Kivalliq Region
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Caribou (Barren-Ground Population) Rangifer Tarandus
COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Caribou Rangifer tarandus Barren-ground population in Canada THREATENED 2016 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2016. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Caribou Rangifer tarandus, Barren-ground population, in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xiii + 123 pp. (http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=en&n=24F7211B-1). Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Anne Gunn, Kim Poole, and Don Russell for writing the status report on Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), Barren-ground population, in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Justina Ray, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Terrestrial Mammals Specialist Subcommittee, with the support of the members of the Terrestrial Mammals Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment and Climate Change Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-938-4125 Fax: 819-938-3984 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur le Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), population de la toundra, au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Caribou — Photo by A. Gunn. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2016. Catalogue No. CW69-14/746-2017E-PDF ISBN 978-0-660-07782-6 COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – November 2016 Common name Caribou - Barren-ground population Scientific name Rangifer tarandus Status Threatened Reason for designation Members of this population give birth on the open arctic tundra, and most subpopulations (herds) winter in vast subarctic forests. -
198 13. Repulse Bay. This Is an Important Summer Area for Seals
198 13. Repulse Bay. This is an important summer area for seals (Canadian Wildlife Service 1972) and a primary seal-hunting area for Repulse Bay. 14. Roes Welcome Sound. This is an important concentration area for ringed seals and an important hunting area for Repulse Bay. Marine traffic, materials staging, and construction of the crossing could displace seals or degrade their habitat. 15. Southampton-Coats Island. The southern coastal area of Southampton Island is an important concentration area for ringed seals and is the primary ringed and bearded seal hunting area for the Coral Harbour Inuit. Fisher and Evans Straits and all coasts of Coats Island are important seal-hunting areas in late summer and early fall. Marine traffic, materials staging, and construction of the crossing could displace seals or degrade their habitat. 16.7.2 Communities Affected Communities that could be affected by impacts on seal populations are Resolute and, to a lesser degree, Spence Bay, Chesterfield Inlet, and Gjoa Haven. Effects on Arctic Bay would be minor. Coral Harbour and Repulse Bay could be affected if the Quebec route were chosen. Seal meat makes up the most important part of the diet in Resolute, Spence Bay, Coral Harbour, Repulse Bay, and Arctic Bay. It is a secondary, but still important food in Chesterfield Inlet and Gjoa Haven. Seal skins are an important source of income for Spence Bay, Resolute, Coral Harbour, Repulse Bay, and Arctic Bay and a less important income source for Chesterfield Inlet and Gjoa Haven. 16.7.3 Data Gaps Major data gaps concerning impacts on seal populations are: 1. -
Approaching Economic Growth and Sustainable Communities in Context of Mining in Nunavut
Mining a Better Future: Approaching Economic Growth and Sustainable Communities in Context of Mining in Nunavut by Nadav Goelman B.A. (Professional Communications), Royal Roads University, 2010 Capstone Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Public Policy in the School of Public Policy Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences © Nadav Goelman 2014 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Spring 2014 Approval Name: Nadav Goelman Degree: Master of Public Policy Title of Thesis: Mining a Better Future: Approaching Economic Growth and Sustainable Communities in Context of Mining in Nunavut Examining Committee: Chair: Dominique M. Gross Professor, School of Public Policy, SFU Nancy Olewiler Senior Supervisor Professor Doug McArthur Supervisor Professor Maureen Maloney Internal Examiner Professor School of Public Policy Date Defended/Approved: March 5, 2014 ii Partial Copyright Licence iii Ethics Statement iv Abstract Resource development near isolated communities in Nunavut exacerbates preexisting social problems that are insufficiently ameliorated by the policy frameworks addressing them. Data from Baker Lake shows rising crime rates correlating with the mine’s arrival; and failure to ameliorate stagnant, declining education outcomes. The current framework of policy is comprised of loosely coordinated efforts by the federal and territorial governments. Supplemental community-driven research was found to identify additional interventions that garner renewed local support and heightened efficacy. Economic modeling of estimated costs and benefits of these interventions within three alternatives: a local, regional, or territorial rollout, revealed plausible net benefits at various discount rates. Additional qualitative evidence of pros and cons for each alternative supported recommendation of up to three local pilot project(s) to assess efficacy of these interventions to mitigate, ameliorate, and prevent the negative side effects of resource development in Nunavut, and remove barriers to equitable sustainable economic growth. -
Draft Nunavut Land Use Plan
Draft Nunavut Land Use Plan Options and Recommendations Draft – 2014 Contents Introduction .............................................................................. 3 Aerodromes ................................................................................ 75 Purpose ........................................................................................... 3 DND Establishments ............................................................... 76 Guiding Policies, Objectives and Goals ............................... 3 North Warning System Sites................................................ 76 Considered Information ............................................................ 3 Encouraging Sustainable Economic Development ..... 77 Decision making framework .................................................... 4 Mineral Potential ...................................................................... 77 General Options Considered .................................................... 4 Oil and Gas Exploration .......................................................... 78 Protecting and Sustaining the Environment .................. 5 Commercial Fisheries .............................................................. 78 Key Migratory Bird Habitat Sites .......................................... 5 Mixed Use ............................................................................... 80 Caribou Habitat ......................................................................... 41 Mixed Use .................................................................................. -
Schedule a Nunavut Land Use Plan Land Use Designations
65°W 70°W 60°W 75°W Alert ! 80°W 51 130 60°W Schedule A 136 82°N Nunavut Land Use Plan 85°W Land Use Designations 90°W 65°W Protected Area 82°N 95°W Special Management Area 135 134 80°N Existing Transportation Corridors 70°W 100°W ARCTIC 39 Proposed Transportation Corridors OCEAN 80°N Eureka ! 133 30 Administrative Boundaries 105°W 34 Area of Equal Use and Occupancy 110°W Nunavut Settlement Area Boundary 39 49 49 Inuit Owned Lands (Surface and Subsurface including minerals) 42 Inuit Owned Lands (Surface excluding minerals) 78°N 75°W 49 78°N 49 Established Parks (Land Use Plan does not apply) 168 168 168 168 168 168 49 49 168 39 168 168 168 168 168 168 39 168 49 49 49 39 42 39 39 44 168 39 39 39 22 167 37 70 22 18 Grise Fiord 44 18 168 58 58 49 ! 44 49 37 49 104 49 49 22 58 168 22 49 167 49 49 4918 76°N M 76°N 49 18 49 ' C 73 l u 49 28 167 r e 49 58 S 49 58 t r 49 58 a 58 59 i t 167 167 58 49 49 32 49 49 58 49 49 41 31 49 58 31 49 74 167 49 49 49 49 167 167 167 49 167 49 167 B a f f i n 49 49 167 32 167 167 167 B a y 49 49 49 49 32 49 32 61 Resolute 49 32 33 85 61 ! 1649 16 61 38 16 6138 74°N 74°N nd 61 S ou ter 61 nc as 61 61 La 75°W 20 61 69 49 49 49 49 14 49 167 49 20 49 61 61 49 49 49167 14 61 24 49 49 43 49 72°N 49 43 61 43 Pond Inlet 70°W 167 167 !49 ! 111 111 O Arctic Bay u t 167 167 e 49 26 r 49 49 29 L a 49 167 167 n 29 29 d 72°N 49 F 93 60 a Clyde River s 65°W 49 ! t 167 M ' C 60 49 I c l i e n 49 49 t 167 o c 72 k Z 49 o C h n 120°W a 70°N n e n 68°N 115°W e 49 l 49 Q i k i q t a n i 23 70°N 162 10 23 49 167 123 110°W 47 156 -
Mining, Mineral Exploration and Geoscience Contents
Overview 2020 Nunavut Mining, Mineral Exploration and Geoscience Contents 3 Land Tenure in Nunavut 30 Base Metals 6 Government of Canada 31 Diamonds 10 Government of Nunavut 3 2 Gold 16 Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated 4 4 Iron 2 0 Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office 4 6 Inactive projects 2 4 Kitikmeot Region 4 9 Glossary 2 6 Kivalliq Region 50 Guide to Abbreviations 2 8 Qikiqtani Region 51 Index About Nunavut: Mining, Mineral Exploration and by the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA), the regulatory Geoscience Overview 2020 body which oversees stock market and investment practices, and is intended to ensure that misleading, erroneous, or This publication is a combined effort of four partners: fraudulent information relating to mineral properties is not Crown‑Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada published and promoted to investors on the stock exchanges (CIRNAC), Government of Nunavut (GN), Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated (NTI), and Canada‑Nunavut Geoscience Office overseen by the CSA. Resource estimates reported by mineral (CNGO). The intent is to capture information on exploration and exploration companies that are listed on Canadian stock mining activities in 2020 and to make this information available exchanges must be NI 43‑101 compliant. to the public and industry stakeholders. We thank the many contributors who submitted data and Acknowledgements photos for this edition. Prospectors and mining companies are This publication was written by the Mineral Resources Division welcome to submit information on their programs and photos at CIRNAC’s Nunavut Regional Office (Matthew Senkow, for inclusion in next year’s publication. Feedback and comments Alia Bigio, Samuel de Beer, Yann Bureau, Cedric Mayer, and are always appreciated. -
Community Experiences of Mining in Baker Lake, Nunavut
Community Experiences of Mining in Baker Lake, Nunavut by Kelsey Peterson A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Geography Guelph, Ontario, Canada ©Kelsey Peterson, April, 2012 ABSTRACT COMMUNITY EXPERIENCES OF MINING IN BAKER LAKE, NUNAVUT Kelsey Peterson Advisor: University of Guelph, 2012 Professor Ben Bradshaw With recent increases in mineral prices, the Canadian Arctic has experienced a dramatic upswing in mining development. With the development of the Meadowbank gold mine, the nearby Hamlet of Baker Lake, Nunavut is experiencing these changes firsthand. In response to an invitation from the Hamlet of Baker Lake, this research document residents’ experiences with the Meadowbank mine. These experiences are not felt homogeneously across the community; indeed, residents’ experiences with mining have been mixed. Beyond this core finding, the research suggests four further notable insights: employment has provided the opportunity for people to elevate themselves out of welfare/social assistance; education has become more common, but some students are leaving high school to pursue mine work; and local businesses are benefiting from mining contracts, but this is limited to those companies pre-existing the mine. Finally, varied individual experiences are in part generated by an individual’s context including personal context and choices. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not have been possible without the support and assistance of several key people. My advisor, Ben Bradshaw, has been instrumental in all stages of pre- research, research and writing. From accepting me to the program and connecting me to Baker Lake to funding my research and reading innumerable drafts of the written thesis, Professor Bradshaw has been critical to this research project. -
An Overview of the Hudson Bay Marine Ecosystem
10–1 10.0 BIRDS Chapter Contents 10.1 F. GAVIIDAE: Loons .............................................................................................................................................10–2 10.2 F. PODICIPEDIDAE: Grebes ................................................................................................................................10–3 10.3 F. PROCELLARIIDAE: Fulmars...........................................................................................................................10–3 10.4 F. HYDROBATIDAE: Storm-petrels......................................................................................................................10–3 10.5 F. PELECANIDAE: Pelicans .................................................................................................................................10–3 10.6 F. SULIDAE: Gannets ...........................................................................................................................................10–4 10.7 F. PHALACROCORACIDAE: Cormorants............................................................................................................10–4 10.8 F. ARDEIDAE: Herons and Bitterns......................................................................................................................10–4 10.9 F. ANATIDAE: Geese, Swans, and Ducks ...........................................................................................................10–4 10.9.1 Geese............................................................................................................................................................10–5 -
Iqaluit, 2005
NUNAVUT WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT BOARD MINUTES: MEETING No. 41 IQALUIT, 5 – 7 APRIL 2005 Members and Staff Participating: Harry Flaherty A/Chairperson Nick Amautinuar Member Robert Moshenko Member Kevin McCormick Member Paul Pemik Member Joannie Ikkidluak Member Abraham Kaunak Member Joe Tigullaraq Chief Executive Officer Jim Noble Chief Operating Officer Joseé Galipeau A/Director of Wildlife Tom Demcheson Director of Finance and Administration Michael d’Eςa NWMB Legal Advisor Evie Amagoalik Interpreter Mary Nashook Interpreter Not Available: DIAND Appointee Vacant Other Participants at Various Times: Bert Dean Associate Director, NTI Gabriel Nirlungayuk Director of Wildlife, NTI Dr. John Cooley A/Regional Director, Northern Region, DFO Michelle Wheatley Director, Eastern Arctic Area Martin Giangioppi Fisheries Management Technician Derrick Moggy Habitat Biologist, DFO Iqaluit Tania Gordanier Habitat Biologist, DFO Iqaluit Rick Rudolph Impact Assessment Biologist Mitch Taylor Manager of Wildlife Research, DoE Mike Ferguson Regional Biologist, DoE Siu-Ling Han Section Head, DOE Canada 1 1. Call to Order and Opening Preliminaries Harry Flaherty, A/Chairperson, called the 41st Regular Meeting of the NWMB to order at 9:00 a.m. Abraham Kaunak led the opening prayer. 2. Agenda for Regular Meeting No. 41 The Board decided (Resolution 2005-017) to accept the agenda for Meeting 41 as presented. 3. Minutes: Review and Approval Minutes for all meetings were deferred to the next meeting 4. Financial and Administrative Business 4.A Variance Report for Year Ending March 31/05 This item was deferred to a later Conference Call. 5. Chairperson, Senior Staff, Advisors’ and Members’ Reports Members were advised that these reports were available for review in the binder. -
Qikiqtani Region
OVERVIEW 2018 Mineral Exploration, NUNAVUT Mining and Geoscience QIKIQTANI REGION AR CT IC LEGEND O Commodity (Number of Properties) OC CE ÉAN AN AR Base Metals, Active (2) Mine, Active (1) Diamonds, Active (2) CT Mine, Inactive (2) IQ NP Gold, Active (1) U aq E irpa ttin Qu Areas with Surface and/or Subsurface Restrictions S CPMA Caribou Protection Measures Apply t D i MBS Migratory Bird Sanctuary N H a r NP National Park T t A NWA National Wildlife Area E S L S B s TP Territorial Park I e D A r WP Wildlife Preserve S a H I N WS Wildlife Sanctuary L N A T É L E - N Inuit Owned Lands (Fee simple title) B a N ) E n E Surface Only A s ER E K Z N en SM t I I ELLE O a R Surface and Subsurface L E S R a o D A E R u N n n SLA G Geological Mapping Programs d I z ne / u A assi Ka EM N L Ag sin D N Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office E ap Ba N t N E Ice C li A U E A l D Boundaries Q D L a 1 a / NLCA Nunavut Settlement Area ES EN al K ÎL E K R Nunavut Regions A NILCA 2 Nunavik Settlement Area P Müller R ea Ice Cap G M Provincial / Territorial ry AXEL C h EN a BERG Transportation Routes n HEI D n ÎLE ( e l AND E Milne Inlet Tote Road / Proposed Rail Line ISL SMER 'ELLE Proposed Steensby Inlet Rail Line d D 1 n NLCA The Nunavut Land Claims Agreement M s 2 u ale NILCA The Nunavik Inuit Land Claims Agreement a o f W o s S ce s in H ey Pr ld Pr Ellef Rin a fie inc gnes a Ice e S Gu s Amund o ek staf Islan s r A d e u dol u f l n Ringnes d E Sea S o u Island n d Bay Norwegian °N S 70 AND SL Strait I Hazen Belcher C Y hannel RR PA B y P a en rd k m ! io -
2019 Nunavut News
Tracking Latest News progress on NWT - NUNAVUT on Northern Exploration Baffinland IBA Projects 2019 QXQDYXWQHZV photo courtesy of Agnico Eagle photo courtesy of the Department Infrastructure Residents gather in Rankin Inlet for a donation event sponsored by Agnico Eagle in June. The mining company gave away $1 million to aid literacy and firefighting. 2 November 18, 2019 November 18, 2019 3 NWT/NUNAVUT MINING How much more should mines give the North? Many factors to consider when assessing whether Northern mines are truly on solid ground SKRWRFRXUWHV\RI'RPLQLRQ'LDPRQG0LQHV The Ekati diamond mine, 300 km northeast of Yellowknife, has been in production since 1998. Residents of the NWT are still waiting to hear whether owner Dominion Diamond Mines will proceed with the Jay project. by Derek Neary claims organization Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. (NTI) to assist in national miner has repeatedly referred to Nunavut as a "politic- 1RUWKHUQ1HZV6HUYLFHV housing. NTI takes in royalty payments from mining compan- ally attractive and stable jurisdiction with enormous geological NWT/Nunavut ies and has a trust fund approaching $2 billion. NTI's president potential" that has "the ability to generate strong gold produc- The North's mining industry has injected an enormous sum declined to discuss the matter when Nunavut News broached it. tion and cash flows over several decades." into the economies of the NWT and Nunavut. Netser has also made it clear that the mining industry must In the Baffin region, the Qikiqtani Inuit Association (QIA) There's no doubt about that. play a key role in the housing crisis, although he's stopped short extracted greater benefits from Baffinland Iron Mines through Notwithstanding, one area of debate remains whether the of imploring mining companies to construct new homes for the renegotiation of its Inuit Impact Benefit Agreement last year. -
MINERAL EXPLORATION, MINING and GEOSCIENCE OVERVIEW 2012 Table of Contents
NUNAVUTMINERAL EXPLORATION, MINING AND GEOSCIENCE OVERVIEW 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Land Tenure in Nunavut ........................ 3 ABOUT THE NUNAVUT: MINING, MINERAL EXPLORATION AND GEOSCIENCE OVERVIEW 2012 Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada ... 4 Government of Nunavut ........................ 6 This exploration overview is a combined effort of four partners: Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada (AANDC), Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated ................. 11 Government of Nunavut (GN), Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office ............... 13 (NTI) and Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office (CNGO). The intent of this publication is to capture information on exploration and NWT & Nunavut Chamber of Mines ............... 16 mining activities in 2012 and to make this information available Summary of 2012 Exploration Activities to the public. Kitikmeot Region......................... 18 We thank the many contributors who submitted data and photos Base Metals ......................... 20 for this edition. Prospectors and mining companies are welcome to submit information on their programs for inclusion in the next Diamonds . 23 Overview. Feedback and comments are appreciated. Gold ............................... 24 Inactive Projects ...................... 30 NOTE TO READERS Kivalliq Region .......................... 32 This document has been prepared on the basis of information Base Metals ......................... 34 available at the time of writing. All resource and reserve figures Diamonds .