The Early History of the Delian League

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Early History of the Delian League The Classical Review http://journals.cambridge.org/CAR Additional services for The Classical Review: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here The Early History of the Delian League Evelyn Abbott The Classical Review / Volume 3 / Issue 09 / November 1889, pp 387 - 390 DOI: 10.1017/S0009840X00195885, Published online: 27 October 2009 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0009840X00195885 How to cite this article: Evelyn Abbott (1889). The Early History of the Delian League. The Classical Review, 3, pp 387-390 doi:10.1017/S0009840X00195885 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/CAR, IP address: 139.80.123.36 on 14 Mar 2015 The Classical Review NOVEMBER 1889. THE EARLY HISTORY OF THE DELIAN LEAGUE. THE latest German writers on Greek whom Diodorus followed, Ephorus of Cyme, History, with some exceptions, seem to and the statement is ' in direct contradiction' accept, either in the whole or in part, the to Herodotus. account of the growth of the Delian league There is no 'direct contradiction,' for given by Kirchhoff in Hermes vol. xi. p. 1 fE. Herodotus is absolutely silent about the As I find myself quite unable to follow Aeolians of the mainland. Kirchhoff himself them, I venture to review the conclusions admits that the possessions of Lesbos on the at which Kirchhoff arrives. mainland would probably follow the lead of They are mainly these : Lesbos; and if so, why should the other 1. That the Aeolians and Ionians of the cities hold back ? There is no certain proof mainland of Asia Minor did not join the that the Aeolians of the coast did not come Delian league till after the battle of Eury- into the alliance at this time, no good reason medon (465 B.C.). why they should not, and a slight presump- 2. That the Hellespontian allies mentioned tion that they did. by Thucydides (i. 89) were not really members b. The case of the Ionians of the main- of the Hellenic alliance. land is different. Kirchhoff grounds his 3. That the cities of the Delian league opinion on the fact that in his flight from were distributed into districts from the Greece Themistocles could land at Ephesus. first. This in his judgment would have been im- 4. That the first <f>6pos could not havepossible if Ephesus had been an allied town amounted to 460 talents, as Thucydides at the time. He has no positive proof stronger than this against the admission of 5. That after his first recall to Sparta the Ionian cities of the coast into the alliance Pausanias became ruler of Byzantium; that before Eurymedon. Sestos was reconquered by the Persians; In answer we may observe : (1) that the and that both cities were finally won for the proof only touches one city, and that the Greeks by Cimon. most Asiatic of Greek cities, the port at Let us examine the evidence on which which the great inland route from Susa these conclusions rest. struck the sea; (2) that the allies were busy 1. a. As to the Aeolians. It is of course at Naxos when Themistocles landed. On stated by Herodotus (ix. 106) that the the other hand it is quite clear from the Lesbians were received into the alliance language of Herodotus and Thucydides that immediately after the battle of Mycale. ' Ionia' really did come into the alliance at Diodorus goes further and asserts that the the time: OVTU> 8r] TO Sevrepov 'IUIVLTJ airo Hepcriuiv ' Aeolians,' meaning no doubt the cities of aireo-Tr) says the first, and in the second we the mainland, were admitted at that time read, 01 Se 'A6rjv<uoi KCU ol air 'Iwvias icai (xi. 37, TOVIS fikv *Io)vas (cai TOVS AIOACIS (rvfx.- IMXOVS broirjfTavTo). This, says Kirchhoff, fi wo/ietVavres %7J<TTOV eirokiopKow. is only the' local-patriotismus' of the author, Kirchhoff endeavours to avoid this contra- NO. XXVIII. VOL. III. c c 388 THE CLASSICAL REVIEW. diction by assuming that ' Ionia ' here means inscriptions after 442) with Ionia, not in the no more than the islands of the coast—in island district. This arrangement, says which sense he speaks of an ' Ionian dis- Kirchhoff, can only be explained by the trict.' But this is not the common meaning supposition that Nisyrus came over very early, of ' Ionia' and Ionians'; and the account at the same time as Samos, Chios etc., which, which Herodotus gives of the proceedings as he assumes, at the first formed the Ionian after Mycale makes the assumption very district. But such an argument requires improbable. As is well known the ques- that Euboea, Naxos, and Delos, which were tion was then raised whether the Greeks members of the Hellenic confederacy before should undertake to protect the Ionians the Athenians formed a separate confederacy in their colonies, or transfer them to at all, should be classed with Samos and the ports of the Medizing cities in the Chios. As a matter of fact they are not, peninsula of Greece. The Spartans wished but they formed part of the island district, to transfer them, but the Athenians under- and therefore, so far as chronology goes, Nisy- took their defence and carried the day. rus could have been placed in either group. Are we to suppose that in this discussion it Again, Lemnos and Imbros are put among is only the islanders who are meant; only the islands, not in the Hellespontian district, those who were cut off from Asia by sea, at because, says Kirchhoff, the island district a time when Xerxes had hardly a ship in the was formed before the Hellespontian. This Aegean ? The cities most in need of pro- view of course assumes that the Hellespontians tection were Miletus and other cities of the were not allies from the first. Yet, as we coast which were exposed to the vengeance have seen, the Hellespontians were received of the King. immediately after Mycale, and it is difficult 2. Thucydides very plainly tells us (I. c.) to conceive, impossible to prove, that Lemnos that the Athenians were aided in besieging and Imbros were received earlier. The Sestos by the allies from the Hellespont. Hellespontians were certainly allies before Kirchhoff asserts that these could not be the Athenians formed a separate league. We members of the Hellenic alliance because, may also observe that Delos and Samos came after the departure of the Peloponnesians, into the alliance within a month of each other: the Athenians had no power to receive them. both are Ionian islands, yet each is in a For this assertion he has no authority. different district. The classification into The language of Thucydides (inro/xeiWvTcs) districts then seems to have nothing to do implies (rather than not) that the Helles- with the date of the accession of the cities pontians were allies before the departure of included in them. As a matter of fact we the Spartans; and, if this were not the case, do not find these districts established till the Athenians, when they had carried the 442 B.C. What principles prevailed in the day about the admission of the Ionians, were classification we are unable to say. probably in a position to admit new members, 4. Thucydides tells us that the first tribute or thought that they were. (The synod at was 460talents,and laterwriters associate this the Isthmus had ceased to act; the idea assessment with the name of Aristides who, that their consent was necessary to the en- as we also learn from Thucydides, did fix a rolment of allies is preposterous.) Besides scale of tribute. (Thucydides does not pre- in the account of Herodotus, at any rate, cisely say that Aristides fixed the tribute at Leotychidas sails as far north as the Hel- 460 talents, but that Aristides fixed a scale lespont, though he takes no part in the siege of tribute, and that the first tribute was of Sestos. assessed at 460 talents; later writers say 3. The attempt to prove that the Delian definitely that the tribute was fixed by league was divided into districts from the Aristides at 460 talents, and this on the face first has been dealt with by Beloch in of it is what Thucydides means, though Rheinisches Museum, xliii. p. 104 ff. Kirchhoff denies it, and attempts to show Kirchhoff is in reality reduced to this posi- that the text of Thucydides is faulty.) tion : he assumes that an Ionian, an island, Kirehhoff asserts that such a sum is far in ex- and a Hellespontian district were formed at cess of any tribute paid before Eurymedon ; a very early time in the League, not even if we allow that all the cities which simultaneously but in rapid succession; and paid in the Peloponnesian war (i.e. in the that the Ionian district, though distinct from island, Hellespontian, Ionian, exclusive of the island district, was entirely composed of the cities in the mainland, and Thraeian islands. For proof he relies on these facts : districts) paid from the first, and take the the little island of Nisyrus near Rhodes, which highest payments recorded in the inscriptions has nothing to do with Ionia, is classed (in between 454 and 425 B.C., we do not get such a THE CLASSICAL REVIEW. 389 sum. The largest amount which can have he remained for some years and meanwhile been collected from the states included in even Sestos fell back into Persian hands. Kirchhoff's list before Eurymedon is 354 Then Cimon succeeded in reconquering both. talents ; later accessions brought it up to 512 This account is at variance with Thucydides, talents, as assessed.
Recommended publications
  • Ancient History Sourcebook: 11Th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA an Ancient City in Greece, the Capital of Laconia and the Most Powerful State of the Peloponnese
    Ancient History Sourcebook: 11th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA AN ancient city in Greece, the capital of Laconia and the most powerful state of the Peloponnese. The city lay at the northern end of the central Laconian plain, on the right bank of the river Eurotas, a little south of the point where it is joined by its largest tributary, the Oenus (mount Kelefina). The site is admirably fitted by nature to guard the only routes by which an army can penetrate Laconia from the land side, the Oenus and Eurotas valleys leading from Arcadia, its northern neighbour, and the Langada Pass over Mt Taygetus connecting Laconia and Messenia. At the same time its distance from the sea-Sparta is 27 m. from its seaport, Gythium, made it invulnerable to a maritime attack. I.-HISTORY Prehistoric Period.-Tradition relates that Sparta was founded by Lacedaemon, son of Zeus and Taygete, who called the city after the name of his wife, the daughter of Eurotas. But Amyclae and Therapne (Therapnae) seem to have been in early times of greater importance than Sparta, the former a Minyan foundation a few miles to the south of Sparta, the latter probably the Achaean capital of Laconia and the seat of Menelaus, Agamemnon's younger brother. Eighty years after the Trojan War, according to the traditional chronology, the Dorian migration took place. A band of Dorians united with a body of Aetolians to cross the Corinthian Gulf and invade the Peloponnese from the northwest. The Aetolians settled in Elis, the Dorians pushed up to the headwaters of the Alpheus, where they divided into two forces, one of which under Cresphontes invaded and later subdued Messenia, while the other, led by Aristodemus or, according to another version, by his twin sons Eurysthenes and Procles, made its way down the Eurotas were new settlements were formed and gained Sparta, which became the Dorian capital of Laconia.
    [Show full text]
  • Iver Nestos. According to Greek Mythology, the Foundation of the City
    (Avdira). A city in Thrace (northern Greece); situated on Cape ra (a corruption of the medieval Polystylon), eleven miles northeast of iver Nestos.According to Greek mythology, the foundation of the city went to Heracles,whose eighth labor was the capture of the man-eatinghorses iomedes,king of the neighboringBistonians. However, the first attempt to Abdera, accordingto Herodotus,was made in the seventhcentury nc by ists from Clazomenae(Klazumen) in Ionia led by Tynisias,but they were n backby the Thracians.In 545nc the peopleof anotherIonian city, Teos rk), frnding Persiandomination intolerable,placed settlers on the site (in- ing the poet Anacreon)and reconstructedthe town. It controlled an exten- 2pgs-6s6veredwith vineyards and fertile,' accordingto Pindar. An ear of in is shownon its fine coins.However, the Abderanswere constantly at pains protect their territory from Thracian incursions.Nevertheless, their city was a centerfor trading with the Thracian (Odrysian)rulers of the hinterland, d provided a harbor for the commerce of upper Thrace in general. \\'hen the Persians came to Thrace in 5131512they took control of Abdera, did so once againtn 492.In 480 it was one of the halting placesselected Xerxesas he marchedthe Persianarmy along the northern shoresof the Ae- n toward Greece. As a member of the first Athenian Alliance (Delian ue) establishedafter the end of the PersianWars, it contributed (from 454 a sum of betweenten and fifteen talents,indicating its position as the third- hestcity in the League.ln 431,at the beginningof the PeloponnesianWar inst Sparta, tltook the lead in an endeavor to enroll Thrace (under the Odry- ruler Sitalces)and Macedoniain the Athenian cause.Although'Abderite' becamea synonym for stupidity, Abdera producedtwo fifth-century think- of outstandingdistinction, Democritusand Protagoras.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient History
    ANCIENT HISTORY 500 – 440 BC Evaluate the contribution of Miltiades and Themistocles to the Greek victory over the Persians from 490 to 479 BC. During the Persian Wars a number of personalities arose to challenge the threat from across the Aegean, all of them with personal motivations, strategies, diplomatic initiatives and policies. Greek politics were tense at the time of the Persian wars as Herodotus reports,“Among the Athenian commanders opinion was divided”. Some of the prominent personalities of both Athens and Sparta include Aristides, Themistocles, Leonidas, Miltiades and Pausanius. However it was Miltiades and Themistocles that made the greatest contribution to Greek Victory. Both Miltiades and Themistocles used their prior experience as well as thought out tactics to outplay the ‘unbeatable’ Persian army. Separately, these two personalities successfully led the Greeks to victory through the battles of Marathon and Salamis, as well as a number of significant catalysts. Despite this, the contribution of Themistocles to the Persian Wars may have been greater than that of Miltiades due to the lasting effect his changes made to the entire war effort but this may have been due to the length of their time in power. Miltiades was not always respected by his Athenian counterparts as previous to the Persian Wars he had acted as vassal to the Persian King, Darius I. The Ionian Revolt proved a great turning point for many Greeks who were under Persian influence. Miltiades joined the revolt and returned to Athens but was imprisoned for the crime of tyranny with the sentence of death. However, he was able to prove himself anti-Persian and was released.
    [Show full text]
  • World History Chp
    World History Chp. 5, sec. 3 notes Pericles’ Plan for Athens Drama, sculpture, poetry, philosophy, architecture, and science reached new heights. (Golden Age) Pericles’ period of leadership (461 to 429 B.C.) known as Age of Pericles. Pericles’ three goals: 1. strengthen Athenian democracy = paid more public officials so more could participate. Direct democracy. 2. hold and strengthen empire = used Delian League treasury to increase power of Athenian navy. Angered allies. 3. glorify Athens = used Delian League money to beautify Athens through art and Architecture. Pericles angered other members of the Delian League Glorious Art and Architecture Pericles’ plan to beautify Athens included building the Parthenon, temple to Athena. Phidias given the job to create Parthenon. Classical art – Greek sculptors emphasized harmony, order, and proportion. artists wanted to portray ideal beauty, not realism. Golden Age (477 to 431 B.C.) – drama, poetry, philosophy, sculptors/ ideal beauty, not realism. Drama and History Greeks invented drama as art form and built first theaters in the West. Two types of drama: 1. tragedy 2. comedy Tragedy: serious drama about themes of love, hate, war, or betrayal. Main character met downfall because of tragic flaw such as hubris.(excessive pride) Three notable tragedians: 1. Aeschylus – The Orestia 2. Sophocles – Oedipus the King, Antigone 3. Euripedes – Medea Comedy: made fun of politics and respected people and ideas of the time. Aristophanes wrote some of first comedies. Comedy reflected the Athenian freedom and openness. History: Herodotus (father of history) pioneered accurate recording of events. Book on Persian Wars. Thucydides (greatest historian of classical age) believed studying the past could give insight into present because certain themes in history recur.
    [Show full text]
  • The Athenian Empire
    Week 8: The Athenian Empire Lecture 13, The Delian League, Key Words Aeschylus’ Persians Plataea Mycale Second Ionian Revolt Samos Chios Lesbos Leotychidas Xanthippus Sestos Panhellenism Medizers Corinth Common Oaths Common Freedom Asia Minor Themistocles Pausanias Dorcis Hegemony by Invitation Aristides Uliades of Samos Byzantium Hybris Delos Ionia Hellespont Caria Thrace NATO UN Phoros Hellenotamias Synod Local Autonomy 1 Lecture 14, From League to Empire, Key Words Eion Strymon Scyros Dolopians Cleruchy Carystus Naxos Eurymedon Caria Lycia Thasos Ennea Hodoi Indemnity Diodorus Thucydides Athenian Imperial Democracy Tribute Lists Garrisons 2 Chronological Table for the Pentekontaetia 479-431 481/0 Hellenic League, a standard offensive and defensive alliance (symmachia), formed with 31 members under Spartan leadership. 480/79 Persian War; battles under Spartan leadership: Thermopylae (King Leonidas), Artemesium and Salamis (Eurybiades), Plataea (Pausanias), and Mycale (King Leotychides). 479 Thank-offerings dedicated at Delphi for victory over Persia including serpent column listing 31 cities faithful to “the Hellenes”. Samos, Chios, and Lesbos, and other islanders enrolled in the Hellenic League. Sparta, alarmed by the growth of Athenian power and daring, send envoys to urge the Athenians not to rebuild their walls, but Themistocles rejects the idea and tricks the envoys; Athenians rebuild walls using old statues as ‘fill’, while Themistocles is on diplomatic mission to Sparta. Following the departure of Leotychides and the Peloponnesian contingents, Xanthippus and the Athenians cross over to Sestos on the European side of the Hellespont, lay siege to the town, and capture the Persian fortress. Themistocles persuades the Athenians to complete fortifications at Piraeus, begun in 492; while Cimon promotes cooperation with Sparta, Themistocles hostile to the hegemon of the Peloponnesian and Hellenic leagues; attempts to rouse anti-Spartan feelings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Delian League and Athenian Imperialism
    The Delian League, Athenian Imperialism and the Peloponnesian War The Delian League The Delian League For the Greeks, who had just won the Persian Wars, that conflict was a beginning, not an end. Defeat of the Persians had created a power vacuum in the Aegean. This favored the city-state with the strongest navy. Athens and her allies formed the Delian League.(island of Delos, sacred shrine) intended as a free alliance under Athenian leadership; Athens provided most of the warships and crews; Athenian Success Has a Sinister Side While the Athenians drove the Persians out of the Aegean, they also became increasingly imperialistic; turned the Delian League into an Athenian Empire; Athenian allies reduced to status of subjects; Athens harshly suppressed dissident or rebellious governments; installed puppet governments; collected dues by force; Aggressive expansion of Athens alarmed Sparta; 459 B.C to 455 B.C. The Peloponnesian War (431-404 B.C.) “This day will be the beginning of great evil for the Greeks.” Spartan Ambassador The war lasted a generation and brought in its wake plagues, famine, civil wars, widespread destruction and huge loss of life. Sparta invaded Athenian territory 5 times in the first 7 years. Athenians remained behind walls; eventually plague; (Pericles himself dies) • A new breed of politicians – rash, ambitious, and more self-serving; • Temporary peace in 421 B.C. A cold war; • Alcibiades – widened war to further his own career; convinced Athens to attack Syracuse in Sicily; FAILURE; Athenian force defeated; Athens and Melos • Athens sent fleet to the neutral island of Melos with an ultimatum: surrender or perish; • Melians resisted.
    [Show full text]
  • Delian League, NATO, Small State, Super Power, Alliance, Democracy
    What is more valuable in the creation of an alliance, democratic values or hegemonic state? The cases of the Delian League and NATO Name: Dimitrios Tsikas MA Thesis in International Affairs Supervisor: Page Louise Wilson University of Iceland 2019 Abstract This dissertation is trying to analyze the past and the present of the formation of alliances between political subjects, cities-states in the past and states at present time. In global scene alliances and international organizations, in general, are having significant role such as United Nations (UN), North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) in the present and League of Nations, Warsaw Pack and Delian League in the past. Correspondingly, this essay attempts to answer the following question: What is more valuable into an alliance, democratic values or hegemonic state? The methodology used for this dissertation is mainly qualitative research. Many primary sources are used, mainly Ancient Greek writers from the original documents, in ancient Greek. In addition, many secondary sources are used. The first part of the essay (chapter 1 and 2) are setting the framework. In chapter 1 we are referring to method and methodology which follow in the dissertation, setting the research questions. In second chapter we are providing essential information about the formation of alliance and the meaning of democracy applicable to this essay. In the second part (chapters 3 and 4) the two case – studies are examined and analysing the meaning of democracy as a value among the alliances (chapter 3) and in chapter 4, we examine the role of superpower state in the alliance, providing historical examples.
    [Show full text]
  • Greco-Persian Wars Comics # # Greco-Persian Wars Comics
    # Greco-Persian Wars Comics # # Greco-Persian Wars Comics # Follow along to learn about new terms and create comic strips for the Greco-Persian Wars... # Greco-Persian Wars Comics # Fold your blank paper into 8 squares (4x2). When you see the red numbered symbol, fill in one of your eight comic strip boxes with a title, caption and drawing for that slide. Be sure that your titles or captions include all 10 of the key terms listed on the left! 1 Persian Empire 2 Hellenism 3 Mesopotamia 4 Golden Age 5 Greco-Persian Wars 6 Ionian Revolt 7 Darius 8 Xerxes 9 Delian League 10 Asia Minor # Greco-Persian Wars Comics # Fold your blank paper into 8 squares (4x2). When you see the red numbered symbol, fill in one of your eight comic strip boxes with a title, caption and drawing for that slide. Be sure that your titles or captions include all 10 of the key terms listed on the left! 1 Persian Empire 2 Hellenism 3 Mesopotamia 4 Golden Age 5 Greco-Persian Wars 6 Ionian Revolt 7 Darius 8 Xerxes 9 Delian League 10 Asia Minor # Greco-Persian Wars Comics # Follow along to learn about new terms and create comic strips for the Greco-Persian Wars... 1 Persian Empire had been on the rise 2 Greek kingdoms reach a Golden Age 3 Cyrus appoints tyrants to rule Ionia 4 Greek rebellions across Asia Minor 5 Darius squashes the Ionian revolts 6 Persian plan to crush all of Greece 7 Darius & Xerxes struggle for years 8 Greeks go back on the offensive 1 Greco-Persian Wars Comics 1 1 Persian Empire had been on the rise The Persians originated in what is now Iran.
    [Show full text]
  • AH1 Option 2 Delian League
    1 JACT Teachers’ Notes AH 1.2 Delian League to Athenian Empire 1.1 Books and Resources The best collection of sources is the Athenian Empire LACTOR no. 1 in its fourth edition, ed. R. Osborne. But it is much more than a collection of sources, as it includes excellent commentaries and editorial interventions. Note: these notes frequently refer to Osborne’s LACTOR 14. The still unsurpassed study of Athenian power in the fifth century BC is R. Meiggs’ Athenian Empire. An excellent introduction to the subject, its sources and the historical questions surrounding it is P. J. Rhodes (ed.), The Athenian Empire (Greece and Rome, New Surveys in the Classics no. 17), with addenda (1993). A recent and wide-ranging collection of articles is Polly Low’s Athenian Empire (Edinburgh, 2008) in the Edinburgh Readings series – this excellent collection republishes, updates and translates articles on the origins, development and chronology of the empire, its methods of control, the costs and benefits of empire for the Athenians and subjects, its popularity, and the forms of propaganda employed by the Athenians. The author of these notes has drawn extensively on this collection and on Low’s introductions. R. Parker (et al, eds), Interpreting the Athenian Empire (Duckworth, 2008) will contain useful articles on the chronology of development, historiography, politics, relations with the east. It draws heavily on the extended possibilities of using archaeology to write the history of the subject. Internet resources for the Athenian Empire are limited. If one can locate Athens’ allies on a map of the ancient world (such as the Barrington atlas), it is occasionally possible to get an aerial view of sites of those cities through Google earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Greece the Peloponnesian War
    Ancient Greece The Peloponnesian War Greek Vase – Two warriors Playing a game http://www.aurorahistoryboutique.com/products/M000059_L.jpg Greek City-States Greece was made up of city-states – Each had their own government and economy Athens and Sparta were two of the greatest Greek city-states Sparta valued fighting and physical strength Athens valued intelligence and thinking Both city-states played important roles in Ancient Greece – Even though they were rivals Clip Art History Textbook History Textbook History Textbook History Textbook Delian League Athens and Sparta sometimes worked together to defend Greece (Persian Wars) After the Persian Wars, an alliance was created – Alliance – An agreement to work together – Sparta was not in this alliance The alliances were meant to defend Greece Everybody had to give money to the alliance – The money was kept on the island of Delos – Called the Delian League http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pericles Island of Delos http://www.mlahanas.de/Greeks/Cities/GreeceAegean.gif http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Athens Athenian Empire Athens was the most powerful city in the Delian League – Treated other cities as subjects – No one could quit the League, and more cities were forced to join Athenians took the League’s money for use in Athens – Delian League became an Athenian Empire http://www.kidspast.com/images/peloponnesian-war.jpg The Peloponnesian War Sparta joined an alliance called the Peloponnesian League – To make sure Athens didn’t get too powerful, Sparta declared war on Athens
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Alexander: 337 BC
    Specialized Agencies The Rise of Alexander: 337 BC The Rise of Alexander: 337 BC Dear Delegates, Welcome to the Rise of Alexander committee! We are honoured to have you join us on this Specialized Agency and take part in round #29 of the North American Model United Nations, hosted on the beautiful campus of Victoria College. Tina will be your Chair for the committee. She is currently a second year student, double majoring in Genome Biology and Economics. She has been involved in Model UN for two years now. She is also a photographer for the University’s student newspaper. Mariyan is your moderator. He is a History and Political Science Double Major in his third academic year. The Vice Director is Liam, who has also been previously engaged in Model UN and is an experienced member of NAMUN. Finally, the Crisis Manager is Stephanie Lim. For this committee, we will time travel back to Greece, 337 BC to revive and rewrite history. The first topic will challenge the strength of the League of Corinth in its infancy. Under Philip II’s leadership, the League will create military strategies against Persia, whose threat is ever more imminent as it makes its own military movements. The second topic tests the League’s unity in the possible event of a loss of leadership. The League will discuss how to continue its military course with or without a new leader. Thirdly, the League will take advantage of its bond and explore opportunities for collaborative economic development. The committee will begin in the winter of 337 BC.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7, “The Glory of Ancient Greece”
    Chapter 7, “The Glory of Ancient Greece” STUDY GUIDE Directions: Using your Chapter 7, Sections 1-3 guided notes or pages 196-224 in the textbook, answer the following questions to help you prepare for your Chapter 7 test. Define the following terms: • Athens • Agora • Vendor • Slavery • Sparta • Helots • Peloponnesian War • Plague • Blockade • Barbarians • Assassinate • Alexander the Great • Hellenistic 1. What did young boys growing up in Athens have to look forward to? 2. What was the Agora in Athens like? 3. What was the Greeks’ lifestyle like (homes, meals, etc.)? 4. What were the roles of women in Athens? 5. A blockade prevented Athens from doing what during the Peloponnesian War? 6. What was the cause of Athens’ decline after the Peloponnesian War? 7. What were Helots forced to do by Spartans? 8. What was the one basic rule of Sparta? 9. Why were the Acropolis and the Parthenon so important in Athens? 10. How did Greek city-states interact with one another? 11. Why were Spartan boys encouraged to steal during their training? 12. Who were the heroes of the Battle of Marathon? 13. How did Athens treat other city-states in the Delian League? 14. What did overcrowded conditions in Athens lead to during the Peloponnesian War? 15. Who fought one another during the Peloponnesian War? 16. Spartan men served in the military until they were how old? 17. According to Athenian custom, how did men believe women should be? 18. What happened during the Battle of Marathon? Who won? 19. How did Alexander the Great rise to power? 20.
    [Show full text]