wiederverwendung utili- taristischen oder ostentativen Charakter besitzen. 40 · 40 Perspektiven der Spolien- forschung Stefan Altekamp Carmen Marcks-Jacobs Peter Seiler Bibliographische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliographie; detaillierte bibliographische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar. © Edition Topoi / Exzellenzcluster Topoi der Freien Universität Berlin und der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Abbildung Umschlag: Straßenkreuzung in Tripolis, Photo: Stefan Altekamp Typographisches Konzept und Einbandgestaltung: Stephan Fiedler Printed and distributed by PRO BUSINESS digital printing Deutschland GmbH, Berlin ISBN ---- URN urn:nbn:de:kobv:- First published Published under Creative Commons Licence CC BY-NC . DE. For the terms of use of the illustrations, please see the reference lists. www.edition-topoi.org INHALT , -, Einleitung — 7 Commerce de Marbre et Remploi dans les Monuments de L’Ifriqiya Médiévale — 15 Reuse and Redistribution of Latin Inscriptions on Stone in Post-Roman North-Africa — 43 Pulcherrima Spolia in the Architecture and Urban Space at Tripoli — 67 Adding a Layer.
  • The History and Description of Africa and of the Notable Things Therein Contained, Vol

    The History and Description of Africa and of the Notable Things Therein Contained, Vol

    The history and description of Africa and of the notable things therein contained, Vol. 3 http://www.aluka.org/action/showMetadata?doi=10.5555/AL.CH.DOCUMENT.nuhmafricanus3 Use of the Aluka digital library is subject to Aluka’s Terms and Conditions, available at http://www.aluka.org/page/about/termsConditions.jsp. By using Aluka, you agree that you have read and will abide by the Terms and Conditions. Among other things, the Terms and Conditions provide that the content in the Aluka digital library is only for personal, non-commercial use by authorized users of Aluka in connection with research, scholarship, and education. The content in the Aluka digital library is subject to copyright, with the exception of certain governmental works and very old materials that may be in the public domain under applicable law. Permission must be sought from Aluka and/or the applicable copyright holder in connection with any duplication or distribution of these materials where required by applicable law. Aluka is a not-for-profit initiative dedicated to creating and preserving a digital archive of materials about and from the developing world. For more information about Aluka, please see http://www.aluka.org The history and description of Africa and of the notable things therein contained, Vol. 3 Alternative title The history and description of Africa and of the notable things therein contained Author/Creator Leo Africanus Contributor Pory, John (tr.), Brown, Robert (ed.) Date 1896 Resource type Books Language English, Italian Subject Coverage (spatial) Northern Swahili Coast;Middle Niger, Mali, Timbucktu, Southern Swahili Coast Source Northwestern University Libraries, G161 .H2 Description Written by al-Hassan ibn-Mohammed al-Wezaz al-Fasi, a Muslim, baptised as Giovanni Leone, but better known as Leo Africanus.
  • Arc Chi Ives S P Poin Nss

    Arc Chi Ives S P Poin Nss

    Département de la Département des Études et Bibliothèque et de la de la Recherche Documention - - Programme Service du Patrimoine « Histoire de Inventaire des Archives l’archéologie française en Afrique du Nord » ARCHIVES POINSSOT (Archives 106) Inventaire au 15 février 2014 - mis à jour le 16/11/2016 (provisoire) FONDS POINSSOT (Archives 106) Dates extrêmes : 1875-2002 Importance matérielle : 206 cartons, 22 mètres-linéaires Lieu de conservation : Bibliothèque de l’INHA (Paris) Producteurs : Julien Poinssot (1844-1900), Louis Poinssot (1879-1967), Claude Poinssot (1928-2002) ; Paul Gauckler (1866-1911), Alfred Merlin (1876-1965), Gabriel Puaux (1883-1970), Bernard Roy (1846-1919). Modalités d'entrée : Achat auprès de Mme Claude Poinssot (2005) Conditions d'accès et d’utilisation : La consultation de ces documents est soumise à l'autorisation de la Bibliothèque de l’INHA. Elle s’effectue sur rendez-vous auprès du service Patrimoine : [email protected]. La reproduction et la diffusion de pièces issues du fonds sont soumises à l’autorisation de l’ayant-droit. Instrument de recherche associé : Base AGORHA (INHA) Présentatin du contenu : Le fonds comprend les papiers de Julien Poinssot (1844-1900), de Louis Poinssot (1879-1967) et de Claude Poinssot (1928- 2002), et couvre une période de plus de 100 ans, des années 1860 au début des années 2000. Il contient des papiers personnels de Julien et Louis Poinssot, les archives provenant des activités professionnelles de Louis et Claude Poinssot, et les archives provenant des travaux de recherche de ces trois chercheurs. Le fonds comprend également les papiers d’autres archéologues et épigraphistes qui ont marqué l'histoire de l'archéologie de l'Afrique du Nord, Paul Gauckler (1866-1911), Bernard Roy (1846-1919) et Alfred Merlin (1876-1965).
  • Durham Research Online

    Durham Research Online

    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 05 June 2020 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Hellstrom, Monica (2020) 'Epigraphy and ambitions : building inscriptions in the hinterland of Carthage.', Journal of Roman studies., 110 . pp. 57-90. Further information on publisher's website: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0075435820001380 Publisher's copyright statement: This article has been published in a revised form in The Journal of Roman Studies. This version is published under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND. No commercial re-distribution or re-use allowed. Derivative works cannot be distributed. c The Author(s). Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk 1 Epigraphy and Ambitions: Building Inscriptions in the Hinterland of Carthage MONICA HELLSTRÖM* Building inscriptions are not a good proxy for building activity or, by extension, prosperity. In the part of Roman North Africa where they are the most common, the majority of the surviving building inscriptions document the construction of religious buildings by holders of local priesthoods, usually of the imperial cult.
  • Agà Nbropbà Etuà

    Agà Nbropbà Etuà

    Bibliografia tematica Fori SADOK BEN BAAZIZ, Les Forums romains en Tunisie “Essai de Bilan”, in Los foros romanos de las provincias occidentales, Madrid, Ministerio de Cultura, Dirección General de Bellas Artes y Archivos. Departamento de Arqueologia, 1987, pp. 221-236. SAMIA IIHEM AMMAR, Réflexions comparatives sur quelques programmes d’urbanisme en Tunisie antique:l’aménagement des fora (du Ier au IIIe siècle de notre ère, in L’Africa romana, Ati del X convegno di studio, Oristano, 1-13 dicembre 1992, a cura di A. MASTINO, P. RUGGERI, Sassari 1994, pp. 445-462. ST. GSELL, Edifices chrétiens de Thélepte et d’Amaedara, Tunis 1933. G. CH. PICARD, Civitas Mactaritana (“Karthago, VIII),. V: ch Basilica Juvenum, pp. 96-147. K. MILLER, Itineraria Romana, Stutgart 1916 (ristampa anastatica, Roma 1964). Atlas archéologique de la Tunisie, Édition spéciale des cartes topographiques accompagnée d’un texte explicatif rédigé par E. BABELON, R. CAGNAT, S. REINACH,I-II, Paris 1893-. [BEFR, F°, B, 228] [Les chiffres renvoient aux numéros des carts: Ad Pertusa, 22; Ain Djeloula,46; Aphrodisium, 42, fig. 1; Beja, 20; Bordj-el-Menzel, 44, fig. 1; Bulla Regia, 26; Carthage et environs, 15, pl. Hors texte; 15, figg. 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8; Chemtou, 33; Djebel Moraba, 30; Hadrumete, 48, figg. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; Henchir Chaada, 38; Henchir Ech-Cuegarnia, 42, fig. 3; Henchir Grannda, 44, fig. 8; Henchir Harat, 38; Henchir el-Menzel, 44, figg. 2, 3, 4; Henchir Zembia, 44, fig. 7; Henchir Ziba, 44, figg. 9, 10; Horrea Caelia, 44, figg. 5, 6; El-Knissia, 48, fig.
  • Paper Sample Riga

    Paper Sample Riga

    International Cartographic Association Commission on Cartographic Heritage into the Digital 14th ICA Conference Digital Approaches to Cartographic Heritage Conference Proceedings ISSN XXXX-XXXX - Thessaloniki, Greece, 8-10 May 2019 _____________________________________________________________________________________ Lyudmila Filatova1, Dmitri Gusev2, Sergey Stafeyev3 Iterative Reconstruction of Ptolemy’s West Africa Using Modern GIS Analysis Keywords: Claudius Ptolemy, ancient geography, GIS analysis, historical cartography, georeferencing Summary: The multifaceted and challenging problem of reconstructing Claudius Ptolemy’s map of ancient West Africa from the numeric coordinate data and other information found in his seminal ‘Geography’ and visualizing the results in modern projections using popular and powerful GIS tools, such as ArcGIS and Google Earth, is addressed by the authors iteratively. We apply a combination of several old and new techniques ranging from tradi- tional toponymic analysis to novel modifications of cluster analysis. Our hybrid human- machine method demonstrates that Ptolemy’s information on West Africa is a compilation of data from three or more sources, including at least one version or derivative of The Periplus of Hanno. The newest iteration adds data for three more provinces of Ptolemy’s Libya — Mauretania Caesariensis, Africa and Aethiopia Interior— to Mauretania Tingitana and Libya Interior investigated in an earlier, unpublished version of the work that the late Lyudmila Filatova had contributed to as the founder of our multi-year project. The surviv- ing co-authors used their newest digital analysis methods (triangulation and flocking with Bayesian correction) and took into account their recent finds on Ptolemy’s Sinae (Guinea/Senegal, where Ptolemy had placed fish-eating Aethiopians). We discuss some of the weaknesses and fallacies of the earlier approaches to the problem.
  • Map 33 Theveste-Hadrumetum Compiled by R.B

    Map 33 Theveste-Hadrumetum Compiled by R.B

    Map 33 Theveste-Hadrumetum Compiled by R.B. Hitchner, 1997 Introduction (See Map 32) Directory All place names are in Tunisia unless otherwise noted Abbreviations AAA S. Gsell, Atlas archéologique de l’Algérie, Algiers and Paris, 1911 AAT I E. Babelon, R. Cagnat and S. Reinach, Atlas archéologique de la Tunisie (1:50,000), Paris, 1892-1913 AAT II R. Cagnat and A. Merlin, Atlas archéologique de la Tunisie (1:100,000), Paris, 1914-32 Names Grid Name Period Modern Name / Location Reference D1 A(...) RL Ksar Mdoudja AAT II, 30.133 H2 Acholla HRL Ras Botria Desanges 1980, 306 A2 Ad Aquas Caesaris RL Youks ALG AAA 28.253 B1 Ad Arvalla? RL near Koudiat-es-Snouber AAA 19.159 ALG F4 (Ad) Oleastrum? RL Henchir-Ferchatt-Zabouza Trousset 1992 F2 Aeliae? RL Henchir-Mraba ItAnt 55.4; AAT I, 73.19-20 G1 Aggar? HR? Henchir-Maklouba AAT I, 74.41; EncBerb 2 E1 Agger HRL Henchir-Sidi-Amara or AAT II, 30.262; Sebaï 1988; EncBerb 2 Henchir-el-Khima Aggar B2 Ain-Bou-Driès RL ALG AAA 40.62; Pringle 1981, 178-79 C1 Ain-el-Hamedna R? AAT II, 35.113 E1 Ain-es-Sif RL AAT I, 48.31-32 H1 Alipota?/ H/ Salakta Tissot 1888, 176; AAT I, 74.49 Gummi RL? C1 Althiburos HRL Medeina / Mdeina AAT II, 29.97 B1 Ammaedara RL Haidra AAT II, 40.5; Lepelley 1981, 64-68; EncBerb 4 H2 Ammonos Balithonos HR/ Ras Kapoudia EncBerb 12 Caput Vada Akra/ Caput Vada L § Brachodes Akra Ptol. 4.3.2 E1 Aquae Regiae RL AAT I, 63.43-44 (near); Lancel 1991, 1311-12 B1 Ardalius fl.
  • The First Punic War, 264 to 241 B.C

    The First Punic War, 264 to 241 B.C

    Carthage Scenario Book V2.0 July, 2013 VOLUME #2 of THE ANCIENT WORLD SERIES A RICHARD H. BERG GAME DESIGN SCENARIO BOOK Version 2.0 July, 203 T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S CR .0 Introduction ................................................... 2 7.6 Naval Transport ........................................... 2 CR 2.0 Components ................................................... 2 7.7 Port Harbor Capacity and Winter ................ 22 CR 2. The Maps ................................................ 2 CR 8.0 Land Combat ................................................. 23 CR 2.2 Counters ................................................. 2 CR 9.0 Cities and Sieges ............................................ 23 CR 2.3 Player Aids ............................................. 4 CR 0.0 Manpower .................................................... 24 CR 3.0 The Sequence of Play .................................... 4 10. Raising Legions ......................................... 24 The Roman Political and Command System ............ 5 10.2 Placement of Roman Manpower ............... 25 CR 5. The Magistrates of Rome ....................... 5 10.3 Legion Training ......................................... 25 CR 5.2 Elections and Assignment of Magistrates . 7 10.4 Carthaginian Manpower ............................ 25 CR 5.3 Prorogue of Imperium ............................ 10 10.5 Carthaginian Army Efficiency ................... 26 CR 5.4 Magistrate Restrictions .......................... 10 CR 2.0 Diplomacy ..................................................
  • Ricaines Antiquités Africaines 52 | 2016 Table Des Matières 52 | 2016 52 | 2016

    Ricaines Antiquités Africaines 52 | 2016 Table Des Matières 52 | 2016 52 | 2016

    Antiquités africaines Antiquités africaines 2016 52 | 52 | 2016 Table des matières 52 | 2016 In memoriam Profesor Doctor José María Blázquez Martínez (1926-2016), par Enrique Gozalbes Cravioto ..........................................................................................................................5 Sami BEN TAHAR, Henchir Tawrirt (Jerba) : un site libyque aux origines protohistoriques .............................9 L’Afrique du Nord Mustapha JAOUHARI, Une nouvelle inscription libyque découverte à Makhfi, près de Tanger .....................53 Touatia A MRAOUI, Les artisans africains : étude sociale et organisation du travail ........................................59 Jean-Pierre DARMON, Suzanne GOZLAN, Une tige végétale dans la mosaïque africaine : de la protohistoire millet ou roseau ? ................................................................................................................................................81 Danièle FOY, Les Thermes du Levant à Leptis Magna : les verres (IIe-VIe siècles), avec une annexe de Bernard GRATUZE, Analyses de deux verres des Thermes du Levant ......................................................95 à la conquête arabe David L. STONE, The Jetty with Platform: A Distinctive Port Structure from North Africa ....................125 DOSSIER : « CÉRAMIQUES DE L’AFRIQUE ROMAINE ET COLLECTIONS ANCIENNES » Alessia CONTINO, Claudio CAPELLI, Marina MILELLA, Francesco PACETTI, Lucrezia UNGARO, Michel BONIFAY, L’anfora « Dressel 26 » del Castro Pretorio ..................................................................................................145
  • A Roman Terra Sigillata Dish from Tunisia, in Leyden By

    A Roman Terra Sigillata Dish from Tunisia, in Leyden By

    A ROMAN TERRA SIGILLATA DISH FROM TUNISIA, IN LEYDEN BY J. H. C. KERN The Roman terra sigillata dish reproduced on Plate I, was acquired by the Leyden Antiquities Museum as early as The piece is definitely known to come from Tunisia, where it was picked up, together with a large haul of other Roman ceramics, I by the Dutch colonel J. E. Humbert, when the latter was working in the service of the Bey of Tunis, in the years 1822-1823. From a rapid conspectus of the enormous wealth of Humbert's manuscripts and files on Tunisia which are kept in the archives of the Leyden Museum, it appears beyond doubt that a large number of Roman ceramics, including our dish, were found in the course of occasional diggings practised by Humbert at one well- defined place in the kingdom of the Bey. This locality is given by Humbert as Sursef, with the appended identification-equally Humbert's-that this is the ancient Sarsura. The Sursef locale certainly has a good deal of problems in store for present-day research. However, Humbert defined the area of Sursef as being situated between Sousse (ancient Hadrumetum) and Sfax (ancient Taparura), i.e., towns at 144 and 320 km. due south of Tunis respectively. That leaves us with at least some means for narrowing down the actual find-spot from the given sources. My own guess is that Sursef stands for modern Ksour Es Saf, the latter being described as a sizable village situated 30 km. north-east of El Djem (ancient Thysdrus) 2).
  • Monica Hellstrom Dissertation Final

    Monica Hellstrom Dissertation Final

    Public Construction under Diocletian A Study of State Involvement in Construction in Roman Era Towns in Present Day Tunisia and Eastern Algeria. Monica Hellström Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy under the Executive Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2014 © 2013 Monica Hellström All rights reserved ABSTRACT Public Construction under Diocletian. A study of State Involvement in Construction in Roman Era Towns in Present Day Tunisia and Eastern Algeria. Monica Hellström This study traces the development of building inscriptions in Roman North Africa, in order to understand the rich epigraphic record testifying to public construction during the reign of Diocletian. In particular, it examines the role of the imperial government in construction, both in how it itself built and how it related to locals who did. Treating construction as a form of communication between builder and society, I have examined the claims made by the state as it took on the role of builder, and to what social groups these claims were directed. A wide approach has been called for to understand the role played by public construction – and by broadcasting it through inscriptions – for the negotiation of influence in the province. I have examined the activities of both imperial and local builders, which has revealed well defined conventions as to what and where to build, and how to communicate it. Against this backdrop, I have traced the relations of the Diocletianic government to a number of social strata, as expressed through building inscriptions, from rural entrepreneurs and small town councilors to Carthaginian senators.
  • Populations of Byzacène

    Populations of Byzacène

    Populations of Byzacène Concerning the Etymology of the Name of Thyna Revue Tunisienne, 1908 Our colleague Mr. J. Bureau, of Sfax, occupies himself with passion on the question of Thyna. The report published in this number of the Revue Tunisienne and the conference that he conducted at the Institute of Carthage are testimony of this activity. In an article by the same author published in the Dépêche Tunisienne of April 5, we read the following sentence: “Mr. Merlin is persuaded that Thyna is truly a Roman city, but he believes perhaps that the Roman city was built on the ruins of a Punic city. The name of Thenae would be an indication of this origin, th being found in a quantity of Punic names. Nevertheless, until now, nothing has been found which can confirm the idea put forward by Mr. Merlin and which hasalready been made by a scientist member of the Institute of Carthage, Mr. Noel.” No one pays more homage than me to the scientific value of our two colleagues. Nevertheless, I would make a point of warning them against a disease which prevails on many archaeologists in North Africa. One could call it Phoenicio-mania . In this case, I believe that they suffered this complaint. Let me explain on what my understanding is based. If th is in punic names, this letter is also in the dialects of Europe. A European term dhâna , which is found in Sanskrit and in Zend, means “the place where one is established”. This term is found in the Greek “who is in good situation”.