Use of Illicit Tobacco Following Introduction Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Use of Illicit Tobacco Following Introduction Of Research paper Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052072 on 25 February 2015. Downloaded from Use of illicit tobacco following introduction of standardised packaging of tobacco products in Australia: results from a national cross-sectional survey Michelle Scollo, Meghan Zacher, Kerri Coomber, Melanie Wakefield – Centre for Behavioural ABSTRACT universe of all packs used by smokers.14 17 Further, Research in Cancer, Cancer Objectives To assess whether following such studies cannot determine the proportion of Council Victoria, Melbourne, ’ Victoria, Australia standardisation of tobacco packaging in Australia, packs non-compliant with Australia s packaging smokers were, as predicted by the tobacco industry, legislation that were legitimately purchased overseas – Correspondence to more likely to use illicit tobacco. either duty-free or with duty paid on entry.16 18 Dr Michelle Scollo, Centre for Methods National cross-sectional telephone surveys While consumer surveys provide alternative esti- Behavioural Research in conducted continuously from April 2012 (6 months mates of use of illicit tobacco not subject to these Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, 615 St Kilda Rd, before implementation of plain packaging (PP)) to March problems, respondents may not know the tax-paid Melbourne, VIC 3004, 2014 (15 months after) using responses from current status of the tobacco products they purchase, may Australia; cigarette smokers (n=8679). Changes between pre-PP, not admit to knowingly buying illicit tobacco or [email protected] the transition to PP and PP phase were examined using conversely may be more ready to believe than is Received 29 September 2014 logistic regression models. warranted that cigarettes sold at low prices are Accepted 13 January 2015 Results Among those whose factory-made cigarettes counterfeit. However, directly observing smokers’ were purchased in Australia, compared with pre-PP, packs19 or asking smokers objective concrete facts there were no significant increases in the PP phase in about their packs is likely to elicit responses that use of: ‘cheap whites’ (<0.1%; OR=0.24, 95% CI 0.04 are both honest and less subject to respondent to 1.56, p=0.134); international brands purchased for error. 20% or more below the recommended retail price In their study across 18 European countries, (0.2%; OR=3.49, 95% CI 0.66 to 18.35, p=0.140); or Joossens et al19 asked cigarette smokers to show packs purchased from informal sellers (<0.1%; field interviewers their latest purchased pack of copyright. OR=0.24, 95% CI 0.04 to 1.47, p=0.124). The cigarettes or hand-rolled tobacco. Packs were prevalence of any use of unbranded illicit tobacco defined as illicit if they had at least one of the fol- remained at about 3% (adjusted OR=0.79, 95% CI lowing tax evasion indicators: (1) it was bought 0.58 to 1.08, p=0.141). from illicit sources, as reported by smokers, (2) it Conclusions While unable to quantify the total extent had an inappropriate tax stamp, (3) it had an of use of illicit manufactured cigarettes, in this large inappropriate health warning or (4) its price was national survey we found no evidence in Australia of substantially below the known price in their increased use of two categories of manufactured market. Adaptation of such a study in Australia http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/ cigarettes likely to be contraband, no increase in needed to take account of that fact that tax stamps purchase from informal sellers and no increased use of are not required in Australia and that only very unbranded illicit ‘chop-chop’ tobacco. well-funded studies could include fieldworkers able to examine packs. While an audit of Australian retailers’ willingness to sell illicit tobacco conducted INTRODUCTION over 2012 and 2013 found some clear instances of Opponents of plain packaging (PP) in Australia products without health warnings,20 the price was claimed that the legislation would have major unin- somewhat volatile over this period with instances – tended consequences,1 3 in particular that the stan- of retailers trying to run down supplies of fully dardised appearance of the packs would make branded tobacco products, and a few cases of retai- 4 them easier to counterfeit and that this, combined lers selling stock in the old packaging at reduced on September 23, 2021 by guest. Protected with the reduced valuing of brands, would lead to rates afterwards.20 Further, tobacco companies an increase in use. The increased use of contraband claimed that prices of tax-paid products would fall sharply as a result of PP. Price was therefore not a Open Access cigarettes as well as unbranded illicit tobacco, it Scan to access more was argued, would disadvantage retailers and stable or reliable indicator of illicit status over the free content advantage ‘criminal gangs’ purported to be widely period immediately prior to and after the introduc- involved in its distribution.56Many of the same tion of PP. 20 arguments have been proffered by those opposed The World Customs Organization has identified to the introduction of standardised packaging in the problem of cigarettes produced by operators in the UK,78Ireland9 and New Zealand.10 11 one country being smuggled to the illicit market in Studies funded by Australian tobacco companies, other countries—so-called ‘cheap whites’.21 Its which rely heavily on surveys of discarded cigarette 2102 annual report listed a number of ‘brand’ To cite: Scollo M, packs, have reported increases in the size of the names of cigarettes falling into this category. The Zacher M, Coomber K, et al. illicit tobacco market following the introduction of report also listed several major international brands Tob Control 2015;24: PP legislation.12 13 Packs discarded in public places that appeared frequently among cigarettes identi- – ii76 ii81. are likely to provide a poor representation of the fied by customs officials and intercepted because it ii76 Scollo M, et al. Tob Control 2015;24:ii76–ii81. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052072 Research paper Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052072 on 25 February 2015. Downloaded from was believed that the required taxes had not been paid. Any additional brands (Nanjing, Su Yan and Zig Zag)as‘cheap reported purchase of ‘cheap whites’ in Australia would represent whites’, as no registered manufacturer could be located. clear cases of use of illicit tobacco. International brands such as Marlboro, Dunhill and Benson & Hedges are regarded as ‘International brands purchased at suspiciously low prices’ premium products in Australia and are rarely discounted.22 Any FM brands named in World Customs reports21 as frequently instances of purchase of such products at highly discounted smuggled included Benson & Hedges, Brooks, Camel, Craven A, prices would also therefore be highly likely to be illicit. Dunhill, Furongwang, Golden Eagle, LM, Lucky Strike, A study our group conducted in the Australian state of Marlboro, Mild Seven, Philip Morris, Rothmans, Shuangxi and Victoria between 2011 and 2013—1 year before and 1 year 555. We considered current packs of these brands suspicious after the introduction of PP—detected no changes among where the pack contained 20 cigarettes (the standard inter- smokers in use of unbranded tobacco, and low levels of use in national pack size, and the one most frequently smuggled) and November 2013 of cigarettes deemed likely to be contraband.23 where the reported price paid was 20% or more below the The current study aims to extend this analysis using a large recommended retail price (RRP), as reported in the Australian national data set and including baseline estimates of prevalence Retail Tobacconist.27 Where cigarettes were purchased in cartons of smokers reporting any use of several categories of cigarettes from large retail outlets, this cut-off point was relaxed slightly to which are highly likely to be contraband. We aimed to assess the accommodate prices just a few cents below the cut-off and to significance of changes since the period prior to PP in the per- take account of typically lower average prices for carton sales. We centage of current cigarette smokers whose current pack of also considered packs of 25 cigarettes suspicious if the reported cigarettes: price was 20% or more below the RRP of a pack of 20 cigarettes ▸ Carried a ‘brand’ name corresponding with known ‘cheap of that brand. whites’; ▸ Was a brand frequently observed in international intercep- Purchase from informal sellers tions of contraband tobacco and was purchased in Australia Current smokers were also asked “Where did you get the cigar- at a suspiciously cheap price; ettes you are currently smoking?” Those who indicated that rela- ▸ Was purchased from an informal seller. tives or friends had purchased their cigarettes were further asked We also aimed to assess any changes in the proportion of smokers from where this person had purchased them. Responses coded as ▸ Who had any self-reported recent use of illicit unbranded a ‘purchase from an informal seller’ were ‘from someone selling tobacco. independently and/or illegally (not at a store, shop or other main- stream establishment, but perhaps at local markets, delivery METHODS service, door-to-door, in a pub or just in the street)’. copyright. Design and participants We used data from national cross-sectional telephone surveys Unbranded illicit ‘chop-chop’ tobacco which were conducted continuously between 9 April 2012 and Use of unbranded illicit tobacco known in Australia as ‘chop- 30 March 2014, with about 100 respondents per week, chop’ could be reported in several ways throughout the survey. described more fully in Wakefield et al24 (this volume). After the initial question inquiring about tobacco products used, This study includes n=8679 adult smokers who reported smokers were asked whether they currently smoked any other smoking at least once per month.
Recommended publications
  • INTERNATIONAL CIGARETTE PACKAGING STUDY Summary
    INTERNATIONAL CIGARETTE PACKAGING STUDY Summary Technical Report June 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS RESEARCH TEAM ................................................................................................................... iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 2.0 STUDY PROTOCOL ........................................................................................................... 1 2.1 OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................ 1 2.2 SAMPLE AND RECRUITMENT ................................................................................. 2 3.0 STUDY CONTENT ............................................................................................................. 3 3.1 STUDY 1: HEALTH WARNING MESSAGES ............................................................... 3 3.2 STUDY 2: CIGARETTE PACKAGING ......................................................................... 4 4.0 MEASURES...................................................................................................................... 6 4.1 QUESTIONNAIRE DEVELOPMENT .......................................................................... 6 4.2 QUESTIONNAIRE CONTENT ................................................................................... 6 5.0 SAMPLE INFORMATION ................................................................................................... 9 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Research on Tobacco in China
    HNP DISCUSSION PAPER Economics of Tobacco Control Paper No. 21 Research on Tobacco in China: About this series... An annotated bibliography of research on tobacco This series is produced by the Health, Nutrition, and Population Family (HNP) of the World Bank’s Human Development Network. The papers in this series aim to provide a vehicle for publishing preliminary and unpolished results on HNP topics to encourage discussion and use, health effects, policies, farming and industry debate. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the author(s) and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank, to its affiliated organizations or to members of its Board of Executive Directors or the countries they represent. Citation and the use of material presented in this series should take into account this provisional character. For free copies of papers in this series please contact the individual authors whose name appears on the paper. Joy de Beyer, Nina Kollars, Nancy Edwards, and Harold Cheung Enquiries about the series and submissions should be made directly to the Managing Editor Joy de Beyer ([email protected]) or HNP Advisory Service ([email protected], tel 202 473-2256, fax 202 522-3234). For more information, see also www.worldbank.org/hnppublications. The Economics of Tobacco Control sub-series is produced jointly with the Tobacco Free Initiative of the World Health Organization. The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the authors and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Health Organization or to the World Bank, their affiliated organizations or members of their Executive Boards or the countries they represent.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Files Supplemental Table 1: Tar And
    Supplementary Files Supplemental Table 1: Tar and Ventilation Levels of Chinese Cigarette Brands in 2009 and 2012 2009 2012 Tar Tar UPC Brand Name (mg) Ventilated (mg) Ventilated 6901028000642 Shuangxi 13 Yes 12 Yes 6901028000987 Shuangxi 13 Yes 12 Yes 6901028001465 Shuangxi 13 Yes 12 Yes 6901028001618 Shuang Xi 11 Yes 10 Yes 6901028002097 Cocopalm 13 Yes 12 Yes 6901028002752 Cocopalm 13 Yes 12 Yes 6901028011075 Jiatianxia 13 Yes 13 Yes 6901028015417 Zhenlong 13 Yes 12 Yes 6901028024969 The X Catena Pride 8 Yes 8 No 6901028024990 Pride 13 Yes 12 Yes 6901028025812 Pride 6 Yes 8 Yes 6901028028356 Tianxiaxiu 14 Yes 14 Yes 6901028036672 Huang Guoshu 13 Yes 13 Yes 6901028036795 Huang Guo Shu 13 Yes 12 Yes 6901028037891 Huangguoshu 12 Yes 12 Yes 6901028045483 Camellia 13 Yes 12 No 6901028048231 Hongtashan 12 Yes 12 Yes 6901028055055 Honghe 12 Yes 13 Yes 6901028055086 Honghe 12 Yes 12 Yes 6901028055208 Honghe 12 Yes 12 Yes 6901028065078 Lan zhou 13 Yes 8 Yes 6901028065399 Lan zhou 13 Yes 8 Yes 6901028065580 Lan zhou 11 Yes 8 Yes 6901028071468 Zhongnanhai 5 Yes 5 Yes 6901028071499 Zhongnanhai 8 Yes 8 Yes 6901028071529 Zhongnanhai 5 No 5 No 6901028071765 Zhongnanhai 8 Yes 8 Yes 6901028072458 Beijing 12 Yes 12 Yes 6901028072601 Zhongnanhai 13 Yes 12 Yes 6901028075763 Chunghwa 13 Yes 12 Yes 6901028075770 Chunghwa 13 Yes 12 Yes 6901028075831 Double Happiness 8 Yes 8 Yes 6901028075992 Double Happiness 12 Yes 12 Yes 6901028076333 Memphis Blue 9 Yes 9 Yes 6901028090902 Renmin Dahuitang Ben Xiang 10 No 10 Yes 6901028092944 Renmin Dahuitang 13 Yes 12 Yes
    [Show full text]
  • Industry Overview Section Are in Nominal Terms
    INDUSTRY OVERVIEW This and other sections of this prospectus contain certain information which is derived from official government publications and industry sources as well as a report we commissioned from Euromonitor International, an Independent Third Party. We believe that the sources of this information are appropriate sources for such information and have taken reasonable care in extracting and reproducing such information. We have no reason to believe that such information is false or misleading or that any fact has been omitted that would render such information false or misleading. The information derived from the above sources has not been independently verified by us, the Sole Sponsor, the Sole Bookrunner, the Underwriters, any of their respective directors, affiliates or any other party involved in the Share Offer and no representation is given as to its accuracy. Unless otherwise indicated, all figures in this industry overview section are in nominal terms. SOURCES OF INFORMATION We commissioned a report from Euromonitor International, an Independent Third Party, to conduct an analysis of, and to report on, cigarettes and cigarettes packaging markets in the PRC for the period from 2007 to 2016. The date of the report was 29 June 2012. Euromonitor International has been engaged in a number of market assessment projects in connection with initial public offerings in Hong Kong, covering the PRC’s manufacturing industries in particular. A total fee of US$33,600 was paid to Euromonitor International for the preparation of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Cigarettes Sold in China: Design, Emissions and Metals
    Downloaded from tobaccocontrol.bmj.com on November 10, 2010 - Published by group.bmj.com Cigarettes sold in China: design, emissions and metals Richard J O'Connor, Qiang Li, W Edryd Stephens, et al. Tob Control 2010 19: i47-i53 doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.030163 Updated information and services can be found at: http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/19/Suppl_2/i47.full.html These include: References This article cites 18 articles, 10 of which can be accessed free at: http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/19/Suppl_2/i47.full.html#ref-list-1 Open Access This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode. Email alerting Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up in the service box at the top right corner of the online article. Notes To request permissions go to: http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions To order reprints go to: http://journals.bmj.com/cgi/reprintform To subscribe to BMJ go to: http://journals.bmj.com/cgi/ep Downloaded from tobaccocontrol.bmj.com on November 10, 2010 - Published by group.bmj.com Research paper Cigarettes sold in China: design, emissions and metals Richard J O’Connor,1 Qiang Li,2 W Edryd Stephens,3 David Hammond,4
    [Show full text]
  • Japan Tobacco International
    Analiza poslovnih modela i ekonomskog okruženja: Japan Tobacco International Hampshire, Tea Master's thesis / Diplomski rad 2020 Degree Grantor / Ustanova koja je dodijelila akademski / stručni stupanj: Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Academy of Arts and Culture in Osijek / Sveučilište Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u Osijeku, Akademija za umjetnost i kulturu u Osijeku Permanent link / Trajna poveznica: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:251:929930 Rights / Prava: In copyright Download date / Datum preuzimanja: 2021-10-05 Repository / Repozitorij: Repository of the Academy of Arts and Culture in Osijek SVEUČILIŠTE JOSIPA JURJA STROSSMAYERA U OSIJEKU AKADEMIJA ZA UMJETNOST I KULTURU ODSJEK ZA KULTURU, MEDIJE I MENADŽMENT SVEUČILIŠNI INTERDISCIPLINARNI DIPLOMSKI STUDIJ KULTUROLOGIJE TEA HAMPSHIRE ANALIZA POSLOVNIH MODELA I EKONOMSKOG OKRUŽENJA: JAPAN TOBACCO INTERNATIONAL DIPLOMSKI RAD MENTOR: izv.prof.dr.sc. Ivana Bestvina Bukvić KOMENTOR: Marija Tolušić, viši predavač Osijek, 2020. SVEUČILIŠTE JOSIPA JURJA STROSSMAYERA U OSIJEKU AKADEMIJA ZA UMJETNOST I KULTURU U OSIJEKU IZJAVA O AKADEMSKOJ ČESTITOSTI kojom ja, ________________, potvrđujem da je moj diplomski rad pod naslovom _________________ te mentorstvom izv. prof.dr.sc. Ivane Bestvine Bukvić i Marije Tolušić, više predavačice rezultat isključivo mojega vlastitog rada, da se temelji na mojim istraživanjima i oslanja na objavljenu literaturu kao što to pokazuju korištene bilješke i bibliografija. Izjavljujem da niti jedan dio diplomskog rada nije napisan na nedopušten način, odnosno da nije prepisan iz necitiranog rada, pa tako ne krši ničija autorska prava. Također izjavljujem da nijedan dio ovoga diplomskog rada nije iskorišten za bilo koji drugi rad pri bilo kojoj drugoj visokoškolskoj, znanstvenoj ili radnoj ustanove. U Osijeku, _______________________ Potpis ___________________________ SAŽETAK Poslovni subjekti ne mogu ostvariti konkurentnost i uspješnost na tržištu bez dobro osmišljenog i uspješno izvedivog poslovnog modela.
    [Show full text]
  • Curating Employee Ethics: Self-Glory Amidst Slow Violence at the China
    MEDICAL ANTHROPOLOGY http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2016.1174227 Curating Employee Ethics: Self-Glory Amidst Slow Violence at The China Tobacco Museum Matthew Kohrman Department of Anthropology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA ABSTRACT KEYWORDS Seen through the prism of public health, the cigarette industry is an Biopolitics; corporation; apparatus of death. To those who run it, however, it is something more ethics; museum; tobacco prosaic: a workplace comprised of people whose morale is to be shep- herded. Provisioning employees of the cigarette industry with psychic scaffolding to carry out effective daily work is a prime purpose of the China Tobacco Museum. This multistoried exhibition space in Shanghai is a technology of self, offering a carefully curated history of cigarette production thematized around tropes such as employee exaltation. Designed to anchor and vitalize the ethical outlook of those working for the world’s most prolific cigarette conglomerate, the museum is a striking illustration that industrial strongholds of ‘slow violence’ produce their own forms of self-care. China’s current building boom, often chided for effacing history, has been notably productive for at least one category of institutional memory making. During the past decade, hundreds of new museums have been built across the country (Xinhua 2012). One, on Changyang Road in the middle of Shanghai, appears decidedly out of place; its façade seems more at home in Mexico than China. Passing it initially, viewers may be lulled into believing they are seeing a replica of El Castillo, a famed site in the Yucatan. Replete with fortified grey windowless walls, a hefty external stone staircase, hieroglyphic-like carvings, and totem poles, the building is obviously a play on a Mayan temple.
    [Show full text]
  • Illicit Tobacco in Australia
    Illicit tobacco in Australia 2013 Full Year Report 3 April 2014 KPMG LLP Tel +44 (0) 20 7311 1000 Strategy Group Fax +44 (0) 20 7311 3311 15 Canada Square DX 157460 Canary Wharf 5 Canary Wharf London E14 5GL United Kingdom 3 April 2014 IMPORTANT NOTICE This report on illicit tobacco consumption in Australia (“Report") has been prepared by KPMG LLP in accordance with specific terms of reference (“terms of reference") agreed between British American Tobacco Australia, Philip Morris Limited and Imperial Tobacco Australia Limited “the Addressees”, and KPMG LLP. KPMG LLP has agreed that the Report may be disclosed to any party on the basis set out herein. KPMG LLP wishes all parties to be aware that KPMG LLP's work for the Addressees was performed to meet specific terms of reference agreed between the Addressees and KPMG LLP and that there were particular features determined for the purposes of the engagement. The Report should not therefore be regarded as suitable to be used or relied on by any other person or for any other purpose. The Report is issued to all parties on the basis that it is for information only. Should any party choose to rely on the Report they do so at their own risk. KPMG LLP will accordingly accept no responsibility or liability in respect of the Report to any party other than the Addressees. KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss Registered in England No OC301540 entity.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Report
    PROJECT NUMBER: 103330-009 Scientific Report Direct and Indirect Tobacco Advertisement, Sponsorship and Promotion in Four Cities of China This study was carried out with the aid of a grant from Research for International Tobacco Control (RITC) of the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) and the financial support of the Canadian Tobacco Control Research Initiative, the American Cancer Society, and Cancer Research-UK. 1 1. Background Tobacco advertisement, promotion and sponsorship are the leading means that the tobacco industry uses to compete for market share and increase demand for and consumption of its products. As research indicates, tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship not only encourage smokers to continue smoking, but also seduce large numbers of non-smokers into the deadly habit, in particular, luring young people and women to start smoking. If one were to compare smoking to a contagious disease, tobacco advertisement, promotion and sponsorship would be the vectors of transmission, which are to be blamed for the increased smoking rate and disease burden. To reduce the health hazards of tobacco use, restricting and even banning the vectors of transmission are crucial. As a result, a comprehensive ban on tobacco advertisement, promotion and sponsorship is regarded as an essential provision in the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO/FCTC). On November 10, 2003, the Chinese government officially signed the WHO/FCTC and on August 28, 2005, the 17th meeting of the 10th People’s Congress’s Standing Committee considered and approved the Convention, making China the 89th country to ratify it. The Convention has provided a legal framework for global control of the harms of tobacco, and collective protection of the health of all human beings.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution Agreement in Presenting This Thesis Or
    Distribution Agreement In presenting this thesis or dissertation as a partial fulfillment of the requirements for an advanced degree from Emory University, I hereby grant to Emory University and its agents the non-exclusive license to archive, make accessible, and display my thesis or dissertation in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known, including display on the world wide web. I understand that I may select some access restrictions as part of the online submission of this thesis or dissertation. I retain all ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis or dissertation. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation. Signature: _____________________________ ______________ [Mengmeng Kan] Date News Media Outreach of Tobacco-Free City – Gates Tobacco Control Project from 2009 to 2013 A Case Study on Media Coverage of 17 TFC Site Cities and the Overall Program By Mengmeng Kan Master of Public Health Hubert Department of Global Health _________________________________________ Chair’s signature Cheng Huang Committee Chair 3 News Media Outreach of Tobacco-Free City – Gates Tobacco Control Project from 2009 to 2013 A Case Study on Media Coverage of 17 TFC Site Cities and the Overall Program By Mengmeng Kan Bachelor of Art Beijing University of Chinese Medicine 2011 Thesis Committee Chair: Cheng Huang, PHD An abstract of A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Rollins School of Public Health of Emory University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Public Health in Hubert Department of Global Health 2013 4 Abstract News Media Outreach of Tobacco-Free City – Gates Tobacco Control Project from 2009 to 2013 A Case Study on Media Coverage of 17 TFC Site Cities and the Overall Program By Mengmeng Kan Background: Many studies have studies the news media coverage of tobacco control in different countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Tobaccocompaniesbybrand2017 (1)
    Geography Category Brand Name (GBO) Company Name (NBO) Data Type 2016 Azerbaijan Cigarettes Viceroy (British American Tobacco Plc) British American Tobacco Azerbaijan MMC Retail Volume 13.0 Azerbaijan Cigarettes Imperial Classic Black (Imperial Brands Plc) Imperial Tobacco MMC Retail Volume 13.0 Azerbaijan Cigarettes LD (Japan Tobacco Inc) JTI Caucasus LLC Retail Volume 8.7 Azerbaijan Cigarettes Winchester (Japan Tobacco Inc) JTI Caucasus LLC Retail Volume 8.6 Azerbaijan Cigarettes Kent (British American Tobacco Plc) British American Tobacco Azerbaijan MMC Retail Volume 7.9 Azerbaijan Cigarettes More (Japan Tobacco Inc) JTI Caucasus LLC Retail Volume 7.5 Azerbaijan Cigarettes Viceroy Lights Blue (British American Tobacco Plc) British American Tobacco Azerbaijan MMC Retail Volume 5.0 Azerbaijan Cigarettes Prima Deluxe (Imperial Brands Plc) Imperial Tobacco MMC Retail Volume 4.4 Azerbaijan Cigarettes West Lights (Imperial Brands Plc) Imperial Tobacco MMC Retail Volume 2.9 Azerbaijan Cigarettes Imperial Classic White (Imperial Brands Plc) Imperial Tobacco MMC Retail Volume 2.4 Azerbaijan Cigarettes Winston (Japan Tobacco Inc) JTI Caucasus LLC Retail Volume 2.0 Azerbaijan Cigarettes Winston Classic (Japan Tobacco Inc) JTI Caucasus LLC Retail Volume 1.7 Azerbaijan Cigarettes Kent Convertibles (British American Tobacco Plc) British American Tobacco Azerbaijan MMC Retail Volume 1.1 Azerbaijan Cigarettes Vogue Superslims Menthe (British American Tobacco Plc) British American Tobacco Azerbaijan MMC Retail Volume 0.9 Azerbaijan Cigarettes Winston
    [Show full text]
  • Smoking, Plain Packaging and Public Health | 3
    Reason Foundation Policy Brief 117 May 2014 By Julian Morris Executive Summary Smoking is one of the leading preventable causes of death in the world. In most wealthy countries, smoking has been declining for decades. Public health experts and anti-smoking groups have for many years advocated for restrictions on the marketing of tobacco products in general and cigarettes in particular. In response, governments in wealthy countries have banned most or all advertising, and many have banned sponsorship and other explicit forms of marketing of cigarettes. Many public health advocates say these restrictions do not go far enough and have called for the elimination of brand identifiers such as logos and colors on cigarette packs. Some experimental evidence has suggested that such plain packs would encourage smokers to perceive cigarettes less favorably, which might lead them to quit. However, this optimism was tempered by evidence that even restrictions on advertising have had at best a small influence on the decline in smoking (most of the decline can be traced to a better understanding of the risks of smoking, in large part a result of public information campaigns, and taxes on cigarettes). In 2011, Australia’s government introduced legislation mandating that cigarettes be sold in “plain packages” (i.e., without brand logos and colors). The legislation came into effect in late 2012. (Australia had already banned practically all tobacco advertising and other forms of marketing. In 2006, it had 2 | Reason Foundation introduced a requirement that cigarette packs display graphic health warnings on a substantial proportion of their surface area.) Some studies (such as a survey carried out when plain packaging was being introduced, an analysis of calls to a smoking cessation hotline, and a survey of outdoor smoking habits) suggest that plain packaging has indeed made cigarettes less desirable to smokers and has increased thoughts of quitting.
    [Show full text]