New Genera and Species of Idiocerine Leafhoppers (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) from India, Sri Lanka and Myanmar

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Genera and Species of Idiocerine Leafhoppers (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) from India, Sri Lanka and Myanmar Biosystematica ISSN: 0973-7871(online) New Genera and Species of Idiocerine Leafhoppers (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) from India, Sri Lanka and Myanmar C.A. VIRAKTAMATH Department of Entomology, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bangalore 560 065, India Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT - Five genera of Idiocerinae, Burmascopus gen. nov. (type species: Idiocerus fasciolatus Distant) from Myanmar, Ceylonoscopus gen. nov. (type species: Ceylonoscopus quadripunctatus sp. nov.), Lankacerus gen. nov. (type species: Lankacerus rotundus sp. nov.), Neoscopus sp. nov. (type species: Neoscopus ceylonensis sp. nov) all three from Sri Lanka and Nilgiriscopus gen. nov. (type species: Niligiriscopus transversus sp. nov.) from south India are described and the type species are described and illustrated. A key to the known idiocerine genera of the Indian subcontinent is also provided. KEY WORDS - Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Idiocerinae, new genus, key, India, Sri Lanka, Myanmar Introduction and Viraktamath (1998) revised the genus from the subcontinent. Maldonado-Capriles (1961, 1970) revised The Idiocerinae is a small subfamily of the leafhopper the genus Balocha (type species Balocha tricolor family Cicadellidae distributed in all the zoogeographic Distant) and Kameswara Rao & Ramakrishnan (1979) regions. The leafhoppers of the subfamily are recognized described two species from India. Maldonado-Capriles by the following set of characters. Head wider than (1964) in addition to transferring a number of species pronotum, ocelli on face, as far apart from each other earlier placed in Idiocerus to Idioscopus, revised the as they are from adjacent eye; facial sutures extending genus Busonia and described the genera Busoniomimus beyond antennal pits; distance between antennal bases (Maldonado-Capriles, 1977) and Paraidioscopus greater than that between ocelli; pronotum with short, (Maldonado-Capriles, 1964). Viraktamath & Sohi (1994) rounded lateral margins; forewing with large appendix; showed the occurrence of the true species of the genus hind wing with four apical closed cells. Idiocerus from the Sub-Himalayan region. Two genera Distant (1908, 1916) treated species of Idiocerinae with rugose pronotum, Tasnimocerus Ghauri (1975) from the Indian subcontinent in the genera Idiocerus (type species: Tasnimocerus clypeatus Ghauri) and Lewis, Balocha Distant and Busonia Distant. Baker Jogocerus Viraktamath (1979a) (type species: (1915) established the genus Idioscopus (type species: Jogocerus freytagi Viraktamath) were described. Idiocerus clypealis Lethierry) and Viraktamath (1973, Viraktamath and Parvathi (2002) described the genus 1976, 1979a, 1979b) added species to this genus from Periacerus (type species; Idioscopus lalithae the subcontinent. Anufriev (1970) described the genus Viraktamath). At present 10 genera and 43 species are Amritodus (type species: Idiocerus atkinsoni Lethierry) known to occur in the subcontinent. © Prof. T.C. Narenderan Trust for Animal Taxonomy Biosystematica, 2007, 1(1): 21-30 http://www.tcntrust.org/journal.php 21 22 C.A. VIRAKTAMATH In the Indian subcontinent Idiocerinae breed on trees - Clypellus narrower at base compared to apex; and shrubs. Most species of the genera Idioscopus and aedeagus with well developed dorsal apodeme; Amritodus use species of Anacardiaceae as breeding pygophore with a ventral process ........................ hosts (Viraktamath, 1989), whereas those of Balocha ........................................ Jogocerus Viraktamath use species of Sizygium of the family Myrtaceae 6. Face with frontal suture beyond antennal pit .... 7 (Viraktamath unpublished)) and those of Idiocerus use Cedrus (Coniferae) (Viraktamath & Sohi, 1994). At least - Face without frontal sutures beyond antennal pits; three species of Idioscopus and two species of Amritodus inner apical cell very large....... Busonia Distant are pestiferous on mango (Mangifera indica L.) 7. Forewing with third apical cell stalked (Viraktamath, 1989). Busoniomimus manjunathi (pedunculate); breeding on plants of the genus Viraktamath & Viraktamath causes damage to Garcinia Sizygium .................................. Balocha Distant combogia (Mathew et al. 2002). - Forewing without stalked apical cells .............. 8 Examination of leafhoppers in the Natural History Museum, London (BMNH) and U.S. National Museum 8. Hind femoral spinulation 2+1 ........................... 9 of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, - Hind femoral spinulation 2+0 ..... Idiocrus Lewis D.C. USA (USNM) from south India, Sri Lanka and Myanmar revealed the presence of new genera and 9. Male pygophore with triangular projection on species which are described and illustrated here. ventral margin; aedeagus pustulate...................... ...................Busoniamimus Maldonado-Capriles - Male pygophore and aedeagus not as above ... 10 Key to Idiocerine genera of the Indian subcontinent 10. Male style with abbreviated apical apophysis (Fig. 8); aedeagus longer than style ............................. 1. Forewing without cross veins before apical cross ...................................... Burmascopus gen. nov. veins (Figs 36, 40) ............................................ 2 - Male style with elongate apical apophysis (Fig.14); - Forewing with at least one cross vein before aedeagus shorter than style .............................. 11 apical cross veins (Figs 5, 22) .......................... 3 11. Male subgenital plate with stouter short setae in 2. Clavus with one vein (Fig. 36); male pygophore and addition to hair-like setae (Fig. 11, 15)................ anal collar without processes (Figs 27) ............... ..................................... Ceylonoscopus gen. nov. ......................................... Lankacerus gen. nov. - Male subgenital plate with only long hair-like setae - Clavus with two veins; male pygophore and anal ......................................................................... 12 collar with processes (Fig. 39)............................. ............................................ Neoscopus gen. nov. 12. Male style apical apophysis with expanded processes laterally (Fig. 26) ................................. 3. Pronotum with transverse rugae ....................... 4 .................... Periacerus Viraktamath & Parvathi - Pronotum without transverse rugae .................. 6 - Male style with apical apophysis without such 4. Clypellus parallel sided (Fig. 64); both anal collar expansions ....................................................... 13 and pygophore without processes (Fig. 55)......... 13. Aedeagal shaft slender, sinuate (Fig. 54) ............ ........................................ Nilgiriscopus gen. nov. .................. Paraidioscopus Maldonado-Capriles - Clypellus either narrowed or widened at apex, not - Aedeagus not as above (Figs 24, 51) ............... 14 parallel sided; either anal collar or pygophore or both with processes ........................................... 5 14. Aedeagus with elongated preatrium, shaft comparatively short (Fig. 24, 25) ........................ 5. Clypellus broad at base; aedeagus with poorly ............................................. Amritodus Anufriev developed dorsal apodeme, pygophore without ventral process ................ Tasnimocerus Ghauri - Aedeagus without preatrium, shaft elongate (Fig. 51); if preatrium long, and shaft short, then apex of Biosystematica, 2007, 1(1) New Genera and Species of Idiocerine Leafhoppers 23 shaft is drawn out into a slender (Fig. 53), recurved MYANMAR [BMNH, examined]. process and style with a lateral tooth near apex (Fig. Sexually dimorphic. 52) ...........................................Idioscopus Baker Female. Ochraceous. Vertex with a stripe on either side of median line, brownish; a spot on anterior area on Burmascopus gen. nov. either side, visible in dorsal and ventral aspect, black. Face with brown stripe across ocelli, areas surrounding Type species: Idiocerus fasciolatus Distant 1908:186 each ocellus on outside margin whitish, a spot on either Ochraceous with brown markings, sexually dimorphic. side of inner lower margin, black. Lateral margins of Head broader than pronotum, shagreen. Face frontal suture below antennal pits, clypeus and inner shagreen. Ocelli closer to adjacent eyes than to each margin of genae along side, dark brown. Clypellus and other. Facial sulci reaching ocelli. Antennal ledges adjacent area on lower part of lora dark brown. prominent. Clypellus as broad at base as at apex, but narrowed at midlength. Lora slightly raised above level of genae. Labium extending beyond mesocoxae. A spine on each side of gena below eye. Pronotum and scutellum shagreen. Forewing with two subapical cells, inner subapical cell open behind, four apical cells, outer apical cell longest; clavus with two veins. Hind femoral spinulation 2+1. hind tibial spinulation R1 17-18, R2 6, R3 7-8. Hind basitarsus with three platellae. Male eighth sternite medially produced, lateral angles lobe-like. Male pygophore with basal anterior fracture, dorsal apodeme on anterior margin well developed with a ventral process. Anal collar with a process. Subgenital plate narrow, long, with marginal long hair-like setae. Style short, with subapical lobe absent, apical apophysis short directed caudally with a row of marginal setae on lateral margin of body and another row near apex. Connective with anterior margin trilobed, lateral margin concave. Aedeagus elongate, slender, preatrium longer than shaft, dorsal
Recommended publications
  • Taxa of Idiocerus Lewis New to Canada (Rhynchota: Homoptera: Cicadellidae) K
    J. EI\TOMOL. Soc. BRIT . COL UMBI A 82 (1985), DEC. 31 , 1985 59 TAXA OF IDIOCERUS LEWIS NEW TO CANADA (RHYNCHOTA: HOMOPTERA: CICADELLIDAE) K. C. A. HAMILTON Biosystematics Research Institude Research Branch, Agriculture Canada Ottawa, Ontario ABSTRACT Six new species and one new subspecies of Idiocerus are described: I. cabotlii from N.S., I. canae from Alberta, I. glacialis and I. indistinctus from B.C., and I. albolinea, I. musteus arsiniatus and I. setaceus, widespread east of the Cordilleran region. The identities of I. duzeei Provancher (N.S.-Ont.) and I. interruptus Gillette & Baker (N.S.-Colo.) are discussed, and these species are removed from synonymy. with black (Fig. 13); pleura yellow near wing bases, The Cicadellid tribe Idiocerini (subfamily black below; coxae black; legs tan; tegmina hyaline Idiocerinae of authors) is a large and complex with blackish veins interrupted by pale spots on in­ assembly of genera and species. The number of ner edges of basal and anteapical cells, and with genera is relatively small in the Holarctic, but the bold, pale spot on commiss ure at apices of first species feeding on Salix and Populus are numerous. claval veins. Beirne (1956) listed only 13 species and Freytag Female. Width 1.6-1.7 mm; length 4.6-5.2 mm . (1965) listed 19 of the 49 Nearctic species as occurr­ Form as in male, but antennae simple, ovipositor ing in Canada, all in the single genus Idiocerus extending one-quarter to one-fifth its length from Lewis. Since then, many additional species have pygofers, toothed as in I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Leafhoppers of Minnesota
    Technical Bulletin 155 June 1942 The Leafhoppers of Minnesota Homoptera: Cicadellidae JOHN T. MEDLER Division of Entomology and Economic Zoology University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station The Leafhoppers of Minnesota Homoptera: Cicadellidae JOHN T. MEDLER Division of Entomology and Economic Zoology University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Accepted for publication June 19, 1942 CONTENTS Page Introduction 3 Acknowledgments 3 Sources of material 4 Systematic treatment 4 Eurymelinae 6 Macropsinae 12 Agalliinae 22 Bythoscopinae 25 Penthimiinae 26 Gyponinae 26 Ledrinae 31 Amblycephalinae 31 Evacanthinae 37 Aphrodinae 38 Dorydiinae 40 Jassinae 43 Athysaninae 43 Balcluthinae 120 Cicadellinae 122 Literature cited 163 Plates 171 Index of plant names 190 Index of leafhopper names 190 2M-6-42 The Leafhoppers of Minnesota John T. Medler INTRODUCTION HIS bulletin attempts to present as accurate and complete a T guide to the leafhoppers of Minnesota as possible within the limits of the material available for study. It is realized that cer- tain groups could not be treated completely because of the lack of available material. Nevertheless, it is hoped that in its present form this treatise will serve as a convenient and useful manual for the systematic and economic worker concerned with the forms of the upper Mississippi Valley. In all cases a reference to the original description of the species and genus is given. Keys are included for the separation of species, genera, and supergeneric groups. In addition to the keys a brief diagnostic description of the important characters of each species is given. Extended descriptions or long lists of references have been omitted since citations to this literature are available from other sources if ac- tually needed (Van Duzee, 1917).
    [Show full text]
  • The Leafhoppers, Or Cicadellidae, of Illinois (Eurymelinae-Balcluthinae)
    BULLETIN of the ILLINOIS NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY HARLOW B. MILLS, Chief The Leafhoppers, or Cicadellidae, of Illinois (Eurymelinae-Balcluthinae) D. M. DELONG PriDted by Authority of the STATE OF ILLINOIS DWIGHT H. GREEN, Govtrnor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION FRANK G. THOMPSON, Dirtctor STATE t) F I 1. I, I N O I S DwiGiiT H. CiREES', Governor PEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION ANi:) EDUCATION Frank G. Thompson, Director \^ ^- \' N A T U R A L HISTORY S U R E I ) I 1 S I O N Hari.o\\ B. Mii.i.s, (-liicf \ olumc 24 BULI^K TIN Article 2 The Leafhoppers, or Cicadellidae, of Illinois (Eurymelinae— Balcluthinae) ]). M. 1)1 f,c)Nc; Priulid hy Jul/iority of the Stall- of Illinois URBANA, ILLINOIS June 194S STATE OF ILLINOIS DwiGHT H. Green, Governor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION Frank G. Thompson, Director BOARD OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION Frank G. Thompson, Chairman A. E. Emerson, Ph.D., Rio/oxv George D. Stoddard, Ph.D., Litt.D., L.H.D., L. H Tiffany, Ph.D., Forestry LL.D., President of the Ihiivcrsily nj Illinois l' R. Howson, B.S.C.E., C.E., Walter H. Newhoi'isk, Ph.D., Geology Engineering Roger Adams, Ph.D., D.Sc, Chemistry NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY DIVISION Urbana, Illinois Scientific and Technical Staff H.^Ri.ow B. Mills, Ph.D., Chief Bessie B. Henderson, M.S., Assistant to the Chief Section of Economic Entomology Section of Forestry Entomologist George C. Decker, Ph.D., WiLLET N. Wandell, M.F., Forester and and Head Head M.S., Entomologist J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Four Hylicinae (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae): Structural Features and Phylogenetic Implications
    insects Article The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Four Hylicinae (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae): Structural Features and Phylogenetic Implications Jiu Tang y , Weijian Huang y and Yalin Zhang * Key Laboratory of Plant Protection Resources and Pest Management, Ministry of Education, Entomological Museum, College of Plant Protection, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China; [email protected] (J.T.); [email protected] (W.H.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-029-87092190 These two authors contributed equally in this study. y Received: 19 November 2020; Accepted: 4 December 2020; Published: 7 December 2020 Simple Summary: Hylicinae, containing 43 described species in 13 genera of two tribes, is one of the most morphologically unique subfamilies of Cicadellidae. Phylogenetic studies on this subfamily were mainly based on morphological characters or several gene fragments and just involved single or two taxa. No mitochondrial genome was reported in Hylicinae before. Therefore, we sequenced and analyzed four complete mtgenomes of Hylicinae (Nacolus tuberculatus, Hylica paradoxa, Balala fujiana, and Kalasha nativa) for the first time to reveal mtgenome characterizations and reconstruct phylogenetic relationships of this group. The comparative analyses showed the mtgenome characterizations of Hylicinae are similar to members of Membracoidea. In phylogenetic results, Hylicinae was recovered as a monophyletic group in Cicadellidae and formed to the sister group of Coelidiinae + Iassinae. These results provide the comprehensive framework and worthy information toward the future researches of this subfamily. Abstract: To reveal mtgenome characterizations and reconstruct phylogenetic relationships of Hylicinae, the complete mtgenomes of four hylicine species, including Nacolus tuberculatus, Hylica paradoxa, Balala fujiana, and Kalasha nativa, were sequenced and comparatively analyzed for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Leafhopper Vectors of Phytopathogenic Viruses (Homoptera, Cicadellidae) Taxonomy, Biology, and Virus Transmission
    /«' THE LEAFHOPPER VECTORS OF PHYTOPATHOGENIC VIRUSES (HOMOPTERA, CICADELLIDAE) TAXONOMY, BIOLOGY, AND VIRUS TRANSMISSION Technical Bulletin No. 1382 Agricultural Research Service UMTED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many individuals gave valuable assistance in the preparation of this work, for which I am deeply grateful. I am especially indebted to Miss Julianne Rolfe for dissecting and preparing numerous specimens for study and for recording data from the literature on the subject matter. Sincere appreciation is expressed to James P. Kramer, U.S. National Museum, Washington, D.C., for providing the bulk of material for study, for allowing access to type speci- mens, and for many helpful suggestions. I am also grateful to William J. Knight, British Museum (Natural History), London, for loan of valuable specimens, for comparing type material, and for giving much useful information regarding the taxonomy of many important species. I am also grateful to the following persons who allowed me to examine and study type specimens: René Beique, Laval Univer- sity, Ste. Foy, Quebec; George W. Byers, University of Kansas, Lawrence; Dwight M. DeLong and Paul H. Freytag, Ohio State University, Columbus; Jean L. LaiFoon, Iowa State University, Ames; and S. L. Tuxen, Universitetets Zoologiske Museum, Co- penhagen, Denmark. To the following individuals who provided additional valuable material for study, I give my sincere thanks: E. W. Anthon, Tree Fruit Experiment Station, Wenatchee, Wash.; L. M. Black, Uni- versity of Illinois, Urbana; W. E. China, British Museum (Natu- ral History), London; L. N. Chiykowski, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa ; G. H. L. Dicker, East Mailing Research Sta- tion, Kent, England; J.
    [Show full text]
  • Ours to Save: the Distribution, Status & Conservation Needs of Canada's Endemic Species
    Ours to Save The distribution, status & conservation needs of Canada’s endemic species June 4, 2020 Version 1.0 Ours to Save: The distribution, status & conservation needs of Canada’s endemic species Additional information and updates to the report can be found at the project website: natureconservancy.ca/ourstosave Suggested citation: Enns, Amie, Dan Kraus and Andrea Hebb. 2020. Ours to save: the distribution, status and conservation needs of Canada’s endemic species. NatureServe Canada and Nature Conservancy of Canada. Report prepared by Amie Enns (NatureServe Canada) and Dan Kraus (Nature Conservancy of Canada). Mapping and analysis by Andrea Hebb (Nature Conservancy of Canada). Cover photo credits (l-r): Wood Bison, canadianosprey, iNaturalist; Yukon Draba, Sean Blaney, iNaturalist; Salt Marsh Copper, Colin Jones, iNaturalist About NatureServe Canada A registered Canadian charity, NatureServe Canada and its network of Canadian Conservation Data Centres (CDCs) work together and with other government and non-government organizations to develop, manage, and distribute authoritative knowledge regarding Canada’s plants, animals, and ecosystems. NatureServe Canada and the Canadian CDCs are members of the international NatureServe Network, spanning over 80 CDCs in the Americas. NatureServe Canada is the Canadian affiliate of NatureServe, based in Arlington, Virginia, which provides scientific and technical support to the international network. About the Nature Conservancy of Canada The Nature Conservancy of Canada (NCC) works to protect our country’s most precious natural places. Proudly Canadian, we empower people to safeguard the lands and waters that sustain life. Since 1962, NCC and its partners have helped to protect 14 million hectares (35 million acres), coast to coast to coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Animal Dispersal, Vicariance and Diversification in the Holarctic
    Biological Journal of the Linnean Society (2001), 73: 345-390. With 15 figures doi:10.1006/bij1.2001.0542, available online at http;//www.idealibrary.comon IDE bl 0 c Patterns of animal dispersal, vicariance and diversification in the Holarctic ISABEL SANMARTIN1*, HENRIK ENGHOFF' and FREDRIK RONQUISTl 'Department of Systematic Zoology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvugen 180, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden 2Zoologisk Museum, Uniuersitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark Received 23 October 2000; accepted for publication 25 March 2001 We analysed patterns of animal dispersal, vicariance and diversification in the Holarctic based on complete phylogenies of 57 extant non-marine taxa, together comprising 770 species, documenting biogeographic events from the Late Mesozoic to the present. Four major areas, each corresponding to a historically persistent landmass, were used in the analyses: eastern Nearctic (EN), western Nearctic (WN), eastern Palaeoarctic (EP) and western Palaeoarctic (WP). Parsimony-based tree fitting showed that there is no significantly supported general area cladogram for the dataset. Yet, distributions are strongly phylogenetically conserved, as revealed by dispersal- vicariance analysis (DIVA). DIVA-based permutation tests were used to pinpoint phylogenetically determined biogeographic patterns. Consistent with expectations, continental dispersals (WP-EP and WN-EN) are sig- nificantly more common than palaeocontinental dispersals (WN-EP and EN-WP), which in turn are more common than disjunct dispersals (EN-EP and WN-WP). There is significant dispersal asymmetry both within the Nearctic (WN+EN more common than EN+WN) and the Palaeoarctic (EP+WP more common than WP-tEP). Cross- Beringian faunal connections have traditionally been emphasized but are not more important than cross-Atlantic connections in our data set.
    [Show full text]
  • Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Eurymelinae)
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 726: 131–143New (2018) eurymeline leafhoppers (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Eurymelinae)... 131 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.726.21976 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research New eurymeline leafhoppers (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Eurymelinae) from Eocene Baltic amber with notes on other fossil Cicadellidae Christopher H. Dietrich1, M. Jared Thomas1 1 Illinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois, 1816 S. Oak St., Champaign, IL 61820, USA Corresponding author: Christopher H. Dietrich ([email protected]) Academic editor: J. Zahniser | Received 31 October 2017 | Accepted 20 December 2017 | Published 10 January 2018 http://zoobank.org/F728EA7C-D4D4-421F-93B4-75C5A1542F59 Citation: Dietrich CH, Thomas MJ (2018) New eurymeline leafhoppers (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Eurymelinae) from Eocene Baltic amber with notes on other fossil Cicadellidae. ZooKeys 726: 131–143. https://doi.org/10.3897/ zookeys.726.21976 Abstract Two new extinct fossil cicadellid taxa from Eocene Baltic amber, representing the subfamily Eurymelinae (sensu lato), are described and illustrated, and their relationships to modern leafhoppers are discussed. Eo- idiocerus emarginatus gen. and sp. n. is the oldest known representative of the tribe Idiocerini. The new genus resembles some modern Afrotropical and Indomalayan idiocerine genera but differs in having the gena relatively narrow. Archipedionis obscurus gen. and sp. n., is the first well-preserved fossil representative of Macropsini to be described in detail. Previous reports of this tribe from Baltic amber, while credible, included too little morphological information to assess their relationships. Additional comparative notes are provided for previously described fossil taxa belonging to Idiocerini and Macropsini from the Oligocene of Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy, Distribution, Biology and Conservation Status Of
    TAXONOMY, DISTRIBUTION, BIOLOGY AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF FINNISH AUCHENORRHYNCHA THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT 7 | 2007 The publication is a revision of the Finnish froghopper and leafhopper fauna Taxonomy, distribution, biology NATURE (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha) using modern systematics and nomenclature and combining a vast amount of recent findings with older ones. The biology and conservation status of of each species is shortly discussed and a link is given to the regularly updated species distribution atlas on the web showing detailed distribution and phenol- Finnish Auchenorrhyncha ogy of each species. An intermittent assessment of the conservation status of all (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha et Cicadomorpha) species is made and the threat factors are shortly discussed. Guy Söderman THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT 7 | 2007 ISBN 978-952-11-2594-2 (PDF) ISSN 1796-1637 (verkkoj.) Finnish Environment Institute THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT 7 | 2007 Taxonomy, distribution, biology and conservation status of Finnish Auchenorrhyncha (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha et Cicadomorpha) Guy Söderman Helsinki 2007 FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT 7 | 2007 Finnish Environment Institute Expert Services Department Page layout: Pirjo Lehtovaara Front cover: Freshly hatched Mountain Cicada (Cicadetta montana, photo: Jaakko Lahti) The publication is only available in the internet: www.environment.fi/publications ISBN 978-952-11-2594-2 (PDF) ISSN 1796-1637 (verkkoj.) PREFACE The latest assessment of the Finnish species in year 2000 revealed a strong defiency in the knowledge of planthoppers and leafhoppers. About one third of all species could not be properly assessed and were classified as data deficient. A year later a national Expert Group on Hemiptera was formed to increase the basic knowledge of this insect order.
    [Show full text]
  • The Major Arthropod Pests and Weeds of Agriculture in Southeast Asia
    The Major Arthropod Pests and Weeds of Agriculture in Southeast Asia: Distribution, Importance and Origin D.F. Waterhouse (ACIAR Consultant in Plant Protection) ACIAR (Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research) Canberra AUSTRALIA The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) was established in June 1982 by an Act of the Australian Parliament. Its mandate is to help identify agricultural problems in developing countries and to commission collaborative research between Australian and developing country researchers in fields where Australia has a special research competence. Where trade names are used this constitutes neither endorsement of nor discrimination against any product by the Centre. ACIAR MO'lOGRAPH SERIES This peer-reviewed series contains the results of original research supported by ACIAR, or deemed relevant to ACIAR's research objectives. The series is distributed internationally, with an emphasis on the Third World. © Australian Centre for 1I1lernational Agricultural Resl GPO Box 1571, Canberra, ACT, 2601 Waterhouse, D.F. 1993. The Major Arthropod Pests an Importance and Origin. Monograph No. 21, vi + 141pI- ISBN 1 86320077 0 Typeset by: Ms A. Ankers Publication Services Unit CSIRO Division of Entomology Canberra ACT Printed by Brown Prior Anderson, 5 Evans Street, Burwood, Victoria 3125 ii Contents Foreword v 1. Abstract 2. Introduction 3 3. Contributors 5 4. Results 9 Tables 1. Major arthropod pests in Southeast Asia 10 2. The distribution and importance of major arthropod pests in Southeast Asia 27 3. The distribution and importance of the most important arthropod pests in Southeast Asia 40 4. Aggregated ratings for the most important arthropod pests 45 5. Origin of the arthropod pests scoring 5 + (or more) or, at least +++ in one country or ++ in two countries 49 6.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the RESTRUCTURING of ARTHROPOD TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS in RESPONSE to PLANT INVASION by Adam B. Mitchell a Dissertation Submitt
    THE RESTRUCTURING OF ARTHROPOD TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS IN RESPONSE TO PLANT INVASION by Adam B. Mitchell 1 A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Entomology and Wildlife Ecology Winter 2019 © Adam B. Mitchell All Rights Reserved THE RESTRUCTURING OF ARTHROPOD TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS IN RESPONSE TO PLANT INVASION by Adam B. Mitchell Approved: ______________________________________________________ Jacob L. Bowman, Ph.D. Chair of the Department of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology Approved: ______________________________________________________ Mark W. Rieger, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Agriculture and Natural Resources Approved: ______________________________________________________ Douglas J. Doren, Ph.D. Interim Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: ______________________________________________________ Douglas W. Tallamy, Ph.D. Professor in charge of dissertation I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: ______________________________________________________ Charles R. Bartlett, Ph.D. Member of dissertation committee I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: ______________________________________________________ Jeffery J. Buler, Ph.D. Member of dissertation committee I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • THESIS a SURVEY of the ARTHROPOD FAUNA ASSOCIATED with HEMP (CANNABIS SATIVA L.) GROWN in EASTERN COLORADO Submitted by Melissa
    THESIS A SURVEY OF THE ARTHROPOD FAUNA ASSOCIATED WITH HEMP (CANNABIS SATIVA L.) GROWN IN EASTERN COLORADO Submitted by Melissa Schreiner Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Fall 2019 Master’s Committee: Advisor: Whitney Cranshaw Frank Peairs Mark Uchanski Copyright by Melissa Schreiner 2019 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT A SURVEY OF THE ARTHROPOD FAUNA ASSOCIATED WITH HEMP (CANNABIS SATIVA L.) GROWN IN EASTERN COLORADO Industrial hemp was found to support a diverse complex of arthropods in the surveys of hemp fields in eastern Colorado. Seventy-three families of arthropods were collected from hemp grown in eight counties in Colorado in 2016, 2017, and 2018. Other important groups found in collections were of the order Diptera, Coleoptera, and Hemiptera. The arthropods present in fields had a range of association with the crop and included herbivores, natural enemies, pollen feeders, and incidental species. Hemp cultivars grown for seed and fiber had higher insect species richness compared to hemp grown for cannabidiol (CBD). This observational field survey of hemp serves as the first checklist of arthropods associated with the crop in eastern Colorado. Emerging key pests of the crop that are described include: corn earworm (Helicoverpa zea (Boddie)), hemp russet mite (Aculops cannibicola (Farkas)), cannabis aphid (Phorodon cannabis (Passerini)), and Eurasian hemp borer (Grapholita delineana (Walker)). Local outbreaks of several species of grasshoppers were observed and produced significant crop injury, particularly twostriped grasshopper (Melanoplus bivittatus (Say)). Approximately half (46%) of the arthropods collected in sweep net samples during the three year sampling period were categorized as predators, natural enemies of arthropods.
    [Show full text]