Approaching Economic Growth and Sustainable Communities in Context of Mining in Nunavut

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Approaching Economic Growth and Sustainable Communities in Context of Mining in Nunavut Mining a Better Future: Approaching Economic Growth and Sustainable Communities in Context of Mining in Nunavut by Nadav Goelman B.A. (Professional Communications), Royal Roads University, 2010 Capstone Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Public Policy in the School of Public Policy Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences © Nadav Goelman 2014 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Spring 2014 Approval Name: Nadav Goelman Degree: Master of Public Policy Title of Thesis: Mining a Better Future: Approaching Economic Growth and Sustainable Communities in Context of Mining in Nunavut Examining Committee: Chair: Dominique M. Gross Professor, School of Public Policy, SFU Nancy Olewiler Senior Supervisor Professor Doug McArthur Supervisor Professor Maureen Maloney Internal Examiner Professor School of Public Policy Date Defended/Approved: March 5, 2014 ii Partial Copyright Licence iii Ethics Statement iv Abstract Resource development near isolated communities in Nunavut exacerbates preexisting social problems that are insufficiently ameliorated by the policy frameworks addressing them. Data from Baker Lake shows rising crime rates correlating with the mine’s arrival; and failure to ameliorate stagnant, declining education outcomes. The current framework of policy is comprised of loosely coordinated efforts by the federal and territorial governments. Supplemental community-driven research was found to identify additional interventions that garner renewed local support and heightened efficacy. Economic modeling of estimated costs and benefits of these interventions within three alternatives: a local, regional, or territorial rollout, revealed plausible net benefits at various discount rates. Additional qualitative evidence of pros and cons for each alternative supported recommendation of up to three local pilot project(s) to assess efficacy of these interventions to mitigate, ameliorate, and prevent the negative side effects of resource development in Nunavut, and remove barriers to equitable sustainable economic growth. Keywords: Nunavut; Economics; Communities; Sustainability; Mining; Education v Acknowledgements I want to acknowledge all those who helped me complete this study. In particular I thank Dr. Nancy Olewiler, my Senior Supervisor, without whom I would never have started, let alone finished, this project. I thank my incredible parents Hillel and Sheryl, my older brother Zachary, and my beautiful fiancé Sylvia, who stood by me throughout my work, when I was at my best, and also when I was at my worst. Of course I had numerous advisors and editors who played vital roles in my efforts who I would like to acknowledge. These include my Capstone research group: Jonathan Arnold, Chelsea Notte, Joyce Yuan, Nermine Tawfik, Katie Schilt, and Brittany Barker; Mr. Matthew Spence, Director General – Northern Projects Management Office: Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency; Dr. Greg Finnegan, Socio-Economic Assessment Specialist; Mr. Tom Hoefer, Executive Director – NWT & Nunavut Chamber of Mines; Mr. Larry Campbell, Corporate Director of Sustainable Development – Agnico- Eagle Mines; All of my informants, interviewees, and various data providers that facilitated my analysis; and Vancouver’s many coffee shops that contributed to my overall wellbeing throughout this immense undertaking. I would also like to thank the Social Science and Humanities Research Council for funding my research with a Joseph-Armand Bombardier Canada Graduate Scholarship. vi Table of Contents Approval ............................................................................................................................. ii Partial Copyright Licence .................................................................................................. iii Ethics Statement ............................................................................................................... iv Abstract .............................................................................................................................. v Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................... vi Table of Contents .............................................................................................................. vi List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... ix List of Figures .................................................................................................................... x Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... xi Chapter 1. Introduction: Setting the Precedent ......................................................... 1 1.1. The Policy Problem ................................................................................................ 12 1.2. Research Objective ................................................................................................ 13 1.3. Capstone Overview: Rationale & Terminology ...................................................... 13 Chapter 2. Policy Context: Surveying the Terrain ................................................... 15 2.1. The Magnitude of Mining in Nunavut ..................................................................... 15 2.2. Marginal Costs and the Investment Climate in Nunavut ........................................ 18 2.3. Building Human Capital in the Inuit Labour Force ................................................. 19 Chapter 3. Policy Makers & Stakeholders ................................................................ 21 3.1. Federal Jurisdiction ................................................................................................ 21 3.2. Territorial Jurisdiction ............................................................................................. 23 3.3. Municipal Jurisdiction ............................................................................................. 25 3.4. Regional & Aboriginal Interests .............................................................................. 26 Chapter 4. Research Methodology ............................................................................ 29 4.1. Interviews, Conversations & Conferences ............................................................. 29 4.2. Framework Gap Analysis through Literature ......................................................... 30 4.3. Benefit-Cost Economic Modelling .......................................................................... 30 Chapter 5. Framework Gap Analysis ........................................................................ 32 5.1. Elements of the Gap: Sorting out the Pieces ......................................................... 32 5.2. A Community-Driven Supplementary Framework .................................................. 39 5.3. Progress & Opportunities as Described in Baker Lake .......................................... 40 vii Chapter 6. Creating Framework Portfolios ............................................................... 51 6.1. Screening and Prioritizing Portfolio Options .......................................................... 51 6.2. Assembling and Costing the Portfolios .................................................................. 52 6.3. Forecasting Benefits of the Portfolios .................................................................... 54 Chapter 7. Criteria and Measures .............................................................................. 62 7.1. Criteria ................................................................................................................... 62 7.2. Measures ............................................................................................................... 63 Chapter 8. Policy Alternatives: Small to Large ........................................................ 64 8.1. Alternative One: The Pilot Project .......................................................................... 65 8.2. Alternative Two: The Regional Investment ............................................................ 66 8.3. Alternative Three: The Territorial Approach ........................................................... 68 Chapter 9. Recommendations ................................................................................... 71 9.1. Fixing Windows ...................................................................................................... 71 9.2. Selecting from the Alternatives .............................................................................. 71 Chapter 10. Conclusion ................................................................................................ 77 10.1. Future Research .................................................................................................... 79 Chapter 11. Limitations & Qualifications .................................................................... 81 Chapter 12. About the Author ...................................................................................... 81 Bibliography .................................................................................................................. 85 Appendix A. Mines and Potential Mines in Nunavut .................................................. 98 Appendix B. Adult Workshop, Seminar, and School Curriculum Content Needed.. .............................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Caribou (Barren-Ground Population) Rangifer Tarandus
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Caribou Rangifer tarandus Barren-ground population in Canada THREATENED 2016 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2016. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Caribou Rangifer tarandus, Barren-ground population, in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xiii + 123 pp. (http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=en&n=24F7211B-1). Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Anne Gunn, Kim Poole, and Don Russell for writing the status report on Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), Barren-ground population, in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Justina Ray, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Terrestrial Mammals Specialist Subcommittee, with the support of the members of the Terrestrial Mammals Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment and Climate Change Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-938-4125 Fax: 819-938-3984 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur le Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), population de la toundra, au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Caribou — Photo by A. Gunn. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2016. Catalogue No. CW69-14/746-2017E-PDF ISBN 978-0-660-07782-6 COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – November 2016 Common name Caribou - Barren-ground population Scientific name Rangifer tarandus Status Threatened Reason for designation Members of this population give birth on the open arctic tundra, and most subpopulations (herds) winter in vast subarctic forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Nunavut Land Use Plan
    Draft Nunavut Land Use Plan Options and Recommendations Draft – 2014 Contents Introduction .............................................................................. 3 Aerodromes ................................................................................ 75 Purpose ........................................................................................... 3 DND Establishments ............................................................... 76 Guiding Policies, Objectives and Goals ............................... 3 North Warning System Sites................................................ 76 Considered Information ............................................................ 3 Encouraging Sustainable Economic Development ..... 77 Decision making framework .................................................... 4 Mineral Potential ...................................................................... 77 General Options Considered .................................................... 4 Oil and Gas Exploration .......................................................... 78 Protecting and Sustaining the Environment .................. 5 Commercial Fisheries .............................................................. 78 Key Migratory Bird Habitat Sites .......................................... 5 Mixed Use ............................................................................... 80 Caribou Habitat ......................................................................... 41 Mixed Use ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mining, Mineral Exploration and Geoscience Contents
    Overview 2020 Nunavut Mining, Mineral Exploration and Geoscience Contents 3 Land Tenure in Nunavut 30 Base Metals 6 Government of Canada 31 Diamonds 10 Government of Nunavut 3 2 Gold 16 Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated 4 4 Iron 2 0 Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office 4 6 Inactive projects 2 4 Kitikmeot Region 4 9 Glossary 2 6 Kivalliq Region 50 Guide to Abbreviations 2 8 Qikiqtani Region 51 Index About Nunavut: Mining, Mineral Exploration and by the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA), the regulatory Geoscience Overview 2020 body which oversees stock market and investment practices, and is intended to ensure that misleading, erroneous, or This publication is a combined effort of four partners: fraudulent information relating to mineral properties is not Crown‑Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada published and promoted to investors on the stock exchanges (CIRNAC), Government of Nunavut (GN), Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated (NTI), and Canada‑Nunavut Geoscience Office overseen by the CSA. Resource estimates reported by mineral (CNGO). The intent is to capture information on exploration and exploration companies that are listed on Canadian stock mining activities in 2020 and to make this information available exchanges must be NI 43‑101 compliant. to the public and industry stakeholders. We thank the many contributors who submitted data and Acknowledgements photos for this edition. Prospectors and mining companies are This publication was written by the Mineral Resources Division welcome to submit information on their programs and photos at CIRNAC’s Nunavut Regional Office (Matthew Senkow, for inclusion in next year’s publication. Feedback and comments Alia Bigio, Samuel de Beer, Yann Bureau, Cedric Mayer, and are always appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Experiences of Mining in Baker Lake, Nunavut
    Community Experiences of Mining in Baker Lake, Nunavut by Kelsey Peterson A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Geography Guelph, Ontario, Canada ©Kelsey Peterson, April, 2012 ABSTRACT COMMUNITY EXPERIENCES OF MINING IN BAKER LAKE, NUNAVUT Kelsey Peterson Advisor: University of Guelph, 2012 Professor Ben Bradshaw With recent increases in mineral prices, the Canadian Arctic has experienced a dramatic upswing in mining development. With the development of the Meadowbank gold mine, the nearby Hamlet of Baker Lake, Nunavut is experiencing these changes firsthand. In response to an invitation from the Hamlet of Baker Lake, this research document residents’ experiences with the Meadowbank mine. These experiences are not felt homogeneously across the community; indeed, residents’ experiences with mining have been mixed. Beyond this core finding, the research suggests four further notable insights: employment has provided the opportunity for people to elevate themselves out of welfare/social assistance; education has become more common, but some students are leaving high school to pursue mine work; and local businesses are benefiting from mining contracts, but this is limited to those companies pre-existing the mine. Finally, varied individual experiences are in part generated by an individual’s context including personal context and choices. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not have been possible without the support and assistance of several key people. My advisor, Ben Bradshaw, has been instrumental in all stages of pre- research, research and writing. From accepting me to the program and connecting me to Baker Lake to funding my research and reading innumerable drafts of the written thesis, Professor Bradshaw has been critical to this research project.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Nunavut News
    Tracking Latest News progress on NWT - NUNAVUT on Northern Exploration Baffinland IBA Projects 2019 QXQDYXWQHZV photo courtesy of Agnico Eagle photo courtesy of the Department Infrastructure Residents gather in Rankin Inlet for a donation event sponsored by Agnico Eagle in June. The mining company gave away $1 million to aid literacy and firefighting. 2 November 18, 2019 November 18, 2019 3 NWT/NUNAVUT MINING How much more should mines give the North? Many factors to consider when assessing whether Northern mines are truly on solid ground SKRWRFRXUWHV\RI'RPLQLRQ'LDPRQG0LQHV The Ekati diamond mine, 300 km northeast of Yellowknife, has been in production since 1998. Residents of the NWT are still waiting to hear whether owner Dominion Diamond Mines will proceed with the Jay project. by Derek Neary claims organization Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. (NTI) to assist in national miner has repeatedly referred to Nunavut as a "politic- 1RUWKHUQ1HZV6HUYLFHV housing. NTI takes in royalty payments from mining compan- ally attractive and stable jurisdiction with enormous geological NWT/Nunavut ies and has a trust fund approaching $2 billion. NTI's president potential" that has "the ability to generate strong gold produc- The North's mining industry has injected an enormous sum declined to discuss the matter when Nunavut News broached it. tion and cash flows over several decades." into the economies of the NWT and Nunavut. Netser has also made it clear that the mining industry must In the Baffin region, the Qikiqtani Inuit Association (QIA) There's no doubt about that. play a key role in the housing crisis, although he's stopped short extracted greater benefits from Baffinland Iron Mines through Notwithstanding, one area of debate remains whether the of imploring mining companies to construct new homes for the renegotiation of its Inuit Impact Benefit Agreement last year.
    [Show full text]
  • MINERAL EXPLORATION, MINING and GEOSCIENCE OVERVIEW 2012 Table of Contents
    NUNAVUTMINERAL EXPLORATION, MINING AND GEOSCIENCE OVERVIEW 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Land Tenure in Nunavut ........................ 3 ABOUT THE NUNAVUT: MINING, MINERAL EXPLORATION AND GEOSCIENCE OVERVIEW 2012 Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada ... 4 Government of Nunavut ........................ 6 This exploration overview is a combined effort of four partners: Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada (AANDC), Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated ................. 11 Government of Nunavut (GN), Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office ............... 13 (NTI) and Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office (CNGO). The intent of this publication is to capture information on exploration and NWT & Nunavut Chamber of Mines ............... 16 mining activities in 2012 and to make this information available Summary of 2012 Exploration Activities to the public. Kitikmeot Region......................... 18 We thank the many contributors who submitted data and photos Base Metals ......................... 20 for this edition. Prospectors and mining companies are welcome to submit information on their programs for inclusion in the next Diamonds . 23 Overview. Feedback and comments are appreciated. Gold ............................... 24 Inactive Projects ...................... 30 NOTE TO READERS Kivalliq Region .......................... 32 This document has been prepared on the basis of information Base Metals ......................... 34 available at the time of writing. All resource and reserve figures Diamonds .
    [Show full text]
  • RICK A.W. HOOS, R.P. Bio. Principal Consultant - Mining Practice
    RICK A.W. HOOS, R.P. Bio. Principal Consultant - Mining Practice EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Education: Mr. Hoos has more than 35 years of professional environmental, socioeconomic M.Sc., Oceanography/ Marine and major project management experience in the mining, oil and gas, pipeline Biology, University of Victoria industries, and with the Government of Canada. He has managed or B.Sc., Biology/Geography, participated in multi-disciplinary teams working on numerous major projects, University of Calgary particularly in Canada, the United States, and in Latin America. Through this involvement, he has become familiar with the regulatory requirements and Affiliations: expectations of many countries and with the international financial community. Adjunct Professor of Natural Resources Management, PROFESSIONAL RECORD Simon Fraser University (1984 – Present) 2000/Present Principal Consultant, Mining and Environmental Practices Member, Society of Petroleum EBA, A Tetra Tech Company Industry Biologists Vancouver, BC Member, Association of 1997/2000 Vice President, Environmental Services Professional Biologists Rescan Environmental Services Ltd. Member, Comité Arctique Vancouver, BC Internationale 1995/1997 Manager, Environmental Services and Director, Latin American Member, American Society of Projects Mechanical Engineers (OMAE) Bovar Environmental Member, College of Applied Calgary, Alberta Biology, British Columbia 1979/1995 Director of Environmental and Socio-Economic Services Other Professional TransCanada PipeLines - Polar Gas (Mackenzie Valley Gas
    [Show full text]
  • Kivalliq Region
    OVERVIEW 2017 NUNAVUT MINERAL EXPLORATION, MINING & GEOSCIENCE n KIVALLIQL REGION son Fury and Hecla Strait Peninsula Igloolik Taloyoak King Hall Beach Cambridge Bay Victoria Strait William Rasmussen Island Prin Gjoa Haven Cha Basin Kugaaruk MELVILLE Is Queen Maud GulfStoris Passage Committee E Wales I. a Bay PENINSULA o FOXE Queen Maud Gulf BASIN C MBS Kitikmeot Naujaat 207 Naujaat F River Ukkusiksalik NP Foxe Channel Wager Bay Back 4 Amaruq Beverly CPMA 301 Nanuq 210 302 Meadow River Meadowbank Mine 329 C AberdeenWhite Hills SOUTHAMPTON Coral Harbour Thelon WS Lake 318 Greyhound Kivalliq ISLAND St. Tropez 504 319 East Bay MBS Baker Lake 503 Harry Kiggavik Roes Welcome Sound Baker Lake Cone Hill Gibbons 312 MBS River Gibson MacQuoid 317 209 Luxx Parker Lake 314 Chesterfield Inlet Fox Lake 313 Kuulu Dubawnt 205 Kahuna Coats River 315 328 Lake 6 Peter Lake Ma Ferguson Lake 330 Meliadine Island 601 Qamanirjuaq Is Angilak CPMA Rankin Inlet 501 Yathkyed Lake 332 334 Pistol Bay Kazan Quartzite Dubawnt Whale Cove North Henik Yandle Lake333 Noomut 331 South Henik LEGEND Lake Commodity (Number of Properties) Hard Cash Arviat Diamonds, Active (3) Diamonds, Inactive (2) 322 323 Gold, Active (18) Uranium, Inactive (2) Nigel Thlewiaza River Uranium, Active (1) Ni Cu PGE, Inactive (1) McConnell River MBS Kiyuk Mine, Active (1) 327 Areas with Surface and/or Subsurface Restrictions CPMA Caribou Protection Measures Apply MBS Migratory Bird Sanctuary NP National Park NWA National Wildlife Area HUDSONTP Te rritorial Park BAY WP Wildlife Preserve WS Wildlife
    [Show full text]
  • Exploration Overview 2009
    2373_01_00_Layout 1 07/01/10 9:17 PM Page 1 2373_01_00_Layout 1 07/01/10 9:29 PM Page 2 (Above) Qikiqtarjuaq, August 2009 COURTESY OF GN-EDT Contents: Acknowledgements Land Tenure in Nunavut........................................................................................................3 The 2009 Exploration Overview Indian and Northern Affairs Canada....................................................................................4 was written by Karen Costello (INAC), Andrew Fagan Government of Nunavut........................................................................................................6 (consultant) and Linda Ham (INAC) with contributions from Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. ........................................................................................................8 Don James (CNGO), Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office ...................................................................................10 Keith Morrison (NTI) and Eric Prosh (GN). Summary of 2009 Exploration Activities Front cover photo: Kitikmeot Region .........................................................................................................20 Installation of power plants, Kivalliq Region .............................................................................................................41 Meadowbank Mine COURTESY OF AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED Qikiqtaaluk/Baffin Region...........................................................................................61 Back cover photo: Index .....................................................................................................................................75
    [Show full text]
  • Intervention from FRMC
    Fort Resolution Métis Council 1 August, 2019 INTERVENTION REPORT MVEIRB File No EA1819-01. Diavik Diamond Mine - Processed Kimberlite to Mine Workings 1 Table of Contents Summary and Recommendations ................................................................................................. 4 Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................. 8 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 9 1.1 Organization of the Intervention Report ............................................................................ 9 1.2 Fort Resolution Métis Council ........................................................................................... 10 2.0 Caribou ................................................................................................................................... 11 2.1 Project-Specific And Cumulative Impacts On Caribou ...................................................... 11 2.1.1 Issue Statement ........................................................................................................... 11 2.1.2 DDMI’s Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 11 2.1.3 FRMC’s Conclusions ..................................................................................................... 11 2.1.4 Evidence and Rationale ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nunavut Welcomes It's Newest Mine!
    FACES IN MINING: THE BEST EMPLOYEES • AGNICO EAGLE GETS THE NIRB NOD & NEW BOSS AN OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE NWT & NUNAVUT CHAMBER OF MINES • SPRING 2015 Your tax dollars at work Ottawa finds more money for mineral mapping Arviat mine training A productive training partnership shows success Conference Board Northern mining update Northern mining We like it, we Baffinland really like it! Nunavut welcomes it’s newest mine! PHOTO COURTESY BAFFINLAND IRON MINES VOLUME 19 • SPRNG 2015 ON THE COVER: THE BAFFINLAND MINING CAMP AT MARY RIVER, WITH DEPOSIT #1 IN THE BACKGROUND. BOARD OF DIRECTORS (2014-2015) NWT DIRECTORS PRESIDENT Rod Brown | Discovery Mining Services Ltd. Brooke Clements | Peregrine Exploration PO Box 2248 201-1250 Homer Street Yellowknife, NT X1A 2P7 Vancouver, BC V6B 1C6 Phone: 867-920-4600 P: 604-408-8880 F: 604-408-8881 Fax: 867-873-8332 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] President’s Message VICE-PRESIDENT, NUNAVUT Joe Campbell | TerraX Minerals Inc. John Laitin | Sabina Gold & Silver Corp. 312 - 10 Green St. The mining industry in the NWT and Nunavut has the potential to create a 202-930 West 1st St Ottawa, ON K2J 3Z6 prosperous future. To get there, we’re focused on improvements. P4 Vancouver, BC V7P 3N4 Phone: 613-843-8109 P: 604-998-4175 F: 604-998-1051 Fax: 613-843-8110 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] DEPARTMENTS SECRETARY Lane Dewar | Cassidy Point Exploration Services PO Box 1059 Don Bubar | Avalon Rare Metals Inc. Yellowknife, NT X1A 2N8 News Portal 1901-130 Adelaide St W Phone: 867-873-1871 Government mining support; Kiggavik hearings; Fraser Institute survey; Toronto, ON M5H 3P5 E-mail: [email protected] P: 416-364-4935 F: 416-364-5162 Baffinland; Agnico Eagle; Fednav.P6 E-mail: [email protected] Roy Erasmus Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Mary River Project: Impacts and Benefits
    Assessment of the Mary River Project: Impacts and Benefits By Dr John Loxley, FRSC, Department of Economics, University of Manitoba February 2019 Assessment of the Mary River Project Inuit Impact and Benefit Agreement Dr John Loxley, FRSC, Department of Economics, University of Manitoba1 Contents Executive Summary 3 A. Looking Backwards 7 1. Background to the Mary River Project 7 2. The Price of Iron Ore and Changing Output Goals 9 3. Forecasts of the Financial Viability of the Mary River Project 10 4. Inuit, the Environment and the Mary River Project 14 5. The Inuit Impact and Benefit Agreement 15 6. The Benefits Received by Inuit from Baffinland 17 7. The Minimum Inuit Employment Goals (MIEGs) 19 8. Failure to Meet MIEGs and Other Goals 19 9. Barriers to Employment 24 10. The Mary River IIBA Renegotiation 25 11. The Significance of Financial Benefits to Families and Communities 26 12. Meeting Indigenous Employment Targets and Delivering Other Benefits: Lessons from Other Resource Projects 27 Pilbara Mine, Australia 27 Voisey’s Bay, Newfoundland and Labrador 29 Diavik Diamond Mine, Northwest Territories 31 Agnico Eagle Mines, Nunavut 33 13. What Can We Learn from These Experiences? 35 B. Looking Forward: Medium Term 38 14. Forcing Employment and Other Goals by Regulating the Expansion of Output 38 15. A Financial Transfer Alternative to Employment Growth? A Dual Economy? 41 C. Looking Forward: Long Term 44 16. Implications for the Environment of 30 MT/a Output and Two Sea Outlets 46 17. Conclusion and a Recommended Way Forward 47 Bibliography 48 Appendix 1. Nunavut Institutions and Their Functions 55 1 The research assistance of Ms Elisabet Rodriguez Llorian is gratefully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]