Julius Ca Esa R

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

CAESAR ULIUS ULIUS J CI GUIDE: VENI, VIDI, VI VIDI, VENI, ACKGROUND B GENERAL CRISIS Table of Contents Welcome Letter……………………………………………………….……………2 I. Geography of the Republic………………………………………………3 II. A Brief History of Rome……………………………………………...…4 III. Government of the Republic……………………………………………..6 IV. The Economy of Rome…………………………………………………..8 V. The Roman Military……………………………………………………10 VI. Roman Culture………………………………………………………….11 VII. Religion in the Republic………………………………………………..13 VIII. Technology of the Time………………………………………………...15 IX. International Relations………………………………………………….17 X. Roman Relations with Egypt…………………………………………...18 XI. Social Classes in the Roman Republic………………………………….18 XII. Roman Architectural Development……………………………………..19 XIII. The First Triumvirate…………………………………………………...20 XIV. The Life of Caesar………………………………………………………21 1 ante diem X Calendās Iunias MMDCCLXXI A.U.C. Salvēte, honorable delegates. It is our privilege to welcome you to EmpireMUNC V. In the spirit of building empires, we are proud to simulate life in the Roman Empire, one of the history’s greatest civilizations whose impact remains visible to the present day. Ahead of you, you have the exciting opportunity to explore the life and tumultuous times of one of its most consequential rulers, Julius Caesar. Settle into your quadriga and don your finest toga as you prepare to bask in the glory of Rome. My name is Kang Huh, and I have the pleasure of serving as your Chair this year. I am a former scholar of the Latin language (if you are currently in AP Latin and struggling through De Bello Gallico or The Iliad, I sympathize), and am now a Senior studying Finance and Politics. In addition to staffing your committee, I serve as the President of the NYU Model United Nations Club. While my days of formal Latin studies are behind me, my passion for the Classics burns just as brightly. Joining me is Mocha Sastry, who is going to be serving as your Crisis Director. She is a Senior studying History, with a specific interest in the rise and fall of ancient western civilizations, and Politics on the pre-law track. In her off time, she helps run a social initiative start-up in the city. Mocha’s excited to finally have a practical use for all those Ancient Greece and Rome classes, and is passionate about making this committee the best it can be. This committee as a concept has been five years in the making, and we truly hope to deliver an enjoyable weekend to you all. If you have any questions, feel free to send an email to either me or Mocha. We happily welcome any correspondences about expectations for the weekend, questions about the committee, or even a simple salutation. Otherwise, we look forward to hosting you in November. Until then, we wish you the very best of luck. Bonam fortūnam! Kang Huh Rhea Mocha Sastry Chair, Caesar Crisis Director, Caesar EmpireMUNC V EmpireMUNC V [email protected] [email protected] 2 Veni, Vidi Vici: The Life and Times of Julius Caesar I. Geography of the Republic During the 6th century BCE, thanks to the achievements of the powerful and wealthy Etruscan, Rome became one of the important states in Latium alongside Tivoli, Praeneste, and Tusculum. Although these Latin states had disputes that occasionally even led to war, they generally banded together against outside threats. Since the inception of Roman Republic in 509 BCE, the Romans expanded their territories at the expense of the Etruscan states. As Rome grew increasingly dominant in Latium, the remaining Latins banded together and waged war, although this Latin war (340-338 BCE) ended quickly with Rome’s victory. During the first two centuries since its establishment, the Roman Republic focused on extending its power over the rest of Italy through a combination of conquest and colonization. After three wars with the Samnites to the north and the Pyrrhic War (280-275 BCE) against the Greeks to the south, Rome secured the Italian Peninsula. Rome spent the following century competing for control over the Mediterranean. This resulted in the Punic Wars (264-146 BCE) against Carthage in Northern Africa, as well as conflicts with Syria, Macedonia, Greece, and Egypt. By the 1st century BCE, Rome had expanded to include North Africa, most of the Iberian Peninsula, France, Greece, and much of the eastern Mediterranean. Attaining control over all of these territories allowed Rome to become the main established commercial power in the entire Mediterranean area but governing all of these lands and its diverse peoples proved to be challenging. In addition, there was no shortage of external threats and growing powers outside of Rome. The Romans, as expected, faced these threats head on leading to conflicts such as the Cimbrian War (113-101 BCE) with the Germanic tribes of 3 Cimbri, the Mithridatic Wars (89-63 BCE) fighting Mithridates the Great, the ruler of the large kingdom of Pontus in Asia, and a campaign against the Cilician pirates taking advantage of a power vacuum over the Mediterranean. This leaves us at 49 BCE, with Rome struggling to maintain authority over its many territories and surrounded by enemies cautious of Rome’s continuously growing power. II. A Brief History of Rome The Social War The Social War began in 91 BCE, between the Roman Republic and several cities in Italy that had been Roman allies in the years before. It lasted 4 years and ended in a decisive victory for the Roman Military. The war originated with the Picentes because they were not afforded citizenship by the Romans, as the Romans ruled most of the Italian peninsula but did not give Italian cities citizenship rights, whether they voluntarily allied with Rome or not. This inequality was deemed unacceptable, and cities on the peninsula rose to war against Rome and were defeated. However, in the aftermath, Rome gave most other cities citizenship rights to avoid another uprising. Sulla’s Civil Wars Sulla and Gaius Marius had an established rivalry from the end of the Social War, where Sulla won consulship, and commanded an army against King Mithridates-- a position that Marius wanted for himself. Marius used his influence to reverse the decision and get command of the army from the Senate. However, the soldiers were loyal to Sulla, and marched with him on the city of Rome itself-- an unprecedented event in Roman history. Marius attempted to retaliate by raising an army of gladiators, but eventually was forced to flee. Sulla and his supporters passed a death sentence on Marius, which was never fulfilled. He was named a public enemy by Sulla in the Senate, who then went on to fight Mithridates as planned. 4 Once Sulla left Rome, Maruis and his son, Marius the Younger, returned to Rome with an army, and began to kill the supporters of Sulla. He exiled Sulla, declared himself and his ally, Cinna, consuls before his death, leaving Cinna sole control of Rome. Sulla, hearing of this, came back and had his troops surround the city, and he entered, taking Rome quickly and easily. His easy victory and subsequent conquering of Rome saw him established Dictator of Rome. in 82 BCE. The Catilinarian Conspiracy Much later on, after many wars on foreign soil and the expansion of the Roman Republic, came another civil war in Rome in the Catilline Conspiracy- a plot by the Senator Luicius Sergius Catilina to overthrow the consulship of Marcus Cicero and Gaius Hybrida. Catalina had been an unsuccessful candidate for consul in years previous and gathered public support for his plans and policies. When failed to be elected yet again, he assembled an army and planned to commit arson as well as murder of a majority of the Senators, and eventually take control of the government. In 63 BCE, Cicero discovered the plot through his mistress, and escaped death. Catalina was accused by Cicero in front of the Senate, and fled Rome under the guise of “voluntary exile”, although he was eventually condemned to death without a trial by Cicero and the Senate. The Formation of the First Triumvirate The first triumvirate was an informal alliance between three of the most influential political figures in the late Roman Republic- Julius Caesar, Pompey the Great and Marcus Crassus. Caesar and Pompey had a large, extensive patronage network that helped them gain favor and support in the senate, and Crassus was the largest landlord in Rome, making him the richest man. The three together could gather enough support to counter the influence of the 5 Roman Senate, which had begun to monopolize Roman politics. The alliance was secret, until the three voted together publicly on a land law in 58 BCE. The alliance was not one of similar morals or values, but one of personal advantage for all three members. Beginning of Caesar’s Civil War After Crassus’ death in the Battle of Carrhae during the Gallic Wars, Pompey and Caesar were left without a buffer between them, and their relationship worsened over time. Pompey was the heir apparent, with support from the Senate to be the sole Consul in Rome. However, Caesar, hailed the champion of the common people, had introduced and advocated for a series of reforms in government, was not about to step down. However, the Senate disliked his level of power and demanded he step down from his army command, which he refused to do unless Pompey did the same. Now, we wait with baited breath to see what will happen, as he bides his time on the other side of the Rubicon River, with Pompey in Rome. III. Government of the Republic Structure of the Government During the age of the Roman Republic, Rome grew to embrace democratic governance that date back to 509 BC, following the overthrow of monarchy and the institutional of several constitutional reforms.
Recommended publications
  • The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography

    The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography

    Faculty of Literature and Philosophy Julie Boeten The Herodotos Project (OSU-UGent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography Barbarians in Strabo’s ‘Geography’ (Abii-Ionians) With a case-study: the Cappadocians Master thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Linguistics and Literature, Greek and Latin. 2015 Promotor: Prof. Dr. Mark Janse UGent Department of Greek Linguistics Co-Promotores: Prof. Brian Joseph Ohio State University Dr. Christopher Brown Ohio State University ACKNOWLEDGMENT In this acknowledgment I would like to thank everybody who has in some way been a part of this master thesis. First and foremost I want to thank my promotor Prof. Janse for giving me the opportunity to write my thesis in the context of the Herodotos Project, and for giving me suggestions and answering my questions. I am also grateful to Prof. Joseph and Dr. Brown, who have given Anke and me the chance to be a part of the Herodotos Project and who have consented into being our co- promotores. On a whole other level I wish to express my thanks to my parents, without whom I would not have been able to study at all. They have also supported me throughout the writing process and have read parts of the draft. Finally, I would also like to thank Kenneth, for being there for me and for correcting some passages of the thesis. Julie Boeten NEDERLANDSE SAMENVATTING Deze scriptie is geschreven in het kader van het Herodotos Project, een onderneming van de Ohio State University in samenwerking met UGent. De doelstelling van het project is het aanleggen van een databank met alle volkeren die gekend waren in de oudheid.
  • Wars and Battles of Ancient Rome

    Wars and Battles of Ancient Rome

    Wars and Battles of Ancient Rome Battle summaries are from Harbottle's Dictionary of Battles, published by Swan Sonnenschein & Co., 1904. Rise of Rome—753 to 3911 B.C. The rise of Rome from a small Latin city to the dominant power in Italy Battle of Description Sabines According to legend, a year after the Romans kidnapped their wives from the neighboring Sabines, the (Kingdom) tribes returned to take vengeance. The fighting however, was stopped by the young wives who ran in B.C. 750 between the warring parties and begged that their fathers, brothers and husbands cease making war upon each other. The Sabine and Roman tribes were henceforth united. Alba Longa After a long siege, Alba was finally taken by strategm. With the fall of Alba, its father-city, Rome was (Kingdom) the undisputed leading city of the Latins. The inhabitants of Alba were resettled in Rome on the caelian B.C. 650 Hill. Sublican Lars Porsenna, king of Clusium was marching toward Rome, planning to restore the exiled Tarquins to Bridge the Roman throne. As his army descended on Rome from the opposite side of the Tiber, roman soldiers (Tarquinii) worked furiously to destroy the wooden bridge. Horatius and two other soldiers single-handedly fended B.C. 509 off Porsenna's army until the bridge could be destroyed. Lake Regillus Fought B.C. 497, the first authentic date in the history of Rome. The details handed down, however, (Tarquinii) belong to the domain of legend rather than to that of history. According to the chroniclers, this was the B.C.
  • The History of Rome, Vol. 6 [10 AD]

    The History of Rome, Vol. 6 [10 AD]

    The Online Library of Liberty A Project Of Liberty Fund, Inc. Titus Livius (Livy), The History of Rome, Vol. 6 [10 AD] The Online Library Of Liberty This E-Book (PDF format) is published by Liberty Fund, Inc., a private, non-profit, educational foundation established in 1960 to encourage study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals. 2010 was the 50th anniversary year of the founding of Liberty Fund. It is part of the Online Library of Liberty web site http://oll.libertyfund.org, which was established in 2004 in order to further the educational goals of Liberty Fund, Inc. To find out more about the author or title, to use the site's powerful search engine, to see other titles in other formats (HTML, facsimile PDF), or to make use of the hundreds of essays, educational aids, and study guides, please visit the OLL web site. This title is also part of the Portable Library of Liberty DVD which contains over 1,000 books and quotes about liberty and power, and is available free of charge upon request. The cuneiform inscription that appears in the logo and serves as a design element in all Liberty Fund books and web sites is the earliest-known written appearance of the word “freedom” (amagi), or “liberty.” It is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash, in present day Iraq. To find out more about Liberty Fund, Inc., or the Online Library of Liberty Project, please contact the Director at [email protected].
  • Gaius Marius

    Gaius Marius

    GAIUS MARIUS BIOGRAPHY WORKBOOK Gaius Marius GAIUS MARIUS (157-86 B.C.E.) Gaius Marius was at this time 2. In what township was Gaius forty-eight years old. Two-thirds of Marius born? his life were over, and a name which _________________________________ was to sound throughout the world _________________________________ and be remembered through all ages, _________________________________ had as yet been scarcely heard of _________________________________ beyond the army and the political _________________________________ clubs in Rome. Marius forced his way steadily 1. How old was Gaius Marius when upward, by his mere soldier-like he began to enter the public eye? qualities, to the rank of military _________________________________ tribune. Rome, too, had learnt to know _________________________________ him, for he was chosen tribune of the _________________________________ people the year after the murder of _________________________________ Gaius Gracchus. Being a self-made _________________________________ man, he belonged naturally to the popular party (the Populares). While Gaius Marius was born at in office he gave offense in some way Arpinum, a Latin township, seventy to the men in power, and was called miles from the capital, in the year 157 before the Senate to answer for B.C.E. His father was a small farmer, himself. But he had the right on his and he was himself bred to the plow. side, it is likely, for they found him Gaius Marius joined the army early, stubborn and impertinent, and they and soon attracted notice by his could make nothing of their charges punctual discharge of his duties. against him. He was not bidding at In a time of growing looseness, this time, however, for the support of Marius was strict himself in keeping the mob.
  • Final Playbook

    Final Playbook

    COIN Series, Volume VI PLAYBOOKby Andrew Ruhnke and Volko Ruhnke TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Germanic Role and Strategy ................... 2 4. Credits .................................... 11 2. Design Notes ............................... 2 6. New Card List .............................. 12 3. Event Text and Notes ......................... 4 © 2018 GMT Games, LLC • P.O. Box 1308, Hanford, CA 93232-1308 • www.GMTGames.com 2 Ariovistus Auguries. Your need to hold Control of the Germanic Tribes and the slowness of your columns of colonists will hold your heart close to the Rhenus. But consider a deeper thrust into Gaul if opportune— your enemies will not expect it! Design Notes Why Ariovistus? An earlier version of these notes from Volko appeared on the Inside GMT Games blog in 2016. It looks at why we thought Falling Sky deserved an Ariovistus expansion and how we chose what to include. Quotations from Caesar’s Gallic War are translations by Carolyn Hammond, Oxford University Press. When Andrew and I endeavored to set a COIN Series volume in ancient Gaul, we immediately decided on the latter years of Caesar’s campaigns there. My own starting point was a suggestion from David Dockter that I try my hand at a design on “Roman-style counterinsur- Germanic Role and Strategy gency”, that is to say, counter-revolt. Andrew suggested the portion Your Nation. You are Ariovistus, king of the Suebi, and can call of Caesar’s Commentaries that more concerned revolt than conquest. upon the numbers and warlike spirit of the greatest tribe of Germania. The latter period of mobilizing confederations of tribes—Ambiorix Nearby Gaul is divided and the Romans mere newcomers across the of the Belgic Eburones (in 53BC) and Vercingetorix of the Celtic Alps.
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    Supporting Information McConnell et al. 10.1073/pnas.1721818115 Fig. S1. Nearly contiguous annual average (black) and 11-y median-filtered (red) lead and related measurements in the NGRIP2 ice cores. Shown are 1100 BCE to 800 CE records of (A) total lead concentration, (B) enrichment relative to cerium, (C) estimated background lead concentration, and (D) nonbackground lead concentration and lead flux. McConnell et al. www.pnas.org/cgi/content/short/1721818115 1of8 Fig. S2. Differences between ice-core chronologies. Differences between the new DRI_NGRIP2 ice-core chronology based on multiparameter, annual-layer counting and the independent IntCal13 age scale based on cosmogenic nuclides (1) at 137 volcanic tie points in both the GRIP and NGRIP2 ice-core records. Gray shading shows 1 σ uncertainties from mapping GRIP cosmogenic nuclides (10Be) on to IntCal13 (14C), suggesting <2-y uncertainties (1 σ) in the new chronology during classical antiquity. The DRI_NGRIP2 chronology differs from the NEEM_2011_S1 chronology (2) by <2 y throughout antiquity, well within the stated uncertainties of that chronology. 1. Adolphi F, Muscheler R (2016) Synchronizing the Greenland ice core and radiocarbon timescales over the Holocene–Bayesian wiggle-matching of cosmogenic radionuclide records. Clim Past 12:15–30. 2. Sigl M, et al. (2015) Timing and climate forcing of volcanic eruptions for the past 2,500 years. Nature 523:543–549. Fig. S3. Differences between the original GRIP and DRI_NGRIP2 ice-core chronologies. The former, used to interpret the 18 previously published discrete measurements in the GRIP core of copper (1) and lead concentrations (2, 3), as well as lead isotope ratios (2), was incorrect by 20–30 y during classical antiquity.
  • Computer Analysis of Human Belligerency

    Computer Analysis of Human Belligerency

    mathematics Article Computer Analysis of Human Belligerency José A. Tenreiro Machado 1,† , António M. Lopes 2,*,† and Maria Eugénia Mata 3,† 1 Department of Electrical Engineering, Institute of Engineering, Polytechnic of Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 431, 4249-015 Porto, Portugal; [email protected] 2 LAETA/INEGI, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal 3 Nova SBE, Nova School of Business and Economics (Faculdade de Economia da Universidade Nova de Lisboa), Rua da Holanda, 1, 2775-405 Carcavelos, Portugal; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] † These authors contributed equally to this work. Received: 13 June 2020; Accepted: 20 July 2020; Published: 22 July 2020 Abstract: War is a cause of gains and losses. Economic historians have long stressed the extreme importance of considering the economic potential of society for belligerency, the role of management of chaos to bear the costs of battle and casualties, and ingenious and improvisation methodologies for emergency management. However, global and inter-temporal studies on warring are missing. The adoption of computational tools for data processing is a key modeling option with present day resources. In this paper, hierarchical clustering techniques and multidimensional scaling are used as efficient instruments for visualizing and describing military conflicts by electing different metrics to assess their characterizing features: time, time span, number of belligerents, and number of casualties. Moreover, entropy is adopted for measuring war complexity over time. Although wars have been an important topic of analysis in all ages, they have been ignored as a subject of nonlinear dynamics and complex system analysis.
  • An Economic History of Rome Second Edition Revised

    An Economic History of Rome Second Edition Revised

    An Economic History of Rome Second Edition Revised Tenney Frank Batoche Books Kitchener 2004 Originally published in 1927. This edition published 2004 Batoche Books Limited [email protected] Contents Preface ...........................................................................................................................5 Chapter 1: Agriculture in Early Latium.........................................................................6 Chapter 2: The Early Trade of Latium and Etruria .....................................................14 Chapter 3: The Rise of the Peasantry ..........................................................................26 Chapter 4: New Lands For Old ...................................................................................34 Chapter 5: Roman Coinage .........................................................................................41 Chapter 6: The Establishment of the Plantation..........................................................52 Chapter 7: Industry and Commerce ............................................................................61 Chapter 8: The Gracchan Revolution..........................................................................71 Chapter 9: The New Provincial Policy........................................................................78 Chapter 10: Financial Interests in Politics ..................................................................90 Chapter 11: Public Finances......................................................................................101
  • Retreats and Withdrawals in Republican Roman Warfare Daniel Morgan, BA (Hons) (Newcastle)

    Retreats and Withdrawals in Republican Roman Warfare Daniel Morgan, BA (Hons) (Newcastle)

    Retreats and Withdrawals in Republican Roman Warfare Daniel Morgan, BA (Hons) (Newcastle) A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ancient History and Classical Langugages May 2020 This research was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship Retreats and Withdrawals in Republican Roman Warfare 2020 Statement of Originality I hereby certify that the work embodied in the thesis is my own work, conducted under normal supervision. The thesis contains no material which has been accepted, or is being examined, for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made. I give consent to the final version of my thesis being made available worldwide when deposited in the University’s Digital Repository, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968 and any approved embargo. Signature: D. Morgan Date: 5 May 2020 Daniel Morgan University of Newcastle 2 Retreats and Withdrawals in Republican Roman Warfare 2020 Acknowledgements I would first and foremost like to thank my primary supervisor, Dr. Jane Bellemore, for her direction and assistance during all stages of my studies, and especially for her assistance with this thesis. I wish I had a sestertius for each gratuitous or ill-considered question I bombarded her with. Even so, I received a considered and useful response to each and every one. She has given me a great deal of feedback on numerous drafts of this thesis, and I would not have been able to do it without her guidance.
  • Roman Soldier Vs Germanic Warrior: 1St Century AD Free

    Roman Soldier Vs Germanic Warrior: 1St Century AD Free

    FREE ROMAN SOLDIER VS GERMANIC WARRIOR: 1ST CENTURY AD PDF Lindsay Powell,Professor of History Peter Dennis | 80 pages | 20 May 2014 | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC | 9781472803498 | English | United Kingdom Chronology of warfare between the Romans and Germanic tribes - Wikipedia Marcomannic Wars — participating Roman units. Roman—Alemannic Wars. Gothic War — The nature of these wars varied through time between Roman conquest, Germanic uprisings and later Germanic invasions in the Roman Empire that started in the late 2nd century BC. The series of conflicts, which began in the 5th century under the Western Roman Emperor Honoriuswas one of many factors which led to the ultimate downfall of the Western Roman Soldier vs Germanic Warrior: 1st Century AD Empire. The territories which remained under Byzantine control were called "Romania" today's Italian region of Romagna in northeastern Italy and had its stronghold in the Exarchate of Ravenna, icluding Rome. The support Pepin enjoyed from the papacy was decisive. Because of the Roman Soldier vs Germanic Warrior: 1st Century AD this move represented for the new king of the Franks, an agreement between Pepin and Stephen II settled, in exchange Roman Soldier vs Germanic Warrior: 1st Century AD the formal royal anointing, the descent of the Franks in Italy. Inthe Lombard army, deployed in defence of the Locks in Val di Susawas defeated by the Franks. Aistulf, perched in Pavia, had to accept a treaty that required the delivery of hostages and territorial concessions, but two years later resumed the war against the pope, who in turn called on the Franks. Defeated again, Aistulf had to accept much harsher conditions: Ravenna was returned not to the Byzantinesbut to the pope, increasing the core area of the Patrimony of St.
  • Between Amazons and Sabines: a Historical Approach to Women And

    Between Amazons and Sabines: a Historical Approach to Women And

    Volume 92 Number 877 March 2010 Between Amazons and Sabines: a historical approach to women and war Ire`ne Herrmann and Daniel Palmieri* Ire'ne Herrmann is associate professor of modern history at the University of Fribourg and lecturer of Swiss history at the University of Geneva. Daniel Palmieri is historical research officer at the ICRC. Abstract Today, war is still perceived as being the prerogative of men only. Women are generally excluded from the debate on belligerence, except as passive victims of the brutality inflicted on them by their masculine contemporaries. Yet history shows that through the ages, women have also played a role in armed hostilities, and have sometimes even been the main protagonists. In the present article, the long history and the multiple facets of women’s involvement in war are recounted from two angles: women at war (participating in war) and women in war (affected by war). The merit of a gender- based division of roles in war is then examined with reference to the ancestral practice of armed violence. Since time immemorial, war has been an integral part of the history of human- kind.1 Yet this age-old activity seems to have been the preserve of only part of humankind, since war is still perceived as being essentially a male affair. Many arguments have been put forward to explain this male predominance. ‘Innate violence’, ‘the predator instinct’, or even ‘the death wish’, traits believed to be particularly developed in men, are said to explain their propensity to go to war. Cultural traditions which instil the cult of war into boys from an early * The views expressed in this article reflect only the authors’ opinions.
  • Chronological Tables

    Chronological Tables

    CHRONOLOGICAL TABLES I. IMMIGRATIONS c. 2000. Italian tribes cross Alps and settle round Northern Lakes. c. 1500. Italians push southwards into Umbria, Latium, etc. c. 900. Etruscans settle in Etruria and Western Umbria. From 800 onwards, Greeks found colonies in Sicily and S. Italy. II. ROME UNDER THE KINGS *753- Foundation of Rome by Romulus from Alba Longa. * 71 5-673. Numa Popilius (Sabine), traditional founder of religious institutions. *673-642. Tullus Hostilius (Latin) destroys Alba Longa. Ancus Martius (Latin) bridges Tiber and founds Ostia. *6i 6-579. Tarquinius Priscus (Etruscan) makes war on Latius. *5 78-53 5. Servius Tullius (Etruscan ?) builds wall : Constitution by ' classes '. *535~5io. Tarquinius Superbus (Etruscan) completes Temple on Capitol. 510. Expulsion of Tarquin, who summons aid of fellow- Etruscans. 496. Defeat of Lars Porsenna at Lake Regillus. (* These dates are purely traditional.) III. THE EARLY REPUBLIC External Internal 494. Secession of plebs to Sacred Mount : creation of tribunes. 493- Roman alliance with Latin League. c. 480. Volscian War (Coriolanus) 477- War against Veii : battle of Cremera. 474- Etruscans defeated at Cumae. c. 460. War against Aequi (Cin- cinnatus) 455 456 THE ROMAN REPUBLIC External Internal 451- Decemviri begin tabulation of Laws. 450. Decemviri (Appius Claudius) de posed. 449- Valerio-Horatian Laws : rights to plebeians. 445- Lex Canuleia : permitting inter marriage of Orders. 431- Aequi defeated at Mt. Algidus. 396. Capture of Veii by Camil- lus. 390. Rome sacked by Gauls. 376. Licinian proposals : violent strife results. 367- Licinian proposals become law : one consul plebeian, etc. 360-50. Gallic Invasions. 287. Lex Hortensia gives plebescita authority of law.