DOCSLIB.ORG

Caples Lake and Silver Lake East Campground Improvements Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Caples Lake and Silver Lake East Campground Improvements Project Initial Study/Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration Caples Lake and Silver Lake East Campground Improvements Project Prepared for: El Dorado Irrigation District June 2019 Prepared by: Consulting Engineers and Scientists Initial Study/Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration Caples Lake and Silver Lake East Campground Improvements Project Prepared for: El Dorado Irrigation District 2890 Mosquito Road Placerville, CA 95667 Contact: Doug Venable Environmental Review Analyst (530) 642-4187 Prepared by: GEI Consultants 2868 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 400 Sacramento, CA 95670 Contact: Ryan Jolley Senior Project Manager (916) 912-4942 June 2019 Project No. 1901628 El Dorado Irrigation District NOTICE OF INTENT and NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (Pursuant to CEQA Section 21092 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15072) CAPLES LAKE AND SILVER LAKE EAST CAMPGROUND IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT The El Dorado Irrigation District (EID) proposes to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Section 15000 et seq., Title 14, California Code of Regulations) for the Caples Lake and Silver Lake East Campground Improvements Project (project or proposed project). The project involves improvements to camping units, infrastructure, restrooms, and other facilities to meet the most current U.S. Forest Service (USFS) design and accessibility standards of the Architectural Barriers Act, at the Caples Lake and Silver Lake East campgrounds. The improvements are being conducted in accordance with requirements of USFS Conditions 50.1 and 50.2 of EID’s Federal Energy Regulatory Commission license to operate Project No. 184. The project includes: 1) resurfacing and expanding campground roadways and parking spurs; 2) replacing, expanding, and relocating camping units; 3) replacing the potable water systems; 4) replacing restrooms and other facilities; and 5) abandoning and/or removing existing camping units, pipelines, and other facilities. Project construction is anticipated to take approximately 10 months in fall 2019 and spring/summer 2020. The project site locations are not identified on the lists specified in Government Code section 65962.5 for hazardous waste sites. The project does not increase the capacity or change the existing use of the campgrounds. EID is the lead agency for the project, under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and has directed the preparation of an Initial Study (IS) on the proposed project in accordance with CEQA requirements, the State CEQA Guidelines, and EID’s guidelines. This IS describes the proposed project and assesses the proposed project’s potentially significant adverse impacts on the physical environment. It concludes that the proposed project’s potentially significant or significant adverse effects on the environment could be mitigated to less-than-significant levels; therefore, a proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) has been prepared. Agencies and members of the public are invited to comment on the proposed IS/MND. The comment period is from June 28, 2019 to July 29, 2019. The proposed IS/MND can be reviewed at EID’s Customer Service Building, 2890 Mosquito Road, Placerville, CA 95667 or on the EID web site at www.eid.org/ceqa. Comments can be sent to Doug Venable, EID Environmental Review Analyst, at the address above or by email at [email protected] by 5:00 p.m. on July 29, 2019. A public hearing to consider the IS/MND will be held on August 12, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. during a regularly scheduled meeting of the EID Board of Directors. The hearing will be in the EID Customer Service Building Board Room at the above address. Caples Lake and Silver Lake East Campground Improvements Project GEI Consultants, Inc. El Dorado Irrigation District NOI-1 Notice of Intent In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and California law, it is the policy of the El Dorado Irrigation District to offer its public programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to everyone, including individuals with disabilities. If you are a person with a disability and require information or materials in an appropriate alternative format; or if you require any other accommodation for this meeting, please contact the EID ADA coordinator at 530.642.4045 or email at [email protected] at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. Advance notification within this guideline will enable the District to make reasonable accommodations to ensure accessibility. GEI Consultants, Inc. Caples Lake and Silver Lake East Campground Improvements Project Notice of Intent NOI-2 El Dorado Irrigation District PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Project: Caples Lake and Silver Lake East Campground Improvements Project Lead Agency: El Dorado Irrigation District PROJECT LOCATION The Caples Lake and Silver Lake East campgrounds are located in Alpine and Amador counties, California, respectively. A segment of the new water supply pipeline and offsite well serving the Silver Lake East Campground is located in El Dorado County, California. The project site locations are adjacent to State Route 88, near Caples and Silver lakes. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project involves improvements to camping units, infrastructure, and restrooms, to meet the most current U.S. Forest Service (USFS) design and accessibility standards of the Architectural Barriers Act at the Caples Lake and Silver Lake East campgrounds. The improvements are being conducted in accordance with requirements of USFS Conditions 50.1 and 50.2 of El Dorado Irrigation District’s (EID’s) Federal Energy Regulatory Commission license for operation of Project No. 184. The project includes: 1) resurfacing and expanding campground roadways and parking spurs; 2) replacing, expanding, and relocating camping units; 3) replacing potable water systems; 4) replacing restrooms and other facilities; and 5) abandoning and/or removing existing camping units, pipelines, and other facilities. Project construction is anticipated to take approximately 10 months in fall 2019 and spring/summer 2020. FINDINGS An Initial Study (IS) was prepared to assess the proposed project’s potential effects on the environment and the significance of those effects. Based on the IS, it has been determined that the proposed project would not result in significant adverse effects on the physical environment after implementation of mitigation measures. This conclusion is supported by the following findings: 1. The proposed project would have no impacts on land use and planning, mineral resources, population and housing, public services, and wildfire. 2. The proposed project would have less-than-significant impacts on aesthetics, agriculture and forestry resources, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, recreation, transportation, and utilities and service systems. 3. The proposed project would have potentially significant impacts on biological, Tribal and cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, and hydrology and water quality, but mitigation measures are proposed to avoid or reduce these effects to less-than-significant levels. Caples Lake and Silver Lake East Campground Improvements Project GEI Consultants, Inc. El Dorado Irrigation District MND-1 Mitigated Negative Declaration 4. The proposed project would not have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment; substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species; cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels; threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community; substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of an endangered, rare, or threatened species; or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 5. The proposed project would not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. 6. The proposed project would not have possible environmental effects that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable and contribute to a significant cumulative impact. “Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of an individual project are significant when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. 7. The environmental effects of the proposed project would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Following are the proposed mitigation measures that would be implemented by EID to avoid or minimize environmental impacts. Implementation of these mitigation measures would reduce the environmental impacts of the proposed project to less-than-significant levels. Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Minimize Potential Impacts on Sierra Nevada Yellow-legged Frog EID shall implement the following measures to minimize potential for significant adverse effects on Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog during project activities at the Silver Lake East Campground. Conduct environmental awareness training before project activities begin to inform all construction personnel about measures to avoid and minimize effects on biological resources. Install and maintain high-visibility fencing or other visual marking to protect sensitive biological resource areas (i.e., Oyster Lake and Oyster Creek) that are located adjacent to construction areas from encroachment by personnel and equipment. Incorporate sensitive habitat information into construction
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ralph P. Bieber Photographs of the Overland Trail: Finding Aid
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8fn19jc No online items Ralph P. Bieber Photographs of the Overland Trail: Finding Aid Finding aid prepared by Jane Apostol and Diann Benti. The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens Photo Archives 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2191 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org © 2005 The Huntington Library. All rights reserved. Ralph P. Bieber Photographs of photCL 469 1 the Overland Trail: Finding Aid Overview of the Collection Title: Ralph P. Bieber Photographs of the Overland Trail Dates (inclusive): 1950s-1960s Collection Number: photCL 469 Creator: Bieber, Ralph P. (Ralph Paul), 1894- photographer. Extent: 726 photographs in 13 boxes + 3 pieces of ephemera in 1 envelope. Repository: The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens. Photo Archives 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2191 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org Abstract: The collection contains photographs by historian Ralph P. Bieber (1894-1891) documenting the central overland route to California as it appeared in the 1950s. The images show the route through Missouri, Kansas, Nebraska, Wyoming, Idaho, Utah, Nevada, and California that was used by pioneers and gold seekers beginning in the mid-19th century. Bieber also created categories such as "Donner Party sites," "Gold Discovery Sites," and "Sites associated with John C. Fremont." Language: English. Note: Finding aid last updated on April 8, 2015. Access Open to qualified researchers by prior application through the Reader Services Department. For more information, contact Reader Services. Publication Rights The Huntington Library does not require that researchers request permission to quote from or publish images of this material, nor does it charge fees for such activities.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Southern California
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Southern California Climate and Vegetation Over the Past 125,000 Years from Lake Sequences in the San Bernardino Mountains A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geography by Katherine Colby Glover 2016 © Copyright by Katherine Colby Glover 2016 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Southern California Climate and Vegetation Over the Past 125,000 Years from Lake Sequences in the San Bernardino Mountains by Katherine Colby Glover Doctor of Philosophy in Geography University of California, Los Angeles, 2016 Professor Glen Michael MacDonald, Chair Long sediment records from offshore and terrestrial basins in California show a history of vegetation and climatic change since the last interglacial (130,000 years BP). Vegetation sensitive to temperature and hydroclimatic change tended to be basin-specific, though the expansion of shrubs and herbs universally signalled arid conditions, and landscpe conversion to steppe. Multi-proxy analyses were conducted on two cores from the Big Bear Valley in the San Bernardino Mountains to reconstruct a 125,000-year history for alpine southern California, at the transition between mediterranean alpine forest and Mojave desert. Age control was based upon radiocarbon and luminescence dating. Loss-on-ignition, magnetic susceptibility, grain size, x-ray fluorescence, pollen, biogenic silica, and charcoal analyses showed that the paleoclimate of the San Bernardino Mountains was highly subject to globally pervasive forcing mechanisms that register in northern hemispheric oceans. Primary productivity in Baldwin Lake during most of its ii history showed a strong correlation to historic fluctuations in local summer solar radiation values.
    [Show full text]
  • Sierra Nevada Framework FEIS Chapter 3
    table of contrents Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment – Part 4.6 4.6. Vascular Plants, Bryophytes, and Fungi4.6. Fungi Introduction Part 3.1 of this chapter describes landscape-scale vegetation patterns. Part 3.2 describes the vegetative structure, function, and composition of old forest ecosystems, while Part 3.3 describes hardwood ecosystems and Part 3.4 describes aquatic, riparian, and meadow ecosystems. This part focuses on botanical diversity in the Sierra Nevada, beginning with an overview of botanical resources and then presenting a more detailed analysis of the rarest elements of the flora, the threatened, endangered, and sensitive (TES) plants. The bryophytes (mosses and liverworts), lichens, and fungi of the Sierra have been little studied in comparison to the vascular flora. In the Pacific Northwest, studies of these groups have received increased attention due to the President’s Northwest Forest Plan. New and valuable scientific data is being revealed, some of which may apply to species in the Sierra Nevada. This section presents an overview of the vascular plant flora, followed by summaries of what is generally known about bryophytes, lichens, and fungi in the Sierra Nevada. Environmental Consequences of the alternatives are only analyzed for the Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive plants, which include vascular plants, several bryophytes, and one species of lichen. 4.6.1. Vascular plants4.6.1. plants The diversity of topography, geology, and elevation in the Sierra Nevada combine to create a remarkably diverse flora (see Section 3.1 for an overview of landscape patterns and vegetation dynamics in the Sierra Nevada). More than half of the approximately 5,000 native vascular plant species in California occur in the Sierra Nevada, despite the fact that the range contains less than 20 percent of the state’s land base (Shevock 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • References and Appendices
    References Ainley, D.G., S.G. Allen, and L.B. Spear. 1995. Off- Arnold, R.A. 1983. Ecological studies on six endan- shore occurrence patterns of marbled murrelets gered butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): in central California. In: C.J. Ralph, G.L. Hunt island biogeography, patch dynamics, and the Jr., M.G. Raphael, and J.F. Piatt, technical edi- design of habitat preserves. University of Cali- tors. Ecology and Conservation of the Marbled fornia Publications in Entomology 99: 1–161. Murrelet. USDA Forest Service, General Techni- Atwood, J.L. 1993. California gnatcatchers and coastal cal Report PSW-152; 361–369. sage scrub: the biological basis for endangered Allen, C.R., R.S. Lutz, S. Demairais. 1995. Red im- species listing. In: J.E. Keeley, editor. Interface ported fire ant impacts on Northern Bobwhite between ecology and land development in Cali- populations. Ecological Applications 5: 632-638. fornia. Southern California Academy of Sciences, Allen, E.B., P.E. Padgett, A. Bytnerowicz, and R.A. Los Angeles; 149–169. Minnich. 1999. Nitrogen deposition effects on Atwood, J.L., P. Bloom, D. Murphy, R. Fisher, T. Scott, coastal sage vegetation of southern California. In T. Smith, R. Wills, P. Zedler. 1996. Principles of A. Bytnerowicz, M.J. Arbaugh, and S. Schilling, reserve design and species conservation for the tech. coords. Proceedings of the international sym- southern Orange County NCCP (Draft of Oc- posium on air pollution and climate change effects tober 21, 1996). Unpublished manuscript. on forest ecosystems, February 5–9, 1996, River- Austin, M. 1903. The Land of Little Rain. University side, CA.
    [Show full text]
  • Terr–3 Special-Status Plant Populations
    TERR–3 SPECIAL-STATUS PLANT POPULATIONS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY During 2001 and 2002, the review of existing information, agency consultation, vegetation community mapping, and focused special-status plant surveys were completed. Based on California Native Plant Society’s (CNPS) Electronic Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California (CNPS 2001a), CDFG’s Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB; CDFG 2003), USDA-FS Regional Forester’s List of Sensitive Plant and Animal Species for Region 5 (USDA-FS 1998), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Species List (USFWS 2003), and Sierra National Forest (SNF) Sensitive Plant List (Clines 2002), there were 100 special-status plant species initially identified as potentially occurring within the Study Area. Known occurrences of these species were mapped. Vegetation communities were evaluated to locate areas that could potentially support special-status plant species. Each community was determined to have the potential to support at least one special-status plant species. During the spring and summer of 2002, special-status plant surveys were conducted. For each special-status plant species or population identified, a CNDDB form was completed, and photographs were taken. The locations were mapped and incorporated into a confidential GIS database. Vascular plant species observed during surveys were recorded. No state or federally listed special-status plant species were identified during special- status plant surveys. Seven special-status plant species, totaling 60 populations, were identified during surveys. There were 22 populations of Mono Hot Springs evening-primrose (Camissonia sierrae ssp. alticola) identified. Two populations are located near Mammoth Pool, one at Bear Forebay, and the rest are in the Florence Lake area.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Priority Plant and Animal Species in Oregon Forests
    A GUIDE TO Priority Plant and Animal Species IN OREGON FORESTS A publication of the Oregon Forest Resources Institute Sponsors of the first animal and plant guidebooks included the Oregon Department of Forestry, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Oregon Biodiversity Information Center, Oregon State University and the Oregon State Implementation Committee, Sustainable Forestry Initiative. This update was made possible with help from the Northwest Habitat Institute, the Oregon Biodiversity Information Center, Institute for Natural Resources, Portland State University and Oregon State University. Acknowledgments: The Oregon Forest Resources Institute is grateful to the following contributors: Thomas O’Neil, Kathleen O’Neil, Malcolm Anderson and Jamie McFadden, Northwest Habitat Institute; the Integrated Habitat and Biodiversity Information System (IBIS), supported in part by the Northwest Power and Conservation Council and the Bonneville Power Administration under project #2003-072-00 and ESRI Conservation Program grants; Sue Vrilakas, Oregon Biodiversity Information Center, Institute for Natural Resources; and Dana Sanchez, Oregon State University, Mark Gourley, Starker Forests and Mike Rochelle, Weyerhaeuser Company. Edited by: Fran Cafferata Coe, Cafferata Consulting, LLC. Designed by: Sarah Craig, Word Jones © Copyright 2012 A Guide to Priority Plant and Animal Species in Oregon Forests Oregonians care about forest-dwelling wildlife and plants. This revised and updated publication is designed to assist forest landowners, land managers, students and educators in understanding how forests provide habitat for different wildlife and plant species. Keeping forestland in forestry is a great way to mitigate habitat loss resulting from development, mining and other non-forest uses. Through the use of specific forestry techniques, landowners can maintain, enhance and even create habitat for birds, mammals and amphibians while still managing lands for timber production.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern California Edison
    PROPOSED GENERAL RETAIL STORE PROJECT DRAFT GENERAL BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT LANDERS, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA USGS 7.5’ YUCCA VALLEY NORTH QUADRANGLE TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, SECTION 27 APN 0629-051-62 Prepared for Owner/Applicant: Dynamic Development Company, LLC 1725 21st Street Santa Monica, CA 90404 Office: (310) 315-5411 x 119 Contact: Jon Tanury Project Manager Prepared by: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 3120 Chicago Avenue, Suite 110 Riverside, California 92507 Office: (951) 369-8060 Principal Investigator: John F. Green, Biologist Biologists Who Performed Fieldwork On-Site: John F. Green February 2013 AMEC Project No. 1355400526 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 2.1 Project and Property Description ......................................................................... 1 3.0 METHODS ...................................................................................................................... 2 3.1 Literature Review and Records Search ............................................................... 2 3.2 General Biological Resources Assessment ......................................................... 2 4.0 RESULTS ....................................................................................................................... 3 4.1 Literature Review and
    [Show full text]
  • Hallelujah Junction Wildlife Area Land Management Plan
    Hallelujah Junction Wildlife Area Land Management Plan PREPARED BY SUSTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL INC FOR THE California Department of Fish and Game North Central Region December 2009 SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE rptfic'iii Printed on sustainable paper products COVER: Appleton Utopia Forest Stewardship Council certified by Smartwood (a Rainforest Alliance program), ISO 14001 Registered Environmental Management System, EPA SmartWay Transport Partner Interior pages: Navigator Hybrid 85%-100% recycled post consumer waste blended with virgin fiber, Forest Stewarship Council certified chain of custody, ISO 14001 Registered Environmental Management System, 80% energy from renewable resources Divider pages (main body): Domtar Colors Sustainable Forest Initiative fiber sourcing certified, 30% post consumer waste Divider pages (appendices): Hammermill Fore MP 30% post consumer waste PDF VERSION DESIGNED FOR DUPLEX PRINTING State of California The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME Hallelujah Junction Wildlife Area Land Management Plan Sierra and Lassen Counties, California UPDATED: DECEMBER 2009 PREPARED FOR: California Department of Fish and Game North Central Region Headquarters 1701 Nimbus Road, Suite A Rancho Cordova, California 95670 Attention: Terri Weist 530.644.5980 PREPARED BY: Sustain Environmental Inc. 3104 "O" Street #164 Sacramento, California 95816 916.457.1856 APPRnvFn RY- Hallelujah Junction Wildlife Area Land Management Plan Table of Contents................................................................................................................................................i
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Programmatic EIS for Fuels Reduction and Rangeland
    NATIONAL SYSTEM OF PUBLIC LANDS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. Department of the Interior March 2020 BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Draft Programmatic EIS for Fuels Reduction and Rangeland Restoration in the Great Basin Volume 3: Appendices B through N Estimated Lead Agency Total Costs Associated with Developing and Producing this EIS $2,000,000 The Bureau of Land Management’s multiple-use mission is to sustain the health and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. The Bureau accomplishes this by managing such activities as outdoor recreation, livestock grazing, mineral development, and energy production, and by conserving natural, historical, cultural, and other resources on public lands. Appendix B. Acronyms, Literature Cited, Glossary B.1 ACRONYMS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS Full Phrase ACHP Advisory Council on Historic Preservation AML appropriate management level ARMPA Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment BCR bird conservation region BLM Bureau of Land Management BSU biologically significant unit CEQ Council on Environmental Quality EIS environmental impact statement EPA US Environmental Protection Agency ESA Endangered Species Act ESR emergency stabilization and rehabilitation FIAT Fire and Invasives Assessment Tool FLPMA Federal Land Policy and Management Act FY fiscal year GHMA general habitat management area HMA herd management area IBA important bird area IHMA important habitat management area MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act MOU memorandum of understanding MtCO2e metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NHPA National Historic Preservation Act NIFC National Interagency Fire Center NRCS National Resources Conservation Service NRHP National Register of Historic Places NWCG National Wildfire Coordination Group OHMA other habitat management area OHV off-highway vehicle Programmatic EIS for Fuels Reduction and Rangeland Restoration in the Great Basin B-1 B.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS DDS-43, Status of Rare and Endemic Plants
    JAMES R. SHEVOCK U.S. Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region San Francisco, California 24 Status of Rare and Endemic Plants ABSTRACT The Sierra Nevada represents nearly 20% of the California land base INTRODUCTION yet contains over 50% of the state’s flora. Approximately 405 vascu- For more than 100 years, the flora of the Sierra Nevada has lar plant taxa are endemic to the Sierra Nevada. Of this total, 218 fascinated botanists even beyond the borders of the United taxa are considered rare by conservation organizations and/or state States. Visions of Yosemite, giant sequoias, and extensive and federal agencies. In addition, 168 other rare taxa have at least mixed conifer forests have added to an awareness of this one occurrence in the Sierra Nevada. Five monotypic genera are magnificent mountain range. The Sierra Nevada, part of the endemic to the Sierra Nevada (Bolandra, Carpenteria, Orochaenactis, California Floristic Province, is characterized by high rates of Phalacoseris, and Sequoiadendron). Information on rarity and ende- plant endemism (Stebbins and Major 1965; Raven and Axelrod mism for lichens and bryophytes for the Sierra Nevada is very specu- 1978; Messick 1995). For most of this century, plant collecting lative and fragmentary due to limited fieldwork and the small number and floristic research remained the pursuits of professional of available collections. Two mosses are endemic to the Sierra Ne- botanists with ties to major scientific and educational centers vada. Parameters obtained for each rare and/or endemic taxon in- (Shevock and Taylor 1987). Floristic studies have as one of clude habitat type and distributions by county, river basin, and their primary goals documentation of all the taxa (species, topographic quadrangle.
    [Show full text]
  • April 1999 SCREE
    October, 2007 Peak Climbing Section, Loma Prieta Chapter, Sierra Club Vol. 41 No. 10 World Wide Web Address: http://lomaprieta.sierraclub.org/pcs/ General Meeting Editor’s Notes Date: October 9, 2007 Winter made a brief appearance last week with snow falling in the mountains (see the Highland Peak report). Expect a gorgeous time of the year for outside activity Time: 7:30 pm in the wilderness using skis, snowshoes or just feet. Where: Peninsula Conservation Center This year we introduce a new kind of trip for those who 3921 E. Bayshore Rd. are more ambitious than the would-be tripper that curls Palo Alto, CA up by the fire with a good book. Called the BSS, Backcountry Ski Series, the offering is a day trip into the backcountry once a month, typically in the Tahoe Program: Canyoneering - area. The trips are scheduled for Friday because North Fork of the Kaweah River Thursday night traffic after 7 pm is quick and smooth while Friday is terrible. Also a Friday outing allows the leaders to recover enough to race in the citizen class Presenter: Toinette Hartshorne races each Sunday or Monday. People may attend one or all trips. Tips on Telemark and Randonee skiing will be available, but participants need to have advanced This past summer, Jef Levin and Toinette skiing skills. Typically there will be anywhere from completed the first descent of the North Fork of good to great powder. the Kaweah River. Several weekends were spent scouting and rigging the technical sections in the Avalanche beacons as well as shovels and probes are beautiful granite canyons carved by this river.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Mokelumne Management Unit
    AQUATIC BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UPPER MOKELUMNE MANAGEMENT UNIT 2016 Prepared By Sarah Mussulman Environmental Scientist Mitch Lockhart Environmental Scientist And Kevin Thomas Kimberly Gagnon NORTH CENTRAL REGION DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................... II LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................. III SECTION I .............................................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 1) OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................. 2 2) FACTORS AFFECTING THE SIERRA NEVADA YELLOW-LEGGED FROG ........................... 3 3) REGULATORY STATUS OF THE SIERRA NEVADA YELLOW-LEGGED FROG ................... 4 4) RESOURCE ASSESSMENT METHODS ................................................................................... 5 5) FISHERIES MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES ............................................................................. 6 6) AMPHIBIAN MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES ............................................................................. 7 7) MONITORING ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]