Ethnobotany of the Kiluhikturmiut Inuinnait of Kugluktuk, Nunavut, Canada

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ethnobotany of the Kiluhikturmiut Inuinnait of Kugluktuk, Nunavut, Canada Research Communicaon Ethnobotany of the Kiluhikturmiut Inuinnait of Kugluktuk, Nunavut, Canada Jonathan Duffy Davis1, Sandra Anne Banack2 Author address: 1Fullerton Arboretum, California State University, Fullerton, CA 92831, 2Instute for Ethnomedicine, P.O. Box 3464, Jackson, WY 83001 Received: September 24, 2012 Volume: 3:78‐90 Published: December 29, 2012 © 2012 Society of Ethnobiology Abstract: The disparity in floral diversity between tropical and arcc regions is reflected in a paucity of ethnobotanical research among arcc cultures. The Kiluhikturmiut Inuinnait are an Inuit subpopulaon who inhabit the Kikmeot Region of the Territory of Nunavut in Canada’s Arcc. We conducted an ethnobotanical survey in the Inuinnait hamlet of Kugluktuk to document the tradional uses of plants as food, materials, and medicine. Data were gathered through unstructured interviews, parcipant observaon, purposive sampling, and voucher‐specimen collecon of all plants used. Uses were documented for 23 plant species/types contained in 14 families. Nine species/types were eaten, six species/types were used as materials, and 12 species were used for medicine. Villagers shared common knowledge of plants used for food and materials; however, knowledge of medicinal plants was restricted to a single healer. We argue that specialized knowledge such as the use of medicinal plants is important to document especially when the number individuals using this knowledge is dwindling. Abstract: Pitquhiigut piruqhimayut qauyihaivluk qanuq inuit atuqtauvagait atungauyanik niqiuvluk, hanayauvagaillu, uumingalu havaurniillu. Pitquhiit piruqhimayut ihivgiuqtauanngiuni Ukiuqtartumi avangnit. Kiluhikturmiut Inuinnait huli anguniayuktuuvluk atuqpagait ublumi. Atuqtauangiuni haffuminga Ukiuqtartup pitquhiit piruqhimayut uumingalu huli atuqaaqhuk nunamiunnit taimaa pitquhiita arlingnaqhivakhunilu haffumingat pitquhiigut piruqhimayunit qauyi‐ harnirnit. Hamna atuqtauyumayunut ihivgiuqhiyainnit nalunaitkuhiutauvluni qanurmi atuqtauvagait atungauyait ilitquhiigut niriyauvagainullu, pitquhiigut, havauturnigullu Kiluhikturmiunnut Inuinnait. Hamna pitquhiigut piruqhi‐ mayut naunaiqhiniq aqtauvakhuk Kiluhikturmiunut Inuinnait pivalliahimavluni Qurluqturmi, Nunavunmi (67º47.881’ Kangangnaa; 115º 13.845’ Uataa). Nalunaiqhiyut qqagut kavagait unipkaaliuqhuk tautukpakhugillu ilauqatauyunut. Atuqtauvluk raqhimayait 23 nik uumayuit aadjikiingningit/qanuriunik atungauyainnit. Arvinilik pingahuanik niriyauhi‐ mavluk, arvinilik atauhirmik aadjikiingningit/qanuriunik atuqtauvagaillu pitquhiigut mikhaanut, uvvalu tualunik uumayuit aadjikiingningit atuqtauvagait havaukhainnit. Key words: ethnobiology, Coronaon Gulf , Arcc, specialized knowledge Introduction clothing. Families lived in shelters made from blocks The Inuit are aboriginal people indigenous to arctic of snow and traveled by dogsled (Jenness 1916; regions. Contemporary Inuit communities are Stefánsson 1913). When the ice receded in summer, dispersed from Siberia east to Greenland. Ancestors many groups turned inland to hunt caribou on the of the Inuit are believed to have migrated across the tundra, traveling on foot and sheltering in tents of Bering Strait from northeast Asia onto North animal hide (Stefánsson 1913). America approximately 4,500 years ago. Archaeologi- cal evidence indicates that populations radiated across The Inuinnait the continent, reaching Greenland within 500 years The Inuinnait are a subpopulation of Canadian Inuit (Helgason et al. 2006). who inhabit the Kitikmeot region in Nunavut, Traditionally, the Inuit migrated across ice and Canada. The relative isolation and inaccessibility of tundra to exploit seasonally available prey popula- the central Canadian Arctic protected the Inuinnait tions. In winter, the frozen ocean provided access to from the contact with Europeans experienced much seals and other marine mammals that were hunted for earlier by Inuit groups closer to the Atlantic and their ample supplies of fat to be used for food and Pacific Oceans. Prior to the early twentieth-century, fuel, and waterproof skins for the construction of contact with non-indigenous peoples was limited to 78 Research Communicaon brief and sporadic encounters with explorers and Inuinnait have identified and retained knowledge of Royal Navy sailors (Condon 1996). After spending useful and biologically active plants for food, materi- seven months with a group of Inuinnait on Victoria als, and the treatment of disease. Island, Jenness (1916) reported the sustained use of stone-age technology and regarded the Inuinnait as Methods the only remaining Inuit group still living a traditional Kugluktuk began as the Inuinnait settlement of lifestyle. The sustained presence of European traders Coppermine. Today it is a hamlet of approximately in the Coronation Gulf region began at the beginning 1,300 people situated on the southwestern shore of of the twentieth century (Condon 1996). the Coronation Gulf in the Kitikmeot Region of The fur-trade influenced Inuinnait culture and Nunavut (67˚49.3’ N; 115˚04.8’ W). Field research had a long-lasting impact on hunting practices, was conducted in June and July of 2006 while living in economy, and migration patterns: the arctic fox was Kugluktuk. hunted for its fur which was traded for novel goods Data were gathered through daily participant such as rifles, tobacco, sugar, flour, and tea. This new observation and unstructured ethnographic inter- economy spurred settlements around trading posts views. Opportunities for participant observation (Condon 1996). The first two trading posts were included hunting and fishing trips, walks around the constructed in Coronation Gulf region in the summer periphery of town, and other excursions. Purposive of 1916. By 1963 72% of the Inuinnait population sampling methods were used as a tool to select lived in the two main settlements of Coppermine and community participants (Tongco 2007). Interviews Holman (Usher 1965). were conducted according to guidelines presented by Inuinnait life has changed considerably since the Spradley (1979). Five male traditional hunters, four early twentieth century. The Inuinnait now live in community elders (female=3 ; male=1), and a single modular homes. Travel is often accomplished female traditional healer were interviewed in depth. through all-terrain vehicles and snowmobiles. These individuals were chosen based on recommenda- Kugluktuk has a health clinic, a school that provides tions of community leaders, active hunting and elementary and secondary education, several church- gathering during the period of study, ability to identify es, and offices of the municipal and territorial plants in the field, and availability. A hunter was government. Food and other supplies arrive regularly considered to be someone who remained actively by plane and once or twice each summer by ocean engaged in hunting. An elder was an older person freighter. These supplemental freight charges greatly who had grown up on the land and experienced a inflate the cost of goods in Arctic communities. The reasonably traditional life; the current Inuinnait exorbitant cost of market foods is offset by subsist- settlements did not exist during the childhood of ence hunting, a culturally salient practice that contin- these elders. Only one traditional healer was identi- ues today. Kuhnlein et al. (2004) estimated that 28% fied by community members as residing within of the calories in the average Inuit diet was still Kugluktuk during the period of fieldwork. derived from wild-harvested foods. Caribou (Rangifer A local-government native speaking interpreter tarandus C.H. Smith Cervidae) and arctic char was contracted for interviews with two of the commu- (Salvelinus alpinus L. Salmonidae) remain integral to the nity elders. Other participants were bilingual or spoke Inuinnait culture and livelihood. Both are actively English as their primary language. No material sought and relished. compensation was provided to study participants. Carl Linnaeus pioneered ethnobotanical methods Informed consent was obtained from each participant. in 1732 while living among the Sami of Lapland. Documentation of traditional knowledge was ap- Since this notable beginning, ethnobotanical research proved by the Nunavut Research Institute. Interview has remained relatively uncommon among arctic methods were approved by California State Universi- cultures. The objective of this study was to document ty, Fullerton IRB. the traditional and contemporary uses for plants Each plant species mentioned during interviews among the Kiluhikturmiut Inuinnait of Kugluktuk, was collected, identified using Porsild and Cody Nunavut, Canada. It was predicted that even within (1980) by Davis, and deposited at four herbaria the depauperate flora of the Coronation Gulf region (California State University Fullerton (MACF), Gray of the central Canadian Arctic, the Kiluhikturmiut Herbarium at Harvard (GH), University of Guelph (OAC), and the Canadian Museum of Nature (CAN). 79 Research Communicaon Table 1. Contemporary Use of Plants by the Kiluhikturmiut Inuinnait Plants used by the Kiluhikturmiut Inuinnait for food. Name Family Uses Mentions (n=10) Arctostaphylos spp. Ericaceae leaves, infusion 2 (kablaq) Empetrum nigrum Empetraceae raw fruit, mixed with fat 7 (paun’ngaq) Hedysarum alpinum Fabaceae raw root, boiled 8 (mahuk) Oxyria digyna Polygonaceae raw leaves and flowers, prepared in a concoction 9* (qunguliit) Pedicularis capitata Scrophulariaceae raw nectar 1* Rubus chamaemorus Rosaceae raw
Recommended publications
  • Of the Inuit Bowhead Knowledge Study Nunavut, Canada
    english cover 11/14/01 1:13 PM Page 1 FINAL REPORT OF THE INUIT BOWHEAD KNOWLEDGE STUDY NUNAVUT, CANADA By Inuit Study Participants from: Arctic Bay, Arviat, Cape Dorset, Chesterfield Inlet, Clyde River, Coral Harbour, Grise Fiord, Hall Beach, Igloolik, Iqaluit, Kimmirut, Kugaaruk, Pangnirtung, Pond Inlet, Qikiqtarjuaq, Rankin Inlet, Repulse Bay, and Whale Cove Principal Researchers: Keith Hay (Study Coordinator) and Members of the Inuit Bowhead Knowledge Study Committee: David Aglukark (Chairperson), David Igutsaq, MARCH, 2000 Joannie Ikkidluak, Meeka Mike FINAL REPORT OF THE INUIT BOWHEAD KNOWLEDGE STUDY NUNAVUT, CANADA By Inuit Study Participants from: Arctic Bay, Arviat, Cape Dorset, Chesterfield Inlet, Clyde River, Coral Harbour, Grise Fiord, Hall Beach, Igloolik, Iqaluit, Kimmirut, Kugaaruk, Pangnirtung, Pond Inlet, Qikiqtarjuaq, Rankin Inlet, Nunavut Wildlife Management Board Repulse Bay, and Whale Cove PO Box 1379 Principal Researchers: Iqaluit, Nunavut Keith Hay (Study Coordinator) and X0A 0H0 Members of the Inuit Bowhead Knowledge Study Committee: David Aglukark (Chairperson), David Igutsaq, MARCH, 2000 Joannie Ikkidluak, Meeka Mike Cover photo: Glenn Williams/Ursus Illustration on cover, inside of cover, title page, dedication page, and used as a report motif: “Arvanniaqtut (Whale Hunters)”, sc 1986, Simeonie Kopapik, Cape Dorset Print Collection. ©Nunavut Wildlife Management Board March, 2000 Table of Contents I LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES . .i II DEDICATION . .ii III ABSTRACT . .iii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 RATIONALE AND BACKGROUND FOR THE STUDY . .1 1.2 TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE AND SCIENCE . .1 2 METHODOLOGY 3 2.1 PLANNING AND DESIGN . .3 2.2 THE STUDY AREA . .4 2.3 INTERVIEW TECHNIQUES AND THE QUESTIONNAIRE . .4 2.4 METHODS OF DATA ANALYSIS .
    [Show full text]
  • Diamond Jenness (1886-1969)
    Diamond Jenness (1886-1969) HENRY B. COLLINS and WILLIAM E. TAYLOR Jr. Canada’smost distinguished anthropologist, Dr. Diamond Jenness, formerly Chiefof the Division of Anthropology, National Museums of Canada, and Honorary Associate of the Arctic Institute of North America, died peacefully at his home in the Gatineau Hills near Ottawa on 29 November, 1969. He was one of that rapidly-vanishing, virtually extinct kind - the all round anthropolo- gist, who, working seriously, turned out first-class publications in all four major branches of the discipline : ethnology, linguistics, archaeology, and physical anthropology. One must also add a fifth: applied anthropology, a fitting designa- tion for theseries of monographs on Eskimo administration in Alaska, Canada, and Greenland which he wrote after his retirement and which were published by the Arctic Institute between 1962 and 1968. Diamond Jennesswas born in Wellington,New Zealand, on 10 February 1886, and attended Victoria University College, one of the four branches of the University ofNew Zealand, wherehe graduated withfirst class honours in classics in 1908. Later he studied at Balliol College, Oxford, under one of the outstanding ethnologists of the time, Professor R. R. Marett. He received both a B.A. in Lit. Hum. and a diploma in Anthropology at Oxford in 1911. In 191 1-12 he was designated Oxford Scholar in Papua and was sent by the Uni- versity to make anthropological studies among the Northern d’Entrecasteaux, a primitive tribe dwelling on the islands of the D’Entrecasteaux Archipelago off the east coast of New Guinea. The results of this first field-work were published by Oxford University (1 920a).
    [Show full text]
  • Statutory Report on Wildlife to the Nunavut Legislative Assembly Section 176 of the Wildlife Act
    Statutory Report on Wildlife to the Nunavut Legislative Assembly Section 176 of the Wildlife Act 1.0 Review of Wildlife and Habitat Management Programs for Terrestrial Species in Nunavut…………………………………………………………….1 1.1 Wildlife Act and Wildlife Regulations………………………………………………..2 1.2 Qikiqtaaluk Region……………………………………………………………………2 1.2.1 Qikiqtaaluk Research Initiatives…………………………………………………….2 a. Peary caribou………………………………………………………………………….2 b. High Arctic muskox…………………………………………………………………...3 c. North Baffin caribou…………………………………………………………………..4 1.2.2 Qikiqtaaluk Management Initiatives………………………………………………...5 a. Peary Caribou Management Plan……………………………………………………...5 b. High Arctic Muskox…………………………………………………………………..5 c. South Baffin Management Plan……………………………………………………….6 1.3 Kitikmeot Region……………………………………………………………………...8 1.3.1 Kitikmeot Research Initiatives………………………………………………………9 a. Wolverine and Grizzly bear Hair Snagging………………………………………….. 9 b. Mainland Caribou Projects……………………………………………………………9 c. Boothia Caribou Project……………………………………………………………...10 d. Dolphin and Union Caribou Project……………………............................................10 e. Mainland and Boothia Peninsula Muskoxen………………………………………...11 f. Harvest and Ecological Research Operational System (HEROS)…………………...12 g. Vegetation Mapping……………………………………………………………….....12 1.3.2 Kitikmeot Management Initiatives…………………………………………………12 a. Grizzly Bear Management…………………………………………………………...12 b. Bluenose East Management Plan…………………………………………………….12 c. DU Caribou Management Plan………………………………………………………13 d. Muskox Status
    [Show full text]
  • A Legacy of Excellent Service Passed Down Through Generations
    A LEGACY OF EXCELLENT SERVICE PASSED DOWN THROUGH GENERATIONS October 24, 2019 In early September, the NEAS vessel, MV Qamutik, and its crew arrived off the shores of Kugaaruk, a remote community located south of the Bay of Boothia in the eastern part of Nunavut's Kitikmeot region. This was not a routine call in Nunavut’s annual dry cargo marine resupply operations. No, this day was different for our team. This arrival on the NEAS sailing schedule was special. Members of the NEAS crew on the Qamutik that day included Norman Qavvik and Waylon Annaklik, and this was a homecoming, a celebration of NEAS welcomed Fred Qavvik once again on the MV QAMUTIK during operations family and passing down of values in Kugaaruk. From left to right: Capt. MV Qamutik, Louis-René Longchamps, through the generations. We picked Norman Qavvik, Waylon Annaklik, and Fred Qavvik. up Fred Qavvik, Waylon’s father, who joined the NEAS crew. The family enjoyed lunch on board with the Captain. “It was cheerful to have the Qavvik family visit,” said Capt. Louis-René Longchamps of the MV Qamutik. “Big thanks to the Captain and the chef for the awesome lunch,” said Fred Qavvik. “Our young ones really enjoyed the experience of visiting the ship. It was a special day for everyone.” Norman Qavvik, Fred Qavvik and Waylon Annaklik completed the NEAS marine training program at Nunavut Fisheries and Marine Training Consortium in Iqaluit in 2012, 2015 and 2019 respectively. Norman started as a Deckhand, was promoted and now serves as Wheelsman. He is also part of the Firefighter team on board.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining Precontact Inuit Gender Complexity and Its
    EXAMINING PRECONTACT INUIT GENDER COMPLEXITY AND ITS DISCURSIVE POTENTIAL FOR LGBTQ2S+ AND DECOLONIZATION MOVEMENTS by Meghan Walley B.A. McGill University, 2014 A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Archaeology Memorial University of Newfoundland May 2018 St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador 0 ABSTRACT Anthropological literature and oral testimony assert that Inuit gender did not traditionally fit within a binary framework. Men’s and women’s social roles were not wholly determined by their bodies, there were mediatory roles between masculine and feminine identities, and role-swapping was—and continues to be—widespread. However, archaeologists have largely neglected Inuit gender diversity as an area of research. This thesis has two primary objectives: 1) to explore the potential impacts of presenting queer narratives of the Inuit past through a series of interviews that were conducted with Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Queer/Questioning and Two-Spirit (LGBTQ2S+) Inuit and 2) to consider ways in which archaeological materials articulate with and convey a multiplicity of gender expressions specific to pre-contact Inuit identity. This work encourages archaeologists to look beyond categories that have been constructed and naturalized within white settler spheres, and to replace them with ontologically appropriate histories that incorporate a range of Inuit voices. I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, qujannamiik/nakummek to all of the Inuit who participated in interviews, spoke to me about my work, and provided me with vital feedback. My research would be nothing without your input. I also wish to thank Safe Alliance for helping me identify interview participants, particularly Denise Cole, one of its founding members, who has provided me with invaluable insights, and who does remarkable work that will continue to motivate and inform my own.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change and Food Sovereignty in Nunavut
    land Article Being on Land and Sea in Troubled Times: Climate Change and Food Sovereignty in Nunavut Bindu Panikkar 1,* and Benjamin Lemmond 2 1 Environmental Studies Program and the Rubenstein School of the Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, 81 Carrigan Dr., Burlington, VT 05405, USA 2 Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA; blemmond@ufl.edu * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 7 November 2020; Accepted: 7 December 2020; Published: 10 December 2020 Abstract: Climate change driven food insecurity has emerged as a topic of special concern in the Canadian Arctic. Inuit communities in this region rely heavily on subsistence; however, access to traditional food sources may have been compromised due to climate change. Drawing from a total of 25 interviews among Inuit elders and experienced hunters from Cambridge Bay and Kugluktuk in Nunavut, Canada, this research examines how climate change is impacting food sovereignty and health. Our results show that reports of food insecurity were more pronounced in Kugluktuk than Cambridge Bay. Participants in Kugluktuk consistently noted declining availability of preferred fish and game species (e.g., caribou, Arctic char), a decline in participation of sharing networks, and overall increased difficulty accessing traditional foods. Respondents in both communities presented a consistent picture of climate change compounding existing socio-economic (e.g., poverty, disconnect between elders and youth) and health stressors affecting multiple aspects of food sovereignty. This article presents a situated understanding of how climate change as well as other sociocultural factors are eroding food sovereignty at the community-scale in the Arctic.
    [Show full text]
  • Baker Lake NUNAVUT
    Journal of the Northern Territories Water and Waste Association September 2013 Water, Water, Everywhere... PUBLICATIONS MAIL AGREEMENT#40934510 �������� �a�e �n �he ���� �ana�a 9 Aspen Drive, Hay River NT, X0E 0R6 Providing Trucked Municipal Services Solutions We specialize in Municipal Water, Sewage, Garbage and Fuel Delivery Vehicles Built in the north for the harshest conditions ForFor Information Information onon OurOur Products Contact Contact Us Us KINGLANDToll Free: MANUFACTURING 1-800-719-3888 TollPhone: Free: 1-800-719-3888867-874-2373 Phone: 867-874-2373 Fax: 867-874-4819 Fax: 867-874-4819 email:email: [email protected] [email protected] Or visitOr ourvisit ourwebsite website at at www www.king-manufacturing.com.king-manufacturing.com ad bluebrute sizes_Layout 1 21/08/2013 11:56 AM Page 1 SHOWN ACTUAL SIZE THE BIGGEST MOLDED C907 PRESSURE FITTING IN THE WORLD CAN’T FIT ON THIS PAGE. Introducing 10" & 12" molded C907 pressure fittings – available only from IPEX. As one of the first to pioneer PVC pipe and fittings in North America our commitment to innovation has led IPEX to introduce many industry firsts – including the largest sizes of PVC pressure pipe and fittings available anywhere in the world. Today, we are proud to offer the industry’s first 10" and 12" C907 molded pressure fittings. To learn more, call us or visit www.ipexinc.com Products manufactured by IPEX Inc. Toll Free: 1-866-473-9462 In this issue... The Journal Editor’s Notes – Ken Johnson ...........................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Transits of the Northwest Passage to End of the 2020 Navigation Season Atlantic Ocean ↔ Arctic Ocean ↔ Pacific Ocean
    TRANSITS OF THE NORTHWEST PASSAGE TO END OF THE 2020 NAVIGATION SEASON ATLANTIC OCEAN ↔ ARCTIC OCEAN ↔ PACIFIC OCEAN R. K. Headland and colleagues 7 April 2021 Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 1ER. <[email protected]> The earliest traverse of the Northwest Passage was completed in 1853 starting in the Pacific Ocean to reach the Atlantic Oceam, but used sledges over the sea ice of the central part of Parry Channel. Subsequently the following 319 complete maritime transits of the Northwest Passage have been made to the end of the 2020 navigation season, before winter began and the passage froze. These transits proceed to or from the Atlantic Ocean (Labrador Sea) in or out of the eastern approaches to the Canadian Arctic archipelago (Lancaster Sound or Foxe Basin) then the western approaches (McClure Strait or Amundsen Gulf), across the Beaufort Sea and Chukchi Sea of the Arctic Ocean, through the Bering Strait, from or to the Bering Sea of the Pacific Ocean. The Arctic Circle is crossed near the beginning and the end of all transits except those to or from the central or northern coast of west Greenland. The routes and directions are indicated. Details of submarine transits are not included because only two have been reported (1960 USS Sea Dragon, Capt. George Peabody Steele, westbound on route 1 and 1962 USS Skate, Capt. Joseph Lawrence Skoog, eastbound on route 1). Seven routes have been used for transits of the Northwest Passage with some minor variations (for example through Pond Inlet and Navy Board Inlet) and two composite courses in summers when ice was minimal (marked ‘cp’).
    [Show full text]
  • KITIKMEOT INUIT ASSOCIATION PRESS RELEASE for Immediate
    KITIKMEOT INUIT ASSOCIATION PRESS RELEASE For Immediate Release KITIKMEOT INUIT ASSOCIATION (KIA) CLARIFIES ITS POSITION ON GRAYS BAY ROAD & PORT PROJECT Cambridge Bay, Nunavut, June 4th, 2018 This past week in Nunavut’s Legislative Assembly, statements were made by both the Premier and the Minister of Economic Development & Transportation (ED&T) in response to questions about the Grays Bay Road and Port (GBRP) Project. A number of these statements, recorded in the Nunavut Hansard, are either inaCCurate or need to be clarified to prevent misunderstanding about the events and actions that prompted them. As a consequenCe, KIA President Stanley Anablak has issued the following statement: “As the President of a Regional Inuit Association that represents more than 6,000 Inuit in the Kitikmeot region, I have a responsibility to set the record straight, especially when the record is being depicted in a way that is contrary to the facts and as we have stated these facts to our membership and stakeholders. “The Premier was inaccurate in Characterizing the way by which the Kitikmeot Inuit Association (KIA) took on the role of sole proponent for this project. KIA never requested to be the sole proponent of this project prior to the Government of Nunavut’s abandoning its role as Co-Proponent. Given the GN’s decision and our desire to continue to push the project forward, the only ChoiCe available to KIA was to beCome the sole proponent of the GBRP Project. “Concerning statements about the project’s funding model, it should be noted that KIA on three occasions requested to GN leadership the opportunity to have an intensive and detailed discussion on how the financial structure for the Project is intended to work.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Wellness Plan Arviat
    Community Wellness Plan Arviat Prepared by: Arviat Community Wellness Working Group as Part of the Nunavut Community Wellness Project. Arviat Community Wellness Plan The Nunavut Community Wellness Project was a tripartite project led by Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. in partnership with Government of Nunavut, Department of Health and Social Services and Health Canada. Photographic images on cover, inside front cover, table of contents, headers and on pages 2, 11 and 12 taken by Kukik Tagalik. July, 2011 table of contents PAGE 2 1. Introduction 2 2. Community Wellness Working Group 3 2.1 Purpose of Working Group 3 2.2 Objectives of the Nunavut Community Wellness Working Groups 3 2.3 Description of the Group 4 3. Community Overview 4 4. Creating Awareness in the Community 4 4.1 Description of Community-Based Awareness Activities 5 5. What are the Resources in Our Community 5 5.1 Community Map and Description (From Assets Exercise) 5 5.2 Community Assets and Description (From Asset Exercise) 7 6. Issues Identification 7 6.1 Process for Identifying Issues 7 6.2 What are the Issues 7 7. Community Vision for Wellness 7 7.1 Process for Identifying Vision 7 7.2 Community Goals (Prioritized) 8 8. Community Plan 8 8.1 Connecting Assets to Wellness Vision (from Assets Exercise) 10 8.2 Steps to Reach Goals and Objectives 12 9. Conclusions 12 9.1 Establish a Community Wellness Working Group 12 9.2 The Hiring of the Pilot Coordinator 12 9.3 Development of a Community Wellness Planning Process 13 9.4 Presentation of Recommendations to the Hamlet Council 13 9.5 Ongoing Communication and Work 13 10.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.0 Corporate Priorities 10
    Corporate Plan 2020-2023 1 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION 3 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SCAN 4 3.0 INUIT EMPLOYMENT PLAN 7 4.0 CORPORATE PRIORITIES 10 5.0 CONCLUSION 19 Appendices APPENDIX A 2020-2021 CAPITAL BUDGET 20 APPENDIX B 2020-2021 OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE BUDGET 21 APPENDIX C 2019 EMPLOYMENT SUMMARY 23 2 1.0 Introduction Qulliq Energy Corporation (QEC) is a Government of Nunavut (GN) territorial corporation. Historically, the Northern Canada Power Commission (NCPC) was responsible for supplying power to the territory from 1949 to 1988. After which, operations were transferred to Northwest Territories Power Corporation (NTPC). In 1999, Nunavut established its own locally managed utility, and on April 1, 2001, Nunavut Power Corporation (NPC) came into being under the Nunavut Power Corporation Act. NPC was subsequently renamed Qulliq Energy Corporation and the Nunavut Power Corporation Act was renamed the Qulliq Energy Corporation Act (“QEC Act”) as the result of legislation passed in March of 2003. This legislation also broadened the Corporation’s mandate to respond to a wider range of energy use and conservation issues within Nunavut. In 2018, the QEC Act was further amended allowing the Corporation to purchase power in anticipation of launching the Independent Power Producers program. Through the operation of 25 stand-alone diesel power plants with a total installed capacity of approximately 76,000 kilowatts, QEC is the sole provider of electricity to approximately 15,000 customers in the territory. The Corporation provides mechanical, electrical, and line maintenance services from three regional centers: Iqaluit, Rankin Inlet, and Cambridge Bay. QEC’s administrative activities are carried out at the Head Office in Baker Lake and the Corporate Office in Iqaluit.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Determination and the Inuit
    Rgzorgve in gradiva Ljubljgna 2000 $I 36/37 273 KLEMEN JELINCIC SELF-DETERMINATION AND THE INUIT INTRODUCTION Since the World War II the principle of self-determination of peoples has gained much in its imp o rt ~lI1ce due to the inclusion in the Charter of the Uni ted Nations and has later on played a determining role in the processes thro ugh which most of the European colonies gained their political independence. Its application, though, was somehow limited by the principle of inviolability of th e territorial integrity of sovereign states and therefore did not include several groups, like the national minorities, e.g. Hungarians in Romania. It certainly did not include the numerous ethnic groups that have been populating the are;)s ter­ ritorially connected to the metropolitan state long before the processes of European colo nizatio n have begun o r befo re the expansio n of the modern state, as it followed the retreat of ccloni;)l rule and that still pursue through several prac­ tices the traditional subsistence activities, upon which their culture and identity is/was based. Many of these groups with very diverse forms of social organiza­ ti o n, have been, despite its problema tics, described in the terms of tribal societies. These groups are collectively known under many name ~ slIch as Native, Aboriginal, Indigenous, First, Tribal o r Original peoples, but also as the Fourth World. Many times the terms are interchangeable and are used as self-designation by several of these peoples (Native in Alaska, Aboriginal in Canada, Tribal in India) or as names of NGO's representing their interests (Committee for Original People's Entitlement in Canada, The Indigenous Peoples Union in the USA), but th e literature as well is prone to use more than one of these terms.
    [Show full text]