DOCSLIB.ORG

Legislative Assembly

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

25856 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Wednesday 22 September 2010 __________ The Speaker (The Hon. George Richard Torbay) took the chair at 10.00 a.m. The Speaker read the Prayer and acknowledgement of country. BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE Notices of Motions General Business Notices of Motions (General Notices) given. CONSTITUTION AMENDMENT (RECOGNITION OF ABORIGINAL PEOPLE) BILL 2010 Agreement in Principle Debate resumed from 21 September 2010. Ms JODI McKAY (Newcastle—Minister for Tourism, Minister for the Hunter, Minister for Science and Medical Research, and Minister for Women) [10.07 a.m.]: I am pleased to support this bill, which will provide a formal constitutional recognition of Aboriginal people as the first people of New South Wales. This amendment to the Constitution Act will provide acknowledgement of the spiritual, social and cultural connection Aboriginal people have with their land and waters, and the significant contributions Aboriginal people have made to our community. Reconciliation between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people in Australia is a work in progress and this proposal builds on the New South Wales Government's commitment to Aboriginal people. Regrettably, the actions, words and behaviour of a few in our society have not always helped the community's efforts to work towards reconciliation. My colleague the Minister for the State Plan, and Minister for Community Services, and the first Aboriginal person elected to State Parliament has spoken of the significance of this move to acknowledge Aboriginal people and the value of their contribution. She said: This formal recognition is very important to the Aboriginal community. It's a sign of respect and it has come at a time when the issue of racism has reared its ugly head again. This constitutional recognition will go some way to healing wounds. Each of us must work towards healing those wounds. Constitutional recognition as the first people of New South Wales marks another important step towards righting the wrongs of the past and embracing a positive future for Aboriginal people in New South Wales. The national apology to the stolen generations, delivered on behalf of the nation by former Prime Minister Rudd, was such a significant occasion in Australia's history and provided renewed momentum to the efforts of reconciliation across the country, which had stalled under the leadership of former Prime Minister Howard. The recognition of Aboriginal peoples in the New South Wales Constitution builds on the direction taken by the national apology to further reconciliation and harmony between communities, showing respect to indigenous peoples and working to reduce the gap that exists between indigenous and non-indigenous people across New South Wales. In announcing the proposed new section for the New South Wales Constitution, the Premier said: Constitutional recognition reminds us that the determination to close the gap in a range of indicators continues. Aboriginal people make up an important and sizeable section of the Hunter region's population, and it is growing. I am advised that the Aboriginal population of the Hunter region is forecast to increase by 36 per cent over the next 12 years, from 18,377 last year to 25,062 in 2021, making the Hunter the third-fastest growing population of Aboriginal people in New South Wales. We have a responsibility to Aboriginal communities to target resources to help eliminate inequalities between indigenous and non-indigenous populations across a range of areas, particularly in health, housing, education and job creation. I know that people across Newcastle and the Hunter region will welcome the formal recognition of Aboriginal people as the first people of New South Wales as another milestone in achieving better outcomes for 22 September 2010 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY 25857 Aboriginal people. Many people in Newcastle and the Hunter have been campaigning for greater recognition of the contribution of Aboriginal people, which will help correct the imbalance that exists between indigenous and non-indigenous people. Respected Awabakal Elder Aunty Sandra Griffin has also welcomed the recognition of Aboriginal people in the New South Wales Constitution as a truly significant milestone for Aboriginal people. In a fax sent to me, Aunty Sandra wrote: It is indeed an historic day for us the Aboriginal people to be formally acknowledged as the State's first people. It is a giant landmark step … I feel I will never walk again but float on Mother Earth … Such words of passion show the heartfelt meaning this gesture of constitutional recognition has for indigenous peoples in New South Wales. Aunty Sandra is a highly respected Awabakal woman, who has stood up for her community and is widely loved throughout Newcastle and the Hunter. Her endorsement of the Government's proposal for constitutional recognition gives me all the reasons in the world I need to support this measure. Today is also a day for which non-indigenous citizens can be proud, knowing how important the decision of this Parliament will be for our Aboriginal citizens. Recognition of Aboriginal people in the New South Wales Constitution will further demonstrate our respect for Aboriginal people as the traditional owners of the lands and waters of New South Wales, and show that our State values their contribution to the community. I note that the Federal Parliament may also consider a bill for a referendum to include similar recognition of Aboriginal people in the Commonwealth Constitution as part of the arrangements between the Gillard Government and the Independents in the House of Representatives. This would be another important milestone towards reconciliation. I will close with a statement made by an Aboriginal man who spoke with my office on the significance of the constitutional recognition of Aboriginal people as the first people of New South Wales and other important measures, including the 1967 referendum granting citizenship to Aboriginal people and the national apology. He said: These are big steps, slow steps, but appreciated steps … I commend the bill to the House and look forward to its unanimous support in this place as a very strong indication to Aboriginal people around New South Wales that we are as one on the need to acknowledge and respect Aboriginal people and achieve reconciliation within our community. Ms KATRINA HODGKINSON (Burrinjuck) [10.13 a.m.]: I support the Constitution Amendment (Recognition of Aboriginal People) Bill 2010. Recently we were privileged to witness a special smoking ceremony here at Parliament House and to be in the company of two eminent indigenous Australians as the Premier introduced and spoke on this bill, as did the Leader of the Opposition and the Leader of The Nationals. The bill inserts a section into the principal Act, the Constitution Act 1902. Clause 3 states: 2 Recognition of Aboriginal people (1) Parliament, on behalf of the people of New South Wales, acknowledges and honours the Aboriginal people as the State's first people and nations. (2) Parliament, on behalf of the people of New South Wales, recognises that Aboriginal people, as the traditional custodians and occupants of the land in New South Wales: (a) have a spiritual, social, cultural and economic relationship with their traditional lands and waters, and (b) have made and continue to make a unique and lasting contribution to the identity of the State. (3) Nothing in this section creates any legal right or liability, or gives rise to or affects any civil cause of action or right to review an administrative action, or affects the interpretation of any Act or law in force in New South Wales. That addition to our Constitution is a bit decorative but I am happy to support it. Throughout my life, I have had numerous conversations and friendships with many Aboriginal people, and I know that many people in my electorate will be excited today about this amendment to our Constitution going through. I think back many years ago to when I was in kindergarten at Yass Public School. Times were not so great back then; segregation was a significant issue. I can remember one teacher making the young Aboriginal kids sit up on the fence while we all played in the playground and thinking how unfair that was. I had a very dear Aboriginal friend and we would sneak off together and do things like dig up yams and find witchetty grubs. It was a time of great fun. However, it is awful to think that throughout white colonisation of this nation people have not been treated equally. There are all sorts of reasons for that through history, and we must accept history the way it is. But 25858 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY 22 September 2010 perhaps this amendment is one way of assisting reconciliation in regional and urban areas throughout New South Wales, in the same way that Victoria and Queensland have attempted to do by inserting a similar section in their constitutions. My dear friend, Eric Bell, who is an incredible role model to the Yass community, will be pleased with this amendment, as will all his relatives. Uncle Eric is an incredible role model to all people in the Yass community, regardless of colour. He is an inspiration, a hard worker and a great supporter of ensuring that Aboriginal people living in Yass are motivated to improve the local community, whether it is by improving walking trails along the Yass River or participating in work-for-the-dole programs. When work-for-the-dole programs came along Eric was determined to ensure that our local indigenous community was part of that. The program gave people a reason to get out of bed in the morning. For too many years there has been an attitude about welfare, and I think it still a significant issue today. Yesterday I attended a luncheon in Sydney, held by the Australia-Israel Chamber of Commerce.
Recommended publications
  • Endeavour Anniversary

    Endeavour Anniversary

    Episode 10 Teacher Resource 28th April 2020 Endeavour Anniversary Students will investigate Captain Endeavour History Cook’s voyage to Australia on 1. When did the Endeavour set sail from England? board the HMB Endeavour. Students will explore the impact 2. Who led the voyage of discovery on the Endeavour? that British colonisation had on 3. Describe James Cook’s background. the lives of Aboriginal and Torres 4. What did Cook study that would help him to become a ship’s Strait Islander Peoples. captain? 5. Fill in the missing words: By the 18th Century, _________________ had been mapping the globe for centuries, claiming HASS – Year 4 ______________ and resources as their own. (Europeans and land) The journey(s) of AT LEAST ONE 6. Who was Joseph Banks? world navigator, explorer or trader 7. Why did Banks want to travel on the Endeavour? up to the late eighteenth century, including their contacts with other 8. The main aim of the voyage was to travel to… societies and any impacts. 9. What rare event was the Endeavour crew aiming to observe? 10. What was their secret mission? The nature of contact between 11. Who was Tupaia? Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and others, for 12. After leaving Tahiti, where did the Endeavour go? example, the Macassans and the 13. What happen in April 1770? Europeans, and the effects of 14. Complete the following sentence. Australia was known to Europeans these interactions on, for at the time as New___________________. (Holland) example, people and environments. 15. Describe the first contact with Indigenous people.
  • EORA Mapping Aboriginal Sydney 1770–1850 Exhibition Guide

    EORA Mapping Aboriginal Sydney 1770–1850 Exhibition Guide

    Sponsored by It is customary for some Indigenous communities not to mention names or reproduce images associated with the recently deceased. Members of these communities are respectfully advised that a number of people mentioned in writing or depicted in images in the following pages have passed away. Users are warned that there may be words and descriptions that might be culturally sensitive and not normally used in certain public or community contexts. In some circumstances, terms and annotations of the period in which a text was written may be considered Many treasures from the State Library’s inappropriate today. Indigenous collections are now online for the first time at <www.atmitchell.com>. A note on the text The spelling of Aboriginal words in historical Made possible through a partnership with documents is inconsistent, depending on how they were heard, interpreted and recorded by Europeans. Original spelling has been retained in quoted texts, while names and placenames have been standardised, based on the most common contemporary usage. State Library of New South Wales Macquarie Street Sydney NSW 2000 Telephone (02) 9273 1414 Facsimile (02) 9273 1255 TTY (02) 9273 1541 Email [email protected] www.sl.nsw.gov.au www.atmitchell.com Exhibition opening hours: 9 am to 5 pm weekdays, 11 am to 5 pm weekends Eora: Mapping Aboriginal Sydney 1770–1850 was presented at the State Library of New South Wales from 5 June to 13 August 2006. Curators: Keith Vincent Smith, Anthony (Ace) Bourke and, in the conceptual stages, by the late Michael
  • The Future of World Heritage in Australia

    The Future of World Heritage in Australia

    Keeping the Outstanding Exceptional: The Future of World Heritage in Australia Editors: Penelope Figgis, Andrea Leverington, Richard Mackay, Andrew Maclean, Peter Valentine Editors: Penelope Figgis, Andrea Leverington, Richard Mackay, Andrew Maclean, Peter Valentine Published by: Australian Committee for IUCN Inc. Copyright: © 2013 Copyright in compilation and published edition: Australian Committee for IUCN Inc. Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorised without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: Figgis, P., Leverington, A., Mackay, R., Maclean, A., Valentine, P. (eds). (2012). Keeping the Outstanding Exceptional: The Future of World Heritage in Australia. Australian Committee for IUCN, Sydney. ISBN: 978-0-9871654-2-8 Design/Layout: Pixeldust Design 21 Lilac Tree Court Beechmont, Queensland Australia 4211 Tel: +61 437 360 812 [email protected] Printed by: Finsbury Green Pty Ltd 1A South Road Thebarton, South Australia Australia 5031 Available from: Australian Committee for IUCN P.O Box 528 Sydney 2001 Tel: +61 416 364 722 [email protected] http://www.aciucn.org.au http://www.wettropics.qld.gov.au Cover photo: Two great iconic Australian World Heritage Areas - The Wet Tropics and Great Barrier Reef meet in the Daintree region of North Queensland © Photo: K. Trapnell Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the chapter authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the editors, the Australian Committee for IUCN, the Wet Tropics Management Authority or the Australian Conservation Foundation or those of financial supporter the Commonwealth Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities.
  • Yarnupings Issue 1 March 2018

    Yarnupings Issue 1 March 2018

    March 2018 Issue 2 Aboriginal Heritage Office Yarnupings www.aboriginalheritage.org In this Edition: ∗ NSW Aboriginal Knockout in Dubbo 2018 ∗ It’s a Funny World ∗ Is it possible? ∗ Kids page... Nature Page ∗ Crossword & Quizerama ∗ Book Review: A Fortunate Life by A.B Facey ∗ This Months Recipe : Chicken Pot Roast ∗ Strathfield Sites ∗ YarnUp Review: Guest Speaker Tjimpuna ∗ Walk of the Month: West Head Loop Mackerel Beach -West Head Loop Shell Fish -Hooks Page 2 For at least the last thousand years BC (Before Cook) the waters of Warringá (Middle Har- bour), Kay -ye -my (North Harbour), Weé -rong (Sydney Cove) and other Sydney estuaries were the scenes of people using shell fish -hooks to catch a feed. With no known surviving oral tradition for how and who would make the fish -hooks and use them in this area, the historical and archaeological records become more important. What do we know? Shell fish -hooks were observed and reported on by a number of people from the First Fleet. They mention being made and used by local women. “Considering the quickness with which they are finished, the excellence of the work, if it be inspected, is admirable”, Watkin Tench said on witnessing Barangaroo making one on the north shore. First Fleet painting of fish -hook (T. Watling) The manufacturing process involved the use of a strong shell. So far the only archaeological evidence is from the Turbo species. Pointed stone files were used to create the shape and then file down the edges to the recognisable form. Use -wear analysis on files has confirmed that they were used on shell as well as wood, bone and plant material.
  • Extension Activities in Australian History Sample

    Extension Activities in Australian History Sample

    EBOOK CODE: REAU7079 Sample Contents Teachers' Notes 4 German Settlers Australian Curriculum Links 4 Student Information Page 38 Activity Page 1 39 SECTION 1: CAPTAIN JAMES COOK Activity Page 2 40 Captain James Cook And Tupaia Student Information Page 6 SECTION 4: NOTABLE COLONIAL PEOPLE Activity Page 1 7 Mary Reibey (1777 - 1855) Activity Page 2 8 Student Information Page 42 Activity Page 3 9 Activity Page 1 43 Activity Page 2 44 The Voyage To New Zealand Student Information Page 10 William Barak (1823 – 1903) Activity Page 11 Student Information Page 45 Activity Page 1 46 First Contact With The Māori People Activity Page 2 47 Student Information Page 12 Activity Page 1 13 William James Farrer (1845 – 1906) Activity Page 2 14 Student Information Page 48 Activity Page 1 49 SECTION 2: THE COLONISERS AND NATIVE PEOPLES Activity Page 2 50 First Impressions Of The Eora Student Information Page 16 Activity Page 1 17 SECTION 5: WORKING FOR AUSTRALIANS' RIGHTS Activity Page 2 18 The Changing Role Of Australian Women Activity Page 3 19 Student Information Page 52 Activity Page 53 On The Other Side Of The World Student Information Page 20 A Woman’s Right to Vote Activity Page 1 21 Student Information Page 54 Activity Page 2 22 Activity Page 1 55 Activity Page 2 56 News From Sydney Cove Student Information Page 23 Working For Indigenous Rights Activity Page 1 24 Student Information Page 57 Activity Page 2 25 Activity Page 1 58 Activity Page 2 59 Australia’s Natural Wonders Student Information Page 26 Senator Neville Bonner (1922-1999) Activity
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

    Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

    New South Wales Legislative Assembly PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Fifty-Seventh Parliament First Session Wednesday, 17 June 2020 Authorised by the Parliament of New South Wales TABLE OF CONTENTS Bills ......................................................................................................................................................... 2595 Crimes Amendment (Special Care Offences) Bill 2020 ..................................................................... 2595 Mental Health and Cognitive Impairment Forensic Provisions Bill 2020 ......................................... 2595 Returned .......................................................................................................................................... 2595 Law Enforcement Conduct Commission Amendment Bill 2020 ....................................................... 2595 First Reading ................................................................................................................................... 2595 Announcements ...................................................................................................................................... 2595 Thought Leadership Event .................................................................................................................. 2595 Notices .................................................................................................................................................... 2595 Presentation ........................................................................................................................................
  • When Repatriation Doesn't Happen: Relationships Created Through Cultural Property Negotiations

    When Repatriation Doesn't Happen: Relationships Created Through Cultural Property Negotiations

    University of Denver Digital Commons @ DU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 2020 When Repatriation Doesn’t Happen: Relationships Created Through Cultural Property Negotiations Ellyn DeMuynck Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd Part of the Museum Studies Commons, and the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons When Repatriation Doesn’t Happen: Relationships Created Through Cultural Property Negotiations __________________ A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the College of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences University of Denver __________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts ___________________ by Ellyn DeMuynck March 2020 Advisor: Christina Kreps Author: Ellyn DeMuynck Title: When Repatriation Doesn’t Happen: Relationships Created Through Cultural Property Negotiations Advisor: Christina Kreps Degree Date: March 2020 Abstract This thesis analyzes the discourse of repatriation in connection to the Encounters exhibition held by the National Museum of Australia in 2015. Indigenous Australian and Torres Strait Islander artifacts were loaned to the Australian museum by the British Museum. At the close of the exhibition, one item, the Gweagal shield, was claimed for repatriation. The repatriation request had not been approved at the time of this research. The Gweagal shield is a historically significant artifact for Indigenous and non- Indigenous Australians. Analysis takes into account the political economy of the two museums and situates the exhibition within the relevant museum policies. This thesis argues that, while the shield has not yet returned to Australia, the discussions about what a return would mean are part of the larger process of repatriation. It is during these discussions that the rights to material culture are negotiated.
  • Proposed Redevelopment of Gosford Hospital

    Proposed Redevelopment of Gosford Hospital

    Proposed Redevelopment of Gosford Hospital Proposed Redevelopment of Gosford Hospital Preliminary Aboriginal Heritage Assessment Report to City Plan Heritage June 2015 Page i Proposed Redevelopment of Gosford Hospital EXECUTIVE SUMMARY City Plan Heritage has engaged Artefact Heritage to prepare a Preliminary Aboriginal Heritage Assessment for the proposed redevelopment of Gosford Hospital (the study area). The study area includes land bounded by Racecourse Road to the north, Showground Road to the east, Faunce Street to the south and Cape Street/Beane Street to the west. The aims of this report are to identify any Aboriginal sites which may be present within the study area and to assess the potential for as yet unidentified Aboriginal archaeology to be present within the study area. The background research indicates that the geology of the study area consists of Terrigal Formation deposits, which supported a rich array of flora and fauna. Narara Creek is located 600 metres to the north-west of the study area; which drains directly into Brisbane Water to the south. Therefore the area would have had a large array of subsistence resources available to Aboriginal people. The study area is located on a ridge top, which offers an elevated, dry camping location, surrounded by numerous subsistence resources. No previously recorded Aboriginal sites were located within the study area. An extensive search of the Aboriginal Heritage Information System (AHIMS) indicated that forty-one Aboriginal sites were located in the surrounding region. The AHIMS search revealed that spatial patterning of sites in the region are situated outside of the Gosford developed areas; located within surrounding bushland.
  • The 1770 Landscape of Botany Bay, the Plants Collected by Banks and Solander and Rehabilitation of Natural Vegetation at Kurnell

    The 1770 Landscape of Botany Bay, the Plants Collected by Banks and Solander and Rehabilitation of Natural Vegetation at Kurnell

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Hochschulschriftenserver - Universität Frankfurt am Main Backdrop to encounter: the 1770 landscape of Botany Bay, the plants collected by Banks and Solander and rehabilitation of natural vegetation at Kurnell Doug Benson1 and Georgina Eldershaw2 1Botanic Gardens Trust, Mrs Macquaries Rd Sydney 2000 AUSTRALIA email [email protected] 2Parks & Wildlife Division, Dept of Environment and Conservation (NSW), PO Box 375 Kurnell NSW 2231 AUSTRALIA email [email protected] Abstract: The first scientific observations on the flora of eastern Australia were made at Botany Bay in April–May 1770. We discuss the landscapes of Botany Bay and particularly of the historic landing place at Kurnell (lat 34˚ 00’ S, long 151˚ 13’ E) (about 16 km south of central Sydney), as described in the journals of Lieutenant James Cook and Joseph Banks on the Endeavour voyage in 1770. We list 132 plant species that were collected at Botany Bay by Banks and Daniel Solander, the first scientific collections of Australian flora. The list is based on a critical assessment of unpublished lists compiled by authors who had access to the collection of the British Museum (now Natural History Museum), together with species from material at National Herbarium of New South Wales that has not been previously available. The list includes Bidens pilosa which has been previously regarded as an introduced species. In 1770 the Europeans set foot on Aboriginal land of the Dharawal people. Since that time the landscape has been altered in response to a succession of different land-uses; farming and grazing, commemorative tree planting, parkland planting, and pleasure ground and tourist visitation.
  • Australia and the Pacific

    Australia and the Pacific

    AUSTRALIA AND THE PACIFIC: THE AMBIVALENT PLACE OF PACIFIC PEOPLES WITHIN CONTEMPORARY AUSTRALIA Scott William Mackay, BA (Hons), BSc July 2018 Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Australian Indigenous Studies Program School of Culture and Communication The University of Melbourne 0000-0002-5889 – Abstract – My thesis examines the places (real and symbolic) accorded to Pacific peoples within the historical production of an Australian nation and in the imaginary of Australian nationalism. It demonstrates how these places reflect and inform the ways in which Australia engages with the Pacific region, and the extent to which Australia considers itself a part of or apart from the Pacific. While acknowledging the important historical and contemporary differences between the New Zealand and Australian contexts, I deploy theoretical concepts and methods developed within the established field of New Zealand- centred Pacific Studies to identify and analyse what is occurring in the much less studied Australian-Pacific context. In contrast to official Australian discourse, the experiences of Pacific people in Australia are differentiated from those of other migrant communities because of: first, Australia’s colonial and neo-colonial histories of control over Pacific land and people; and second, Pacific peoples' important and unique kinships with Aboriginal Australians. Crucially the thesis emphasises the significant diversity (both cultural and national) of the Pacific experience in Australia. My argument is advanced first by a historicisation of Australia’s formal engagements with Pacific people, detailing intersecting narratives of their migration to Australia and Australia’s colonial and neo- colonial engagements within the Pacific region.
  • NTSCORP Ltd Annual Report 08/09

    NTSCORP Ltd Annual Report 08/09

    Section / Page Letter of Presentation 2 chair Report 3 ceo Review 4 our company’s Purpose, Vision & Values 7 the Board of Directors 9 executive team 15 Management and operational Structure 17 corporate governance 21 Sustainability and corporate Responsibility 23 Human Resource Management 25 our community - our Service 26 overview of ntScoRP operations 27 overview of the native title environment in nSW 29 increased Policy activity and consultation 32 ntScorp Performing the Functions of a 33 native title Representative Body other Functions 34 ntScoRP Ltd overview of native title Matters in nSW 35 and the act in 2008-2009 annual Report Judicial and administrative Decisions 36 Report on Performance by Matter 37 08/09 ntScoRP Limited Financial Statements 42 contents ANNUaL RePoRt the Hon. Jenny Macklin MP Minister for Families, Housing, 2008/09 community Services and indigenous affairs Parliament House CANBeRRa ACT 2600 Chairperson’S Dear Minister, Message RE: 2008 – 2009 ANNUAL REPORT I have pleasure in presenting the Annual Report for NTSCORP Limited which incorporates the audited financial statements for the financial year ended 30 June 2009. This is in accordance with the Commonwealth Government 2008 – 2009 General Terms and Conditions Relating to Native Title Program Funding Agreements. On behalf of the directors and members 2007-2008 was a very successful year, Another initiative which holds promise for Yours sincerely, of NTSCORP Limited (NTSCORP), I during which the Githabul consent NSW is the Victorian Settlement Framework, acknowledge my Ngunnawal Elders, other determination and the Byron Bay announced in early 2009. The framework Elders, native title claimants and other Bundjalung ILUAs were completed.
  • On the Sacred Clay of Botany Bay: Landings, National Memorialization, and Multiple Sovereignties

    On the Sacred Clay of Botany Bay: Landings, National Memorialization, and Multiple Sovereignties

    On the Sacred Clay of Botany Bay: Landings, National Memorialization, and Multiple Sovereignties by Ann McGrath (Australian National University) Abstract To mark the federation of the Australian colonies in January 1901, a re-enactment of the landing of British navigator Captain James Cook was performed at Botany Bay, New South Wales. This involved not only the arrival of Cook’s ‘discovery’ party ashore, but also a violent conflict with the local Gweagal/Dharawal people. The Landing Play brought together costumed professional actors and a troupe of Aboriginal performers from many parts of Australia. As indelible as the Cook landing story may seem as a foundational narrative replete with British flag raising performances, Australia’s national story has never been entirely unified, homogenous or settled. Spectacularly adorned in animal skins and bird feathers, the Indigenous troupe used sacred white clay to paint their faces and bodies in distinctive designs, signifying the deep history narratives of their respective Indigenous nations. Both the European and Indigenous Australian actors re-enacted histories associated with their respective ancestral heroes on lands they deemed sacred. These contested performances of sovereignty, of ‘landings’ and of history, were mutually witnessed and in conversation with each other. Yet, while contemporary politicians and elites were reifying Captain Cook’s legacy, much of the general audience ignored expectations, invading the VIP tent and cheering not the pompous Captain Cook oratory, but the Aboriginal actors who charged and attacked Cook’s party. A Maori Native Affairs Minister from New Zealand and three Maori chiefs watched the 1901 spectacle. In contrast to the Indigenous recognition enjoyed in neighboring New Zealand, the Australian government today continues to resist a constitutionally recognised Indigenous advisory body, let alone to discuss discrete parliamentary representation or a Treaty.