Upper Mokelumne Management Unit

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Upper Mokelumne Management Unit AQUATIC BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UPPER MOKELUMNE MANAGEMENT UNIT 2016 Prepared By Sarah Mussulman Environmental Scientist Mitch Lockhart Environmental Scientist And Kevin Thomas Kimberly Gagnon NORTH CENTRAL REGION DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................... II LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................. III SECTION I .............................................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 1) OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................. 2 2) FACTORS AFFECTING THE SIERRA NEVADA YELLOW-LEGGED FROG ........................... 3 3) REGULATORY STATUS OF THE SIERRA NEVADA YELLOW-LEGGED FROG ................... 4 4) RESOURCE ASSESSMENT METHODS ................................................................................... 5 5) FISHERIES MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES ............................................................................. 6 6) AMPHIBIAN MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES ............................................................................. 7 7) MONITORING ............................................................................................................................. 9 SECTION II ........................................................................................................................... 10 MANAGEMENT SETTING AND RESOURCES .................................................................... 10 1) ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING .................................................................................................. 11 2) HERPETOFAUNA RESOURCES............................................................................................. 12 3) FISHERIES RESOURCES ....................................................................................................... 13 SECTION III .......................................................................................................................... 17 MANAGEMENT DIRECTION ................................................................................................ 17 1) DEADWOOD CANYON PLANNING WATERSHED MANAGEMENT DIRECTION ................ 18 2) FOURTH OF JULY CANYON PLANNING WATERSHED MANAGEMENT DIRECTION ....... 31 3) JELMINI CREEK PLANNING WATERSHED MANAGEMENT DIRECTION ........................... 35 4) LADEUX MEADOW PLANNING WATERSHED MANAGEMENT DIRECTION ...................... 42 5) LOWER DEER CREEK PLANNING WATERSHED MANAGEMENT DIRECTION ................. 50 6) LOWER SUMMIT CREEK PLANNING WATERSHED MANAGEMENT DIRECTION ............. 57 7) MIDDLE COLE CREEK PLANNING WATERSHED MANAGEMENT DIRECTION ................. 62 8) TANGLEFOOT CANYON PLANNING WATERSHED MANAGEMENT DIRECTION .............. 76 9) UPPER COLE CREEK PLANNING WATERSHED MANAGEMENT DIRECTION .................. 81 10) UPPER SUMMIT CREEK PLANNING WATERSHED MANAGEMENT DIRECTION ........... 85 SECTION IV ........................................................................................................................ 104 LITERATURE CITED .......................................................................................................... 104 - 2 - LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1: SUMMARY OF HERPETOFAUNA SURVEY DATA AND MANAGEMENT FOR BULL RUN CREEK PWS. ...... 18 TABLE 2: SUMMARY OF HERPETOFAUNA SURVEY DATA AND MANAGEMENT FOR DEADWOOD CANYON PWS. 23 TABLE 3: SUMMARY OF FISHERIES POPULATION DATA IN DEADWOOD CANYON PWS. .................................. 27 TABLE 4: SUMMARY OF FISHERIES MANAGEMENT FOR DEADWOOD CANYON PWS. ...................................... 27 TABLE 5: SUMMARY OF HERPETOFAUNA SURVEY DATA AND MANAGEMENT FOR FOURTH OF JULY CANYON PWS. ............................................................................................................................................. 31 TABLE 6: SUMMARY OF HERPETOFAUNA SURVEY DATA AND MANAGEMENT FOR HIGHLAND LAKES PWS. ....... 35 TABLE 7: SUMMARY OF FISHERIES POPULATION DATA IN HIGHLAND LAKES PWS. ........................................ 36 TABLE 8: SUMMARY OF FISHERIES MANAGEMENT INFORMATION FOR HIGHLAND LAKES PWS. ...................... 36 TABLE 9: SUMMARY OF HERPETOFAUNA SURVEY DATA AND MANAGEMENT FOR LADEUX MEADOW PWS. ...... 43 TABLE 10: SUMMARY OF FISHERIES POPULATION DATA IN LADEUX MEADOW PWS. ..................................... 45 TABLE 11: SUMMARY OF FISHERIES MANAGEMENT INFORMATION FOR LADEUX MEADOW PWS. ................... 46 TABLE 12: SUMMARY OF HERPETOFAUNA SURVEY DATA AND MANAGEMENT FOR LOWER DEER CREEK PLANNING WATERSHED. .................................................................................................................. 51 TABLE 13: SUMMARY OF FISHERIES POPULATION DATA IN LOWER DEER CREEK PWS. ................................ 56 TABLE 14: SUMMARY OF FISHERIES MANAGEMENT INFORMATION FOR LOWER DEER CREEK PWS................ 56 TABLE 15: SUMMARY OF HERPETOFAUNA SURVEY DATA AND MANAGEMENT FOR LOWER SUMMIT CREEK PWS. ....................................................................................................................................................... 62 TABLE 16: SUMMARY OF FISHERIES POPULATION DATA IN LOWER SUMMIT CREEK PWS. ............................. 67 TABLE 17: SUMMARY OF FISHERIES MANAGEMENT INFORMATION FOR LOWER SUMMIT CREEK PWS. ........... 68 TABLE 18: SUMMARY OF HERPETOFAUNA DATA AND MANAGEMENT FOR MIDDLE COLE CREEK PWS.: .......... 73 TABLE 19: SUMMARY OF FISHERIES POPULATION DATA IN MIDDLE COLE CREEK PWS. ................................ 74 TABLE 20: SUMMARY OF HERPETOFAUNA SURVEY DATA AND MANAGEMENT FOR TANGLEFOOT CANYON PWS. ....................................................................................................................................................... 79 TABLE 21: SUMMARY OF FISHERIES MANAGEMENT INFORMATION FOR TANGLEFOOT CANYON PWS. ............ 80 TABLE 22: SUMMARY OF FISHERIES POPULATION DATA IN TANGLEFOOT CANYON PWS. .............................. 81 TABLE 23: SUMMARY OF HERPETOFAUNA SURVEY DATA AND MANAGEMENT FOR UPPER COLE CREEK PWS. 86 TABLE 24: SUMMARY OF FISHERIES POPULATION DATA IN UPPER COLE CREEK PWS. ................................. 90 TABLE 25: SUMMARY OF FISHERIES MANAGEMENT INFORMATION FOR UPPER COLE CREEK PWS. ............... 90 TABLE 26: SUMMARY OF HERPETOFAUNA SURVEY DATA AND MANAGEMENT FOR UPPER SUMMIT CREEK PWS. ....................................................................................................................................................... 97 TABLE 27: SUMMARY OF FISHERIES POPULATION DATA IN UPPER SUMMIT CREEK PWS............................... 99 TABLE 28 SUMMARY OF FISHERIES MANAGEMENT INFORMATION FOR UPPER SUMMIT CREEK PWS. ........... 100 ii LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1: CDFW PLANNING WATERSHEDS WITHIN UPPER MOKELUMNE MANAGEMENT UNIT. .................... 15 FIGURE 2: USE WITHIN THE UPPER MOKELUMNE MANAGEMENT UNIT. ........................................................ 16 FIGURE 3: HERPETOFAUNA RESOURCES IN BULL RUN CREEK PLANNING WATERSHED. ............................... 19 FIGURE 4: MANAGEMENT DIRECTION IN BULL RUN CREEK PLANNING WATERSHED. ..................................... 20 FIGURE 5: FISHERIES RESOURCES IN BULL RUN CREEK PLANNING WATERSHED. ........................................ 21 FIGURE 6: HERPETOFAUNA SPECIES DISTRIBUTION IN DEADWOOD CANYON PLANNING WATERSHED. ........... 28 FIGURE 7: MANAGEMENT DIRECTION IN DEADWOOD CANYON PLANNING WATERSHED. ................................ 29 FIGURE 8: FISH SPECIES DISTRIBUTION IN DEADWOOD CANYON PLANNING WATERSHED. ............................ 30 FIGURE 9: HERPETOFAUNA SPECIES DISTRIBUTION IN FOURTH OF JULY CANYON PLANNING WATERSHED. ... 32 FIGURE 10: MANAGEMENT DIRECTION IN FOURTH OF JULY CANYON PLANNING WATERSHED. ...................... 33 FIGURE 11: FISH SPECIES DISTRIBUTION IN FOURTH OF JULY CANYON PLANNING WATERSHED. ................... 34 FIGURE 12: SUMMARY OF HERPETOFAUNA RESOURCES IN HIGHLAND LAKES PLANNING WATERSHED. .......... 37 FIGURE 13: MANAGEMENT DIRECTION IN HIGHLAND LAKES PLANNING WATERSHED. ................................... 38 FIGURE 14: FISHERIES RESOURCES IN HIGHLAND LAKES PLANNING WATERSHED........................................ 39 FIGURE 15: LAKE AND STREAM DISTRIBUTION IN JELMINI CREEK PLANNING WATERSHED. ............................ 41 FIGURE 16: HERPETOFAUNA SPECIES DISTRIBUTION IN LADEUX MEADOW PLANNING WATERSHED. .............. 47 FIGURE 17: MANAGEMENT DIRECTION IN LADEUX MEADOW PLANNING WATERSHED. ................................... 48 FIGURE 18: FISH SPECIES DISTRIBUTION IN LADEUX MEADOW PLANNING WATERSHED. ............................... 49 FIGURE 19: HERPETOFAUNA SPECIES DISTRIBUTION IN LOWER DEER CREEK PLANNING WATERSHED. ......... 57 FIGURE 20: MANAGEMENT DIRECTION IN LOWER DEER CREEK PLANNING WATERSHED. .............................. 58 FIGURE 21: FISH SPECIES DISTRIBUTION IN LOWER DEER CREEK PLANNING WATERSHED. .......................... 59 FIGURE 22: HERPETOFAUNA SPECIES DISTRIBUTION IN LOWER SUMMIT CREEK PLANNING WATERSHED. ..... 69 FIGURE 23: MANAGEMENT DIRECTION IN LOWER SUMMIT CREEK PLANNING WATERSHED. .......................... 70 FIGURE 24: FISH SPECIES DISTRIBUTION
Recommended publications
  • Field Assessment of Whitebark Pine in the Sierra Nevada
    FIELD ASSESSMENT OF WHITEBARK PINE IN THE SIERRA NEVADA Sara Taylor, Daniel Hastings, and Julie Evens Purpose of field work: 1. Verify distribution of whitebark pine in its southern extent (pure and mixed stands) 2. Assess the health and status of whitebark pine 3. Ground truth polygons designated by CALVEG as whitebark pine Regional Dominant 4. Conduct rapid assessment or reconnaissance surveys California National Forest Overview Areas surveyed: July 2013 Sequoia National Forest Areas surveyed: August 2013 Eldorado National Forest Areas surveyed: September 2013 Stanislaus National Forest Field Protocol and Forms: • Modified CNPS/CDFW Vegetation Rapid Assessment protocol Additions to CNPS/CDFW Rapid Assessment protocol: CNDDB • Individuals/stand • Phenology • Overall viability (health/status) Marc Meyer • Level of beetle attack • % absolute dead cover • % of whitebark cones CNPS • Impacts and % mortality from rust and beetle Field Protocol and Forms: • CNPS/CDFW Field Reconnaissance (recon) protocol is a simplified Rapid Assessment (RA) protocol 3 reasons to conduct a recon: 1. WBP stand is largely diseased/infested 2. CALVEG polygon was incorrect 3. WBP stand was close to other RA Results: Sequoia National Forest • Whitebark pine was not found during survey in Golden Trout Wilderness • Calveg polygons assessed (36 total) were mostly foxtail pine (Pinus balfouriana) • Highest survey conducted was at 11,129 ft at the SEKI and NF border Results: Eldorado National Forest (N to S) Desolation Wilderness: • 3 rapid assessments and 8 recons were conducted • 9,061 to 9,225 ft in elevation • Lower elevation stands were more impacted from MPB Mokelumne Wilderness: • 5 rapid assessments and 10 recons were conducted • 8,673 to 9,566 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Emigrant Lake
    26 • Sierra Nevada EMIGRANT LAKE 3 Length: 9 miles round-trip Hiking time: 5 hours or overnight High point: 8,600 feet Total elevation gain: 950 feet Difficulty: easy Season: mid-July through late October Water: available from Caples Lake and Emigrant Lake (purify first) Maps: USGS 7.5’ Caples Lake, USFS Mokelumne Wilderness Information: Amador Ranger District, Eldorado National Forest One-way 8600' 8500' tower high above. Day hikers do not need permits. 8400' Overnight hikers need to contact the Amador 8300' Ranger Station for more information on obtaining 8200' 8100' a permit (209-295-4251; www.fs.fed.us/r5/eldorado; 8000' during the summer season you can also call the 7900' 7800' Carson Pass Information Station, 209-258-8606.) 0 mile 2.25 4.5 No fires are allowed, so bring your backpacking ThisHike 3. Emigr trailant Lakofferse an easy day hike or overnight trip stove. Groups are limited to a maximum size of that’s suitable for all. You’ll travel through small, twelve for day hikes and eight for overnight trips. flower-filled meadows and a mixed pine/fir forest The trailhead parking area, signed for Caples to deep Emigrant Lake, where mountain peaks Lake, is on the south side of Highway 88 by the To Carson Pass Caples Lake Emigrant Lake Mokelumne Wilderness P Covered Wagon To Sacramento Peak 0 1 88 MILES Thimble Peak Emigrant Lake • 27 Caples Lake Dam, which is 4.9 miles west of Car- A rock hop across Emigrant Lake’s outlet son Pass (parking fee). stream awaits at 4 miles, after which you’ll have The signed trail begins near the bathrooms occasional eastward views through the trees of and, after passing a few quaking aspen, contours The Sisters’ rocky spires as the climb continues.
    [Show full text]
  • Practices for Wilderness and Backcountry David N
    United States Department of Agriculture Low-Impact Recreational Forest Service Intermountain Practices for Wilderness Research Station General Technical and Backcountry Report INT-265 August 1989 David N. Cole THE AUTHOR There are three primary ways of accessing information on specific practices. Someone interested in all of the practices DAVID N. COLE is research biologist and Project Leader for useful in avoiding specific problems can use the lists follow- the Intermountain Station’s Wilderness Management Re- ing the discussions of each management problem. Major search Work Unit at the Forestry Sciences Laboratory, categories of practices, such as all those that pertain to the Missoula. Dr. Cole received his B.A. degree in geography use of campfires, can be located in the table of contents. from the University of California, Berkeley, in 1972. He Specific practices are listed in appendix A. received his Ph.D., also in geography, from the University of Oregon in 1977. He has written many papers on wilderness CONTENTS management, particularly the ecological effects of recrea- tional use. Introduction ..........................................................................l Education-A Personal Perspective ................................... .2 PREFACE Management Problems.. ......................................................3 Trail Problems ................................................................. 3 This report summarizes information on low-impact recrea- Campsite Problems .........................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • USGS DDS-43, Non-Native Trout
    ROLAND A. KNAPP Sierra Nevada Aquatic University of California Mammoth Lakes, California and Marine Science Institute University of California 8 Santa Barbara, California Non-Native Trout in Natural Lakes of the Sierra Nevada: An Analysis of Their Distribution and Impacts on Native Aquatic Biota Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final report to Congress, vol. III, Assessments and scientific basis for management options. Davis: University of California, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, 1996. This report was funded in part by the Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project (SNEP). Under the agreement with SNEP, I agreed to conduct a literature review of the distribution of non-native trout in the Sierra Nevada, and their impacts on native aquatic biota. Because existing literature did not allow an adequate analysis of the current trout distribution, I have included results based on a compilation of data from the California Department of Fish and Game and the National Park Service. The geographic information system (GIS) data compilation effort was funded by the U.S.D.A. Pacific Southwest Research Station. ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to describe the current distribution of introduced trout in the Sierra Nevada relative to the historic fish distribution, and to review the impacts of introduced trout on native aquatic biota. Historically, trout were absent above approximately 1800 m in the Sierra Nevada. In the mid-1800's, however, widespread trout introductions were begun to move fish into formerly fishless lakes and streams to enhance recreational fishing. Trout stocking is now conducted by the California Department of Fish and Game, and the current program is intended to supplement and maintain existing populations of non-native trout.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 98-425 An
    PUBLIC LAW 98-425-SEPT. 28, 1984 98 STAT. 1619 Public Law 98-425 98th Congress An Act Sept. 28, 1984 Entitled the "California Wilderness Act of 1984". [H.R. 1437] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That this title may California Wilderness Act be cited as the "California Wilderness Act of 1984". of 1984. National TITLE I Wilderness Preservation System. DESIGNATION OF WILDERNESS National Forest System. SEC. 101. (a) In furtherance of the purposes of the Wilderness Act, National parks, the following lands, as generally depicted on maps, appropriately monuments, etc. referenced, dated July 1980 (except as otherwise dated) are hereby 16 USC 1131 designated as wilderness, and therefore, as components of the Na­ note. tional Wilderness Preservation System- (1)scertain lands in the Lassen National Forest, California,s which comprise approximately one thousand eight hundred acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled "Caribou Wilder­ ness Additions-Proposed", and which are hereby incorporated in, and which shall be deemed to be a part of the Caribou Wilderness as designated by Public Law 88-577; 16 USC 1131 (2)s certain lands in the Stanislaus and Toiyabe Nationals note. 16 USC 1132 Forests, California, which comprise approximately one hundred note. sixty thousand acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled "Carson-Iceberg Wilderness-Proposed", dated July 1984, and which shall be known as the Carson-Iceberg Wilderness: Pro­ vided, however, That the designation of the Carson-Iceberg Wil­ derness shall not preclude continued motorized access to those previously existing facilities which are directly related to per­ mitted livestock grazing activities in the Wolf Creek Drainage on the Toiyabe National Forest in the same manner and degree in which such access was occurring as of the date of enactment of this title; (3)scertain lands in the Shasta-Trinity National Forest, Cali­ 16 USC 1132 fornia, which comprise approximately seven thousand three note.
    [Show full text]
  • April 1999 SCREE
    October, 2007 Peak Climbing Section, Loma Prieta Chapter, Sierra Club Vol. 41 No. 10 World Wide Web Address: http://lomaprieta.sierraclub.org/pcs/ General Meeting Editor’s Notes Date: October 9, 2007 Winter made a brief appearance last week with snow falling in the mountains (see the Highland Peak report). Expect a gorgeous time of the year for outside activity Time: 7:30 pm in the wilderness using skis, snowshoes or just feet. Where: Peninsula Conservation Center This year we introduce a new kind of trip for those who 3921 E. Bayshore Rd. are more ambitious than the would-be tripper that curls Palo Alto, CA up by the fire with a good book. Called the BSS, Backcountry Ski Series, the offering is a day trip into the backcountry once a month, typically in the Tahoe Program: Canyoneering - area. The trips are scheduled for Friday because North Fork of the Kaweah River Thursday night traffic after 7 pm is quick and smooth while Friday is terrible. Also a Friday outing allows the leaders to recover enough to race in the citizen class Presenter: Toinette Hartshorne races each Sunday or Monday. People may attend one or all trips. Tips on Telemark and Randonee skiing will be available, but participants need to have advanced This past summer, Jef Levin and Toinette skiing skills. Typically there will be anywhere from completed the first descent of the North Fork of good to great powder. the Kaweah River. Several weekends were spent scouting and rigging the technical sections in the Avalanche beacons as well as shovels and probes are beautiful granite canyons carved by this river.
    [Show full text]
  • FY21 Authorized and Funded LRF Deferred Maintenance Projects
    FY21 Authorized and Funded LRF Deferred Maintenance Projects Forest or Region State Cong. District Asset Type Project Description Grassland Project Name This project proposes improvements along the Westfork Bike Trail, including the addition of West Fork San Gabriel Accessible Recreation Site, ABA/ADA compliant fishing platforms, minor road maintenance (designated as National Scenic R05 Angeles CA CA-27 Fishing Opportunities Trail, Road Bikeway), striping of picnic area/overflow parking, and signs. An existing agreement with the National Forest Foundation will provide a match. Other partners have submitted grant proposals. This project will complete unfunded items, including the replacement of picnic tables, fencing Recreation Site, R05 Cleveland Renovate Laguna Campground CA CA-50 entrance gates, signage, and infrastructure. The campground renovation project is substantially Trail funded by external agreement. The project is within USDA designated Laguna Recreation Area, This project will enhance equestrian access by improving of traffic flow/control and improving ADA parking to complete campground renovation project including restroom restoration and Recreation Site, decommissioning of old camp spurs, partially funded by external agreements. The Pacific Crest R05 Cleveland Renovate Boulder Oaks Campground CA CA-51 Trail Trail runs through this campground and is a key location for hikers to camp. It is the only equestrian campground located on section A of Pacific Crest Trail. This project is key for threatened and endangered species habitat and cultural site management. This project will repave the access road, conduct site improvements, replace barriers, replace fire Recreation Site, R05 Cleveland Renovate El Cariso Campground CA CA-42 rings and tables, and replace trash receptacles.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Frog Lake, Winnemucca Lake, Round Top Lake, and Fourth of July
    State of California California Department of Fish and Wildlife North Central Region Frog Lake, Winnemucca Lake, Round Top Lake, and Fourth of July Lake, Alpine County 2018 and 2019 Angler Survey Box Analysis Frog Lake Round Top Lake Winnemucca Lake Fourth of July Lake Ben Ewing District Fisheries Biologist: Alpine, Amador, Calaveras, and Lake Counties May 2020 1 Introduction Environmental Setting The Carson Pass Trail incorporates Frog, Winnemucca, Round Top, and Fourth of July Lakes in the Mokelumne Wilderness of the Sierra Nevada mountain range in Alpine County (Lockhart and Mussulman 2016). Three different watersheds are represented between the four lakes. Frog Lake is within the Carson River watershed. Winnemucca and Round Top Lakes are within the South Fork American River watershed, while Fourth of July Lake is within the Mokelumne River watershed. Much of the land surrounding the lakes on the Carson Pass trail is of montane and alpine habitat. Eldorado National Forest (ENF) manages the land in the Carson Pass trail area (Lockhart and Mussulman 2016; Chellman 2018). Due to the popularity of the Carson Pass Trail, ENF has placed restrictions on the Carson Pass Management Area to ensure opportunities for solitude, a primitive recreational experience, and to protect popular camping destinations from overcrowding and heavy impacts (ENF Website). The Carson Pass Trailhead is accessed off Highway 88 at the top of the Carson Pass. Frog Lake Frog Lake is a six-acre lake in Alpine County located at 38° 41’ 16.06 N 119° 59’ 10.03 W situated at 8,865 feet above mean sea level (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Mokelumne Wilderness: a Profile Eldorado/Stanislaus/Toiyabe National Forests ROG 16-34; 06/12
    Mokelumne Wilderness: A Profile Eldorado/Stanislaus/Toiyabe National Forests ROG 16-34; 06/12 The information provided herein was based upon In the Carson Pass Management Area, campfires the Mokelumne Wilderness ROG generated are prohibited by special order of the Eldorado through the efforts of the staff on the Eldorado National Forest. Use of camp stoves is permissible. National Forest. We have taken license to This area includes Frog Lake, Winnemucca Lake, re-format it ever so slightly so that it fits our Round Top Lake, Fourth of July Lake and Emigrant content profile. Our thanks to our partner National Lake. Restrictions indicated are intended to reduce Forest for sharing info. human-caused fires, impacts to vegetation from firewood collection and scarring of rocks and other General Characteristics negative visual impacts associated with the In the Mokelumne Wilderness, there are over establishment of fire rings. 100 miles of hiking trails which will take you from Camping is prohibited within 100 feet of any deep canyons to mountain peaks in excess of ten stream, trail or high-water mark of a lake or thousand feet. Three National Forests (Eldorado, reservoir. Visitors are required to bury human Stanislaus and Toiyabe) share the administration waste at least 100 feet away from water, trails or of the 105,165 acres of Wilderness available to campsites and at a depth of at least six to eight visitors for day-hiking or overnight backpacking. inches. Toilet paper must be buried or packed out. Use is open to hikers and pack stock. Stock must be held or confined to more than 100 No mechanized equipment is allowed—this would feet from campsites and 200 feet from any water include bicycles, hang gliders, over-snow vehicles, resources.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 El Dorado Irrigation District Temporary Water Transfer
    PUBLIC DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 2020 El Dorado Irrigation District Temporary Water Transfer MARCH 2020 PREPARED FOR: El Dorado Irrigation District 2890 Mosquito Road Placerville, CA, 956670 NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 2020 EL DORADO IRRIGATION DISTRICT TEMPORARY WATER TRANSFER The El Dorado Irrigation District (EID) proposes to adopt a Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Section 15000 et seq., Title 14, California Code of Regulations) for the 2020 EID Temporary Water Transfer Project (proposed project). EID plans to transfer up to 8,000 acre-feet (AF) of water to state and/or federal water contractors (Buyers) to be used by the Buyers in their service areas south of the Delta in 2020. EID proposes to transfer water to the Buyers during summer and fall 2020. EID would make the water available through re-operations of three EID reservoirs to release water otherwise planned to be consumed by EID customers and/or stored within the EID network of reservoirs. The involved reservoirs and rivers/creeks would all operate consistent with their historic flow and release schedules, and would meet all applicable rules and requirements, including but not limited to lake level and minimum streamflow requirements. The proposed 8,000-AF transfer quantity would consist of releases from Weber Reservoir (up to 850 AF) that would otherwise remain in Weber Reservoir and releases from Caples/Silver lakes (up to 8,000 AF) that would otherwise be added to storage in Jenkinson Lake or used directly to meet summer/fall 2020 demands that would instead be met with water previously stored in Jenkinson Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Ranger Internship
    WILDERNESS RANGER INTERNSHIP Stanislaus National Forest SUMMER 2015 California Are you interested in a career in natural resource management? Do you love to hike, work hard outside, and enjoy the beauty and challenge of the mountains? Stanislaus National Forest is seeking wilderness ranger interns to help protect and preserve three spectacular Wilderness areas in the Sierra Nevada Mountains of California. Come spend the summer working in the Emigrant, Carson-Iceberg, and Mokelumne Wildernesses. As stewards for wilderness, you will work hard, hike far, climb high, and grow strong! "Climb the mountains and get their good tidings. Nature's peace will flow into you as sunshine flows into trees. The winds will blow their own freshness into you, and the storms their energy, while cares will drop off like autumn leaves." -John Muir Position Summary The wilderness ranger intern is an integral member of the Stanislaus National Forest Wilderness Crew, taking on most of the duties of a full-time wilderness ranger. The ranger intern will work as part of a team with other wilderness rangers, forest staff, and volunteers to support wilderness management objectives. Read on to build career skills while working in spectacular mountain wilderness! "It is not enough to understand the natural world. The point is to defend and preserve it." -Edward Abbey Location The Stanislaus National Forest is located in the central Sierra Nevada Mountains of California. The Sierra, Jon Muir's "Range of Light," stretches for over 400 miles across the state and is internationally renowned for its granite peaks, glacial basins, high alpine lakes, mild summer, and amazing beauty.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Topographic Maps of California
    USGS Topographic Maps of California: 7.5' (1:24,000) Planimetric Planimetric Map Name Reference Regular Replace Ref Replace Reg County Orthophotoquad DRG Digital Stock No Paper Overlay Aberdeen 1985, 1994 1985 (3), 1994 (3) Fresno, Inyo 1994 TCA3252 Academy 1947, 1964 (pp), 1964, 1947, 1964 (3) 1964 1964 c.1, 2, 3 Fresno 1964 TCA0002 1978 Ackerson Mountain 1990, 1992 1992 (2) Mariposa, Tuolumne 1992 TCA3473 Acolita 1953, 1992, 1998 1953 (3), 1992 (2) Imperial 1992 TCA0004 Acorn Hollow 1985 Tehama 1985 TCA3327 Acton 1959, 1974 (pp), 1974 1959 (3), 1974 (2), 1994 1974 1994 c.2 Los Angeles 1994 TCA0006 (2), 1994, 1995 (2) Adelaida 1948 (pp), 1948, 1978 1948 (3), 1978 1948, 1978 1948 (pp) c.1 San Luis Obispo 1978 TCA0009 (pp), 1978 Adelanto 1956, 1968 (pp), 1968, 1956 (3), 1968 (3), 1980 1968, 1980 San Bernardino 1993 TCA0010 1980 (pp), 1980 (2), (2) 1993 Adin 1990 Lassen, Modoc 1990 TCA3474 Adin Pass 1990, 1993 1993 (2) Modoc 1993 TCA3475 Adobe Mountain 1955, 1968 (pp), 1968 1955 (3), 1968 (2), 1992 1968 Los Angeles, San 1968 TCA0012 Bernardino Aetna Springs 1958 (pp), 1958, 1981 1958 (3), 1981 (2) 1958, 1981 1981 (pp) c.1 Lake, Napa 1992 TCA0013 (pp), 1981, 1992, 1998 Agua Caliente Springs 1959 (pp), 1959, 1997 1959 (2) 1959 San Diego 1959 TCA0014 Agua Dulce 1960 (pp), 1960, 1974, 1960 (3), 1974 (3), 1994 1960 Los Angeles 1994 TCA0015 1988, 1994, 1995 (3) Aguanga 1954, 1971 (pp), 1971, 1954 (2), 1971 (3), 1982 1971 1954 c.2 Riverside, San Diego 1988 TCA0016 1982, 1988, 1997 (3), 1988 Ah Pah Ridge 1983, 1997 1983 Del Norte, Humboldt 1983
    [Show full text]