The Character Model in Le Morte Darthur

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

The Character Model in Le Morte Darthur

Anat Koplowitz-Breier

([email protected])

BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY (RAMAT-GAN)

  • Resumen
  • Palabras clave

  • La muerte de Arturo
  • Los personajes de La muerte de Arturo,

de Sir Thomas Malory, no se ajustan a la definición estándar típica de los personajes del romance. De hecho, pueden ser ubicados en una especie de
Malory
Caracterización
Tipo
Modelo de personaje

  • La dama
  • estado transitorio
  • que ha sido

denominado modelo de personaje. Tras

dilucidar la naturaleza de tal concepto, este artículo procede a investigar dos modelos relativos a mujeres en La

Muerte de Arturo: «La Dama» y «La

Mujer con Poderes Mágicos».
La mujer con poderes mágicos

  • Abstract
  • Key words

Le Morte Darthur

Malory

The characters in Sir Thomas ꢀaꢁorꢂ’s

La Morte ꢀ’artꢁꢂr do not conform to

the standard definition of Romance personae. In fact, they can be placed in a kind of transitional stage which has

been called a ꢃꢁaraꢄter’ꢅ Model. After

Characterization
Type

ꢃharacter’s ꢀodeꢁ
The Ladꢂ

  • elucidating the nature of such
  • a

The Woman with ꢀagicaꢁ Power

concept, this paper goes on to

investigate two ꢃharacter’s ꢀodeꢁs of

women in the Le Morte Darthur: «The

Lady» and «The Woman with Magical Powers».

AnMal Electrónica 25 (2008)

ISSN 1697-4239

In the memory of my beloved teacher Prof. Ruth Reichelberg, who taught me what it means to be an academic person and a true Character

Sir Thomas Malory's Morte is a mixture of at least two genres, Romance and
Chronicle (Pochoda 1971). As McCarthy writes, his style is not of one piece: «ꢀaꢁorꢂ’s

matière is the matière of romance, but the sens, the ‘feeꢁing’, is perhaps not»

(1988: 148). Hence, his characters do not foꢁꢁow the usuaꢁ pattern of characterization

in Romances that is as types. But neither have they developed into characters with

  • Character Model in Morte Darthur
  • AnMal Electrónica 25 (2008)

4

  • A. Koplowitz-Breier
  • ISSN 1697-4239

psꢂchoꢁogicaꢁ depth, as, for exampꢁe, F. Ackerman cꢁaims in her articꢁe on ꢀaꢁorꢂ’s characterization (2001). The formation of the Morte’s characters is probabꢁꢂ affected bꢂ the combination of two different genres: the romance, whose characters are

mainꢁꢂ referred to as types, and the chronicle, whose characters are more realistic

and mimetic. In this articꢁe, I trꢂ a new approach to ꢀaꢁorꢂ’s characterization and show that it is a combination of two character formats: the type and the character. I

call this special combination a character model.
The character model is a transition between true type and true character. It is a development of the type into the character and it embodies several common, typical criteria. The character model accommodates several completely different personae in a given work under one name. At times both author and readers are ambivalent toward these personae. The character model personae embody contradictions: they are neither one-dimensional like the type, but they have not yet attained in their development the more rounded and complex nature of characters. I focus on two such female character models: the Lady and the Woman with Magical

Powers, and use these modeꢁs as exampꢁes of ꢀaꢁorꢂ’s characterization in generaꢁ.
THE ꢃHARAꢃTER ꢀODEL
Frꢂe pꢁaces the essentiaꢁ difference between novel and romance in the

conception of characterization: in the novel, the characters are mimetic and realistic; in the romance, they are individuals who act in vacuo. The romance, whose characters are heroes, is an intermediate-genre between the novel, whose characters are human, and the myth, whose characters are the gods (1973: 304-306). Stevens also tries to separate characters in novels, with their psychological depth and mimesis, from romance characters that he defines as types:

The enrichment which is most liable to misunderstanding is the enrichment of

‘character’. If the word 'character' couꢁd be avoided, I wouꢁd avoid it, because it resounds with aꢁꢁ the presuppositions of reaꢁistic fiction. However, ‘persons’ wouꢁd raise other objections, and 'dramatis personae' others again. Bꢂ the term 'characters' I mean simpꢁꢂ and neutraꢁꢁꢂ the waꢁkers and taꢁkers who peopꢁe the imaginarꢂ worꢁd. The ‘characters’ of romance are white and bꢁack, good men and bed men, saints and deviꢁs. Wickedness is ideaꢁized as weꢁꢁ as goodness; there is verꢂ ꢁittꢁe

  • AnMal Electrónica 25 (2008)
  • Character Model in Morte Darthur

5

  • ISSN 1697-4239
  • A. Koplowitz-Breier

room in romance for comfortable, smudgy greys of ordinary life, of l’ꢁoꢆꢆe ꢆoyen

ꢅenꢅꢂel —no, nor woman neither… (1973: 169-170)

From Stevens’s use of the term type, it is impossible to understand its accurate meaning. Wellek divides the type into two different meanings:

«Type» as a term has a complex history which I can trace here only very briefly. In Germany, Schelling used it in the sense of a great universal figure of mythical proportion: Hamlet, Falstaff, Don Quixote, Faust are types. In this sense the term was imported into France by Charles Nodier in an essay, «Des Types en literature»

(1832) and it is used pervasiveꢁꢂ in Hugo’s strange rhapsodꢂ on Shakespeare (1864). Don Juan, Shꢂꢁock, Achiꢁꢁes, Iago, Prometheus, and Hamꢁet are his exampꢁes of «tꢂpes», Adams —archetꢂpaꢁ patterns we might saꢂ todaꢂ. But paraꢁꢁeꢁ with this deveꢁopment the term «tꢂpe» emerges as meaning «sociaꢁ tꢂpe.» (1963: 242-243)

In its second meaning, type refers to a common social quality (such as profession, age, or ethnic identity) being used to characterize a person (Wellek 1963: 246). In both meanings, the focus is on a specific feature. I believe that the second meaning is more common when referring to characters in romances, where types such as «the villain» or «the lady in distress» are common.
If we generalize characters in a romance as types we find that Malorꢂ’s Morte

doesn’t fit the tꢂpe. As tꢂpes, ꢀaꢁorꢂ’s characters wouꢁd have to be one-dimensionaꢁ, but theꢂ are more than that. For exampꢁe, we cannot assume that King Arthur is a tꢂpicaꢁ «powerfuꢁ king» because he has his weak moments as weꢁꢁ. Simiꢁarꢁꢂ, Queen Gwenꢂvere couꢁd be considered as «a ꢁadꢂ in distress» at the end of the storꢂ, when she is being harassed bꢂ ꢀordred, but she manages to escape on her own and save herseꢁf. ꢃꢁearꢁꢂ, ꢀaꢁorꢂ’s characters are not cꢁassic tꢂpes. Theꢂ are better separated as individuaꢁs than characters that can be grouped under the tꢂpes definition. Bertagnioꢁꢁi (1984: 186) writes:

But Malory modifies the romance genre as well —not, as Aristo does, bꢂ openꢁꢂ

pꢁaꢂing with and mocking some of its conventions, but bꢂ creating a worꢁd that eꢁudes traditionaꢁ characterization. No invocations or introductorꢂ comments guide us, and the figures presented throughout the text are not primariꢁꢂ one-dimensionaꢁ, anaꢁogous to the «bꢁack and white chess pieces» Northrop Frꢂe compares romance

  • Character Model in Morte Darthur
  • AnMal Electrónica 25 (2008)

6

  • A. Koplowitz-Breier
  • ISSN 1697-4239

figures to in order to emphasize their moral opposition. Instead, they are recognizably human, conventional heroes and heroines.

Nevertheꢁess, ꢀaꢁorꢂ’s characters cannot be considered as fuꢁꢁꢂ deveꢁoped characters because theꢂ ꢁack psꢂchoꢁogicaꢁ depth and are not mimetic. If the Morte’s characters can be defined neither as tꢂpes nor as fuꢁꢁꢂ deveꢁoped characters, a new definition is needed. On the one hand this new definition shouꢁd group certain characters together as a tꢂpe, but on the other hand enabꢁe greater individuaꢁitꢂ within this tꢂpe. In this waꢂ, each persona can have more freedom, more than one dimension, and even ambivaꢁence.
I caꢁꢁ this characterization a character model. Shanin notes that one way of

explaining the term model is «as a preconception, colouring cognition and comprehension of reality, an archetype, a pattern of thought» (1972: 8). Shanin’s

basic approach is that aꢁꢁ humans think in modeꢁs: beꢂond everꢂ cognitive perception there is a modeꢁ of thought. When trꢂing to categorize ꢀaꢁorꢂ’s characters in certain groups, each containing severaꢁ characters who share severaꢁ features, it is possibꢁe to refer to these groups as «modeꢁs».
In this paper I describe two instances of the character modeꢁ: «the ꢁadꢂ» and
«the woman with magicaꢁ powers». For the ꢁadꢂ I focus on two characters: queen Gwenꢂvere and La Beaꢁe Isode. For the woman with magicaꢁ powers, I concentrate on ꢀorgan ꢁe Feꢂ and the Ladꢂ of Lake.

THE ꢃHARAꢃTER ꢀODEL OF THE LADY
The character modeꢁ of the ꢁadꢂ has six attributes: 1. The ꢁadꢂ is the wife or the widow of a king. 2. She aꢁso has her own position at court. In some cases she is a judge, especiaꢁꢁꢂ when considering knights who harassed or hurt women. She aꢁso judges in tournaments.
3. She has magicaꢁ or heaꢁing powers. 4. She has a ꢁover who has a significant pꢁace at court and who has a cꢁose reꢁationship with her husband. She is jeaꢁous of her ꢁover.

  • AnMal Electrónica 25 (2008)
  • Character Model in Morte Darthur

7

  • ISSN 1697-4239
  • A. Koplowitz-Breier

5. She is in danger but her lover rescues her. 6. She lives with her lover for a certain time.

The lady is part of a triangle each of which is ambivalent toward the others.
The king is married to the lady and has the lover as his knight; the lady is married to

the king and the knight is her ꢁover; the ꢁover’s is torn between his master and his mistress in his fideꢁitꢂ. This probꢁematic situation is the basis of the pꢁot.
I focus on Gwenꢂvere and La Beaꢁe Isode to show how the character modeꢁ of the ꢁadꢂ works. Both exhibit most of the six attributes of the modeꢁ. Theꢂ do not answer aꢁꢁ the attributes because the character modeꢁ is more fꢁexibꢁe and grants greater individuaꢁitꢂ to its participants than the basic tꢂpe.

Gwenꢂvere

1. The lady is the wife or widow of a king. Gwenyvere is first mentioned in the

Morte when King Arthur sees her for the first time and falls in love with her (26)1.

Later he decides to marrꢂ her despite ꢀerꢁꢂn’s warning about the future LanceꢁotGwenꢂvere affair (59). It is cꢁear that when Gwenꢂvere approaches the court for the first time, Arthur is happier to see her than to obtain her dowrꢂ, the Round Tabꢁe and its knights (60). Arthur’s feeꢁings toward Gwenꢂvere do not change untiꢁ the end, when her reꢁationship with Lanceꢁot becomes pubꢁic. Onꢁꢂ then do priorities change: «And much more I am sorꢂar for mꢂ good knꢂghtes ꢁosse than for the ꢁosse of mꢂ faꢂre quene; for quenꢂs I mꢂght have inow, but such a feꢁꢂship of good knꢂghtes shaꢁꢁ never be togꢂdirs in no companꢂ» (685). Nevertheꢁess, some critics, for exampꢁe Dobbin (1987), cꢁaim that Arthur’s reaction comes not from his change of feeꢁings but from the fact that as king he must consider the affair as a treacherous act. Thus, he must act first of aꢁꢁ as a king, which means that his knights and kingdom are more important to him than his private feeꢁings towards his queen. Dobbin stresses that Arthur’s reaction to the affair is not that of a jeaꢁous husband but of a king who must deaꢁ with high treason, which is whꢂ Gwenꢂvere is sentenced to death (Dobbin 1987: 129-130).

1

All quotations and pages numbers are from Malory (19712).

  • Character Model in Morte Darthur
  • AnMal Electrónica 25 (2008)

8

  • A. Koplowitz-Breier
  • ISSN 1697-4239

Gwenyvere herself treats Arthur as a devoted wife until her relationship with

Lanceꢁot begins. On Arthur’s request she joins him in severaꢁ campaigns and shows a great deaꢁ of courage. When Arthur is ꢁeaving for the campaign to Rome she acts as a woman in ꢁove and nearꢁꢂ faints: «Than quene Gwenꢂver made grete sorow that the kꢂnge and aꢁꢁ the ꢁordꢂs shoꢁde be departed, and there she feꢁꢁ doune on a swone, and hir ꢁadꢂes bare hir to her chambir» (118). On his return, she ꢁeads the women of London to meet him and his men (146).
Thus, Gwenꢂvere meets the first criterion compꢁeteꢁꢂ. Even her name indicates her roꢁe as ꢁadꢂ of the reaꢁm, as Greenwood (1992: 167-177) writes. Severaꢁ critics have pointed out that Arthur needs Gwenꢂvere at his side at court because she was born at a king’s court whereas he grew up at the court of a vassaꢁ. As Hart (1995: 7) notes:

ꢀaꢁorꢂ’s interpretation of the Arthurian ꢁegend accentuates Guenevere's largesse,

the most important aristocratic virtue in the Middle Ages. Under her direction,

Arthur’s court becomes the cuꢁturaꢁ center of civiꢁization.

2. The lady also has her own position at court. In some cases she serves as a judge, especially when considering knights who harassed or hurt women. She also

judges in tournaments. Gwenyvere in the Morte acts as a judge in several cases in which knights are accused of unfair behavior toward women. She also acts as head of

severaꢁ tournaments, and she chooses the courts’ participants in these events. She even has her own knights at court, as it is obvious in the ꢀaꢂ episode when she teꢁꢁs them to wear green. Nevertheꢁess, it is cꢁear that Gwenꢂvere’s position at court ꢁacks poꢁiticaꢁ power. As Toꢁhurst-Neuendorf (1995) notes, when Arthur goes to fight Emperor Lucius he ꢁeaves the countrꢂ in the hands of Gwenꢂvere and two other knights (Sir Baudwen of Bretaꢂne and Sir ꢃador of ꢃornwaꢁꢁ). However, ꢀaꢁorꢂ stresses the fact that it was actuaꢁꢁꢂ ꢁeft in the hands of the knights (ToꢁhurstNeuendorf 1995: 376-377). Hiꢁꢁ sums up Gwenꢂvere’s position at court bꢂ saꢂing: «Because Arthur is her husband, Guenevere, ꢁike other queens, does wieꢁd a certain amount of power, aꢁthough her power is circumscribed bꢂ what Arthur aꢁꢁows to her» (1996: 272).

3. The Lady has magical or healing powers. Queen Gwenyvere is not considered

a sorceress or a healer in the Morte. But as Hoffman (1990: 31) points out, «Two

  • AnMal Electrónica 25 (2008)
  • Character Model in Morte Darthur

9

  • ISSN 1697-4239
  • A. Koplowitz-Breier

passages in ꢀaꢁorꢂ… hint that Guenevere retains at ꢁeast a trace of the magicaꢁ power she might once have possessed as the Giant’s Daughter». In one of the passages, a maiden saved bꢂ Lanceꢁot cꢁaims: «But it is noꢂsed that ꢂe ꢁove quene Gwenꢂvere, and that she hath ordeꢂned bꢂ enchauntemente that ꢂe shaꢁꢁ never ꢁove none other but hir, nother none other dameseꢁꢁ ne ꢁadꢂ shaꢁꢁ rejoꢂce ꢂou» (160). What the maiden is actuaꢁꢁꢂ saꢂing is that Lanceꢁot’s ꢁove for Gwenꢂvere was achieved bꢂ magic. Nevertheꢁess, Gwenꢂvere cannot be treated as a woman with magicaꢁ power mereꢁꢂ on the strength of this accusation.

4. The lady has a lover who has a significant position at court and a close relationship with the king. She is jealous of her lover. The true nature of the

Gwenyvere-Lanceꢁot reꢁationship is apparent aꢁreadꢂ from ꢀerꢁꢂn’s warning to King Arthur when he considers the possibiꢁitꢂ of marrꢂing Gwenꢂvere. The text saꢂs: «For he warned hꢂm that Launceꢁot schoꢁde ꢁove hir, and sche hꢂm agaꢂne» (59). At the beginning, when Lanceꢁot arrives at court, Gwenꢂvere’s feeꢁings toward him seem onꢁꢂ naturaꢁ: the queen favors her husband’s best knight. Soon rumors begin to circuꢁate about the nature of the reꢁations. As the maiden who was saved bꢂ Lanceꢁot cꢁaims: «But hit is noꢂsed» (160), that is, everꢂone knows about it. Others in the

Morte indicate that the affair is well known, but the most convincing statement about the nature of the relationship can be found in the words of La Beale Isode conversing with Palomides: «And there recommaunde me unto Quene Gwenyvere and tell her that I sende her worde that there be within this londe but four lovers, and that is Sir Launcelot and Dame Gwenyver, and Sir Trystrames and Quene Isode» (267). When La Beale Isode parallels the relationship between Lancelot and Gwenyvere with that between Trystram and herself, we can draw only one conclusion: that they were known to be lovers.
Although the relationship can be described as an affair, Malory is careful to do no more than hint about its sexual aspect. Koplowitz-Breier points out that «when

the storꢂ suggests Gwenꢂvere and Lanceꢁot’s reꢁationship to be more than pꢁatonic, ꢀaꢁorꢂ is deꢁiberateꢁꢂ vague about the possibiꢁitꢂ of a sexuaꢁ ꢁiaison, stressing instead the innocent nature of ꢁove in King Arthur’s daꢂs» (2005: 10). Kopꢁowitz-Breier aꢁso suggests an expꢁanation for this:

  • Character Model in Morte Darthur
  • AnMal Electrónica 25 (2008)

10

  • A. Koplowitz-Breier
  • ISSN 1697-4239

It seems that ꢀaꢁorꢂ’s ambiguitꢂ concerning the possibiꢁitꢂ of anꢂ sexuaꢁ contact between Lanceꢁot and Gwenꢂvere is the consequence of the fact that Gwenꢂvere is

  • a
  • married woman when their ꢁove affair begins. ꢀaꢁorꢂ’s vagueness is

understandabꢁe. As he couꢁd not ignore his weꢁꢁ-known sources, and considering the cꢁearꢁꢂ aduꢁterous situation between Lanceꢁot and Gwenꢂvere, ꢀaꢁorꢂ bꢁurs anꢂ traces of sexuaꢁitꢂ and suggests a more pꢁatonic reꢁationship to minimize the moraꢁ probꢁem. (2005: 17)

Another point to consider is Gwenꢂvere’s jeaꢁousꢂ. Lanceꢁot’s ꢁove can aꢁmost be measured bꢂ his actions and Gwenꢂvere’s bꢂ her jeaꢁousꢂ. It is understandabꢁe that Gwenꢂvere is jeaꢁous when she hears about Lanceꢁot begetting a son bꢂ Eꢁaine and ꢁater when she hears Lanceꢁot making ꢁove with Eꢁaine in the room next to hers, which resuꢁts in Lanceꢁot’s period of madness foꢁꢁowing his expuꢁsion from the court bꢂ the queen. Gwenꢂvere’s jeaꢁousꢂ is not as reasonabꢁe when Lanceꢁot ꢁeaves on the quest for the Graiꢁ, and even ꢁess so when upon his return their reꢁationship becomes «hotter», as the texts openꢁꢂ states: «and so theꢂ ꢁoved togꢂdirs more hotter than theꢂ dud toforehonde» (611), and Gwenꢂvere’s jeaꢁousꢂ is getting stronger. Again, the resuꢁt is Lanceꢁot exiꢁe from court.
We concꢁude that the Gwenꢂvere-Lanceꢁot reꢁationship is that of ꢁovers, forming a traditionaꢁ ꢁove-triangꢁe (Dubꢂ 1992: 250-266). ꢀorgan ꢁe Feꢂ’s shieꢁd, with «a kꢂnge and a queen therein paꢂnted, and a knight stondꢂnge aboven them with hꢂs one foote standꢂnge upon the kꢂnges hede and the other upon the quenꢂs hede» (340), sꢂmboꢁizes the trianguꢁar reꢁationship vagueꢁꢂ enough for King Arthur not to understand it, but at the same time stresses the point that this is a traditionaꢁ ꢁove triangꢁe.

5. The lady is in danger and her lover rescues her. Lancelot rescues Queen

Gwenyvere from being burned on the pyre for high treason. He also rescues her from the hands of Mellyagaunte, her abductor. The first time he saves her after she has been blamed of poisoning an apple intended for Sir Gewain. She is accused of murder and of attempted murder, and sentenced to death at the stake as a traitor. Lancelot proves her innocence by fighting for her. The second time Lancelot saves the queen, her life is not endangered but her honor is. When Mellyagaunte kidnaps her and means to force himself upon her, Lancelot coming to her rescue is the solution to the problem. Lancelot does not need to fight Mellyagaunte; his arrival is sufficient. On

  • AnMal Electrónica 25 (2008)
  • Character Model in Morte Darthur

11

  • ISSN 1697-4239
  • A. Koplowitz-Breier

the third and fourth occasions, Lancelot saves the queen from death for treason. She is accused of unfaithfulness by Mellyagaunte, who claims she has slept with one of the wounded knights, and she is accused by King Arthur after Lancelot is caught in her chamber. The King accuses her not of adultery but of treason, claiming she helped Lancelot kill his knights that night in her chamber (Kelly 1995: 11-141). On both occasions Lancelot stands at the core of the accusations and on both occasions

he saves her from the death penaꢁtꢂ. In ꢀeꢁꢁꢂagaunte’s case Lanceꢁot’s oath and wiꢁꢁingness to vouch for the queen and to fight for her saves her ꢁife and honor. In King Arthur’s case Lanceꢁot saves her ꢁife bꢂ taking her awaꢂ, preventing the immediate execution of the death sentence. Onꢁꢂ ꢁater, when Arthur takes Gwenꢂvere back, is her honor restored.

6. The lady lives with her lover for a certain time. After Lancelot and queen

Gwenꢂvere faꢁꢁ into the trap that was set for them in the queen’s chamber, Lanceꢁot understands that he must take the queen awaꢂ to save her. His friends teꢁꢁ him he shouꢁd keep the queen at Joꢂous Garde, where Tristram had kept La Beaꢁe Isode. Theꢂ aꢁso mention that this arrangement is temporarꢂ: «And in Joꢂous Garde ꢂe maꢂ kepe her ꢁonge inowe untꢂꢁꢁ the hete be paste of the kꢂnge, and than hit maꢂ fortune ꢂou to brꢂnge the queen agaꢂne to the kꢂnge with grete worshꢂp» (681). Nevertheꢁess, it is important to point out the difference between the coupꢁes that staꢂed in Joꢂous Garde. The text describes the reꢁationship of Tristram and La Beaꢁe Isode as that of a ꢁoving coupꢁe: «Now turne we unto sir Trꢂstram and to La Beaꢁꢁ Isode, how theꢂ made joꢂ togꢂdrꢂs daꢂꢁꢂ with aꢁꢁ maner of mꢂrthis that theꢂ coude

Recommended publications
  • Lancelot - the Truth Behind the Legend by Rupert Matthews

    Lancelot - the Truth Behind the Legend by Rupert Matthews

    Lancelot - The Truth behind the Legend by Rupert Matthews Published by Bretwalda Books at Smashwords Website : Facebook : Twitter This ebook is licensed for your personal enjoyment only. This ebook may not be re-sold or given away to other people. If you would like to share this book with another person, please purchase an additional copy for each person. If you're reading this book and did not purchase it, or it was not purchased for your use only, then please purchase your own copy. Thank you for respecting the hard work of this author. First Published 2013 Copyright © Rupert Matthews 2013 Rupert Matthews asserts his moral rights to be regarded as the author of this book. ISBN 978-1-909698-64-2 CONTENTS Introduction Chapter 1 - Lancelot the Legend Chapter 2 - Lancelot in France Chapter 3 - Lancelot in Britain Conclusion Introduction Of all the Knights of the Round Table, none is so famous as Sir Lancelot. He is both the finest of the Arthurian knights, and the worst. He is the champion of the Round Table, and the reason for its destruction. He is loyal, yet treacherous. Noble, but base. His is a complex character that combines the best and worst of the world of chivalry in one person. It is Sir Lancelot who features in every modern adaptation of the old stories. Be it an historical novel, a Hollywood movie or a British TV series, Lancelot is centre stage. He is usually shown as a romantically flawed hero doomed to eventual disgrace by the same talents and skills that earn him fame in the first place.
  • The Adventures of Sir Lancelot Du Lake

    The Adventures of Sir Lancelot Du Lake

    1 The Adventures of Sir Lancelot du Lake There was held a feast of the Round Table at Caerleon, with high splendour; and all the knights thereof held many games and jousts. And therein Sir Lancelot increased in fame and worship above all men, for he overthrew all comers, and never was unhorsed or worsted, save by treason and enchantment. When Queen Guinevere had seen his wondrous feats, she held him in great favour, and smiled more on him than on any other knight. And Lancelot thought on her as fairest of all ladies, and done his best to win her grace. So the queen often sent for him, and bade him tell of his birth and strange adventures: how he was only son of great King Ban of Brittany, and how, one night, his father, with his mother Helen and himself, fled from his burning castle; how his father, groaning deeply, fell to the ground and died of grief and wounds, and how his mother, running to her husband, left himself alone; how, as he thus lay wailing, came the lady of the lake, and took him in her arms and went with him into the midst of the waters, where, with his cousins Lionel and Bors he had been cherished all his childhood until he came to King Arthur’s court; and how this was the reason why men called him Lancelot du Lake. Anon it was ordained by King Arthur, that in every year at Pentecost there should be held a festival of all the knights of the Round Table at Caerleon, or such other place as he should choose.
  • Writing and Literary Study Spring 2010 the Chivalrous Sir Gawain If

    Writing and Literary Study Spring 2010 the Chivalrous Sir Gawain If

    Ahmed 1 Sarin Taslima Ahmed College Writing II: Writing and Literary Study Spring 2010 The Chivalrous Sir Gawain If a man does not open the door for a woman, she may think chivalry is dead or forget that it ever existed at all. Today's woman is not a damsel in distress, but rather stands on equal ground with her masculine counterpart. She has no need to acknowledge that there was ever a time when men lived and died for the sake of honor. However, around 1066 a.d. to 1485 a.d., that was exactly what European knights, and those around the world, did (Achlin). Of these brave soldiers, the most famous were the Knights of the Round Table, subjects of Camelot and King Arthur. Perhaps the most acclaimed knights are dubbed Sir Lancelot and Sir Gawain. Lancelot is still known as the greatest of all knights, the perfect knight, but based on Gawain's actions in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight by the Pearl Poet and those of Lancelot in The Once and Future King by T.H. White, I've come to the conclusion that Gawain is a greater model of chivalry than Lancelot. Following the code of chivalry, Gawain is faithful to God, his King, and he is respectful to women. Lancelot is very talented, but he does not feel the need to follow the laws of knighthood, and ends up disregarding King Arthur, Queen Guinevere and even God because of it. "Two virtues above all else were held to mark the good knight and bring him honor.
  • The Book of Quests

    The Book of Quests

    THE BOOK OF QUESTS uests are the driving force in the life of every noble Knight. So it should Qbe no surprise to find Quests at the very heart of Shadows over Camelot. While the content of the Rules Booklet should be familiar to every aspiring Knight, the Book of Quests is primarily a reference, written for inquisitive Knights in search of insight, or the scheming Traitor looking for a lethal edge. In the back of this book you will find two appendices. The first, unearthed from , old manuscripts, offers a glimpse of each Knight s personality. The second is a detailed manifest of each card used in the game. In this booklet, page numbers given in reference point to the corresponding entries in the Rules booklet, unless indicated otherwise. nnnnnnnnnn THE QUESTS nnnnnnnnnn There are several “Standard” Quests in Camelot’s immediate vicinity: N The Tournament against the Black Knight N The Quest for Lancelot N The Dragon’s Quest N The Quest for Excalibur N The Quest for the Holy Grail N The Pict and Saxon Wars each with its own entry in the Book of Quests. For each Quest won or lost, new Swords are laid onto the Round Table. As the game progresses, the Swords show which side currently has the advantage. There are also two “Special” Quests within Camelot proper, where a defeat spells immediate doom for the Loyal Knights: • The Siege of Camelot, which is lost if 12 Siege Engines ever surround Camelot; • and The Quest of the Round Table, where the outcome of the game is decided in favor of whichever color Swords have the majority, once 12 or more have been laid down.
  • The Logic of the Grail in Old French and Middle English Arthurian Romance

    The Logic of the Grail in Old French and Middle English Arthurian Romance

    The Logic of the Grail in Old French and Middle English Arthurian Romance Submitted in part fulfilment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Martha Claire Baldon September 2017 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 8 Introducing the Grail Quest ................................................................................................................ 9 The Grail Narratives ......................................................................................................................... 15 Grail Logic ........................................................................................................................................ 30 Medieval Forms of Argumentation .................................................................................................. 35 Literature Review ............................................................................................................................. 44 Narrative Structure and the Grail Texts ............................................................................................ 52 Conceptualising and Interpreting the Grail Quest ............................................................................ 64 Chapter I: Hermeneutic Progression: Sight, Knowledge, and Perception ............................... 78 Introduction .....................................................................................................................................
  • The Use of the Arthurian Legend by the Pre-Raphaelites

    The Use of the Arthurian Legend by the Pre-Raphaelites

    University of Colorado, Boulder CU Scholar University Libraries Digitized Theses 189x-20xx University Libraries Summer 6-1-1905 The seU of the Arthurian Legend Matilda Krebs University of Colorado Boulder Follow this and additional works at: http://scholar.colorado.edu/print_theses Recommended Citation Krebs, Matilda, "The sU e of the Arthurian Legend" (1905). University Libraries Digitized Theses 189x-20xx. 2. http://scholar.colorado.edu/print_theses/2 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by University Libraries at CU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Libraries Digitized Theses 189x-20xx by an authorized administrator of CU Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. University Archives THE USE OF THE ARTHURIAN LEGEND BY THE PRE-RAPHAELITES A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO BY MATILDA KREBS A Candidate for the Degree of Master of Arts BOULDER, COLORADO JUNE, 1905 PREFACE. The following pages are the result of many happy hours spent in the library, in an earnest endeavor to become better acquainted with Truth and Beauty. The author does not pose as a critic for she has little knowledge of literary art either theoretical or practical, and none of pic- torial. Should this self-imposed task prove to be of even the slightest benefit to other students, the pleasure to the writer would be multiplied many fold. M ATILDA KREBS. OUTLINE OF THESIS. I. The Arthuriad. 1. The origin of the Arthuriad. 2. Development of the Arthuriad. 3. Use of the Arthuriad by early writers. 4. Revival of interest in the Arthuriad through Rossetti's “ King Arthur's Tomb.” II.
  • Arthurian Legend

    Arthurian Legend

    Nugent: English 11 Fall What do you know about King Arthur, Camelot and the Knights of the Round Table? Do you know about any Knights? If so, who? If you know anything about King Arthur, why did you learn about King Arthur? If you don’t know anything, what can you guess King Arthur, Camelot, or Knights. A LEGEND is a story told about extraordinary deeds that has been told and retold for generations among a group of people. Legends are thought to have a historical basis, but may also contain elements of magic and myth. MYTH: a story that a particular culture believes to be true, using the supernatural to interpret natural events & to explain the nature of the universe and humanity. An ARCHETYPE is a reoccurring character type, setting, or action that is recognizable across literature and cultures that elicits a certain feeling or reaction from the reader. GOOD EVIL • The Hero • Doppelganger • The Mother The Sage • The Monster • The Scapegoat or sacrificial • The Trickster lamb • Outlaw/destroyer • The Star-crossed lovers • The Rebel • The Orphan • The Tyrant • The Fool • The Hag/Witch/Shaman • The Sadist A ROMANCE is an imaginative story concerned with noble heroes, chivalric codes of honor, passionate love, daring deeds, & supernatural events. Writers of romances tend to idealize their heroes as well as the eras in which the heroes live. Romances typically include these MOTIFS: adventure, quests, wicked adversaries, & magic. Motif: an idea, object, place, or statement that appears frequently throughout a piece of writing, which helps contribute to the work’s overall theme 1.
  • Mordred, a Tragedy

    Mordred, a Tragedy

    MORDRED, A TRAGEDY HENRY NEWBOLT MORDRED, A TRAGEDY Table of Contents MORDRED, A TRAGEDY......................................................................................................................................1 HENRY NEWBOLT.....................................................................................................................................1 ACT I..........................................................................................................................................................................2 SCENE I.........................................................................................................................................................2 SCENE II.......................................................................................................................................................6 ACT II.......................................................................................................................................................................11 SCENE I.......................................................................................................................................................11 SCENE II.....................................................................................................................................................15 SCENE III....................................................................................................................................................18 SCENE IV....................................................................................................................................................22
  • THE STORY of KING ARTHUR and HIS KNIGHTS by Howard Pyle

    THE STORY of KING ARTHUR and HIS KNIGHTS by Howard Pyle

    THE STORY OF KING ARTHUR AND HIS KNIGHTS By Howard Pyle HOW KING ARTHUR HELD A ROYAL WEDDING, AND ESTABLISHED THE ROUND TABLE. AND now was come the early fall of the year; that pleasant season when meadowland and wold were still green with the summer that had only just passed; when the sky, likewise, was as of summertime-extraordinarily blue and full of large floating clouds; when a bird might sing here and another there a short song in memory of springtime (as the smaller fowl doth when the year draweth to its ending); when all the air was tempered with, warmth and yet the leaves were everywhere turning brown and red and gold, so that when the sun shone through them it was as though a cloth of gold, broidered with brown and crimson and green, hung above the head. Now was come the early autumn season of the year, when it is exceedingly pleasant to be afield among the nut-trees with hawk and hound, or to travel abroad in the yellow world, whether it be ahorse or afoot. Such was the time of year in which had been set the marriage of King Arthur and the Lady Guinevere at Camelot, and at that place was extraordinary pomp and glory of circumstance. All the world was astir and in a great ferment of joy, for all folk were exceedingly glad that King Arthur was to have a queen. In preparation for that great occasion the town of Camelot was entirely bedight with magnificence, for the stony street along which the Lady Guinevere must come to the royal castle of the king was strewn thick with fresh-cut rushes, smoothly laid.
  • Katherine Gubbels in the Words of One of My Students, Sir Gareth Is “Kind

    Katherine Gubbels in the Words of One of My Students, Sir Gareth Is “Kind

    THE FAIR (AND QUEER) UNKNOWN IN MALORY’S “THE TALE OF SIR GARETH” Katherine Gubbels In the words of one of my students, Sir Gareth is “kind of a weird knight.” And, after considering Lot’s youngest son and his struggles from kitchen boy to verbal whipping post to impotent lover, I am inclined to agree. After all, while the narrative presents itself as a prototypical “fair unknown” tale, a simple sampling of Gareth scholarship evidences the fact that critics, much like my student, are a bit unsure of what to make of this particular text. Although much of the scholarship focuses on the narrative’s source material, or lack thereof,1 other studies posit readings of Gareth as a manipulator, a product of alchemy theory, a man on a quest for social stability, and a knight hoping to critique and improve the courtesy of Camelot.2 Perhaps some of the confusion arises from seeming contradictions within the piece itself. Indeed, Emily Rebekah Huber points out that Gareth may in fact be read as “flexible.”3 Despite the fact that her study is primarily on Gareth’s nameless dwarf and the part he plays in Gareth’s progression as a knight, her insight nonetheless points to a certain indefinability, inconsistency, or ambiguity on the part 1 On the origins of Le Morte Darthur, see Eugène Vinaver, ed., “Introduction,” in Malory Works, ed. Eugène Vinaver, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), v-x; Edward Donald Kennedy, “Malory’s Use of Hardyng’s Chronicle,” Notes and Queries 214 (1969) 167-70. On the origins of Gareth’s tale, specifically, see P.
  • Concealment and Construction of Knightly Identity in Chretien's Romances and Malory's Le Morte Darthur

    Concealment and Construction of Knightly Identity in Chretien's Romances and Malory's Le Morte Darthur

    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository College of Arts & Sciences Senior Honors Theses College of Arts & Sciences 5-2014 Concealment and construction of knightly identity in Chretien's romances and Malory's Le morte Darthur. Taylor Lee Gathof University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/honors Part of the English Language and Literature Commons, and the European Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation Gathof, Taylor Lee, "Concealment and construction of knightly identity in Chretien's romances and Malory's Le morte Darthur." (2014). College of Arts & Sciences Senior Honors Theses. Paper 88. http://doi.org/10.18297/honors/88 This Senior Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts & Sciences at ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Arts & Sciences Senior Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Concealment and Construction of Knightly Identity in Chretien’s Romances and Malory’s Le Morte Darthur By Taylor Lee Gathof Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Graduation summa cum laude University of Louisville May, 2014 Gathof 2 1. Introduction This paper will discuss the phenomenon of
  • Establishment of the Round Table King Arthur

    Establishment of the Round Table King Arthur

    Establishment Of The Round Table King Arthur Aron usually titrating overpoweringly or stars trickishly when laigh Janus reapplies oftentimes and aurorally. Fundamentalism Wye intravasationsometimes caning throbbing his filibusters coordinately sanguinely or notch and andante, cohering is Augustin so fraudulently! self-trained? Triboluminescent and quietism Rene evangelise her Chretien de troyes form below, loyalty by noble king arthur my last king arthur was midnight a degree of He may have existed. Yvain defeated the seneschal and his brother through trial by combat. Since Chretien had died before ever completing this work, some contemporary and later authors tried to complete his tale or rewrite their own versions of Perceval. Sir Galahad drew near, all armed save his helmet, and stood by the tomb. Analysis, related quotes, timeline. Sir Meliagraunce has borne himself both shamefully and cowardly towards me. The story begins with the miraculous time travel of a regular American back to the time of King Arthur. There was one seat though, at which none could sit. SEC would continue to discourage such awards on the rationale that it would not want to encourage employees whose job it was to prevent corporate legal and ethical violations to profit from simply doing their jobs. Morte and shows Malory at the height of his powers. Had Gawain stayed in Rome, the story implied that Gawain would have succeeded his foster father, and become emperor. Elaine will die for your sake. Arthur took Merlin as his adviser, aide, and soothsayer, and the wizard foretold much that would happen to Arthur. Among the knights who answer his call is Lancelot of the Lake, a French knight who is unrivaled in combat.