Download 2009-2010 Annual Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download 2009-2010 Annual Report NUNAVUT IMPACT REVIEW BOARD NUNAVUMI AVATILIKIYIN ᓄᓇᕘᒥ ᐊᕙᑎᓕᕆᓂᕐᒥᑦ ANNUAL REPORT 2009 / 2010 KATIMAYIN 2009 / 2010 ᐊᕐᕌᒍ ᑕᒫᖅᓯᐅᑦ ᐅᓂᒃᑳ 2009-ᒥᑦ 2010-ᒧᑦ Note: This report covers the 2009-10 fiscal year (April 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010) Kaoyimayakhak: Una unipkagoyok 2009-min 2010-mun aolanikmi ukeomi (April 1-min 2009-mi March 31-mun 2010-mi) ᑎᑎᖅᑲᖅ: ᑖᓐᓇ ᐅᓂᒃᑲᓕᐊᖅ ᐅᓂᒃᑲᐅᑎᕐᑲᖅᑯᖅ ᒪᓕᑦᑐᒍ 2009-10 ᒐᕙᒪᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᕐᕌᒍᖕᒐ (ᐊᐃᐳᕈ. 1, 2009, ᒫᓯᔾ 31, 2010) Cover Photos: Caribou, Muskox, Purple Saxifrage, Seashore – Li Wan Cover Design by Aliza Weller Piksat: Tuktu, umingmak, aupilaktaq, tariup hinaa-Li Wan-mut Uqalimaagaup qanga ihivriuqtauhimayuq Aliza Weller-mut ᖄᖓᓃᑦᑐᑦ ᐊᔾᔨᓕᐅᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᓂᑯᐃᑦ: ᑐᒃᑐ, ᐅᒥᖕᒪᒃ, ᐊᐅᐱᓚᒃᑕᙳᐊᑦ, ᑕᕆᐅᓪᓗ ᓯᓈᖓ - ᓖ ᕗᐊᓐ-ᒧᑦ ᐅᖃᓕᒫᒐᐅᑉ ᖄᖓ ᐋᖅᑭᒃᓱᖅᑕᐅᓂᑯ ᐊᓖᓴ ᕗᐃᐊᕐᓚ-ᒧᑦ NUNAVUT IMPACT REVIEW BOARD CONTENTS | TALVANI OKAOTAOYUN | ᐃᓗᓕᖏᑦ MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIRPERSON ........................................................................................................ 3 INTRODUCTION: OUR MANDATE, MISSION, AND RESPONSIBILITIES ........................................................ 4 BOARD MEMEBERS ................................................................................................................................. 5 STAFF MEMBERS ..................................................................................................................................... 6 SCREENING PROCESS ............................................................................................................................... 8 SCREENINGS ............................................................................................................................................ 9 REVIEW PROCESS .................................................................................................................................. 10 REVIEWS ............................................................................................................................................... 11 MONITORING PROCESS ......................................................................................................................... 17 MONITORING ........................................................................................................................................ 18 ACHIEVING OUR MISSION ...................................................................................................................... 21 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ...................................................................................................................... 21 WORKING RELATIONSHIPS ................................................................................................................. 22 INITIATIVES ........................................................................................................................................ 23 UPCOMING/FUTURE PLANS ................................................................................................................... 26 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ....................................................................................................................... 27 STATEMENT OF REVENUE AND EXPENSES - CORE .................................................................................. 39 OKAOHEN IKHIVAOTALEOM .................................................................................................................. 47 HIVONIKHIYUTIN: HAVAAKHIYUTAOYUN UVAPTIKNUN, INIKTIGAKHAVULO, HAVAAGIYAGEAKAKTAVULO............................................................................................................. 48 KATIMAYINI ILAOYUN ............................................................................................................................ 49 HAVAKTUNI ILAOYUN ............................................................................................................................ 50 ILITOKHAENIK ........................................................................................................................................ 52 ILITOKHAKTAOHIMAYUN ....................................................................................................................... 53 IHIVGEOGAKHAN ................................................................................................................................... 54 IHIVGEOKHIYUHEN ................................................................................................................................ 55 ANNUAL REPORT 2009/10 1 NUNAVUT IMPACT REVIEW BOARD AMIGIYUHEN ......................................................................................................................................... 61 AMIGIYAOYUN ...................................................................................................................................... 62 INIGEAGANI HAVAAKHIYUTIN UVAPTIKNUN: KITOLIKAA ILAOYAGANI ................................................... 65 INIGEAGANI HAVAAKHIYUTIN UVAPTIKNUN: HAVAKATIGEGUTIVUN ..................................................... 66 INIGEAGANI HAVAAKHIYUTIN UVAPTIKNUN: UPIYUTIN ......................................................................... 67 TIKITUKHAN HIVUNIKHAMILO OPALOGAEYAOTIN ................................................................................. 70 MANILIKIYUTINUN NAONAEPKOTIN ...................................................................................................... 71 ᑐᓴᒐᒃᓴᑦ ᐃᒃᓯᕙᐅᑕᕐᒥᑦ ............................................................................................................................ 97 ᐱᒋᐊᕐᓂᖓ: ᐱᓇᓱᐊᒐᕆᔭᕗᑦ, ᑐᕌᕐᕕᒋᔪᒪᔭᕗᑦ, ᐱᓇᓱᐊᒐᖃᖅᑎᑕᐅᓯᒪᓂᕆᔭᕗᓪᓗ .................................. 98 ᑲᑎᒪᔩᑦ .................................................................................................................................................. 99 ᐃᖅᑲᓇᐃᔭᖅᑏᑦ ................................................................................................................................... 100 ᕿᒥᕐᕈᔭᐅᔭᕆᐊᓖᑦ ............................................................................................................................... 102 ᕿᒥᕐᕈᔭᐅᕆᐊᖃᖅᑐᓅᓕᖓᔪᑦ .............................................................................................................. 103 ᖃᐅᔨᒋᐊᖅᑕᐅᒃᑭᕆᐊᓖᑦ ...................................................................................................................... 104 ᖃᐅᔨᒋᐊᖅᑕᐅᒃᑭᕆᐊᖃᖅᑐᓅᓕᖓᔪᖅ ................................................................................................. 105 ᓇᐅᑦᓯᖅᑐᐃᓂᕐᒨᓕᖓᔪᑦ ...................................................................................................................... 111 ᓇᐅᑦᓯᖅᑐᒐᐅᔪᑦ ................................................................................................................................... 112 ᑐᕌᕐᕕᒋᔪᒪᔭᑦᑎᓐᓂᒃ ᐊᓂᒍᐃᓂᖅ: ᐃᓄᖕᓂᒃ ᐃᓚᐅᑎᑦᓯᓂᖅ .................................................................... 115 ᑐᕌᕐᕕᒋᔪᒪᔭᑦᑎᓐᓂᒃ ᐊᓂᒍᐃᓂᖅ: ᑎᒥᒋᔭᐅᔪᓂᒃ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖃᖃᑎᖃᑦᑕᕐᓂᖅ ............................................ 116 ᑐᕌᕐᕕᒋᔪᒪᔭᑦᑎᓐᓂᒃ ᐊᓂᒍᐃᓂᖅ: ᐱᓇᓱᐊᒐᕆᔪᒪᔭᕗᑦ ........................................................................... 117 ᓯᕗᓂᒃᓴᒧᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᕗᑦ ........................................................................................................................ 120 ᑮᓇᐅᔭᓕᕆᓂᕐᒨᓕᒐᔪᑦ ......................................................................................................................... 121 2 ANNUAL REPORT 2009/10 NUNAVUT IMPACT REVIEW BOARD MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIRPERSON I am pleased to present the Nunavut Impact have attended, presented, and participated in a Review Board’s Annual Report for the 2009-10 number of conferences and workshops fiscal year. The NIRB’s mission is to protect and throughout the year. The Board continues to promote the well-being of the Environment and collaborate with its partners in government and Nunavummiut through the impact assessment with Inuit organizations to ensure the most process. It has been another busy and efficient regulatory system possible. successful year for the NIRB and I am proud of the work that my fellow Board members and THE FUTURE our staff have completed. In 2010 and 2011, key initiatives for the Board HIGHLIGHTS OF 2009-10 will include continuing our public awareness programs for ongoing reviews, working on During 2009-10 the NIRB staff and Board were marine issues through the Nunavut Marine kept busy with a total of 186 project proposals Council, assisting with the finalization of that were submitted for assessment in enabling legislation, and revising our series of accordance with Article 12 of the Nunavut Land public guides. Claims Agreement (NLCA). In addition to 92 new proposals requiring Screening, there are I trust you will find this Annual Report to be currently 6 projects undergoing Review and 3 informative and useful. Our office staff are projects with active monitoring programs. always available to answer any questions that you may have; please feel free to contact them The Board and staff continued to implement the directly or through our general email address at NIRB’s 5 Year Strategic Plan (developed in [email protected]. Also, we are continuously 2008), with a focus, where funding allows, on updating materials on our ftp site, which can be key areas such as governance, legislation, policy found at http://ftp.nirb.ca. development, and human resources. In order to ensure its continued success, the Board also Thank you for your interest in the NIRB and updated its internal operational and board your continued support of the work we do. We governance policies, and hired several new staff look forward to
Recommended publications
  • Diamond Jenness (1886-1969)
    Diamond Jenness (1886-1969) HENRY B. COLLINS and WILLIAM E. TAYLOR Jr. Canada’smost distinguished anthropologist, Dr. Diamond Jenness, formerly Chiefof the Division of Anthropology, National Museums of Canada, and Honorary Associate of the Arctic Institute of North America, died peacefully at his home in the Gatineau Hills near Ottawa on 29 November, 1969. He was one of that rapidly-vanishing, virtually extinct kind - the all round anthropolo- gist, who, working seriously, turned out first-class publications in all four major branches of the discipline : ethnology, linguistics, archaeology, and physical anthropology. One must also add a fifth: applied anthropology, a fitting designa- tion for theseries of monographs on Eskimo administration in Alaska, Canada, and Greenland which he wrote after his retirement and which were published by the Arctic Institute between 1962 and 1968. Diamond Jennesswas born in Wellington,New Zealand, on 10 February 1886, and attended Victoria University College, one of the four branches of the University ofNew Zealand, wherehe graduated withfirst class honours in classics in 1908. Later he studied at Balliol College, Oxford, under one of the outstanding ethnologists of the time, Professor R. R. Marett. He received both a B.A. in Lit. Hum. and a diploma in Anthropology at Oxford in 1911. In 191 1-12 he was designated Oxford Scholar in Papua and was sent by the Uni- versity to make anthropological studies among the Northern d’Entrecasteaux, a primitive tribe dwelling on the islands of the D’Entrecasteaux Archipelago off the east coast of New Guinea. The results of this first field-work were published by Oxford University (1 920a).
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnobotany of the Kiluhikturmiut Inuinnait of Kugluktuk, Nunavut, Canada
    Research Communicaon Ethnobotany of the Kiluhikturmiut Inuinnait of Kugluktuk, Nunavut, Canada Jonathan Duffy Davis1, Sandra Anne Banack2 Author address: 1Fullerton Arboretum, California State University, Fullerton, CA 92831, 2Instute for Ethnomedicine, P.O. Box 3464, Jackson, WY 83001 Received: September 24, 2012 Volume: 3:78‐90 Published: December 29, 2012 © 2012 Society of Ethnobiology Abstract: The disparity in floral diversity between tropical and arcc regions is reflected in a paucity of ethnobotanical research among arcc cultures. The Kiluhikturmiut Inuinnait are an Inuit subpopulaon who inhabit the Kikmeot Region of the Territory of Nunavut in Canada’s Arcc. We conducted an ethnobotanical survey in the Inuinnait hamlet of Kugluktuk to document the tradional uses of plants as food, materials, and medicine. Data were gathered through unstructured interviews, parcipant observaon, purposive sampling, and voucher‐specimen collecon of all plants used. Uses were documented for 23 plant species/types contained in 14 families. Nine species/types were eaten, six species/types were used as materials, and 12 species were used for medicine. Villagers shared common knowledge of plants used for food and materials; however, knowledge of medicinal plants was restricted to a single healer. We argue that specialized knowledge such as the use of medicinal plants is important to document especially when the number individuals using this knowledge is dwindling. Abstract: Pitquhiigut piruqhimayut qauyihaivluk qanuq inuit atuqtauvagait atungauyanik niqiuvluk,
    [Show full text]
  • Transits of the Northwest Passage to End of the 2020 Navigation Season Atlantic Ocean ↔ Arctic Ocean ↔ Pacific Ocean
    TRANSITS OF THE NORTHWEST PASSAGE TO END OF THE 2020 NAVIGATION SEASON ATLANTIC OCEAN ↔ ARCTIC OCEAN ↔ PACIFIC OCEAN R. K. Headland and colleagues 7 April 2021 Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 1ER. <[email protected]> The earliest traverse of the Northwest Passage was completed in 1853 starting in the Pacific Ocean to reach the Atlantic Oceam, but used sledges over the sea ice of the central part of Parry Channel. Subsequently the following 319 complete maritime transits of the Northwest Passage have been made to the end of the 2020 navigation season, before winter began and the passage froze. These transits proceed to or from the Atlantic Ocean (Labrador Sea) in or out of the eastern approaches to the Canadian Arctic archipelago (Lancaster Sound or Foxe Basin) then the western approaches (McClure Strait or Amundsen Gulf), across the Beaufort Sea and Chukchi Sea of the Arctic Ocean, through the Bering Strait, from or to the Bering Sea of the Pacific Ocean. The Arctic Circle is crossed near the beginning and the end of all transits except those to or from the central or northern coast of west Greenland. The routes and directions are indicated. Details of submarine transits are not included because only two have been reported (1960 USS Sea Dragon, Capt. George Peabody Steele, westbound on route 1 and 1962 USS Skate, Capt. Joseph Lawrence Skoog, eastbound on route 1). Seven routes have been used for transits of the Northwest Passage with some minor variations (for example through Pond Inlet and Navy Board Inlet) and two composite courses in summers when ice was minimal (marked ‘cp’).
    [Show full text]
  • Caribou (Barren-Ground Population) Rangifer Tarandus
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Caribou Rangifer tarandus Barren-ground population in Canada THREATENED 2016 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2016. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Caribou Rangifer tarandus, Barren-ground population, in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xiii + 123 pp. (http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=en&n=24F7211B-1). Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Anne Gunn, Kim Poole, and Don Russell for writing the status report on Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), Barren-ground population, in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Justina Ray, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Terrestrial Mammals Specialist Subcommittee, with the support of the members of the Terrestrial Mammals Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment and Climate Change Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-938-4125 Fax: 819-938-3984 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur le Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), population de la toundra, au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Caribou — Photo by A. Gunn. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2016. Catalogue No. CW69-14/746-2017E-PDF ISBN 978-0-660-07782-6 COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – November 2016 Common name Caribou - Barren-ground population Scientific name Rangifer tarandus Status Threatened Reason for designation Members of this population give birth on the open arctic tundra, and most subpopulations (herds) winter in vast subarctic forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Approaching Economic Growth and Sustainable Communities in Context of Mining in Nunavut
    Mining a Better Future: Approaching Economic Growth and Sustainable Communities in Context of Mining in Nunavut by Nadav Goelman B.A. (Professional Communications), Royal Roads University, 2010 Capstone Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Public Policy in the School of Public Policy Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences © Nadav Goelman 2014 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Spring 2014 Approval Name: Nadav Goelman Degree: Master of Public Policy Title of Thesis: Mining a Better Future: Approaching Economic Growth and Sustainable Communities in Context of Mining in Nunavut Examining Committee: Chair: Dominique M. Gross Professor, School of Public Policy, SFU Nancy Olewiler Senior Supervisor Professor Doug McArthur Supervisor Professor Maureen Maloney Internal Examiner Professor School of Public Policy Date Defended/Approved: March 5, 2014 ii Partial Copyright Licence iii Ethics Statement iv Abstract Resource development near isolated communities in Nunavut exacerbates preexisting social problems that are insufficiently ameliorated by the policy frameworks addressing them. Data from Baker Lake shows rising crime rates correlating with the mine’s arrival; and failure to ameliorate stagnant, declining education outcomes. The current framework of policy is comprised of loosely coordinated efforts by the federal and territorial governments. Supplemental community-driven research was found to identify additional interventions that garner renewed local support and heightened efficacy. Economic modeling of estimated costs and benefits of these interventions within three alternatives: a local, regional, or territorial rollout, revealed plausible net benefits at various discount rates. Additional qualitative evidence of pros and cons for each alternative supported recommendation of up to three local pilot project(s) to assess efficacy of these interventions to mitigate, ameliorate, and prevent the negative side effects of resource development in Nunavut, and remove barriers to equitable sustainable economic growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Nunavut Land Use Plan
    Draft Nunavut Land Use Plan Options and Recommendations Draft – 2014 Contents Introduction .............................................................................. 3 Aerodromes ................................................................................ 75 Purpose ........................................................................................... 3 DND Establishments ............................................................... 76 Guiding Policies, Objectives and Goals ............................... 3 North Warning System Sites................................................ 76 Considered Information ............................................................ 3 Encouraging Sustainable Economic Development ..... 77 Decision making framework .................................................... 4 Mineral Potential ...................................................................... 77 General Options Considered .................................................... 4 Oil and Gas Exploration .......................................................... 78 Protecting and Sustaining the Environment .................. 5 Commercial Fisheries .............................................................. 78 Key Migratory Bird Habitat Sites .......................................... 5 Mixed Use ............................................................................... 80 Caribou Habitat ......................................................................... 41 Mixed Use ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mining, Mineral Exploration and Geoscience Contents
    Overview 2020 Nunavut Mining, Mineral Exploration and Geoscience Contents 3 Land Tenure in Nunavut 30 Base Metals 6 Government of Canada 31 Diamonds 10 Government of Nunavut 3 2 Gold 16 Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated 4 4 Iron 2 0 Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office 4 6 Inactive projects 2 4 Kitikmeot Region 4 9 Glossary 2 6 Kivalliq Region 50 Guide to Abbreviations 2 8 Qikiqtani Region 51 Index About Nunavut: Mining, Mineral Exploration and by the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA), the regulatory Geoscience Overview 2020 body which oversees stock market and investment practices, and is intended to ensure that misleading, erroneous, or This publication is a combined effort of four partners: fraudulent information relating to mineral properties is not Crown‑Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada published and promoted to investors on the stock exchanges (CIRNAC), Government of Nunavut (GN), Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated (NTI), and Canada‑Nunavut Geoscience Office overseen by the CSA. Resource estimates reported by mineral (CNGO). The intent is to capture information on exploration and exploration companies that are listed on Canadian stock mining activities in 2020 and to make this information available exchanges must be NI 43‑101 compliant. to the public and industry stakeholders. We thank the many contributors who submitted data and Acknowledgements photos for this edition. Prospectors and mining companies are This publication was written by the Mineral Resources Division welcome to submit information on their programs and photos at CIRNAC’s Nunavut Regional Office (Matthew Senkow, for inclusion in next year’s publication. Feedback and comments Alia Bigio, Samuel de Beer, Yann Bureau, Cedric Mayer, and are always appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Experiences of Mining in Baker Lake, Nunavut
    Community Experiences of Mining in Baker Lake, Nunavut by Kelsey Peterson A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Geography Guelph, Ontario, Canada ©Kelsey Peterson, April, 2012 ABSTRACT COMMUNITY EXPERIENCES OF MINING IN BAKER LAKE, NUNAVUT Kelsey Peterson Advisor: University of Guelph, 2012 Professor Ben Bradshaw With recent increases in mineral prices, the Canadian Arctic has experienced a dramatic upswing in mining development. With the development of the Meadowbank gold mine, the nearby Hamlet of Baker Lake, Nunavut is experiencing these changes firsthand. In response to an invitation from the Hamlet of Baker Lake, this research document residents’ experiences with the Meadowbank mine. These experiences are not felt homogeneously across the community; indeed, residents’ experiences with mining have been mixed. Beyond this core finding, the research suggests four further notable insights: employment has provided the opportunity for people to elevate themselves out of welfare/social assistance; education has become more common, but some students are leaving high school to pursue mine work; and local businesses are benefiting from mining contracts, but this is limited to those companies pre-existing the mine. Finally, varied individual experiences are in part generated by an individual’s context including personal context and choices. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not have been possible without the support and assistance of several key people. My advisor, Ben Bradshaw, has been instrumental in all stages of pre- research, research and writing. From accepting me to the program and connecting me to Baker Lake to funding my research and reading innumerable drafts of the written thesis, Professor Bradshaw has been critical to this research project.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada's Arctic Marine Atlas
    Lincoln Sea Hall Basin MARINE ATLAS ARCTIC CANADA’S GREENLAND Ellesmere Island Kane Basin Nares Strait N nd ansen Sou s d Axel n Sve Heiberg rdr a up Island l Ch ann North CANADA’S s el I Pea Water ry Ch a h nnel Massey t Sou Baffin e Amund nd ISR Boundary b Ringnes Bay Ellef Norwegian Coburg Island Grise Fiord a Ringnes Bay Island ARCTIC MARINE z Island EEZ Boundary Prince i Borden ARCTIC l Island Gustaf E Adolf Sea Maclea Jones n Str OCEAN n ait Sound ATLANTIC e Mackenzie Pe Ball nn antyn King Island y S e trait e S u trait it Devon Wel ATLAS Stra OCEAN Q Prince l Island Clyde River Queens in Bylot Patrick Hazen Byam gt Channel o Island Martin n Island Ch tr. Channel an Pond Inlet S Bathurst nel Qikiqtarjuaq liam A Island Eclipse ust Lancaster Sound in Cornwallis Sound Hecla Ch Fitzwil Island and an Griper nel ait Bay r Resolute t Melville Barrow Strait Arctic Bay S et P l Island r i Kel l n e c n e n Somerset Pangnirtung EEZ Boundary a R M'Clure Strait h Island e C g Baffin Island Brodeur y e r r n Peninsula t a P I Cumberland n Peel Sound l e Sound Viscount Stefansson t Melville Island Sound Prince Labrador of Wales Igloolik Prince Sea it Island Charles ra Hadley Bay Banks St s Island le a Island W Hall Beach f Beaufort o M'Clintock Gulf of Iqaluit e c n Frobisher Bay i Channel Resolution r Boothia Boothia Sea P Island Sachs Franklin Peninsula Committee Foxe Harbour Strait Bay Melville Peninsula Basin Kimmirut Taloyoak N UNAT Minto Inlet Victoria SIA VUT Makkovik Ulukhaktok Kugaaruk Foxe Island Hopedale Liverpool Amundsen Victoria King
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Arctic Expedition 1913-18
    REPORT OF THE CANADIAN ARCTIC EXPEDITION 1913-18 VOLUME XIII: ESKIMO FOLK-LORE PART A: MYTHS AND TRADITIONS FROM NORTHERN ALASKA, THE MACKENZIE DELTA AND COR­ ONATION GULF. By D. JENNESS SOUTHERN PARTY, 1913-16 OTTAWA F. A. ACLAND PRINTER TO THE KING'S MOST EXCELLENT MAJESTY 111M Issued November 15, 1924 Report of the Canadian Arctic Expedition, 1913-18. VOLUME I: GENERA.L INTRODUCTION, NARRATIVE, ETC. Part A: NORTHERN PARTY, 1913-18 •..........•....................•••••••...• . (To be prepared). Part B: SOUTHERN PARTY, 1913-16. By Rudolph Martin Andel"llOn ............... (In preparation) VOLUME D: MA.MMA.LS A.ND BIBDS Part A: MAMMALS OF WESTERN ARCTIC AMERICA. · ................................•...........•.••••.•••••••••••••••••••..• (1 n prepaTlltion). Part B: BIRDS OF WESTERN ARCTIC AMERICA. · ............... ',' .......... '.............................................. (In prepllration). VOLUME m: INSECTS INTRODUCTION. By C. Gordon Hewitt ......•.••••.•••...•.••. V.Slled December 10,1910). Part A: COLLEMBOLA. By Justus W. FoIBOm ....•....••.....••..••••••.••.•.. (I•• lled JlIly 10, 1919). Part B: NEUROPTEROlP INSECTS. By Nathan Bank•.•••.....•.•.••••.. (I,.lIed JIII,l II, 1919). Part C: DIPTERA. Crane-flies. By Charles P. Alexander. Mosquitoes. By HarriBOn G. Dyar. ' Diptera(excluding Tipulidm and Culicidm). By J. R. Mallooh ....... (I.. lIed JIIIIl 14, 1919). Part D: MALLOPHAGA AND ANOPLURA. Mallophaga. By A. W. Baker. Anoplura. By G. F. Ferris and G. H. F. Nuttall .••.••.•••..•.•. (I"lIed September 11,1919). Part E: COLEOPTERA. Forest Insecta, including Ipidm, Cerambycidm, and Buprestidm. By J. M. Swaine. Carabidm and SilphidlB. By H. C. Fall. CoccinellidlB, Elateridm, ChryBOmelidlB and Rhynchophora (excluding Ipidle). By C. W. Leng. Dytiscidm. By J. D. Sherman, Jr..••.•....•.•••••••••••••.•••. (1"lIed December 11,1919). Part F: HEMIPTERA. By Edward P. VanDuzee .............................. (1 ..lIed JIII,l", 1919).
    [Show full text]
  • Combining Flat Water Paddling Over Tundra Lakes with the Rush of White Water Where It Tumbles Down to the Arctic Ocean
    COPPERMINE RIVER Introduction The Coppermine River is an excellent trip for experienced canoeists; combining flat water paddling over tundra lakes with the rush of white water where it tumbles down to the Arctic Ocean. The 640 km (400 mi.) trip from Lac de Gras (shorter if canoeists start at Point or Redrock Lakes) takes voyageurs past the tundra, through the treeline and the famous Coppermine Mountains and back to the tundra again as it winds to the north. This is a fast river with many rapids and whitewater stretches. All falls and many of the larger rapids require portaging. Other rapids demand very good manoeuvre skill and expertise in whitewater canoeing. You are on your own once the plane drops you off. There are no settlements until Coppermine on Coronation Gulf. Those attempting the trip should be experienced canoeists, with knowledge of survival and first aid skills. It is suggested to plan at least three to four weeks in advance for the trip. Access To The Coppermine River There are many large lakes in the headwaters of the Coppermine where canoeists can start a trip. The most popular starting points are Lac de Gras, the Source Lake and the Winter Lake. John Franklin started out from the Winter Lake in the summer of 1821 for the Polar Sea, Point Lake at the foot of Obstruction Rapids, Rawalpindi Lake and Redrock Lake. Starting from the Rawalpindi Lake and Redrock Lake avoids the long lake slogs. However, the trip from Rawalpindi to the Coppermine River at Redrock Lake includes several carries and shallow rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Nunavut News
    Tracking Latest News progress on NWT - NUNAVUT on Northern Exploration Baffinland IBA Projects 2019 QXQDYXWQHZV photo courtesy of Agnico Eagle photo courtesy of the Department Infrastructure Residents gather in Rankin Inlet for a donation event sponsored by Agnico Eagle in June. The mining company gave away $1 million to aid literacy and firefighting. 2 November 18, 2019 November 18, 2019 3 NWT/NUNAVUT MINING How much more should mines give the North? Many factors to consider when assessing whether Northern mines are truly on solid ground SKRWRFRXUWHV\RI'RPLQLRQ'LDPRQG0LQHV The Ekati diamond mine, 300 km northeast of Yellowknife, has been in production since 1998. Residents of the NWT are still waiting to hear whether owner Dominion Diamond Mines will proceed with the Jay project. by Derek Neary claims organization Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. (NTI) to assist in national miner has repeatedly referred to Nunavut as a "politic- 1RUWKHUQ1HZV6HUYLFHV housing. NTI takes in royalty payments from mining compan- ally attractive and stable jurisdiction with enormous geological NWT/Nunavut ies and has a trust fund approaching $2 billion. NTI's president potential" that has "the ability to generate strong gold produc- The North's mining industry has injected an enormous sum declined to discuss the matter when Nunavut News broached it. tion and cash flows over several decades." into the economies of the NWT and Nunavut. Netser has also made it clear that the mining industry must In the Baffin region, the Qikiqtani Inuit Association (QIA) There's no doubt about that. play a key role in the housing crisis, although he's stopped short extracted greater benefits from Baffinland Iron Mines through Notwithstanding, one area of debate remains whether the of imploring mining companies to construct new homes for the renegotiation of its Inuit Impact Benefit Agreement last year.
    [Show full text]