DOCSLIB.ORG

Bs4630e Service Bulletin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bs4630e Service Bulletin SERVICE BULLETIN BS4630E REFERENCE: Nova Bus Manuals APPLICATION DEADLINE: 2020DE15 SECTION: 11: Exhaust system CLAIM REFERENCE NUMBER: WB-4630 RS NO: MQR 7621-1804 EFFECTIVE IN PROD.: LB40 (2019MA) SUBJECT: DPF active regeneration When Fast idle is active the engine parameter prevents the engine from doing an active JUSTIFICATION: regeneration. DIRECT CHARGES LEVEL DESCRIPTION TIME LABOUR MATERIAL Change engine parameter active regen in pto and remote modes 1 Nova Bus Nova Bus 30 min to Enable. 2 – – – – MATERIAL QTY PART NO REV. DESCRIPTION REPLACES PART N° LEVEL 1 –– – – – – LEVEL 2 – – – – – DISPOSAL OF PARTS DISCARDED RETAINED REMOVED PARTS ARE: – – REVISION HISTORY REV. DATE CHANGE DESCRIPTION WRITTEN BY NR 2019DE05 Initial release Luc Carignan APPROVED BY: PAGE 1 OF 8 NQF772001 VERSION 3 SERVICE BULLETIN BS4630E ROAD NUMBER VIN (2NVY/4RKY...) CLIENT ORDER QTY FROM TO FROM TO Academy Busline - New Jersey LA13 — — L82J4G9775611 L82J5G9775620 10 Airdrie Transit - Alberta LC17 3725 3726 L82J3K3751850 L82J5K3751851 2 Airdrie Transit Alberta LB10 3718 3718 L82J1J9776464 L82J1J9776464 1 Ames Transportation Agency - Iowa L904 6101 6104 S92J1G9775221 S92J7G9775224 4 Austin - CMTA - Texas LA17 5101 5107 S92J2H9775763 S92J3H9775769 7 Austin - CMTA - Texas LA18 5151 5158 L82J0H9775770 L82J3H9775777 8 Barrie Ontario - Metrolinx L878 1501 1504 L82JXF3001691 L82J6F3001719 4 Barrie Ontario - Metrolinx L955 1601 1604 L82J7G9775408 L82J9G9775412 4 Barrie Ontario - Metrolinx LA31 1701 1705 L82J0H9775817 L82J2H9775821 5 Barrie Ontario - Metrolinx LA49 1706 1713 L82J7H3750855 L82J4H3750862 8 BC Transit - BCT - British Columbia L891 — — L82J5F3001565 L82J2F3001569 5 BC Transit - BCT - British Columbia LA16 6000 6029 L82J3H9776217 L82J4H9776307 30 Bow Valley Transit - Alberta LB86 N/A N/A L82J8K9777001 L82J1K9777003 3 Bow Valley Transit - Alberta L993 - - L82JXG3750329 L82J6G3750330 2 Bow Valley Transit - Alberta LA26 — — L82J4H3750473 L82J4H3750473 1 Bow Valley Transit - Alberta LA28 — — L82J6H9776308 L82J4H9776310 3 Brampton - Ontario L941 1614 1623 L82J1G3750123 L82J2G3750132 10 Brampton - Ontario L942 1601 1613 L82J6G3750070 L82J4G3750083 13 Brampton - Ontario LA20 1707 1713 L82J5H3750532 L82J6H3750538 7 Brampton - Ontario LA21 1701 1706 L82J8H3750539 L82J1H3750544 6 Brampton - Ontario LB01 1801 1817 L82J3H3750948 L82J6J3750982 17 Brampton - Ontario LB02 1818 1823 L82J3J3751121 L82J2J3751126 6 Brampton - Ontario LC23 1901 1907 L82J3K3751878 L82J9K3751884 7 Brampton - Ontario LC54 1908 1916 L82J0K3751885 L82JXK3751893 9 Brandon - Manitoba L899 67 70 L82J2G3750180 L82J8G3750183 4 Brantford - Ontario L928 10151 10153 L82J7F3001793 L82J0F3001795 3 Brantford - Ontario LA03 10161 10612 L82J0G3750369 L82J7G3750370 2 Brantford - Ontario LB64 101808 101810 L82J2J3751465 L82J6J3751467 3 Burlington - Ontario L887 7017-15 7025-15 L82J7F3001681 L82J8F3001723 9 Burlington - Ontario LB35 7033-18 7036-18 L82J9J3751432 L82J0J3751433 2 Cape Breton Nova Scotia LA12 7092 7093 L82J8H3750587 L82JXH3750588 2 Cape Breton Nova Scotia LB92 7100 7101 L82J3K3751766 L82J5K3751767 2 Capital Area Rural Transportation System (CARTS) L980 — — L82J1G9775565 L82J9G9775569 3 Texas Chicago Transit Authority - CTA - Illinois L850 8150 8199 L82J5F4500924 L82J6G9775013 50 Chicago Transit Authority - CTA - Illinois L943 8200 8324 L82JXG9775225 L82J3G9775406 125 Chicago Transit Authority - CTA - Illinois LB58 8325 8349 L82J7J9776906 L82J8J9776946 25 CMBC (TransLink) - British Columbia LB31 18301 18404 L82L8J3751245 L82L3J3751444 104 CMBC (TransLink) - British Columbia LB32 18451 18473 L82J5J9776726 L82J4J9776748 23 Cold Lake LA99 5013 5014 L82J7J3751302 L82J9J3751303 2 Cornwall - Ontario LB55 — — L82J8J3751468 L82J8J3751468 1 Cornwall Ontario - Metrolinx L935 — — L82J3F3001838 L82J5F3001839 2 Cornwall Ontario - Metrolinx LA53 — — L82J2H3750892 L82J6H3750894 3 Demo- Altoona HEV BAE (REF LA95) LB38 — — L82L7H3750940 L82L7H3750940 1 Demo BAE Nova LA94 — — L82L3H3750806 L82L3H3750806 1 PAGE 2 OF 8 NQF772001 VERSION 3 SERVICE BULLETIN BS4630E ROAD NUMBER VIN (2NVY/4RKY...) CLIENT ORDER QTY FROM TO FROM TO Duke University - North Carolina L938 - - L82L8G9775399 L82L0G9775400 2 Duke University - North Carolina LB08 — — L82L9J3751562 L82L2J3751578 3 Duke University - North Carolina LA38 — — L82L9H9775994 L82L9H9775994 1 Duke University - North Carolina LA39 — — S92LXH9775995 S92LXH9775995 1 Durham Region Transit - Ontario LB36 6100 6112 L82J2J3751417 L82J7J3751431 13 Durham Region Transit Ontario - Metrolinx L888 8554 8559 L82J2F3001703 L82J1F3001708 6 Durham Region Transit Ontario - Metrolinx L996 8560 8563 L82J1G3750414 L82J7G3750417 4 Durham Region Transit Ontario - Metrolinx LA19 8564 8565 L82J9G3750418 L82J0G3750419 2 Durham Region Transit Ontario - Metrolinx LA50 8566 8578 L82JXH3750901 L82J1H3750916 13 Durham Region Transit Ontario - Metrolinx LB11 8579 8589 L82J2H9776354 L82J0H9776367 11 Durham Region Transit Ontario - Metrolinx LB60 7100 7103 L82J5J3751539 L82J5J3751542 4 Fredericton - New Brunswick L968 8161 8162 L82J1G3750218 L82J3G3750219 2 Fredericton - New Brunswick LA15 8171 8174 L82J1H3750589 L82J1H3750592 4 Fredericton - New Brunswick LA33 8181 8184 L82J6H3750944 L82J1H3750947 4 Guelph - Ontario L927 244 247 L82J1F3001756 L82J9F3001763 4 Guelph - Ontario L985 248 251 L82J7G3750255 L82J2G3750258 4 Guelph - Ontario LA54 252 275 L82J1H3750849 L82J0H3750891 24 Halifax - Nova Scotia LA11 1208 1236 L82J1G9775579 L82J4G9775608 29 Halifax - Nova Scotia LA14 1237 1237 L82J1G9775596 L82J1G9775596 1 Halifax - Nova Scotia LA27 1238 1276 L82J5H9775778 L82J9H9775816 39 Halifax - Nova Scotia LB61 1277 1284 L82J9J9776664 L82J6J9776671 8 Halifax - Nova Scotia LB70 1285 1299 L82J4J9776829 L82J9J9776843 15 Houston - Texas L951 1915 1915 L82J0G9775203 L82J0G9775203 1 Houston - Texas L952 1580 1580 S92J5G9775318 S92J5G9775318 1 Houston - Texas L981 1916 1994 L82J8G9775434 L82J4G9775513 79 Houston - Texas L982 1581 1582 S92J5G9775514 S92J7G9775515 2 Houston - Texas L982 1583 1583 S92J9G9775516 S92J9G9775516 1 Houston - Texas L982 1584 1586 S92J2G9775518 S92J4G9775522 3 Houston - Texas L982 1587 1587 S92J8G9775524 S92J8G9775524 1 Houston - Texas L982 1588 1599 S92J1G9775526 S92J5G9775545 12 Kingston - Ontario LB34 1821 1841 L82J3J3751412 L82J0J3751416 5 Kingston Ontario - Metrolinx L880 1502 1502 L82JXF3001786 L82JXF3001786 1 Kingston Ontario - Metrolinx L889 1687 1689 L82J1G3750252 L82J5G3750254 3 Kingston Ontario - Metrolinx L925 1504 1510 L82J5F3001808 L82J5F3001811 4 Kingston Ontario - Metrolinx L954 1683 1686 L82J4G3750259 L82J4G3750262 4 Kingston Ontario - Metrolinx LA59 1803 1818 L82JXH3750932 L82J4H3750943 11 Kingston Ontario - Metrolinx LA60 1825 1837 L82J7H3750922 L82J8H3750931 6 Kingston Ontario - Metrolinx LB68 1901 1901 L82J1K3751913 L82J1K3751913 1 Kingston Ontario - Metrolinx LB69 1920 1951 L82J3K3751914 L82J0K3751918 5 Lethbridge - Alberta L997 181 186 L82J5G9775570 L82JXG9775578 6 Lethbridge - Alberta LA91 189 192 L82J3J9776580 L82J9J9776583 4 Lethbridge - Alberta LB95 193 198 L82J1K3751894 L82J0K3751899 6 Milton - Ontario LB33 1804 1804 L82J7J3751543 L82J7J3751543 1 Milton - Ontario - Metrolinx L884 1701 1702 L82J0G3750338 L82J2G3750339 2 Milton - Ontario - Metrolinx LA51 1801 1803 L82J3H3750917 L82J7H3750919 3 PAGE 3 OF 8 NQF772001 VERSION 3 SERVICE BULLETIN BS4630E ROAD NUMBER VIN (2NVY/4RKY...) CLIENT ORDER QTY FROM TO FROM TO Mississauga Ontario LA64 1730 1766 L82J2H9776077 L82J7H9776253 37 Mississauga Ontario LA65 1770 1799 S92J8H9776254 S92J2H9776315 30 Mississauga Ontario LB12 1801 1812 L82J9J9776714 L82J3J9776725 12 Moncton (Codiac) - New Brunswick LA06 — — L82J3G9775552 L82JXG9775564 9 Moncton (Codiac) - New Brunswick LA42 — — L82J8H9776066 L82J0H9776076 11 Moncton (Codiac) - New Brunswick LA58 — — L82J2J9776389 L82J2J9776389 1 Moncton (Codiac) - New Brunswick LB84 N/A N/A L82J3K9777004 L82J3K9777004 1 NFTA - Buffalo, New York LA30 1717 1724 L82J8H9775838 L82J5H9775845 8 NFTA - Buffalo, New York LB21 1817 1824 L82J9J9776518 L82J8J9776526 8 Niagara Falls - Ontario L987 1601 1604 L82J6G3750344 L82J1G3750347 4 Niagara Falls Ontario - Metrolinx LA97 1805 1808 L82J0J3750993 L82J6J3750996 4 Niagara Falls Ontario - Metrolinx LA98 1809 1810 S92J7J3751003 S92J9J3751004 2 Niagara Falls Ontario - Metrolinx LB13 1811 1811 L82J8J3750997 L82J8J3750997 1 Niagara Parks Commission - Ontario L656 — — L82U0C3000653 L82U2C3000654 2 Niagara Parks Commission - Ontario L685 — — S92U9C3000644 S92U8C3000652 9 North Bay - Ontario L895 784 785 L82J7F3001678 L82J9F3001679 2 North Bay - Ontario L979 786 787 L82J4G3750312 L82J6G3750313 2 North Bay - Ontario LB48 788 790 L82J7J3751395 L82J0J3751397 3 Oakville - Ontario LB93 — — L82J3K3751749 L82J5K3751753 5 Oakville Ontario - Metrolinx L881 — — L82J2F3001717 L82J8F3001740 5 Oakville Ontario - Metrolinx L945 - - L82J9G3750211 L82JXG3750217 7 Oakville Ontario - Metrolinx LA55 — — L82J6H3750880 L82J5H3750885 6 Orillia Ontario - Metrolinx L965 1722 1724 L82J3G3750320 L82J7G3750322 3 Orillia Ontario - Metrolinx LA61 1825 1826 L82J2J3751031 L82J4J3751032 2 Ottawa - OC transpo LB80 4601 4609 L82J0J3751576 L82J3J3751586 9 Ottawa - OC transpo LC16 4610 4682 L82J7K3751771 L82JXK3751912 73 Peterborough - Ontario L870 61 63 L82JXF3001612 L82J3F3001614 3 Peterborough - Ontario L919 64 66 L82J6F3001767 L82JXF3001769 3 Peterborough - Ontario L966 67 71 L82J2G3750230 L82JXG3750234 5 Peterborough - Ontario LA41 7217 7617 L82J1H3750706 L82J3H3750710 5 Peterborough - Ontario LB20 7819 8019 L82J2K3751919 L82J0K3751921 3 Red Deer - Alberta L869 — — L82J9F3001570
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cross-Boundary Transit Service Integration Pilot Project
    9.8 Date: May 25, 2021 Originator’s files: To: Chair and Members of General Committee From: Geoff Wright, P.Eng, MBA, Commissioner of Meeting date: Transportation and Works June 9, 2021 Subject Cross-Boundary Transit Service Integration Pilot Project Recommendation 1. That the report to General Committee entitled “Cross-Boundary Transit Service Integration Pilot Project” dated May 25, 2021 from the Commissioner of Transportation and Works be received for information. 2. That Phase 1 of the Service Integration Pilot Project recommendations for enhanced cross-boundary travel be received for information. Executive Summary The Ministry of Transportation has convened a Fare and Service Integration (FSI) Provincial-Municipal Table that includes representatives of all transit agencies and aims to improve connections and the customer experience for inter-municipal transit travel. The Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) has engaged a consultant team to develop an agency-driven FSI model to present to the Provincial-Municipal Table in partnership with surrounding transit agencies including MiWay. Currently MiWay, along with several other 905 agencies, are prohibited from providing local service within City of Toronto, resulting in TTC providing duplicate service for their residents. In addition, transit fares are not integrated between the TTC and MiWay. In partnership with the TTC, the Burnhamthorpe Road corridor has been selected for a transit service integration pilot project in the near-term (targeting fall 2021). 9.8 General Committee 2021/05/25 2 Background For decades, transit service integration has been discussed and studied in the Greater Toronto Hamilton Area (GTHA). The Ministry of Transportation’s newly convened Fare and Service Integration (FSI) Provincial-Municipal Table consists of senior representatives from transit systems within the Greater Toronto Hamilton Area (GTHA) and the broader GO Transit service area.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Cochrane Transit Task Force Local Transit
    TOWN OF COCHRANE TRANSIT TASK FORCE LOCAL TRANSIT SERVICE RECOMMENDATION TO TOWN COUNCIL August 30, 2018 Contents Section 1: INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 3 Section 2: THE TRANSIT TASK FORCE ....................................................................................................... 8 Section 3: BACKGROUND.......................................................................................................................... 10 3.1 GreenTRIP Funding & Allocation .................................................................................................... 10 3.2 GreenTRIP Funding Conditions ....................................................................................................... 11 Section 4: FINANCIAL RISK ASSESSMENT .............................................................................................. 12 Section 5: PREVIOUS FIXED ROUTE OPTIONS ......................................................................................... 15 Section 6: THE RATIONAL OF PUBLIC TRANSIT ...................................................................................... 18 6.1 Local Transit Initial Assessment of Other Municipalities .............................................................. 18 6.2 Economic Rational for Transit ........................................................................................................ 21 6.3 Regional Traffic Congestion & Time and Fuel Savings ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Escribe Agenda Package
    COMMUNITY SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA July 13, 2015 7:00 pm COUNCIL CHAMBERS 400 MAIN STREET SE Pages 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS 3. ADOPTION OF MINUTES 3.1 Minutes of June 8, 2015 1 4. PUBLIC QUESTION PERIOD 5. STAFF REPORTS 5.1 Annual Review of Fees and Charges for Recreation Facilities and Programs 7 5.2 Feasibility of a Trial Bus Service Between Airdrie & Crossfield 18 6. COUNCIL SYNOPSIS 6.1 June 15, 2015 Council Synopsis 48 7. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS/QUESTIONS 8. NEXT MEETING - September 14, 2015 9. ADJOURNMENT COMMUNITY SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD JUNE 8, 2015 Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Community Services Advisory Board of the City of Airdrie, in the Province of Alberta, held in Council Chambers with the following: PRESENT Chair Alderman K. Hegg Members Alderman D. Belyk L. Blanchette Alderman F. Burley C. Goodman D. MacEachen R. McMullen S. Quinn B. Ryan Staff C. Aragon V. Groen K. Harris M. Lock C. MacIsaac M. McAllister C. O’Donoghue D. Tinkler R. White ABSENT WITH REGRETS K. Anderson CALL TO ORDER The Chair called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. AGENDA APPROVAL 2015-CSAB-024 R. McMullen moved "that the Community Services Advisory Board accept the Adoption of Agenda agenda of June 8, 2015 as circulated." June 8, 2015 Carried MINUTES 2015-CSAB-025 Alderman Belyk moved "that the Community Services Advisory Board adopt the Adoption of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting of May 11, 2015 as presented." May 11, 2015 Carried STAFF REPORTS Town & Country Hall Lease Change K.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan Stratégique Du Sentier Récréatif Régional De Prescott Et Russell
    City of Clarence-Rockland Transit Feasibility Study Final Report October 2014 Final Report : Clarence-Rockland Transit Feasibility Study City of Clarence-Rockland Transit Feasibility Study Final Report MMM Project Number: 3414021 October 2014 ii Project Number – 3414021 – October 2014 Clarence-Rockland... a quiet, picturesque city nestled on the shores of the historic Ottawa River, an important waterway for early explorers, fur traders and missionaries. With its humble beginnings as a lumber town almost 140 years ago, Clarence-Rockland has matured into a beautiful city of a little over 20,000 people. Situated just 32 kilometers east of Parliament Hill and about 170 kilometers west of Montreal, the area offers both the quiet of the countryside and the urban offerings of a big city. Along with a healthy distribution of nature's splendor there's also plenty of things to keep urbanites busy. We are a fully bilingual community with a full range of churches, schools and sports facilities which offer endless choices for those who have grown accustomed to essential amenities. (From: http://www.clarence-rockland.com/index.php/en/ - July 7, 2014) Project Number – 3414021 – October 2014 i Table of Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose and objectives ................................................................................ 1 1.2 Organization of the report ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Tale of 40 Cities: a Preliminary Analysis of Equity Impacts of COVID-19 Service Adjustments Across North America July 2020 Mc
    A tale of 40 cities: A preliminary analysis of equity impacts of COVID-19 service adjustments across North America James DeWeese, Leila Hawa, Hanna Demyk, Zane Davey, Anastasia Belikow, and Ahmed El-Geneidy July 2020 McGill University Abstract To cope with COVID-19 confinement measures and precipitous declines in ridership, public transport agencies across North America have made significant adjustments to their services, slashing trip frequency in many areas while increasing it in others. These adjustments, especially service cuts, appear to have disproportionately affected areas where lower income and more- vulnerable groups reside in North American Cities. This paper compares changes in service frequency across 30 U.S. and 10 Canadian cities, linking these changes to average income levels and a vulnerability index. The study highlights the wide range of service outcomes while underscoring the potential for best practices that explicitly account for vertical equity, or social justice, in their impacts when adjusting service levels. Research Question and Data Public transport ridership in North American Cities declined dramatically by the end of March 2020 as governments applied confinement measures in response to COVID-19 pandemic (Hart, 2020; Vijaya, 2020). In an industry that depends heavily on fare-box recovery to pay for operations and sometimes infrastructure loans (Verbich, Badami, & El-Geneidy, 2017), transport agencies faced major financial strains, even as the pandemic magnified their role as a critical public service, ferrying essential, often low-income, workers with limited alternatives to their jobs (Deng, Morissette, & Messacar, 2020). Public transport agencies also faced major operating difficulties due to absenteeism among operators (Hamilton Spectator, 2020) and enhanced cleaning protocols.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Agency Responses to COVID-19: a Review of Challenges and Opportunities for Continued Service Delivery
    Transit Agency Responses to COVID-19: A review of challenges and opportunities for continued service delivery By: Ellen McGowan April 2021 School of Urban and Regional Planning Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada Supervisor: Dr. Ajay Agarwal Copyright © Ellen McGowan 2021 Acknowledgements I would first like to acknowledge my supervisor, Dr. Ajay Agarwal, whose expertise was invaluable in formulating the research questions and methodology. Thank you for your support and generosity over the last two years. I would like to thank the Norman D. Wilson Fellowship for funding this research. I would also like to thank my parents and Mark for their endless encouragement. Finally, I could not have completed this report without the support of my friends at SURP. Although our time together was cut short, I’m grateful for all that first year brought us. 2 Executive Summary Background & Context The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has radically impacted public transport ridership and service provision across the country. Since the outbreak of the virus, transit agencies have had to adapt to new and rapidly evolving conditions. Many agencies modified services to reflect lower ridership levels and to ensure the safety of both riders and operators. These changes in service were guided by public health agencies, as well as major transit associations like the Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) and International Association of Public Transport (UITP). Other agencies implemented precautionary measures like rear door boarding, temporary fare suspension, and reduced capacity limits to enable the safe continuity of operations. As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, transit agencies are having to strike a balance between providing enough transportation options for essential travel and reducing service offerings to match the declining overall demand for mobility services.
    [Show full text]
  • Triplinx - an Integrated View of Regional Transit
    Triplinx - An Integrated View of Regional Transit Robert Proctor, Diane Kolin ITS Canada February 13, 2017 Triplinx Overview • Background • Features • Strategy • Partnerships • Challenges and Lessons Learned • Future Growth and Innovation 2 Metrolinx Metrolinx, an agency of the Government of Ontario under the Metrolinx Act, 2006, was created to improve the coordination and integration of all modes of transportation in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area. The organization’s mission is to champion, develop and implement an integrated transportation system for our region that enhances prosperity, sustainability and quality of life. The Metrolinx Vision: Working together to transform the way the region moves The Metrolinx Mission: To champion and deliver mobility solutions for the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area 3 The Need for Triplinx Metrolinx is responsible for planning and coordination of transportation in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area Context of the Triplinx initiative: • 11 public transit systems including regional transit (GO Transit) and the UP Express airport service • Each has its own customer information system- of varying maturity Background: • Low public awareness of the amount and quality of transit service • Regional growth is increasing the amount of regional travel involving more than one transit system There was a critical need for: • A one-stop source of transit information • Presentation of all available services as one integrated network 4 The Need for Triplinx • Utilized for the PanAm and Para PanAm games in 2015 – Sporting venues, supplementary services to assist ticket purchasers • A key strategic tool for customer service transit ridership development – Flexible management of multi-agency transit service data – One-stop customer information serving entire travel experience • North American systems, generally: – Blend in-house and third party products.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the PRESTO Contactless Terms and Conditions
    PRESTO CONTACTLESS TERMS & CONDITIONS VERSION 1.1 EFFECTIVE March 10, 2021 INTRODUCTION This is the agreement between you and the PRESTO Service (“PRESTO”) operated through and by Metrolinx, a Crown Agency within the meaning of the Crown Agency Act (Ontario) (“Metrolinx”), for the use of contactless payment media (described below) (the “Terms and Conditions”). For the purposes of these Terms & Conditions and the other documents or agreements incorporated by reference herein or which incorporate these Terms & Conditions by reference therein, the term “PRESTO contactless” means the use by you of a contactless payment media to pay a transit fare on a participating Transit Agency and the services offered by PRESTO in connection with your use of contactless payment media including, but not limited to, use of the PRESTO website (as defined below) and the PRESTO Contact Centre (as defined below). Definitions: In these Terms and Conditions, the user of the PRESTO contactless service is referred to as “you” or “your”; PRESTO is referred to as “PRESTO”, “we”, “our” or “us”; “Transit Agency” refers to GO Transit, Brampton Transit, Burlington Transit, Durham Region Transit, Hamilton Street Railway Company, MiWay (Mississauga), Oakville Transit, Toronto Transit Commission, Union-Pearson Express, York Region Transit, OC Transpo (Ottawa), if it accepts PRESTO contactless, and any other transit agency that accepts payment for its services by way of the PRESTO contactless service that may be added from time to time, and “Transit Agency” refers to any one of them. These Terms & Conditions apply to you when you are using PRESTO contactless to pay your transit fare using contactless payment media on any Transit Agency, and sets out your rights and obligations when using PRESTO contactless.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESTO Update Metrolinx Board
    Tap into an easier commute. Tap into PRESTO Update Metrolinx Board September 15, 2011 1 Summary Modules 1. Introduction P. 3 2. Project Scope P. 5 3. Project Status P. 7 4. Future Direction P. 11 5. OC Transpo View P. 14 6. TTC View P. 16 7. Contact P. 18 2 Introduction 3 What is PRESTO? PRESTO is a centralized provincial e-Fare system based on smartcard technology, providing fare collection, settlement services and information management in Southern and Eastern Ontario Mission: “To provide e -Transit fare and information management systems that improve client service while enabling revenue collection and efficient operations for Ontario Transit Agencies” 4 Project Scope 5 Baseline Scope PRESTO scope as of April 1st, 2006 • 8 transit service pp()providers (SP) were in scope for PRESTO ( ‘905” area) ¾ Brampton Transit, Burlington Transit, Durham Region Transit, GO Transit, Hamilton Street Railway (HSR), MiWay (Mississauga Transit), Oakville Transit, York Region Transit • The original contract with Accenture (10 years), let through Provincial public tender in 2006, encompassed the build, design and operation of the PRESTO System through 2016 at an initial value of $250M. • Municipal SP costs were shared by the Province (1/3) and municipalities (2/3). 6 Project Status 7 Implementation Status Municipal Service Provider Rollout (May 2010 - August 2011): • GTHA delivery complete, including additional installations: ¾ GO bus fleet, TTC (12 subway stations), St. Catharines & Niagara VIA Stations, 3 new garages, new stations, 150 new buses • PRESTO
    [Show full text]
  • Member Motion City Council MM22.3
    Member Motion City Council Notice of Motion MM22.3 ACTION Ward: All GO Transit/Union Pearson Express-Toronto Transit Commission Discounted Fare Initiative - by Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. Recommendations Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, recommends that: 1. City Council request the Province of Ontario to continue the GO/Union Pearson Express- Toronto Transit Commission Discounted Fare Initiative agreement with the City of Toronto based on the terms reached and outlined in Item 2017.EX28.6, Advancing Fare Integration, adopted by City Council at its meeting on November 7, 8 and 9, 2017. Summary Fare integration between transit agencies in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area is an opportunity to increase transit ridership and improve affordability all residents. The Provincial funding of the GO Transit/Union Pearson Express-Toronto Transit Commission Discounted Fare Initiative expired on March 31, 2020. A $1.50 co-fare between GO Transit and the Toronto Transit Commission was introduced in 2018, funded by the Province of Ontario through Metrolinx. Demand for the program is evident from the over 4.5 million more rides than were budgeted for in 2019-20. Before the introduction of the co-fare, approximately 50,000 daily trips used a combination of GO Transit, Toronto Transit Commission and Union Pearson Express. The co-fare between GO Transit and the Toronto Transit Commission increases access to rapid transit. Approximately half of Toronto's Neighbourhood Improvement Areas have a GO Transit station nearby or within the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Mar 24/16 Transportation Standing Committee
    Use of Accessible Transportation to Support Access-A-Bus Services Transportation Standing Committee - 2 - March 24, 2016 DISCUSSION The Access-A-Bus paratransit service is intended to transport people with mobility, sensory and/or cognitive challenges who cannot utilize conventional transit. For many users, the service is necessary to access vital services and enhance quality-of-life. Access-A-Bus Service Demand As illustrated in Table 1 below, there has been a steady increase in service demand since 2012. While additional staff and vehicles have been added to the fleet, demand has outstripped supply; clients who cannot be booked for a trip on a service day are placed on a wait list. The wait list annual totals are illustrated in Table 2. While there was a slight reduction in the annual wait list figures for 2015, this statistic is considered an aberration and the upward trend is projected to continue for follow-on years as demand continues to increase at a pace greater than service supply. 2012-2015 Trips Requested 250,000 192,519 / +3% 196,518 / +2% 200,000 186,922 / +23% 152,371 150,000 100,000 50,000 - 2012 2013 2014 2015 Table 1: Increase in Access-A-Bus Service Demand 2012-15 Access-A-Bus Annual Wait List Totals 6011 6298 6084 4249 2012 2013 2014 2015 Table 2: 2012-2015 Access-A-Bus Annual Wait List In the pursuit of a solution, additional staff and paratransit vehicles will not necessarily address the challenge. While the Access-A-Bus scheduling staff makes every attempt to batch bookings and trips for each paratransit vehicle in the most efficient way possible, the travel patterns and schedules of individual clients often require trips to destinations, local or remote, with only one or two passengers onboard; this is not an optimal use for a scarce vehicle resource of relatively large capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 2017 Transit System Performance Update
    Clause 5 in Report No. 4 of Committee of the Whole was adopted, without amendment, by the Council of The Regional Municipality of York at its meeting held on March 29, 2018. 5 2017 Transit System Performance Update Committee of the Whole recommends: 1. Receipt of the presentation by Ann-Marie Carroll, General Manager, Transit, Transportation Services. 2. Adoption of the following recommendation contained in the report dated February 16, 2018 from the Commissioner of Transportation Services: 1. This report be received for information. Report dated February 16, 2018 from the Commissioner of Transportation now follows: 1. Recommendations It is recommended this report be received for information. 2. Purpose This report provides Council with 2017 York Region Transit (YRT) ridership and overall system performance information. 3. Background Transit measures service performance in a number of ways. Revenue and operating data is generated through a variety of software that is gathered into a business intelligence system. Reports are generated and used by staff to monitor system-wide performance, as well as making operational and financial decisions. Staff also monitors service in real-time to manage the day-to-day operation. The most common service performance measures used by the transit industry include: Committee of the Whole 1 Transportation Services March 1, 2018 2017 Transit System Performance Update • Revenue ridership - the number of paying travellers using the service. • Net cost per passenger – net cost to operate a route divided by the number of travellers • On-time performance – the reliability of the service provided to the traveller. This is a key indicator for the overall success of the Operation and Maintenance contracts • Revenue-to-cost ratio – revenue collected through transit fares compared to the cost to operate service 4.
    [Show full text]