DOCSLIB.ORG

Exploration Overview 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Exploration Overview 2009 2373_01_00_Layout 1 07/01/10 9:17 PM Page 1 2373_01_00_Layout 1 07/01/10 9:29 PM Page 2 (Above) Qikiqtarjuaq, August 2009 COURTESY OF GN-EDT Contents: Acknowledgements Land Tenure in Nunavut........................................................................................................3 The 2009 Exploration Overview Indian and Northern Affairs Canada....................................................................................4 was written by Karen Costello (INAC), Andrew Fagan Government of Nunavut........................................................................................................6 (consultant) and Linda Ham (INAC) with contributions from Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. ........................................................................................................8 Don James (CNGO), Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office ...................................................................................10 Keith Morrison (NTI) and Eric Prosh (GN). Summary of 2009 Exploration Activities Front cover photo: Kitikmeot Region .........................................................................................................20 Installation of power plants, Kivalliq Region .............................................................................................................41 Meadowbank Mine COURTESY OF AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED Qikiqtaaluk/Baffin Region...........................................................................................61 Back cover photo: Index .....................................................................................................................................75 Out on the land prospecting COURTESY OF CNGO About the Nunavut: Mining, Mineral Exploration and Geoscience Overview 2009 This exploration overview is a combined effort of four partners: Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC), Government of Nunavut (GN), Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. (NTI) and Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office (CNGO). The intent of this publication is to capture information on exploration and mining activities in 2009 and to make this information available to the public. All exploration information was gathered prior to mid-November 2009. We thank the many contributors who submitted data and photos for this edition. Prospectors and mining companies are welcome to submit information on their programs for inclusion in the next Overview. Feedback is appreciated. NOTE TO READERS This document has been prepared on the basis of information available at the time of writing. All resource and reserve figures quoted in this publication are derived from company news releases, websites and technical reports filed with SEDAR (www.sedar.com). Readers are directed to individual company websites for details on the reporting standards used in each resource and reserve estimate. The authors make no warranty of any kind with respect to the content and accept no liability, either incidental, consequential, financial or otherwise, arising from the use of this document. All exploration information was gathered prior to mid-November 2009. A project’s status (active versus inactive) for INAC tracking purposes and for inclusion in this publication (both for the magazine and accompanying map) was determined by several factors, including: information publically available (e.g., corporate presentations, press releases, ftp sites such as those of the Nunavut Impact Review Board (NIRB) and the Nunavut Water Board (NWB)), active mineral tenure as shown on SidViewer, and valid Land Use Permits and Water Licenses as issued by INAC and NWB, respectively. With reference to the use of the term National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101): This is an industry standard outlining rules and guidelines for reporting and disclosing scientific and technical information about mineral projects. This standard is supervised by the Canadian Securities Administrators. 2 Table of Contents 2373_01_00_Layout 1 07/01/10 9:17 PM Page 3 Land Tenure in Nunavut The territory of Nunavut was created in April 1999 Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. (NTI). NTI issues rights to as a result of the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement explore and mine through its own mineral tenure (NLCA), the largest Aboriginal land settlement in regime. Mineral rights (mineral claims or leases) Canadian history. Spanning two million kilometres that existed at the time of the NLCA signing — (km), the territory has 25 communities and known as grandfathered rights — continue to be approximately 30,000 people. Inuit represent 85 per administered by Indian and Northern Affairs Canada cent of Nunavut’s population, creating the (INAC) until they terminate or the holder transfers foundation of the territory’s culture and values. This its interests to the NTI regime. For both surface and culture is inherently connected to the land, shaping subsurface IOL, access to the land must be obtained government, business and day-to-day life. from the appropriate RIA. In addition to the creation of the territory, the The Crown owns mineral rights to 98 per cent of NLCA gave Inuit fee simple title to 356,000 square Nunavut. INAC administers these rights through the kilometres (km 2) of land. There are 944 parcels of Northwest Territories and Nunavut Mining Regulations Inuit Owned Lands (IOL) where Inuit hold surface (NTNMRs). This includes surface IOL, for which title only (surface IOL). The Government of Canada or access to the land must be obtained from the RIAs as “the Crown” retains the mineral rights to these lands. explained above. Inuit also hold fee simple title — including mineral Significantly, the NLCA is a final settlement rights — to 150 parcels of IOL (subsurface IOL), whereby all land claims in Nunavut have been which total 38,000 km 2 and represent approximately settled with the Inuit of Nunavut, thus providing an Prospecting course, sighting claim line, two per cent of the territory. Surface title to all IOL unmatched level of land tenure certainty. Clyde River, August 2009 is held in each region by one of the three Regional For more information on the location of IOL and COURTESY OF GN-EDT Inuit Associations (RIAs) while Inuit subsurface title Crown land in the territory, take a look at the 2009 to subsurface IOL is held and administered by Nunavut Exploration and Activity Map. GUIDE TO ACRONYMS CNGO Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office KivIA Kivalliq Inuit Association DPA Development Partnership Agreements MRO Mining Recorder’s Office EA Inuit Owned Lands Mineral Exploration NGO Non-Government Organizations Agreement NIRB Nunavut Impact Review Board EDT Department of Economic Development and NLCA Nunavut Land Claims Agreement Transportation, Government of Nunavut NRCan Natural Resources Canada EIS Environmental Impact Statement NT Northwest Territories EM Electromagnetic NTI Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. GIS Geographic Information System NTNMR Northwest Territories and GN Government of Nunavut Nunavut Mining Regulations GSC Geological Survey of Canada NTS National Topographic System IIBA Inuit Impact Benefit Agreement NWB Nunavut Water Board INAC Indian and Northern Affairs Canada NWNSRTA Nunavut Waters and IOL Inuit Owned Land Nunavut Surface Rights Tribunal Act IPG Institutions of Public Government PGM Platinum Group Metals KIA Kitikmeot Inuit Association QIA Qikiqtani Inuit Association KIM Kimberlite Indicator Mineral(s) RIA Regional Inuit Association Mineral Exploration, Mining and Geoscience 2009 3 2373_01_00_Layout 1 07/01/10 9:17 PM Page 4 Indian and Northern Affairs Canada rocks, minerals and careers in the exploration and development industry. Outside the territory, INAC promotes Nunavut as a premiere location for mineral- related investment. As part of this, INAC co-manages the Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office (CNGO) with the GN, Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) and NTI. INAC has also been busy in 2009 with Crown land and water-related responsibilities, as well as inspections and enforcements. Under the Territorial Lands Act and the Nunavut Waters and Surface Rights Tribunal Act , INAC works with license, permit and lease holders — and partner organizations as required — to ensure that certain terms and conditions are met for Crown land and waters in Nunavut. In terms of land administration, INAC manages and administers surface and subsurface rights on Crown land in Nunavut. The department also ensures compliance of the Territorial Lands Act and Boulder sampling, In Nunavut, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada’s related regulations. INAC also issues land use permits, Cumberland Peninsula, Baffin Island (INAC) broad mandate encompasses the leases, quarry permits and licenses of occupation to COURTESY OF CNGO stewardship of land and natural resources, and ensure Crown land is used responsibly. In February northern governance. In partnership with the 2009, the Nunavut Region Mining Recorder’s Office Government of Nunavut (GN), Nunavut issued 122 prospecting permits (214 permits were Tunngavik Inc. (NTI), Institutions of Public issued in 2008). Government (IPGs) and other federal partners, As an intervener in the environmental assessment INAC works to meet the federal government’s and regulatory process in the past year, INAC provides constitutional, political and legal responsibilities to technical advice to the Nunavut Impact Review Board Inuit and Northerners. (NIRB) and the Nunavut Water Board (NWB). INAC does this in a number of ways. It ensures 2009 was another busy year for INAC’s work in compliance with assessment requirements under the the management of fresh water in Nunavut,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Studien Zur Siedlungs- Und Wirtschaftsentwicklung in Der Östlichen Kanadischen Zentralarktis*)
    Studien zur Siedlungs- und Wirtschaftsentwicklung in der östlichen kanadischen Zentralarktis*) Von Erhard Treude (Münster/Westf.) Mit 5 Figuren Summary: On the Development 0/ the Settlement Pattern and the Economy 0/ the Ea8tern Ganadian Gentral Arctic. Two periods of development are dealt with: 1. 1920-1950:The whalers not havingreachedthe area, the Netsilik Eskimos did not come into elose contact with Euro-Canadians until after 1920 when the fur traders invaded the country. The introduction of the rifle and the gradual acceptance of fur trapping deeply affected the traditional economy, until it finally collapsed when the fox prices broke down after World War H. - 2. 1950-1970: This period is characterized bythe abandonment of the isolated winter settlements in favour of living in the larger communities of Gjoa Raven, Spence Bay and Pelly Bay providing a wide range of services and facilities. At the same time, opportunities for wage employment were offered on a wider scale. The formation of co-operatives on the one hand and settlement councils on the other hand enabled the local people to take a more active part in their economic and political development. - In a final chapter, the present (1971) structure of the settlement pattern and the economy are described; and data are provided on the total local cash income for each of the settlements. 1. Einleitung Unter Zentralarktis wird ein Bereich verstanden, der die Inseln Victoria, King William, Prince of Wales und Somerset sowie den festländischen Küstenstreifen etwa von Tinney Point im Westen bis Cape James Anderson im Osten umfaßt (vgl. Fig. 1). Nach der häufig benutzten, von der Richtung des Seeverkehrs bestimm- ten Zweiteilung des nördlichen Kanadas in West- und Ostarktis würde es sich um die östliche Westarktis zuzüglich der beiden zur Ostarktis gerechneten Inseln Prince of Wales und Somerset handeln.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Inuit Bowhead Knowledge Study Nunavut, Canada
    english cover 11/14/01 1:13 PM Page 1 FINAL REPORT OF THE INUIT BOWHEAD KNOWLEDGE STUDY NUNAVUT, CANADA By Inuit Study Participants from: Arctic Bay, Arviat, Cape Dorset, Chesterfield Inlet, Clyde River, Coral Harbour, Grise Fiord, Hall Beach, Igloolik, Iqaluit, Kimmirut, Kugaaruk, Pangnirtung, Pond Inlet, Qikiqtarjuaq, Rankin Inlet, Repulse Bay, and Whale Cove Principal Researchers: Keith Hay (Study Coordinator) and Members of the Inuit Bowhead Knowledge Study Committee: David Aglukark (Chairperson), David Igutsaq, MARCH, 2000 Joannie Ikkidluak, Meeka Mike FINAL REPORT OF THE INUIT BOWHEAD KNOWLEDGE STUDY NUNAVUT, CANADA By Inuit Study Participants from: Arctic Bay, Arviat, Cape Dorset, Chesterfield Inlet, Clyde River, Coral Harbour, Grise Fiord, Hall Beach, Igloolik, Iqaluit, Kimmirut, Kugaaruk, Pangnirtung, Pond Inlet, Qikiqtarjuaq, Rankin Inlet, Nunavut Wildlife Management Board Repulse Bay, and Whale Cove PO Box 1379 Principal Researchers: Iqaluit, Nunavut Keith Hay (Study Coordinator) and X0A 0H0 Members of the Inuit Bowhead Knowledge Study Committee: David Aglukark (Chairperson), David Igutsaq, MARCH, 2000 Joannie Ikkidluak, Meeka Mike Cover photo: Glenn Williams/Ursus Illustration on cover, inside of cover, title page, dedication page, and used as a report motif: “Arvanniaqtut (Whale Hunters)”, sc 1986, Simeonie Kopapik, Cape Dorset Print Collection. ©Nunavut Wildlife Management Board March, 2000 Table of Contents I LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES . .i II DEDICATION . .ii III ABSTRACT . .iii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 RATIONALE AND BACKGROUND FOR THE STUDY . .1 1.2 TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE AND SCIENCE . .1 2 METHODOLOGY 3 2.1 PLANNING AND DESIGN . .3 2.2 THE STUDY AREA . .4 2.3 INTERVIEW TECHNIQUES AND THE QUESTIONNAIRE . .4 2.4 METHODS OF DATA ANALYSIS .
    [Show full text]
  • Kivia Covid 19 Response Initiative Phase 2
    KivIA Covid 19 Response Initiative Phase 2 December 8, 2020 By KIA Announcements / Inuit Programs & Services RANKIN INLET, NU – December 7, 2020 – The Kivalliq Inuit Association (KivIA) is pleased to announce the launch of the second phase of its COVID-19 initiatives for its members. Initiatives that included support for its Elders, traditional activities, and support to all its members within our communities had ended. The additional funds for KivIA’s second phase COVID-19 response plan come from additional funding from the Indigenous Community Support Fund (ICSF). The KivIA had carefully considered various options to roll out this additional funding from the federal government. The discussion led to a consensus on a plan that would… Eliminate the need to have the program become application based Allow the general public, KIA staff and Inuit to not come in contact with each other in order to carry out this program, therefore following the Public Health Measures currently in effect. Allow the Inuit in the Kivalliq communities to quickly receive the relief funds without any delay due to administrative time. Benefit local Inuit owned companies with their services Maximize the funding effectiveness with the addition of added funds from the vendor and ability for its members to add on to their dividends. Prevent any tax implications for the Inuit from the federal government in receiving this relief funding. With the above factors put into consideration, it was suggested by the Covid-19 Planning Committee that the ICS Funding would be rolled out with a partnership with the Arctic Cooperatives Limited to provide $1500 gift cards to every Inuit household in the Kivalliq Region.
    [Show full text]
  • 023810 Rangifer Spec Issue
    The Ninth North American Caribou Workshop, S7 Kuujjuaq, Québec, Canada, 23-27 April, 2001. Status, population fluctuations and ecological relationships of Peary caribou on the Queen Elizabeth Islands: Implications for their survival Frank L. Miller1 & Anne Gunn2 1 Canadian Wildlife Service, Prairie & Northern Region, Room 200, 4999 - 98th. Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T6B 2X3 Canada ([email protected]). 2 Department of Resources, Wildlife and Economic Development, Government of the Northwest Territories, Box 1320, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories X1A 3S8 Canada. Abstract: The Peary caribou (Rangifer tarandus pearyi) was recognized as 'Threatened' by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada in 1979 and 'Endangered' in 1991. It is the only member of the deer family (Cervidae) found on the Queen Elizabeth Islands (QEI) of the Canadian High Arctic. The Peary caribou is a significant part of the region's biodiversity and a socially important and economically valuable part of Arctic Canada's natural heritage. Recent microsatellite DNA findings indicate that Peary caribou on the QEI are distinct from caribou on the other Arctic Islands beyond the QEI, including Banks Island. This fact must be kept in mind if any translocation of caribou to the QEI is pro• posed. The subspecies is too gross a level at which to recognize the considerable diversity that exists between Peary cari¬ bou on the QEI and divergent caribou on other Canadian Arctic Islands. The Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada should take this considerable diversity among these caribou at below the subspecies classification to mind when assigning conservation divisions (units) to caribou on the Canadian Arctic Islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Statutory Report on Wildlife to the Nunavut Legislative Assembly Section 176 of the Wildlife Act
    Statutory Report on Wildlife to the Nunavut Legislative Assembly Section 176 of the Wildlife Act 1.0 Review of Wildlife and Habitat Management Programs for Terrestrial Species in Nunavut…………………………………………………………….1 1.1 Wildlife Act and Wildlife Regulations………………………………………………..2 1.2 Qikiqtaaluk Region……………………………………………………………………2 1.2.1 Qikiqtaaluk Research Initiatives…………………………………………………….2 a. Peary caribou………………………………………………………………………….2 b. High Arctic muskox…………………………………………………………………...3 c. North Baffin caribou…………………………………………………………………..4 1.2.2 Qikiqtaaluk Management Initiatives………………………………………………...5 a. Peary Caribou Management Plan……………………………………………………...5 b. High Arctic Muskox…………………………………………………………………..5 c. South Baffin Management Plan……………………………………………………….6 1.3 Kitikmeot Region……………………………………………………………………...8 1.3.1 Kitikmeot Research Initiatives………………………………………………………9 a. Wolverine and Grizzly bear Hair Snagging………………………………………….. 9 b. Mainland Caribou Projects……………………………………………………………9 c. Boothia Caribou Project……………………………………………………………...10 d. Dolphin and Union Caribou Project……………………............................................10 e. Mainland and Boothia Peninsula Muskoxen………………………………………...11 f. Harvest and Ecological Research Operational System (HEROS)…………………...12 g. Vegetation Mapping……………………………………………………………….....12 1.3.2 Kitikmeot Management Initiatives…………………………………………………12 a. Grizzly Bear Management…………………………………………………………...12 b. Bluenose East Management Plan…………………………………………………….12 c. DU Caribou Management Plan………………………………………………………13 d. Muskox Status
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Development Council for Alaska, Inc
    0 Box 516, Anchorage, Alaska 99510 The Alaska Miners Association is conducting two trips to the Canadian Arctic of government and industry leaders to examine first hand the viability of hard rock mining under remote Arctic conditions. AMA anticipates that the Arctic trips, scheduled for April and July, will . stimulate new ideas on what is needed to February - March 1982, spark mining activity in Interior Alaska. The seven-day identical trips are being coordinated by Ron Sheardown, a miner with extensive experience in the Canadian Arctic. Approximately 40 people can be accommodated on each trip at a total cost of $2,000 per person. Besides industry and government officials, the trips will also include February 18-19,1982 Anchorage, Alaska numerous engineers and geologists Coordinated by: familiar with Alaska's mineral potential The Resource Development Council and land development problems. the State of Alaska. Department of Commerce and The trip begins with a stop in Economic Development Whitehorse, Yukon Territory for a meet- -------------------------------------*--*--------*-----*-------------*-------------- ing with the Yukon Territorial Please rush me ____ copies ($30 each) the second Commissioner for discussion of govern- Alaska Coal Marketing Conference proceedings. ment relations and northern mine Name development. Following the meeting, the Alaska visitors fly to Pine Point Mine and Title railroad facility in the Northwest Territories. The itinerary includes stops Organization at the Giant Yellow Knife gold mines, the City Lupin Mine at Contwoyo Lake, NWT, Reseloute, the Nanisivik Mine and the State Zip Polaris Mine deep in the Canadian Arctic. Enclosed is a check made payable to the Resource For additional information on the Development Council for trips, call the Alaska Miners Association Please charge MC or VISA at 276-0347.
    [Show full text]
  • A Legacy of Excellent Service Passed Down Through Generations
    A LEGACY OF EXCELLENT SERVICE PASSED DOWN THROUGH GENERATIONS October 24, 2019 In early September, the NEAS vessel, MV Qamutik, and its crew arrived off the shores of Kugaaruk, a remote community located south of the Bay of Boothia in the eastern part of Nunavut's Kitikmeot region. This was not a routine call in Nunavut’s annual dry cargo marine resupply operations. No, this day was different for our team. This arrival on the NEAS sailing schedule was special. Members of the NEAS crew on the Qamutik that day included Norman Qavvik and Waylon Annaklik, and this was a homecoming, a celebration of NEAS welcomed Fred Qavvik once again on the MV QAMUTIK during operations family and passing down of values in Kugaaruk. From left to right: Capt. MV Qamutik, Louis-René Longchamps, through the generations. We picked Norman Qavvik, Waylon Annaklik, and Fred Qavvik. up Fred Qavvik, Waylon’s father, who joined the NEAS crew. The family enjoyed lunch on board with the Captain. “It was cheerful to have the Qavvik family visit,” said Capt. Louis-René Longchamps of the MV Qamutik. “Big thanks to the Captain and the chef for the awesome lunch,” said Fred Qavvik. “Our young ones really enjoyed the experience of visiting the ship. It was a special day for everyone.” Norman Qavvik, Fred Qavvik and Waylon Annaklik completed the NEAS marine training program at Nunavut Fisheries and Marine Training Consortium in Iqaluit in 2012, 2015 and 2019 respectively. Norman started as a Deckhand, was promoted and now serves as Wheelsman. He is also part of the Firefighter team on board.
    [Show full text]
  • Jericho Mine Site – Operation, Maintenance and Surveillance Program – 2020 Report
    JERICHO DIAMOND MINE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND SURVEILLANCE PLAN NUNAVUT IMPACT REVIEW BOARD FILE #16UN058 2020 ANNUAL REPORT December 31, 2020 This page intentionally left blank NIRB File #16UN058 – 2020 Annual Report The Proponent shall submit a comprehensive annual report to the Nunavut Impact Review Board at the end of each year of permitted activities, and before December 31st of each year. It is expected that reporting requirements under NIRB File No. 16UN058 will be coordinated with existing reporting requirements associated with INAC’s ongoing site management and monitoring functions related to the Jericho Diamond Mine Project (NIRB File No. 00MN059) as approved to proceed under Project Certificate No. 002. The Board expects to receive the first such report on or before December 31, 2017. The annual report must contain, but not limited to, the following information: a) A summary of activities undertaken for the year, including: a map and associated details pertaining to remediation activities and site operations conducted to-date; The activities that took place during the year included: o The planned freshet site visit in June was canceled due to COVID-19 and associated travel restrictions, all planned activity was completed during the fall site visit. o August 31st to September 2nd Site Visit . Mobilization via aircraft . Implementation of Year 3 of the Operation, Maintenance and Surveillance (OMS) Plan . Installed a new power control system on the remote camera system . Site Tour (CIRNAC Inspector, NIRB) . Demobilization via aircraft See Appendix A for maps of the site showing all work areas. a map detailing the locations of all fuel storage areas illustrating all containment structures, accompanied with a description of all containment measures implemented; Current fuel storage is limited to drummed fuel located within the Truck Shop Building (see Appendix A, Figure 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Movements and Habitat Use of Wolves Denning in the Central Arctic, Northwest Territories and Nunavut, Canada
    Re: Esker Habitat Studies in the Slave Geological Province: Movements and Habitat Use of Wolves Denning in the Central Arctic, Northwest Territories and Nunavut, Canada STUDY DIRECTOR RELEASE FORM The above publication is the result of a project conducted under the West Kitikmeot / Slave Study. I have reviewed the report and advise that it has fulfilled the requirements of the approved proposal and can be subjected to independent expert review and be considered for release to the public. Study Director Date INDEPENDENT EXPERT REVIEW FORM I have reviewed this publication for scientific content and scientific practices and find the report is acceptable given the specific purposes of this project and subject to the field conditions encountered. Reviewer Date INDEPENDENT EXPERT REVIEW FORM I have reviewed this publication for scientific content and scientific practices and find the report is acceptable given the specific purposes of this project and subject to the field conditions encountered. Reviewer Date Box 2572, Yellowknife, NT, X1A 2P9 Ph (867) 669-6235 Fax (867) 920-4346 e-mail: [email protected] Home Page: http://www.wkss.nt.ca BOARD RELEASE FORM The Study Board is satisfied that this final report has been reviewed for scientific content and approves it for release to the public. Chair West Kitikmeot/Slave Society Date Box 2572, Yellowknife, NT, X1A 2P9 Ph (867) 669-6235 Fax (867) 920-4346 e-mail: [email protected] Home Page: http://www.wkss.nt.ca ESKER HABITAT STUDIES in the SLAVE GEOLOGICAL PROVINCE Movements and habitat use of wolves denning in the central Arctic, Northwest Territories and Nunavut, Canada Final Report to the West Kitikmeot / Slave Study Society Yellowknife, NT Canada 07 February 2002 Submitted by: H.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiogenic Age and Isotopic Studies: Report 3
    GSCAN-P—89-2 CA9200982 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF CANADA PAPER 89-2 RADIOGENIC AGE AND ISOTOPIC STUDIES: REPORT 3 1990 Entity, Mtnat and Cnargi*, Mint* M n**ouroaa Canada ftoaioweat Canada CanadS '•if S ( >* >f->( f STAFF, GEOCHRONOLOGY SECTION: GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF CANADA Research Scientists: Otto van Breemen J. Chris Roddick Randall R. Parrish James K. Mortensen Post-Doctoral Fellows: Francis 6. Dudas Hrnst Hegncr Visiting Scientist: Mary Lou Bevier Professional Scientists: W. Dale L<neridj:e Robert W. Sullivan Patricia A. Hunt Reginald J. Theriaul! Jack L. Macrae Technical Staff: Klaus Suntowski Jean-Claude Bisson Dianne Bellerive Fred B. Quigg Rejean J.G. Segun Sample crushing and preliminary mineral separation arc done by the Mineralogy Section GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF CANADA PAPER 89-2 RADIOGENIC AGE AND ISOTOPIC STUDIES: REPORT 3 1990 ° Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1990 Available in Canada through authorized bookstore agents and other bookstores or by mail from Canadian Government Publishing Centre Supply and Services Canada Ottawa, Canada Kl A 0S9 and from Geological Survey of Canada offices: 601 Booth Street Ottawa, Canada Kl A 0E8 3303-33rd Street N.W., Calgary, Alberta T2L2A7 100 West Pender Street Vancouver, B.C. V6B 1R8 A deposit copy of this publication is also available for reference in public libraries across Canada Cat. No. M44-89/2E ISBN 0-660-13699-6 Price subject to change without notice Cover Description: Aerial photograph of the New Quebec Crater, a meteorite impact structure in northern Ungava Peninsula, Quebec, taken in 1985 by P.B. Robertson (GSC 204955 B-l). The diameter of the lake is about 3.4km and the view is towards the east-southeast.
    [Show full text]
  • Caribou (Barren-Ground Population) Rangifer Tarandus
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Caribou Rangifer tarandus Barren-ground population in Canada THREATENED 2016 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2016. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Caribou Rangifer tarandus, Barren-ground population, in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xiii + 123 pp. (http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=en&n=24F7211B-1). Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Anne Gunn, Kim Poole, and Don Russell for writing the status report on Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), Barren-ground population, in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Justina Ray, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Terrestrial Mammals Specialist Subcommittee, with the support of the members of the Terrestrial Mammals Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment and Climate Change Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-938-4125 Fax: 819-938-3984 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur le Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), population de la toundra, au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Caribou — Photo by A. Gunn. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2016. Catalogue No. CW69-14/746-2017E-PDF ISBN 978-0-660-07782-6 COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – November 2016 Common name Caribou - Barren-ground population Scientific name Rangifer tarandus Status Threatened Reason for designation Members of this population give birth on the open arctic tundra, and most subpopulations (herds) winter in vast subarctic forests.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRENT RESEARCH C Resources Natural Anada Geological Surveyofcanada C Naturelles Ressources Anada
    Geological Survey of Canada CURRENT RESEARCH 2006-G Geological Survey of Canada Radiocarbon Dates XXXV Collated by R. McNeely 2006 CURRENT RESEARCH Natural Resources Ressources naturelles Canada Canada ©Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2006 ISSN 1701-4387 Catalogue No. M44-2006/G0E-PDF ISBN 0-662-43811-6 A copy of this publication is also available for reference by depository libraries across Canada through access to the Depository Services Program's Web site at http://dsp-psd.pwgsc.gc.ca A free digital download of this publication is available from GeoPub: http://geopub.nrcan.gc.ca/index_e.php Toll-free (Canada and U.S.A.): 1-888-252-4301 Critical reviewers L. Dredge Author’s address R. McNeely Geological Survey of Canada Terrain Sciences Division 601 Booth Street Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E8 Publication approved by GSC Northern Canada Original manuscript submitted: 2005-12-15 Final version approved for publication: 2006-01-10 Correction date: All requests for permission to reproduce this work, in whole or in part, for purposes of commercial use, resale, or redistribution shall be addressed to: Earth Sciences Sector Information Division, Room 402, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E8. This date list, GSC XXXV, is the twenty-fourth to be published directly by the Geological Survey of Canada. Lists prior to GSC XII were published first in the journal Radiocarbon and were reprinted as GSC Papers. The lists through 1967 (GSC VI) were given new pagination, whereas lists VII to XI (1968 to 1971) were reprinted with the same pagination. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . 2 Acknowledgments .
    [Show full text]