DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliografía Para Curso Political Science 211, Dr. H.M. Stout, [1966?]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliografía Para Curso Political Science 211, Dr. H.M. Stout, [1966?] POLITICAL SCIENCE 211 DR. H. M. STOUT READINGS IN COMPARATIVE GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS I. General Almond, Gabriel A. and G. Bingham Powell, Jr. Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach. Boston, 1966. Almond, Gabriel A. and Jam es S. Coleman. Politics of the Developing Areas. Princeton, 1960. Almond, Gabriel A. and Sydney Verba. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Boston, 1963. Apter, David E. The Politics of Modernization. Chicago, 1964. Brogan, D. W. and Douglas V. Verney. Political Patterns in Today's World. New York, 1964. Catlin, George E. G. Systematic Politics. Toronto, 1962. Easton, David. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York, 1964. Eckstein, Harry and David Apter, eds. Comparative Politics: A Reader. Glencoe, Ill., 1963. Finer, Herman,. The Theory and Practice of Modern Government. 4th ed. London, 1961. Friedrich, Carl J. Constitutional Government and Democracy: Theory and Practice in Europe and America. Rev. ed. Boston, 1950. • Hecksher, Gunnar. The Study of Comparative Politics and Government. London, 19 5 7. '. i Kantsky, John. Political Change in Underdeveloped Countries. New York, • 1962. Kornhauser, William. The Politics of Mass Society. New York, 1959. Lasswell, Harold D. and Abraham Kaplan. Power and Society: A Frame­ work for Political Inquiry. New Haven, 1950. - 2 - L (con't) Lipset, Seymour. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Garden City, N. Y. , 1960. Lipson, Leslie. The Democratic Civilization. New York, 1964. Macridis, Roy C. and Bernard E. Brown. Comparative Politics: Notes and Readings. Rev. ed. Homewood, Ill., 1964. Merritt, Richard L. and Stein Rokkan. Comparing Nation~: _ The Use of Quantitative Data in Cross-National Research. New Haven, 1965. Moore, Barrington, Jr. Political Power and Social Theory. Cambridge~ Mass., 1958. Moore, Barrington, Jr. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Boston, 1966. Neumann, Franz L. The Democratic and Authoritarian State. Glencoe, Ill., 1957. Organski, A.. F. K. The Stages of Political Development. New York, 1965. Pye, Lucian W. and Sidney Verba, eds. Political Culture and Political Development. Princeton, N. J., 1965. Runciman, W. G. Social Science and Political Theory. Cambridge, 1963. Ulam, Adam B. The Unfinished Revolution. New York, 1960. Verney, Douglas V. The Analysis of Political Systems. London, 1959. Young, Roland, ed. Approaches to the Study of Politics. Evanston, Ill., 1958 I .. < < - 3 - II. Political Systems Adrian, Charles R. and Charles Press. The American Political Process. New York, 1965. Amery, L. S. Thoughts on the Constitution. London, 1953. Andrews, W. G., ed. Constitution and Constitutionalism. Princeton, N. J., 1961. Arendt, Hannah. The Origins of Totalitarianism. 2nd ed. New York, 1958. Beer, S. H., et al. Patterns of Government: the Major ~9.!it~c~l Sys.terns_ of Europe. 2nd ed. New York, 1962. Binder, Leonard. Iran: Political Development in a Changing Society. Berkeley, Calif. , 1962. Birch, Anthony H. Representative and Responsible Government: an Essay on the British Constitution. London, 1964. Bowie, Robert R. and C. J. Friedrich, eds. Studies in Federalism. Boston, 19 54. Brady, Alexander. Democracy in the Dominions. 3rd ed. Toronto, 1958. Carter, Gwendolen M. and John H. Herz. Major Foreign Powers. 4th ed. New York, 1964. Corry, J. A. and J. E. Hodgetts. Democratic Government and Politics. 3rd ed. New York, 1960. Dawson, R. M. The Government of Canada. 4th ed. Toronto, 1963. Duverger, Maurice. The French Political System. Chicago, 1958. Erler, Fritz. Democracy in Germany. Cambridge, Mass., 1965. Fainsod, Merle. How Russia Is Ruled. Rev. ed. Cambridge, Mass., 1963. Ferguson, John H. and Dean E. McHenry. The American System of Government. 8th ed. New York, 1965. Friedrich, C. J. Constitutional Government and Democracy. New York, 1950. I < II. (con't) - 4 - Friedrich, C. J. and z. K. Brezezinski. Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy. 2nd ed. New York, 1965. Grosser, Alfred. The Federal Republic of Germany. New York, 1964. Hazard, John. The Soviet System of Government. Rev. ed. Chicago, 1963. Heidenheimer, Arnold J. The Governments of Germany. 2nd ed. New York, 1966. Jennings, Sir Ivor. The British Constitution. 4th ed. Cambridge, 1961. Kahin, George McT. , ed. Governments and Politics of Southeast Asia. --·- - -- -·------- ·- ·- Ithaca, N. Y., 1959. Kraines, Oscar. Government and Politics in Israel. Boston, 1961. Kulski, W. W. The Soviet Regime, Communism in Practice. 4th ed. Syracuse, N. Y. , 1964. Livingstone, William S. Federalism and Constitutional Change. New York, 1956. McWhinney, Edward. Comparative Federalism: States' Rights and National Power. Toronto, 1962. Macmahan, Arthur W. Federalism Mature and Emergent. New York, 1955. Meyer, Alfred G. The Soviet Political System: An Interpretation. New York, 1965. Redford, Emmette S., David B. Truman, Andrew Hacker, Alan F. West in and Robert C. Wood, Politics and Government in the United States. New York, 1965. Rose, Richard. Politics in England. Boston, 1964. Skilling, H. Gordon. The Governments of East Europe. New York, 1966. Spiro, Herbert J. Government by Constitution: The Political Systems of Democracy. New York, 1965. Stewart, Michael. Modern Forms of Government: a Comparative Study. New York, 1961. II. (con 't) ... 5 - Strong, C. F. Modern Political Constitutions: an Introduction to the Comparative Study of their History and Existing Form. London, 1963. Thomson, David. Democracy in France: The Third and Fourth Republics. 4th Ed. London, 1964. Tsuneishi, Warren i\/I~ Japanese Political Style: An Introduction to the Government and .Politics of Modern Japan. New York, 1966. Ulam, Adam. B. The New Face of Soviet Totalitarianism. Cambridge, Mass. , 1963. Wahl, Nicholas. The Fifth Republic: France's New Political System. 2nd ed. New York, 1962. Ward, Robert E. and Roy C. Macridis, eds. Modern Political Systems­ Asia. Englewood Cliffs. N. J. , 1963. Wheare, K. C. Modern Constitutions. New York, 1951. Wheare, K. C. Federal Government. 4th ed. New York, 1964. Wolfe, Bertram D. Communist Totalitarian~sm, Keys to the Soviet System. Boston, 1961. - 6 - III. Political Leadership and Political Elites Avril, Pierre. Le Regime Politique de la Ve Republique. Paris, 1964. Brown, Stuart Gerry. The American Presidency: Leadership, Partisanship and Popularity. New York, 1966. Bullock, Alan. Hitler: a Study in Tyranny. London, 1952. Ch' en, Jerome. Mao and the Chinese Revolution. New York, 1965. Cornwell, Elmer E. Jr. Presidential Leadership of Public Opinion. Bloomington, Ind., 1965. Duverger, Maurice. La Ve Republique et le Regime Presidentiel. Paris, 1961. Edinger, Lewis J. Kurt Schumacher: A Study in Personality and Political Behavior. Stanford, Calif., 1965. Full Circle: the Memoirs of Anthony Eden. Boston, 1960. Guttsman, W. L. The British Political Elite. New York, 1964. Hanna, Willard A. Eight Nation .Makers: Southeast Aisa's Charismatic Statesmen. New York, 1964. Hunter, Floyd. Top Leadership U.S. A. Chapel Hill, N. C. 1959. Kinross, Lord. Ataturk: A Biography of Mustafa -Kemal, Father of Modern Turkey. New York, 1965. Lasswell, Harold D., Daniel Lerner and C. Easton Rothwell. The Comparative Study of Elites: an Introduction and Bibliography. Stanford, Calif. 1952. Linden, Carl A. Khrushchev and the Soviet Leadership, 1957-1964. Baltimore, 1966. Lukomski, Jess M. Erhard of Germany. New York, 1965. Moraes, Frank. Jawaharlal Nehru: a Biography. New York, 1956. Neustadt, Richard. Presidential Power: the Politics of Leadership. New York, 1960. Park, Richard L. and Irene Tinker, eds. Leadership and Political Institutions in India. Princeton, 19 59. ·. III. (con 't) - 7 - Pistrak, Lazar. The Grand Tactician: Khrushchev's Rise to Power. New York, 19 61. The Reckoning: The Memoirs of Anthony Eden, Earl of Avon. Boston, 1965. Rush, Myron. Political Succession in the USSR• New York, 1965. Stern, Carola. Ulbricht: a Political Biography. New York, 1965. Swearer, Howard R. The Politics of Succession in the USSR. Boston, 1964. Warren, Sidney. The President as World Leader. Philadelphia, 1964. Williams, Francis A. A Prime Minister Remembers: The War and Postwar Memoirs of the Rt. Hon. Earl Attlee. London, 1961. Yoshida, Shigeru. The Yoshida Memoirs. Boston, 1962. - 8 - IV. Politics, Parties, and Electoral Systems A. Politics and Electoral Systems Bealey, Frank, J. Blondel, and W. P. Mccann. Constituency Politics: A Study of Newcastle-under-Lyme. ~ondon, 1965. Beer, S. H. British Politics in the Collectivist Age. New York, 1965. Brogan, Denis W. Citizenship Today: England, France.. and the United States. Chapel Hill, 1960. Brzezinski, Z. K. Ideology and Power in Soviet Politics. New York., 1962. Butler, David E., ed. Elections Abroad, New York, 1959. Butler, David E. The Electoral System in Britain since 1918.. London, 1963. Carson, George Barr. Electoral Practices in the U.S. S. R. New York, 1955. Campbell, Peter. French Electoral Systems and Elections 1789 - 1957. London, 19 58. Charnay, Jean-Paul. Le Suffrage Politique en France. Paris., 1965. Dahl, Robert A. Political Oppositions in Western Democracies. New Haven, 1966. Duverger, Maurice. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York, 1954. Epstein, Leon D. British Politics in the Suez Crisis. Urbana, Ill. , 1964. Fogarty, Michael P. Christian Democracy in Western Europe. Notre Dame, Ind., 19 57. Goguel, Francois. La Politique des partis sons la Ille Republique. Paris, 1946. Jupp, James. Australian Party Politics. New York, 1964. Kitzinger, U.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Class Struggles in France 1848-1850
    Karl Marx The Class Struggles in France, 1848-1850 Written: December January-October 1850; Published: as a booklet by Engels in 1895; Source: Selected Works, Volume 1, Progress Publishers, Moscow 1969; Proofed: and corrected by Matthew Carmody, 2009, Mark Harris 2010; Transcribed: by Louis Proyect. Table of Contents Introduction (Engels, 1895) ......................................................................................................... 1 Part I: The Defeat of June 1848 ................................................................................................. 15 Part II: From June 1848 to June 13, 1849 .................................................................................. 31 Part III: Consequences of June 13, 1849 ................................................................................... 50 Part IV: The Abolition of Universal Suffrage in 1850 .............................................................. 70 Introduction (Engels, 1895)1 The work republished here was Marx’s first attempt to explain a piece of contemporary history by means of his materialist conception, on the basis of the prevailing economic situation. In the Communist Manifesto, the theory was applied in broad outline to the whole of modern history; in the articles by Marx and myself in the Neue Rheinische Zeitung, it was constantly used to interpret political events of the day. Here, on the other hand, the question was to demonstrate the inner causal connection in the course of a development which extended over some years, a development
    [Show full text]
  • The French Left Long-Run Trends CLAUDE BOURDET
    Universities & Left Review Spring 1957 Vol.1 No 1 The French Left Long-run trends CLAUDE BOURDET From the social, internationalist period following the Liberation. 1947 following its opposition to the and anti-colonial ideals of the Re- Moreover, frightened as always by war in Indo China. Its disbandment sistance, seemingly all-powerful in the greater militancy and vigour increased the Party's tendency to August, 1944, to the repeated post- of the French Communists, the have an ageing membership. war relapses into right-wing reaction S.F.I.O. leaders moved ever closer Further, with many disillusioned or immobilisme—such has been the to the third party of the post-war radicals leaving the Party, the lead- dismal course of French politics. administrations, the M.R.P. This ership relied increasingly on people This has not been due to the polit- led to increasing involvement with who joined the Party for reasons of ical capacity of the French ruling the M.R.P.'s colonial interests and, personal ambition and status con- class—for seldom has a ruling class ultimately, to socialist support for siderations—for example the higher been so blind not only to the the Indo-Chinese War and refusal ranges of municipal employees, national interests but even to its of the repeated Viet Minh offers of teachers, civil servants. It was upon own, as that which squandered peace negotiation. Afraid of "going these people—to whom socialism French men and resources in Viet it alone" with the Communists, they meant little more than political sup- Nam.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenger Party List
    Appendix List of Challenger Parties Operationalization of Challenger Parties A party is considered a challenger party if in any given year it has not been a member of a central government after 1930. A party is considered a dominant party if in any given year it has been part of a central government after 1930. Only parties with ministers in cabinet are considered to be members of a central government. A party ceases to be a challenger party once it enters central government (in the election immediately preceding entry into office, it is classified as a challenger party). Participation in a national war/crisis cabinets and national unity governments (e.g., Communists in France’s provisional government) does not in itself qualify a party as a dominant party. A dominant party will continue to be considered a dominant party after merging with a challenger party, but a party will be considered a challenger party if it splits from a dominant party. Using this definition, the following parties were challenger parties in Western Europe in the period under investigation (1950–2017). The parties that became dominant parties during the period are indicated with an asterisk. Last election in dataset Country Party Party name (as abbreviation challenger party) Austria ALÖ Alternative List Austria 1983 DU The Independents—Lugner’s List 1999 FPÖ Freedom Party of Austria 1983 * Fritz The Citizens’ Forum Austria 2008 Grüne The Greens—The Green Alternative 2017 LiF Liberal Forum 2008 Martin Hans-Peter Martin’s List 2006 Nein No—Citizens’ Initiative against
    [Show full text]
  • A Powerful Political Platform: Françoise Giroud and L'express in a Cold War Climate Imogen Long Abstract Founded in 1953 by J
    1 This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in French History following peer review. The version of record, Imogen Long; A powerful political platform: Françoise Giroud and L’Express in a Cold War climate, French History, Volume 30, Issue 2, 1 June 2016, Pages 241–258, is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/fh/crw001. A powerful political platform: françoise giroud and l’express in a cold war climate Imogen Long Abstract Founded in 1953 by Jean-Jacques Servan-Schreiber and Françoise Giroud, L’Express was a politically committed outlet predominantly led by Giroud’s strong editorial direction until its rebranding in 1964 along the lines of Time magazine. Its goals were clear: to encourage modernization in French cultural and economic life, to support Pierre Mendès France and to oppose the war in Indochina. This article investigates Giroud’s vision of the press, her politics and her journalistic dialogue with other significant actors at a complex and pivotal juncture in French Cold War history. Giroud opened up the columns of L’Express to a diverse range of leading writers and intellectuals, even to those in disagreement with the publication, as the case study of Jean-Paul Sartre highlighted here shows. In so doing, Giroud’s L’Express constituted a singularly powerful press platform in Cold War France. I 2 For Kristin Ross, the “ideal couple”’ of Giroud and Servan-Schreiber at the helm of L’Express echoed the pairing of Sartre and Beauvoir; 1 yet Giroud and Servan-Schreiber were a duo with a different outlook, focused on economic development and the modernization of French society along American lines.
    [Show full text]
  • La Prensa and Liberalism in Argentina, 1930-19461 Jorge Nállim University of Manitoba
    An Unbroken Loyalty in Turbulent Times: La Prensa and Liberalism in Argentina, 1930-19461 JORGE NÁLLIM University of Manitoba In recent years, a growing body of scholarship has revised one of the most controversial periods in Argentine history: the sixteen years between the mi- litary coup of September 1930 and the presidential election of Juan Perón in 1946. These years have been traditionally interpreted as a transition period, a “prelude” to the emergence of Peronism, characterized by the decadence of the nineteenth-century liberal republic in a context of political and ideological crisis and economic and social transformation. While acknowledging some of those features, new studies emphasize the blurred political and ideological boundaries of the main political and social actors and locate them within the broader histo- rical framework of the interwar years. For example, they show that the Radical and Socialist parties and the conservative groups that gathered in the ruling Concordancia coalition were deeply divided and far from being ideologically homogeneous, and that varied positions on state economic intervention, free trade, and industrialization generated both sharp intra-party differences as well as cross-party coincidences.2 This new historiography offers a particularly fruitful context to explore one of the most important national newspapers in this period, La Prensa. Founded in 1869 by José C. Paz in the city of Buenos Aires, La Prensa eventually achieved a large national circulation and a reputation as a “serious press,” which made it widely accepted as a reliable source of information and a frequent reference in congressional debates. Firmly controlled by the Paz family, the newspaper and its owners prospered during Argentina’s elitist liberal republic which lasted [email protected] E.I.A.L., Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • The French Presidential Election: an Assessment by Thierry Leterre, Professor of Political Science, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Versailles, St
    The French Presidential Election: An Assessment By Thierry Leterre, Professor of Political Science, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Versailles, St. Quentin In the Constitution of the Fifth Republic (founded by General Charles de Gaulle in 1958), the presidency is the key-stone of French institutions. Presidential elections are dramatic moments in the country’s democratic life: the people of the Republic choses by direct universal suffrage the incarnation of its sovereignty for five years. (The term was seven years until the 2001 constitutional revision: see US-France Analysis by Olivier Duhamel, “France's New Five-Year Presiential Term, http://www.brookings.edu/fp/cusf/analysis/quinquennat.htm). The President of the Republic is elected by an absolute majority of votes cast. If no candidate obtains a majority on the first ballot, a second ballot is organized with the two candidates who have won the greatest number of votes in the first ballot. This two-round system avoids an election with only a relative majority and prevents third party candidates-such as Ross Perot or Ralph Nader in recent American elections-from distorting the outcome. The French believe this would weaken the bond between the nation and its supreme representative. Any French citizen who meets certain eligibility criteria can run for president. These criteria include paying a deposit of €153,000 and getting “500 signatures”-the patronage of at least 500 elected officials (from a list of about 45,000) from 30 départements. There are some 15 official candidates in the 2002 election (see table). The final contest, however, will be a showdown between two, and only two, competitors.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook: Government Composition, 1960-2019
    Codebook: Government Composition, 1960-2019 Codebook: SUPPLEMENT TO THE COMPARATIVE POLITICAL DATA SET – GOVERNMENT COMPOSITION 1960-2019 Klaus Armingeon, Sarah Engler and Lucas Leemann The Supplement to the Comparative Political Data Set provides detailed information on party composition, reshuffles, duration, reason for termination and on the type of government for 36 democratic OECD and/or EU-member countries. The data begins in 1959 for the 23 countries formerly included in the CPDS I, respectively, in 1966 for Malta, in 1976 for Cyprus, in 1990 for Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania and Slovakia, in 1991 for Poland, in 1992 for Estonia and Lithuania, in 1993 for Latvia and Slovenia and in 2000 for Croatia. In order to obtain information on both the change of ideological composition and the following gap between the new an old cabinet, the supplement contains alternative data for the year 1959. The government variables in the main Comparative Political Data Set are based upon the data presented in this supplement. When using data from this data set, please quote both the data set and, where appropriate, the original source. Please quote this data set as: Klaus Armingeon, Sarah Engler and Lucas Leemann. 2021. Supplement to the Comparative Political Data Set – Government Composition 1960-2019. Zurich: Institute of Political Science, University of Zurich. These (former) assistants have made major contributions to the dataset, without which CPDS would not exist. In chronological and descending order: Angela Odermatt, Virginia Wenger, Fiona Wiedemeier, Christian Isler, Laura Knöpfel, Sarah Engler, David Weisstanner, Panajotis Potolidis, Marlène Gerber, Philipp Leimgruber, Michelle Beyeler, and Sarah Menegal.
    [Show full text]
  • Before New Liberalism: the Continuity of Radical Dissent, 1867-1914
    Before New Liberalism: The Continuity of Radical Dissent, 1867-1914 A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2019 Nicholas A. Loizou School of Arts, Languages and Cultures Table of Contents: List of Figures 4 Abstract 6 Introduction 10 Research Objectives: A Revision in Politico-Religious History 10 A Historiographical Review 13 Methodology and Approach 23 1. Radical Dissent, Social Gospels and the Community, 1860-1906 28 1. Introduction 28 2. Growing Communitarianism and Religious Theology 29 3. The Importance of Radical Dissent and the Community 37 4. Nonconformity and the Urban Working Class 41 5. Nonconformity and the Liberal Party 51 6. Conclusion 56 2. Nonconformity, Liberalism and Labour 58 1. Introduction 58 2. The Significance of Nonconformity in Co-operative Class Relations 62 3. The Reform League 69 4. Nonconformity, Class and Christian Brotherhood in the Age of Gladstone 77 5. ‘That Church and King Mob’: Nonconformity, Brotherhood and Anti-Tory Rhetoric 82 6. Liberal-Labour Politics and the Late Nineteenth Century Social Turn in Nonconformity 87 7. Conclusion 93 3. Birmingham and the Civic Gospel: 1860-1886 94 1. Introduction 94 2. The Civic Gospel: The Origins of a Civic Theology 98 3. The Civic Gospel and the Cohesion of the Birmingham Corporation: 1860 – 1886 102 4. The Civic Gospel and Municipal Socialism: 1867-1886 111 5. The National Liberal Federation 116 6. The Radical Programme 122 7. Conclusion: The Legacy of Birmingham Progressivism 128 4. From Provincial Liberalism to National Politics: Nonconformist Movements 1860-1906 130 2 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Tbe New Monnet Pi.An
    DEC. 19551 NO. II TBE NEW MONNET PI.AN Near unanimity characterized initial western reaction last cussion of European issues since the French Assembly's month to the founding by Jean Monnet of a new "Action rejection of a European army, on August 31, 1954) was Committee for a United Europe". Except for opposition also emphasized by the immediate and unanimous decision by extremist groups at both ends of the political spectrum, of the French Socialist Executive to pledge the party's sup­ the press representing majority parties in the parliaments port for the Committee. The Executive, like the party, of continental European states widely hailed the new move had split over the European Defense Community. as the first substantial step toward a re-alignment of pro­ The aim of the Committee, defined in a letter sent European forces since the defeat of the European Defense by M. Monnet to each of the 33 founder-members, is "to Community. achieve a United States of Europe by concrete accomplish­ On October 14, 1955, the 67-year-old "architect of Eu­ ments". The Committee's action will consist "by its own rope" announced the formation of an independent organ­ intervention and that of the organizations grouped within ization designed to break through existing political and it, of making clear to governments, parliaments and public national barriers in the path of federation. Devised and opinion their determination to see the Messina resolution formed by M. Monnet, the new Action Committee groups of June 2 constitute a real step towards a United States together 3 3 leading political and trade union leaders from of Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FRENCH COMMUNIST PARTY WAS ITS POLICY PROS 1939 O
    THE FRENCH COMMUNIST PARTY WAS ITS POLICY PROS 1939 o 1941 JUSTIFIED? by KATHLEEN FORSYTHE WYSONG A THESIS Presented to the Deportment oS History and the Rotors Council of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillmentt of the requirements for the degree of Bacheler of Arts With Honors Soy 1949 1 I ;1;t ON 1, ON ger 011 $ ---4**-7------rres omit, APPROVED TAM OP CONTENTS Obsptor Pegs INTRODUCTION0• ***** • *** •• ii***********1 IX * THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PARTY FROM 1920 TO 1939************** 3 III * THE COMMUNISTS" "DELICATE PERIOD**. AUGUST 1939 TO JUNE 1941 * a * * * * • *26 IV. PROS AND CONS OF THE *DELICATE PERIOD*••4****************66 CONCLUSION ••••••••••••. • * • ••• 62 BIBLIOGRAPHY* *******.• 0*** • •••••••64 CHAPTER2 INTRODUCTION A careful study of the Freneh Communist Partys history provides ample evidence to prove that this group closely follows the Soviet line .. whether by direct orders from Mow, or by attentive observation of the Soviets movers is immaterial ' There is no other logical explanation of the Partys zigzags in 1933,E 1939, end, 1941* However, the more fundamental problem to be resolved concerns the justi- fication for so-tortuous a policy. The French Communists today era extremely proud of their record, and they claim to be the only party that has consistently pursued a pro- gram designed for the good of Freeness There are many Frenchmen, though, who not only fail to agree with such statement but who also accuse the Communists of having be. trayed France in a moment of crisis Since the French Communist Party is not an expended force but is an even greater factor in present-day France than before the ware an examination of this Partys develop.
    [Show full text]
  • The French Party System Forms a Benchmark Study of the State of Party Politics in France
    evans cover 5/2/03 2:37 PM Page 1 THE FRENCH PARTY SYSTEM THE FRENCHPARTY This book provides a complete overview of political parties in France. The social and ideological profiles of all the major parties are analysed chapter by chapter, highlighting their principal functions and dynamics within the system. This examination is THE complemented by analyses of bloc and system features, including the pluralist left, Europe, and the ideological space in which the parties operate. In particular, the book addresses the impressive FRENCH capacity of French parties and their leaders to adapt themselves to the changing concerns of their electorates and to a shifting PARTY institutional context. Contrary to the apparently fragmentary system and increasingly hostile clashes between political personalities, the continuities in the French political system seem SYSTEM destined to persist. Drawing on the expertise of its French and British contributors, The French party system forms a benchmark study of the state of party politics in France. It will be an essential text for all students of Edited by French politics and parties, and of interest to students of European Evans Jocelyn Evans politics more generally. ed. Jocelyn Evans is Lecturer in Politics at the University of Salford The French party system The French party system edited by Jocelyn A. J. Evans Manchester University Press Manchester and New York distributed exclusively in the USA by Palgrave Copyright © Manchester University Press 2003 While copyright in the volume as a whole is vested in Manchester University Press, copyright in individual chapters belongs to their respective authors. This electronic version has been made freely available under a Creative Commons (CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, which permits non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction provided the author(s) and Manchester University Press are fully cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan (£) Copyright By
    This dissertation has bean microfilmedexactly as r e c e iv e d 68—8882 SMITH, Thomas Alexander, 1936- y L'UNION POUR LA NOUVELLE REPUBLIQUE: GAULLISM IN THE FIFTH REPUBLIC. The Ohio State University, Ph.D.t 1967 Political Science, general University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan (£) Copyright by Thomas Alexander Smith 1966 L'UNION POUR LA NOUVELLE REPUBLIQUE: GAULLISM IN THE FIFTH REPUBLIC DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Thomas Alexander Smith, B.A., A.M. ****** The Ohio State University 1967 Approved by U Adviser Department of Political Science ACKNOWLEDGMENT S At this time I would like to acknowledge a debt to several individuals who have contributed so much to this work. First, to the late Professor Edgar S. Furniss whose deep Insight into the workings of the French polity aided me Immeasurably in my attempts to understand the nature of the UNB. and its role in the Fifth Republic. His encouragement and friendship will never be forgotten. Secondly, to Professor James A. Robinson who agreed to supervise the completion of the dissertation after Professor Furniss*s tragic death, and to Professor Andrew Axllne who painstakingly read the dissertation and whose comments were so helpful 1 am extremely grateful. Thirdly, to my wife, Camille, who never lost faith in the project and who laboriously typed the initial draft of this dissertation, I can never repay in full the debt. It is to her and the memory of Professor Furniss that I humbly dedicate this study.
    [Show full text]