DOCSLIB.ORG

Oral History Interview – 8/13/1964 Administrative Information

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Oral History Interview – 8/13/1964 Administrative Information Richardson Dilworth Oral History Interview – 8/13/1964 Administrative Information Creator: Richardson Dilworth Interviewer: Henry W. Sawyer, III Date of Interview: August 13, 1964 Place of Interview: Length: 27 pages Biographical Note Dilworth, Mayor of Philadelphia from 1955-1962 and co-chairman of Pennsylvania Citizens for Kennedy in 1960, discusses his personal impressions of JFK, the 1960 primary and presidential campaigns in Pennsylvania, and JFK’s work on urban affairs, among other issues. Access Open. Usage Restrictions According to the deed of gift signed April 10, 1972, copyright of these materials has been assigned to the United States Government. Copyright The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excesses of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. The copyright law extends its protection to unpublished works from the moment of creation in a tangible form. Direct your questions concerning copyright to the reference staff. Transcript of Oral History Interview These electronic documents were created from transcripts available in the research room of the John F. Kennedy Library. The transcripts were scanned using optical character recognition and the resulting text files were proofread against the original transcripts. Some formatting changes were made. Page numbers are noted where they would have occurred at the bottoms of the pages of the original transcripts. If researchers have any concerns about accuracy, they are encouraged to visit the Library and consult the transcripts and the interview recordings. Suggested Citation Richardson Dilworth, recorded interview by Henry W. Sawyer, III, August 13, 1964, (page number), John F. Kennedy Library Oral History Program. RICHARDSON DILWORTH Table of Contents Page Topic 1 First meeting with John F. Kennedy 3 Kennedy and Urban Renewal 4 Speech in Philadelphia 5 Speech to American Municipal Association Convention in Denver 6 Relationship with the Americans for Democratic Action (ADA) in Philadelphia 8 ADA Support of Adlai Stevenson 10 Pennsylvania delegation voting for Kennedy 15 Excellence of Kennedy campaign organization and staff 16 1960 Democratic National Convention 17 Relationship of Senator Joseph Clark and Robert F. Kennedy 18 Debate against Lyndon B. Johnson 19 Kennedy-Nixon Debates 20 Trip to Philadelphia during the 1960 presidential campaign 23 Margin of victory in Philadelphia 24 Dilworth’s meetings with President Kennedy regarding Urban Affairs 25 Potential of Kennedy’s second term Oral History Interview With RICHARDSON DILWORTH August 13, 1964 By Henry W. Sawyer, III For the John F. Kennedy Library SAWYER: This is an interview of Richardson Dilworth being conducted as part of the oral history project for the John F. Kennedy Library. Mr. Dilworth, will you introduce yourself, please? DILWORTH: Well, I am 65 years of age. I was in politics at one time for a period of about 17 years, commencing in 1947, and what I would like to think of as reform Democratic politics which eventually resulted in ousting the entrenched Republican machine here in the city. I was first elected as a City Treasurer after an unsuccessful campaign for Mayor in 1947, and was elected City Treasurer in 1949, District Attorney 1951, Mayor of the City in 1955, and re-elected in 1959. Before going into active politics that been sort of a hobby, I also had been a practicing lawyer in Philadelphia since 1927. I am a native of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, but I have lived in Philadelphia ever since I graduated from Yale Law School. The first contact--- SAWYER: Excuse me, may I interrupt? DILWORTH: I beg your pardon. SAWYER: The interview is being conducted by Henry W. Sawyer, III. I am a Philadelphia lawyer and I was elected as a Councilman-at-Large of the City of Philadelphia in 1955 and served for four years in the City Council at the time Mr. Dilworth was Mayor. You go ahead, Mr. Dilworth, and perhaps you can tell us when you first met John F. Kennedy. [-1-] DILWORTH: Thank you, Henry. It is a great pleasure to be introduced—to be interviewed by Henry Sawyer because certainly he was one of the younger men who did a tremendous amount in the reform movement. He gave up a lot by becoming a Councilman in the city and did a yeoman’s job there for four years, and ever since has continued to be not only in reform politics, but in very many things that have helped preserve the dignity and independence of the individual citizen. The first time I ever met Jack Kennedy – and I like to think of him as that – was in 1956. Shortly after I was elected Mayor I went down to Washington on behalf of certain legislation for the development of urban areas and he was one of the Senators that I was asked to contact. I was tremendously struck by him. I heard a great deal about him as I went to school up in New England—went to boarding school outside of Boston and to Yale University. I had many friends up in the Boston area and I had heard a great deal about him and was anxious to meet him. I was tremendously struck by his charm, also by his intellectualism, and finally, by his toughness. It seemed to me that it was an amazing combination that he had. I think he was a genuine intellectual and at the same time he loved politics and I mean real rough and tumble politics. He was extremely skillful at it and he had an enormous amount of toughness—toughness of fiber— which it always seemed to me is essential if you are going to have a successful political career. Also, I always thought that he had amazingly good political judgment. He had, of course, been raised in a very political family. I then – when I would go back to Washington, which was several times a month the entire time that I was Mayor, I would always make it a point to stop in and see him. I never got to know him intimately, but I got to know him reasonably well. We [-2-] were on a first name basis and it was always an enormous pleasure to see him because his conversation was tremendously stimulating, whether he was talking about intellectual things or whether he was talking about political things and he also had, of course, a delightful – almost pixie-ish—if that is not too bad a word—sense of humor; one of the best quiet sense of humors I have ever seen, a great master of sort of understatement type of sense of humor. The next really important contact, however – SAYWER: Early in ’56, I was going to ask you whether—what his position in terms of urban renewal was? Was he one of the Senators who was more interested or less interested in that problem because I know that is the one which you generally were in Washington for—that was your general concern—for various programs for urban renewal and mass transit and the like. DILWORTH: That is right, Henry. Well, he was – coming from an urban area and being a very urban person—a very civilized, sophisticated person—was tremendously interested in the urban problem. He realized that this is an urban civilization, will be increasingly so all through this century and that very drastic steps had to be taken if we were to meet the challenge of this urban civilization. I think what always particularly impressed him—not only was he in favor of urban legislation but he was really fussy about the kind of legislation. It had to be good legislation. It had to make sense. He just was not for any kind of urban legislation that the mayors might be in favor of. He really put it right through the strainer and one of the things that always made it a pleasure to talk to him, I thought, was that he wanted to make sure that the approach that was taken was the soundest possible approach. I always [-3-] felt very strongly that at any time you ever talked to him, while he was a very political animal, that at least I never knew him to get behind legislation that he didn’t think was really sound. Speaking of his sense of humor, one of the things that I remember was that he came up in 1956 to speak at the annual $100 dinner in Philadelphia and by that time those dinners had gotten up to around 4,000 people and was held in the Convention Hall and I think many of the people sort of resented the battering they had taken into showing up and the result was that by the time the speakers came on—and there would always be all kinds of minor speakers and hours of introductions—the crowd would be quite gru—quite resentful and – SAWYER: And wondered if they got their $100 worth? DILWORTH: Yes. And wandering about and talking, and many of them leaving the hall, and when they finally got around to the then Senator Kennedy I suppose there had been 100 introductions, there had been at least 10 minor Democrats speak and his words, when he got up, were that he said that to paraphrase Winston Churchill, “that never had spoken to so few who listened,” but he had an important--- SAWYER: Marvelous, because that was—that is strictly a ward-leaders and ward leaders’ friends and committeemen and every one else who can be bludgeoned into getting there for $100 – just to put it into context- and I do remember that in that sort of thing it was particularly a problem at the back of the hall.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • George M. Leader, 1918-2013 Michael J
    Gettysburg College Faculty Books 2014 George M. Leader, 1918-2013 Michael J. Birkner Gettysburg College Charles H. Glatfelter Gettysburg College Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/books Part of the Cultural History Commons, Oral History Commons, Public History Commons, Social History Commons, and the United States History Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Birkner, Michael J. and Charles H. Glatfelter. George M. Leader, 1918-2013. Musselman Library, 2014. Second Edition. This is the publisher's version of the work. This publication appears in Gettysburg College's institutional repository by permission of the copyright owner for personal use, not for redistribution. Cupola permanent link: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/books/78 This open access book is brought to you by The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The uC pola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. George M. Leader, 1918-2013 Description George M. Leader (1918-2013), a native of York, Pennsylvania, rose from the anonymous status of chicken farmer's son and Gettysburg College undergraduate to become, first a State Senator, and then the 36th governor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. A steadfast liberal in a traditionally conservative state, Leader spent his brief time in the governor's office (1955-1959) fighting uphill battles and blazing courageous trails. He overhauled the state's corrupt patronage system; streamlined and humanized its mental health apparatus; and, when a black family moved into the white enclave of Levittown, took a brave stand in favor of integration.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Reelism: a Rhetorical Criticism of Reflection and Interpretation in Political Films
    POLITICAL REELISM: A RHETORICAL CRITICISM OF REFLECTION AND INTERPRETATION IN POLITICAL FILMS Jennifer Lee Walton A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2006 Committee: John J. Makay, Advisor Richard Gebhardt Graduate Faculty Representative John T. Warren Alberto Gonzalez ii ABSTRACT John J. Makay, Advisor The purpose of this study is to discuss how political campaigns and politicians have been depicted in films, and how the films function rhetorically through the use of core values. By interpreting real life, political films entertain us, perhaps satirically poking fun at familiar people and events. However, the filmmakers complete this form of entertainment through the careful integration of American values or through the absence of, or attack on those values. This study provides a rhetorical criticism of movies about national politics, with a primary focus on the value judgments, political consciousness and political implications surrounding the films Mr. Smith Goes to Washington (1939), The Candidate (1972), The Contender (2000), Wag the Dog (1997), Power (1986), and Primary Colors (1998). iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank everyone who made this endeavor possible. First and foremost, I thank Doctor John J. Makay; my committee chair, for believing in me from the start, always encouraging me to do my best, and assuring me that I could do it. I could not have done it without you. I wish to thank my committee members, Doctors John Warren and Alberto Gonzalez, for all of your support and advice over the past months.
    [Show full text]
  • TUESDAY, M Y 1, 1962 the President Met with the Following of The
    TUESDAY, MAYMYI,1, 1962 9:459:45 -- 9:50 am The PrePresidentsident met with the following of the Worcester Junior Chamber of CommeCommerce,rce, MasMassachusettssachusetts in the Rose Garden: Don Cookson JJamesarne s Oulighan Larry Samberg JeffreyJeffrey Richard JohnJohn Klunk KennethKenneth ScScottott GeorgeGeorge Donatello EdwardEdward JaffeJaffe RichardRichard MulhernMulhern DanielDaniel MiduszenskiMiduszenski StazrosStazros GaniaGaniass LouiLouiss EdmondEdmond TheyThey werewere accorrpaccompaniedanied by CongresCongressmansman HaroldHarold D.D. DonohueDonohue - TUESDAY,TUESbAY J MAY 1, 1962 8:45 atn LEGISLATIVELEGI~LATIVE LEADERS BREAKFAST The{['he Vice President Speaker John W. McCormackMcCortnack Senator Mike Mansfield SenatorSenato r HubertHube rt HumphreyHUInphrey Senator George SmatherStnathers s CongressmanCongresstnan Carl Albert CongressmanCongresstnan Hale BoggBoggs s Hon. Lawrence O'Brien Hon. Kenneth O'Donnell0 'Donnell Hon. Pierre Salinger Hon. Theodore Sorensen 9:35 amatn The President arrived in the office. (See insert opposite page) 10:32 - 10:55 amatn The President mettnet with a delegation fromfrotn tktre Friends'Friends I "Witness for World Order": Henry J. Cadbury, Haverford, Pa. Founder of the AmericanAtnerican Friends Service CommitteeCOtntnittee ( David Hartsough, Glen Mills, Pennsylvania Senior at Howard University Mrs. Dorothy Hutchinson, Jenkintown, Pa. Opening speaker, the Friends WitnessWitnes~ for World Order Mr. Samuel Levering, Arararat, Virginia Chairman of the Board on Peace and.and .... Social Concerns Edward F. Snyder, College Park, Md. Executive Secretary of the Friends Committe on National Legislation George Willoughby, Blackwood Terrace, N. J. Member of the crew of the Golden Rule (ship) and the San Francisco to Moscow Peace Walk (Hon. McGeorgeMkGeorge Bundy) (General Chester V. Clifton 10:57 - 11:02 am (Congre(Congresswomansswoman Edith Green, Oregon) OFF TRECO 11:15 - 11:58 am H.
    [Show full text]
  • Divide and Dissent: Kentucky Politics, 1930-1963
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Political History History 1987 Divide and Dissent: Kentucky Politics, 1930-1963 John Ed Pearce Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Pearce, John Ed, "Divide and Dissent: Kentucky Politics, 1930-1963" (1987). Political History. 3. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_political_history/3 Divide and Dissent This page intentionally left blank DIVIDE AND DISSENT KENTUCKY POLITICS 1930-1963 JOHN ED PEARCE THE UNIVERSITY PRESS OF KENTUCKY Publication of this volume was made possible in part by a grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities. Copyright © 1987 by The University Press of Kentucky Paperback edition 2006 The University Press of Kentucky Scholarly publisher for the Commonwealth, serving Bellarmine University, Berea College, Centre College of Kentucky, Eastern Kentucky University, The Filson Historical Society, Georgetown College, Kentucky Historical Society, Kentucky State University, Morehead State University, Murray State University, Northern Kentucky University,Transylvania University, University of Kentucky, University of Louisville, and Western Kentucky University. All rights reserved. Editorial and Sales Qffices: The University Press of Kentucky 663 South Limestone Street, Lexington, Kentucky 40508-4008 www.kentuckypress.com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Pearce,John Ed. Divide and dissent. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Kentucky-Politics and government-1865-1950.
    [Show full text]
  • IV. Fabric Summary 282 Copyrighted Material
    Eastern State Penitentiary HSR: IV. Fabric Summary 282 IV. FABRIC SUMMARY: CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATIONS, AND USES OF SPACE (for documentation, see Appendices A and B, by date, and C, by location) Jeffrey A. Cohen § A. Front Building (figs. C3.1 - C3.19) Work began in the 1823 building season, following the commencement of the perimeter walls and preceding that of the cellblocks. In August 1824 all the active stonecutters were employed cutting stones for the front building, though others were idled by a shortage of stone. Twenty-foot walls to the north were added in the 1826 season bounding the warden's yard and the keepers' yard. Construction of the center, the first three wings, the front building and the perimeter walls were largely complete when the building commissioners turned the building over to the Board of Inspectors in July 1829. The half of the building east of the gateway held the residential apartments of the warden. The west side initially had the kitchen, bakery, and other service functions in the basement, apartments for the keepers and a corner meeting room for the inspectors on the main floor, and infirmary rooms on the upper story. The latter were used at first, but in September 1831 the physician criticized their distant location and lack of effective separation, preferring that certain cells in each block be set aside for the sick. By the time Demetz and Blouet visited, about 1836, ill prisoners were separated rather than being placed in a common infirmary, and plans were afoot for a group of cells for the sick, with doors left ajar like others.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Urban History
    Journal of Urban History http://juh.sagepub.com/ ''From Protest to Politics'' : Community Control and Black Independent Politics in Philadelphia, 1965-1984 Matthew J. Countryman Journal of Urban History 2006 32: 813 DOI: 10.1177/0096144206289034 The online version of this article can be found at: http://juh.sagepub.com/content/32/6/813 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com On behalf of: The Urban History Association Additional services and information for Journal of Urban History can be found at: Email Alerts: http://juh.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://juh.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations: http://juh.sagepub.com/content/32/6/813.refs.html Downloaded from juh.sagepub.com at Harvard Libraries on March 22, 2011 “FROM PROTEST TO POLITICS” Community Control and Black Independent Politics in Philadelphia, 1965-1984 MATTHEW J. COUNTRYMAN University of Michigan This article traces the origins of black independent electoral activism in Philadelphia during the 1970s to the Black Power movement of the 1960s. Specifically, it argues that Black Power activists in Philadelphia turned to electoral strategies to consolidate their efforts to achieve community control over public insti- tutions in the city’s black working-class neighborhoods. Finally, the article concludes with a brief evalu- ation of the careers of African American activist state legislators David Richardson and Roxanne Jones and W. Wilson Goode, Philadelphia’s first African American mayor. Keywords: Black Power; community control; independent politics; Democratic Party The political philosophy of black nationalism means that the black man should control the politics and politicians in his own community.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Cold War and the Second Red Scare on the 1952 American Presidential Election
    Eastern Kentucky University Encompass Online Theses and Dissertations Student Scholarship January 2019 The Impact of the Cold War and the Second Red Scare on the 1952 American Presidential Election Dana C. Johns Eastern Kentucky University Follow this and additional works at: https://encompass.eku.edu/etd Part of the Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Johns, Dana C., "The Impact of the Cold War and the Second Red Scare on the 1952 American Presidential Election" (2019). Online Theses and Dissertations. 594. https://encompass.eku.edu/etd/594 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at Encompass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Online Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Encompass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STATEMENT OF PERMISSION TO USE In thispresenting thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Master of Arts degree at Eastern Kentucky University, I agree that the Library shall make it available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this document are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgements of the source are made. Permission for extensive quotation from or reproduction of this document may be granted by my major professor. In [his/her] absence, by the Head oflnterlibrary Services when, in the opinion of either, the proposed use of the material is for scholarly purposes. Any copying or use of the material in this document for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Signature: X Date: q/ \ \ 9/ \ THE IMPACT OF THE COLD WAR AND THE SECOND RED SCARE ON THE 1952 AMERICAN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION BY DANA JOHNS Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Eastern Kentucky University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS 2019 © Copyright by DANA JOHNS 2019 All Rights Reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Politics Adrian Daub Stanford University Michael Thomas Taylor Reed College
    Introduction: Family Politics Adrian Daub Stanford University Michael Thomas Taylor Reed College he exclusion of the family from proper politics goes back to the very origins of Western political theory. In Plato’s Republic, Socrates infamously proposed abolishing private households and family relations among the Guardians of childbearing age, in Torder to breed and rear better citizen-soldiers bound by familial ties of affection and duty to the body politic.1 Less radically, perhaps, Aristotle’s Politics found in the oikos a form of community or common life enabling men to act freely and live well as citizens of the polis. The household’s proper nature, however, was a private sphere of privation, as Hannah Arendt most influentially underscored, where menial, commercial, and creaturely concerns of reproduction and sustain- ability outweighed lofty political considerations.2 For a vision of what happened if the family were allowed to dominate politics, Athenians looked to kingdoms like Sparta or Macedon. Thucydides, the general and historian of the Peloponnesian Wars, presented the dynasty as a wanton disequilibration of the natural politi- cal order, by which one family imposed its power through a state of exception.3 These theorists taught a long-lasting lesson: family and politics were not supposed to have anything to do with each other, and if they did, it was a sign of a malfunctioning polity. Families constituted threats to peace and justice, and separating families from politics meant distinguishing legitimate from illegitimate uses of power—inwardly over citizens and dependents, and outwardly against ene- mies of the state. 1 Plato, The Republic, 457c–d.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Evaluating the Design of the Richardson Dilworth House
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 2013 Go with the Faux: Re-Evaluating the Design of the Richardson Dilworth House Chelsea Elizabeth Troppauer University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Troppauer, Chelsea Elizabeth, "Go with the Faux: Re-Evaluating the Design of the Richardson Dilworth House" (2013). Theses (Historic Preservation). 213. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/213 Suggested Citation: Troppauer, Chelsea Elizabeth (2013). Go with the Faux: Re-Evaluating the Design of the Richardson Dilworth House. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/213 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Go with the Faux: Re-Evaluating the Design of the Richardson Dilworth House Abstract When elected to the office of Philadelphia's Mayor in 1956, Richardson Dilworth pledged his administration's dedication towards the physical improvement of Philadelphia. The Mayor made the revitalization of southeast quadrant of the city's core, known as Society Hill, a priority during his administration. As a symbol of his commitment, Dilworth decided to move himself and his family to the neighborhood. The Dilworths commissioned restoration architect, G. Edwin Brumbaugh. Brumbaugh designed a three and a half story, single family Colonial Revival house on the former site of two, 1840s structures. Dilworth resided in the house until his death in 1974. Discussions pertaining to the site's significance have focused narrowly on the building's associations, rather than the physical structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Monmouth University Poll NEW JERSEY: PARTY-SWITCHING
    Please attribute this information to: Monmouth University Poll West Long Branch, NJ 07764 www.monmouth.edu/polling Follow on Twitter: @MonmouthPoll _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Released: Contact: Monday, October 5, 2020 PATRICK MURRAY 732-979-6769 (cell); 732-263-5858 (office) [email protected] Follow on Twitter: @PollsterPatrick NEW JERSEY: PARTY-SWITCHING CD02 INCUMBENT TRAILS Dems lead for US House, Senate and President West Long Branch, NJ – The Democratic challenger has an edge against the previously Democratic incumbent in New Jersey’s 2nd Congressional District. The Monmouth (“Mon-muth”) University Poll finds that Jeff Van Drew’s party switch is more of an issue for district voters than Amy Kennedy’s famous in-laws. The two candidates are on basically equal footing when it comes to understanding the needs of South Jersey. In the presidential election, this district flipped from Democrat in 2012 to Republican in 2016, and it looks like it might flip back again next month. Among all registered voters, Kennedy is supported by 49% and Van Drew is supported by 44%. Another 1% say they will support a third party candidate and 5% are undecided. Among likely voters in a high turnout scenario, Kennedy holds a 50% to 44% edge. She maintains that lead in a lower turnout model with 51% supporting her to 44% for Van Drew. It should be noted that these leads are all within the survey’s margin of error. Kennedy holds a 94% to 1% advantage among Democratic voters while Van Drew has an 89% to 8% lead among his now-fellow Republicans. Independents prefer Kennedy by a 50% to 40% margin.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania
    THE Penns ylvania Magazine OF HISTORY AND BIOGRAPHY VOLUME CXXVII Thefistorical Society of PennsylVania 1300 LOCUST STREET, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19107 2003 CONTENTS ARTICLES Page "To Stand Out in Heresy". Lucretia Mott, Liberty, and the Hysterical Woman Nancy Isenberg 7 To Render the Private Public: William Still and the Selling of The Underground Rail Road Stephen G. Hall 35 Reform in Philadelphia:JosephS. Clark, Richardson Dilworth, and the Women Who Made Reform Possible, 1947-1949 G. Terry Madonna and John Morrison McLarnon III 57 "Such a Noise in the World": Copper Mines and an American Colonial Echo to the South Sea Bubble Wayne Bodle 131 "ExtraordinaiyFreedom and greatHumility -A Reinterpretationof Deborah Franklin Jennifer Reed Fry 167 Rethinking Northern White Support for the African Colonization Movement: The Pennsylvania Colonization Society as an Agent of Emancipation Eric Burin 197 Freedom of Association in the Early Republic: The Republican Party, the Whiskey Rebellion, and the Philadelphiaand New York Cordwainers'Cases Johann N. Neem 259 "The Insanities of an Exalted Imagination'. The Troubled First Geological Survey of Pennsylvania Francis P. Boscoe 291 Civic Physiques:Public Images of Workers in Pittsburgh, 1800--1910 Edward Slavishak 309 FragmentedNationalism: Right-Wing Responses to September 11 in HistoricalContext Matthew N. Lyons 377 NOTES AND DOCUMENTS New Light on the Dark Lantern: The Initiation Rites and Ceremonies of a Know-Nothing Lodge in Shippensburg, Pennsylvania Mark Dash 89 The State of Pennsylvania:As Seen by Traugott Bromine Richard L. Bland 419 EDITORIALS Tamara Gaskell Miller 3,375 BOOK REVIEWS 101,231,339,429 INDEX Conrad Woodall 461 THE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICERS Chair COLLIN F.
    [Show full text]
  • Race, Reaction, and Reform: the Three Rs of Philadelphia School Politics, 1965-1971 Author(S): Jon S
    Race, Reaction, and Reform: The Three Rs of Philadelphia School Politics, 1965-1971 Author(s): Jon S. Birger Source: The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, Vol. 120, No. 3 (Jul., 1996), pp. 163-216 Published by: The Historical Society of Pennsylvania Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20093045 . Accessed: 22/03/2011 22:11 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at . http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=hsp. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Historical Society of Pennsylvania is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography.
    [Show full text]